CA2257266A1 - Electrotherapy device using low frequency magnetic pulses - Google Patents

Abstract

An apparatus and method for treating a disorder selected from the group of physiological, neurological and behavioral disorders, the method comprising applying to a subject a specific low frequency pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) having a plurality of intermittent waveforms, for a time effective to produce a desired effect in a target tissue.

Description

CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 ~LECTROTHERAPY DEVICE USnNG LOW FREQUENCY MAGNE~C PULSES
Field of the Invention This invention relates to m~gnetic fields and in particular, to the use of specifically designed low frequency pulsed magnetic fields (Cnps) for modifying a ~ variety of clinical physiological and neurological behaviors and conditions in S vertebrates and invertebrates.

Back~round of the Invention Diverse studies have shown that the behavioral, cellular and physiological functions of animals can be affected by magnetic stimuli. Weak magnetic fields exert a variety of biological effects ranging from alterations in cellular ion flux tomodifications of animal orientation and learning, and therapeutic actions in h~lm~n~
A number of magnetic field e~posures have been shown to reduce e~ogenous opiate (e.g. morphine~ and endogenous opioid peptide (e.g. endorphin) mediated analgesia in various species, including humans (Kavaliers & Ossenkopp 1991; Prato et al., 1987;
Betancur et al., 1994; K~valiers et al., 1994; Del Seppia et al., 1995; and Papi et al., 1995). As well, extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic field exposures are reported to modify homing pigeon behavior (Papi et al., 1992) and spatial learning in rodents (Kavaliers et al., 1993, 1996) in a manner consistent with alterations in opioidfunction.
There are several theories addressing the mechanism of the effect of low frequency magnetic field exposure on tissues. For example, low frequency magnetic field exposures have been proposed to exert their effect~s) through the induction of electric ~;Ullt;;lltS (Polk 1992; and Weaver & Astumian 1990). Weak magnetic fields have also been proposed to be detected by particles of magnetite in tissue and by virtue of this detection have a physiological effect (Kirschvink & WaL~er 1985);however, this magnetite based mech:~ni.~m is not widely believed (Prato et al., 1996).
Extremely low frequency (ELF~ magnetic fields are a physical agent which have little ~ttf~n~-~tion in tissue and therefore, can be used to alter endogenous processes provided they can be detected and their detection can be coupled to a physiological process. ~t is now shown that magnetic fields may be designed as time .
51u~ JTE SHEET (RULE 21;) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 varying signals such that they can be used to alter specific targeted physiological processes and in this m~nner can be used to treaVmodify various neurological andphysiological conditions and behaviors. It was therefore an object of the present invention to provide novel specific low frequency pulsed m~gnetic fields having a plurality of interrnitt~.nl waveforms for use to treat a variety of physiological, neurological and behavioral disorders in both vertebrates and in invertebrates.

Summarv of the Invention The applicants have now designed and characterized complex low frequency pulsed magnetic fields (Cnps) and their effects on physiologicah neurological and behavioral conditions. The low frequency pulsed magnetic fields are specificallydesigned to target and alter complcx neuroelectromagnetic applications and permit the development of therapeutic strategies in order to treat and/or altcr various physiological, neurological and behavioral disorders.
Broadly stated, the present invention relates to complex low frequency pulsed magnetic fields (Cnps) which are designed and used as a therapeutic treatment for disorders and behaviors including: alleviation of pain and anxiety; restoration of balance; improved learning; treatment of epilepsy; and depression; and for moderating eating habits.
In accordance with an aspect of the present invention there is provided a therapeutic method for treating physiological, neurological and behavioral disorders, the keatment comprising: subjecting a nn~tnm~l to a specific low frequency pulsed magnetic field having a plurality of waveforms designed with a length and fkequency relative to the target tissue intermittent with a built-in variable latency period and a fixed refractory period, for a time effective to produce a desired physiological effect.
The method of the present invention if not completely, at least partially, averts the development of tolerance which is typical with repeated ~innini~kations of analgesic drugs and in particular, opioids. The method also decreases the need to use pharmacological agents to treat and alleviate various physiological, neurological and behavioral conditions. In addition, the low frequency pulsed magnetic fields can be SlJ~ ~ JTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 designed with specific waveforms to target specific tissues to affect different physiological functions without presentation of unwanted side effects.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed descrip~ion and the specific examples while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.

Brief Description of the Drawin~s The invention will now be described in relation to the drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows a specific low frequency pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) used to induce analgesia.
Figure 2 shows detail of two of the waveforms of Figure 1. Comparison of the x-axis between Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows the portion of the time axis which has been expanded. Sub-label 1 corresponds to the waveform and sub-label 2 to the latency period.
Figure 3 shows a Cnp designed to target the vestibular system of rodents. The top panel corresponds to Cnp in time and the lower panel corresponds to the magnitude of the Fourier Transform of the Cnp.
Figure 4 shows in detail three waveforms of the vestibular Cnp shown in Figure 3. As in Figure 2, the x-axis in~lic~t~s that portion of the time axis which has been expanded and relates Figure 3 to Figure 4. Sublabel 1 corresponds to the waveform and sub-label 2 to the latency period.
Figure 5 shows detail of the Cnp used to target the human vestibular system.
There are differences in the refractory period as compared to the Cnp targeted for rodents (See Figure 3). The top panel corresponds to Cnp in time and the lower panel to the magnitude of the Fourier Transform of the Cnp.
Figure 6 shows the effect of a Cnp targeted to induce analgesia in a land snail.The y-axis corresponds to a measure of analgesia. Basal corresponds to measurements SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RUI E 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 done prior to exposure. The induction of analgesia is only thirty percent when asimple magnetic field waveform is applied (30 Hz sinusoidal 15 minute continuousexposure with a peak amplitude of 190 ~T and a static field of 76 ,u T parallel to the 30 Hz field). However when a specific designed m~netic field pulse (Cnp Exp) is given the analgesia is increased by more than 100 percent from the Basal value.
Figure 7 shows a Cnp pulse designed to target central nervous system targets which should increase analgesia in land snails. The upper panel corresponds to Cnp in time and the lower panel to the magnitude of the Fourier Transform of the Cnp.
Figure 8 shows that opioid antagonists reduce, but do not block, Cnp induced 1 0 analgesia.
Figure 9 shows thc effect of a complex neuroelectromagnetic pulse (Cnp), designed to increase analgesia, consisting of a series of time-varying extremely low frequency components (<300Hz) (A) repeated between refractory periods of severalseconds (B). The Cnps are repeated for the length of the exposure period (15 or 30 mins) (C). Peak Cnp exposure is set at lOOlaT vertical, with the horizontal and vertical static magnetic field set to counter the Earth m~pnetic field. Sham exposures consisted of a three-dimensionally (3-D) zeroed Earth magnetic field (3 orthogonal nested Helrnholtz coils tuned to oppose the ~arth magnetic field to ~vithin +O.l,uT, horizontal component = 14.71aT, vertical component = 43.3~T.) Figure 10 shows the effects of an acute 15 or 30 min exposure to either a specific pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) or sha~n exposure condition on the thermal (40 ~ C) response latencies of individual hydrated snails (N=120). Response latencies were recorded prior to (Pre) and after exposure. Sham 15 and 30 min exposures were not significantly different and were combined. Error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM), and where not visible are embedded within the syrnbol.
Figure 11 shows the effects of either (A) 15 min or (B) 30 min daily repeated exposures to either a specific pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) or sham exposure condition on the thermal (40 ' C) response latencies of individual hydrated snails (N=60).Response latencies were recorded prior to (Pre) and after (0, 15, 30, 60 min) exposure.
Response latencies from days 1, 3, 6 and 9 are shown. There were no significant SIJ~ 111 UTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 W 097/46277 PCT/CA97/0~388 _5 _ differences within the sham groups, hence the groups were collapsed. Error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM), and where not visible are embedded within the symbol.
Figure 12 shows the effects of either (A) 15 min or (B) 30 min daily repeated S exposures to either a specific pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) or (C) sham exposure condition on the the~nal (40 ~ C) response latencies of individual hydrated snails (N=60), shown in 3-D perspective. Response latencies were recorded prior to (Pre) and after (0, 15, 30, 60 min) exposure. There were no significant differences within the sham exposure or pre-exposure latencies.
Figure 13 shows the effects of (A) 15 and (B) 30 min daily repeated acute exposure to a sham or specific pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) on the thermal (40' C) response latencies ( 15 nlin post-exposure) of individual hydrated snails (N=60). Day 10 records the effects of condition reversal; in that, the previously sham exposed groups were exposed to the Cnp, and vice versa. Error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM), and where not visible are embedded within the symbol.
Figure 14 shows thennal (40 ~ C) response latencies of snails (N=60~ exposed to a specific pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) or sham condition for 15 or 30 min daily for 9 consecutive days. Response latencies were tested on days 1 and g prior to (Pre) and after (0, 15, 30. 60 min) exposures. There were no significant differences within the sham groups, hence the groups were collapsed. Error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM), and where not visible are embedded within the symbol.
Figure 15 shows thermal (40 ' C) response latencies o~ individual snails (N=30) exposed for 15 min to either a specif1c pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) or sham magnetic field for 9 consecutive days (normal). On day 10 the snails were exposed to the Cnp or sham condition while under a novel enviromnent condition (novel).
Response latencies werc tested prior to (Pre) and after (0, 15, 30, 60 min) exposure.
Error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM), and where not visible are embedded within the symbol. (*P<.01, **P<.001) 1:;igure 16 shows thermal (40 u C) response latencies of individual snails (N=60), that had been exposed for 15 min daily for 9 consecutive days to either a SlJts~ 111 ~JTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 sham or Cnp. Response latencies were tested on day 10 prior to (Pre) and after being injected either with the ~ opiate agonist, DPDPE, (0.05~g/l.O,ul saline) or saline vehicle (1.01l1) at 15, 30, 60 min intervals. Error bars represent the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM), and where not visible are embedded within the symbol.
Figure 17 shows Cnp induced activity in Deer mice. The Cnp shown in Figure 3 was used.
Figure 18 shows Cnp generated interference of human st~n~ling balance. The Cnp shown in Figure 5 was used.
Figure 19 shows the number of rearing behaviors in deer mice in each 5 min segment of the 10 min exposure. A rearing behavior is counted when the animal rears up on the hind limbs without touching any of the outsidc w alls o~ the exposure container. The Cnp (see Figure 3) exposure produced significantly greater counts than either the sham or 60 Hz exposure. The first (0-5) and second (6-10) minute Cnp segments are not significantly different. There are no significant differences within or between the sham and 60 Hz exposures. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean in Cnps previously.
Figure 20 shows the overall effect of Cnp (see Figure 3) on the rearing behavior in deer mice.
Figure 21 shows the number of centerline crossings in each 5 min segment of the 10 min exposure. A centerline crossing is counted when the entire animal traverses across the center of the exposure container. The Cnp exposure producedsignificantly greater counts than either the sham or 6û Hz exposure. The first (0-5 and second (6-10) minute Cnp segments are significantly different. There are no significant differences within or between the sham and 60 Hz exposures. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.
Figure 22 shows the overall effect of the Cnp of Figure 3 on the centerline crossing activity of deer mice.
Figure 23 shows the number of climbing movements in each 5 min segment of the 10 min exposure. A climbing movement is counted when the animal attempts to climb or reach up the side of the exposure container with 2 or more limbs e~t~ncle~l off SiJC~ 11 t lJTE SHEET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 WO 97/46277 PCT/C~97/00388 the floor and ends when all four limbs are on the floor. The Cnp exposure of Figure 3 produced significantly greater counts than either the sham or 60 Hz exposure. The first (0-5) and second (6-10) minute Cnp segments are significantly different. There are no significant differences within or between the sham and 60 Hz exposures. Error 5 bars represent the standard error of the mean.
Figure 24 shows the overall effect of the Cnp of Figure 3 on the number of climbing movements in deer mice.
Figure 25 shows the overall effect of the Cnp of Figure 3 on the total duration of grooming behaviors in deer mice.
Figurc 26 shows the sucrose preference, expressed as the percent of sucrose drunk out of the total ~luid intake, in male and female reproductive deer mice.
Percents are referred to the day of pairing with Lithium Chloride or saline solution, the 3 days following pairing and the two re-test days ( 10 days after recovering from sucrose averslon).
Figure 27 shows the total fluid intake of male and female deer mice before and after treatment with Lithium Chloride or Saline Solution.
Figure 2~ shows the total fluid intake of male and female deer mice after pairing of the apple juice with a Cnp or a sham magnetic field.
Figure 29 shows the target taste (apple juice or sucrose) preference, expressed 2û as the percent of target fluid drunk out of the total fluid intake, by male and female deer mice after exposure to the Cnp or a sham magnetic field.

Detailed Descripffon of the Preferred Embodiments As hcreinbefore mentioned, the present invention provides designed and 25 characterized low frequency pulsed m~gne~ic fields (Cnps) which have specific effects on physiological, neurological and behavioral conditions in vertebrates and invertebrates. The specific low frequency magnetic fields are designed for complex neuroelectromagnetic applications and permit the development of therapeutic strategies in order to treat and/or alter various physiological, neurological and 30 behavioral disorders particularly in m~mm~l~ and more specifically in humans.

5~ SS 1~ TE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 Magnetic fields have been demonstrated to have various biological effects in hl~m~n~, rodents and snails. Such magnetic fields can be ~letect~d and this detection can be broadly linked to certain physiological processes. It is now demonstrated that low frequency pulsed magnetic fields can be designed specifically to alter specific S targeted physiological processes and in this manner provide a therapeutic method for treatment and alleviation of certain conditions without the need for pharmacological intervention which is expensive and which poses several problems with respect to side effects of certain drugs.
In the present invention it is now demonstrated that the magnetic field 10 exposure must be designed as a time varying signal such that it can be used to alter a specific targeted physiological process. The designed low frequencv pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) is valid independent of the detection mech~ni~m. However, different detection mech~ni~m.c may affect how the Cnp is scaled and how it is delivered.
Under certain conditions cxtremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields can be 15 detected directly according to a resonance model. If the tissue exposed with the Cnp pulse detects magnetic fields by the resonance model, then the amplitude of thc Cnp pulse and possible DC (direct current) offsets are important and must be specified with limits below which and above which effects will lessen. On the other hand, if magnetic field detection is indirect, ie. the ELF magnetic fields are detected by tissue-Z0 induced electromotive force (i.e. Faraday's Law of Induction) then the effects willhave a lower threshold below which no effect will be seen and then above this threshold effects will increase. However, even for indirect detection, a m~cimllm threshold will exist above which the intlllce(l currents (caused by the induced EMF) will be so great that targeted effects will be swamped by large unwanted side effects.
25 Therefore, different detection mech~ni~m~ might affect arnplitude and DC offset of the Cnp, but the general design rules will not change. Individual features of a generalized Cnp are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2 and are labeled in letters running from a. How these features are specified and targeted to a certain physiological/behavioral effect is described below.

SlJ~ IITE SHEET (RULE 26 CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 g_ Desi~n of Waveform The low frequency pulsed magnetic fields are comprised of a plurality of interrnittent waveforms. The waveform is designed to look like the correspondingeleckomagnetic wavefonn of the target tissue. For example, if the target tissue were a 5 part, or parts, of the brain thcn the waveform would correspond to the energetic activity of those parts. If an electroencephalogram (EEG) could record that activity then the waveform wou~d mimic the EEG. As seen in Figures 1, 2, 3 and 4 the waveform is not sinusoidal as this waveform was designed to affect critical functions that do not rely on sinusoidal waveforms. Feature la is a rise to a maximum and 10 feature lb is designed to stimulate the firing of axons in the tissue type of interest.
Feature lc is a built in delay to reduce thc probability of neuronal excitation as the waveform ends.

LatencY Period After each waveform or between successive waveforms there is a delay, a latency period. This delay is progressively set to increase, or decrease~ in length with time. This effectively modulates, in time, the frequency of appearance of the waveform. The specific lengths and progression of the Cnp waveforrns are related to the target tissue. With respect to the central nervous system (CNS) for example, there 20 are a number of characteristic frequencies which relate to: a) frequencies specific to the area of the brain; b) frequencies associated with communication/connection between different brain regions; and c~ frequencies and phase offsets associatcd with the co-ordination of different brain regions for a specific function. Now, although the waveform has been designed to stimulate neuronal activity for a specific region,25 electrical activitv of a region of the CNS will vary between individuals, and over time, within an individual. Therefore, to target a function the frequency of presentation of the waveform should match the frequency of the target. However, the target is varying within a frequency bandwidth. These CNS frequencies vary between approximately 7Hz to 300Hz. (For example: 7Hz corresponds to alpha rhythm; lOHz 30 thalamic activit~; 15Hz autonomic time; 30Hz intr~l~min~r thalamus and temporal .
Sl~ JTE SHFET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 regions associated with memory and consciousness; 40Hz connection between hippocampal and amygdal temporal regions; 45Hz hippocampal endogenous frequency; 80Hz hippocampal-thalamic communication; 300~Iz motor control.) These frequencies have upper limits due to neuronal electrical properties, that is: after 5 a neuron "fires" it is left in a hyperpolarized state and cannot fire again until it recovers. Therefore, Feature 2 ~see Figure 2) the latency period: a) allows neurons to recover so that when the waveform is reapplied the neuron can respond; and b) its length is set so that the frequency of presentation of the waveform matches or approximates the frequencies associated with the target.
Modulation of LatencY Period To change the electrical activity of thc target tissue in the CNS, the Cnp must "latch on" or more app~ iately, entrain, to the appropriate frequency and either slow it down or speed it up. The waveform itself does not change substantially, rather, the 15 frequency discussed herein corresponds to the rate at which the waveform is presented and the rate at which electrical spikes occur in the target tissue. ~enerally, for the CNS, as the frequency of neuronal activity is increased the amount of tissue involved per burst of activity decreases. Conversely, as the frequency is decreased a greater amount of tissue is synchronized and rccruited throughout the CNS. For example, a) 20 greater speed of cognitive processing can be associated with increased rates; b) if the rate is decreased significantiy in humans or animals with epileptic-type disorders so much tissue can be recruited that seizures will occur. Tl erefore, the ramping up or ramping down of the rate of presentation of the waveform will: a) ensure that at least at some time the applied and endogenous rates will be matched (provided of course 25 that the initial rate is greater than the endogenous if the purpose is to reduce the endogenous rate or lower if the purpose is to increase the endogenous rate); and b) "pull down" or "push up" the endogenous rate.

SU~ JTE SI~EET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 Refractorv Period.
As a result of the application of the Cnp the synchrony of the electrical activity of the target can be disrupted. Before the application of another Cnp can be effectual the tissue must recover its synchrony. It is allowed to do so by providing a 5 refractory period between application of successive Cnps where the length of the refractory period is determined by the target. For example, if the Cnps are applied to a target in humans which is associated with ~'awareness", then the target will recover only after the awareness anticipation time is exceeded (e.g. 1200 ms). Another example would be the application for the same target, but in rodents without 10 significant awareness, in which case the refractory period could be reduced to 400 ms.
If the Cnps are to be applied for long periods of time per day, e.g. hours, then the refractory periods should be increased to 10 seconds to avoid possible immunosuppression. Immunosuppression has been show to occur when the CNS is stim~ te-l chronically and this may be minimi7ed if the refractory periods of this 15 stimulation are increased to more than 7 seconds.

Variabilitv in Features It must be pointed out that the Cnp features are related to the underlying physiology and that endogenous frequencies vary between individuals and within an 20 individual. Therefore, there is tolerance on the feature specifications for any Cnp designed for a specific target. For example, in the ana}gesia pulse shown in Figures 1 and 2, the features can be varied somewhat and the outcome will remain similar due to biological variations in the target. As well, as more and more is learned about biological interactions, the Cnp can be modified to take advantage of the new 25 knowledge to make the Cnp even more specific.

Amplitude and Direction of Application The amplitude of the Cnp to DC offset, and its direction of application (e.g.
linearly polarized vs. circularly polarized vs. isotropically polarized), is dependent on 30 the magnetic field detection mechanism which, may very well differ from one target S~Jt5~ 111 ~JTE SHEET (P~ULE 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 to another. We have experimentally demonstrated that the amplitude of the Cnp can vary significantly and that the Cnp is still effective provided the features remain constant for a specific application (Thomas et al, 1997).
Specifically, if magnetic fields are directly detected there will be a window of5 amplitudes and the possible need of a DC offset to the Cnp for it to be effective.
Further, the relative direction of the DC offset and the time-varying portion of the Cnp is irnportant. If the detection me(~h~ni~m is indirect, that is, induced currents, then an induced current feature, such as feature ld in Figure 1 may be added to the ~h~ve~o~
of the Cnp. This preferably would be a feature with a high value of dB/dt with 10 frequency components beyond those ~letect:-hle by the target (i.e. for the CNS, greater than approximately 500Hz) but designed to increase the induced EMF in the target.
For magnetic fields detected indirectly, a DC offset is ineffective but direction of the applied Cnp may be important as a time ch~nging magnetic field will induce the greatest EMF in conductive tissue which projects a maximum area normal to the 15 direction of the Cnp. We have experimentally verified in a limited experimental trial that for some applications the effect is independent of the DC offset.
The present invention is not at the magnetic field detection level, but rather in the coupling of a specific low frequency pulsed magnetic field to the target tissue.
The Cnp design philosophy is not altered if the detection mechanism is different for 20 different targets. ~ather, the Cnp is used in two "fiavours", one for direct detection and the other for indirect detection. Theoretically, it may be possible to produce the Cnp waveform using other physical entities besides magnetic fields, such as fl~hing light, electrical fields, acoustic waves and peripheral stim~ tion of nerve receptors.
However, extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic fields remain the method of 25 choice since they penetrate tissue with minim~l attenuation and since their amplitude can be spatially defined largely independent of the target. Hence, they are not limited to specific targets. For example, sound is largely limited to auditory nerves, light to optic nerves and electric fields to conductive entry points such as the roof of the mouth. Also, the bandwidth of reception may be too low such as that defined by the S~J~ 1 l l ~)TE SHEET ~RULE 26~

CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 "flicker fu.,ion rate" of the visual system. Nevertheless, Cnps may be used in the future with other stimulation methods to increase target specificity.

Deliverv-Exposure Systems.
Exposure systems which produce variable magnetic field amplitude over the subject's anatomy would be preferred in situations where the endogenous frequencies and waveform of the target overlap with other tissue which could produce unwanted "side-effects". Magnetic resonance im~ging (MRI) gradient tube and gradient coiltechnology can be easily adapted to produce such spatial variant Cnp exposures which can vary in both magnetic field amplitude and direction. Therefore, it is better to have two sets of volume coils for each of the three dimensions. One set would produce the PC offset eg. Helmholtz configuration (Prato et al, 1996) which would be needed if the detection mechanism is a resonance kind. The second would be used to define magnetic field gradients eg. Maxwell conf1guraiton (Carson and Prato, 1996) lS This type of exposure system would be ideal for acute and chronic exposures in which the subject can s~ay in one position, e.g. treatment of pain while the subject is in bed. For mobile subjects, such volume coil configurations would not be possible and delivery would preferably be through the use of surface coils either singly, as say on the surface of the body, or around the neck or as a E~elmholtz pair placed on either side of the knee. In this configuration the magnetic field arnplitude decreases rapidly from the surface coil and matching of target and magnetic field without exposingother tissue to an effective Cnp becomes more challenging.

Applications of Cnps Anal~esia The applicants have reported that complicated pulsed magnetic fields (Cnps) have a pain inhibitory (analgesic) effect. In one embodiment of the present invention, the designed Cnps can both increase the analgesic effect of an injection of an opiate, eg. Morphine, or actually induce a level of analgesia similar to a moderate dose of SUts~ 111 IJTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 morphine. This has a tremendous benefit for the potential of drug-free pain treatment which is highly desirable.
Opioid receptors are responsible, among many other functions, for the mediation of pain. Increase in exogenous/endogenous opioids can induce analgesia.
5 The applicants have shown that single sinusoidal EL~ magnetic fields can attenuate opioid in(l~lced analgesia. The applicants have recently demonstrated that the detection mechanism responsible for this response to ELF magnetic fields is a resonance model, that is, direct detection (Prato et al, 1996).
Since increases in opioid induced analgesia, rather than decreases, would have 10 therapeutic value, and since induction of analgesia by E~LF magnetic fields would have even grcater value the applicants have developed a simplc pure sinusoidal waveform specification that would induce mild analgesia. As shown in Figure 6 the increase was modest (20-30%). However, when the applicants designed a Cnp to induce analgesia the effect was made much larger (Figure 6).
The analgesia Cnp used and its magnitude Fast Four~er Transfor~n are shown in Figure 7. This in fact is the Cnp shown as Figure 1 alld 2. This "analgesic pulse"
can be used to: a) increase opioid induced analgesia; and b~ significantly induce an~lge~i~ In addition, it is now known that analgesia is only partially opioid mediated and that another analgesic component is present. This additiona} component 20 corresponds to the modulation of another target tissue or system, as yet unidentified.
This is probably due to the more general nature of this Cnp, and that the entire animal was exposed to identical magnetic fields. The power in the frcquency was in three bands: 4-16Hz; 22-26Hz; and 28-52Hz. The whole body of the ~nimzll~ (land snail,Cepaea ne~noralis) were exposed and the purpose was to slow down activity in the25 brain structures which have a high concentration of opioid receptors and are responsible for the awareness of pain with frequencies in the range of 28-52Hz. Note, that when a random pulse was used, in which frequency analysis indicated con~ t power in all frequencies between 0-166Hz, the induction of analgesia was not seen, indicating the specificity of even this general Cnp. The slowing up and disruption of 30 function in such biological sites in the snail equivalent to the CNS should have Sl~ JTE SHEFT (RUI E 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 WO 97146277 PCT/C~97/00388 profound effects beyond the induction of analgesia. In fact when whole rats with a pre-existing condition of status epilepticus were exposed to this waveforrn, the result was increased seizure activity. As previously discussed, when frequencies of ~ waveform firings are reduced, more tissue is recruited. In this extreme case, sufficient 5 CNS tissue was recruited in the electrically labile rat exposed to this Cnp resulting in increased seizure activity.
This Cnp pulse can be made more specific by treating subjects, like hllm~n~, only over specific CNS structures or by incorporating more selectively designed waveforms.
The applicant's have previously demonstrated that a short acute exposure to a specific weak extremely low frequency pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) can induce significant partly opioid-mediated analgesia in the land snaii, C~paea ~lemoralis. In the first studies individual groups of snails, Cepaea ~emoralis, were pre-injected with either the general opioid antagonist naloxone or specific antagonists (~L naloxazine, ~-funaltrexamine, ~ naltrindole, ICI-174, 864 or K nor-binaltorphimine opioid peptide specific antagonists), their respective injection vehicles or received no injection and then were exposed for 15 minutes to a Cnp or a sham condition. The snails were then tested for response latency on a hotplate (40~C). There were no significant differences in pre-exposure response latencies, or in sham exposure response 20 latencies, and hence, the individual groups were combined as seen in Figure 8. All groups showed a significant degree of induced analgesia as inferred by an increase in response latency; however, the general 11 and o opioid antagonists significantlyreduced, but did not block, the Cnp in~ re~l analgesia.
The time course of Cnp induced analgesia in these snails was also initially 25 investigated. Individual groups of snails were exposed to Cnps for either 15 or 30 minlltes and then tested immediately, at 15, 30 and 60 minlltcs after the Cnp exposure for response latency on a hotplate (40~C). While there was no significant difference bet~veen the 15 and 30 minute exposures, as compared to the sham exposure, therewas a significant degree of induced analgesia up to and including 60 minute post30 exposure (Figure 10).

S~ 111 lJTE SHEET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 The effect of Cnp induced analgesia has now been examined for the development of tolerance to daily repeated acute exposures of 15 or 30 minute duration. Also examined was the effect of acute cross-tolerance to the d opioid receptor directed against the DPDP~ enkephalin. The results of this study show that S brief (15 or 30 min) exposure to a specific pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) has antinociceptive or "analgesic" effects in the land snail Cepaea nemor~lis. The m~sgnitude and duration of this Cnp induced analgesia was reduced, though not blocked, following repeated daily exposures, in a manner indicative of the partial development of tolerance. Both associative (learning related) and non-associative (pharmacological related) processes were suggested to be linlced with the t;~ c;ssion and reduction of the analgesic effect of this specific pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) following repeated exposures. Presentation of novel environment~l cues could ameliorate the expression of this tolerance and nearly re-instate the level of acute Cnp exposure in~lllcecl analgesia. These results are consistent with, and extend, prior findings of specific pulsed magnetic fields, including the Cnp, having behavioral actions in invertebrate and vertebrate systems. These results also substantiate and extend prior reports that the effects of ELF magnetic fields on analgesia and likely other behavioral and physiological responses can be modified with repeated briefdaily exposures.
Exposure for either 15 or 30 min to the Cnp resulted in a significant increase in the latency of response of (~epaea to an aversive thermal surface, indicative of the induction of analgesia. The magnitude of this analgesia was related to the length of exposure suggesting a possible duration or dose-related effect of the Cnp. In previous studies it was shown that the Cnp induced analgesia is not a generalized or stress-related effect of exposure to m~gnetic fields. Other similar designs of pulsed magnetic fields were shown to have no significant effects on either basal nociceptive sensitivity or opioid-induced analgesia [Thomas et al., 1997]. In addition, simple sinusoidal extremely low frequency m~gnetic fields (c 300 Hz) have been shown either to ~tt~nl-~te or weakly augment opioid-mediated analgesia depending on the specific m~sJnetic field exposure characteristics. In the present, as well as prior SlJI~ 3TE SI~EET (RULE 2~i) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 studies, repeated sham exposures (zeroed or normal Earth magnctic field) and repeated determinations of response latencies, had no significant effects on nociceptive sensitivity.
The significantly greater magnitude of analgesia induced by the 30 exposure to S the Cnp as compared to the 15 minute exposure is consistent with the fin(1ingc that the inhibitory effects of an acute magnetic field exposure on opiate analgesia are affected by both the duration of exposure and the intensity of the magnetic field. Results of more in depth investigations, however, have also shown that the magnitude of theinhibitory effects does not scale linearly with either the frequency or amplitude of the lO ELF magnetic field [Prato et al., 1995].
Substantial evidence cxists for the presence of multiple endogenous opioid inhibitory systems. Both naloxone-reversible 'opioid' and natoxonc-insensitive 'non-opioid' forms of analgesia have been indicated [Rothman 1996] and are apparentlyphylogenetically conserved and expressed in both rodents and Cepaea [Kavaliers et ~5 al., 1983]. In prior investigations with Cepaea, it was established that the Cnp induced analgesia was of a mixed opioid and non-opioid nature [Thomas et al., 1997;
Thomas et al., 1 997(in press)] . The analgesic effects of the Cnp were reduced, but not blocked, by the prototypic opiate antagonist, naloxone, and the d opioid receptor directed antagonists, ICI 174,842 or naltrindole-5'-isothiocvanate (5'-NTII) (Table 2 20 and Thomas et al., 1997 (in press)). However, the analgesic responses were unaffected by pretreatment with the kappa opioid directed receptor antagonist, nor-binaltorphimine. This lack of a complete blockade of the Cnp induced analgesia by the opioid antagonists indicates that "non-opioid" as well as opioid mediated me~h~ni~ms are associated with the effects of the Cnp. The neurochemical 25 mech~ni.~m~ me~ tin,P. this non-opioid analgesia remain to be determined.
Typically chronic repeated ~mini.~trations of opiates result in the development of tolerance, such that the analgesic effects initially prodllced bysubstance such as morphine show a progressive decline in intensity until they are indistinguishable from the responses of control ~nim~l~ Similar pattems and 30 characteristics of morphine tolerance have been established to occur in Cepaea and S~ ~111 UTE SHEET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 rodents [Kavaliers et al., 1983; Kavaliers et al., 1985]. Here, it ~vas determined that after 6-9 days of daily 15 or 30 min exposures to the Cnp, tolerance developed to the opioid mediated component of the in~ ced analgesia. The pattern of response and time course is similar to that for the development of tolerance to antinociceptive 5 effects of opioid peptides and opiate agonists in Ccpaea and rodents. The level of analgesia attained after 6-9 days of daily exposure to the Cnp was similar to that recorded in snails treated with either naloxone or specific ~ opioid receptor directed antagonists and followed by a single Cnp exposure. In addition, the snails that had received the daily exposures to the Cnp displayed a significantly reduced sensitivity to 10 the analgesic effects of the specific ~ opioid agonist, DPDPE. This is suggestive of at least a partial generalization of tolerance (i.e. cross-tolerance) to the opioid component of the Cnp. Det~nnin~tions of the nociceptive responses of snails that have become tolerant to DPDPE and are subsequently exposed to the Cnp are necessary to explore more fully the extent of this generalization and the expression of cross-tolerance 15 bet~,veen Cnp and ~ opioids.
In the present experiments there was little evidence of a reduction in the levelof the "non-opioid" mediated analgesia induced by repeated exposures to the (: np.
The analgesia induced by the 15 min and 30 min Cnp exposurcs was reduced to a similar level. This raises the intriguing possibility that increased duration of the Cnp 20 may selectively augment the opioid mediated analgesia while leaving a relatively constant basal non-opioid mediated component. It also suggests that various components of this specific Cnp may differentially affect the expression and neurochemical substrates of opioid and non-opioid analgesia.
There have been only limited considerations of the development of tolerance 25 to naloxone-insensitive non-opioid analgesia. These studies have revealed either relatively low or no development of tolerance to non-opioid analgesia. This is not, however, completely limited to non-opioid analgesia, as weak tolerance has also been reported to the antinociceptive effects of certain opioid activating factors in rodents.
There is also no apl!a~ t cross-tolerance bet~veen opioid and non-opioid ~n~ eci~
30 with it having been speculated that the presence of opioid analgesia may even S~ 111 UTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 preclude the development of tolerance to non-opioid analgesia ~Rothman l 996].
Similarly, it is possible that the presence of non opioid analgesia may affect the expression of opioid systems and limit the expression of complete cross-tolerance as ~ suggested here with DPDPE (Figure 16).
It should also be noted that tolerance is considered to be best demonstrated by a shift in the dose-response indicative of the need for a higher dose to produce a consistent drug effect. In the present study, tolerance is inferred from the decrease in analgesia produced by daily repeated l 5 or 30 min exposures to the ~np. The lack of supporting evidence for a definitive linear dose-dependent effect of Cnp, along with l 0 the similar reductions in analgcsic effects of the l 5 and 30 min Cnp exposures, precludes ~?x~min~tion of shifts in dose responses.
Opiate tolerance has been proposed to involve both associative and non-associative components. In prior investigations it was shown that after the t~nnin~tion of drug treatment, Cepaea that were rendered fùlly tolerant to morphine exhibited depenclence and withdrawal symptoms, including hyperalgesia. that are considered to be consistent with non-associative mech~nism~ [Tiffany et al., 1988].
Non-associative tolerance is considered to ~ res~llt an effect arising solely from drug exposure. Tolerance is considered to result in part simply from cellular adaptations produced by repeated drug stimulation of some physiological system such as a particular receptor or second messenger cascade.
Opioids have stimulatory as well as the more conventionally studied inhibitory effects on nellrotr:~n~mi~ion that are accepted as the mech~ni~m~ underlying anal~;esia. There is ~.c-1m~ ting evidence that these stimulatory effects may also be associated with the development of opioid tolerance. In this regard, daily acuteexposures of Cepaea to ELF 60 Hz magnetic fields were shown to result in hypoalgesic or analgesic effects consistent with the antagonism of the excitatory hyperalgesic effects of endogenous opioids.
There is also evidence that particular tr~n~mitter systems may function to counteract opioid effects and mediate some aspects of tolerance. In this view, tolerance may not only result from decreased opiate efficacy, but also enhanced "anti-SU~ UTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 opiate" influences. The putative anti-opioid peptide, orphanin FQ or nociceptin,which exerts its effects through a novel orphan, opioid-like receptor, and has been recently implicated in tolerance, has been shown to affect nociceptive responses in Cepaea through NMDA associated mech~ni~m.s Intriguingly, orphanin FQ has also 5 been recently suggested to be involved in opioid mediated electro-acupuncture- induced analgesia [Tian et al., 1997].
Tolerance has also been shown to involve associative learning. Anim~
including Cepaea, repeatedly receiving morphine in a consistent, distinctive environment are much more tolerant to the analgesic and thermic effects of morphine 10 than when tested in a different, novel, ~llvi~o~ lent. In the present study this "environment~l specificity" ~vas demonstrated for the opioid mediated analgesic effects of the Cnp. Snails that were exposed to the Cnp while in a novel environment displayed an apparent reversal of tolerance, their analgesic responses being similar to that of individuals receiving single acute Cnp exposures (Figure 15).
A variety of factors. including EL~ magnetic fields, have been shown to function as salient environmental specific cues and affect the subsequent ~ ssion of tolerance. This raises the possibility that the Cnp itself may at least partially serve as a cue for tolerance development. This may contribute in part to the apparent }ack of a complete "cross-tolerance" to the analgesic effect of the Cnp to the ~ opioid agonist 20 DPDPE.
Associative, environmental or situation specific tolerance has been explained through classical conditioning, ~Tiffany et al., 1981] although habituation involving both associative and non-associative components has also been proposed [Baker et al., lg85~. According to the conditioning model the distinctive context has become a 2~ conditioned stimulus that elicits associative tolerance.
In the present study it was found that similar patterns of tolerance developed whether the snails received nociceptive testing every day or only on tne first and last days. This suggests that associative factors related to det~rmining the thermal response latencies (i.e. hotplate testing) of the snails did not play a major role in the 30 development of tolerance. This also minimi7:es the likelihood that tolerance arises SlJtl3 111 ~ITE S~EET (RUI E 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 W097/46277 PCT/C~97/00388 from cues associated with the nociceptive assessment. This is consistent with the results of a number of investigations of opiate tolerance in rodents, as well asmorphine tolerance in Cepaea.
Recent studies have focused on the possible neurochemical merh~ni~m~
5 involved in associative tolerance. Investigations with laboratory rats have suggested that neurotensin and possibly other neuropeptides implicated in memory may have a role in the mediation of associative tolerance [Girsel et al., 199~]. This does not preclude a role for othe~ neuronal and second messenger systems that have been implicated in learning in both molluscs and rodents, and been shown to be sensitive to 10 various types of magnctic ficlds.
A number of possible mech~ni~m.c have been proposed for the biological effects of magnetic fields [Kavaliers et al., 1994; Prato et al., 19951. Among these, resonance models ha~e predicated both increases and decreases in opioid analgesia along with effects at specific frequencies. These actions have been suggested to have 15 effects on calcium and potassium ions and various messenger systems [Kavaliers et al., 1996; Kits et al., 1996; Prato et al., 1996; and Kavaliers et al, 1996], that are associated with the mediation of opioid actions and learning related processes. All of these could contribute to the Cnp induced expression of analgesia and decline in the opioid component with repeated exposures.
Vestibular Svstem The use of Cnp pulses appears to be valuable for affecting various vestibular components of m~mm~ With respect to hl-m~n~, Cnps can be very valuable for the alteration of s~ncling balance. Disruptions of the balance system such as motion25 sickness may possibly be treated with the use of Cnps without adverse side-effects such as nausea or sleepiness.
The Cnp shown in Figure 3 was used to target the vestibular system in rodents (activity study; amplitude 100 mT), in deer mice (conditioned taste aversion study;
amplitude 100 mT), and in rats (conditioned taste aversion study; amplitude 1-4mT).
30 The Cnp shown in Figure 5 was also piloted in hllm~nc (balance study; amplitude 10-SU~:i 111 ~JTE SHEET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 60mT). Note that Figure 3 and Figure 5 differ only in the length of the refractory period. In humans the refractory period (Feature 4 in Figure 1) was 3 times longer than for rodents. The reason is that awareness lasts 3 times as long for hllm~n~ who extrapolate each awareness period (approximately 400 ms) with cognitive fimction to 5 three such periods (approximately 1200 ms).
The rate or waveform presentation was modulated from higher frequencies to lower frequencies and two different waveforrns were used. Figure 5 shows the magnitude Fourier transforrn of the Cnp, i.e. it is a magnitude spectrum of the positive frequencies and the maximum frequency possible was set to 500Hz by the digital 10 representation of the Cnp at a separation of I ms. Note, that Figure 5 indicates that the power in the spectrum is at three major frequency ranges: 100-125; 125-240, 325-410. The high frequencies were needed since the vestibular system is a motor function and, therefore, has endogenous CNS frcquencies of the order of 300Hz.
Two different waveforms were used to represent the electromagnetic activity 15 of the vestibular system. This was necessary to provide a minimum resolution time (lms) at the highest frequencies. Initially, a two lobe waveforrn was used and then when the waveform rate was sufficiently reduced and the latency sufficiently long a five lobe waveforrn was used as it was believed to belter mimic the underlying electrical activity of the target tissue.
Modulation of Anxietv Severe anxiety has been shown to accompany depression. A Cnp has now been designed which sigrlific~ntly alters anxicty related responses in mice.
A Cnp designed to produce vestibular disturbance in deer mice produced a 25 marked increase in activity (activity index = total of escape behaviors such as climbing ~ t~, jumps, centerline crosses) during a 10 minute Cnp exposure as compared to a 10 minute sham exposure (Figure 17). The 100 IlT Cnp exposure and sham condition were given while the animals were contained in a Plexiglass open-field box. The Cnp exposure also produced a significant decrease in the duration of 30 grooming behaviors (Figure 25~.

SlJI~ JTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 W 097/46277 PCTtCA97/00388 Modulation of Behavioral Activities Deer mice were exposed to a specific Cnp designed to interact with the ~ vestibular system to characterize the effects of Cnp on behavioral activities.
5 Individual deer mice were exposed to the Cnp or control conditions (sham or 60 Hz) for a 10 minute period while being videotaped and various behaviors were monitored.
It was concluded from this study that specific pulsed magnetic fields (Cnps3 may be designed to affect selectively a variety of behaviors. Acute exposures (5 min) are sufficient to produce a significant behavioral effect (Figures 19-25). Cnps were seen 10 to affect rearing behaviors and general activity such as climbing and centerline crosses compared to the control groups. Thesc result demonstrate that Cnps can be used to alter a variety of behavioral activities.

Taste Aversion Field studies have indicated that deer mice, Peromyscus Maniculatus, developed long lasting avoidance of poisoned baits, whereas results of an early laboratory investigation of conditioned taste aversion (CTA) suggested the formation of taste aversions that extinguished rapidly. The applicants have examined in one set of expcriments the acquisition and extinction of a conditioned taste aversion (sucrose 20 paired with LiCI) in male and female deer mice. In another set of experiments, the applicants have examined the acquisition and extinction of conditioned taste aversion using sucrose alone in Wistar rats and in deer mice. The applicants also examined the effects of specific Cnps on taste aversion learning. Together, the results of these studies (Figures 26-29) demonstrate that Cnp can be used to modify taste aversion in 25 deer mice and in Wistar rats.
A Cnp designed to interfere with vestibular proc~in~ was tested for aversive effects in two independent trials of conditioned taste aversion, or taste aversion le~rnin~. In one experiment, Wistar rats (N=24) that were exposed to the specific Cnp for one hour after being provided with a novel food item (sucrose solution) consumed 30 significantly more sucrose solution when tested three days after exposure, as SUt~ 111 UTE SI~EET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 compared to sham exposed animals (F, 23=5-997 P=.023, Eta'--.22). In another experiment, deer mice ~Peromyscus maniculat~ls) ~=43) were exposed to either thespecific Cnp or a sham condition for one hour. After exposure, the deer mice were given access to water and apple juice simultaneously and the ratio of apple juice to 5 total volume consumed ~apple juice + water) was recorded. The deer mice exposed to the Cnp consumed significantly more apple juice than did the sham exposed mice (Fl 43=3.95, P=.05). Though the exposure systems used in the two experiments were vastly different, the same specific Cnp was used. In both cases neither intlnced an aversion to the novel food. Results of prior investigations had shown that the specific 10 Cnps were capable of inducing other specific behavioral affects in those species.
~xperiment one utilized a singlc coil (72 turns of 30WG) wrapped around an al~ in~lm (1.3m x l.lm) cage rack (100-700,uT Cnp exposure, normal Earth earth magnetic field sham (Michon et al, 1996~). The exposure system for experiment two consisted of three pairs of nested orthogonal Helmholtz coils (Prato et al, 1996) (100+0.1,uT, 3-D +0.1~T zeroed Earth field magnetic sham).
The results of the studies using sucrose and LiCl showed that reproductive male and female deer mice developed a rapid conditioned taste aversion to a sucrose solution that was paired with lithium. There was a complete extinction of the aversion after 4-5 days with no evidence of a residual aversion 10 days later which is a contrast 20 to the longer lasting aversions generally evident in laboratory rats. There were also sex differences in the conditioned taste aversion with male deer mice displaying a longer lasting aversion and slower extinction than females.
The Cnp exposure did not elicit a conditioned taste aversion, but rather it reduced the neophobic responses of males to a novel taste and sex difference in 25 baseline taste preferences. Further experiments conducted at Laurentian University also revealed that the specific Cnp similarly reduced neophobic responses and aversions to novel food items in laboratory rats.
Overall, these fin~ing~ indicate that the effect of the specific Cnp, in at least a taste aversion paradigm, is dependent on the "characteristics" of the magnetic field, 30 not the exposure system, amplitude, geographical location or species tested.

SlJts~ ~ ITE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 Learnin~
A11 behaviors, including lcarning, originate as a pattern of electrical activity in the brain. Using specific Cnps, specific behaviors can be altered inferring thatspecific areas of the brain can be selectively affected. Previous studies using (~nps have shown alterations in behaviors such as language, memory, suggestibility, mood and understanding. It is anticipated that combinations of specific Cnps will result in predictable alterations of memory and learning.

1 0 E~ilepsY
The use of Cnps has great potential to treat epilepsy safely, a serious problem associated with brain trauma.

Depression The potential to treat depression with Cnps is enormous, in both clinical and model terms (Baker-Price and Persinger, 1996). Also, related disorders such as 'seasonal affective disorder' may prove to be susceptible to Cnp treatment. It has been envisioned that the equipment required for this Cnp treatment would be portable, about the size of a 'Walkman', and have earphone sized head coils.
The designed pulsed magnetic fields (Cnps) of the present invention can be used effectivelv to treat a variety of physiological and psychological conditions in a safe and effective manner. Any living organism inciuding humans and ~nim~l.c can be subjected to the Cnps of the present invention. By safe and effective as used herein is meant providing sufficient potency in order to decrease, prevent, ameliorate or treat a a physiological or neurological disorder affecting a subject while avoiding serious side effects. A safe and effective arnount will vary depending on the age of thesubject, the physical condition of the subject being treated, the severity of the disorder, the duration of treatment and the nature of any concurrent therapy.
The subjection of a subject to effective Cnps exposures of the present invention is defined as an amount effective, at dosages and for periods of time SlJtla l l l ~JTE SHEET ~RULE 26) necessary to achieve the desired result. This may also vary according to factors such as the disease state, age, sex, and weight of the subject, and the ability of the Cnps to elicit a desired response in the subject. Dosage or treatment regima may be adjusted to provide the optimum therapeutic response. For example, several divided doses or 5 treatments may be ~lmini~t(~red daily or the dose may be proportionally reduced as indicated by the exigencies of the therapeutic situation.
The Cnps of the present invention may be subjected to a m~ l alone or in combination with ph~ el-tical agents or other treatment regimes.

I O EXAMPLES
E~amPle l - Materials and Methods A~lin2als Snails were collected from old field sites in London, Ontario which did not have any overhead or underground electric tr~n~mission lines (<0.01 ~uT rms ambient 15 magnet fluctuation). Snails were then individually numbered by applying a small identifying mark on the apex of the shell using non-toxic colored fingernail polish.
The individually numbered animals were held in a telTarium (ambient fluctuating magnetic fields <0.4~1T) under indirect natural~ and fluorescent, lighting at anapproximate 12h light/ 12hr dark cvcle (LD=12:1 , L=2~0~W/cm~~, at 20+2 ~ C, with 20 lettuce available ad lib.

Assessme~lt of Nociception As the activity of gastropods is affected by their state of hydration ~Smith 1987], all snails were allowed to fully hydrate under a saturated atmosphere at 25 20~2 ~ C before being tested. Individual fully-hydrated snails were placed on a warrned surface ("hotplate" 4~0.2 ~ C) and the latency of their "avoidance" of the therrnal stim~ c, was determined. The avoidance behavior was a characteristic elevation of the anterior portion of the fully ~xte~ded foot, the behavioral endpoint being the time the foot reached maximum elevation [Dyalconova et al., 1995]. After 30 displaying this aversive, or more ~ru~l;ately, "nociceptive" response [ Kavaliers et 5U~ ITE SHEET (RUI_E 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 al., 1983], individual snails were removed from the thermal surface. An increase in response latency may be interpreted as an antinociceptive or "analgesic" response [Thomas et al., 1997]. The hotplate, which does not produce any magnetic fields,~ consisted of an alll~llilllllll water jacket with a stainless steel top (33 x 33cm) with water pumped through it from a circulating water bath.

Experime7ltal Apparatus Groups of 15 snails were placed in translucent polypropylene containers (12 cm square, 5 cm high) in the center of three mutually orthogonal Helmholtz coils (1.2 m for the coil that generated a vertical field and 1.1 m and 1.0 m for the coils that generated horizontal fields). Details of the coils and amplifiers are provided in Prato et al.[Prato et al., 1996]. A computer driven 8-bit resolution digital to analog converter {S. Koren, Neuroscience Research Group, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario)was used to produce the pulsed waveforms. Magnetic fields were measured with a fluxgate magnetometer (model FGM-3DI) and a field monitor (model ELF-66D), both Walker Scientific, Worcester, MA.

Mag~letic Field Exposure Conditions The 15 and 30 min magnetic field exposures consisted of a specific low frequency pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) (Figure 9) set to lOO~T peak amplitude in the vertical direction.
Sham exposures consisted of a three-dimensionatly (3-D) zeroed Earth m:~gnt-.tic field (Helmholtz coils tuned to oppose the Earth's magnetic field to within iO.lllT horizontal component = 14.711T, vertical component = 43.3~T.) Results ofprior investigations ~Thomas et al., 1997; Thomas et al., 1997 (in press)] had established that there were no significant differences in the response latencies of 3-D
zeroed Earth magnetic field sham exposed snails and those that were exposed to an ambient Earth magnetic field sham condition.

SUts;~ JTF SHEFT(RULE 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 B~xample 2 - Materials and Methods for Taste Aversion ~tu~ies Animals Male and female sexually mature deer mice (20-25 g and apL~uxilllately5 months of age) were housed in mixed-sex sibling groups (3-5 animals per group) in S polyethylene cages provided with cotton nesting material and Beta chip bedding.
Food (Purina Rat Chow) and water were available ad libitum. The reproductive mice (males scrotal, females cyclic) were held under a reproductively sfim~ tory (Desjardins et al. 1986; Nelson et al. lg92), long day, 16 h light: 8 h dark cycle (light 0600-2200 hr) at 20 +/-2~ C. The laboratory bred deer mice (15-20 generations) were from a population of wild caught animals originally present in the interior of British ~olumbia (Canada) near Kamloops (50 ~ 45' N, 120' 30' W).
Additional characteristics of this wild and laboratory population are provided in Innes and Kavaliers ( 1987).

Experimental Procedures There were five phases in this first experiment: a habituation phase; a conditioning phase: a postconditioning recovery phase, an extinction phase and a re-test phase.
Habituation phase Males (n= 21) and females (n= 22) were individually housed for 10 days with food and tap water, in standard drinking bottles, available ad libitum. For 4 days the mice were water deprived overnight (dark period). Each morning they were given two ~lnnking tubes containing tap water and the total amount of water consumed over 90 min. was recorded. For the rern~3in~ r of the day tap water in standard drinking bottles was available ad lihitum. The drinking tubes consisted of l S ml gr~ tedpolypropylene conical tubes (Falcon 2092, Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, New Jersey, USA), with screwable caps that were fitted with stainless steel water spouts with ball bearing. With these flrinking tubes fluid intake could be accurately d~termined to 0.25 ml. Individual body weights were recorded at night immediately SlJts~ 111 ~1TE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 after the removal of the water bottles and in the day directly after the drinking tubes were removed.

Conditionin phase.
On Day 5 overnight water deprived mice were given the two drinking tubes each of which contained a 0.3 M sucrose solution. After 90 min. the total sucrose intake was recorded and mice were immediately injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 20 ml/Kg of either a 0.15 M LiCI solution or 0.9% isotonic saline solution. After injection the water bottles were returned and the mice were then left undisturbed until the evening when their bottles were removed and the mice were weighed. Ma}e and female mice were randomly assigned to the UCI and saline ~,roups.

Post conditionin~ recoverv phase.
For two days after conditioning (days 6 and 7) mice were kept on their nightly water deprivation schedule. In the mornings they were presented the two drinkingtubes with tap water for 90 min. after which water from the standard drinking bottles was provided ad libitul?l. Body weights were recorded twice daily as previously described.

Extinction phase.
On days 8-11 individual mice were presented-two drinking tubes, one cont~ining tap water and the other one holding the 0.3 M sucrose solution in themorning drinking period. Water and sucrose solution intakes were recorded for 90min. after which tap water from standard water bottles was available ad libitum. The position of the two drinking tubes was varied: half of the mice in each experimental group (LiC1 and NACI) had water on the right and the other half had sucrose on the right. To correct for possible individual p,~r;:l~;l,ces, the position of the water and sucrose tubes were reversed on subsequent days. Deer mice were weighed twice daily.

SU~ 111 UTE SffEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 Recoverin~; Phase After extinction of the conditioned taste aversion the male and female deer mice were left undisturbed for 10 days with ad libitlo~l access to food and tap water.

Retestin~ Phase Individual male and female mice were replaced on the overnight water deprivation schedule. For two days the water deprived mice were given in the morning two drinking tubes, one cont~ining water and the other 0.3 M sucrose andtheir total fluid intakes were determined over 90 min. After this 90 min. period they were provided with ad libitum access to the standard water bottles.
Total fLuid intakes were analyzed by a two way individual analysis (MANOVA) with sex (two levels; mails and females~ and treatment (two levels; LiCl and NaCl) as between-subject factors and intake as a repeated-measure within-subjects factor (eleven levels; Habituation (four days), conditioning (pairing and 2 post injection days), extinction (four days)). In order to evaluatc the effects of sex and treatment on the fLuid intakes on each day mean comparison were planned a priori in the MANOVA model. Since fluid intake displayed a Poissonian distribution the data were square-root transformed before analysis. As there were some zero intakes, 0.50 was added to all values before transformation.
Preference data from extinction and re-test phasees were expressed as the percent of sucrose (arcsin transformed) consumed in the total fluid. These preference data were analyzed by a two way MANOVA7 with sex (two levels; males and females) and treatment (two levels; LiCl and NaCl) as between subject factors and percent of sucrose as a repeated-measure within subjects factor (six levels: 4 extinction days + 2 re-test days). In order to evaluate the effects of sex and tre~tment on sucrose p~cr~ lce for each experimental day, mean comparisons were planned a priori in the MANOVA model.
Body weights were analyzed by a two way MANOVA witl1 sex (2 levels;
males and females) and treatment (2 levels; LiCl and NaCl) as between-sub~ect factors and intake as a repeated-measure within-subjects factor (21 levels). In order to SlJts~ ~ JTE SHEET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 evaluate the effects of sex and treatment on the mice body weights for each expe6mental day, mean comparisons were planned a priori in the MANOVA model.
All hypothesis tests used a=0.05 as the criterion for significance.
.

Ma~netic Field ~eneration In the magnetic and sham field exposure conditions mice were placed in a Plexiglas box in the centre of three mutually orthogonal Helmoltz coils (1 .2 m diameter for the coil that generated a vertical and 1.1 m for the coils that generated horizontal fields; details of the coils and amplifiers are provided in Prato et al. (1994).
A computer driver with a 8 bit resolution digital to analog converter produced the pulsed waveforms. Magnetic fields were measured with a ~luxgate magnetometer (model FGM - 3Dl) and a field monitor (model ELF - 66D; both Walker Scientific, Worchester, MA. USA).

Magnetic field exposure conditions The magnetic field exposures consisted of a specific low frequency pulsed magnetic field set to 100+/-O. 1 ~T; peak amplitude in the vertical direction.
Sham exposures consisted of a three dimensionally (3-D) zeroed earth field (Helmoltz coils tuned to oppose the earth's field to within +/-0.1 ,uT; horizontal component = 14.7~T, vertical component = 43.311T).

Example 3 - Experimental Procedures, Opioid Ex~eriments Experiment 1 Each day for 9 consecutive days, at midphotophase, separate groups (n= 15 per 25 group, N=l 20) of hydrated snails were exposed to either the specific pulsed magnetic field or sham magnetic field for either 15 or 30 min. On day 10, the exposure conditions were reversed for each group, with sham animals receiving the Cnp andCnp exposed animals receiving sham exposure. Response latencies of the snails were ~let~nnined prior to (Pre), immediately after (0) and 15, 30 and 60 min after exposure.
30 One individual carried out the Cnp and sham exposures while a second experimenter, SIJ~ 1 l l ~ITE SHEET (RULE 26) in a separate room, determined the response latencies. Results of previous investigations had established that tolerance to the analgesic effects of morphine in Cepaea was evident after 7 days of daily repeated acute trez-tment~ [Kavaliers et al., 1983].
s Experiment 2 Each day for 9 consecutive days, at midphotophase, other separate groups (n=
15 per group, N=60) of hydrated snails were exposed to either the specific Cnp or sham magnetic field for 15 or 30 min and then (except for days I and 9) imme~ tely 10 returned to their home container. On days I and 9 response latencies of the snails were individually determined prior to (Pre), immediately after (0) and lS, 30 and 60 min after exposure, after which they were returned to the home container.

Experiment 3 After 9 days of daily repeated acute Cnp or sham exposure (15 min) and ~se~ment of nociception (pre, 0, 15, 30, 60 min), other groups of snails (N=30) were exposed (day 10) to their respective exposure conditions while held in a novel enviromnent. The novel environment consisted of a modified version of the previous polypropylene exposure container. Pieces of coarse garnet sandpaper were fitted and glued to the top and bottom inside of the container and then rinsed with carrot juice ~whole blended carrot). Carrot is assunled to be a novel food item, as the laboratory housed snails were not exposed to this food item at any time. In addition, other naive snails (N=60) were exposed to either a Cnp or sham condition while housed in either the C, '~norrnal" or "novel" exposure environment. The novel environ~nental condition had no effect on the magnetic field exposure characteristics.

Experiment 4 After 9 days of daily repeated acute Cnp or sham exposure (30 min) and ~C~pt~mpnts of nociception (pre, 0, 15, 30, 60 min), individual snails (N=60) were injected (day 10 with either DPDPE (0,05 ,ug/1 .0,ul saline, Research Bioch~:mi StJ~ 111 UTE SHEET ~RU~E 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 Natick, MA) or 0.9% saline vehicle (1.0~11). Nociceptive sensitivity was determined prior to and 15, 30, 60 min after injection. This dose of DPDPE was established in a prior study to elicit an analgesic response comparable in magnitude to that observed after a single acute Cnp exposure [Thomas et al., 1997 (in press)]. All solutions were 5 injected with a 2.0,ul microsyringe (No. 75, Hamilton, NV) in either the vicinity of, or directly in, the mantle cavity into the haemocoel. Injections were made on the basis of 1.0g body mass. The body mass of snails, without shells, range from 0.7 to 1.3 g.

Experiment S
The Thermal response latencies of snails receiving Cnp and treatments with opiate antagonists.
Snails were injected with either the prototypic opiate antagonist, naloxone (1.0g/1.0 ~l saline), the specific ~ antagonist, naltrindole-5'-isothiocyanate (5'-NTII, 0.1 ~ugll .0 ~1 saline) or saline vehic~e ( 1.0 ~1) prior to being exposed for 15 min to the specific Cnp. Other groups of snails received either acute sham m~gnetic field, acute Cnp exposure (15 min~ or daily repeated (gdays) acute Cnp exposure. There were no significant differences in response latencies between opiate antagonist treated animals (naloxne, 5'~NTII) and those receiving Cnp exposures (acute daily exposure for 9consecutive days). Acute Cnp exposure produced significantly greater response latency than all other groups (Tukey's HSD, P~0.05).

Experiment 6 The effect of Cnp exposure on behavioral activities in deer mice.
Individual deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) ~N=46) were exposed for 10 min (analyzed in 5 min segrnents), while being videotaped, to either; a normal Earth magnetic field, 14.7 !lT horizontal and 43.3 ~LT vertical sham condition, a 3-D zeroed Earth magnetic field (+/- 0.1 ~T) sham condition, 60 Hz ( 100 +/- 0.1 ~uT vertical) sinusoidal magnetic field or a specific Cnp (100+/-0.1 ,uT peak) condition. The exposure chamber consisted of a 33 cm Plexiglass cube held within three pairs ofnested orthogonal Helmholtz coils (1.2m x l.lm x 1.0m) (Prato et al., 1996). The S~ 11 UTE SffEET (RULE 26~

W 097146277 PCTICA97tOO388 videotapes were then analyzed by an experimenter ~lind to the exposure conditions.
Various behavioral activities were recorded (center-line crossings, climbing attempts, rearing and duration of grooming episodes) indicating that the pulsed Cnp exposed deer mice had a significantly increased level of activity compared to the normal Earth rnagnetic ficld, 3-D Earth magnetic field sham and 60 Hz MF exposure conditions.There were no significant differences in activity bet~,veen the normal Earth magnetic field, 3-D zeroed Earth magnetic field sham or 60 Hx MF exposure conditions.

S~atistical A71alysis Data were analyzed with multivariate, repeated measures, one-way and two-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) using The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS 7.0). Post-hoc analyses were carried out using Tukey's HSD test. All hypotheses tests used a = .05 as the criterion for significance.

Example 4 - Experimental Results~ Onioid ~tudies .rperiment 1 Acute single exposure to the Cnp elicited a significant (F4 "5=268.59, Pc.001, Eta1=0.90) increase in response latency indicative of the induction of analgesia at 0, 15~ 30 and 60 min post exposure. The 30 min exposu~es induced a significantly greater amplitude of analgesia than did the 15 min exposure at 0, 15 and 30 min post exposure (~4 ~13=4.71, P<.Ol, Eta'=0. 14) (Figure 10). In both cases, maximum analgesia was elicited at 0-15 min post-exposure with significantly lower response latencies at 30 and 60 min post exposure. Repeated daily exposures to the Cnp resulted in a significant reduction in the levels of analgesia. By the third day, no significant differences in the increases in response latency were elicited by the 15 and 30 min exposures (Figures 11A, 11B and 12A, 12B).
The analgesic effects of daily repeated acute exposure to a Cnp magnetic field were highly significant (F, 55=2856.4, P<.001, EtaZ=0 .95) (Figure 12A), con~ist~ntly producing a significant increase in response latency. Repeated analysis of variance revealed a signific.~nt reduction in daily intl~lcetl analgesia (F8.48=86.29, P<.001, EtaZ

SlJt~ JTE SHEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 .94) (days 1 to 9); and a significant reduction in the duration of analgesic effect (F4s2=230.66, P<.001, Eta2=0.95) ~pre-exposure and 0, 15, 30, 60 min after daily Cnp exposure) (Figure 12A). Although the amplitude of Cnp induced analgesia was significantly reduced after the repeated daily exposure, a significant ~3n~lgeciz~ was present after each Cnp exposure (Tukey's HSD, P<.05) (Figures 12A, 12B~.
Maximum rcductions in analgesia were evident after day 6 of exposure to the Cnp,with no significant further reduction of response latency on subsequent days. There were no significant changes in either pre-exposure basal response latencies or the nociceptive responses of the sham exposed snails (Figures 12A, 12B, 12C). Reversal of the exposure conditions on day l O produced a significant shift in response latency (F4s~=l 10.8, P~.001, Eta'=0 .90). The Cnp exposure induced sionific:~nt analgesia in the previously sham exposed snails while the snails now exposed to the sham condition showed no significant increase in response latency ~Figure 13A, 13B).
Results of previous studies [Thomas et al., 1997 (in press) and Table 2 ~ had established that pre-treatment with either the prototypic opiate antagonist, naloxone, or the specific ~ receptor directed antagonist, 5'-NTII, significantly reduced, but did not block, the analgesic effect of the Cnp. The saline vehicle had no significant effect on response latency. These inhibitory effects of the opiate antagonists on the amplitude and time course of Cnp induced analgesia were comparable to the reduction in response latency and levels of analgesia that were obtained by repeated dailyexposure (6-9 days) to the Cnp (Table 2).

Experiment 2 Snails that were exposed to the Cnp daily for either 15 or 30 min, but tested for nociceptive responses only on days 1 and 9, showed a significant reduction in Cnp in~ cecl analgesia (F" ~o=3 144~4~ P<.001, Eta2 =0 93). The extent of this reduction was not significantly different from that seen in snails that received daily acute Cnp exposures and nociceptive asses~ment~ There were no significant differences in pre-exposure or sham exposure latencies.

SIJ~ 1 I ~ ~)TE SHEET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 Experiment 3 The presence of a novel environment on day 10 of the repeated daily exposures to the Cnp caused a significant increase in the level of Cnp induced analgesia (F, 27=250.6, P<. 00 1, Eta~-0.90)(Figure lS). The amplitude of the analgesic response evident in the novel environment was significantly greater than on day 9 of the daily repeated exposures to the Cnp (F, 27=6.98, P<.01, Eta'=0 .24). The elevated response latencies evident following exposure to the Cnp in the novel environment on day 10 were not significantly different from those of day 1 of the repeated exposures under normal environmental conditions. Other groups of naive snails receiving an acute exposure to the Cnp or sharn condition ( 15 min), while in either the norrnal or novel environrnent, showed elevated response latencies indicative of Cnp in~ ced analgesia (1~, ~8=248.76, P<.001, Eta2=0.90). There were no significant differences in the levels of analgesia induced in the two environmental conditions (F, 58=1.31, P>.50, Eta'=0 .04). There were no significant differences in pre-exposure or sham exposure latencies.

~:xperiment 4 Treatment with the specific ~i opiate agonist, DPDPE, produced a significant analgesic effect in snails that had received daily repeated sham magnetic field exposures for 9 days (Fl 59=86.97, P<.001, Eta2=O .87) (Figure 16). This analgesic effect was similar to that previously o~served in naive unexposed snails treated with DPDPE (0.05~1g 1.0111) [Thomas et al., 1997 (in press)]. Snails that received acute (15 min) exposures to the Cnp and were injected with DPDPE also displayed a ~ignific~nt ~n~1gt~ic response, with increased response latencies at 15 and 30 min post-injection. However, the magnitude of this analgesia was significantly lower than that displayed by the sham exposed DPDPE keated snails (Figure 16~. The level ofanalgesia inr~lce(l by DPDPE in the snails that had received 9 days of daily repeated exposures to the Cnp was similar to the analgesic effect elicited by the Cnp exposure on day 9 of the repeated exposures. The saline vehicle injection (1.0~1) had no 51J~;~ JTE SffEET (RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 significant effect on response latencies. There were no significant differences in pre-exposure or sham exposure latencies.

Example 5 - Experimental Results Taste Ave~sion Studies Total Fluid Intakes The total fluid intakes across the various experimental phases are shown in Figure 27. Overall thcre was a signifi~nt interaction of trcatment by sex by time (F(~o 390)=2,09; P=0.02). By the 4th day of the habituation phase all of the overnight water deprived males al1d females consumed similar amounts of tap water during the 90 min. presentation of the drinking tubes. Likewisc~ an the pairing day males and females assigned to both t~eatment groups drank the same amount of the novel sucrose solution. Tl1e amount of sucrose consumed was not different from that of the tap water on the last day of the ha~ituation phase. Similarly, the two sexes andtreatment groups of deer mice did not differ in the total watcr intakes in the post conditioning (recovery) days as well as on the first two days ofthe extinction phase.
On third day of the extinction phase females overall drank significantly mare than males (F(, 39)=8.42; P=0.OOG). This sex difference was highly significant for the NaC1 treated mice (F(, 18)=5.5~; p=0.02). though not for the LiCl t~eated mice (F(~ ,9)=3.32;
p=0.09). On the fourth day of the extinction phase there we~e no significant male-female or group differences in total fluid intakes.
On the re-test days the MANOVA showed that total fluid intakes of females were significantly greater than those of males on both days (main factor sex RE-TEST-1: F(, 39)=6.17; P=0.017 / main factor sex RE-TEST-2: F(139) =5.93; P=0.019).

Percent Sucrose Intake The percent of sucrose consumed by the deer mice during the extinction and the retest phases is shown in figure The overall analysis showed a signific~nt main effect of treatment (F(, 108)=1 0-45: P=0.003). a significant interaction of treatment x time (F(3 108)=3 .4g 1; P=0.02) with the interaction treatment x time x sex approaching significance (F(3 ,o8)=2.609; P=0.05). The MANOVA showed that on the first and SUBSTITUTESHEET~RULE26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 second days of the extinction phase LiC1 treated male and female mice ingested asignificantly lower percent of sucrose (first day: 13%; second day.- 28%) than vehicle treated males and females (first day: 58%; second day: 66%, with no signific~nt sex difference) mice (First extinction day: F(~36~- 1 9,00; P=0001 / Second extinction day:
F(l36)= 17,35; P=0.0002). On the third extinction dav only LiCl treated males still showed a significant reduction in the percent of sucrose solution ingested (males:
F("8,=4,12- P=0.049 / females: ~(l ,8,=1.96; ns). On this day the percent of sucrose intake of the LICL treated males was 46%. while that of vehicle treated males was 70% of sucrose. Conversely, the sucrose preference of females was equally high in both the LiCl (61 %) and vehicle ~76%) groups. ~3 v dav I also the males had recovered from the conditioned sucrose aversion and the percent of sucrose drunk was not significantly different between sexes and treatments (overall mean).
On the re-test phase, ten days after recovering from the taste aversion all of groups displayed a similar marked preference (80%) for the sucrose solution, indicating that the greater total fluid intake displayed bv females did not reflect a sex difference in taste preferences (Figure 28).

Body Wei~hts There were no significant sex differences or ef~ects of treatment on body ~ eights.

Total Intakes The total fluid intakes across the various experimental phases are shown in figure Overall there was a significant main effect of sex (F("95)=4.28; P=0.045) as ~vell a significant interaction of sex x intake in time (F(s l95~=2.43; P=0.036). The MANOVA showed that on the pairing day, when apple juice and the magnetic/sham field were presented, males and females did not differ in their total intakes of apple juice.
On the two days after the magnetic/sham field exposure (sucrose and water presented), there was a significant interaction sex x field condition (POST-1:

51J~:5~ 111 UTE SHEET ~RULE 26) CA 022=,7266 1998-12-02 F(, 39)=4.16; P=0.048 / POST-2: F(, 39)=4.53; P=0.043). Mean comparisons revealed that only sham exposed females displayed a greater intake than sham-exposed males (Figure 28). This effect was stronger on the first day post-magnetic/sham field exposure when sham-exposed females drank more than eithcr magnetic field-exposedS females and or males of both exposure groups (Sham Females ~ s Sham males:
F(, 19~=9.55; P=0.004 / Sham Females vs Pulse females: F(l ,o)=7.61; P=0.009 / Sham females vs Pulse males. F("9~=9 l9; P=0.004). On the second day following the magnetic/sham exposure females of the sham group still consumed a significantly greater amount of fluid than the sham-exposed males (F~"9)=4.21; P=0.047). On the 10 apple juice re-prcsentation day males and females, in both magnetic and sham exposed groups, did not differ in their total fluid intake.

Percent of Sucrose All of groups displayed a similar marked preference (80%) for the sucrose 15 solution, indicating that the greater total fluid intake displayed by females did not reflect a sex difference in taste preferences (Figure 26).

Percent of apple iuice The percent of apple juice consumed by male and female deer mice on the third 20 day aftcr exposure to the magnetic/sham field are shown in Figure 28. There was a significant main effect of treatment (F(, 39)=5.28 P=0.02). Mean comparisons revealed that the effect of the pulse on the deer mice reaction to the novel fluid item was different in male and female. Magnetic field-exposed female deer mice consumed the same percent of apple juice as sham exposed females (F(, 20)=O.32; ns). Conversely 25 sham exposed males consumed a ~i~nific~nlly lower percent of apple juice than either the magnetic field exposed males (F(l ,9~=7,765-, P=Q.008) or the magnetic field-exposed females (F("9)=4.87; P=0.03). However, they did not consume less than sham-exposed females (F (l ,g)=1.98: ns). Figure 28 shows that magnetic field exposed mice of both sexes consume a high percent of apple juice (males: 79%, females:
30 75%). In the sham exposed group only females showed a pl~re~ ce for the apple SIJ~ 111 I)TE SI~FE1 ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 1998-12-02 W 097/46277 ~CT/CA97/0038 juice (68%). while males consumed equal quantities of apple juice and tap water (51 % of apple Juice), suggesting that the magnetic field exposure increascd the initial low preference of males for the novel taste.
After being re-tested all mice, that at this stage all displayed a marked 5 preference for the sucrose solution, were then used to examine the effects of a specific pulsed m:~gnetic field an taste preferences. There were three phases in this second experiment. conditioning phase (pairing of the magnetic field with a novel taste; apple juice); post-conditioning phase (sucrose plt;;r~ ce) and post-m~gnetic/sham pairing apple juice pler~ ce-determination.
Body weights were not determined as the results of previous experiments had established that the experimental procedures had no significant effect an body weight.
Conditioning Phase: Novel Fluid (Apple Juice) and Magnetic/Sham Field ~xposure.
On the morning of the first day water deprived mice were given two drinking 15 tubes both cO~ l;llg pure unsweetened apple juice (McIntosh, Master's Choice,Canada). Apple juice was a novel fluid which in pilot studies deer mice had beenshown to readily consume. Apple juice intakes were measured over 90 min. The mice were then immediately placed in the novel holding cage (four mice per time, two males and two females) that was quickly (30 s) moved into the magnetic field 20 ~pparatus where they were exposed for 60 min. to either the pulsed magnetic or sham field. Each exposure cage was divided in four separate compartments by opaque Plexiglas partitions that prevented the individual mice from seeing each other. Thus four mice per time (2 males and 2 females) were exposed to the same field condition.
Mice were assigned to the magnetic/sham exposcd groups in a quasi-randomized 25 manner. From each of the LiCl/NaCl groups of experiment 1 half of the males and half of the females were exposed to the magnetic field, while the rem~inin~ ~nimzl.c underwent the sham exposure. The order of the exposures were quasi-randomized, with a sham field exposed group following each magnetic field e~posure group of 4 mice. The box was washed with hot water and unscented soap between exposures.

SUt~ JTE SHE~T ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 After being exposed to the magnetic/sham field the mice were returned to their home cages with ad libitum food and water. Water was removed overnight.

Post Conditionin~ Phase: Percent of Sucrose Intake.
On the two days following the magnetic/sham field exposure mice were placed an the overnight ~vater deprivation schedules. In thc momings they were presented with two drinking tubes, one cont~ining 0.3 M sucrose and thc other tap water. Their intakes were determined for 90 min. after which mice were provided with ad libitum access to tap water.
Post Pairin~ Percent of A~ple Juice Intake.
On third day after magnetic/sham field exposure overnight water deprived deer mice were presented with two drinking tubes, one containing water and the other apple juice and their ~luid intakes over 90 min. were deterrnined. After this 90 min.
period of time the mice were provided with ad libitu~7l access to tap water. Theposition of the tubes was quasi-randomized: half of the mice in each experimental group (Magnetic/sham field exposed; males/females) had water on the right and the other half had apple juice on the right.
Total fluid intakes across all the experimental days were analyzed by a two way MANOVA. with sex (two levels; males and females) and treatment (two levels;
Magnetic and Sham field) as between-subject factors and intake as a repeated-measure within subjects factor (four levels~. In order to evaluate the effects of sex and treatment on the fluid intake on each experimental day, mean comparisons were planned a priori in the MANOVA model. Since fluid intake displayed a Poissonian distribution the data were square-mot transformed before analysis. As there weresome zero intakes, 0.50.was added to all values before transformation.
The sucrose preference data were expressed as the percent of sucrose ingested (arcsin transformed) and were analyzed by a two way MANOVA, with sex (two levels; males and females) and treatment (two levels; Magnetic and Sham field) as between subject factors and pcrcent of sucrose ingested as a repeated-measure within SUts:~ 111 LJTE SffEET (RULE 26) WO 97/46277 PCT/C~97/00388 subjects factor (two levels, two days after magnetic/sham field exposure). In order to evolute the effects of sex and treatment on the sucrose preference on each experimental day, mean comparisons were p}armed a priori in the MANOVA model.
The apple juice preference data were expressed as percent of apple juice S consumed ~arcsin transforrned) and were analyzed by a t~,vo way ANOVA with sex(two levels; males and females) and tre:~tment (t~,vo levels; Magnetic and Sham Field) as betwecn subjects and percent of apple juice as the dependent variable. In order to evaluate the effects of sex and treatment on the fluid pl eference in each experimental day, rnean comparisons were planned a priori in the ANOVA model.
Although preferred embodiments have been described herein in detail, it is understood by those skilled in the art that variations and modifications may be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope thereof as defined by the appended claims.

SIIJ~ ~ JTE SHEET (RULE 26) :

U -5 -50 U 9G I ' 7 0 -92 - - 0 -12 ~ 0 12 -12 0 U 0~ ' 0 -56 - ~27 -~ ~ 0 ~'4 -I 1 127 ~ 0 0 -1_~ 7- -lO~ 0 ~6 -9 72I_ . - . 0 0 -I 7_ -5C () 18 -5 ~ 72 2- _' - 0 0 -'~ 2 G0 J - ' 3~ -I. 0 0 - ' t2- Z4 /2 U - 48 - I -I 0 0 ( -t. I 7' 3G
84 ' -t'lGt - 0~ - 7 D 0 0 -I 7' -8 '~¢~ :- -I 7_ -5 ~ - O 0 0 -'' - O
8 -'~ 8- ll O o O - -. '2 _0 ~ - 9 1 2' ~ 0 0 0 - I . ~4 7 G tl 7' 0 U 0 0 0 -I )fi . 77' '0 7" 0 0 0 0 (J -"' g - 8 8- . _7 -5~ 0 0 0 (J 0 - .: 0 - G 9G '~' '7 -5~ 0 0 0 (J 0 C '7 -04 08 ~ fi-1. g -12~ 0 0 0 0 0 o '7 -50 20 -8 -I G -t I ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 28 o ' 7 fi ~-IU4 -9 0 0 0 0 0 0 - IG
1 27 7 7' -S -S 0 0 0 Cl 0 o 04 /2 - ~g g ( 0 0 0 (J 0 U -50 72 - 6 g 1 2' ~ 0 ) 0 U 0 0 0 - . - 04 r r 0 0 ) 0 0 ~ 0 127 - ~ -5~ : '. 0 ~ 0 ( ~ 1 - . t . 0 ~ ~ 7 -I t~7 ' - 2 ~ ~
-'l 7_ - . -t_l 3 c -;~ 7 - -I ~ 4 ~ ~ 0 C -I. 1 O G : . 0 0 t - I
- - ~ - 0 7 ( 0 0 C -"_ -t_~ 0 0 8 -~ ~ 0 0 '.~ -I 127 - 0 9 G 1' 0 h G - ' /. 0 t ~_ 2 0 0 0 ~8 - " 0 ' ' 3 0 0 0 0 - ~ 4 1 r 0 0 0 2 - . ' ,7 - ~0 I' 0 0 0 ~4 :-I . '~ O ~ - ' 8 ' 72 2 0 0 0 9G '~-tl 0 - - 6 '7 84 3 0 ~ 0 C8 -9' 0 G - 4 . 7 ~ 4~ 0 ) 0 ' 0 - -5 0 7' - - _R " G0 12 ~ 0 ~7 G~ 0 8 - G ' 72 24 ~ 0 .7 7' r ~, 12" ~4 -r 84 3G 0 0 -' 8 1 . 7' - O _'' 96 48 0 -IG (; ( ' 7' - ' 1 08 G0 0 -04 g C ' . ' - I - - . t 72 0 -S ~ t O_~' 7 - - -- _~ ' O
~ ' o . - _8 - I _ ' - ~ U 0 12' _: 0 - G -I - - . 0 0 7: _: O ~ - 4 -'~ - I 2 ' - ' O O
72 - 0'_ - 0 - -1_ 7. - -- : ' 0 U
-53 -~-- 0 1 0 -I 7_ - 0 _ 0 () -Table 1 SlJe~:j 111 IJTE SHEET (RULE 263 :

oo ~-8 oo ~) V( -i ~ o o o~ -14 u o ~) - o o o r3 0 0 ~I J 1~7 ' O D
O ~ _~ O O
O ~ '. O t O ~ -. O
~J o -- ~: o t () o - I . . t~ ( (I o ~ ~ o o ~) O - . I~ O O
o o - ~ ~~ o :1 o . ~(~ o ' 7~) -'1~ 0 r3 . 7 o O - O
J q ~i - r~
O- l)~O
:1 0 0-S( ( O
~' O O O O
'~1 0 0127 _ O
~ri O ~ 7 ~ o 1~ 0 ~ ' O
(,0 0 ~ - -~2 0 R4 0 - I ' -2 ~ri O -i ~4 ()R () ( -'' 6 ' O O - ~R
7 0 ~0 t 7 0 ~ ~ 27 0 .8 o o ~ 7 o 1~ o o o -:8 o ~r~ o o o . 6 o -~o o o o -c4 o 1~ 0 0 0 -SO O

7- 4 o ~127 0 ~. 6 0 ) 72 0 -S'~ R J '' O
.~. n - o - o 1~. ~1. 1 .9 -s ; .~ ( - f O _ ) O_~ O
Table 1 (continued) S~ 111iJTE SHEET (RULE 263 Experimental Response Latency Conditionsec+sem (n) Sham 4.9+0.2 (45) Acute Cnp10.5_0.4 (15) Repeated Cnp 7.2+0.3 (15) Cnp + vehicle 9.4+0.3 (48) Cnp + Naloxone 7.7+0.3 ~21) Cnp + 5'-NTII 7.3_0.3 (22) sem (Standard Error of the Mean) Table 2 SUts~ 111 UTE SHEET (RULE 26) REFE;~NCES

1. Kavaliers, M.; Ossenkopp, K.-P. (1991) Opioid systems and magnetic field effects in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis. Biol. Bull. 1~0:301-309.

2. Prato, F.S., Ossenkopp, K-P., Kaveliers, M., Sestini, E.A. & Teskey, G. C.
(1987) Att~nll~tion of morphine-induced analgesia in mice by exposure to magnetic resonance im~gTng Separate effects of the static, radiofrequency and time-varying magnetic fields. Mag Res. Imag 5, 9-14.
3. Betancur7 ~., Dell'Omo, G. and Alleva, E., (1994) Magnetic field effects on stress-induced analgesia in mice: modulation by light, Neurosci. Lett., 182 147-150.

4. Kavaliers, M.; Ossenkopp, K-P.; Prato, F.S.; Carson, J. (1994) Opioid systemsand the bilogical effects of magnetic fields. In Frey AH (ed): On the nature of electromagnetic field interactions with biological systems. Austin, RG Landis Co~
ppl81-190.

5. Del Seppia, C.; Ghione, S.; Luchi, P.; Papi, E. (1995) Exposure to oscillating magnetic fields influences scnsitivity to electrical stimuli. l: Experiments on pigeons.
Bioelectromagnetics 16:290-294.

6. Papi, F.; Ghione, S.; Rosa, C.; Del Seppia, C.; Luschi, P. (1995) Exposure tooscillating magnetic fields influences sensitivity to electrical stimuli. II: Experiments on h~ n~ Bioelectromegnetics. 16:295-300.

7. Papi, F.; Luschi, P. & Limonta, P. (1991) Orientation-disturbing magnetic treatment affects the pigeon opioid system. J. exp. Biol. 160, 169-179.

SIJ~ I I I IJTE SH~ET ~RULE 26) CA 022~7266 l998-l2-02 8. Kavaliers, M., Eckel, L.A. & Ossenkopp, K-P. (1993) Brief exposure to 60 Hz magnetic fields improves scxually dimorphic spatial learning performance in themeadow vole, Microtus pennsvlvanicus. J. comp. P~lysiol. A 173, 241-248.

9. Kavaliers, M., Ossenkopp, K-P., Prato, F.S. et al. (1996) Spatial learning indeer mice: sex differences and the effects of endogenous opiods and 60 Hz magnetic fields. J. comp. P~lysiol ~ (In the press).

10. PoLk, C. (1992) Dosimetry of extremely low frequency magnetic fields.
Bioelectromagnetics Supp 1, 209-235.

11. Weaver, J. S. & Astumian, R.D. (1990). The response of living cells to very weak electric fields; the thermal noise limit. Science Wash. 247 459-462.

12. Kirschvink, J.L. & Walker, M.M. (1985). Particle size considerations for magnetite-based magnetoreceptors. In Magnetite biomineralisation and magnetoreception in organisms: a new biomagnetism (ed. J.L. Kirschvink, r~.s.
Johnes & B.J. MacFadden), pp. 243-256. New York:Plenum Press.

13. Prato, F.S., Kavaliers, M. & Carson, J.J.L.(1996a) Behavioural evidence thatmagnetic field effects in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis might not depend on magnetite or induced electric cu~Tents. Bioelectromagnétics 17 123-130.

14. Rothman, R.B.(1996) ~ review ofthe role of anti-opioid peptides in morphine tolerance and dependence. Synapse. 12:129-136.

15. Kavaliers, M.; Hirst, M. (1983) Tolerance to the morphine-influenced thermalresponse in the terrestrial snail, Cepea nemoralis. Neuropharmacology. 22(11): 1321 -1326.

SIJ~ 111 ~JTE SHEET (RULE 26) 16. Thomas, A.W.; Kavaliers, M.; Prato, F.S.; Ossen'kopp, K-P. (1997) Antinociceptive effects of a pulsed magnetic field in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis.
Neurosci Lett. 222:107-110.

17. Thomas, A.W.; Kavaliers, M.; Prato, F.S.; Ossenkopp, K-P. ~in press, 1997) Pulsed magnetic field induced "analgesia" in the land snail, Cepaea ~emoralis, and the effects of la, ~, and K opioid receptor agonistslantagonists. Peptides.

18. Thomas, A.W.; Persinger, M.A. (1997) Daily post-training exposure to pulsed magnetic fields that evoke morphine-like analgesia affects consequent motivation but not proficiency in maze learning in rats. Electro-and Magnetobiology. 16(1):33-41.

19. Kavaliers, M.; Hirst, M.; Teskey, G.C. (1983) A functional role for an opioid system in snail thermal behavior. Science. 220:99-101.

20. Kavaliers, M.; Ossenkopp, K.-P. (1985) Tolerance to morphine-induced analgesia in mice: magnetic fields function as ~nvi~ lental specific cues and reduce tolerance development. Life Sci. 37:1125-1135.

21. Tiffany, S.T.; Maude-Gril~fin, P.M. (1988) Tolerance to morphine in the rat:associative and non-associative effects. Behav. Neurosci. 102:434-443.

22. Tian, J-H.; Xu, W.; Zhang, W.; ~ang, Y.; Grisel, J.E.; Mogil, J.S.; Grandy, D.K.; ~Ian, J-S. (1997) Involvement of endogenous Orphanin FQ in electroacupuncture-induced analgesia. Neuroreport. 8:497-500.

23. Tiffany, S.T.; Bal~er, T.B.(1981) Morphine tolerance in rats: congreunce with a pavlovian paradigm. J Comp. Physiol. Psych. 95:747-762.

SIJ~ 111 UTE SHEET (RULE 26) 24. Baker, T.B.; Tiffany, S.T. (1985) Morphine tolerance as habituation.
Psychological Reviews. 92-78-108.

25. Girsel, J.E.G.; Watkins, L.R.; Maier, S.F. (1996) Associative and non-associative mech~ni~m~ of morphine analgesia tolerance are neurochemically distinct in the rat spinal cord. Psychopharmacology. 128:245-255.

26. Prato, F.S.; Carson, J.L.L.; Ossenkopp, K.-P; Kavaliers, M. (1995) Possible me(~h~ni.cm~ by which extremely low frequency magnetic ficlds affect opioid function. ~ASEB. J. 9:807-814.

27. Kits, S.K.; Mansveider, H.D.(1996~ Voltage gated calcium channels in molluscs: classification, CA'- dependent inactivation, modul~tion and functionalroles. Invertebrate Neuroscience. 2:9-34.

28. Prato, F.S.; Kavaliers, M.; Carson, J.L.L. (1996) Behavioral evidence that magnetic field effects in the land snail, Cepaea nemoralis, might not depend on m~netite or induced electric currents. Bioelectromagnetics. 17:123-130.

29. Smith, K.H., Jr. (1987) Quantified aspects of pallial ~uid and its affect on the duration of locomotor activity in the terrestrial gastropod Triolopsis albolabaris.
Physiol. Zool. 54:407-414 30. Dyakonova, V.; Elofsson, R.; Carlberg, M.; Sakharov, D.(1995) Complex avoidance behavior and its neurochemical regulation in thc land snail, Cepaea nemoralis. Gen. Pharmacol. 26:773-777.

31. Michon A, Koren SA, Persinger MA (1996): Perceptual a~ld Motor Skills 82:619-626.

SlJ~ JTE SH~ET (RULE 26) -32. Baker-Price L.A. and M. A. Persinger, (1996) Weak, but complex pulsed magnetic fields may reduce deprcssion following traumatic brain injury. Pcrceptual afzd Motor Skills, 83, 491-498.

5 33. M. Kaveliers, K.-P. Ossenkopp, F.S. Prato, D.G. L. Innes, L.A. M. Galea, D.M. Kinsella, T.S. Perrot-Sinal, (1996) Spatial learning in deer mice: sex differences and the effects of endogenous opioids and 60 Hz Magnetic rlelds. J. Com. Physio A
179.

SlJ~ 111 ~)TE SHEET (RUI E 26)

Claims (23)

1. A method for treating a disorder selected from the group of physiological, neurological and behavioral disorders, said method comprising applying to a subject a specific low frequency pulsed magnetic field (Cnp) having a plurality of intermittent waveforms, for a time effective to produce a desired effect in a target tissue.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of waveforms are configured with length and frequency relative to the target tissue.

3. The method of claim wherein said waveforms are configured to mimic generally the underlying electrical activity of said target tissue.

4. The method of claim 2, wherein said plurality of waveforms have a built-in variable latency period.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein said low frequency pulsed magnetic field has a fixed refractory period relative to said target tissue.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said method is used to treat disorders selected from the group consisting of pain, anxiety, balance, learning, taste aversion, epilepsy and depression.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said Cnp used in the method is selected from the Cnps of Figure 1, Figure 3 or Figure 5.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the frequency and length of said waveforms vary over time.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the frequency of said waveforms decrease over time.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the frequency of said waveforms increase over time.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein said waveforms have fast rise times and are configured to stimulate firing of axons in said target tissue.

12. The method of claim 1 wherein said waveforms define variable latency periods, said latency periods being selected to reduce the probability of neuralexcitement as the waveforms end.

13. The method of claim wherein said waveforms have amplitudes and DC offsets selected in relation to said target tissue.

14. A method of treating physiological, neurological and behavioral disorders comprising the step of subjecting target tissue to intermittent specific time varying low frequency magnetic fields for a duration effective to produce a desired effect, said intermittent magnetic fields being separated by refractory periods.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said magnetic fields have waveforms configured relative to said target tissue.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein said waveforms are configured to mimic generally the underlying electrical activity of said target tissue.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein the frequency and length of said waveforms vary over time.

18. The method of claim 15 wherein the frequency of said waveforms decrease over time.

19. The method of claim 15 wherein the frequency of said waveforms increase over time.

20. The method of claim 14 wherein said refractory periods are fixed at a duration relative to said target tissue.

21. The method of claim 15 wherein said waveforms have fast rise times and are configured to stimulate firing of axons in said target tissue.

22. The method of claim 15 wherein said waveforms define variable latency periods, said latency periods being selected to reduce the probability of neuralexcitement as the waveforms end.

23. The method of claim 15 wherein said waveforms have amplitudes and DC
offsets selected in relation to said target tissue.