CA2279314C - Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2279314C CA2279314C CA2279314A CA2279314A CA2279314C CA 2279314 C CA2279314 C CA 2279314C CA 2279314 A CA2279314 A CA 2279314A CA 2279314 A CA2279314 A CA 2279314A CA 2279314 C CA2279314 C CA 2279314C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- pilot
- energy
- pilot energy
- value
- threshold value
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 64
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 49
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 51
- 238000010295 mobile communication Methods 0.000 abstract description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000010267 cellular communication Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012804 iterative process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001186 cumulative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- VJYFKVYYMZPMAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethoprophos Chemical compound CCCSP(=O)(OCC)SCCC VJYFKVYYMZPMAB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/16—Performing reselection for specific purposes
- H04W36/18—Performing reselection for specific purposes for allowing seamless reselection, e.g. soft reselection
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W36/00—Hand-off or reselection arrangements
- H04W36/24—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters
- H04W36/30—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data
- H04W36/302—Reselection being triggered by specific parameters by measured or perceived connection quality data due to low signal strength
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04W—WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
- H04W48/00—Access restriction; Network selection; Access point selection
- H04W48/20—Selecting an access point
Abstract
A method and apparatus for providing soft hand-off in a mobile communication system. In current systems, members of an active set of base stations (4, 4A, 4B, 4C) are determined by comparing measured pilot energy with fixed thresholds. The value of providing a redundant communication link to a mobile station (2) primarily depends on the energy of other signals being provided to the mobile station (2). In the present invention, the signal strength of each signal transmitted by other base stations (4, 4A, 4B, 4C) in communication with a mobile station (2) is considered when determining whether to add a base station to the set of base stations (4, 4A, 4B, 4C) in communication with the remote station. A base station is added only if the signal received from that base station provides sufficient added value to justify the impact on system capacity.
Description
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING SOFT HAND-OFF IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a novel and improved method and system for performing hand-off in a wireless communication system.
II. Description of the Related Art The use of code division multiple access (CDMA) modulation techniques is but one of several techniques for facilitating communications in which a large number of system users are present. Although other techniques, such as time division multiple access (TDMA), frequency division multiple access (FDMA) and AM modulation schemes such as amplitude companded single sideband (ACSSB) are known, CDMA has significant advantages over these other modulation techniques. The use of CDMA techniques in a multiple access communication system is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,901,307, entitled "SPREAD SPECTRUM MULTIPLE
ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM USING SATELLITE OR
TERRESTRIAL REPEATERS" and U.S. Patent No. 5,103,459, entitled "SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SIGNAL WAVEFORMS IN
A CDMA CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEM", both of which are assigned to.
the assignee of the present invention . The method for providing CDMA mobile communications was standardized by the Telecommunications Industry Association in TIA/EIA/IS-95-A entitled "Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System".
In the just mentioned patents, a multiple access technique is disclosed in which a large number of mobile telephone users, each having a transceiver, communicate through satellite repeaters or terrestrial base stations (also known as cell base stations or cell-sites) using code division multiple access (CDMA) spread spectrum communication signals. In using CDMA communications, the frequency spectrum can be reused multiple times thus permitting an increase in system user capacity. The use of CDMA
techniques results in much higher spectral efficiency than can be achieved using other multiple access techniques.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a novel and improved method and system for performing hand-off in a wireless communication system.
II. Description of the Related Art The use of code division multiple access (CDMA) modulation techniques is but one of several techniques for facilitating communications in which a large number of system users are present. Although other techniques, such as time division multiple access (TDMA), frequency division multiple access (FDMA) and AM modulation schemes such as amplitude companded single sideband (ACSSB) are known, CDMA has significant advantages over these other modulation techniques. The use of CDMA techniques in a multiple access communication system is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 4,901,307, entitled "SPREAD SPECTRUM MULTIPLE
ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM USING SATELLITE OR
TERRESTRIAL REPEATERS" and U.S. Patent No. 5,103,459, entitled "SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING SIGNAL WAVEFORMS IN
A CDMA CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEM", both of which are assigned to.
the assignee of the present invention . The method for providing CDMA mobile communications was standardized by the Telecommunications Industry Association in TIA/EIA/IS-95-A entitled "Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System".
In the just mentioned patents, a multiple access technique is disclosed in which a large number of mobile telephone users, each having a transceiver, communicate through satellite repeaters or terrestrial base stations (also known as cell base stations or cell-sites) using code division multiple access (CDMA) spread spectrum communication signals. In using CDMA communications, the frequency spectrum can be reused multiple times thus permitting an increase in system user capacity. The use of CDMA
techniques results in much higher spectral efficiency than can be achieved using other multiple access techniques.
A method for simultaneously demodulating data that has traveled along different propagation paths from one base station and for simultaneously demodulating data redundantly provided from more than one base station is disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 5,109,390 (the '390 patent), entitled "DIVERSITY RECEIVER IN A CDMA CELLULAR
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM", assigned to the assignee of the present invention . In the '390 patent, the separately demodulated signals are combined to provide an estimate of the transmitted data which has higher reliability than the data demodulated by any one path or from any one base station.
Handoffs can generally be divided into two categories- hard handoffs and soft handoffs. In a hard handoff, when a mobile station leaves and origination cell and enters a destination cell, the mobile station breaks its communication link with the origination cell and thereafter establishes a new communication link with the destination cell. In soft handoff, the mobile station completes a communication link with the destination cell prior to breaking its communication link with the origination cell. Thus, in soft handoff, the mobile station is redundantly in communication with both the origination cell and the destination cell for some period of time.
Soft handoffs are far less likely to drop calls than hard handoffs. In addition, when a mobile station travels near a cell boundary, it may make repeated handoff requests in response to small changes in the environment.
This problem, referred to as ping-ponging, is also greatly lessened by soft handoff. The process for performing soft handoff is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,101,501, entitled "METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING
A SOFT HANDOFF IN COMMUNICATIONS IN A CDMA CELLULAR
TELEPHONE SYSTEM" assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
An improved soft handoff technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 5,267,261, entitled "MOBILE STATION ASSISTED SOFT HANDOFF IN
A CDMA CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM", which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention .
In the system of the '261 patent, the soft handoff process is improved by measuring the strength of "pilot" signals transmitted by each base station within the system at the mobile station. These pilot strength measurements are of assistance in the soft handoff process by facilitating identification of viable base station handoff candidates.
The viable base station candidates can be divided into four sets. The first set, referred to as the Active Set, comprises base stations which are currently in communication with the mobile station. The second set, referred to as the Candidate Set, comprises base stations which have been determined to be of sufficient strength to be of use to the mobile station.
Base stations are added to the candidate set when their measured pilot energy exceeds a predetermined threshold TADD. The third set is the set of base stations which are in the vicinity of the mobile station ( and which are not included in the Active Set or the Candidate Set). And the fourth set is the Remaining Set which consists of all other base stations.
In an IS-95-A communication system, the mobile station sends a Pilot Strength Measurement Message when it finds a pilot of sufficient strength that is not associated with any the of the Forward Traffic Channels currently being demodulated or when the strength of a pilot that is associated with one of the Forward Traffic Channels being demodulated drops below a threshold for a predetermined period of time. The mobile station sends a Pilot Strength Measurement Message following the detection of a change in the strength of a pilot under the following three conditions:
1. The strength of a Neighbor Set or Remaining Set pilot is found above the threshold TADD.
2. The strength of a Candidate Set pilot exceeds the strength of an Active Set pilot by more that a threshold (TcoMP) 3. The strength of a pilot in the Active Set of Candidate Set has fallen below a threshold (TDROP) for greater than a predetermined time period.
The Pilot Strength Measurement Message identifies the base station and the measured pilot energy in decibels.
A negative aspect of soft handoff is that because it involves redundantly transmitting information it consumes the available communication resource. However, soft handoff can provide great improvement in the quality of communication. Therefore, there is a need felt in the art for a method of minimizing the number of base stations transmitting redundant data to a mobile station user which provides sufficient transmission quality.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a novel and improved method and apparatus for providing soft handoff in a mobile communication system. It should be noted at the outset, that one of the biggest problems with current systems is that the members of active set are determined in accordance with comparisons of measured pilot energy with fixed thresholds. However, the value of providing a redundant communication link to a mobile station depends strongly on the energy of other signals being provided to the mobile station. For example, the value of redundantly transmitting to a mobile station a signal with received energy of -15 dB will not be of much value, if the mobile station is already receiving a transmission with signal energy of -5dB. However, redundantly transmitting to a mobile station a signal of received energy of -15 dB may be of substantial value, if the mobile station is receiving transmissions with signal energy of only -13dB.
In a first embodiment of the present invention, the mobile station under the conditions discussed above transmits a Pilot Strength Measurement Message, which identifies each base station in the active and candidate sets and their corresponding measured pilot energy. The Pilot Strength Measurement Message is received by the base stations in communication with the mobile station. The base stations provide this information to a central control center, referred to as the base station controller.
At the base station controller, the active set is determined in accordance with the combined strength of other pilots in the active set. The base station controller sorts the pilots of the Pilot Strength Measurement Message according to their pilot strength measured at the mobile station.
Thus, after sorting the list of base stations consists of P1, P2...PN, where P1 is the strongest pilot signal and PN is the weakest. An iterative process is then undertaken to determine which of pilots P1, P2...PN should be part of the revised active set.
Initially, the revised active set comprises only the strongest pilots P1 and P2. When determining whether a pilot P; should be made part of the active set, a COMBINED_PILOT value is computed. The COMBINED_PILOT value consists of the sum of the energies of the pilots currently in the revised active set (P1, P2...Pi_1). A threshold is then generated in accordance with the COMBINED_PILOT. In the exemplary, embodiment the threshold is generated by performing a linear operation on the value of COMBINED_PILOT. If the pilot energy value, Pi, exceeds the threshold, it is added to the revised active set and the process is repeated for the next pilot P;+1. If the pilot energy value, P;, does not exceed the threshold, the revised active set comprises P1, P2...Pi-1. The revised active list is transmitted to the mobile station and the base station controller then sets up communications with the mobile station in accordance with the revised active set.
In an alternative embodiment, the revised active set is generated in the mobile station. The mobile station continuously measures received 5 pilot strengths of base stations. In determining whether to send a message indicating that a pilot from the candidate set should be moved to the active set, the measured pilot energy of a pilot in the candidate set is compared against a threshold generated in accordance with the COMBINED-PILOT as described above. If the strongest pilot in the candidate set satisfies the rule, then a message containing all active and candidate set pilots will be sent.
Following the iterative process performed on the members of the candidate set, a second iterative process is performed to determine whether a pilot should be deleted from the revised active set. In this operation, pilots are tested from the weakest member of revised active set to the strongest. A
COMBINED_PILOT energy value is computed that is the sum of the energies of all pilots belonging to the active set. A threshold value is generated in accordance with the COMBINED_PILOT value as described above and the pilot signal being tested is compared with the threshold. If a pilot has been below the threshold value for a predetermined period of time, a message would be sent to the base station indicating that such a pilot should be dropped.
The revised active list is transmitted to the base station controller through the base stations with which the mobile station is in communication. The base station sets up the communication links with the base stations in the mobile generated revised active list and transmits an acknowledgment to the mobile station when the links are set up. The mobile station then conduct communications through the base stations of the revised active set.
In the preferred embodiment, the mobile station monitors the pilot signals and in response to the monitored pilot signals the mobile station compiles members of the candidate set. Moreover, mobile station determines whether a change to the current active set is desirable in view of the criteria discussed above. Upon detecting any change in the desired membership of the active set, the mobile station generates a pilot strength measurement message that as described above includes the identities of all pilots in the candidate and active sets corresponding measured energy values and a corresponding indication whether the pilot should remain in the sets or be dropped into the neighbor set (which is indicated by setting of the KEEP variable described earlier). In the exemplary embodiment, the base station determines the members of the revised active set.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station comprising: computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station; comparing a signal energy measurement of a first base station with said threshold value; and selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value; wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than said first base station.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system wherein a first base station transmits a first pilot signal and a first traffic signal, and a second base station transmits a second pilot signal and a second traffic signal, and a remote station receives said first pilot signal and said first traffic signal, a method for determining whether to add a third base station to an Active Set of said remote station, comprising the steps of: demodulating said first pilot signal; measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal; generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy; demodulating said second pilot signal; measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal; comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold; adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated 6a second pilot signal energy exceeds said threshold;
generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal energy;
demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station; measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal; comparing said demodulated third pilot signal energy with said revised threshold; and adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system in which a plurality of base stations are in communication with a base station controller, a method for determining an Active Set of base stations to communicate with a remote station at said base station controller, comprising the steps of: receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station; selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations;
calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station; selecting a second base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value; summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations; determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station comprising:
6b means for computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station, wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than a first base station;
means for comparing a signal energy measurement of said first base station with said threshold value; and means for selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system wherein a first base station transmits a first pilot signal and a first traffic signal, and a second base station transmits a second pilot signal and a second traffic signal, and a remote station receives said first pilot signal and said first traffic signal, an apparatus for determining whether to add a third base station to an Active Set of said remote station, comprising: means for demodulating said first pilot signal; means for measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal; means for generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy; means for demodulating said second pilot signal; means for measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal; means for comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold; means for adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated second pilot signal energy exceeds said .
threshold; means for generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal 6c energy; means for demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station; means for measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal.; means for comparing said demodulated third pilot signal. energy with said revised threshold; and means for adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
According to yet a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system in which a plurality of base stations are in communication with a base station controller, an apparatus for determining an Active Set of base stations to communicate with a remote station at said base station controller, comprising: means for receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station; means for selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations; means for calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station; means for selecting a second base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value; means for summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations; and means for determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and means for determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
According to still a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system, comprising a processor configured to: sort a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set; sum a 6d portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum; determine a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum; select a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values; compare the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value; decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system by timely updating pilot energies from base stations, comprising: a processor for summing a portion of the' plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum, and for determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum, wherein the threshold value is updated to incorporate pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value and the first pilot set is revised to incorporate base stations associated with the pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value; and a generator for generating a message carrying first pilot set information.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system, comprising: sorting a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set; summing a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot 6e set to determine a combined pilot energy sum; determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum; selecting a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values;
comparing the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value; deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The features, objects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference characters identify correspondingly throughout and wherein:
FIG. 1 is an illustration of a cellular communication network;
FIG. 2 is an illustration of the cellular communication network of FIG. 1 which includes the base station controller;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the mobile station of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the base station of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of the method for generating the revised active set in the base station controller;
6f FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of the method for generating the revised active set in the mobile station;
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the preferred method of generating the candidate set in the mobile station; and FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating the preferred method of the present invention wherein a change in the preferred members of active set is detected and a pilot strength measurement message is transmitted to the base station in response to the detected change.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 illustrates wireless communication network in which the geographical area has been divided up into coverage areas referred to as cells and illustrated by a set of adjacent hexagons. Each cell is served by a corresponding base station 4. Each base station transmits a pilot signal which uniquely identifies that base station.
In the exemplary embodiment, the base stations 4 are CDMA base stations. A detail description of soft handoff in a wireless CDMA communication system is described in detail in the aforementioned U.S. Patent Nos. 5,101,501 and 5,267,261.
Mobile station 2 is located within the cell served by base station 4A. Since mobile station 2 is located near the cell boundary, it will likely be in a soft hand-off condition, in which it is simultaneously in communication with more than one base station. It may, for example be in communication with base stations 4A and 4B. Thus, base stations 4A and 4B are said to make up the active set. Moreover, it may be that mobile station 2 has determined other base stations in its vicinity to have a measured pilot energy above a predetermined threshold TADD, but that those base stations are not currently in communication with the mobile station. Those pilots are said to make up the candidate set. The candidate set could be made up of base stations 4C
and 4G.
Referring to FIG. 2, a typical communication network is illustrated.
Data directed mobile station 2 is provided from a public switched telephone network or other wireless system (not shown) to base station controller 6.
Base station controller 6 provides the data to the base stations in mobile station 2's active list. In the example, base station controller 6 redundantly provides data to and receives data from base stations 4A and 4B
The present invention is equally applicable to conditions where each cell is divided into sectors. Communications to and from each sector can be separately received and demodulated by mobile station 2. For simplicity, the discussion will be described wherein in each base of base station 4 are uniquely located base stations. However, it will be readily seen by one skilled in the art that the present invention is equally applicable to sectored cells, simply by considering the possibility that the base stations can be collocated and transmitting to separate sectors within a cell. The condition where a mobile station is in simultaneous communication with more than one sector of a cell is referred to as softer handoff. The method and apparatus for performing softer hand-off are described in detail in copending U.S. Patent No. 5,625,876, entitled "METHOD AND
APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING HANDOFF BETWEEN SECTORS OF A
COMMON BASE STATION", filed October 30,1993, which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
Within mobile station 2, each copy of the data packet is separately received, demodulated and decoded. The decoded data is then combined to give a estimate of the data of greater reliability than any one of demodulated estimates of the data.
FIG. 3 illustrates mobile station 2 of the present invention. Mobile station 2 continuously or at intermittent intervals measures the strength of pilot signals of base stations 4. Signals received by antenna 50 of mobile station 2 are provided through duplexer 52 to receiver (RCVR) 54 which amplifies down converts and filters the received signal and provides it to pilot demodulator 58 of searcher subsystem 55.
In addition, the received signal is provided to traffic demodulators 64A-64N. Traffic demodulators 64A-64N, or a subset thereof, separately demodulate signals received by to mobile station 2. The demodulated signals from traffic demodulators 64A-64N are provided to combiner 66 which combines the demodulated data, which in turn provides an improved estimate of the transmitted data.
Mobile station 2 measures the strength of pilot channels. Control processor 62 provides acquisition parameters to search processor 56. In the exemplary embodiment of a CDMA communication system, control processor 62 provides a PN offset to search processor 56. Search processor 56 generates a PN sequence which is used by pilot demodulator 58 to demodulate the received signal. The demodulated pilot signal is provided to energy accumulator 60 which measures the energy of the demodulated pilot signal, by accumulating the energy for predetermined lengths of time.
The measured pilot energy values are provided to control processor 62. In the exemplary embodiment, control processor 62 compares the energy values to thresholds TADD and TDRo?= TADD is threshold above which the received signal is of sufficient strength to effectively provide communications with mobile station 2. TDROP is a threshold value below which the received signal energy is insufficient to effectively provide communications with mobile station 2.
Mobile station 2 transmits a Pilot Strength Measurement Message which includes all pilots with energy greater than TADD and all members of the current active set whose measured pilot energy has not fallen below TDROP for more than a predetermined time period. In the exemplary embodiment, mobile station 2 generates and transmits a Pilot Strength Measurement Message following the detection of a change in the strength of a pilot under the following three conditions:
1. The strength of a neighbor Set or Remaining Set pilot is found above the threshold TADD.
2. The strength of a Candidate Set pilot exceeds the strength of an Active Set pilot by more that a threshold (TCOMP)-3. The strength of a pilot in the Active Set has fallen below a threshold (TDROP) for greater than a predetermined time period.
COMMUNICATION SYSTEM", assigned to the assignee of the present invention . In the '390 patent, the separately demodulated signals are combined to provide an estimate of the transmitted data which has higher reliability than the data demodulated by any one path or from any one base station.
Handoffs can generally be divided into two categories- hard handoffs and soft handoffs. In a hard handoff, when a mobile station leaves and origination cell and enters a destination cell, the mobile station breaks its communication link with the origination cell and thereafter establishes a new communication link with the destination cell. In soft handoff, the mobile station completes a communication link with the destination cell prior to breaking its communication link with the origination cell. Thus, in soft handoff, the mobile station is redundantly in communication with both the origination cell and the destination cell for some period of time.
Soft handoffs are far less likely to drop calls than hard handoffs. In addition, when a mobile station travels near a cell boundary, it may make repeated handoff requests in response to small changes in the environment.
This problem, referred to as ping-ponging, is also greatly lessened by soft handoff. The process for performing soft handoff is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,101,501, entitled "METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING
A SOFT HANDOFF IN COMMUNICATIONS IN A CDMA CELLULAR
TELEPHONE SYSTEM" assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
An improved soft handoff technique is disclosed in U.S. Pat.
No. 5,267,261, entitled "MOBILE STATION ASSISTED SOFT HANDOFF IN
A CDMA CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM", which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention .
In the system of the '261 patent, the soft handoff process is improved by measuring the strength of "pilot" signals transmitted by each base station within the system at the mobile station. These pilot strength measurements are of assistance in the soft handoff process by facilitating identification of viable base station handoff candidates.
The viable base station candidates can be divided into four sets. The first set, referred to as the Active Set, comprises base stations which are currently in communication with the mobile station. The second set, referred to as the Candidate Set, comprises base stations which have been determined to be of sufficient strength to be of use to the mobile station.
Base stations are added to the candidate set when their measured pilot energy exceeds a predetermined threshold TADD. The third set is the set of base stations which are in the vicinity of the mobile station ( and which are not included in the Active Set or the Candidate Set). And the fourth set is the Remaining Set which consists of all other base stations.
In an IS-95-A communication system, the mobile station sends a Pilot Strength Measurement Message when it finds a pilot of sufficient strength that is not associated with any the of the Forward Traffic Channels currently being demodulated or when the strength of a pilot that is associated with one of the Forward Traffic Channels being demodulated drops below a threshold for a predetermined period of time. The mobile station sends a Pilot Strength Measurement Message following the detection of a change in the strength of a pilot under the following three conditions:
1. The strength of a Neighbor Set or Remaining Set pilot is found above the threshold TADD.
2. The strength of a Candidate Set pilot exceeds the strength of an Active Set pilot by more that a threshold (TcoMP) 3. The strength of a pilot in the Active Set of Candidate Set has fallen below a threshold (TDROP) for greater than a predetermined time period.
The Pilot Strength Measurement Message identifies the base station and the measured pilot energy in decibels.
A negative aspect of soft handoff is that because it involves redundantly transmitting information it consumes the available communication resource. However, soft handoff can provide great improvement in the quality of communication. Therefore, there is a need felt in the art for a method of minimizing the number of base stations transmitting redundant data to a mobile station user which provides sufficient transmission quality.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is a novel and improved method and apparatus for providing soft handoff in a mobile communication system. It should be noted at the outset, that one of the biggest problems with current systems is that the members of active set are determined in accordance with comparisons of measured pilot energy with fixed thresholds. However, the value of providing a redundant communication link to a mobile station depends strongly on the energy of other signals being provided to the mobile station. For example, the value of redundantly transmitting to a mobile station a signal with received energy of -15 dB will not be of much value, if the mobile station is already receiving a transmission with signal energy of -5dB. However, redundantly transmitting to a mobile station a signal of received energy of -15 dB may be of substantial value, if the mobile station is receiving transmissions with signal energy of only -13dB.
In a first embodiment of the present invention, the mobile station under the conditions discussed above transmits a Pilot Strength Measurement Message, which identifies each base station in the active and candidate sets and their corresponding measured pilot energy. The Pilot Strength Measurement Message is received by the base stations in communication with the mobile station. The base stations provide this information to a central control center, referred to as the base station controller.
At the base station controller, the active set is determined in accordance with the combined strength of other pilots in the active set. The base station controller sorts the pilots of the Pilot Strength Measurement Message according to their pilot strength measured at the mobile station.
Thus, after sorting the list of base stations consists of P1, P2...PN, where P1 is the strongest pilot signal and PN is the weakest. An iterative process is then undertaken to determine which of pilots P1, P2...PN should be part of the revised active set.
Initially, the revised active set comprises only the strongest pilots P1 and P2. When determining whether a pilot P; should be made part of the active set, a COMBINED_PILOT value is computed. The COMBINED_PILOT value consists of the sum of the energies of the pilots currently in the revised active set (P1, P2...Pi_1). A threshold is then generated in accordance with the COMBINED_PILOT. In the exemplary, embodiment the threshold is generated by performing a linear operation on the value of COMBINED_PILOT. If the pilot energy value, Pi, exceeds the threshold, it is added to the revised active set and the process is repeated for the next pilot P;+1. If the pilot energy value, P;, does not exceed the threshold, the revised active set comprises P1, P2...Pi-1. The revised active list is transmitted to the mobile station and the base station controller then sets up communications with the mobile station in accordance with the revised active set.
In an alternative embodiment, the revised active set is generated in the mobile station. The mobile station continuously measures received 5 pilot strengths of base stations. In determining whether to send a message indicating that a pilot from the candidate set should be moved to the active set, the measured pilot energy of a pilot in the candidate set is compared against a threshold generated in accordance with the COMBINED-PILOT as described above. If the strongest pilot in the candidate set satisfies the rule, then a message containing all active and candidate set pilots will be sent.
Following the iterative process performed on the members of the candidate set, a second iterative process is performed to determine whether a pilot should be deleted from the revised active set. In this operation, pilots are tested from the weakest member of revised active set to the strongest. A
COMBINED_PILOT energy value is computed that is the sum of the energies of all pilots belonging to the active set. A threshold value is generated in accordance with the COMBINED_PILOT value as described above and the pilot signal being tested is compared with the threshold. If a pilot has been below the threshold value for a predetermined period of time, a message would be sent to the base station indicating that such a pilot should be dropped.
The revised active list is transmitted to the base station controller through the base stations with which the mobile station is in communication. The base station sets up the communication links with the base stations in the mobile generated revised active list and transmits an acknowledgment to the mobile station when the links are set up. The mobile station then conduct communications through the base stations of the revised active set.
In the preferred embodiment, the mobile station monitors the pilot signals and in response to the monitored pilot signals the mobile station compiles members of the candidate set. Moreover, mobile station determines whether a change to the current active set is desirable in view of the criteria discussed above. Upon detecting any change in the desired membership of the active set, the mobile station generates a pilot strength measurement message that as described above includes the identities of all pilots in the candidate and active sets corresponding measured energy values and a corresponding indication whether the pilot should remain in the sets or be dropped into the neighbor set (which is indicated by setting of the KEEP variable described earlier). In the exemplary embodiment, the base station determines the members of the revised active set.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station comprising: computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station; comparing a signal energy measurement of a first base station with said threshold value; and selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value; wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than said first base station.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system wherein a first base station transmits a first pilot signal and a first traffic signal, and a second base station transmits a second pilot signal and a second traffic signal, and a remote station receives said first pilot signal and said first traffic signal, a method for determining whether to add a third base station to an Active Set of said remote station, comprising the steps of: demodulating said first pilot signal; measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal; generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy; demodulating said second pilot signal; measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal; comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold; adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated 6a second pilot signal energy exceeds said threshold;
generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal energy;
demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station; measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal; comparing said demodulated third pilot signal energy with said revised threshold; and adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system in which a plurality of base stations are in communication with a base station controller, a method for determining an Active Set of base stations to communicate with a remote station at said base station controller, comprising the steps of: receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station; selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations;
calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station; selecting a second base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value; summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations; determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station comprising:
6b means for computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station, wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than a first base station;
means for comparing a signal energy measurement of said first base station with said threshold value; and means for selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value.
According to a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system wherein a first base station transmits a first pilot signal and a first traffic signal, and a second base station transmits a second pilot signal and a second traffic signal, and a remote station receives said first pilot signal and said first traffic signal, an apparatus for determining whether to add a third base station to an Active Set of said remote station, comprising: means for demodulating said first pilot signal; means for measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal; means for generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy; means for demodulating said second pilot signal; means for measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal; means for comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold; means for adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated second pilot signal energy exceeds said .
threshold; means for generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal 6c energy; means for demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station; means for measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal.; means for comparing said demodulated third pilot signal. energy with said revised threshold; and means for adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
According to yet a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided in a wireless communications system in which a plurality of base stations are in communication with a base station controller, an apparatus for determining an Active Set of base stations to communicate with a remote station at said base station controller, comprising: means for receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station; means for selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations; means for calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station; means for selecting a second base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value; means for summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations; and means for determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and means for determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
According to still a further aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system, comprising a processor configured to: sort a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set; sum a 6d portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum; determine a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum; select a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values; compare the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value; decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an apparatus for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system by timely updating pilot energies from base stations, comprising: a processor for summing a portion of the' plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum, and for determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum, wherein the threshold value is updated to incorporate pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value and the first pilot set is revised to incorporate base stations associated with the pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value; and a generator for generating a message carrying first pilot set information.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system, comprising: sorting a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set; summing a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot 6e set to determine a combined pilot energy sum; determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum; selecting a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values;
comparing the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value; deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The features, objects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the detailed description set forth below when taken in conjunction with the drawings in which like reference characters identify correspondingly throughout and wherein:
FIG. 1 is an illustration of a cellular communication network;
FIG. 2 is an illustration of the cellular communication network of FIG. 1 which includes the base station controller;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the mobile station of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the base station of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of the method for generating the revised active set in the base station controller;
6f FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of the method for generating the revised active set in the mobile station;
FIG. 7 is a flow diagram illustrating the preferred method of generating the candidate set in the mobile station; and FIG. 8 is a flow diagram illustrating the preferred method of the present invention wherein a change in the preferred members of active set is detected and a pilot strength measurement message is transmitted to the base station in response to the detected change.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 illustrates wireless communication network in which the geographical area has been divided up into coverage areas referred to as cells and illustrated by a set of adjacent hexagons. Each cell is served by a corresponding base station 4. Each base station transmits a pilot signal which uniquely identifies that base station.
In the exemplary embodiment, the base stations 4 are CDMA base stations. A detail description of soft handoff in a wireless CDMA communication system is described in detail in the aforementioned U.S. Patent Nos. 5,101,501 and 5,267,261.
Mobile station 2 is located within the cell served by base station 4A. Since mobile station 2 is located near the cell boundary, it will likely be in a soft hand-off condition, in which it is simultaneously in communication with more than one base station. It may, for example be in communication with base stations 4A and 4B. Thus, base stations 4A and 4B are said to make up the active set. Moreover, it may be that mobile station 2 has determined other base stations in its vicinity to have a measured pilot energy above a predetermined threshold TADD, but that those base stations are not currently in communication with the mobile station. Those pilots are said to make up the candidate set. The candidate set could be made up of base stations 4C
and 4G.
Referring to FIG. 2, a typical communication network is illustrated.
Data directed mobile station 2 is provided from a public switched telephone network or other wireless system (not shown) to base station controller 6.
Base station controller 6 provides the data to the base stations in mobile station 2's active list. In the example, base station controller 6 redundantly provides data to and receives data from base stations 4A and 4B
The present invention is equally applicable to conditions where each cell is divided into sectors. Communications to and from each sector can be separately received and demodulated by mobile station 2. For simplicity, the discussion will be described wherein in each base of base station 4 are uniquely located base stations. However, it will be readily seen by one skilled in the art that the present invention is equally applicable to sectored cells, simply by considering the possibility that the base stations can be collocated and transmitting to separate sectors within a cell. The condition where a mobile station is in simultaneous communication with more than one sector of a cell is referred to as softer handoff. The method and apparatus for performing softer hand-off are described in detail in copending U.S. Patent No. 5,625,876, entitled "METHOD AND
APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING HANDOFF BETWEEN SECTORS OF A
COMMON BASE STATION", filed October 30,1993, which is assigned to the assignee of the present invention.
Within mobile station 2, each copy of the data packet is separately received, demodulated and decoded. The decoded data is then combined to give a estimate of the data of greater reliability than any one of demodulated estimates of the data.
FIG. 3 illustrates mobile station 2 of the present invention. Mobile station 2 continuously or at intermittent intervals measures the strength of pilot signals of base stations 4. Signals received by antenna 50 of mobile station 2 are provided through duplexer 52 to receiver (RCVR) 54 which amplifies down converts and filters the received signal and provides it to pilot demodulator 58 of searcher subsystem 55.
In addition, the received signal is provided to traffic demodulators 64A-64N. Traffic demodulators 64A-64N, or a subset thereof, separately demodulate signals received by to mobile station 2. The demodulated signals from traffic demodulators 64A-64N are provided to combiner 66 which combines the demodulated data, which in turn provides an improved estimate of the transmitted data.
Mobile station 2 measures the strength of pilot channels. Control processor 62 provides acquisition parameters to search processor 56. In the exemplary embodiment of a CDMA communication system, control processor 62 provides a PN offset to search processor 56. Search processor 56 generates a PN sequence which is used by pilot demodulator 58 to demodulate the received signal. The demodulated pilot signal is provided to energy accumulator 60 which measures the energy of the demodulated pilot signal, by accumulating the energy for predetermined lengths of time.
The measured pilot energy values are provided to control processor 62. In the exemplary embodiment, control processor 62 compares the energy values to thresholds TADD and TDRo?= TADD is threshold above which the received signal is of sufficient strength to effectively provide communications with mobile station 2. TDROP is a threshold value below which the received signal energy is insufficient to effectively provide communications with mobile station 2.
Mobile station 2 transmits a Pilot Strength Measurement Message which includes all pilots with energy greater than TADD and all members of the current active set whose measured pilot energy has not fallen below TDROP for more than a predetermined time period. In the exemplary embodiment, mobile station 2 generates and transmits a Pilot Strength Measurement Message following the detection of a change in the strength of a pilot under the following three conditions:
1. The strength of a neighbor Set or Remaining Set pilot is found above the threshold TADD.
2. The strength of a Candidate Set pilot exceeds the strength of an Active Set pilot by more that a threshold (TCOMP)-3. The strength of a pilot in the Active Set has fallen below a threshold (TDROP) for greater than a predetermined time period.
In the exemplary embodiment, the Pilot Strength Measurement Message identifies the pilot and provides a corresponding measured pilot energy. In the exemplary embodiment, the base stations in the Pilot Strength Measurement Message are identified by their pilot offsets and their corresponding measured pilot energy is provided in units of decibels.
Control processor 62 provides the identities of the pilots and their corresponding measured pilot energies to message generator 70. Message generator 70 generates a Pilot Strength Measurement Message containing the information. The Pilot Strength Measurement Message is provided to transmitter (TMTR) 68, which encodes, modulates, upconverts and amplifies the message. The message is then transmitted through duplexer 52 and antenna 50.
Referring to FIG. 4, the Pilot Strength Measurement Message is received by antenna 30 of base station 4 and provided to receiver (RCVR) 28, which amplifies, down converts, demodulates and decodes the received signal and provides the message to base station controller (BSC) interface 26.
Base station controller (BSC) interface 26 sends the message to base station controller (BSC) 6. The message is provided to selector 22, which may also receive the message redundantly from other base stations which are in communication with mobile station 2. Selector 22 combines message estimates received from the base stations in communication with mobile station 2 to provide an improved packet estimates.
Selector 22 provides the power strength measurement message to hand-off control processor 20. In the first exemplary embodiment, hand-off control processor 20 selects the base stations which will communicate with mobile station 2, that is the members of the revised active set, in accordance with the method provided in FIG. 5.
In block 100, hand-off control processor 20 sorts pilots in the Pilot Strength Measurement Message according to their strengths. So, for example, Pl would be the strongest received pilot, P2 would be the second strongest pilot and so on. In block 102, the revised active set (ACTIVE_SET) is set to include P1 and P2. In block 104, the variable COMBINED-PILOT is set to the sum of the energies of P1 and P2. In block 106, the loop variable i is set to 3.
In block 108, the energy of the pilot signal of the ith strongest received signal (P;) is compared against a threshold value to determine whether it should be added to the revised active set. In the exemplary embodiment, the threshold (T) is determined in accordance with equation (1) below:
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT_INTERCEPT (1) In the exemplary embodiment, SOFT_SLOPE is set to 2.25 and SOFT_INTERCEPT is set to 3Ø The values of SOFT-SLOPE and 5 SOFT_INTERCEPT can be parameters that are sent over the air to the mobile station or selected values could be programmed into the mobile station. The values of SOFT_SLOPE and SOFT_INTERCEPT can be determined in accordance with factors such as the amount of soft handoff which is acceptable to a network manager and empirical studies on the 10 quality of transmission links. If the energy value Pi is less than the threshold value, then the flow proceeds to block 110 and the revised active set includes the signals corresponding to the pilots {P1... Pi-1 1.
If the energy value Pi is greater than the threshold value in block 108, then the flow proceeds to block 112. In block 112, a new COMBINED-PILOT
is computed by summing the value of the energy of the ith strongest signal in the pilot strength measurement message (Pi) with the current value of COMBINED_PILOT. Because in the exemplary embodiment, the energy of the pilot signals is provided in decibels, the energies must be converted to linear representations before being summed and put back into decibel form.
In block 114, Pi is added to the revised active set.
In block 116, the loop variable (i) is incremented. In block 118, hand off control processor 20 checks to determine whether all base stations in the pilot strength measurement message have been tested. If there are no remaining pilots to test, then the flow proceeds to block 120 and the revised active set comprises all the base stations in the pilot strength measurement message. If, in block 118, there are base stations in the pilot strength measurement message which remain to be tested, the flow returns to block 108 and proceeds as described above.
After generating the revised active set, base station controller 6 determines whether the base stations in the revised active list can accommodate communications with mobile station 2. If any of the base stations in the revised active set cannot accommodate communications with mobile station 2, they are removed from the revised active set. After generating the revised active set, hand-off control processor 20 provides the information to selector 22 indicating the members in the revised active set.
In response to the revised active set provided by hand-off control processor 20, selector 22 allocates traffic channels for performing communications to the mobile station using the base stations in the revised active set.
T T-Hand-off control processor 20 provides a message indicating the revised active set to message generator 24. Message generator 24 generates a message for transmission to mobile station 2, referred to as the handoff direction message. The handoff direction message indicates the base stations in the revised active set and corresponding channels those base stations will use to communicate with mobile station 2. The message is provided through selector 22 and provided to the base stations which were in communication with mobile station 2 prior to the generation of the revised active set. The base stations in communication with mobile station 2 transmit the handoff direction message to mobile station 2.
Referring back to FIG. 3, the handoff direction message is received by antenna 50 of mobile station 2. It is provided to receiver 54, which amplifies, downconverts, demodulates and decodes the message and provides it to control processor 62. Control processor 62, then, configures the traffic channel demodulators 64A-64N to demodulate traffic channels in accordance with the revised active set specified in the handoff direction message.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the revised active set is generated at mobile station 2. This alternative embodiment, provides more timely generation of the revised active set. Because the Pilot Strength Measurement Message is only transmitted under the three conditions described above, update of the active set may be undesirably delayed. However, the alternative embodiment results in transmission of the pilot strength measurement message in a more timely fashion.
In the alternative embodiment, mobile station 2 measures received pilot energy as described above. The pilot energy values are provided to control process 62. In response, control processor 62 generates a revised active set. If the revised active set differs from the current active set, mobile station 2 transmits a message indicating the members of the revised active set to base station controller 6 through base stations 4. Base station controller 6 sets up communications with mobile station 2. Mobile station 2 reconfigures traffic channel demodulators 64A-64N to demodulate received signals in accordance with the mobile generated revised active set.
In the exemplary embodiment, control processor 62 in mobile station 2 generates the revised active set in accordance with the method shown in FIG. 6. In block 200, pilots with measured energy in excess of threshold TADD
are added to the candidate list and pilots who's measured energy has fallen below TDRoP for more that a predetermined time period are removed from the candidate list. In the exemplary embodiment, the time a pilot is below TDROP is tracked by a timer within control processor 62 referred to herein as the TDROP timer.
In block 202, the pilots in the candidate list are sorted from strongest to weakest. Thus, PC, is stronger than PC2, and so on. In block 204, the variable COMBINED_PILOT is set equal to the energy of all pilots in the active set. Also, in block 204, loop variable (i) is initialized to the value 1. In block 206, the candidate set member Pci is tested to determine whether it should be made part of the revised active set. Pc; is compared against a threshold generated in accordance with the current value of COMBINED_PILOT. In the exemplary embodiment, the threshold (T) is generated in accordance with equation (1) above.
If the pilot energy of Pc; exceeds threshold T, then the flow moves to block 208. In block 208, pilot Pc; is added to the revised active set. In block 210, a new value of COMBINED_PILOT is computed which is equal to the old value of COMBINED_PILOT plus the energy of pilot Pc;. In block 212, the loop variable (i) is incremented.
In block 213, it is determined whether all pilots in the candidate set have been tested. If all pilots in the candidate set have not been tested, then the flow moves to block 200 and proceeds as described above. If all pilots in the candidate set have been tested or if, back in block 206, the pilot energy of Pci did not exceed threshold T, then the flow moves to block 214. In block 214, the revised active set is sorted from lowest energy to highest energy.
Thus, PAl has the minimum measured energy in the revised active set, PA2 has the second lowest and so on up to the last member of the revised active set PAN.
In block 216, it is determined whether PAl is a member of the candidate set. If PA1 is a member of the candidate set then the flow moves to block 34 and the revision of the active set is complete. In block 218, loop variable i is set to 1. In block 220, COMBINED PILOT for testing PA; is computed. The value of COMBINED_PILOT is set equal to the sum of the measured energy of all pilots having energy greater than the pilot currently being tested. Thus, COMBINED_PILOT is determined by the equation:
N
COMBINED_PILOT= I PAi (2) i=i+i In block 222, the current pilot being tested is compared against a threshold (T) determined in accordance with the computed value of COMBINED_PILOT. In the exemplary embodiment, threshold T is determined in accordance with equation (1) above. If the measured pilot energy PAi exceeds threshold T, then the flow moves to block 224 and the drop timers for pilots PAi to PAN are reset to zero and determination of the revised active set ends in block 234.
If the measured pilot energy PAj does not exceed threshold T, then the flow moves to block 226. In block 226, it is determined whether the TDROP
timer for PAi has expired. If the TDROP timer has expired, then, in block 228, the pilot PAi is removed from the revised active set and put in the candidate set and the flow proceeds to block 230. If in block 226, it is determined that the TDROP timer for PAi has not expired, then the flow proceeds directly to block 230. In block 230, the loop variable (i) is incremented. Then, in block 232, it is determined whether all the pilots in the revised active set PAi have been tested. If all the pilots in the revised active set have been tested, then the flow proceeds to block 234 and generation of the revised active set is complete. If all the pilots in the revised active set have not been tested, then the flow proceeds to block 220 and proceeds as described above.
Referring now to FIGS. 7 and 8, a preferred method for implementing the present invention is illustrated. In the preferred embodiment, the mobile station monitors the pilot signals and in response to the monitored pilot signals the mobile station compiles members of the candidate set.
Moreover, mobile station determines whether a change to the current active set is desirable in view of the criteria discussed above. Upon detecting any change in the desired membership of the active set, the mobile station generates a pilot strength measurement message that as described above includes the identities of all pilots in the candidate and active sets corresponding measured energy values and a corresponding indication whether the pilot should remain in the sets or be dropped into the neighbor set (which is indicated by setting of the KEEP variable described earlier). In the exemplary embodiment, the base station determines the members of the revised active set in accordance with the method described with respect to FIG. 5.
The preferred embodiment provides for timely modification to the members of the active set and provides for determination of the members of the revised active set at the base station, which reduces computations at the mobile station and allows for the selection process to include capacity constraints of the base stations. Capacity constraints of the base stations can be taken into account by the base station controller simply by removing or weighting pilot signals which are transmitted by base stations under high capacity load conditions.
Control processor 62 provides the identities of the pilots and their corresponding measured pilot energies to message generator 70. Message generator 70 generates a Pilot Strength Measurement Message containing the information. The Pilot Strength Measurement Message is provided to transmitter (TMTR) 68, which encodes, modulates, upconverts and amplifies the message. The message is then transmitted through duplexer 52 and antenna 50.
Referring to FIG. 4, the Pilot Strength Measurement Message is received by antenna 30 of base station 4 and provided to receiver (RCVR) 28, which amplifies, down converts, demodulates and decodes the received signal and provides the message to base station controller (BSC) interface 26.
Base station controller (BSC) interface 26 sends the message to base station controller (BSC) 6. The message is provided to selector 22, which may also receive the message redundantly from other base stations which are in communication with mobile station 2. Selector 22 combines message estimates received from the base stations in communication with mobile station 2 to provide an improved packet estimates.
Selector 22 provides the power strength measurement message to hand-off control processor 20. In the first exemplary embodiment, hand-off control processor 20 selects the base stations which will communicate with mobile station 2, that is the members of the revised active set, in accordance with the method provided in FIG. 5.
In block 100, hand-off control processor 20 sorts pilots in the Pilot Strength Measurement Message according to their strengths. So, for example, Pl would be the strongest received pilot, P2 would be the second strongest pilot and so on. In block 102, the revised active set (ACTIVE_SET) is set to include P1 and P2. In block 104, the variable COMBINED-PILOT is set to the sum of the energies of P1 and P2. In block 106, the loop variable i is set to 3.
In block 108, the energy of the pilot signal of the ith strongest received signal (P;) is compared against a threshold value to determine whether it should be added to the revised active set. In the exemplary embodiment, the threshold (T) is determined in accordance with equation (1) below:
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT_INTERCEPT (1) In the exemplary embodiment, SOFT_SLOPE is set to 2.25 and SOFT_INTERCEPT is set to 3Ø The values of SOFT-SLOPE and 5 SOFT_INTERCEPT can be parameters that are sent over the air to the mobile station or selected values could be programmed into the mobile station. The values of SOFT_SLOPE and SOFT_INTERCEPT can be determined in accordance with factors such as the amount of soft handoff which is acceptable to a network manager and empirical studies on the 10 quality of transmission links. If the energy value Pi is less than the threshold value, then the flow proceeds to block 110 and the revised active set includes the signals corresponding to the pilots {P1... Pi-1 1.
If the energy value Pi is greater than the threshold value in block 108, then the flow proceeds to block 112. In block 112, a new COMBINED-PILOT
is computed by summing the value of the energy of the ith strongest signal in the pilot strength measurement message (Pi) with the current value of COMBINED_PILOT. Because in the exemplary embodiment, the energy of the pilot signals is provided in decibels, the energies must be converted to linear representations before being summed and put back into decibel form.
In block 114, Pi is added to the revised active set.
In block 116, the loop variable (i) is incremented. In block 118, hand off control processor 20 checks to determine whether all base stations in the pilot strength measurement message have been tested. If there are no remaining pilots to test, then the flow proceeds to block 120 and the revised active set comprises all the base stations in the pilot strength measurement message. If, in block 118, there are base stations in the pilot strength measurement message which remain to be tested, the flow returns to block 108 and proceeds as described above.
After generating the revised active set, base station controller 6 determines whether the base stations in the revised active list can accommodate communications with mobile station 2. If any of the base stations in the revised active set cannot accommodate communications with mobile station 2, they are removed from the revised active set. After generating the revised active set, hand-off control processor 20 provides the information to selector 22 indicating the members in the revised active set.
In response to the revised active set provided by hand-off control processor 20, selector 22 allocates traffic channels for performing communications to the mobile station using the base stations in the revised active set.
T T-Hand-off control processor 20 provides a message indicating the revised active set to message generator 24. Message generator 24 generates a message for transmission to mobile station 2, referred to as the handoff direction message. The handoff direction message indicates the base stations in the revised active set and corresponding channels those base stations will use to communicate with mobile station 2. The message is provided through selector 22 and provided to the base stations which were in communication with mobile station 2 prior to the generation of the revised active set. The base stations in communication with mobile station 2 transmit the handoff direction message to mobile station 2.
Referring back to FIG. 3, the handoff direction message is received by antenna 50 of mobile station 2. It is provided to receiver 54, which amplifies, downconverts, demodulates and decodes the message and provides it to control processor 62. Control processor 62, then, configures the traffic channel demodulators 64A-64N to demodulate traffic channels in accordance with the revised active set specified in the handoff direction message.
In an alternative embodiment of the present invention, the revised active set is generated at mobile station 2. This alternative embodiment, provides more timely generation of the revised active set. Because the Pilot Strength Measurement Message is only transmitted under the three conditions described above, update of the active set may be undesirably delayed. However, the alternative embodiment results in transmission of the pilot strength measurement message in a more timely fashion.
In the alternative embodiment, mobile station 2 measures received pilot energy as described above. The pilot energy values are provided to control process 62. In response, control processor 62 generates a revised active set. If the revised active set differs from the current active set, mobile station 2 transmits a message indicating the members of the revised active set to base station controller 6 through base stations 4. Base station controller 6 sets up communications with mobile station 2. Mobile station 2 reconfigures traffic channel demodulators 64A-64N to demodulate received signals in accordance with the mobile generated revised active set.
In the exemplary embodiment, control processor 62 in mobile station 2 generates the revised active set in accordance with the method shown in FIG. 6. In block 200, pilots with measured energy in excess of threshold TADD
are added to the candidate list and pilots who's measured energy has fallen below TDRoP for more that a predetermined time period are removed from the candidate list. In the exemplary embodiment, the time a pilot is below TDROP is tracked by a timer within control processor 62 referred to herein as the TDROP timer.
In block 202, the pilots in the candidate list are sorted from strongest to weakest. Thus, PC, is stronger than PC2, and so on. In block 204, the variable COMBINED_PILOT is set equal to the energy of all pilots in the active set. Also, in block 204, loop variable (i) is initialized to the value 1. In block 206, the candidate set member Pci is tested to determine whether it should be made part of the revised active set. Pc; is compared against a threshold generated in accordance with the current value of COMBINED_PILOT. In the exemplary embodiment, the threshold (T) is generated in accordance with equation (1) above.
If the pilot energy of Pc; exceeds threshold T, then the flow moves to block 208. In block 208, pilot Pc; is added to the revised active set. In block 210, a new value of COMBINED_PILOT is computed which is equal to the old value of COMBINED_PILOT plus the energy of pilot Pc;. In block 212, the loop variable (i) is incremented.
In block 213, it is determined whether all pilots in the candidate set have been tested. If all pilots in the candidate set have not been tested, then the flow moves to block 200 and proceeds as described above. If all pilots in the candidate set have been tested or if, back in block 206, the pilot energy of Pci did not exceed threshold T, then the flow moves to block 214. In block 214, the revised active set is sorted from lowest energy to highest energy.
Thus, PAl has the minimum measured energy in the revised active set, PA2 has the second lowest and so on up to the last member of the revised active set PAN.
In block 216, it is determined whether PAl is a member of the candidate set. If PA1 is a member of the candidate set then the flow moves to block 34 and the revision of the active set is complete. In block 218, loop variable i is set to 1. In block 220, COMBINED PILOT for testing PA; is computed. The value of COMBINED_PILOT is set equal to the sum of the measured energy of all pilots having energy greater than the pilot currently being tested. Thus, COMBINED_PILOT is determined by the equation:
N
COMBINED_PILOT= I PAi (2) i=i+i In block 222, the current pilot being tested is compared against a threshold (T) determined in accordance with the computed value of COMBINED_PILOT. In the exemplary embodiment, threshold T is determined in accordance with equation (1) above. If the measured pilot energy PAi exceeds threshold T, then the flow moves to block 224 and the drop timers for pilots PAi to PAN are reset to zero and determination of the revised active set ends in block 234.
If the measured pilot energy PAj does not exceed threshold T, then the flow moves to block 226. In block 226, it is determined whether the TDROP
timer for PAi has expired. If the TDROP timer has expired, then, in block 228, the pilot PAi is removed from the revised active set and put in the candidate set and the flow proceeds to block 230. If in block 226, it is determined that the TDROP timer for PAi has not expired, then the flow proceeds directly to block 230. In block 230, the loop variable (i) is incremented. Then, in block 232, it is determined whether all the pilots in the revised active set PAi have been tested. If all the pilots in the revised active set have been tested, then the flow proceeds to block 234 and generation of the revised active set is complete. If all the pilots in the revised active set have not been tested, then the flow proceeds to block 220 and proceeds as described above.
Referring now to FIGS. 7 and 8, a preferred method for implementing the present invention is illustrated. In the preferred embodiment, the mobile station monitors the pilot signals and in response to the monitored pilot signals the mobile station compiles members of the candidate set.
Moreover, mobile station determines whether a change to the current active set is desirable in view of the criteria discussed above. Upon detecting any change in the desired membership of the active set, the mobile station generates a pilot strength measurement message that as described above includes the identities of all pilots in the candidate and active sets corresponding measured energy values and a corresponding indication whether the pilot should remain in the sets or be dropped into the neighbor set (which is indicated by setting of the KEEP variable described earlier). In the exemplary embodiment, the base station determines the members of the revised active set in accordance with the method described with respect to FIG. 5.
The preferred embodiment provides for timely modification to the members of the active set and provides for determination of the members of the revised active set at the base station, which reduces computations at the mobile station and allows for the selection process to include capacity constraints of the base stations. Capacity constraints of the base stations can be taken into account by the base station controller simply by removing or weighting pilot signals which are transmitted by base stations under high capacity load conditions.
FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating the method for updating the candidate set, which in the exemplary embodiment is performed within the mobile station. In block 300, the loop variable (i) is initialized to the value 1.
In block 302, the pilots of the neighbor set (PN) are sorted such that PNI >
PNZ
> PN3, and so on. In block 306, the neighbor set pilot currently being tested (PN,) is compared with the threshold TADD. If the pilot signal energy (PN;) does not exceed the threshold, then, from block 306, the flow proceeds directly to block 312. If the pilot signal energy (PN;) exceeds the threshold in block 306 then in block 310 the pilot signal is added to the candidate set and the flow proceeds to block 308.
In block 308, the index number of the neighbor set pilot being tested is incremented. Then,. in block 304, it is determined whether all members of the neighbor set have been tested. If all members of the neighbor set have not been tested, then the flow moves to block 306 and proceeds as described before. If all members of the neighbor set have been tested, then the flow moves to block 312.
In block 312, the index variable (i) is reset to 1. Then, in block 314, the pilots in the candidate set (PC) are sorted from weakest to strongest, such that PC1 < PC2 < PC3, and so on. In block 318, the energy of the candidate list being tested (PC;) is compared to the drop threshold TDROP. If the energy is below the drop threshold, then the flow proceeds to block 324. If the energy is above the drop threshold, then the flow proceeds to block 320. Since the list of pilots is sorted, all the remaining members to be tested are necessarily greater than TDROP. So, in block 320, the TDROP timers for PC; and all pilots stronger than (Pc;) are reset and the update of the candidate set is complete.
As described above the TDROP timer is a timer that keeps track of the time that a pilot has been below the drop threshold. The purpose of the TDROP timer is to avoid mistakenly dropping a strong pilot which may have a weak measured energy due to short duration change in the propagation environment, such as a fast fade. In block 324, the TDROP timer is started if the timer for Pci is not already running or advanced if it is.
In block 326, a test made to determined whether the TDROP timer for the pilot (PC;) has expired. If the timer has expired, then the flow moves to block 328 and the pilot (PCi) is removed from the candidate set. Then the flow moves to block 322. Also, if the timer had not expired in block 326, the flow moves directly to block 322. In block 322, the candidate set index variable (i) is incremented. Then, in block, 316, it is determined whether all pilots in the candidate set have been tested. If all members of the candidate set have been tested the candidate set update is complete. If less than all members of the candidate set have been tested, the flow moves to block 314 and proceeds as described above.
In the preferred embodiment, the selection of the candidate set 5 members is performed in the mobile station. This is because selection of the candidate set, typically, does not require knowledge of capacity constraints of the base stations in the network. However, in an alternative embodiment, the method for dropping candidate set members to the neighbor set may be performed in the base station controller. Moreover, addition of members to 10 the candidate set could be performed in the base station controller provided the base station controller has knowledge of or is provided with knowledge of the members of the mobile station's neighbor set.
FIG. 8 illustrates the method for detecting the need to revise the active set, which in the preferred embodiment is performed in the mobile station.
In block 302, the pilots of the neighbor set (PN) are sorted such that PNI >
PNZ
> PN3, and so on. In block 306, the neighbor set pilot currently being tested (PN,) is compared with the threshold TADD. If the pilot signal energy (PN;) does not exceed the threshold, then, from block 306, the flow proceeds directly to block 312. If the pilot signal energy (PN;) exceeds the threshold in block 306 then in block 310 the pilot signal is added to the candidate set and the flow proceeds to block 308.
In block 308, the index number of the neighbor set pilot being tested is incremented. Then,. in block 304, it is determined whether all members of the neighbor set have been tested. If all members of the neighbor set have not been tested, then the flow moves to block 306 and proceeds as described before. If all members of the neighbor set have been tested, then the flow moves to block 312.
In block 312, the index variable (i) is reset to 1. Then, in block 314, the pilots in the candidate set (PC) are sorted from weakest to strongest, such that PC1 < PC2 < PC3, and so on. In block 318, the energy of the candidate list being tested (PC;) is compared to the drop threshold TDROP. If the energy is below the drop threshold, then the flow proceeds to block 324. If the energy is above the drop threshold, then the flow proceeds to block 320. Since the list of pilots is sorted, all the remaining members to be tested are necessarily greater than TDROP. So, in block 320, the TDROP timers for PC; and all pilots stronger than (Pc;) are reset and the update of the candidate set is complete.
As described above the TDROP timer is a timer that keeps track of the time that a pilot has been below the drop threshold. The purpose of the TDROP timer is to avoid mistakenly dropping a strong pilot which may have a weak measured energy due to short duration change in the propagation environment, such as a fast fade. In block 324, the TDROP timer is started if the timer for Pci is not already running or advanced if it is.
In block 326, a test made to determined whether the TDROP timer for the pilot (PC;) has expired. If the timer has expired, then the flow moves to block 328 and the pilot (PCi) is removed from the candidate set. Then the flow moves to block 322. Also, if the timer had not expired in block 326, the flow moves directly to block 322. In block 322, the candidate set index variable (i) is incremented. Then, in block, 316, it is determined whether all pilots in the candidate set have been tested. If all members of the candidate set have been tested the candidate set update is complete. If less than all members of the candidate set have been tested, the flow moves to block 314 and proceeds as described above.
In the preferred embodiment, the selection of the candidate set 5 members is performed in the mobile station. This is because selection of the candidate set, typically, does not require knowledge of capacity constraints of the base stations in the network. However, in an alternative embodiment, the method for dropping candidate set members to the neighbor set may be performed in the base station controller. Moreover, addition of members to 10 the candidate set could be performed in the base station controller provided the base station controller has knowledge of or is provided with knowledge of the members of the mobile station's neighbor set.
FIG. 8 illustrates the method for detecting the need to revise the active set, which in the preferred embodiment is performed in the mobile station.
15 In block 400, the strongest pilot in the candidate set (P'cl) is selected.
Note the prime is to differentiate the pilot from PC1 referred to in FIG. 7 which represented the weakest candidate set pilot. In block 402, the energy of (Pcl) is compared to a threshold (T) which is based on the cumulative energy of the pilots in the active set, as shown in Equation 3 below.
T = f(EPA;)= SOFT_SLOPE* EPA; +SOFT_ADD_INTERCEPT (3) If (P'cl) exceeds the threshold (T), then the mobile station transmits the pilot strength measurement message to the base station, in block 404.
If (P'cl) does not exceed the threshold (T), then the flow proceeds to block 406. In block 406, the active set is sorted from weakest pilot to strongest pilot. In block 408, the active set index variable (i) is set to 1. Then in block 410, the active set pilot (Paj), which is being tested to determine whether it should remain in the active set, is tested against a threshold (T) generated in accordance with a sum of energies of all stronger pilots as shown in equation (4) below:
T = f(y PAS )= SOFT_SLOPE* PAS +SOFT-DROP INTERCEPT (4) J>i r>i If the pilot being tested (PA;) exceeds the threshold (T), then it and all pilots of strength greater than it should remain in the active set. Thus, in block 412 the TDROP timers for all pilots with strength greater than PA; are reset and the current search for a revision of the active set is complete, with no need for revision detected by the mobile station. In the preferred embodiment, the intercept value (SOFT_ADD_INTERCEPT) used to generate the add threshold is permitted to be of a value different from the intercept value SOFT_DROP_INTERCEPT used to generate the drop threshold. This provides for greater flexibility and allows the network to introduce additional hysterisis into the signal levels.
If the pilot (PA) is less than the threshold (T), then the flow proceeds to block 422. In block 422, the TDROP timer for pilot (PA) is started if not running and advanced if already running. In block 424, whether the TDROP
timer for pilot (PA;) has expired is tested. If the TDROP timer has expired, then the mobile station transmits a pilot strength measurement message to the base station in block 430. If the TDROP timer has not expired, then the flow moves to block 426 where the active set pilot index (i) is advanced. Then, the flow moves to block 420, where it is determined whether all active set members have been tested. If all active set members have been tested, then the search ceases with no need to revise the active set detected. If less than all of the members of the active set have been tested, the flow moves to block 410 and proceeds as described previously.
The previous description of the preferred embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention.
The various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without the use of the inventive faculty.
Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
WE CLAIM:
11 T. _ L_
Note the prime is to differentiate the pilot from PC1 referred to in FIG. 7 which represented the weakest candidate set pilot. In block 402, the energy of (Pcl) is compared to a threshold (T) which is based on the cumulative energy of the pilots in the active set, as shown in Equation 3 below.
T = f(EPA;)= SOFT_SLOPE* EPA; +SOFT_ADD_INTERCEPT (3) If (P'cl) exceeds the threshold (T), then the mobile station transmits the pilot strength measurement message to the base station, in block 404.
If (P'cl) does not exceed the threshold (T), then the flow proceeds to block 406. In block 406, the active set is sorted from weakest pilot to strongest pilot. In block 408, the active set index variable (i) is set to 1. Then in block 410, the active set pilot (Paj), which is being tested to determine whether it should remain in the active set, is tested against a threshold (T) generated in accordance with a sum of energies of all stronger pilots as shown in equation (4) below:
T = f(y PAS )= SOFT_SLOPE* PAS +SOFT-DROP INTERCEPT (4) J>i r>i If the pilot being tested (PA;) exceeds the threshold (T), then it and all pilots of strength greater than it should remain in the active set. Thus, in block 412 the TDROP timers for all pilots with strength greater than PA; are reset and the current search for a revision of the active set is complete, with no need for revision detected by the mobile station. In the preferred embodiment, the intercept value (SOFT_ADD_INTERCEPT) used to generate the add threshold is permitted to be of a value different from the intercept value SOFT_DROP_INTERCEPT used to generate the drop threshold. This provides for greater flexibility and allows the network to introduce additional hysterisis into the signal levels.
If the pilot (PA) is less than the threshold (T), then the flow proceeds to block 422. In block 422, the TDROP timer for pilot (PA) is started if not running and advanced if already running. In block 424, whether the TDROP
timer for pilot (PA;) has expired is tested. If the TDROP timer has expired, then the mobile station transmits a pilot strength measurement message to the base station in block 430. If the TDROP timer has not expired, then the flow moves to block 426 where the active set pilot index (i) is advanced. Then, the flow moves to block 420, where it is determined whether all active set members have been tested. If all active set members have been tested, then the search ceases with no need to revise the active set detected. If less than all of the members of the active set have been tested, the flow moves to block 410 and proceeds as described previously.
The previous description of the preferred embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention.
The various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without the use of the inventive faculty.
Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
WE CLAIM:
11 T. _ L_
Claims (63)
1. A method for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station comprising:
computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station;
comparing a signal energy measurement of a first base station with said threshold value; and selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value;
wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than said first base station.
computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station;
comparing a signal energy measurement of a first base station with said threshold value; and selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value;
wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than said first base station.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of computing a threshold value comprises performing a linear operation upon said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station.
3. In a wireless communications system wherein a first base station transmits a first pilot signal and a first traffic signal, and a second base station transmits a second pilot signal and a second traffic signal, and a remote station receives said first pilot signal and said first traffic signal, a method for determining whether to add a third base station to an Active Set of said remote station, comprising the steps of:
demodulating said first pilot signal;
measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal;
generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy;
demodulating said second pilot signal;
measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal;
comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold;
adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated second pilot signal energy exceeds said threshold;
generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal energy;
demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station;
measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal;
comparing said demodulated third pilot signal energy with said revised threshold; and adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
demodulating said first pilot signal;
measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal;
generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy;
demodulating said second pilot signal;
measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal;
comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold;
adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated second pilot signal energy exceeds said threshold;
generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal energy;
demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station;
measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal;
comparing said demodulated third pilot signal energy with said revised threshold; and adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
4. In a wireless communications system in which a plurality of base stations are in communication with a base station controller, a method for determining an Active Set of base stations to communicate with a remote station at said base station controller, comprising the steps of:
receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station;
selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations;
calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station;
selecting a second base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value;
summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations;
determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station;
selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations;
calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station;
selecting a second base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value;
summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations;
determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein said step of revised determining said threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths, comprises the steps of:
multiplying said summed signal strengths by a predetermined scaling value; and adding a predetermined value to said product.
multiplying said summed signal strengths by a predetermined scaling value; and adding a predetermined value to said product.
6. An apparatus for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station comprising:
means for computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station, wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than a first base station;
means for comparing a signal energy measurement of said first base station with said threshold value; and means for selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value.
means for computing a threshold value in accordance with a combination of measurements of signal energies from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station, wherein said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station comprises the sum of pilot energy values of pilot with greater received energy than a first base station;
means for comparing a signal energy measurement of said first base station with said threshold value; and means for selecting said first base station when said signal energy measurement of said first base station exceeds said threshold value.
7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein said means for computing a threshold value is further for performing a linear operation upon said combination of signal energy measurements from base stations capable of communicating with said remote station.
8. In a wireless communications system wherein a first base station transmits a first pilot signal and a first traffic signal, and a second base station transmits a second pilot signal and a second traffic signal, and a remote station receives said first pilot signal and said first traffic signal, an apparatus for determining whether to add a third base station to an Active Set of said remote station, comprising:
means for demodulating said first pilot signal;
means for measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal;
means for generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy;
means for demodulating said second pilot signal;
means for measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal;
means for comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold;
means for adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated second pilot signal energy exceeds said threshold;
means for generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal energy;
means for demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station;
means for measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal;
means for comparing said demodulated third pilot signal energy with said revised threshold; and means for adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
means for demodulating said first pilot signal;
means for measuring the energy of said demodulated first pilot signal;
means for generating a threshold in accordance with said demodulated first pilot signal energy;
means for demodulating said second pilot signal;
means for measuring the energy of said demodulated second pilot signal;
means for comparing said demodulated second pilot signal energy with said threshold;
means for adding said second base station to said Active Set when said demodulated second pilot signal energy exceeds said threshold;
means for generating a revised threshold in accordance with a combination of said demodulated first pilot signal energy and said demodulated second pilot signal energy;
means for demodulating a third pilot signal from said third base station;
means for measuring the energy of said demodulated third pilot signal;
means for comparing said demodulated third pilot signal energy with said revised threshold; and means for adding said third base station to said Active Set when said demodulated third pilot signal energy exceeds said revised threshold.
9. In a wireless communications system in which a plurality of base stations are in communication with a base station controller, an apparatus for determining an Active Set of base stations to communicate with a remote station at said base station controller, comprising:
means for receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station;
means for selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations;
means for calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station;
means for selecting a second base station as a.
member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value;
means for summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations; and means for determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and means for determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
means for receiving a signal strength measurement message indicative of the signal strengths associated with each of said plurality of base stations as measured at said remote station;
means for selecting a first base station as a member of said Active Set of base stations;
means for calculating a threshold value in accordance with a signal strength of said selected first base station;
means for selecting a second base station as a.
member of said Active Set of base stations in accordance with said threshold value;
means for summing the signal strengths associated with each of said two selected base stations; and means for determining a revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths; and means for determining remaining members of said Active Set in accordance with said revised threshold value.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein said means for determining said revised threshold value in accordance with said summed signal strengths is further for multiplying said summed signal strengths by a predetermined scaling value and adding a predetermined value to said product.
11. An apparatus for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system, comprising a processor configured to:
sort a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set;
sum a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum;
determine a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum;
select a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values;
compare the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value;
decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
sort a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set;
sum a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum;
determine a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum;
select a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values;
compare the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value;
decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and decide that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, further comprising a message generator that is controlled by the processor to transmit a message to a base station controller if the processor decides that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision, wherein the message carries information regarding the plurality of pilot energy values.
13. The apparatus of claim 12', wherein the selected pilot energy value is selected from a Candidate Set (CS).
14. The apparatus of claim 13, wherein the first pilot set is an Active Set (AS).
15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the processor is configured to sum the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted Active Set by summing all members of the Active Set.
16. The apparatus of claim 15, wherein the plurality of AS pilot energy values are sorted from the weakest to the strongest.
17. The apparatus of claim 16, wherein the processor is further configured to sort a plurality of Candidate Set pilot energy values from the strongest to the weakest before selecting the pilot energy value from the Candidate Set, wherein the strongest pilot energy value is selected from the Candidate Set.
18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the processor is further configured to:
select an AS pilot energy value from the sorted AS;
sum all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value to form a combined AS pilot energy sum;
determine an AS threshold value in accordance with the combined AS pilot energy sum;
compare the selected AS pilot energy value to the AS threshold value;
reset a drop timer if the selected AS pilot energy value exceeds the AS threshold value and store the selected AS pilot energy value and all pilot energy values of the AS stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value; and advance a drop timer for the selected AS pilot energy value if the selected AS pilot energy value does not exceed the AS threshold value.
select an AS pilot energy value from the sorted AS;
sum all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value to form a combined AS pilot energy sum;
determine an AS threshold value in accordance with the combined AS pilot energy sum;
compare the selected AS pilot energy value to the AS threshold value;
reset a drop timer if the selected AS pilot energy value exceeds the AS threshold value and store the selected AS pilot energy value and all pilot energy values of the AS stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value; and advance a drop timer for the selected AS pilot energy value if the selected AS pilot energy value does not exceed the AS threshold value.
19. The apparatus of claim 18, further comprising a message generator communicatively coupled to the processor, wherein, if the drop timer has expired then the processor causes the message generator to send a pilot strength measurement message to a base station controller.
20. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein if the drop timer has not expired, then the processor is further configured to select a next AS pilot energy value from the sorted Active Set, sum all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the next selected AS pilot energy value, determine a new AS threshold value, compare the next selected AS pilot energy value to the new AS threshold value, and repeat the above steps until the drop timer is expired.
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the processor is located within the mobile station.
22. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the threshold value is determined in accordance with the following relationship:
T=SOFT SLOPE*COMBINED PILOT+SOFT ADD INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED-PILOT represents the combined pilot energy sum, and SOFT_SLOPE and SOFT-ADD-INTERCEPT are system parameters.
T=SOFT SLOPE*COMBINED PILOT+SOFT ADD INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED-PILOT represents the combined pilot energy sum, and SOFT_SLOPE and SOFT-ADD-INTERCEPT are system parameters.
23. The apparatus of claim 22, wherein the AS threshold value is determined in accordance with the following relationship:
T=SOFT SLOPE*COMBINED PILOT+SOFT DROP INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED PILOT represents the sum of all pilot energy values of the Active set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value, and SOFT-SLOPE and SOFT-DROP-INTERCEPT are system parameters.
T=SOFT SLOPE*COMBINED PILOT+SOFT DROP INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED PILOT represents the sum of all pilot energy values of the Active set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value, and SOFT-SLOPE and SOFT-DROP-INTERCEPT are system parameters.
24. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein if the processor decides that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision, then the processor is further configured to:
include the selected pilot energy value within the combined pilot energy sum to form a revised combined pilot energy sum;
determine a revised threshold value in accordance with the revised combined pilot energy sum; and select the next pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values, wherein the above steps repeat until a selected pilot energy value does not exceed a revised threshold value.
include the selected pilot energy value within the combined pilot energy sum to form a revised combined pilot energy sum;
determine a revised threshold value in accordance with the revised combined pilot energy sum; and select the next pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values, wherein the above steps repeat until a selected pilot energy value does not exceed a revised threshold value.
25. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values is designated as an Active Set (AS).
26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the processor sorts the plurality of pilot energy values from the strongest pilot energy value of the first pilot set to the weakest pilot energy value of the first pilot set.
27. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the processor is located within the mobile station.
28. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the processor causes the message generator to send a plot strength measurement message to a base station controller if the Active Set is different from a current Active Set.
29. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the processor is located within a base station controller.
30. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the processor is further configured to remove from the Active Set a pilot energy value associated with a base station with a high capacity load condition.
31. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the processor is further configured to weigh the selected pilot energy value if the selected pilot energy value is associated with a base station with a high capacity load condition.
32. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein determining the threshold value is performed in accordance to a linear operation.
33. The apparatus of claim 32, wherein the threshold value is determined in accordance with the following relationship:
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT_INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED-PILOT represents the combined pilot energy sum, and SOFT-SLOPE and SOFT_INTERCEPT are system parameters.
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT_INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED-PILOT represents the combined pilot energy sum, and SOFT-SLOPE and SOFT_INTERCEPT are system parameters.
34. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the SOFT SLOPE
and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameters are preprogrammed within the mobile station.
and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameters are preprogrammed within the mobile station.
35. The apparatus of claim 34, wherein the SOFT SLOPE
parameter is set to 2.25 and SOFT INTERCEPT parameter is set to 3Ø
parameter is set to 2.25 and SOFT INTERCEPT parameter is set to 3Ø
36. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the SOFT SLOPE
and SOFT INTERCEPT parameters are transmitted from a base station controller to the mobile station.
and SOFT INTERCEPT parameters are transmitted from a base station controller to the mobile station.
37. The apparatus of claim 33, wherein the selected pilot energy value is selected from a Candidate Set (CS).
38. The apparatus of claim 37, wherein the first pilot set is an Active Set (AS).
39. The apparatus of claim 38, wherein summing the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted Active Set sums all members of the Active Set.
40. The apparatus of claim 39, wherein the plurality of AS pilot energy values are sorted from the weakest to the strongest.
41. The apparatus of claim 40, wherein the processor is further configured to sort a plurality of Candidate Set pilot energy values from the strongest to the weakest before selecting the pilot energy value from the Candidate Set, wherein selecting occurs at the strongest pilot energy value.
42. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein the processor is further configured to:
select an AS pilot energy value from the sorted AS;
sum all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value to form a combined AS pilot energy sum;
determine an AS threshold value in accordance with the combined AS pilot energy sum;
compare the selected AS pilot energy value to the AS threshold value;
reset a drop timer if the selected AS pilot energy value exceeds the AS threshold value and store the selected AS pilot energy value and all pilot energy values of the AS stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value; and advance a drop timer for the selected AS pilot energy value if the selected AS pilot energy value does not exceed the AS threshold value.
select an AS pilot energy value from the sorted AS;
sum all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value to form a combined AS pilot energy sum;
determine an AS threshold value in accordance with the combined AS pilot energy sum;
compare the selected AS pilot energy value to the AS threshold value;
reset a drop timer if the selected AS pilot energy value exceeds the AS threshold value and store the selected AS pilot energy value and all pilot energy values of the AS stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value; and advance a drop timer for the selected AS pilot energy value if the selected AS pilot energy value does not exceed the AS threshold value.
43. The apparatus of claim 42, wherein if the drop timer has expired, then the processor removes the selected AS pilot energy value from the AS.
44. The apparatus of claim 43, wherein if the drop timer has not expired, then the processor is further configured to:
select a next AS pilot energy value from the sorted Active Set;
sum all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the next selected AS pilot energy value;
determine a new AS threshold value;
compare the next selected AS pilot energy value to the new AS threshold value; and repeat the above steps until the drop timer is expired.
select a next AS pilot energy value from the sorted Active Set;
sum all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the next selected AS pilot energy value;
determine a new AS threshold value;
compare the next selected AS pilot energy value to the new AS threshold value; and repeat the above steps until the drop timer is expired.
45. The apparatus of claim 44, wherein the processor is located within the mobile station.
46. The apparatus of claim 45, further comprising a message generator that is controlled by the processor to transmit a message to a base station controller if the processor decides the Active Set is different from a current Active Set.
47. The apparatus of claim 45, further comprising a message generator that is controlled by the processor to transmit a message to a base station controller if the processor decides the Candidate Set is different from a current Candidate Set.
48. The apparatus of claim 44, wherein the processor is located within a base station controller.
49. The apparatus of claim 48, wherein the processor is further configured to remove from the Active Set a pilot energy value associated with a base station with a high capacity load condition.
50. The apparatus of claim 48, wherein the processor is further configured to weigh the selected AS pilot energy value if the selected AS pilot energy value is associated with a base station with a high capacity load condition.
51. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein determining the threshold value is performed in accordance to a linear operation.
52. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the threshold value is determined in accordance with the following relationship:
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT_INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED PILOT represents the combined pilot energy sum, and SOFT SLOPE and SOFT INTERCEPT are system parameters.
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT_INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED PILOT represents the combined pilot energy sum, and SOFT SLOPE and SOFT INTERCEPT are system parameters.
53. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the SOFT_SLOPE
and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameters are preprogrammed within the mobile station.
and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameters are preprogrammed within the mobile station.
54. The apparatus of claim 53, wherein the SOFT_SLOPE
parameter is set to 2.25 and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameter is set to 3Ø
parameter is set to 2.25 and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameter is set to 3Ø
55. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the SOFT_SLOPE
and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameters are transmitted from a base station controller to the mobile station.
and SOFT_INTERCEPT parameters are transmitted from a base station controller to the mobile station.
56. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the AS
threshold value is determined in accordance with the following relationship:
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT-_INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED_PILOT represents the sum of all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value, and SOFT_SLOPE and SOFT_INTERCEPT are system parameters.
threshold value is determined in accordance with the following relationship:
T=SOFT_SLOPE*COMBINED_PILOT+SOFT-_INTERCEPT, wherein COMBINED_PILOT represents the sum of all pilot energy values of the Active Set stronger than the selected AS pilot energy value, and SOFT_SLOPE and SOFT_INTERCEPT are system parameters.
57. An apparatus for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system by timely updating pilot energies from base stations, comprising:
a processor for summing a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum, and for determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum, wherein the threshold value is updated to incorporate pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value and the first pilot set is revised to incorporate base stations associated with the pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value; and a generator for generating a message carrying first pilot set information.
a processor for summing a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum, and for determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum, wherein the threshold value is updated to incorporate pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value and the first pilot set is revised to incorporate base stations associated with the pilot energy values that exceed the threshold value; and a generator for generating a message carrying first pilot set information.
58. The apparatus of claim 57, wherein the processor is further for sorting a plurality of pilot energy values in the first pilot set.
59. The apparatus of claim 57, wherein the processor is further for:
selecting a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values; and comparing the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value to decide whether to revise the first pilot set.
selecting a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values; and comparing the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value to decide whether to revise the first pilot set.
60. The apparatus of claim 59, wherein if the compared pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value, then deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum need not include the compared pilot energy value so that the first pilot set need not be revised.
61. The apparatus of claim 59, wherein if the compared pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value, then deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs to include the compared pilot energy value so that the first pilot set needs to be revised.
62. A method for facilitating handoff of a mobile station within a wireless communication system, comprising:
sorting a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set;
summing a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum;
determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum;
selecting a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values;
comparing the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value;
deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
sorting a plurality of pilot energy values in a first pilot set;
summing a portion of the plurality of pilot energy values in the sorted first pilot set to determine a combined pilot energy sum;
determining a threshold value in accordance with the combined pilot energy sum;
selecting a pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values;
comparing the selected pilot energy value to the threshold value;
deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum does not need revision if the selected pilot energy value does not exceed the threshold value; and deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision if the selected pilot energy value exceeds the threshold value.
63. The method of claim 62, wherein deciding that the portion of the plurality of pilot energy values forming the combined pilot energy sum needs revision comprises:
including the selected pilot energy value within the combined pilot energy sum to form a revised combined pilot energy sum;
determining a revised threshold value in accordance with the revised combined pilot energy sum; and selecting the next pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values, wherein the above steps repeat until a selected pilot energy value does not exceed a revised threshold value.
including the selected pilot energy value within the combined pilot energy sum to form a revised combined pilot energy sum;
determining a revised threshold value in accordance with the revised combined pilot energy sum; and selecting the next pilot energy value that is not a member of the summed portion of the plurality of pilot energy values, wherein the above steps repeat until a selected pilot energy value does not exceed a revised threshold value.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2602361A CA2602361C (en) | 1997-01-29 | 1998-01-27 | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wirless communication system |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US08/790,497 US6151502A (en) | 1997-01-29 | 1997-01-29 | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system |
| US08/790,497 | 1997-01-29 | ||
| PCT/US1998/001058 WO1998033288A2 (en) | 1997-01-29 | 1998-01-27 | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system |
Related Child Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2602361A Division CA2602361C (en) | 1997-01-29 | 1998-01-27 | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wirless communication system |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2279314A1 CA2279314A1 (en) | 1998-07-30 |
| CA2279314C true CA2279314C (en) | 2010-11-16 |
Family
ID=25150859
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA2279314A Expired - Lifetime CA2279314C (en) | 1997-01-29 | 1998-01-27 | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system |
Country Status (23)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US6151502A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0956732B1 (en) |
| JP (1) | JP4027989B2 (en) |
| KR (2) | KR100561658B1 (en) |
| CN (1) | CN1168345C (en) |
| AR (1) | AR011591A1 (en) |
| AT (1) | ATE301376T1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU6032398A (en) |
| BR (1) | BRPI9807027B1 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2279314C (en) |
| DE (1) | DE69831058T2 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK0956732T3 (en) |
| ES (1) | ES2245018T3 (en) |
| FI (1) | FI19991648A (en) |
| ID (1) | ID24950A (en) |
| IL (1) | IL131091A (en) |
| MY (1) | MY118178A (en) |
| NO (1) | NO324444B1 (en) |
| PT (1) | PT956732E (en) |
| RU (1) | RU2217871C2 (en) |
| TW (1) | TW546971B (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1998033288A2 (en) |
| ZA (1) | ZA98700B (en) |
Families Citing this family (99)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US6141555A (en) * | 1997-06-09 | 2000-10-31 | Nec Corporation | Cellular communication system, and mobile and base stations used in the same |
| JP3693083B2 (en) * | 1997-07-02 | 2005-09-07 | ソニー株式会社 | Receiving device and receiving method |
| KR100265855B1 (en) * | 1997-07-10 | 2000-09-15 | 정선종 | Method for processing handoff call in wireless communication system |
| US6754497B1 (en) * | 1997-10-09 | 2004-06-22 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Seamless handoff system and method |
| US9118387B2 (en) | 1997-11-03 | 2015-08-25 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilot reference transmission for a wireless communication system |
| US7184426B2 (en) * | 2002-12-12 | 2007-02-27 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for burst pilot for a time division multiplex system |
| JP3990016B2 (en) * | 1998-01-22 | 2007-10-10 | 富士通株式会社 | CDMA soft handoff control method |
| US6603751B1 (en) * | 1998-02-13 | 2003-08-05 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for performing a handoff in a wireless communication system, such as a hard handoff |
| WO1999041925A1 (en) * | 1998-02-16 | 1999-08-19 | Nokia Networks Oy | Method and system for performing handover in a mobile communication system |
| KR100326330B1 (en) * | 1998-05-08 | 2002-06-26 | 윤종용 | Hand-off apparatus for mobile communication system and method therefor |
| US6381458B1 (en) * | 1998-05-15 | 2002-04-30 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method and system for soft handoff control based on access network capacity |
| US20030194033A1 (en) * | 1998-05-21 | 2003-10-16 | Tiedemann Edward G. | Method and apparatus for coordinating transmission of short messages with hard handoff searches in a wireless communications system |
| JP2984653B1 (en) * | 1998-06-11 | 1999-11-29 | 埼玉日本電気株式会社 | Base station wireless device for CDMA cellular system |
| US6353602B1 (en) * | 1998-08-07 | 2002-03-05 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | CDMA base station assisted soft handoff |
| JP3204310B2 (en) * | 1998-08-12 | 2001-09-04 | 日本電気株式会社 | CDMA mobile communication system and downlink transmission power control method thereof |
| US6360100B1 (en) * | 1998-09-22 | 2002-03-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method for robust handoff in wireless communication system |
| GB2343330A (en) * | 1998-10-29 | 2000-05-03 | Fujitsu Ltd | Soft handoff method using a backup link |
| JP2978920B1 (en) * | 1998-11-09 | 1999-11-15 | 埼玉日本電気株式会社 | Transmission power control method and system in CDMA base station |
| FI109956B (en) * | 1998-12-16 | 2002-10-31 | Nokia Corp | Procedure for communication of neighbor cell information and systems according to methods and mobile telephone |
| US6587446B2 (en) | 1999-02-11 | 2003-07-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Handoff in a wireless communication system |
| US6240290B1 (en) | 1999-03-04 | 2001-05-29 | Harris Corporation | Base station hand-off mechanism for cellular communication system |
| KR100291038B1 (en) * | 1999-03-12 | 2001-05-15 | 윤종용 | Method for searching target frequency of mobile station in cellular system |
| US6907243B1 (en) * | 1999-06-09 | 2005-06-14 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and system for dynamic soft handoff resource allocation in a wireless network |
| US6594243B1 (en) * | 1999-07-15 | 2003-07-15 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Methods and apparatus for enhanced soft handoff in a CDMA wireless communication system |
| US8064409B1 (en) | 1999-08-25 | 2011-11-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus using a multi-carrier forward link in a wireless communication system |
| AU7129600A (en) * | 1999-09-08 | 2001-04-10 | Motorola, Inc. | Packet transmission method |
| US6711420B1 (en) * | 1999-09-15 | 2004-03-23 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Modified finger assignment algorithm for high data rate calls |
| US6621804B1 (en) | 1999-10-07 | 2003-09-16 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for predicting favored supplemental channel transmission slots using transmission power measurements of a fundamental channel |
| DE19961516A1 (en) * | 1999-12-20 | 2001-07-05 | Siemens Ag | Method for controlling connection forwarding in a radio communication system |
| US6442395B1 (en) * | 1999-12-22 | 2002-08-27 | Ericsson Inc. | Modified directed retry feature |
| KR100350476B1 (en) * | 1999-12-30 | 2002-08-28 | 삼성전자 주식회사 | apparatus and method for implementing hand-off in cdma communication system |
| US6625467B2 (en) * | 2000-07-13 | 2003-09-23 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for performing idle mode reacquisition and handoff in an asynchronous communication system |
| US7193981B1 (en) * | 2000-07-25 | 2007-03-20 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method of processing soft handoff information at a base station |
| US7016322B1 (en) | 2000-09-25 | 2006-03-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Generating graded packets for packet voting in wireless communications systems |
| US7061886B1 (en) | 2000-09-25 | 2006-06-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Packet voting in wireless communications systems |
| US7088695B1 (en) * | 2000-09-25 | 2006-08-08 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Packet voting in wireless mobile devices |
| CN1159931C (en) * | 2000-10-02 | 2004-07-28 | 株式会社Ntt都科摩 | Mobile communication system, base mobile station, and method for controlling mobile communication |
| US7054631B2 (en) * | 2000-10-23 | 2006-05-30 | Denso Corporation | Enhancement of soft handoff in a mobile wireless network through the use of dynamic information feedback from mobile users |
| US6973098B1 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2005-12-06 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for determining a data rate in a high rate packet data wireless communications system |
| US7068683B1 (en) | 2000-10-25 | 2006-06-27 | Qualcomm, Incorporated | Method and apparatus for high rate packet data and low delay data transmissions |
| US6968186B2 (en) * | 2000-11-30 | 2005-11-22 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | System and method for preventing dropped calls |
| US6850499B2 (en) | 2001-01-05 | 2005-02-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for forward power control in a communication system |
| US7016325B2 (en) * | 2001-01-18 | 2006-03-21 | Strix Systems, Inc. | Link context mobility method and system for providing such mobility, such as a system employing short range frequency hopping spread spectrum wireless protocols |
| US7006828B1 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2006-02-28 | Via Telecom Co. Ltd. | Method and apparatus for performing cell selection handoffs in a wireless communication system |
| US7006483B2 (en) | 2001-02-23 | 2006-02-28 | Ipr Licensing, Inc. | Qualifying available reverse link coding rates from access channel power setting |
| US7023810B1 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2006-04-04 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Decoding using redundant packet selection information in wireless communications systems |
| US7103019B1 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2006-09-05 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Error correction using redundant packet streams in wireless communications systems |
| US6909698B1 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2005-06-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Redundant packet selection based on packet content in wireless communications systems |
| US6944123B1 (en) | 2001-03-21 | 2005-09-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Redundant packet selection and manipulation in wireless communications systems |
| KR100395510B1 (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2003-08-25 | 주식회사 하이닉스반도체 | Method for Call Processing for Channel Assignment into Soft/Softer Handoff in Access Handoff |
| US6978144B1 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2005-12-20 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and system for managing real-time bandwidth in a wireless network |
| US7151757B2 (en) * | 2001-05-02 | 2006-12-19 | Strix Systems, Inc. | Wireless base station to base station synchronization in a communication system, such as a system employing a short-range frequency hopping or time division duplex scheme |
| US7194010B2 (en) * | 2001-05-02 | 2007-03-20 | Strix Systems, Inc. | Wireless base station to base station synchronization in a communication system, such as a system employing a short range frequency hopping or time division duplex scheme |
| WO2002103988A1 (en) * | 2001-05-02 | 2002-12-27 | Strix Systems, Inc. | Wireless base station neighbor discovery in a communication system employing a short-range frequency hopping scheme |
| US7058035B2 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2006-06-06 | Qualcomm, Indorporated | Communication system employing multiple handoff criteria |
| EP1283651A1 (en) * | 2001-08-06 | 2003-02-12 | Motorola, Inc. | A method and apparatus for handover in a CDMA cellular communication system |
| US6980820B2 (en) | 2001-08-20 | 2005-12-27 | Qualcomm Inc. | Method and system for signaling in broadcast communication system |
| US6731936B2 (en) * | 2001-08-20 | 2004-05-04 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for a handoff in a broadcast communication system |
| KR100433899B1 (en) * | 2002-01-14 | 2004-06-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for determining soft hand-over in cdma mobile communication system |
| TWI343195B (en) * | 2002-03-25 | 2011-06-01 | Interdigital Tech Corp | Method and apparatus for blind code detection |
| US7593367B2 (en) * | 2002-06-14 | 2009-09-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Frequency scan for CDMA acquisition |
| WO2004014097A1 (en) * | 2002-07-31 | 2004-02-12 | Nortel Networks Limited, | Adaptive dual-mode reverse link scheduling method for wireless telecommunications networks |
| KR100531841B1 (en) * | 2002-11-13 | 2005-12-02 | 엘지전자 주식회사 | Method for constructing a transmission message in cdma terminal |
| US7668541B2 (en) | 2003-01-31 | 2010-02-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Enhanced techniques for using core based nodes for state transfer |
| US20050020273A1 (en) * | 2003-07-24 | 2005-01-27 | Nortel Networks Limited | Adaptive dual-mode reverse link scheduling method for wireless telecommunications networks |
| US7912485B2 (en) | 2003-09-11 | 2011-03-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for signaling in broadcast communication system |
| US7853215B2 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2010-12-14 | Motorola, Inc. | Communication circuit and method for selecting a reference link |
| KR100810333B1 (en) * | 2004-06-15 | 2008-03-04 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Apparatus and method for supporting soft handover in a broadband wireless access communication system |
| KR100965694B1 (en) | 2004-06-15 | 2010-06-24 | 삼성전자주식회사 | System and method for supporting soft handover in a broadband wireless access communication system |
| US20060019663A1 (en) * | 2004-07-12 | 2006-01-26 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Robust and fast handover in a wireless local area network |
| JP4448403B2 (en) * | 2004-08-16 | 2010-04-07 | 富士通株式会社 | Power level measuring apparatus and mobile station |
| US7684373B2 (en) * | 2004-09-02 | 2010-03-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Coverage determination and switching between overlay communication systems |
| KR20060030428A (en) * | 2004-10-05 | 2006-04-10 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and system for controlling hard handoff in mobile network |
| US7738871B2 (en) * | 2004-11-05 | 2010-06-15 | Interdigital Technology Corporation | Wireless communication method and system for implementing media independent handover between technologically diversified access networks |
| US8086241B2 (en) * | 2004-11-18 | 2011-12-27 | Mediatek Incorporation | Handoff methods, and devices utilizing same |
| US20070021086A1 (en) * | 2005-07-22 | 2007-01-25 | Industrial Technology Research Institute | Method for path selection and signal processing in wireless communications system |
| US8670415B2 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2014-03-11 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method for performing handoff in a communication system |
| US8982835B2 (en) | 2005-09-19 | 2015-03-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Provision of a move indication to a resource requester |
| US8983468B2 (en) | 2005-12-22 | 2015-03-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Communications methods and apparatus using physical attachment point identifiers |
| US9066344B2 (en) | 2005-09-19 | 2015-06-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | State synchronization of access routers |
| US8982778B2 (en) | 2005-09-19 | 2015-03-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Packet routing in a wireless communications environment |
| US9736752B2 (en) | 2005-12-22 | 2017-08-15 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Communications methods and apparatus using physical attachment point identifiers which support dual communications links |
| US9078084B2 (en) | 2005-12-22 | 2015-07-07 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for end node assisted neighbor discovery |
| US8509799B2 (en) | 2005-09-19 | 2013-08-13 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Provision of QoS treatment based upon multiple requests |
| US8547948B2 (en) * | 2005-10-06 | 2013-10-01 | Lockheed Martin Corporation | Antenna management system |
| US20090207790A1 (en) * | 2005-10-27 | 2009-08-20 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for settingtuneawaystatus in an open state in wireless communication system |
| KR101172916B1 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2012-08-10 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Handoff control method and apparatus of a mobile terminal in a code division multiple access system |
| US9083355B2 (en) | 2006-02-24 | 2015-07-14 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for end node assisted neighbor discovery |
| CN101351975B (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2015-06-24 | 三菱电机株式会社 | Data communication method and mobile communication system |
| US9155008B2 (en) | 2007-03-26 | 2015-10-06 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Apparatus and method of performing a handoff in a communication network |
| US8437281B2 (en) * | 2007-03-27 | 2013-05-07 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Distributed real-time data mixing for conferencing |
| US8830818B2 (en) | 2007-06-07 | 2014-09-09 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Forward handover under radio link failure |
| US9094173B2 (en) | 2007-06-25 | 2015-07-28 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Recovery from handoff error due to false detection of handoff completion signal at access terminal |
| US8964692B2 (en) | 2008-11-10 | 2015-02-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Spectrum sensing of bluetooth using a sequence of energy detection measurements |
| US8811200B2 (en) | 2009-09-22 | 2014-08-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Physical layer metrics to support adaptive station-dependent channel state information feedback rate in multi-user communication systems |
| US8615241B2 (en) | 2010-04-09 | 2013-12-24 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Methods and apparatus for facilitating robust forward handover in long term evolution (LTE) communication systems |
| KR101318013B1 (en) * | 2010-08-30 | 2013-10-14 | 주식회사 팬택 | Terminal having simple transfer mode and network connecting method using the same |
| US20140274050A1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2014-09-18 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Cell reselection with performance-based suitability criterion |
| KR20190029392A (en) | 2017-09-11 | 2019-03-20 | 강은 | waist-heating mat using ceramic blocks |
Family Cites Families (40)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE2048056C1 (en) * | 1970-09-30 | 1978-10-19 | Siemens Ag, 1000 Berlin Und 8000 Muenchen | Receiver for electrical oscillations modulated in SSMA technology |
| US4112257A (en) * | 1977-03-24 | 1978-09-05 | Frost Edward G | Comprehensive automatic mobile radio telephone system |
| US4868795A (en) * | 1985-08-05 | 1989-09-19 | Terra Marine Engineering, Inc. | Power leveling telemetry system |
| FR2592256B1 (en) * | 1985-12-20 | 1988-02-12 | Trt Telecom Radio Electr | DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING THE TRANSMIT POWER OF A RADIO BEAM |
| DE3607687A1 (en) * | 1986-03-08 | 1987-09-10 | Philips Patentverwaltung | METHOD AND CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENT FOR SWITCHING A RADIO CONNECTION INTO ANOTHER RADIO CELL OF A DIGITAL RADIO TRANSMISSION SYSTEM |
| FR2595889B1 (en) * | 1986-03-14 | 1988-05-06 | Havel Christophe | TRANSMISSION POWER CONTROL DEVICE IN A RADIO COMMUNICATION TRANSCEIVER STATION |
| US4901307A (en) * | 1986-10-17 | 1990-02-13 | Qualcomm, Inc. | Spread spectrum multiple access communication system using satellite or terrestrial repeaters |
| JPS63226124A (en) * | 1986-10-29 | 1988-09-20 | Oki Electric Ind Co Ltd | Level control circuit for radio equipment |
| US5101501A (en) * | 1989-11-07 | 1992-03-31 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for providing a soft handoff in communications in a cdma cellular telephone system |
| US5265119A (en) * | 1989-11-07 | 1993-11-23 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power in a CDMA cellular mobile telephone system |
| US5056109A (en) * | 1989-11-07 | 1991-10-08 | Qualcomm, Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling transmission power in a cdma cellular mobile telephone system |
| US5267262A (en) * | 1989-11-07 | 1993-11-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Transmitter power control system |
| FI86352C (en) * | 1989-11-14 | 1992-08-10 | Nokia Oy Ab | DIGITALISKT RADIOLAENKSYSTEM OCH FOERFARANDE FOER REGLERING AV EN SAENDINGSEFFEKT I ETT DIGITALISKT RADIOLAENKSYSTEM. |
| US5103459B1 (en) * | 1990-06-25 | 1999-07-06 | Qualcomm Inc | System and method for generating signal waveforms in a cdma cellular telephone system |
| SE467386B (en) * | 1990-10-05 | 1992-07-06 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | PROCEDURE CONTROLS OUTPUTS IN MOBILE RADIO SYSTEM |
| US5093840A (en) * | 1990-11-16 | 1992-03-03 | Scs Mobilecom, Inc. | Adaptive power control for a spread spectrum transmitter |
| US5204876A (en) * | 1991-03-13 | 1993-04-20 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing high data rate traffic channels in a spread spectrum communication system |
| JPH06506338A (en) * | 1991-04-01 | 1994-07-14 | モトローラ・インコーポレイテッド | Confirmation of target channel in wireless telephone system |
| US5107487A (en) * | 1991-05-28 | 1992-04-21 | Motorola, Inc. | Power control of a direct sequence CDMA radio |
| JP3132043B2 (en) * | 1991-06-13 | 2001-02-05 | 日本電気株式会社 | Clock extraction circuit |
| US5220678A (en) * | 1991-08-12 | 1993-06-15 | Motorola, Inc. | Method and apparatus for adjusting the power of a transmitter |
| US5245629A (en) * | 1991-10-28 | 1993-09-14 | Motorola, Inc. | Method for compensating for capacity overload in a spread spectrum communication system |
| US5267261A (en) * | 1992-03-05 | 1993-11-30 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Mobile station assisted soft handoff in a CDMA cellular communications system |
| US5305468A (en) * | 1992-03-18 | 1994-04-19 | Motorola, Inc. | Power control method for use in a communication system |
| KR100289630B1 (en) * | 1992-07-13 | 2001-05-02 | 리패치 | Wireless LAN output control method and device |
| US5465399A (en) * | 1992-08-19 | 1995-11-07 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and method for controlling transmitted power in a radio network |
| NZ255617A (en) * | 1992-09-04 | 1996-11-26 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Tdma digital radio: measuring path loss and setting transmission power accordingly |
| JP2802870B2 (en) * | 1993-03-10 | 1998-09-24 | エヌ・ティ・ティ移動通信網株式会社 | Code division multiplex mobile communication apparatus and cell selection method for code division multiplex mobile communication |
| US5752190A (en) * | 1993-07-30 | 1998-05-12 | Hughes Electronics | Supervisory audio tone based carrier-to-interference measurement in a mobile cellular communication system |
| US5422933A (en) * | 1993-09-09 | 1995-06-06 | Hughes Aircraft Compnay | Method and system for effecting handoff in a cellular communication system |
| JP3192839B2 (en) * | 1993-09-20 | 2001-07-30 | 富士通株式会社 | How to determine initial transmit power |
| US6157668A (en) * | 1993-10-28 | 2000-12-05 | Qualcomm Inc. | Method and apparatus for reducing the average transmit power of a base station |
| US5383219A (en) * | 1993-11-22 | 1995-01-17 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Fast forward link power control in a code division multiple access system |
| US5697053A (en) * | 1994-07-28 | 1997-12-09 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Method of power control and cell site selection |
| US5539744A (en) * | 1994-10-17 | 1996-07-23 | At&T Corp. | Hand-off management for cellular telephony |
| US5577022A (en) * | 1994-11-22 | 1996-11-19 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Pilot signal searching technique for a cellular communications system |
| US5701585A (en) * | 1994-12-12 | 1997-12-23 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson | Mobile assisted handoff |
| US5774809A (en) * | 1996-02-12 | 1998-06-30 | Nokia Mobile Phones Limited | Simplified mobile assisted handoff of signal between cells |
| US5889768A (en) * | 1996-08-30 | 1999-03-30 | Motorola, Inc. | Method of and apparatus for pilot channel acquisition |
| US5987012A (en) * | 1996-12-19 | 1999-11-16 | Motorola, Inc. | Method of handing off and a wireless communication device |
-
1997
- 1997-01-29 US US08/790,497 patent/US6151502A/en not_active Ceased
-
1998
- 1998-01-26 MY MYPI98000362A patent/MY118178A/en unknown
- 1998-01-27 KR KR1019997006846A patent/KR100561658B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-01-27 AU AU60323/98A patent/AU6032398A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1998-01-27 KR KR10-2005-7015553A patent/KR100524271B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-01-27 ID IDW990947D patent/ID24950A/en unknown
- 1998-01-27 BR BRPI9807027A patent/BRPI9807027B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-01-27 DK DK98903590T patent/DK0956732T3/en active
- 1998-01-27 RU RU99118907/09A patent/RU2217871C2/en active
- 1998-01-27 IL IL13109198A patent/IL131091A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-01-27 CA CA2279314A patent/CA2279314C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-01-27 PT PT98903590T patent/PT956732E/en unknown
- 1998-01-27 ES ES98903590T patent/ES2245018T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-01-27 JP JP53208598A patent/JP4027989B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-01-27 EP EP98903590A patent/EP0956732B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-01-27 WO PCT/US1998/001058 patent/WO1998033288A2/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-01-27 CN CNB988035596A patent/CN1168345C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-01-27 DE DE69831058T patent/DE69831058T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-01-27 AT AT98903590T patent/ATE301376T1/en active
- 1998-01-28 ZA ZA98700A patent/ZA98700B/en unknown
- 1998-01-29 AR ARP980100405A patent/AR011591A1/en active IP Right Grant
- 1998-04-24 TW TW087101126A patent/TW546971B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
1999
- 1999-07-26 FI FI991648A patent/FI19991648A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-07-27 NO NO19993649A patent/NO324444B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2279314C (en) | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system | |
| CA2295550C (en) | A method of and apparatus for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station | |
| US6999766B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for optimization of a cellular network | |
| EP1740007B1 (en) | Method and system for determining handoff in a mobile communication system | |
| KR100495687B1 (en) | Method of and apparatus for merging pilot neigibor lists in a mobile telephone system | |
| US6728538B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for generating pilot strength measurement messages | |
| US6594243B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for enhanced soft handoff in a CDMA wireless communication system | |
| US20060187869A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for initiating a reverse link intergenerational handoff in a CDMA communication system | |
| US6782261B1 (en) | Wireless handoff management method and device | |
| US6917808B1 (en) | Inter-frequency handoff evaluation method | |
| USRE39177E1 (en) | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system | |
| CA2602361C (en) | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wirless communication system | |
| AU2002300061B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system | |
| MXPA00000672A (en) | A method of and apparatus for selecting base stations to communicate with a remote station | |
| MXPA99007003A (en) | Method and apparatus for performing soft hand-off in a wireless communication system | |
| KR100281092B1 (en) | How to reduce soft handoff | |
| CZ2000216A3 (en) | Process and apparatus for selection of base station for communication with user's station |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKEX | Expiry |
Effective date: 20180129 |