CA2149381C - Electronic article surveillance system having enhanced tag deactivation capacity - Google Patents
Electronic article surveillance system having enhanced tag deactivation capacity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CA2149381C CA2149381C CA002149381A CA2149381A CA2149381C CA 2149381 C CA2149381 C CA 2149381C CA 002149381 A CA002149381 A CA 002149381A CA 2149381 A CA2149381 A CA 2149381A CA 2149381 C CA2149381 C CA 2149381C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- tag
- receiver
- detection
- detection sensitivity
- sensitivity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
- G08B13/22—Electrical actuation
- G08B13/24—Electrical actuation by interference with electromagnetic field distribution
- G08B13/2402—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting
- G08B13/2405—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used
- G08B13/2414—Electronic Article Surveillance [EAS], i.e. systems using tags for detecting removal of a tagged item from a secure area, e.g. tags for detecting shoplifting characterised by the tag technology used using inductive tags
- G08B13/242—Tag deactivation
Abstract
An electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system includes a transmitter, a receiver, a deactivation coil and a controller (microprocessor) for establishing time periods for operation of the transmitter, the receiver and the deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of the receiver. Detection of a tag prior to deactivation is effected with the receiver at low sensitivity and redetection of the tag subsequent to deactivation is effected with the receiver at high sensitivity.
Description
ELECTRONIC ARTICLE SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
HAVING ENHANCED TAG DEACTIVATION CAPACITY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to electronic ,article surveillance (EAS) tag deactivation systems and pertains more particularly to improved apparatus and practices for rendering electronic article surveillance tags inactive.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It has been customary in the electronic article surveillance (EAS) industry to apply to articles to be monitored disposable adhesive EAS tags or labels functioning as article monitoring devices. At article checkout stations in retail stores, a checkout clerk passes the article over deactivation apparatus which deactivates the monitoring device.
Known deactivation apparatus includes coil structure energizable to generate a magnetic field of magnitude sufficient to render the monitoring device inactive, i.e., no longer responsive to incident energy to itself provide output alarm or to transmit an alarm condition to an alarm=unit external to the tag.
One commercial deactivator of the assignee hereof employs one coil disposed horizontally within a housing and tagged articles are moved across the horizontal top surface of the housing such that the tag is disposed generally coplanarly with the coil.
In the normal course of events, the checkout operator deactivates the tag at the checkout station and the customer exits the store with the tagged article.
It is customary in EAS installations to provide a so-called "store exit station" to insure that tagged articles are not removed from a premise in non-deactivated state. Should an article with a tag not deactivated enter the store exit station, an alarm condition is called for.
At times, the deactivation of the checked out article tag is not effective. This results in embarrassment at the store exit station and the possible loss of future shopping in the store by the customer. To avert this situation, the prior art has looked to a "double check station" adjacent the checkout station and remote from the store exit station. The double check station interrogates the article tag, following intended deactivation thereof, and alerts the checkout clerk if indeed the article tag has indeed not been deactivated.
The double check station, while effective in avoiding embarrassment, the operator simply repeating the~deactivation cycle and the double check, is manifestly inefficient in requiring additional equipment and space consumption at the checkout station.
The prior art also teaches the use of a single system both to sense the presence of a tag at a deactivation station, to call then for deactivation and then to repeat tag detection, such as is disclosed in U. S. Patents No. 3,938,044 and 4,881,061. However, to the extent that the same detection sensitivity applies to the tag presence sensing and the repeat tag detection, where the tag, following deactivation efforts, is more distal from the detecting ~ ~ CA 02149381 2004-05-19 antenna, errors can arise, particularly with respect to partially deactivated tags.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the present invention has as its primary object the provision of improved EAS tag deactivation system and apparatus.
In a particular objective, an embodiment of the invention looks to providing EAS tag deactivation system and apparatus overcoming the disadvantages of the prior art above noted.
In attaining these and other objects, the invention provides, in an EAS tag deactivation system, a transmitter, a receiver, a deactivation coil and a controller (microprocessor) for establishing time periods for operation of the transmitter, the receiver and the deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of the receiver.
In another aspect, the invention provides a receiver for an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system controllable to exhibit variable tag detection sensitivity.
The invention also features methods for use in EAS
tag deactivation, discussed hereinafter.
There is also provided an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system, comprising: (a) a transmitter; (b) a receiver; (c) a deactivation coil; and (d) control means for establishing time periods for operation of said transmitter, said receiver and said deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of said receiver.
HAVING ENHANCED TAG DEACTIVATION CAPACITY
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to electronic ,article surveillance (EAS) tag deactivation systems and pertains more particularly to improved apparatus and practices for rendering electronic article surveillance tags inactive.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
It has been customary in the electronic article surveillance (EAS) industry to apply to articles to be monitored disposable adhesive EAS tags or labels functioning as article monitoring devices. At article checkout stations in retail stores, a checkout clerk passes the article over deactivation apparatus which deactivates the monitoring device.
Known deactivation apparatus includes coil structure energizable to generate a magnetic field of magnitude sufficient to render the monitoring device inactive, i.e., no longer responsive to incident energy to itself provide output alarm or to transmit an alarm condition to an alarm=unit external to the tag.
One commercial deactivator of the assignee hereof employs one coil disposed horizontally within a housing and tagged articles are moved across the horizontal top surface of the housing such that the tag is disposed generally coplanarly with the coil.
In the normal course of events, the checkout operator deactivates the tag at the checkout station and the customer exits the store with the tagged article.
It is customary in EAS installations to provide a so-called "store exit station" to insure that tagged articles are not removed from a premise in non-deactivated state. Should an article with a tag not deactivated enter the store exit station, an alarm condition is called for.
At times, the deactivation of the checked out article tag is not effective. This results in embarrassment at the store exit station and the possible loss of future shopping in the store by the customer. To avert this situation, the prior art has looked to a "double check station" adjacent the checkout station and remote from the store exit station. The double check station interrogates the article tag, following intended deactivation thereof, and alerts the checkout clerk if indeed the article tag has indeed not been deactivated.
The double check station, while effective in avoiding embarrassment, the operator simply repeating the~deactivation cycle and the double check, is manifestly inefficient in requiring additional equipment and space consumption at the checkout station.
The prior art also teaches the use of a single system both to sense the presence of a tag at a deactivation station, to call then for deactivation and then to repeat tag detection, such as is disclosed in U. S. Patents No. 3,938,044 and 4,881,061. However, to the extent that the same detection sensitivity applies to the tag presence sensing and the repeat tag detection, where the tag, following deactivation efforts, is more distal from the detecting ~ ~ CA 02149381 2004-05-19 antenna, errors can arise, particularly with respect to partially deactivated tags.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An embodiment of the present invention has as its primary object the provision of improved EAS tag deactivation system and apparatus.
In a particular objective, an embodiment of the invention looks to providing EAS tag deactivation system and apparatus overcoming the disadvantages of the prior art above noted.
In attaining these and other objects, the invention provides, in an EAS tag deactivation system, a transmitter, a receiver, a deactivation coil and a controller (microprocessor) for establishing time periods for operation of the transmitter, the receiver and the deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of the receiver.
In another aspect, the invention provides a receiver for an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system controllable to exhibit variable tag detection sensitivity.
The invention also features methods for use in EAS
tag deactivation, discussed hereinafter.
There is also provided an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system, comprising: (a) a transmitter; (b) a receiver; (c) a deactivation coil; and (d) control means for establishing time periods for operation of said transmitter, said receiver and said deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of said receiver.
In a further aspect, there is provided a receiver for an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system for receiving a signal from at least one of said electronic article surveillance tags, said receiver having a signal detector controllable to exhibit variable tag detection sensitivity in said receiver.
Another aspect of the invention provides a method for deactivating electronic article surveillance tags, comprising the steps of: (a) establishing a tag detection field; (b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities; (c) setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag; (d) reestablishing said tag detection field; and (e) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity.
According to a further aspect, the invention provides a method for deactivating electronic article surveillance tags, comprising the steps of: (a) establishing a tag detection field; (b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities; (c) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity; and (d) upon redetection of said tag by said receiver when set to said first tag detection sensitivity, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag.
The foregoing and other objects and features of embodiments of the invention will be further understood from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof and from the drawings, wherein like reference numerals identify like components throughout.
-3a-DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a general block diagram of an EAS tag deactivation system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
-3b-w 21.4931 Fig. 2 is a partial block diagram of the receiver of the Fig.
1. EAS tag deactivation system.
Fig. 3 is a flow chart of a first deactivation practice in accordance with the invention as implemented by the microprocessor of the Fig. 1 EAS tag deactivation system. , Figs. 4a and 4b present a flow chart of a second deactivation practice in accordance with the invention as implemented by the microprocessor of the Fig. 1 EAS tag deactivation system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS AND PRACTICES
With the exception of components noted with a prime ('), EAS
tag deactivation system 10 of Fig. 1 is quite well known in the prior art. Microprocessor MP' is typically programmed to provide a signal on line 12 to energize transmitter TX, which furnishes excitation over line 14 to transmitting antenna TX ANT. Receiving antenna RX ANT furnishes received signals over line 16 to receiver RX', which communicates with microprocessor MP' over lines 18.
Line 20 furnishes microprocessor control signals for tag deactivator driver DEAC DRVR, which in turn furnishes excitation over line 22 to deactivation coil DEAL COIL.
The known EAS tag deactivation system is changed in accordance with the subject invention by modifying receiver RX' to have variable sensitivity, by modifying microprocessor MP' to have facility for controlling the receiver sensitivity and by providing line 24' to convey sensitivity control information from the microprocessor to the receiver.
--~ --.
~14~3$1 The modified receiver RX' is shown in Fig. 2. Received signals on antenna output line 16 are amplified in low noise amplifier LNA and applied to transmitting blank TX BLANK unit, which mutes the receiver during transmitting periods per microprocessor control over line 18c. During non-transmitting periods, line 28 provides signals to bandpass filter BPF, whose output signals are furnished to line 30.
The receiver RX' of the invention at this juncture introduces programmable gain amplifier PGA', the gain of which is controlled by the microprocessor by signals on the aforementioned line 24'.
Amplified signals are conveyed over lines 32 and 34 to receiver zero degree phase processing circuitry RXO PROC, and over lines 32 and 36 to receiver ninety degree phase processing circuitry RX90 PROC, and receiver in-phase and quadrature output signals are provided to the microprocessor over lines 18a and 18b, respectively. .
A first practice in accordance with the invention will be understood by reference to the flow chart of Fig. 3. In step S1, SET PGA TO LOW GAIN, the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a low gain whereby the receiver has low sensitivity.
In step S2, ? TAG DETECTED, the microprocessor examines receiver output signals on lines 18a and 18b to determine whether a tag is present at the checkout station. Upon negative (N) answers to the step S2 inquiry, the step is repeated. Upon an affirmative (Y) answer, progress is to step S3, IMPLEMENT DEACTIVATION, and the ~14~381 microprocessor initiates tag deactivation by signal provided on line 20 of Fig. 1.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S4 inquiry, ? DEACTIVATION
COMPLETE, progress is to step S5, SET PGA TO HIGH GAIN, wherein the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a high gain whereby the receiver has high sensitivity.
l Tag deactivation at checkout is a continuous process, involving tag after tag. For example, at a bookstore, a customer may be purchasing several books and the checkout clerk may pass the series of books over the deactivator within seconds of each other.
Accordingly, a time period for checking individual tags for deactivation is established, preferably some three hundred and fifty milliseconds.
In step S6A, START TIME COUNT FROM T = ZERO, the time period is started. In step S6B, ? TAG REDETECTED, inquiry is made as to whether a tag intended to be deactivated is not- deactivated.
With the receiver now at high sensitivity, double checking is effected with correspondingly enhanced ability, so as to detect not only tags which have not been deactivated, but also to detect partially deactivated tags. Further, the "volume" of the detection capability is extended, i.e., the tag can be further from the receiving antenna than would otherwise be the case.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S6B inquiry, progress is to step S7, ALERT OPERATOR, wherein a warning tone or the like is provided to call for repeat of the deactivation cycle of Fig. 3.
Another aspect of the invention provides a method for deactivating electronic article surveillance tags, comprising the steps of: (a) establishing a tag detection field; (b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities; (c) setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag; (d) reestablishing said tag detection field; and (e) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity.
According to a further aspect, the invention provides a method for deactivating electronic article surveillance tags, comprising the steps of: (a) establishing a tag detection field; (b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities; (c) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity; and (d) upon redetection of said tag by said receiver when set to said first tag detection sensitivity, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag.
The foregoing and other objects and features of embodiments of the invention will be further understood from the following detailed description of preferred embodiments thereof and from the drawings, wherein like reference numerals identify like components throughout.
-3a-DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Fig. 1 is a general block diagram of an EAS tag deactivation system in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
-3b-w 21.4931 Fig. 2 is a partial block diagram of the receiver of the Fig.
1. EAS tag deactivation system.
Fig. 3 is a flow chart of a first deactivation practice in accordance with the invention as implemented by the microprocessor of the Fig. 1 EAS tag deactivation system. , Figs. 4a and 4b present a flow chart of a second deactivation practice in accordance with the invention as implemented by the microprocessor of the Fig. 1 EAS tag deactivation system.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS AND PRACTICES
With the exception of components noted with a prime ('), EAS
tag deactivation system 10 of Fig. 1 is quite well known in the prior art. Microprocessor MP' is typically programmed to provide a signal on line 12 to energize transmitter TX, which furnishes excitation over line 14 to transmitting antenna TX ANT. Receiving antenna RX ANT furnishes received signals over line 16 to receiver RX', which communicates with microprocessor MP' over lines 18.
Line 20 furnishes microprocessor control signals for tag deactivator driver DEAC DRVR, which in turn furnishes excitation over line 22 to deactivation coil DEAL COIL.
The known EAS tag deactivation system is changed in accordance with the subject invention by modifying receiver RX' to have variable sensitivity, by modifying microprocessor MP' to have facility for controlling the receiver sensitivity and by providing line 24' to convey sensitivity control information from the microprocessor to the receiver.
--~ --.
~14~3$1 The modified receiver RX' is shown in Fig. 2. Received signals on antenna output line 16 are amplified in low noise amplifier LNA and applied to transmitting blank TX BLANK unit, which mutes the receiver during transmitting periods per microprocessor control over line 18c. During non-transmitting periods, line 28 provides signals to bandpass filter BPF, whose output signals are furnished to line 30.
The receiver RX' of the invention at this juncture introduces programmable gain amplifier PGA', the gain of which is controlled by the microprocessor by signals on the aforementioned line 24'.
Amplified signals are conveyed over lines 32 and 34 to receiver zero degree phase processing circuitry RXO PROC, and over lines 32 and 36 to receiver ninety degree phase processing circuitry RX90 PROC, and receiver in-phase and quadrature output signals are provided to the microprocessor over lines 18a and 18b, respectively. .
A first practice in accordance with the invention will be understood by reference to the flow chart of Fig. 3. In step S1, SET PGA TO LOW GAIN, the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a low gain whereby the receiver has low sensitivity.
In step S2, ? TAG DETECTED, the microprocessor examines receiver output signals on lines 18a and 18b to determine whether a tag is present at the checkout station. Upon negative (N) answers to the step S2 inquiry, the step is repeated. Upon an affirmative (Y) answer, progress is to step S3, IMPLEMENT DEACTIVATION, and the ~14~381 microprocessor initiates tag deactivation by signal provided on line 20 of Fig. 1.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S4 inquiry, ? DEACTIVATION
COMPLETE, progress is to step S5, SET PGA TO HIGH GAIN, wherein the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a high gain whereby the receiver has high sensitivity.
l Tag deactivation at checkout is a continuous process, involving tag after tag. For example, at a bookstore, a customer may be purchasing several books and the checkout clerk may pass the series of books over the deactivator within seconds of each other.
Accordingly, a time period for checking individual tags for deactivation is established, preferably some three hundred and fifty milliseconds.
In step S6A, START TIME COUNT FROM T = ZERO, the time period is started. In step S6B, ? TAG REDETECTED, inquiry is made as to whether a tag intended to be deactivated is not- deactivated.
With the receiver now at high sensitivity, double checking is effected with correspondingly enhanced ability, so as to detect not only tags which have not been deactivated, but also to detect partially deactivated tags. Further, the "volume" of the detection capability is extended, i.e., the tag can be further from the receiving antenna than would otherwise be the case.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S6B inquiry, progress is to step S7, ALERT OPERATOR, wherein a warning tone or the like is provided to call for repeat of the deactivation cycle of Fig. 3.
~1493~1 Upon negative answer to the step 6A inquiry, progress is to step S6C, ? DOES TIME COUNT EQUAL T1. If the time period has not expired, step S6B is repeated. When the time period has expired, progress is to step S1 and deactivation of the next tag in the series. In effect, steps S6A-S6C establish a time period for practice of the step S7 of providing an alert indication upon the receiver detection of a when set at the second tag detection sensitivity.
A second practice in accordance with the invention will be understood by reference to the flow chart of Figs. 4a and 4b. In step S8, SET PGA TO HIGH GAIN, the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a high gain whereby the receiver has high sensitivity. In step S9, ? TAG DETECTED, the microprocessor examines receiver output signals on lines 18a and 18b to determine whether a tag is present at the checkout station. Upon negative (N) answers to the step S9 inquiry, the step is:repeated. Upon an affirmative (Y) answer, progress is to step S10, SET PGA TO LOW
GAIN, wherein the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a low gain whereby the receiver has low sensitivity.
In step 511, START TIME COUNT FROM T - ZERO, the microprocessor commences measurement of the passage of time. Step S12, ? TAG REDETECTED, is then practiced.
Upon negative answer to the step S12 inquiry, progress is to step 513, ? DOES TIME COUNT EQUAL T1, wherein the microprocessor determines whether a preset time period, zero to T1, has expired without redetection of the tag. If the preset time period has not ~1493~1 expired, progress is back to step 512. If the preset time period has expired without tag redetection, progress is to step S14 , ALERT
OPERATOR, where a warning tone or the like is provided to call for repeat of the deactivation cycle of Figs 4a and 4b.
Upon affirmative inquiry to the step S12 inquiry, progress is to step S15, IMPLEMENT DEACTIVATION, and the microprocessor initiates tag deactivation by signal provided on line 20 of Fig. 1.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S16 inquiry, ? DEACTIVATION
COMPLETE, progress is to step 517, SET PGA TO HIGH GAIN, wherein the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a high gain whereby the receiver has high sensitivity. Step 518, ? TAG
REDETECTED, is then practiced.
As in the case of the Fig. 3 practice, with the receiver now at high sensitivity, double checking is effected with correspondingly enhanced ability, so as to detect not only tags L
which have not been deactivated, but also to detect partially deactivated tags. Further, the "volume" of the detection capability is likewise extended, i.e., the tag can be further from the receiving antenna than would otherwise be the case.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S18 inquiry, progress is to step 519, ALERT OPERATOR, wherein a warning tone or the like is provided to call for repeat of the deactivation cycle of Figs. 4a and 4b. Upon negative answer to the step S19 inquiry, progress is to step S8 and deactivation of the next tag presented to the system.
_g_ As will be appreciated, the second practice may evidently include, in lieu of step 518, steps S6A-S6C of Fig. 3, wherein a time period for practice of tag redetection is set.
By way of summary and in introduction of the ensuing claims, the invention will be seen in its system aspect to comprise a transmitter, a receiver, a deactivation coil and a controller (microprocessor) for establishing time periods for operation of the transmitter, the receiver and the deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of the receiver. In particular, the controller sets a time period for operation of the transmitter, a successive first time period for operation of the receiver, a successive second time period upon receiver detection of a tag for operation of the deactivation coil, a successive third time period for operation of the transmitter and a successive fourth time period for operation of the receiver. The controller changes the receiver detection sensitivity from a first sensitivity in the successive first time period to a second sensitivity in the successive fourth time period. The second sensitivity is higher than the first sensitivity.
The receiver comprises a variable gain amplifier and the controller controls the gain of the variable gain amplifier.
In another aspect, the invention provides a receiver for an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system controllable to exhibit variable tag detection sensitivity.
In one method aspect, the invention involves steps of establishing a tag detection field, providing a receiver having at _g_ least first and second different tag detection sensitivities, setting the receiver to the first tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by the receiver, applying a tag deactivating field to the tag, reestablishing the tag detection field, and setting the receiver to the second tag detection sensitivity. A further step is that of providing an alert indication upon the receiver detecting the tag when set at the second tag detection sensitivity. The steps establishing and reestablishing the field are practiced by using the same transmitter. To accommodate rapid response to redetection of a series of tags, a time period for practice of tag redetection is set In another method aspect, the invention involves steps of establishing a tag detection field, providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities, setting the receiver to the second tag detection sensitivity and upon detection of a tag by the receiver, setting the receiver to the first tag detection sensitivity, and upon redetection of the tag by the receiver when set to the first tag detection sensitivity, applying a tag deactivating field to the tag. Further steps are establishing a time period upon setting the receiver to the first detection sensitivity for the tag redetection and providing an alert indication upon the receiver not redetecting the tag during the time period.
Still further steps, following deactivation, are resetting the receiver to the second detection sensitivity and reestablishing the tag detection field. A final step is that of providing an alert indication upon the receiver detecting the tag when reset to the second tag detection sensitivity. Again, the steps establishing and reestablishing the field are practiced by using the same transmitter.
Various chan es to the g particularly disclosed embodiments and practices may evidently be introduced without departing from the invention. Accordingly, it is to be appreciated that the particularly discussed and depicted preferred embodiments and practices of the invention are intended in an illustrative and not in a limiting sense. The true spirit and scope of the invention are set forth in the ensuing claims.
A second practice in accordance with the invention will be understood by reference to the flow chart of Figs. 4a and 4b. In step S8, SET PGA TO HIGH GAIN, the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a high gain whereby the receiver has high sensitivity. In step S9, ? TAG DETECTED, the microprocessor examines receiver output signals on lines 18a and 18b to determine whether a tag is present at the checkout station. Upon negative (N) answers to the step S9 inquiry, the step is:repeated. Upon an affirmative (Y) answer, progress is to step S10, SET PGA TO LOW
GAIN, wherein the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a low gain whereby the receiver has low sensitivity.
In step 511, START TIME COUNT FROM T - ZERO, the microprocessor commences measurement of the passage of time. Step S12, ? TAG REDETECTED, is then practiced.
Upon negative answer to the step S12 inquiry, progress is to step 513, ? DOES TIME COUNT EQUAL T1, wherein the microprocessor determines whether a preset time period, zero to T1, has expired without redetection of the tag. If the preset time period has not ~1493~1 expired, progress is back to step 512. If the preset time period has expired without tag redetection, progress is to step S14 , ALERT
OPERATOR, where a warning tone or the like is provided to call for repeat of the deactivation cycle of Figs 4a and 4b.
Upon affirmative inquiry to the step S12 inquiry, progress is to step S15, IMPLEMENT DEACTIVATION, and the microprocessor initiates tag deactivation by signal provided on line 20 of Fig. 1.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S16 inquiry, ? DEACTIVATION
COMPLETE, progress is to step 517, SET PGA TO HIGH GAIN, wherein the microprocessor sets the programmable gain amplifier to a high gain whereby the receiver has high sensitivity. Step 518, ? TAG
REDETECTED, is then practiced.
As in the case of the Fig. 3 practice, with the receiver now at high sensitivity, double checking is effected with correspondingly enhanced ability, so as to detect not only tags L
which have not been deactivated, but also to detect partially deactivated tags. Further, the "volume" of the detection capability is likewise extended, i.e., the tag can be further from the receiving antenna than would otherwise be the case.
Upon affirmative answer to the step S18 inquiry, progress is to step 519, ALERT OPERATOR, wherein a warning tone or the like is provided to call for repeat of the deactivation cycle of Figs. 4a and 4b. Upon negative answer to the step S19 inquiry, progress is to step S8 and deactivation of the next tag presented to the system.
_g_ As will be appreciated, the second practice may evidently include, in lieu of step 518, steps S6A-S6C of Fig. 3, wherein a time period for practice of tag redetection is set.
By way of summary and in introduction of the ensuing claims, the invention will be seen in its system aspect to comprise a transmitter, a receiver, a deactivation coil and a controller (microprocessor) for establishing time periods for operation of the transmitter, the receiver and the deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of the receiver. In particular, the controller sets a time period for operation of the transmitter, a successive first time period for operation of the receiver, a successive second time period upon receiver detection of a tag for operation of the deactivation coil, a successive third time period for operation of the transmitter and a successive fourth time period for operation of the receiver. The controller changes the receiver detection sensitivity from a first sensitivity in the successive first time period to a second sensitivity in the successive fourth time period. The second sensitivity is higher than the first sensitivity.
The receiver comprises a variable gain amplifier and the controller controls the gain of the variable gain amplifier.
In another aspect, the invention provides a receiver for an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system controllable to exhibit variable tag detection sensitivity.
In one method aspect, the invention involves steps of establishing a tag detection field, providing a receiver having at _g_ least first and second different tag detection sensitivities, setting the receiver to the first tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by the receiver, applying a tag deactivating field to the tag, reestablishing the tag detection field, and setting the receiver to the second tag detection sensitivity. A further step is that of providing an alert indication upon the receiver detecting the tag when set at the second tag detection sensitivity. The steps establishing and reestablishing the field are practiced by using the same transmitter. To accommodate rapid response to redetection of a series of tags, a time period for practice of tag redetection is set In another method aspect, the invention involves steps of establishing a tag detection field, providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities, setting the receiver to the second tag detection sensitivity and upon detection of a tag by the receiver, setting the receiver to the first tag detection sensitivity, and upon redetection of the tag by the receiver when set to the first tag detection sensitivity, applying a tag deactivating field to the tag. Further steps are establishing a time period upon setting the receiver to the first detection sensitivity for the tag redetection and providing an alert indication upon the receiver not redetecting the tag during the time period.
Still further steps, following deactivation, are resetting the receiver to the second detection sensitivity and reestablishing the tag detection field. A final step is that of providing an alert indication upon the receiver detecting the tag when reset to the second tag detection sensitivity. Again, the steps establishing and reestablishing the field are practiced by using the same transmitter.
Various chan es to the g particularly disclosed embodiments and practices may evidently be introduced without departing from the invention. Accordingly, it is to be appreciated that the particularly discussed and depicted preferred embodiments and practices of the invention are intended in an illustrative and not in a limiting sense. The true spirit and scope of the invention are set forth in the ensuing claims.
Claims (20)
1. An electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system, comprising:
(a) a transmitter;
(b) a receiver;
(c) a deactivation coil; and (d) control means for establishing time periods for operation of said transmitter, said receiver and said deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of said receiver.
(a) a transmitter;
(b) a receiver;
(c) a deactivation coil; and (d) control means for establishing time periods for operation of said transmitter, said receiver and said deactivation coil, and for selectively varying detection sensitivity of said receiver.
2. The system claimed in claim 1, wherein said control means sets a time period for operation of said transmitter, a successive first time period for operation of said receiver, a successive second time period upon receiver detection of a tag for operation of said deactivation coil, a successive third time period for operation of said transmitter and a successive fourth time period for operation of said receiver, said control means changing the receiver detection sensitivity from a first sensitivity in said successive first time period to a second sensitivity in said successive fourth time period.
3. The system claimed in claim 2, wherein said second sensitivity is higher than said first sensitivity.
4. The system claimed in claim 1, wherein said receiver comprises a variable gain amplifier and wherein said control means controls the gain of said variable gain amplifier.
5. The system claimed in claim 4, wherein said variable gain amplifier is a programmable gain amplifier.
6. A receiver for an electronic article surveillance tag deactivation system for receiving a signal from at least one of said electronic article surveillance tags, said receiver having a signal detector controllable to exhibit variable tag detection sensitivity in said receiver.
7. The receiver claimed in claim 6, comprising a variable gain amplifier controllable to provide said receiver variable tag detection sensitivity.
8. The receiver claimed in claim 7, wherein said variable gain amplifier is a programmable gain amplifier.
9. A method for deactivating electronic article surveillance tags, comprising the steps of:
(a) establishing a tag detection field;
(b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities;
(c) setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag;
(d) reestablishing said tag detection field; and (e) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity.
(a) establishing a tag detection field;
(b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities;
(c) setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag;
(d) reestablishing said tag detection field; and (e) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity.
10. The method claimed in claim 9, including the further step of providing an alert indication upon said receiver detection of said tag when set at said second tag detection sensitivity.
11. The method claimed in claim 9 wherein said second tag detection sensitivity is selected to be higher than said first detection sensitivity.
12. The method claimed in claim 9 wherein said steps (a) and (d) are practiced by using a single transmitter.
13. A method for deactivating electronic article surveillance tags, comprising the steps of:
(a) establishing a tag detection field;
(b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities;
(c) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity; and (d) upon redetection of said tag by said receiver when set to said first tag detection sensitivity, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag.
(a) establishing a tag detection field;
(b) providing a receiver having at least first and second different tag detection sensitivities;
(c) setting said receiver to said second tag detection sensitivity and, upon detection of a tag by said receiver, setting said receiver to said first tag detection sensitivity; and (d) upon redetection of said tag by said receiver when set to said first tag detection sensitivity, applying a tag deactivating field to said tag.
14. The method claimed in claim 13, including the further steps of establishing a time period upon setting said receiver to said first detection sensitivity for said tag redetection and providing an alert indication upon said receiver not redetecting said tag during said time period.
15. The method claimed in claim 13, including the further steps, practiced after completion of said step (d), of resetting said receiver to said second detection sensitivity and reestablishing said tag detection field.
16. The method claimed in claim 15, including the further step of providing an alert indication upon said receiver detection of said tag when reset to said second tag detection sensitivity.
17. The method claimed in claim 13, wherein said second tag detection sensitivity is selected to be higher than said first detection sensitivity.
18. The method claimed in claim 13 wherein said steps of establishing said tag detection field and applying said tag deactivating field are practiced by using a single transmitter.
19. The method claimed in claim 10, including the further step of establishing a time period for practice of said step of providing an alert indication upon said receiver detection of said tag when set at said second tag detection sensitivity.
20. The method claimed in claim 16, including the further step of establishing a time period for practice of said step of providing an alert indication upon said receiver detection of said tag when set at said second tag detection sensitivity.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US08/288,087 | 1994-08-10 | ||
US08/288,087 US5469142A (en) | 1994-08-10 | 1994-08-10 | Electronic article surveillance system having enhanced tag deactivation capacity |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA2149381A1 CA2149381A1 (en) | 1996-02-11 |
CA2149381C true CA2149381C (en) | 2006-07-04 |
Family
ID=23105684
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA002149381A Expired - Fee Related CA2149381C (en) | 1994-08-10 | 1995-05-15 | Electronic article surveillance system having enhanced tag deactivation capacity |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US5469142A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0696783B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP4183764B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR9503585A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2149381C (en) |
DE (1) | DE69514441T2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (28)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5777884A (en) * | 1995-10-16 | 1998-07-07 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Article inventory tracking and control system |
US5856788A (en) * | 1996-03-12 | 1999-01-05 | Single Chips Systems Corp. | Method and apparatus for radiofrequency identification tags |
US5860144A (en) * | 1996-08-09 | 1999-01-12 | Oracle Corporation | Addressing method and system for providing access of a very large size physical memory buffer to a number of processes |
GB2317075B (en) * | 1996-09-10 | 2001-03-07 | Herbert & Sons Ltd | Weighing device |
US5990794A (en) * | 1996-09-26 | 1999-11-23 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Apparatus for data communication and deactivation of electronic article surveillance tags |
US6060988A (en) * | 1997-02-03 | 2000-05-09 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | EAS marker deactivation device having core-wound energized coils |
US5867101A (en) * | 1997-02-03 | 1999-02-02 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Multi-phase mode multiple coil distance deactivator for magnetomechanical EAS markers |
US6111507A (en) * | 1997-02-03 | 2000-08-29 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Energizing circuit for EAS marker deactivation device |
US5917412A (en) * | 1997-05-21 | 1999-06-29 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Deactivation device with biplanar deactivation |
US6529127B2 (en) * | 1997-07-11 | 2003-03-04 | Microstrain, Inc. | System for remote powering and communication with a network of addressable, multichannel sensing modules |
US6114961A (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2000-09-05 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | Multi-technology in-line EAS deactivation apparatus |
JP4037269B2 (en) * | 2001-02-12 | 2008-01-23 | シンボル テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド | Radio frequency identification architecture |
US7389918B2 (en) * | 2001-10-23 | 2008-06-24 | Ncr Corporation | Automatic electronic article surveillance for self-checkout |
WO2003088006A2 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2003-10-23 | Sensormatic Electronics Corporation | System and method for managing assets using a portable combined electronic article surveillance system and barcode scanner |
US20040046642A1 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2004-03-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Protocol for addressing groups of RFID tags |
US6726099B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2004-04-27 | Honeywell International Inc. | RFID tag having multiple transceivers |
US7044387B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2006-05-16 | Honeywell International Inc. | RFID tag and communication protocol for long range tag communications and power efficiency |
US7239229B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2007-07-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | Efficient protocol for reading RFID tags |
US7573370B2 (en) * | 2002-09-05 | 2009-08-11 | Honeywell International Inc. | Method and device for storing and distributing information in an RFID tag |
US6942145B1 (en) * | 2003-06-11 | 2005-09-13 | Ncr Corporation | Checkout device with enhanced security label detection |
WO2005008578A2 (en) * | 2003-07-07 | 2005-01-27 | Avery Dennison Corporation | Rfid device with changeable characteristics |
US20060108421A1 (en) * | 2003-12-03 | 2006-05-25 | Becker Robert C | RFID tag having multiple transceivers |
KR101101763B1 (en) | 2004-02-20 | 2012-01-05 | 체크포인트 시스템즈 인코포레이티드 | System and method for automatic detachment of a security tags |
US7380711B2 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2008-06-03 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Self-check system and method for protecting digital media |
US7253734B2 (en) * | 2004-09-22 | 2007-08-07 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for altering or disabling RFID tags |
US7852197B2 (en) * | 2007-06-08 | 2010-12-14 | Sensomatic Electronics, LLC | System and method for inhibiting detection of deactivated labels using detection filters having an adaptive threshold |
KR20090061254A (en) * | 2007-12-11 | 2009-06-16 | 한국전자통신연구원 | Rfid privacy protection method and apparatus |
CN108363932B (en) | 2017-01-26 | 2023-04-18 | 手持产品公司 | Method for reading bar code and deactivating electronic anti-theft label of commodity |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3938044A (en) * | 1973-11-14 | 1976-02-10 | Lichtblau G J | Antenna apparatus for an electronic security system |
US4476459A (en) * | 1981-10-23 | 1984-10-09 | Knogo Corporation | Theft detection method and apparatus in which the decay of a resonant circuit is detected |
US4881061A (en) * | 1988-12-05 | 1989-11-14 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Article removal control system |
US5027106A (en) * | 1989-12-27 | 1991-06-25 | Checkpoint Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for electronic article surveillance |
-
1994
- 1994-08-10 US US08/288,087 patent/US5469142A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1995
- 1995-05-15 CA CA002149381A patent/CA2149381C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-06-23 JP JP18111095A patent/JP4183764B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1995-07-04 EP EP95110401A patent/EP0696783B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-07-04 DE DE69514441T patent/DE69514441T2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-08-09 BR BR9503585A patent/BR9503585A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE69514441D1 (en) | 2000-02-17 |
EP0696783B1 (en) | 2000-01-12 |
CA2149381A1 (en) | 1996-02-11 |
EP0696783A1 (en) | 1996-02-14 |
JP4183764B2 (en) | 2008-11-19 |
BR9503585A (en) | 1997-09-30 |
US5469142A (en) | 1995-11-21 |
DE69514441T2 (en) | 2000-07-06 |
JPH08190678A (en) | 1996-07-23 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA2149381C (en) | Electronic article surveillance system having enhanced tag deactivation capacity | |
US4728938A (en) | Security tag deactivation system | |
US5081445A (en) | Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system, and tags or labels useful in connection therewith | |
US5874896A (en) | Electronic anti-shoplifting system employing an RFID tag | |
US3810147A (en) | Electronic security system | |
EP0410245B1 (en) | Multi-Mode Electronic article Surveillance System | |
US5495229A (en) | Pulsed electronic article surveillance device employing expert system techniques for dynamic optimization | |
KR101728829B1 (en) | Method and system for receiver nulling using coherent transmit signals | |
US4818973A (en) | System for detecting a transfer of an article | |
AU637418B2 (en) | Method for tagging articles used in conjunction with an electronic article surveillance system, and tags or labels useful in connection therewith | |
US5805065A (en) | Electro-magnetic desensitizer | |
AU769526B2 (en) | Security systems for inhibiting theft of goods from retail stores | |
CA2105226C (en) | Apparatus and method for detecting magnetic electronic article surveillance markers | |
JP2993609B2 (en) | Electromagnetic noise detector | |
EP1619639A2 (en) | Electronic detection system for detecting antitheft and/or identification labels | |
WO1990003623A1 (en) | System for verification of de-activation of anti-theft markers | |
Bhatt et al. | A Comparative Study of Electronic Article Surveillance (EAS) System | |
JPH0262698A (en) | Tag card identification system | |
AU9610898A (en) | Pulsed electronic article surveillance device employing expert system techniques for dynamic optimization |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
EEER | Examination request | ||
MKLA | Lapsed |
Effective date: 20130515 |