CA2242065C - Unified messaging system with automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion - Google Patents
Unified messaging system with automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2242065C CA2242065C CA002242065A CA2242065A CA2242065C CA 2242065 C CA2242065 C CA 2242065C CA 002242065 A CA002242065 A CA 002242065A CA 2242065 A CA2242065 A CA 2242065A CA 2242065 C CA2242065 C CA 2242065C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- text message
- occurrence
- text
- characters
- speech
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L51/00—User-to-user messaging in packet-switching networks, transmitted according to store-and-forward or real-time protocols, e.g. e-mail
- H04L51/06—Message adaptation to terminal or network requirements
- H04L51/066—Format adaptation, e.g. format conversion or compression
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L13/00—Speech synthesis; Text to speech systems
- G10L13/08—Text analysis or generation of parameters for speech synthesis out of text, e.g. grapheme to phoneme translation, prosody generation or stress or intonation determination
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L15/00—Speech recognition
- G10L15/005—Language recognition
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M3/00—Automatic or semi-automatic exchanges
- H04M3/42—Systems providing special services or facilities to subscribers
- H04M3/50—Centralised arrangements for answering calls; Centralised arrangements for recording messages for absent or busy subscribers ; Centralised arrangements for recording messages
- H04M3/53—Centralised arrangements for recording incoming messages, i.e. mailbox systems
- H04M3/5307—Centralised arrangements for recording incoming messages, i.e. mailbox systems for recording messages comprising any combination of audio and non-audio components
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04M—TELEPHONIC COMMUNICATION
- H04M2201/00—Electronic components, circuits, software, systems or apparatus used in telephone systems
- H04M2201/60—Medium conversion
Abstract
A unified messaging system includes a voice gateway server coupled to a n electronics mail system and a private branch exchange (PBX). The voice gatew ay server provides voice messaging services to a set of subscribers. Within the voice gateway server, a trigraph analyzer sequentially examines 3-character combinations within a text message; determines occurrence frequencies for the character combinations; compares the occurrence frequencies with reference occurrence statistics modeled from text samples written in particular languages; and generates a language identifier and a likelihood value for the text message. Based upon the language identifier, a message inquiry unit selects an appropriate text-to-speech engine for converting the text message into computer-generated speech that is played to a subscriber.
Description
UNIFIED MESSAGING SYSTEM WITH AUTOMATIC LANGUAGE
IDENTIFICATION FOR TEXT-TO-SPEECH CONVERSION
The present invention relates to systems and methods for voice and text messaging, as well as systems and method for language recognition. More particularly, the present invention is a communications system that automatically identifies a language associated with a text message, and performs an appropriate text-to-speech conversion.
Computer-based techniques for converting text into speech have become well-known in recent years. Via such techniques, textual data is translated to audio information by a text-to-speech conversion "engine," which most commonly comprises software. Examples of text-to-speech software include Apple Computer's Speech Manager (Apple Computer corporation, Cupertino, CA), and Digital Equipment Corporation's DECTaIkTM (Digital Equipment Corporation, Cambridge, MA). In addition to converting textual data into speech, such software is responsive to user commands for controlling volume, pitch, rate, and other speech-related parameters.
A text-to-speech engine generally comprises a text analyzer, a syntax and context analyzer, and a synthesis module. The text analyzer, in conjunction with the syntax and context analyzer, utilizes a rule-based index to identify fundamental grammatical units within textual data. The fundamental grammatical units are typically word and/or phoneme-based, and the rule-based index is correspondingly referred to as a phoneme library. Those skilled in the art will understand that the phoneme library typically includes a word-based dictionary for the
IDENTIFICATION FOR TEXT-TO-SPEECH CONVERSION
The present invention relates to systems and methods for voice and text messaging, as well as systems and method for language recognition. More particularly, the present invention is a communications system that automatically identifies a language associated with a text message, and performs an appropriate text-to-speech conversion.
Computer-based techniques for converting text into speech have become well-known in recent years. Via such techniques, textual data is translated to audio information by a text-to-speech conversion "engine," which most commonly comprises software. Examples of text-to-speech software include Apple Computer's Speech Manager (Apple Computer corporation, Cupertino, CA), and Digital Equipment Corporation's DECTaIkTM (Digital Equipment Corporation, Cambridge, MA). In addition to converting textual data into speech, such software is responsive to user commands for controlling volume, pitch, rate, and other speech-related parameters.
A text-to-speech engine generally comprises a text analyzer, a syntax and context analyzer, and a synthesis module. The text analyzer, in conjunction with the syntax and context analyzer, utilizes a rule-based index to identify fundamental grammatical units within textual data. The fundamental grammatical units are typically word and/or phoneme-based, and the rule-based index is correspondingly referred to as a phoneme library. Those skilled in the art will understand that the phoneme library typically includes a word-based dictionary for the
-2-conversion of orthographic data into a phonemic representation. The synthesis module either assembles or generates speech sequences corresponding to the identified fundamental grammatical units, and plays the speech sequences to a listener.
Text-to-speech conversion can be very useful within the context of unified or integrated messaging systems. In such messaging systems, a voice processing server is coupled to an electronic mail system, such that a user's e-mail in-box provides message notification as well as access to messaging services for e-mail messages, voice messages, and possibly other types of messages such as faxes. An example of a unified messaging system is Octel's Unified MessengerTM (Octet Communications Corporation, Milpitas, CA). Such systems selectively translate an e-mail message into speech through the use of text-to-speech conversion. A user calling from a remote telephone can therefore readily listen to both voice and e-mail messages.
Thus, a unified messaging system employing text-to-speech conversion eliminates the need for a user to have direct access to their computer during message retrieval operations.
In many situations, messaging system users can expect to receive textual messages I S written in different languages. For example, a person conducting business in Europe might receive e-mail messages written in English, French, or German. To successfully convert text into speech within the context of a particular language requires a text-to-speech engine designed for that language. Thus, to successfully convert French text into spoken French requires a text-to-speech engine designed for the french language, including a French-specific phoneme library.
Attempting to convert French text into spoken language through the use of an English text-to-speech engine would likely produce a large amount of unintelligible output.
In the prior art, messaging systems rely upon a human reader to specify a given text-to-
Text-to-speech conversion can be very useful within the context of unified or integrated messaging systems. In such messaging systems, a voice processing server is coupled to an electronic mail system, such that a user's e-mail in-box provides message notification as well as access to messaging services for e-mail messages, voice messages, and possibly other types of messages such as faxes. An example of a unified messaging system is Octel's Unified MessengerTM (Octet Communications Corporation, Milpitas, CA). Such systems selectively translate an e-mail message into speech through the use of text-to-speech conversion. A user calling from a remote telephone can therefore readily listen to both voice and e-mail messages.
Thus, a unified messaging system employing text-to-speech conversion eliminates the need for a user to have direct access to their computer during message retrieval operations.
In many situations, messaging system users can expect to receive textual messages I S written in different languages. For example, a person conducting business in Europe might receive e-mail messages written in English, French, or German. To successfully convert text into speech within the context of a particular language requires a text-to-speech engine designed for that language. Thus, to successfully convert French text into spoken French requires a text-to-speech engine designed for the french language, including a French-specific phoneme library.
Attempting to convert French text into spoken language through the use of an English text-to-speech engine would likely produce a large amount of unintelligible output.
In the prior art, messaging systems rely upon a human reader to specify a given text-to-
-3-speech engine to be used in converting a message into speech. Alternatively, some systems enable a message originator to specify a language identification code that is sent with the message. Both approaches are inefficient and inconvenient. What is needed is a messaging system providing automatic written language identification as a prelude to text-to-speech conversion.
The present invention is a unified messaging system providing automatic language identification for the conversion of textual messages into speech. The unified messaging system comprises a voice gateway server coupled to a computer network and a Private Branch Exchange (PBX). The computer network includes a plurality of computers coupled to a file server, through which computer users identified in an electronic mail (e-mail) directory exchange messages. The voice gateway server facilitates the exchange of messages between computer users and a telephone system, and additionally provides voice messsaging services to subscribers, each of whom is preferably a computer user identified in the e-mail directory.
The voice gateway server preferably comprises a voice board, a network interface unit, a processing unit, a data storage unit, and a memory wherein a set of voice messaging application units; a message buffer; a plurality of text-to-speech engines and corresponding phoneme libraries; a trigraph analyzer; and a set of corecurrence libraries reside. Each voice messaging application unit comprises program instructions for providing voice messaging functions such as call answering, automated attendant, and message store/forward operations to voice messaging subscribers.
A message inquiry unit directs message playback operations. In response to a subscriber's
The present invention is a unified messaging system providing automatic language identification for the conversion of textual messages into speech. The unified messaging system comprises a voice gateway server coupled to a computer network and a Private Branch Exchange (PBX). The computer network includes a plurality of computers coupled to a file server, through which computer users identified in an electronic mail (e-mail) directory exchange messages. The voice gateway server facilitates the exchange of messages between computer users and a telephone system, and additionally provides voice messsaging services to subscribers, each of whom is preferably a computer user identified in the e-mail directory.
The voice gateway server preferably comprises a voice board, a network interface unit, a processing unit, a data storage unit, and a memory wherein a set of voice messaging application units; a message buffer; a plurality of text-to-speech engines and corresponding phoneme libraries; a trigraph analyzer; and a set of corecurrence libraries reside. Each voice messaging application unit comprises program instructions for providing voice messaging functions such as call answering, automated attendant, and message store/forward operations to voice messaging subscribers.
A message inquiry unit directs message playback operations. In response to a subscriber's
-4-issuance of a voice message review request, the message inquiry unit plays the subscriber's voice messages in a conventional manner. In response to a text message review request, the message inquiry unit initiates automatic language identification operations, followed by a text-to-speech conversion performed in accordance with the results of the language identification operations.
The trigraph analyzer examines a text sequence, and performs language identification operations by first determining the occurrence frequencies of sequential 3-character combinations within the text, and then comparing the determined occurrence frequencies with reference occurrence statistics for various languages. The set of reference occurrence statistics associated with a given language are stored together as a corecurrence library. The trigraph analyzer determines a closest match between the determined occurrence frequencies and a particular corecurrence library, and returns a corresponding language identifier and likelihood value to the message inquiry unit.
The message inquiry unit subsequently selects a text-to-speech engine and an associated phoneme library, and initiates the conversion of the text message into computer-generated speech that is played to the subscriber in a conventional manner.
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a unified messaging system constructed in accordance with the present invention.
Figure 2 is a block diagram of a first and preferred embodiment of a voice server constructed in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 3 is a flowchart of a first and preferred method for providing automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion in the present invention;
Figure 4 is a block diagram of a second embodiment of a voice server constructed in
The trigraph analyzer examines a text sequence, and performs language identification operations by first determining the occurrence frequencies of sequential 3-character combinations within the text, and then comparing the determined occurrence frequencies with reference occurrence statistics for various languages. The set of reference occurrence statistics associated with a given language are stored together as a corecurrence library. The trigraph analyzer determines a closest match between the determined occurrence frequencies and a particular corecurrence library, and returns a corresponding language identifier and likelihood value to the message inquiry unit.
The message inquiry unit subsequently selects a text-to-speech engine and an associated phoneme library, and initiates the conversion of the text message into computer-generated speech that is played to the subscriber in a conventional manner.
Figure 1 is a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a unified messaging system constructed in accordance with the present invention.
Figure 2 is a block diagram of a first and preferred embodiment of a voice server constructed in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 3 is a flowchart of a first and preferred method for providing automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion in the present invention;
Figure 4 is a block diagram of a second embodiment of a voice server constructed in
-5-accordance with the present invention; and Figure 5 is a flowchart of a second method for providing automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion in the present invention.
Referring now to Figure l, a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a unified messaging system 100 constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown. The unified messaging system 100 comprises a set of telephones 110, 112, 114 coupled to a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) 120; a computer network 130 comprising a plurality of computers 132 coupled to a file server 134 via a network line 136, where the file server 134 is additionally coupled to a data storage device 138; and a voice gateway server 140 that is coupled to the network line 136, and coupled to the PBX 120 via a set of telephone lines 142 as well as an integration link 144. The PBX 120 is further coupled to a telephone network via a collection of trunks 122, 124, 126. The unified messaging system 100 shown in Figure 1 is equivalent to that described in U.S. Patent No. 5,557,659. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the teachings of the present invention are applicable to essentially any unified or integrated messaging environment.
In the present invention, conventional software executing upon the computer network 130 provides file transfer services, group access to software applications, as well as an electronic mail (e-mail) system through which computer user can transfer messages as well a message attachments between their computers 132 via the file server 134. In an exemplary embodiment, Microsoft ExchangeTM software (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) executes upon the
Referring now to Figure l, a block diagram of a preferred embodiment of a unified messaging system 100 constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown. The unified messaging system 100 comprises a set of telephones 110, 112, 114 coupled to a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) 120; a computer network 130 comprising a plurality of computers 132 coupled to a file server 134 via a network line 136, where the file server 134 is additionally coupled to a data storage device 138; and a voice gateway server 140 that is coupled to the network line 136, and coupled to the PBX 120 via a set of telephone lines 142 as well as an integration link 144. The PBX 120 is further coupled to a telephone network via a collection of trunks 122, 124, 126. The unified messaging system 100 shown in Figure 1 is equivalent to that described in U.S. Patent No. 5,557,659. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the teachings of the present invention are applicable to essentially any unified or integrated messaging environment.
In the present invention, conventional software executing upon the computer network 130 provides file transfer services, group access to software applications, as well as an electronic mail (e-mail) system through which computer user can transfer messages as well a message attachments between their computers 132 via the file server 134. In an exemplary embodiment, Microsoft ExchangeTM software (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA) executes upon the
-6-computer network 130 to provide such functionality. Within the file server 134, an e-mail directory associates each computer user's name with a message storage location, or "in-box,"
and a network address, in a manner that will be readily understood by those skilled in the art. The voice gateway server 140 facilitates the exchange of messages between the computer network 130 and a telephone system. Additionally, the voice gateway server 140 provides voice messaging service such as call answering, automated attendant, voice message store and forward, and message inquiry operations to voice messaging subscribers. In the preferred embodiment, each subscriber is a computer user identified in the e-mail directory, that is, having a computer 132 coupled to the network 130. Those skilled in the art will recognize that in an alternate embodiment, the voice messaging subscribers could be a subset of computer users. In yet another alternate embodiment, the computer users could be a subset of a larger pool of voice messaging subscribers, which might be useful when the voice gateway server is primarily used for call answering.
Referring also now to Figure 2, a block diagram of a first and preferred embodiment of a voice gateway server 140 constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown.
In the preferred embodiment, the voice gateway server 140 comprises a voice board 200, a network interface unit 202, a processing unit 204, a data storage unit 206, and a memory 210 wherein a plurality of voice messaging application units 220, 222, 224; a message inquiry unit 226; a message buffer 230; a set of text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 and corresponding phoneme libraries 252, 253, 254; a trigraph analyzer 260; and a plurality of corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 reside. Each element within the voice gateway server 140 is coupled to a common bus 299. The network interface unit 202 is additionally coupled to the network line 136,
and a network address, in a manner that will be readily understood by those skilled in the art. The voice gateway server 140 facilitates the exchange of messages between the computer network 130 and a telephone system. Additionally, the voice gateway server 140 provides voice messaging service such as call answering, automated attendant, voice message store and forward, and message inquiry operations to voice messaging subscribers. In the preferred embodiment, each subscriber is a computer user identified in the e-mail directory, that is, having a computer 132 coupled to the network 130. Those skilled in the art will recognize that in an alternate embodiment, the voice messaging subscribers could be a subset of computer users. In yet another alternate embodiment, the computer users could be a subset of a larger pool of voice messaging subscribers, which might be useful when the voice gateway server is primarily used for call answering.
Referring also now to Figure 2, a block diagram of a first and preferred embodiment of a voice gateway server 140 constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown.
In the preferred embodiment, the voice gateway server 140 comprises a voice board 200, a network interface unit 202, a processing unit 204, a data storage unit 206, and a memory 210 wherein a plurality of voice messaging application units 220, 222, 224; a message inquiry unit 226; a message buffer 230; a set of text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 and corresponding phoneme libraries 252, 253, 254; a trigraph analyzer 260; and a plurality of corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 reside. Each element within the voice gateway server 140 is coupled to a common bus 299. The network interface unit 202 is additionally coupled to the network line 136,
7 and the voice board 200 is coupled to the PBX 120.
The voice board 200 preferably comprises conventional circuitry that interfaces a computer system with telephone switching equipment, and provides telephony and voice processing functions. The network interface unit 202 preferably comprises conventional circuitry that manages data transfers between the voice gateway server 140 and the computer network 130.
In the preferred embodiment, the processing unit 204 and the data storage unit 206 are also conventional.
The voice messaging application units 220, 222, 224 provide voice messaging services to subscribers, including call answering, automated attendant, and voice message store and forward operations. A message inquiry unit 226 directs telephone-based message playback operations in response to a subscriber request. In response to a voice message review request, the message inquiry unit 226 initiates the retrieval of a voice message associated with the subscriber's in-box, followed by the playing of the voice message to the user via the telephone in a conventional manner. In response to a text message review request, the message inquiry unit 226 initiates retrieval of a text message associated with the subscriber's in-box, followed by automatic language recognition and text-to-speech conversion operations, as described in detail below with reference to Figure 3. In the preferred embodiment, each voice messaging application unit 220, 222, 224 comprises program instruction sequences that are executable by the processing unit 204.
The message buffer 230 comprises a portion of the memory 210 reserved for temporarily storing messages before or after message exchange with the file server 134.
The text-to-speech _g_ engines 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 preferably comprise conventional software for translating textual data into speech. Those skilled in the art will readily understand that in an alternate embodiment, one or more portions of a text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 could be implemented using hardware.
The number of text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 resident within the memory 210 at any given time is determined according to the language environment in which the present invention is employed. In the preferred embodiment, the memory 210 includes a text-tospeech engine 242, 243, 244 for each language within a group of most-commonly expected languages.
Additional text-to-speech engines 245, 246 preferably reside upon the data storage unit 206, and are loaded into the memory 210 when text-to-speech conversion for a language outside the aforementioned group is required, as described in detail below. In an exemplary embodiment, text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 corresponding to English, French, and German reside within the memory 210, while text-to-speech engines 245, 246 for Portuguese, Italian, and/or other languages reside upon the data storage unit 206. Those skilled in the art will recognize that in an alternate embodiment, the number of text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 resident within the memory could be determined according to a memory management technique, such as virtual memory methods, where text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 are conventionally swapped out to the data storage unit 206 as required.
The memory 210 preferably includes a conventional phoneme library 252, 253, corresponding to each text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244 residing therein. In the preferred embodiment, a phoneme library 255, 256 also resides upon the data storage unit 206 for each text-to-speech engine 245, 246 stored thereupon.
The present invention preferably relies upon n-graph method for textual language identification, in particular, techniques developed by Clive Souter and Gavin Churcher at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom, as reported in I) "Bigram and Trigram Models for Language Identification and Classification," Proceedings of the AISB Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Speech and Handwriting Recognition, University of Leeds, 1994;
2) "Natural Language Identification Using Corpus-Based Models," Hermes Journal of Linguistics 13: 183-204, 1994; and 3) "N-gram Tools for Generic Symbol Processing," M. Sc.
Thesis of Phil Cave, School of Computer Studies, University of Leeds, 1995.
In n-graph language identification, the occurrence frequencies of successive n-character combinations within a textual message are compared with reference n-character occurrence statistics associated with particular languages. The reference statistics for any given language are automatically derived or modeled from text samples taken from that language.
Herein, the reference n-character occurrence statistics for a given language are stored together as a corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276.
The present invention preferably employs the trigraph analyzer 260 and corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 to perform trigraph-based language identification, that is, language identification based upon the statistical occurrences of three-letter combinations. In the preferred embodiment, the memory 210 includes a corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 corresponding to each text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, within the memory 210 as well as each text-to-speech engine 245, 246 stored upon the data storage device 206.
The trigraph analyzer 260 returns a language identifier and a likelihood or percentage value that indicates relative language identification certainty. As developed at the University of Leeds, the trigraph analyzer 260 is approximately 100% accurate when textual input comprises at least 175 characters. The trigraph analyzer 260 additionally maintains high language identification accuracy, typically greater than 90%, for shorter-length text sequences.
In an exemplary embodiment, the voice gateway server 140 is a personal computer having a 200 MHz Intel PentiumTM Processor (Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA); 128 Megabytes of Random Access Memory (RAM); an Ethernet-based network interface unit 202; a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks (RAID) drive serving as the data storage unit 206; a Rhetorex voice board (Rhetorex Corporation, San Jose" CA); DECTaIkTM text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 and corresponding phoneme libraries 252, 253, 254, 255, 256 (Digital Equipment Corporation, Cambridge, MA); the aforementioned trigraph analyzer 260 and associated corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 developed at the University of Leeds;
and voice messaging application units 220, 222, 224 implemented using Octet's Unified MessengerTM software (Octet Communications Corporation, Milpitas, CA).
Referring now to Figure 3, a flowchart of a first and preferred method for providing automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion is shown. The preferred method begins in step 300 in response to a subscriber's issuance of a text message review request, with the message inquiry unit 226 retrieving a text message from the subscriber's in-box, or from a particular data file or folder as specified by the subscriber. In the preferred embodiment, the subscriber's in-box corresponds to a file server storage location, and the retrieved text message is transferred to the message buffer 230. Following step 300, the message inquiry unit 226 issues an identification directive to the trigraph analyzer 260 in step 302, thereby initiating language identification.
In response to the identification directive, the trigraph analyzer 260 examines successive 3-character combinations within the text message currently under consideration, and determines occurrence frequencies for the character combinations in step 304. In the preferred embodiment, the trigraph analyzer 260 examines the first 175 characters of the text message in the event that the text message is sufficiently long; otherwise, the trigraph analyzer 260 examines the longest character sequence possible.
Following the determination of the occurrence frequencies for the current text message, the trigraph analyzer 260 compares the occurrence frequencies with the reference occurrence statistics in each corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 and determines a closest match with a particular corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 in step 308. Upon determining the closest match, the trigraph analyzer 260 returns a language identifier and an associated likelihood value to the message inquiry unit 226 in step 310. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the trigraph analyzer 260 could return a set of language identifiers and a likelihood value corresponding to each language identifier in an alternate embodiment.
As long as the text message is written in a language corresponding to one of the corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, the correlation between the occurrence frequencies and the reference occurrence statistics is likely to be sufficient for successful language identification. If the text message is written in a language that does not correspond to any of the corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 present, the correlation will be poor, and a closet match cannot be determined. In the event that the likelihood value returned by trigraph analyzer 260 is below a minimum acceptable threshold (for example, 20%), the message inquiry unit 226 plays a corresponding prerecorded message to the subscriber via steps 312 and 318. An exemplary prerecorded message could be "language identification unsuccessful."
Upon receiving the language identifier and an acceptable likelihood value, the message inquiry unit 226 selects the appropriate text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 in step 314.
In the event that the text-to-speech engine 244, 245 and its associated phoneme library 255, 256 do not presently reside within the memory 210, the message inquiry unit 226 transfers the required text-to-speech engine 244, 245 and the corresponding phoneme library 254, 255 from the data storage unit 206 into the memory 210.
After step 314, the message inquiry unit 226 issues a conversion directive to the selected text-to-speech engine 242,243,244,245,246 in step 316, following which the text message currently under consideration is converted to speech and played to the subscriber in a conventional manner. Upon completion of step 316, the message inquiry unit 226 determines whether another text message in the subscriber's in-box, or as specified by the subscriber, requires consideration in step 320. If so, the preferred method proceeds to step 300; otherwise, the preferred method ends.
In an alternate embodiment, steps 312 and 318 could be omitted, such that step directly proceeds to step 314 to produce a "best guess" text-to-speech conversion played to the subscriber. In such an alternate embodiment, the message inquiry unit 226 could 1 ) disregard the likelihood value; or 2) select the language identifier associated with a best likelihood value in the event that multiple language identifiers and likelihood values are returned.
In the preferred embodiment, textual language identification is performed, followed by text-to-speech conversion in the appropriate language. This results in the subscriber listening to computer-generated speech that matches the language in which the original text message was written. In an alternate embodiment, textual language identification could be performed, followed by text-to-text language conversion (i.e., translation), followed by text-to-speech conversion such that the subscriber listens to computer generated speech in a language with which the subscriber is most comfortable. To facilitate this alternate embodiment, a set of subscriber language preference selections are stored as user-configuration data within a subscriber information database or directory. The subscriber information database could reside within the voice gateway server 140, or it could be implemented in association with the file server's e-mail directory in a manner those skilled in the art will readily understand. Additionally, the voice gateway server 140 is modified to include additional elements, as described in detail hereafter.
Referring now to Figure 4, a block diagram of a second embodiment of a voice gateway server 141 constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown.
Elements common to both Figures 2 and 4 are numbered alike for ease of understanding. In addition to having the elements shown in Figure 2, the second embodiment of the voice gateway server 141 includes a set of conventional text translators 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, each having an associated word dictionary 292, 293, 294, 295, 296. Those skilled in the art will understand that the word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 are distinct from (i.e., not equivalent to) the phoneme libraries 252, 253, 254, 255, 256 in content and manner of use, and that each text translator 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 corresponds to a particular target language available for subscriber selection.
Text translators 282, 283, 284 and word dictionaries 292, 293, 294 corresponding to most-common subscriber preference selections reside within the memory 210, while those for less-frequently selected languages reside upon the data storage device 206, to be transferred into the memory 210 as required. Those skilled in the art will also understand that in an alternate embodiment, the text translators 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 and corresponding word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 could normally reside upon the data storage device 206, to be swapped into or out of the memory 210 as required during system operation. In an exemplary embodiment, the text translators 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 and word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 could be implemented using commercially-available software such as that provided by Translation Experts, Ltd. of London, England; or Language Partners International of Evanston, IL.
Referring now to Figure 5, a flowchart of a second method for providing automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion is shown. The second method begins in step 500 in response to a subscriber's issuance of a text message review request, with the message inquiry unit 226 retrieving the subscriber's language preference settings.
Next in step 501, the message inquiry unit retrieves a text message from the subscriber's in-box or from a data file or data folder as specified by the subscriber, and stores or copies the retrieved message into the message buffer 230. Following step 501, the message inquiry unit 226 issues an identification directive to the trigraph analyzer 260 in step 502, thereby initiating language identification.
Language identification is preferably performed in steps 504 through 512 in an analogous manner to that described above in steps 304 through 312 of Figure 3. Successful language identification results when the trigraph analyzer 260 returns a language identifier and a likelihood value greater than a minimum threshold value to the message inquiry unit 226.
Upon receiving a language identifier and an acceptable likelihood values the message inquiry unit 226 selects the appropriate text translator 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 and associated word dictionary 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 and issues a translation directive in step 514, thereby performing the translation of the current text message into the target language given by the subscriber' s language preference setting. Next, in step 516, the message inquiry unit 226 issues a conversion directive to the text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 that corresponds to the subscriber's language preference settings, causing the conversion of the translated text message to speech. The speech is preferably played to the subscriber in a conventional manner. Upon completion of step 516, the message inquiry unit 226 determines whether another text message in the subscriber's in-box or as specified by the subscriber requires consideration in step 520. If so, the preferred method proceeds to step 501; otherwise, the preferred method ends.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that in the alternate embodiments each word dictionary 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 should include words that may be particular to a given work environment in which the present invention may be employed. For example, use of the alternate embodiment in a computer-related business setting would necessitate word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 that include computer-related terms to ensure proper translation. In general the first and preferred embodiment of the present invention is more robust and flexible than the second embodiment because direct conversion of text into speech, without intermediate text-to-text translation, is not constrained by the limitations of a word dictionary and is less susceptible to problems arising from word spelling variations.
From above it can be seen that the present invention is related to a unified messaging system and includes a voice gateway server coupled to an electronic mail system and a private branch exchange (PBX). The voice gateway server provides voice messaging services to a set of subscribers. Within the voice gateway server, a ti-graph analyzer sequentially examines 3 character combinations; compares the occurrence frequencies with reference occurrence statistics modeled from text samples written in particular languages; and generates a language identifier;
and a likelihood value for the text message. Based upon the language identifiers a message inquiry unit selects an appropriate text-to-speech engine for converting the text message into computer-generated speech that is played to a subscriber.
While the present invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications can be provided.
For example, a language identification tool based upon techniques other than ngraph methods could be utilized instead of the trigraph analyzer 260 and associated corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276. As another examples one or more text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 could be implemented via hardware,such as through "off board" text-to-speech engines accessed through the use of remote procedure calls. As yet another example, converted speech data or translated text data could be stored for future use, which could be useful in a store-once, multiple-playback environment. The description herein provides for these and other variations upon the present invention, which is limited only by the following claims.
The voice board 200 preferably comprises conventional circuitry that interfaces a computer system with telephone switching equipment, and provides telephony and voice processing functions. The network interface unit 202 preferably comprises conventional circuitry that manages data transfers between the voice gateway server 140 and the computer network 130.
In the preferred embodiment, the processing unit 204 and the data storage unit 206 are also conventional.
The voice messaging application units 220, 222, 224 provide voice messaging services to subscribers, including call answering, automated attendant, and voice message store and forward operations. A message inquiry unit 226 directs telephone-based message playback operations in response to a subscriber request. In response to a voice message review request, the message inquiry unit 226 initiates the retrieval of a voice message associated with the subscriber's in-box, followed by the playing of the voice message to the user via the telephone in a conventional manner. In response to a text message review request, the message inquiry unit 226 initiates retrieval of a text message associated with the subscriber's in-box, followed by automatic language recognition and text-to-speech conversion operations, as described in detail below with reference to Figure 3. In the preferred embodiment, each voice messaging application unit 220, 222, 224 comprises program instruction sequences that are executable by the processing unit 204.
The message buffer 230 comprises a portion of the memory 210 reserved for temporarily storing messages before or after message exchange with the file server 134.
The text-to-speech _g_ engines 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 preferably comprise conventional software for translating textual data into speech. Those skilled in the art will readily understand that in an alternate embodiment, one or more portions of a text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 could be implemented using hardware.
The number of text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 resident within the memory 210 at any given time is determined according to the language environment in which the present invention is employed. In the preferred embodiment, the memory 210 includes a text-tospeech engine 242, 243, 244 for each language within a group of most-commonly expected languages.
Additional text-to-speech engines 245, 246 preferably reside upon the data storage unit 206, and are loaded into the memory 210 when text-to-speech conversion for a language outside the aforementioned group is required, as described in detail below. In an exemplary embodiment, text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 corresponding to English, French, and German reside within the memory 210, while text-to-speech engines 245, 246 for Portuguese, Italian, and/or other languages reside upon the data storage unit 206. Those skilled in the art will recognize that in an alternate embodiment, the number of text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 resident within the memory could be determined according to a memory management technique, such as virtual memory methods, where text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244 are conventionally swapped out to the data storage unit 206 as required.
The memory 210 preferably includes a conventional phoneme library 252, 253, corresponding to each text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244 residing therein. In the preferred embodiment, a phoneme library 255, 256 also resides upon the data storage unit 206 for each text-to-speech engine 245, 246 stored thereupon.
The present invention preferably relies upon n-graph method for textual language identification, in particular, techniques developed by Clive Souter and Gavin Churcher at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom, as reported in I) "Bigram and Trigram Models for Language Identification and Classification," Proceedings of the AISB Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Speech and Handwriting Recognition, University of Leeds, 1994;
2) "Natural Language Identification Using Corpus-Based Models," Hermes Journal of Linguistics 13: 183-204, 1994; and 3) "N-gram Tools for Generic Symbol Processing," M. Sc.
Thesis of Phil Cave, School of Computer Studies, University of Leeds, 1995.
In n-graph language identification, the occurrence frequencies of successive n-character combinations within a textual message are compared with reference n-character occurrence statistics associated with particular languages. The reference statistics for any given language are automatically derived or modeled from text samples taken from that language.
Herein, the reference n-character occurrence statistics for a given language are stored together as a corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276.
The present invention preferably employs the trigraph analyzer 260 and corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 to perform trigraph-based language identification, that is, language identification based upon the statistical occurrences of three-letter combinations. In the preferred embodiment, the memory 210 includes a corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 corresponding to each text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, within the memory 210 as well as each text-to-speech engine 245, 246 stored upon the data storage device 206.
The trigraph analyzer 260 returns a language identifier and a likelihood or percentage value that indicates relative language identification certainty. As developed at the University of Leeds, the trigraph analyzer 260 is approximately 100% accurate when textual input comprises at least 175 characters. The trigraph analyzer 260 additionally maintains high language identification accuracy, typically greater than 90%, for shorter-length text sequences.
In an exemplary embodiment, the voice gateway server 140 is a personal computer having a 200 MHz Intel PentiumTM Processor (Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, CA); 128 Megabytes of Random Access Memory (RAM); an Ethernet-based network interface unit 202; a Redundant Array of Inexpensive Disks (RAID) drive serving as the data storage unit 206; a Rhetorex voice board (Rhetorex Corporation, San Jose" CA); DECTaIkTM text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 and corresponding phoneme libraries 252, 253, 254, 255, 256 (Digital Equipment Corporation, Cambridge, MA); the aforementioned trigraph analyzer 260 and associated corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 developed at the University of Leeds;
and voice messaging application units 220, 222, 224 implemented using Octet's Unified MessengerTM software (Octet Communications Corporation, Milpitas, CA).
Referring now to Figure 3, a flowchart of a first and preferred method for providing automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion is shown. The preferred method begins in step 300 in response to a subscriber's issuance of a text message review request, with the message inquiry unit 226 retrieving a text message from the subscriber's in-box, or from a particular data file or folder as specified by the subscriber. In the preferred embodiment, the subscriber's in-box corresponds to a file server storage location, and the retrieved text message is transferred to the message buffer 230. Following step 300, the message inquiry unit 226 issues an identification directive to the trigraph analyzer 260 in step 302, thereby initiating language identification.
In response to the identification directive, the trigraph analyzer 260 examines successive 3-character combinations within the text message currently under consideration, and determines occurrence frequencies for the character combinations in step 304. In the preferred embodiment, the trigraph analyzer 260 examines the first 175 characters of the text message in the event that the text message is sufficiently long; otherwise, the trigraph analyzer 260 examines the longest character sequence possible.
Following the determination of the occurrence frequencies for the current text message, the trigraph analyzer 260 compares the occurrence frequencies with the reference occurrence statistics in each corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 and determines a closest match with a particular corecurrence library 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 in step 308. Upon determining the closest match, the trigraph analyzer 260 returns a language identifier and an associated likelihood value to the message inquiry unit 226 in step 310. Those skilled in the art will recognize that the trigraph analyzer 260 could return a set of language identifiers and a likelihood value corresponding to each language identifier in an alternate embodiment.
As long as the text message is written in a language corresponding to one of the corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, the correlation between the occurrence frequencies and the reference occurrence statistics is likely to be sufficient for successful language identification. If the text message is written in a language that does not correspond to any of the corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276 present, the correlation will be poor, and a closet match cannot be determined. In the event that the likelihood value returned by trigraph analyzer 260 is below a minimum acceptable threshold (for example, 20%), the message inquiry unit 226 plays a corresponding prerecorded message to the subscriber via steps 312 and 318. An exemplary prerecorded message could be "language identification unsuccessful."
Upon receiving the language identifier and an acceptable likelihood value, the message inquiry unit 226 selects the appropriate text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 in step 314.
In the event that the text-to-speech engine 244, 245 and its associated phoneme library 255, 256 do not presently reside within the memory 210, the message inquiry unit 226 transfers the required text-to-speech engine 244, 245 and the corresponding phoneme library 254, 255 from the data storage unit 206 into the memory 210.
After step 314, the message inquiry unit 226 issues a conversion directive to the selected text-to-speech engine 242,243,244,245,246 in step 316, following which the text message currently under consideration is converted to speech and played to the subscriber in a conventional manner. Upon completion of step 316, the message inquiry unit 226 determines whether another text message in the subscriber's in-box, or as specified by the subscriber, requires consideration in step 320. If so, the preferred method proceeds to step 300; otherwise, the preferred method ends.
In an alternate embodiment, steps 312 and 318 could be omitted, such that step directly proceeds to step 314 to produce a "best guess" text-to-speech conversion played to the subscriber. In such an alternate embodiment, the message inquiry unit 226 could 1 ) disregard the likelihood value; or 2) select the language identifier associated with a best likelihood value in the event that multiple language identifiers and likelihood values are returned.
In the preferred embodiment, textual language identification is performed, followed by text-to-speech conversion in the appropriate language. This results in the subscriber listening to computer-generated speech that matches the language in which the original text message was written. In an alternate embodiment, textual language identification could be performed, followed by text-to-text language conversion (i.e., translation), followed by text-to-speech conversion such that the subscriber listens to computer generated speech in a language with which the subscriber is most comfortable. To facilitate this alternate embodiment, a set of subscriber language preference selections are stored as user-configuration data within a subscriber information database or directory. The subscriber information database could reside within the voice gateway server 140, or it could be implemented in association with the file server's e-mail directory in a manner those skilled in the art will readily understand. Additionally, the voice gateway server 140 is modified to include additional elements, as described in detail hereafter.
Referring now to Figure 4, a block diagram of a second embodiment of a voice gateway server 141 constructed in accordance with the present invention is shown.
Elements common to both Figures 2 and 4 are numbered alike for ease of understanding. In addition to having the elements shown in Figure 2, the second embodiment of the voice gateway server 141 includes a set of conventional text translators 282, 283, 284, 285, 286, each having an associated word dictionary 292, 293, 294, 295, 296. Those skilled in the art will understand that the word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 are distinct from (i.e., not equivalent to) the phoneme libraries 252, 253, 254, 255, 256 in content and manner of use, and that each text translator 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 corresponds to a particular target language available for subscriber selection.
Text translators 282, 283, 284 and word dictionaries 292, 293, 294 corresponding to most-common subscriber preference selections reside within the memory 210, while those for less-frequently selected languages reside upon the data storage device 206, to be transferred into the memory 210 as required. Those skilled in the art will also understand that in an alternate embodiment, the text translators 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 and corresponding word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 could normally reside upon the data storage device 206, to be swapped into or out of the memory 210 as required during system operation. In an exemplary embodiment, the text translators 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 and word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 could be implemented using commercially-available software such as that provided by Translation Experts, Ltd. of London, England; or Language Partners International of Evanston, IL.
Referring now to Figure 5, a flowchart of a second method for providing automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion is shown. The second method begins in step 500 in response to a subscriber's issuance of a text message review request, with the message inquiry unit 226 retrieving the subscriber's language preference settings.
Next in step 501, the message inquiry unit retrieves a text message from the subscriber's in-box or from a data file or data folder as specified by the subscriber, and stores or copies the retrieved message into the message buffer 230. Following step 501, the message inquiry unit 226 issues an identification directive to the trigraph analyzer 260 in step 502, thereby initiating language identification.
Language identification is preferably performed in steps 504 through 512 in an analogous manner to that described above in steps 304 through 312 of Figure 3. Successful language identification results when the trigraph analyzer 260 returns a language identifier and a likelihood value greater than a minimum threshold value to the message inquiry unit 226.
Upon receiving a language identifier and an acceptable likelihood values the message inquiry unit 226 selects the appropriate text translator 282, 283, 284, 285, 286 and associated word dictionary 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 and issues a translation directive in step 514, thereby performing the translation of the current text message into the target language given by the subscriber' s language preference setting. Next, in step 516, the message inquiry unit 226 issues a conversion directive to the text-to-speech engine 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 that corresponds to the subscriber's language preference settings, causing the conversion of the translated text message to speech. The speech is preferably played to the subscriber in a conventional manner. Upon completion of step 516, the message inquiry unit 226 determines whether another text message in the subscriber's in-box or as specified by the subscriber requires consideration in step 520. If so, the preferred method proceeds to step 501; otherwise, the preferred method ends.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that in the alternate embodiments each word dictionary 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 should include words that may be particular to a given work environment in which the present invention may be employed. For example, use of the alternate embodiment in a computer-related business setting would necessitate word dictionaries 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 that include computer-related terms to ensure proper translation. In general the first and preferred embodiment of the present invention is more robust and flexible than the second embodiment because direct conversion of text into speech, without intermediate text-to-text translation, is not constrained by the limitations of a word dictionary and is less susceptible to problems arising from word spelling variations.
From above it can be seen that the present invention is related to a unified messaging system and includes a voice gateway server coupled to an electronic mail system and a private branch exchange (PBX). The voice gateway server provides voice messaging services to a set of subscribers. Within the voice gateway server, a ti-graph analyzer sequentially examines 3 character combinations; compares the occurrence frequencies with reference occurrence statistics modeled from text samples written in particular languages; and generates a language identifier;
and a likelihood value for the text message. Based upon the language identifiers a message inquiry unit selects an appropriate text-to-speech engine for converting the text message into computer-generated speech that is played to a subscriber.
While the present invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that various modifications can be provided.
For example, a language identification tool based upon techniques other than ngraph methods could be utilized instead of the trigraph analyzer 260 and associated corecurrence libraries 272, 273, 274, 275, 276. As another examples one or more text-to-speech engines 242, 243, 244, 245, 246 could be implemented via hardware,such as through "off board" text-to-speech engines accessed through the use of remote procedure calls. As yet another example, converted speech data or translated text data could be stored for future use, which could be useful in a store-once, multiple-playback environment. The description herein provides for these and other variations upon the present invention, which is limited only by the following claims.
Claims (25)
1. A method of operating language-based conversion of a present text message into speech, the method comprising the following steps:
a. retrieving the present text message;
b. automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the present text message, wherein the step of generating includes:
i. examining a sequence of characters of the present text message;
ii. determining an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within the sequence of characters of the present text message; and iii. matching the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations within the sequence of characters of the present text message with one of a plurality of corecurrence libraries;
c. converting the present text message directly into computer-generated speech in a language corresponding to the language identifier using a language-specific text-to-speech engine, wherein the language-specific text-to-speech engine is selected according to the language identifier; and d. playing the computer generated speech to a subscriber.
a. retrieving the present text message;
b. automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the present text message, wherein the step of generating includes:
i. examining a sequence of characters of the present text message;
ii. determining an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within the sequence of characters of the present text message; and iii. matching the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations within the sequence of characters of the present text message with one of a plurality of corecurrence libraries;
c. converting the present text message directly into computer-generated speech in a language corresponding to the language identifier using a language-specific text-to-speech engine, wherein the language-specific text-to-speech engine is selected according to the language identifier; and d. playing the computer generated speech to a subscriber.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of converting is performed by the language-specific text-to-speech engine utilizing a phoneme library.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the following steps:
a. sensing a subsequent text message; and b. repeating the steps of retrieving, generating, converting, and playing in response to the step of sensing.
a. sensing a subsequent text message; and b. repeating the steps of retrieving, generating, converting, and playing in response to the step of sensing.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of matching further comprises the steps of:
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a best match between the actual frequency of occurrence and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a best match between the actual frequency of occurrence and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of examining comprises using a trigraph analyzer for inspecting the character combinations and wherein the character combinations comprise three consecutive characters within the sequence of characters.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sequence of characters is found in a first portion of the present text message.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the step of matching further comprises the following steps:
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining that a sufficient number of matches exist between the actual frequency of occurrence and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining that a sufficient number of matches exist between the actual frequency of occurrence and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
8. The method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the step of matching is performed when there is the sufficient number of matches between the actual frequency of occurrence and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
9. The method as claimed in claim 7, further comprising the step of terminating the method when the sufficient number of matches does not exist.
10. A method of providing language-based conversion of an original text message into speech for a user comprising the following steps:
a. retrieving the original text message;
b. automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the original text message, wherein the step of generating includes:
i. examining a sequence of characters of the original text message;
ii. determining an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within the sequence of characters; and iii. matching the frequency of occurrence of the character combinations with one of a plurality of corecurrence libraries;
c. automatically selecting an appropriate one text translator from a plurality of text translators, wherein each of the plurality of translators corresponds to one of a plurality of languages and the appropriate one text translator is selected based upon the language identifier;
d. translating the original text message into a translated text message in a user selected language in response to the appropriate text translator;
e. converting the translated text message into computer generated speech based upon the user selected language; and f. playing the computer generated speech to the user.
a. retrieving the original text message;
b. automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the original text message, wherein the step of generating includes:
i. examining a sequence of characters of the original text message;
ii. determining an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within the sequence of characters; and iii. matching the frequency of occurrence of the character combinations with one of a plurality of corecurrence libraries;
c. automatically selecting an appropriate one text translator from a plurality of text translators, wherein each of the plurality of translators corresponds to one of a plurality of languages and the appropriate one text translator is selected based upon the language identifier;
d. translating the original text message into a translated text message in a user selected language in response to the appropriate text translator;
e. converting the translated text message into computer generated speech based upon the user selected language; and f. playing the computer generated speech to the user.
11. The method as claimed in claim 10, further comprising the following step:
a. polling the user for the user selected language.
a. polling the user for the user selected language.
12. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the step of matching further comprises the following steps:
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining that there is a sufficient number of matches between the actual frequency of occurrence and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining that there is a sufficient number of matches between the actual frequency of occurrence and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
13. The method as claimed in claim 10, wherein the step of matching further comprises the following steps:
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a best match between the actual frequency of occurrence and the plurality of reference frequencies.
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence with each of a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each of the plurality of reference frequencies corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a best match between the actual frequency of occurrence and the plurality of reference frequencies.
14. A messaging system for converting a text message into computer generated speech, the system comprising:
a. means for storing the text message;
b. means for automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the text message wherein the means for automatically generating is coupled to the means for storing, wherein the means for generating includes means for determining an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within a sequence of characters of the text message and means for comparing the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations within the sequence of characters with a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each reference frequency corresponds to a particular corecurrence library;
c. a plurality of text-to-speech engines coupled to the means for storing wherein each of the plurality of text-to-speech engines corresponds to one of a plurality of languages and an appropriate one text-to-speech engine based on the language identifier converts the text message into the computer generated speech; and d. means for playing the computer-generated speech to a subscriber.
a. means for storing the text message;
b. means for automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the text message wherein the means for automatically generating is coupled to the means for storing, wherein the means for generating includes means for determining an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within a sequence of characters of the text message and means for comparing the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations within the sequence of characters with a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each reference frequency corresponds to a particular corecurrence library;
c. a plurality of text-to-speech engines coupled to the means for storing wherein each of the plurality of text-to-speech engines corresponds to one of a plurality of languages and an appropriate one text-to-speech engine based on the language identifier converts the text message into the computer generated speech; and d. means for playing the computer-generated speech to a subscriber.
15. The system as claimed in claim 14 further comprises a phoneme library coupled to the text to speech engine for converting the text message into the computer generated speech.
16. The system as claimed in claim 14 wherein the means for automatically generating further comprises a trigraph analyzer to formulate an occurrence frequency of the text message based on examining a combination of three consecutive characters within the text message.
17. A voice messaging system for providing voice messaging services to a set of subscribers, the voice messaging system comprising:
a. means for retrieving a text message;
b. means for automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the text message, wherein the means for generating includes means for comparing an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within a sequence of characters of the text message with a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each reference frequency corresponds to a particular corecurrence library;
c. means for converting the text message directly into computer-generated speech, wherein the means for converting uses a language-specific text-to-speech engine that is selected based upon the language identifier; and d. means for playing the computer-generated speech to a subscriber.
a. means for retrieving a text message;
b. means for automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the text message, wherein the means for generating includes means for comparing an actual frequency of occurrence of character combinations within a sequence of characters of the text message with a plurality of reference frequencies wherein each reference frequency corresponds to a particular corecurrence library;
c. means for converting the text message directly into computer-generated speech, wherein the means for converting uses a language-specific text-to-speech engine that is selected based upon the language identifier; and d. means for playing the computer-generated speech to a subscriber.
18. The voice messaging system according to claim 17 further comprising a voice gateway server configured to be connected to a computer network and a Private Branch Exchange, wherein the voice gateway server facilitates the exchange of messages between the computer network and the Private Branch Exchange.
19. A method of operating language-based conversion of a present text message into speech, the method comprising the following steps:
a. retrieving the present text message;
b. automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the present text message, wherein the step of generating includes:
i. examining a sequence of characters of the present text message;
ii. determining an actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters within the present text message; and iii. matching the actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters with one of a plurality of corecurrence libraries, wherein each of the plurality of corecurrence libraries corresponds to a different language;
selecting an appropriate one text-to-speech engine from a plurality of text-to-speech engines wherein each of the plurality of text-to-speech engines corresponds to one of a plurality of languages and the appropriate one text-to-speech engine is selected based upon the language identifier;
d. converting the present text message directly into computer-generated speech in response to the appropriate text-to-speech engine; and e. playing the computer generated speech to a subscriber.
a. retrieving the present text message;
b. automatically generating a language identifier corresponding to the present text message, wherein the step of generating includes:
i. examining a sequence of characters of the present text message;
ii. determining an actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters within the present text message; and iii. matching the actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters with one of a plurality of corecurrence libraries, wherein each of the plurality of corecurrence libraries corresponds to a different language;
selecting an appropriate one text-to-speech engine from a plurality of text-to-speech engines wherein each of the plurality of text-to-speech engines corresponds to one of a plurality of languages and the appropriate one text-to-speech engine is selected based upon the language identifier;
d. converting the present text message directly into computer-generated speech in response to the appropriate text-to-speech engine; and e. playing the computer generated speech to a subscriber.
20. The method as claimed in claim 19 wherein the step of matching the actual frequency of occurrence includes:
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters within the present text message with a plurality of reference occurrence frequencies for the sequence of characters, wherein each reference occurrence frequency corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a closest match between the actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters and one of the reference occurrence frequencies.
a. comparing the actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters within the present text message with a plurality of reference occurrence frequencies for the sequence of characters, wherein each reference occurrence frequency corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a closest match between the actual frequency of occurrence of the sequence of characters and one of the reference occurrence frequencies.
21. The method as claimed in claim 19 wherein:
a. the step of examining the sequence of characters further comprises dividing the sequence of characters of the present text messages into a plurality of sequential character combinations;
b. the step of determining the actual frequency of occurrence further comprises determining a set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character combinations occur in the sequence of characters of the present text message; and c. the step of matching the actual frequency of occurrence further comprises matching the set of actual rates with one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries.
a. the step of examining the sequence of characters further comprises dividing the sequence of characters of the present text messages into a plurality of sequential character combinations;
b. the step of determining the actual frequency of occurrence further comprises determining a set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character combinations occur in the sequence of characters of the present text message; and c. the step of matching the actual frequency of occurrence further comprises matching the set of actual rates with one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries.
22. The method as claimed in claim 21 wherein the step of matching the set of actual rates includes:
a. comparing the set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character combinations occur in the sequence of characters of the present text message with a plurality of reference occurrence frequencies for the sequence of characters, wherein each reference occurrence frequency corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a closest match between the set of actual rates and one of the reference occurrence frequencies.
a. comparing the set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character combinations occur in the sequence of characters of the present text message with a plurality of reference occurrence frequencies for the sequence of characters, wherein each reference occurrence frequency corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. determining a closest match between the set of actual rates and one of the reference occurrence frequencies.
23. The system as claimed in claim 14 wherein the means for comparing the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations within the sequence of characters of the text message further comprises means for determining a closest match between the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations and one of the plurality of reference frequencies.
24. The messaging system as claimed in claim 14 wherein:
a. the means for determining the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations further comprises:
i. means for dividing the sequence of characters of the present text messages into a plurality of sequential character sets; and ii. means for determining the actual frequency of occurrence further comprises determining a set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character sets occur in the sequence of characters of the text message; and b. the means for comparing further comprises means for matching the set of actual rates with one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries.
a. the means for determining the actual frequency of occurrence of the character combinations further comprises:
i. means for dividing the sequence of characters of the present text messages into a plurality of sequential character sets; and ii. means for determining the actual frequency of occurrence further comprises determining a set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character sets occur in the sequence of characters of the text message; and b. the means for comparing further comprises means for matching the set of actual rates with one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries.
25. The messaging system as claimed in claim 24 wherein the means for matching the set of actual rates includes:
a. means for comparing the set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character sets occur in the sequence of characters of the text message with a plurality of reference occurrence frequencies for the sequence of characters, wherein each reference occurrence frequency corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. means for determining a closest match between the set of actual rates and one of the reference occurrence frequencies.
a. means for comparing the set of actual rates at which each of the plurality of sequential character sets occur in the sequence of characters of the text message with a plurality of reference occurrence frequencies for the sequence of characters, wherein each reference occurrence frequency corresponds to one of the plurality of corecurrence libraries; and b. means for determining a closest match between the set of actual rates and one of the reference occurrence frequencies.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US5172097P | 1997-07-03 | 1997-07-03 | |
| US60/051,720 | 1997-07-03 | ||
| US9974498A | 1998-06-18 | 1998-06-18 |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2242065A1 CA2242065A1 (en) | 1999-01-03 |
| CA2242065C true CA2242065C (en) | 2004-12-14 |
Family
ID=26729758
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002242065A Expired - Fee Related CA2242065C (en) | 1997-07-03 | 1998-06-25 | Unified messaging system with automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (2) | US6477494B2 (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0889628A3 (en) |
| JP (1) | JPH11149474A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2242065C (en) |
Families Citing this family (223)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US8321411B2 (en) | 1999-03-23 | 2012-11-27 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for management of an automatic OLAP report broadcast system |
| US8607138B2 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2013-12-10 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for OLAP report generation with spreadsheet report within the network user interface |
| US9208213B2 (en) | 1999-05-28 | 2015-12-08 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for network user interface OLAP report formatting |
| WO2001006489A1 (en) * | 1999-07-21 | 2001-01-25 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Improved text to speech conversion |
| US6850603B1 (en) * | 1999-09-13 | 2005-02-01 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized dynamic and interactive voice services |
| US8130918B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2012-03-06 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, with closed loop transaction processing |
| US6964012B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2005-11-08 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, including deployment through personalized broadcasts |
| US6829334B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-12-07 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for the creation and automatic deployment of personalized, dynamic and interactive voice services, with telephone-based service utilization and control |
| US6873693B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2005-03-29 | Microstrategy, Incorporated | System and method for real-time, personalized, dynamic, interactive voice services for entertainment-related information |
| US6836537B1 (en) | 1999-09-13 | 2004-12-28 | Microstrategy Incorporated | System and method for real-time, personalized, dynamic, interactive voice services for information related to existing travel schedule |
| US7165019B1 (en) * | 1999-11-05 | 2007-01-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Language input architecture for converting one text form to another text form with modeless entry |
| US6848080B1 (en) | 1999-11-05 | 2005-01-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Language input architecture for converting one text form to another text form with tolerance to spelling, typographical, and conversion errors |
| US7403888B1 (en) | 1999-11-05 | 2008-07-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Language input user interface |
| US20030028380A1 (en) * | 2000-02-02 | 2003-02-06 | Freeland Warwick Peter | Speech system |
| GB0004097D0 (en) * | 2000-02-22 | 2000-04-12 | Ibm | Management of speech technology modules in an interactive voice response system |
| US6498835B1 (en) * | 2000-02-29 | 2002-12-24 | Ameritech Corporation | Method and system for providing visual notification in a unified messaging system |
| US8645137B2 (en) | 2000-03-16 | 2014-02-04 | Apple Inc. | Fast, language-independent method for user authentication by voice |
| US7047493B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2006-05-16 | Brill Eric D | Spell checker with arbitrary length string-to-string transformations to improve noisy channel spelling correction |
| US6778961B2 (en) * | 2000-05-17 | 2004-08-17 | Wconect, Llc | Method and system for delivering text-to-speech in a real time telephony environment |
| US6957184B2 (en) * | 2000-07-20 | 2005-10-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Context free grammar engine for speech recognition system |
| US6931376B2 (en) * | 2000-07-20 | 2005-08-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Speech-related event notification system |
| US7139709B2 (en) * | 2000-07-20 | 2006-11-21 | Microsoft Corporation | Middleware layer between speech related applications and engines |
| US20020019851A1 (en) * | 2000-07-26 | 2002-02-14 | Jordan Pollack | System and method for the electronic mail based management and manipulation of stored files |
| US7116764B1 (en) * | 2000-08-11 | 2006-10-03 | Unisys Corporation | Network interface unit having an embedded services processor |
| JP2002149560A (en) * | 2000-08-28 | 2002-05-24 | Sharp Corp | Device and system for e-mail |
| GB2366940B (en) | 2000-09-06 | 2004-08-11 | Ericsson Telefon Ab L M | Text language detection |
| US6661877B1 (en) * | 2000-09-29 | 2003-12-09 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for providing access to a unified message store logically storing computer telephony messages |
| US6845250B1 (en) | 2000-10-13 | 2005-01-18 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and system for transmitting messages in a communications network |
| US8406791B1 (en) * | 2000-10-17 | 2013-03-26 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | Audio on location |
| US8479189B2 (en) | 2000-11-17 | 2013-07-02 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Pattern detection preprocessor in an electronic device update generation system |
| US7409685B2 (en) | 2002-04-12 | 2008-08-05 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Initialization and update of software and/or firmware in electronic devices |
| US7451075B2 (en) * | 2000-12-29 | 2008-11-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Compressed speech lexicon and method and apparatus for creating and accessing the speech lexicon |
| KR100365340B1 (en) * | 2001-01-12 | 2002-12-18 | 삼성전자 주식회사 | Announcement broadcast apparatus in the system of umts |
| US7062437B2 (en) * | 2001-02-13 | 2006-06-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Audio renderings for expressing non-audio nuances |
| US7003083B2 (en) * | 2001-02-13 | 2006-02-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | Selectable audio and mixed background sound for voice messaging system |
| JP2002297508A (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-11 | Fujitsu Ltd | Information processing system, control device, recording medium, and program |
| US7110525B1 (en) | 2001-06-25 | 2006-09-19 | Toby Heller | Agent training sensitive call routing system |
| CN1552151A (en) * | 2001-07-27 | 2004-12-01 | 阿尔卡特互联网运行公司 | Policy based PC-to-phone text messaging for enterprise networks |
| US20040030554A1 (en) * | 2002-01-09 | 2004-02-12 | Samya Boxberger-Oberoi | System and method for providing locale-specific interpretation of text data |
| GB0204246D0 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2002-04-10 | Mitel Knowledge Corp | System and method for message language translation |
| US7372952B1 (en) | 2002-03-07 | 2008-05-13 | Wai Wu | Telephony control system with intelligent call routing |
| US20030179863A1 (en) * | 2002-03-19 | 2003-09-25 | Brainoxygen, Inc | Multiplatform synthesized voice message system |
| US7230745B1 (en) * | 2002-04-08 | 2007-06-12 | Captaris, Inc. | Document transmission and routing with recipient control, such as facsimile document transmission and routing |
| US7103551B2 (en) * | 2002-05-02 | 2006-09-05 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer network including a computer system transmitting screen image information and corresponding speech information to another computer system |
| US7233786B1 (en) | 2002-08-06 | 2007-06-19 | Captaris, Inc. | Providing access to information of multiple types via coordination of distinct information services |
| US7539291B2 (en) | 2002-10-16 | 2009-05-26 | J2 Global Communications | Enhancing messaging services using translation gateways |
| US20040078191A1 (en) * | 2002-10-22 | 2004-04-22 | Nokia Corporation | Scalable neural network-based language identification from written text |
| FR2848688A1 (en) * | 2002-12-17 | 2004-06-18 | France Telecom | Text language identifying device for linguistic analysis of text, has analyzing unit to analyze chain characters of words extracted from one text, where each chain is completed so that each time chains are found in word |
| US9818136B1 (en) | 2003-02-05 | 2017-11-14 | Steven M. Hoffberg | System and method for determining contingent relevance |
| US8392173B2 (en) * | 2003-02-10 | 2013-03-05 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Message translations |
| US7676034B1 (en) | 2003-03-07 | 2010-03-09 | Wai Wu | Method and system for matching entities in an auction |
| US20040230659A1 (en) * | 2003-03-12 | 2004-11-18 | Chase Michael John | Systems and methods of media messaging |
| US8582764B2 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2013-11-12 | The Western Union Company | Device and method for concealing customer information from a customer service representative |
| US6914964B1 (en) | 2003-04-01 | 2005-07-05 | Richard C. Levine | System and method for establishing automatic multipoint network connections in a communications environment |
| US8005677B2 (en) * | 2003-05-09 | 2011-08-23 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Source-dependent text-to-speech system |
| GB2402855A (en) * | 2003-06-12 | 2004-12-15 | Seiko Epson Corp | Multiple language text to speech processing |
| US7308082B2 (en) * | 2003-07-24 | 2007-12-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method to enable instant collaboration via use of pervasive messaging |
| JP2005080095A (en) * | 2003-09-02 | 2005-03-24 | Canon Inc | Communication terminal and its transfer method |
| US8555273B1 (en) | 2003-09-17 | 2013-10-08 | Palm. Inc. | Network for updating electronic devices |
| US20050060156A1 (en) * | 2003-09-17 | 2005-03-17 | Corrigan Gerald E. | Speech synthesis |
| US7260393B2 (en) * | 2003-09-23 | 2007-08-21 | Intel Corporation | Systems and methods for reducing communication unit scan time in wireless networks |
| US7805307B2 (en) | 2003-09-30 | 2010-09-28 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | Text to speech conversion system |
| US20050144003A1 (en) * | 2003-12-08 | 2005-06-30 | Nokia Corporation | Multi-lingual speech synthesis |
| US7904895B1 (en) | 2004-04-21 | 2011-03-08 | Hewlett-Packard Develpment Company, L.P. | Firmware update in electronic devices employing update agent in a flash memory card |
| US8526940B1 (en) | 2004-08-17 | 2013-09-03 | Palm, Inc. | Centralized rules repository for smart phone customer care |
| JP2006155482A (en) * | 2004-12-01 | 2006-06-15 | Nec Corp | Portable communication terminal device, content output method, distribution server and method therefor, and content provision system and provision method therefor |
| EP1727024A1 (en) * | 2005-05-27 | 2006-11-29 | Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB | Automatic language selection for text input in messaging context |
| JP4170325B2 (en) * | 2005-08-05 | 2008-10-22 | インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション | Apparatus, method and program for evaluating validity of dictionary |
| US8677377B2 (en) | 2005-09-08 | 2014-03-18 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for building an intelligent automated assistant |
| US8077838B2 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2011-12-13 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and voice communicator to provide a voice communication |
| US8874477B2 (en) | 2005-10-04 | 2014-10-28 | Steven Mark Hoffberg | Multifactorial optimization system and method |
| CA2628096C (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2011-07-26 | Captaris, Inc. | Universal document transport |
| US20070177195A1 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2007-08-02 | Treber Rebert | Queue processor for document servers |
| KR100735261B1 (en) * | 2005-12-26 | 2007-07-03 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Wireless terminal and a method for outputting voice data using that |
| US20070156682A1 (en) * | 2005-12-28 | 2007-07-05 | Microsoft Corporation | Personalized user specific files for object recognition |
| JP5011751B2 (en) * | 2006-02-27 | 2012-08-29 | 富士通株式会社 | Translation information output processing program, processing method, and processing apparatus |
| US8300798B1 (en) | 2006-04-03 | 2012-10-30 | Wai Wu | Intelligent communication routing system and method |
| US8209676B2 (en) * | 2006-06-08 | 2012-06-26 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Device management in a network |
| WO2008014454A2 (en) | 2006-07-27 | 2008-01-31 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | User experience and dependency management in a mobile device |
| CA2659607C (en) | 2006-08-02 | 2017-12-05 | Captaris, Inc. | Configurable document server |
| US8510113B1 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2013-08-13 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and system for enhancing a speech database |
| US8510112B1 (en) * | 2006-08-31 | 2013-08-13 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and system for enhancing a speech database |
| US7912718B1 (en) | 2006-08-31 | 2011-03-22 | At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P. | Method and system for enhancing a speech database |
| US9318108B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2016-04-19 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant |
| EP1901534B1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2010-09-01 | LG Electronics Inc. | Method of managing a language information for a text input and method of inputting a text and a mobile terminal |
| JP2008077601A (en) * | 2006-09-25 | 2008-04-03 | Toshiba Corp | Machine translation device, machine translation method and machine translation program |
| US8144842B2 (en) * | 2006-12-08 | 2012-03-27 | Microsoft Corporation | Unified messaging gateway device for providing operation during a network failure |
| US8977255B2 (en) | 2007-04-03 | 2015-03-10 | Apple Inc. | Method and system for operating a multi-function portable electronic device using voice-activation |
| US20090128861A1 (en) * | 2007-09-09 | 2009-05-21 | Xpedite Systems, Llc | Systems and Methods for Communicating Multimodal Messages |
| US9330720B2 (en) | 2008-01-03 | 2016-05-03 | Apple Inc. | Methods and apparatus for altering audio output signals |
| US10003701B2 (en) | 2008-01-30 | 2018-06-19 | Xpedite Systems, Llc | Systems and methods for generating and communicating enhanced portable document format files |
| US8996376B2 (en) | 2008-04-05 | 2015-03-31 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent text-to-speech conversion |
| US20090254621A1 (en) * | 2008-04-08 | 2009-10-08 | Venali, Inc. | Peer-to-peer messaging of facsimile messages |
| US10496753B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2019-12-03 | Apple Inc. | Automatically adapting user interfaces for hands-free interaction |
| US20100030549A1 (en) | 2008-07-31 | 2010-02-04 | Lee Michael M | Mobile device having human language translation capability with positional feedback |
| US8224641B2 (en) | 2008-11-19 | 2012-07-17 | Stratify, Inc. | Language identification for documents containing multiple languages |
| US8224642B2 (en) | 2008-11-20 | 2012-07-17 | Stratify, Inc. | Automated identification of documents as not belonging to any language |
| US9959870B2 (en) | 2008-12-11 | 2018-05-01 | Apple Inc. | Speech recognition involving a mobile device |
| US8380507B2 (en) | 2009-03-09 | 2013-02-19 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for determining the language to use for speech generated by a text to speech engine |
| US10241644B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2019-03-26 | Apple Inc. | Actionable reminder entries |
| US10255566B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2019-04-09 | Apple Inc. | Generating and processing task items that represent tasks to perform |
| US10241752B2 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2019-03-26 | Apple Inc. | Interface for a virtual digital assistant |
| US9858925B2 (en) | 2009-06-05 | 2018-01-02 | Apple Inc. | Using context information to facilitate processing of commands in a virtual assistant |
| US9431006B2 (en) | 2009-07-02 | 2016-08-30 | Apple Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for automatic speech recognition |
| US8190420B2 (en) * | 2009-08-04 | 2012-05-29 | Autonomy Corporation Ltd. | Automatic spoken language identification based on phoneme sequence patterns |
| US10276170B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2019-04-30 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant |
| US10705794B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2020-07-07 | Apple Inc. | Automatically adapting user interfaces for hands-free interaction |
| US10679605B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2020-06-09 | Apple Inc. | Hands-free list-reading by intelligent automated assistant |
| US10553209B2 (en) | 2010-01-18 | 2020-02-04 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for hands-free notification summaries |
| DE202011111062U1 (en) | 2010-01-25 | 2019-02-19 | Newvaluexchange Ltd. | Device and system for a digital conversation management platform |
| US8682667B2 (en) | 2010-02-25 | 2014-03-25 | Apple Inc. | User profiling for selecting user specific voice input processing information |
| US8423352B2 (en) * | 2010-04-06 | 2013-04-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Enhancing language detection in short communications |
| EP2424205B1 (en) * | 2010-08-26 | 2019-03-13 | Unify GmbH & Co. KG | Method and system for automatic transfer of status information |
| US10762293B2 (en) | 2010-12-22 | 2020-09-01 | Apple Inc. | Using parts-of-speech tagging and named entity recognition for spelling correction |
| JP2012190314A (en) * | 2011-03-11 | 2012-10-04 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Image processing device and program |
| US9262612B2 (en) | 2011-03-21 | 2016-02-16 | Apple Inc. | Device access using voice authentication |
| US20120259633A1 (en) * | 2011-04-07 | 2012-10-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Audio-interactive message exchange |
| US10057736B2 (en) | 2011-06-03 | 2018-08-21 | Apple Inc. | Active transport based notifications |
| US8994660B2 (en) | 2011-08-29 | 2015-03-31 | Apple Inc. | Text correction processing |
| US10134385B2 (en) | 2012-03-02 | 2018-11-20 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for name pronunciation |
| US9483461B2 (en) | 2012-03-06 | 2016-11-01 | Apple Inc. | Handling speech synthesis of content for multiple languages |
| US9280610B2 (en) | 2012-05-14 | 2016-03-08 | Apple Inc. | Crowd sourcing information to fulfill user requests |
| US9721563B2 (en) | 2012-06-08 | 2017-08-01 | Apple Inc. | Name recognition system |
| US9495129B2 (en) | 2012-06-29 | 2016-11-15 | Apple Inc. | Device, method, and user interface for voice-activated navigation and browsing of a document |
| US9576574B2 (en) | 2012-09-10 | 2017-02-21 | Apple Inc. | Context-sensitive handling of interruptions by intelligent digital assistant |
| US8671149B1 (en) | 2012-09-18 | 2014-03-11 | Weerawan Wongmanee | Unified messaging platform with intelligent voice recognition (IVR) |
| US8706912B2 (en) | 2012-09-18 | 2014-04-22 | Weerawan Wongmanee | Unified LTE cloud system |
| US8428228B1 (en) | 2012-09-18 | 2013-04-23 | Weerawan Wongmanee | Unified communication system |
| US9547647B2 (en) | 2012-09-19 | 2017-01-17 | Apple Inc. | Voice-based media searching |
| US20140108002A1 (en) * | 2012-10-17 | 2014-04-17 | Research In Motion Limited | Method and system for updating display information based on detected language of a received message |
| KR20230137475A (en) | 2013-02-07 | 2023-10-04 | 애플 인크. | Voice trigger for a digital assistant |
| US9368114B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2016-06-14 | Apple Inc. | Context-sensitive handling of interruptions |
| WO2014144579A1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2014-09-18 | Apple Inc. | System and method for updating an adaptive speech recognition model |
| AU2014233517B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-05-25 | Apple Inc. | Training an at least partial voice command system |
| WO2014197336A1 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2014-12-11 | Apple Inc. | System and method for detecting errors in interactions with a voice-based digital assistant |
| US9582608B2 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2017-02-28 | Apple Inc. | Unified ranking with entropy-weighted information for phrase-based semantic auto-completion |
| WO2014197334A2 (en) | 2013-06-07 | 2014-12-11 | Apple Inc. | System and method for user-specified pronunciation of words for speech synthesis and recognition |
| WO2014197335A1 (en) | 2013-06-08 | 2014-12-11 | Apple Inc. | Interpreting and acting upon commands that involve sharing information with remote devices |
| US10176167B2 (en) | 2013-06-09 | 2019-01-08 | Apple Inc. | System and method for inferring user intent from speech inputs |
| EP3937002A1 (en) | 2013-06-09 | 2022-01-12 | Apple Inc. | Device, method, and graphical user interface for enabling conversation persistence across two or more instances of a digital assistant |
| AU2014278595B2 (en) | 2013-06-13 | 2017-04-06 | Apple Inc. | System and method for emergency calls initiated by voice command |
| US20150012259A1 (en) * | 2013-07-02 | 2015-01-08 | Sap Ag | Language translator module in the middleware tool process integration |
| DE112014003653B4 (en) | 2013-08-06 | 2024-04-18 | Apple Inc. | Automatically activate intelligent responses based on activities from remote devices |
| US9431002B2 (en) | 2014-03-04 | 2016-08-30 | Tribune Digital Ventures, Llc | Real time popularity based audible content aquisition |
| US9620105B2 (en) | 2014-05-15 | 2017-04-11 | Apple Inc. | Analyzing audio input for efficient speech and music recognition |
| US10592095B2 (en) | 2014-05-23 | 2020-03-17 | Apple Inc. | Instantaneous speaking of content on touch devices |
| US9502031B2 (en) | 2014-05-27 | 2016-11-22 | Apple Inc. | Method for supporting dynamic grammars in WFST-based ASR |
| US9842101B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-12-12 | Apple Inc. | Predictive conversion of language input |
| US9785630B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-10-10 | Apple Inc. | Text prediction using combined word N-gram and unigram language models |
| US10170123B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2019-01-01 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent assistant for home automation |
| US9734193B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-08-15 | Apple Inc. | Determining domain salience ranking from ambiguous words in natural speech |
| AU2015266863B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2018-03-15 | Apple Inc. | Multi-command single utterance input method |
| US10289433B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2019-05-14 | Apple Inc. | Domain specific language for encoding assistant dialog |
| US9430463B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2016-08-30 | Apple Inc. | Exemplar-based natural language processing |
| US9760559B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-09-12 | Apple Inc. | Predictive text input |
| US9633004B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-04-25 | Apple Inc. | Better resolution when referencing to concepts |
| US10078631B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2018-09-18 | Apple Inc. | Entropy-guided text prediction using combined word and character n-gram language models |
| US9715875B2 (en) | 2014-05-30 | 2017-07-25 | Apple Inc. | Reducing the need for manual start/end-pointing and trigger phrases |
| US9338493B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2016-05-10 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant for TV user interactions |
| US10659851B2 (en) | 2014-06-30 | 2020-05-19 | Apple Inc. | Real-time digital assistant knowledge updates |
| US10446141B2 (en) | 2014-08-28 | 2019-10-15 | Apple Inc. | Automatic speech recognition based on user feedback |
| US9818400B2 (en) | 2014-09-11 | 2017-11-14 | Apple Inc. | Method and apparatus for discovering trending terms in speech requests |
| US10789041B2 (en) | 2014-09-12 | 2020-09-29 | Apple Inc. | Dynamic thresholds for always listening speech trigger |
| US9606986B2 (en) | 2014-09-29 | 2017-03-28 | Apple Inc. | Integrated word N-gram and class M-gram language models |
| US9886432B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2018-02-06 | Apple Inc. | Parsimonious handling of word inflection via categorical stem + suffix N-gram language models |
| US9668121B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2017-05-30 | Apple Inc. | Social reminders |
| US9646609B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2017-05-09 | Apple Inc. | Caching apparatus for serving phonetic pronunciations |
| US10074360B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2018-09-11 | Apple Inc. | Providing an indication of the suitability of speech recognition |
| US10127911B2 (en) | 2014-09-30 | 2018-11-13 | Apple Inc. | Speaker identification and unsupervised speaker adaptation techniques |
| US10552013B2 (en) | 2014-12-02 | 2020-02-04 | Apple Inc. | Data detection |
| US9711141B2 (en) | 2014-12-09 | 2017-07-18 | Apple Inc. | Disambiguating heteronyms in speech synthesis |
| US9865280B2 (en) | 2015-03-06 | 2018-01-09 | Apple Inc. | Structured dictation using intelligent automated assistants |
| US10567477B2 (en) | 2015-03-08 | 2020-02-18 | Apple Inc. | Virtual assistant continuity |
| US9886953B2 (en) | 2015-03-08 | 2018-02-06 | Apple Inc. | Virtual assistant activation |
| US9721566B2 (en) | 2015-03-08 | 2017-08-01 | Apple Inc. | Competing devices responding to voice triggers |
| US9899019B2 (en) | 2015-03-18 | 2018-02-20 | Apple Inc. | Systems and methods for structured stem and suffix language models |
| US9842105B2 (en) | 2015-04-16 | 2017-12-12 | Apple Inc. | Parsimonious continuous-space phrase representations for natural language processing |
| US10083688B2 (en) | 2015-05-27 | 2018-09-25 | Apple Inc. | Device voice control for selecting a displayed affordance |
| US10127220B2 (en) | 2015-06-04 | 2018-11-13 | Apple Inc. | Language identification from short strings |
| US9578173B2 (en) | 2015-06-05 | 2017-02-21 | Apple Inc. | Virtual assistant aided communication with 3rd party service in a communication session |
| US10101822B2 (en) | 2015-06-05 | 2018-10-16 | Apple Inc. | Language input correction |
| US11025565B2 (en) | 2015-06-07 | 2021-06-01 | Apple Inc. | Personalized prediction of responses for instant messaging |
| US10255907B2 (en) | 2015-06-07 | 2019-04-09 | Apple Inc. | Automatic accent detection using acoustic models |
| US10186254B2 (en) | 2015-06-07 | 2019-01-22 | Apple Inc. | Context-based endpoint detection |
| US10747498B2 (en) | 2015-09-08 | 2020-08-18 | Apple Inc. | Zero latency digital assistant |
| US10671428B2 (en) | 2015-09-08 | 2020-06-02 | Apple Inc. | Distributed personal assistant |
| US9697820B2 (en) | 2015-09-24 | 2017-07-04 | Apple Inc. | Unit-selection text-to-speech synthesis using concatenation-sensitive neural networks |
| US10366158B2 (en) | 2015-09-29 | 2019-07-30 | Apple Inc. | Efficient word encoding for recurrent neural network language models |
| US11010550B2 (en) | 2015-09-29 | 2021-05-18 | Apple Inc. | Unified language modeling framework for word prediction, auto-completion and auto-correction |
| US11587559B2 (en) | 2015-09-30 | 2023-02-21 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent device identification |
| US10691473B2 (en) | 2015-11-06 | 2020-06-23 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant in a messaging environment |
| US10049668B2 (en) | 2015-12-02 | 2018-08-14 | Apple Inc. | Applying neural network language models to weighted finite state transducers for automatic speech recognition |
| US10223066B2 (en) | 2015-12-23 | 2019-03-05 | Apple Inc. | Proactive assistance based on dialog communication between devices |
| US10261963B2 (en) | 2016-01-04 | 2019-04-16 | Gracenote, Inc. | Generating and distributing playlists with related music and stories |
| US10446143B2 (en) | 2016-03-14 | 2019-10-15 | Apple Inc. | Identification of voice inputs providing credentials |
| US9934775B2 (en) | 2016-05-26 | 2018-04-03 | Apple Inc. | Unit-selection text-to-speech synthesis based on predicted concatenation parameters |
| US9972304B2 (en) | 2016-06-03 | 2018-05-15 | Apple Inc. | Privacy preserving distributed evaluation framework for embedded personalized systems |
| US10249300B2 (en) | 2016-06-06 | 2019-04-02 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent list reading |
| US10049663B2 (en) | 2016-06-08 | 2018-08-14 | Apple, Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant for media exploration |
| DK179588B1 (en) | 2016-06-09 | 2019-02-22 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant in a home environment |
| US10192552B2 (en) | 2016-06-10 | 2019-01-29 | Apple Inc. | Digital assistant providing whispered speech |
| US10067938B2 (en) | 2016-06-10 | 2018-09-04 | Apple Inc. | Multilingual word prediction |
| US10509862B2 (en) | 2016-06-10 | 2019-12-17 | Apple Inc. | Dynamic phrase expansion of language input |
| US10586535B2 (en) | 2016-06-10 | 2020-03-10 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent digital assistant in a multi-tasking environment |
| US10490187B2 (en) | 2016-06-10 | 2019-11-26 | Apple Inc. | Digital assistant providing automated status report |
| DK179415B1 (en) | 2016-06-11 | 2018-06-14 | Apple Inc | Intelligent device arbitration and control |
| DK179343B1 (en) | 2016-06-11 | 2018-05-14 | Apple Inc | Intelligent task discovery |
| DK201670540A1 (en) | 2016-06-11 | 2018-01-08 | Apple Inc | Application integration with a digital assistant |
| DK179049B1 (en) | 2016-06-11 | 2017-09-18 | Apple Inc | Data driven natural language event detection and classification |
| CN110073437A (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2019-07-30 | 欧斯拉布斯私人有限公司 | A kind of system and method for text data to be converted to multiple voice data |
| US10043516B2 (en) | 2016-09-23 | 2018-08-07 | Apple Inc. | Intelligent automated assistant |
| US10419508B1 (en) | 2016-12-21 | 2019-09-17 | Gracenote Digital Ventures, Llc | Saving media for in-automobile playout |
| US10565980B1 (en) * | 2016-12-21 | 2020-02-18 | Gracenote Digital Ventures, Llc | Audio streaming of text-based articles from newsfeeds |
| US10019225B1 (en) | 2016-12-21 | 2018-07-10 | Gracenote Digital Ventures, Llc | Audio streaming based on in-automobile detection |
| US10593346B2 (en) | 2016-12-22 | 2020-03-17 | Apple Inc. | Rank-reduced token representation for automatic speech recognition |
| DK201770439A1 (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2018-12-13 | Apple Inc. | Offline personal assistant |
| DK179496B1 (en) | 2017-05-12 | 2019-01-15 | Apple Inc. | USER-SPECIFIC Acoustic Models |
| DK179745B1 (en) | 2017-05-12 | 2019-05-01 | Apple Inc. | SYNCHRONIZATION AND TASK DELEGATION OF A DIGITAL ASSISTANT |
| DK201770431A1 (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2018-12-20 | Apple Inc. | Optimizing dialogue policy decisions for digital assistants using implicit feedback |
| DK201770432A1 (en) | 2017-05-15 | 2018-12-21 | Apple Inc. | Hierarchical belief states for digital assistants |
| DK179560B1 (en) | 2017-05-16 | 2019-02-18 | Apple Inc. | Far-field extension for digital assistant services |
| US11404057B2 (en) * | 2018-02-23 | 2022-08-02 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Adaptive interactive voice response system |
| CN113138703B (en) * | 2021-05-20 | 2022-04-26 | 东方观丰(北京)科技有限公司 | Intelligent terminal dictionary quick query system and intelligent terminal |
Family Cites Families (46)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4829580A (en) * | 1986-03-26 | 1989-05-09 | Telephone And Telegraph Company, At&T Bell Laboratories | Text analysis system with letter sequence recognition and speech stress assignment arrangement |
| US4837798A (en) * | 1986-06-02 | 1989-06-06 | American Telephone And Telegraph Company | Communication system having unified messaging |
| US5765131A (en) | 1986-10-03 | 1998-06-09 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Language translation system and method |
| US5384701A (en) * | 1986-10-03 | 1995-01-24 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Language translation system |
| JPS6471254A (en) * | 1987-09-11 | 1989-03-16 | Hashimoto Corp | Automatic answering telephone system |
| EP0372734B1 (en) | 1988-11-23 | 1994-03-09 | Digital Equipment Corporation | Name pronunciation by synthesizer |
| US4935954A (en) | 1988-12-28 | 1990-06-19 | At&T Company | Automated message retrieval system |
| US5062143A (en) * | 1990-02-23 | 1991-10-29 | Harris Corporation | Trigram-based method of language identification |
| US5204894A (en) | 1990-11-09 | 1993-04-20 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Personal electronic directory |
| US5530740A (en) * | 1991-10-28 | 1996-06-25 | Contigram Communications Corporation | System and method for integrating voice, facsimile and electronic mail data through a personal computer |
| US5737395A (en) * | 1991-10-28 | 1998-04-07 | Centigram Communications Corporation | System and method for integrating voice, facsimile and electronic mail data through a personal computer |
| US5375164A (en) | 1992-05-26 | 1994-12-20 | At&T Corp. | Multiple language capability in an interactive system |
| GB9220404D0 (en) | 1992-08-20 | 1992-11-11 | Nat Security Agency | Method of identifying,retrieving and sorting documents |
| US5717738A (en) | 1993-01-11 | 1998-02-10 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and device for generating user defined spoken speed dial directories |
| US5479411A (en) | 1993-03-10 | 1995-12-26 | At&T Corp. | Multi-media integrated message arrangement |
| US5452340A (en) | 1993-04-01 | 1995-09-19 | Us West Advanced Technologies, Inc. | Method of voice activated telephone dialing |
| CA2116600C (en) * | 1993-04-10 | 1996-11-05 | David Jack Ittner | Methods and apparatus for inferring orientation of lines of text |
| DE69400115T2 (en) | 1993-06-22 | 1996-11-14 | Vmx Inc | Electronic messaging system with integrated voice messages |
| US5524137A (en) * | 1993-10-04 | 1996-06-04 | At&T Corp. | Multi-media messaging system |
| DE4436175B4 (en) * | 1993-10-12 | 2005-02-24 | Intel Corporation, Santa Clara | Device for remote access to a computer from a telephone handset |
| US5475738A (en) * | 1993-10-21 | 1995-12-12 | At&T Corp. | Interface between text and voice messaging systems |
| US5475733A (en) | 1993-11-04 | 1995-12-12 | At&T Corp. | Language accommodated message relaying for hearing impaired callers |
| US5493608A (en) | 1994-03-17 | 1996-02-20 | Alpha Logic, Incorporated | Caller adaptive voice response system |
| WO1995027360A1 (en) | 1994-03-31 | 1995-10-12 | Citibank, N.A. | Interactive voice response system |
| US5615301A (en) * | 1994-09-28 | 1997-03-25 | Rivers; W. L. | Automated language translation system |
| JP3034773B2 (en) | 1994-12-27 | 2000-04-17 | シャープ株式会社 | Electronic interpreter |
| US5715466A (en) * | 1995-02-14 | 1998-02-03 | Compuserve Incorporated | System for parallel foreign language communication over a computer network |
| EP0786132B1 (en) | 1995-08-14 | 2000-04-26 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | A method and device for preparing and using diphones for multilingual text-to-speech generating |
| US5875232A (en) | 1995-09-29 | 1999-02-23 | Ast Research, Inc. | Personalized voice mail identification system |
| US5771273A (en) * | 1996-02-05 | 1998-06-23 | Bell Atlantic Network Services, Inc. | Network accessed personal secretary |
| US5797124A (en) | 1996-05-30 | 1998-08-18 | Intervoice Limited Partnership | Voice-controlled voice mail having random-order message retrieval based on played spoken identifier list |
| US5712901A (en) * | 1996-06-26 | 1998-01-27 | Mci Communications Corporation | Automatic voice/text translation of phone mail messages |
| JPH1031869A (en) * | 1996-07-16 | 1998-02-03 | Pioneer Electron Corp | Reproducing device |
| US6292782B1 (en) | 1996-09-09 | 2001-09-18 | Philips Electronics North America Corp. | Speech recognition and verification system enabling authorized data transmission over networked computer systems |
| US6002998A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-12-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fast, efficient hardware mechanism for natural language determination |
| US6085162A (en) * | 1996-10-18 | 2000-07-04 | Gedanken Corporation | Translation system and method in which words are translated by a specialized dictionary and then a general dictionary |
| US5999611A (en) | 1996-11-19 | 1999-12-07 | Stentor Resource Centre Inc. | Subscriber interface for accessing and operating personal communication services |
| US5991365A (en) * | 1997-03-12 | 1999-11-23 | Siemens Corporate Research, Inc. | Remote phone-based access to a universal multimedia mailbox |
| US5870454A (en) | 1997-04-01 | 1999-02-09 | Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson | Telecommunications speech/text conversion and message delivery system |
| US5943398A (en) * | 1997-04-02 | 1999-08-24 | Lucent Technologies Inc. | Automated message-translation arrangement |
| US5987100A (en) * | 1997-04-23 | 1999-11-16 | Northern Telecom Limited | Universal mailbox |
| EP0889626A1 (en) * | 1997-07-04 | 1999-01-07 | Octel Communications Corporation | Unified messaging system with automatic language identifacation for text-to-speech conversion |
| US6061718A (en) * | 1997-07-23 | 2000-05-09 | Ericsson Inc. | Electronic mail delivery system in wired or wireless communications system |
| US6215859B1 (en) | 1997-10-02 | 2001-04-10 | At&T Corp. | Delivery of urgent messages by integrated forced delivery and voice mailbox |
| KR100238189B1 (en) * | 1997-10-16 | 2000-01-15 | 윤종용 | Multi-language tts device and method |
| JP3711411B2 (en) * | 1999-04-19 | 2005-11-02 | 沖電気工業株式会社 | Speech synthesizer |
-
1998
- 1998-06-25 CA CA002242065A patent/CA2242065C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-06-29 EP EP98111992A patent/EP0889628A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1998-07-03 JP JP10204412A patent/JPH11149474A/en active Pending
-
2000
- 2000-01-07 US US09/479,333 patent/US6477494B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2000-01-10 US US09/480,296 patent/US6487533B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| EP0889628A2 (en) | 1999-01-07 |
| EP0889628A3 (en) | 2002-10-02 |
| US20020069062A1 (en) | 2002-06-06 |
| US6487533B2 (en) | 2002-11-26 |
| US20010056348A1 (en) | 2001-12-27 |
| US6477494B2 (en) | 2002-11-05 |
| JPH11149474A (en) | 1999-06-02 |
| CA2242065A1 (en) | 1999-01-03 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2242065C (en) | Unified messaging system with automatic language identification for text-to-speech conversion | |
| EP0889626A1 (en) | Unified messaging system with automatic language identifacation for text-to-speech conversion | |
| EP1204964B1 (en) | Improved text to speech conversion | |
| US9350862B2 (en) | System and method for processing speech | |
| US6243681B1 (en) | Multiple language speech synthesizer | |
| US6366882B1 (en) | Apparatus for converting speech to text | |
| US6775360B2 (en) | Method and system for providing textual content along with voice messages | |
| US6651042B1 (en) | System and method for automatic voice message processing | |
| EP1014277A1 (en) | Communication system and method employing automatic language identification | |
| JP4089148B2 (en) | Interpreting service method and interpreting service device | |
| US20030171926A1 (en) | System for information storage, retrieval and voice based content search and methods thereof | |
| US7937268B2 (en) | Facilitating navigation of voice data | |
| GB2323694A (en) | Adaptation in speech to text conversion | |
| US7251314B2 (en) | Voice message transfer between a sender and a receiver | |
| WO2001069905A1 (en) | Speech recognition system and method for converting voice mail messages to electronic mail messages | |
| US20030050772A1 (en) | Apparatus and method for an automated grammar file expansion tool | |
| WO2000018100A9 (en) | Interactive voice dialog application platform and methods for using the same | |
| US20050131698A1 (en) | System, method, and storage medium for generating speech generation commands associated with computer readable information | |
| KR100277065B1 (en) | The recording word control method on voice recogition voice mailing system | |
| JP2002304189A (en) | Method and device for documentation using voice recognition, recognition dictionary generation program, and recording medium with the program recorded | |
| KR100258140B1 (en) | Apparatus and method of voice recognition in voice mailing system | |
| Németh et al. | Problems of creating a flexible e-mail reader for Hungarian | |
| KR100227525B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for providing service of voice notebook in network | |
| JPH10190842A (en) | Speech interactive system | |
| GB2377119A (en) | Interactive voice response system |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20150625 |