CA2076965A1 - System and process for converting constant dollar financial instruments - Google Patents
System and process for converting constant dollar financial instrumentsInfo
- Publication number
- CA2076965A1 CA2076965A1 CA002076965A CA2076965A CA2076965A1 CA 2076965 A1 CA2076965 A1 CA 2076965A1 CA 002076965 A CA002076965 A CA 002076965A CA 2076965 A CA2076965 A CA 2076965A CA 2076965 A1 CA2076965 A1 CA 2076965A1
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- dollar
- nominal
- constant
- period
- payment
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/02—Banking, e.g. interest calculation or account maintenance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/166—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting
- G06F40/177—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting of tables; using ruled lines
- G06F40/18—Editing, e.g. inserting or deleting of tables; using ruled lines of spreadsheets
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/04—Trading; Exchange, e.g. stocks, commodities, derivatives or currency exchange
Abstract
The present invention discloses a method and apparatus for converting constant-dollar financial instruments into equivalent nominal-dollar instruments. After the optimal form or forms of constant-dollar financial instruments have been determined for the purposes of financing a specific enterprise or activity, the data describing the constant-dollar financial instrument or instruments are entered into the system together with the specified inflation measure and the desired frequency of adjustements to the nominal-dollar interest rate and to the nominal-dollar payments. The data processing system puts the specified constant-dollar instrument or instruments into a standardized format and, given the desired frequency of inflation adjustements to be made to the nominal-dollar interest rate and to the nominal-dollar payments, the system specifies the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument or instruments in a standardized format. Every payment and/or compounding period the data processing system calculates the nominal-dollar interest rate(s), nominal-dollar payment(s), nominal-dollar call price(s), and remaining nominal-dollar principal balance for the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument or instruments.
Description
Wo 91/13409 pcr/uss1/o11ol 207~9~
A SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR CONVERTING
CONSTANT DOLLAR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
BACK~ROUND O~ THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a system and process for specifying a constant-dollar financial instrument and then, step-by-step~ primary component-by-primary component, ~ransforming the desired constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
In the prior art, there is disclosed processes for specif~ing a nominal-dollar financial instrument and then adJusting the nominal-dollar financial instrument (in varying degrees) for the impact of inflation. However. such prior art type processec do not achieve the advantages of the present inven-tion. The constant-dollar firlancial instrument of the present invention make use of the l~matching principle~ as will be discussed below.
Constant dollar financial instruments are financial instruments whose primary components are defined in terms of constant-dollars. Constant dol-lars are nominal-dollars, ~the dollars of ordinary commerce), adjusted by the use of a price index, thereby eliminating the impact o inflation on the pur-chasing power or the dollar (i.e., constant-dollars are dollars with constant purchasing power as opposed to constant face value). Nominal dollars are dollars having a constant face value. For example, a olle dollar bill is a nominal~ollar. However, two years from now that one dollar, given tlle effects of inflation, will have a purchasing power of less than one dollar.
The inventors of the present invention have established that the appli-cation of the l~matching principle~ requires the general utilization of constant-dollar financial instruments by providers ~nd users of funds tllrough-out the financial system, The "matching principle~ is a fundamentaî principle in the area of j~
applied finance that has ~een the su~ect of very little academic research. It applies to both users and providers of funds.
.
,, , -, ' ,,~
.. .. ..
., , , , . ., .. ~ . "
WO 91t13409 PCr/US91/01101 ~7~6~ 2-For users of funds, the application of the ~'matching principle~' requires that the characteristics of the financial instruments issued by the user of funds should be matched as closely as possible to the characteristics of the investments being financed by the user of funds. For providers of funds, tlle application of the "matching principle" requires that the characteristics of the financial instrument in which a provider of funds invests sllould be matched as closely as possible to the characteristics of the liabilities being funded by the provider of funds.
Final users of funds invest in the real productive capital (e.g.. plant and equipment, commercial real estate, social infrastructure, etc.) of the econ-omy. These "Real" assets have expected income streams and expected depre-ciation schedules that are most accurately described in terms of constant dol-lars as opposed to nominal dollars. This is because their future income streams and depreciation schedules as measured in nominal dollars will vary with unlcnown future inflation rates, but this variation is eliminated by utiliz-ing constant dollars which are unaffected by future inflation.
The application of the "matching principle" to final users of funds requires that the payment schedule of the instrument match the time pattern of tlle income stream of the asset ~eing financed and that the amortization schedule of the instrualent match the depreciation schedule of the asset being financed. Since both the income stream and the depreciation schedules of the assets being financed are most accurately defined in terms of constant dollars.
both the paymen~ and amortiza~ion schedules of the financial instrument must also be defined in terms of constant dollars. Mathematical consistency then requires ~hat the rate of return must also be defined in terms of constant dol-lars. Therefore, application of the matching principle requires that final users of funds utilize cons~ant~ollar financial instruments to finance their investments in real assets.
Final providers of funds are the actual savers in the economy or their agents. The a~tual savers in the economy are those who choose to forgo con-5urnption in order to save - i.e., the individual consumers in the economy. The agents of the actual savers are those institutions to whom individual consum-ers have delega~ed some part of their saving activity. Pension funds are tl~e largest and fastest growing agents of aetual savers. Pension funds are also the largest and fastest growing source of long-term funds in the economy.
WO 91t13409 PCI/US91/01101 `2~7~
The application of the ~matching principle~ to final providers of funds requires that the characteristics OI the financial instruments in which provid-ers of funds invest should be matche~ as closely as possible to ~lle cllaracteris-tics of the liabilities which the providers are funding.
The liabilities that the final providers of funds or their agents are fund-ing include retirement, future educational expenses, and possib~e future medi-cal expenses. All of these liabili~ies are ~Real~ liabilities - i.e., tlley are mucll more accurately defined in ~erms of constant dollars than in terms of nominal dollars because constan~ dollars are not affected by unknown future inflation.
Therefore, application of the ~matching principle~ to the final providers of funds requires that they fund their ~Real~ liabilities with constant-dollar financial instruments.
Financial intermediaries stand between the final users of funds and the final providers of funds. Financial intermediaries provide most of the funds utilized by final users of funds and use most-of the funds provided by final providers of funds. The final users of funds, the final providers of funds, and financial intermediaries, taken together, make up the general financial sys-tem of the economy.
The ~matching principle~ also applies to f~nancial intermediaries. They must match the characteristics of their assets (the securities issued by fin~l users of funds) to the characteristics of their liabilities ~the securities thatfinancial intermediaries issue to final providers of funds). The application of - the "matching principle~' to the financial system of the economy requires that all of the participants - the final users of funds, the final providers of funds, and the financial intermediaries - all utilize constant~ollar financial instruments.
However, constant~ollar financial instruments are not consistent with present legal and tax statutes. If constant~ollar financial instruments are to be utilized to achieve the benefits that they make possible through effective utilization of the matching principle, then a process is required to transform any desired constant~ollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
SUMMARY OF T~ INVENTION
`~/ The present invention involves the application of the "rnatching princi-ple" to a proce~s for converting a specific constant-dollar financial ' ' ''''` ~, , ' `, ~ ., ' " ;.
. ~ ~ . .
.. . . :
207~
instrument (whose primary components have been specified in a mannér con-sistent with an optimal match), into an equivalent financial instrument defined in terms of the nominal-dollars of ordinary commerce, and therefore consLstent with existing legal and tax statutes. The "matching principle"
involves matching the characteristics of financing instruments to the financ-ing needs of the users of funds and/or matching ~he characteristics of tl~e financial instruments to the investment needs of the providers of funds.
Because of the impact of uncertain and unknowable future inflation. nominal-dollar financial instruments do not allow an effective utilization of the matching principle for either final users or final providers of funds. Effectiveapplication of the matching principle requires the general utilization of constant-dollar financial instruments throughout the financial system -- b-financial intermediaries as well as by final users and providers of funds. The benefits of the effective application of the matching principle that can be realized only by the utilization of constant-dollar financial irLcitruments are measured by the shift in the market risk/return tradeoff faced by the final users and providers of funds. The utilization of constant-dollar financial instruments 3110WS both final users an~ final providers of funds to achieve both higher expected returns and lower risks.
According to the present invention, this process begins with constant-dollar financial instruments that effectively implement the matching princi-ple and the conversion factors to be used to convert the desired constant-dol-lar financial instrument into an equivalènt nominal-dollar financial instru-ment. The conversion factors to be specified include:
l. The measure of inflation (e.g., price index) to be utilized for the conversion of corLitant-dol-lars into nominal-dollars.
A SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR CONVERTING
CONSTANT DOLLAR FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
BACK~ROUND O~ THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a system and process for specifying a constant-dollar financial instrument and then, step-by-step~ primary component-by-primary component, ~ransforming the desired constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
In the prior art, there is disclosed processes for specif~ing a nominal-dollar financial instrument and then adJusting the nominal-dollar financial instrument (in varying degrees) for the impact of inflation. However. such prior art type processec do not achieve the advantages of the present inven-tion. The constant-dollar firlancial instrument of the present invention make use of the l~matching principle~ as will be discussed below.
Constant dollar financial instruments are financial instruments whose primary components are defined in terms of constant-dollars. Constant dol-lars are nominal-dollars, ~the dollars of ordinary commerce), adjusted by the use of a price index, thereby eliminating the impact o inflation on the pur-chasing power or the dollar (i.e., constant-dollars are dollars with constant purchasing power as opposed to constant face value). Nominal dollars are dollars having a constant face value. For example, a olle dollar bill is a nominal~ollar. However, two years from now that one dollar, given tlle effects of inflation, will have a purchasing power of less than one dollar.
The inventors of the present invention have established that the appli-cation of the l~matching principle~ requires the general utilization of constant-dollar financial instruments by providers ~nd users of funds tllrough-out the financial system, The "matching principle~ is a fundamentaî principle in the area of j~
applied finance that has ~een the su~ect of very little academic research. It applies to both users and providers of funds.
.
,, , -, ' ,,~
.. .. ..
., , , , . ., .. ~ . "
WO 91t13409 PCr/US91/01101 ~7~6~ 2-For users of funds, the application of the ~'matching principle~' requires that the characteristics of the financial instruments issued by the user of funds should be matched as closely as possible to the characteristics of the investments being financed by the user of funds. For providers of funds, tlle application of the "matching principle" requires that the characteristics of the financial instrument in which a provider of funds invests sllould be matched as closely as possible to the characteristics of the liabilities being funded by the provider of funds.
Final users of funds invest in the real productive capital (e.g.. plant and equipment, commercial real estate, social infrastructure, etc.) of the econ-omy. These "Real" assets have expected income streams and expected depre-ciation schedules that are most accurately described in terms of constant dol-lars as opposed to nominal dollars. This is because their future income streams and depreciation schedules as measured in nominal dollars will vary with unlcnown future inflation rates, but this variation is eliminated by utiliz-ing constant dollars which are unaffected by future inflation.
The application of the "matching principle" to final users of funds requires that the payment schedule of the instrument match the time pattern of tlle income stream of the asset ~eing financed and that the amortization schedule of the instrualent match the depreciation schedule of the asset being financed. Since both the income stream and the depreciation schedules of the assets being financed are most accurately defined in terms of constant dollars.
both the paymen~ and amortiza~ion schedules of the financial instrument must also be defined in terms of constant dollars. Mathematical consistency then requires ~hat the rate of return must also be defined in terms of constant dol-lars. Therefore, application of the matching principle requires that final users of funds utilize cons~ant~ollar financial instruments to finance their investments in real assets.
Final providers of funds are the actual savers in the economy or their agents. The a~tual savers in the economy are those who choose to forgo con-5urnption in order to save - i.e., the individual consumers in the economy. The agents of the actual savers are those institutions to whom individual consum-ers have delega~ed some part of their saving activity. Pension funds are tl~e largest and fastest growing agents of aetual savers. Pension funds are also the largest and fastest growing source of long-term funds in the economy.
WO 91t13409 PCI/US91/01101 `2~7~
The application of the ~matching principle~ to final providers of funds requires that the characteristics OI the financial instruments in which provid-ers of funds invest should be matche~ as closely as possible to ~lle cllaracteris-tics of the liabilities which the providers are funding.
The liabilities that the final providers of funds or their agents are fund-ing include retirement, future educational expenses, and possib~e future medi-cal expenses. All of these liabili~ies are ~Real~ liabilities - i.e., tlley are mucll more accurately defined in ~erms of constant dollars than in terms of nominal dollars because constan~ dollars are not affected by unknown future inflation.
Therefore, application of the ~matching principle~ to the final providers of funds requires that they fund their ~Real~ liabilities with constant-dollar financial instruments.
Financial intermediaries stand between the final users of funds and the final providers of funds. Financial intermediaries provide most of the funds utilized by final users of funds and use most-of the funds provided by final providers of funds. The final users of funds, the final providers of funds, and financial intermediaries, taken together, make up the general financial sys-tem of the economy.
The ~matching principle~ also applies to f~nancial intermediaries. They must match the characteristics of their assets (the securities issued by fin~l users of funds) to the characteristics of their liabilities ~the securities thatfinancial intermediaries issue to final providers of funds). The application of - the "matching principle~' to the financial system of the economy requires that all of the participants - the final users of funds, the final providers of funds, and the financial intermediaries - all utilize constant~ollar financial instruments.
However, constant~ollar financial instruments are not consistent with present legal and tax statutes. If constant~ollar financial instruments are to be utilized to achieve the benefits that they make possible through effective utilization of the matching principle, then a process is required to transform any desired constant~ollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
SUMMARY OF T~ INVENTION
`~/ The present invention involves the application of the "rnatching princi-ple" to a proce~s for converting a specific constant-dollar financial ' ' ''''` ~, , ' `, ~ ., ' " ;.
. ~ ~ . .
.. . . :
207~
instrument (whose primary components have been specified in a mannér con-sistent with an optimal match), into an equivalent financial instrument defined in terms of the nominal-dollars of ordinary commerce, and therefore consLstent with existing legal and tax statutes. The "matching principle"
involves matching the characteristics of financing instruments to the financ-ing needs of the users of funds and/or matching ~he characteristics of tl~e financial instruments to the investment needs of the providers of funds.
Because of the impact of uncertain and unknowable future inflation. nominal-dollar financial instruments do not allow an effective utilization of the matching principle for either final users or final providers of funds. Effectiveapplication of the matching principle requires the general utilization of constant-dollar financial instruments throughout the financial system -- b-financial intermediaries as well as by final users and providers of funds. The benefits of the effective application of the matching principle that can be realized only by the utilization of constant-dollar financial irLcitruments are measured by the shift in the market risk/return tradeoff faced by the final users and providers of funds. The utilization of constant-dollar financial instruments 3110WS both final users an~ final providers of funds to achieve both higher expected returns and lower risks.
According to the present invention, this process begins with constant-dollar financial instruments that effectively implement the matching princi-ple and the conversion factors to be used to convert the desired constant-dol-lar financial instrument into an equivalènt nominal-dollar financial instru-ment. The conversion factors to be specified include:
l. The measure of inflation (e.g., price index) to be utilized for the conversion of corLitant-dol-lars into nominal-dollars.
2. The base period for conversion.
3. The frequen~y with which nominal-dollar val-ues would be adjusted for inflation.
The present invention converts the primary components of the desired constant~ollar financial instrument into standard form. Con-version of the constant~ollar financial instrum2nt into standard form is the process of converting each of the primary components into a standard form, where the standard form of each component is a matter ~`' ' .
-: ~, .: . .. ., , , , . , : :,:, " ; . :
WO 91/13409 pcr/us9l/o1 2~7~96~
of the particular conventions built into the particular processing system.
For e~cample, interest rate or rate of return must be defined in terms of a particular convention. Generally, ~as assumed in the equa-tions), the convention will be to express rates of return as effective annual rates of return with annual compounding - which is the speci-fied rate of return measure under federal truth-in-lending statutes.
Payment schedules and amor~ization schedules will be converted into arrays, where the elements in the arrays are either constant-dollar amounts or functions of constant-dollar amounts. For payment sched-ules, the number of elements in the array will equal the number of pay-ment periods or the number of adjustment periods, whichever is greater (if the number of adjustment periods exceeds the number of payment periods, then some elements in ehe pay~er~t array will be zero to reflect adjustment periods when there is no scheduled payment).
The number of elements in amortization arrays will equal the number of payment periods or the number of adjustment periods, whichever is greater, plus one. The first element in the amortization array will be tlle initial loan balance.
The terms and covenants will be converted into a standard array of terms and covenants. This array will be defined in such a way as to include all normal terms and covenants for a broad variety of ~`
instruments. ~ ~
The s~stem further defines a measure of the inflation rate con- r sistent with the standard form for specifying the rate of return, (for example, the effective annual rate), utilizing this specified inflation measure. The system generates the specification of each of the pri-mary components of the equivalent nominal~ollar financial instrument in terms of nominal~ollars and the specified measure of inflation. The system outputs the specifications of each of the primary components of the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument ila a format consi~
tent with tlle preparation of legal documents. When the loan is closed and funded, (or the securities are ~ssued and funds are released from escrow), the actual transaction data and inflation da~a are entered into the system and updated regularly. The system performs all loan .
. .,, ,~ . : . ., ....... . 1'. .
. . ~ . . . --.~ .,: ~. . .. . .
WO 91/13 O Pcr/us91/otlol ~76965 -6 -servicing function, generating current data for all primary components of the financial instrument in nominal-dollars and updating these fig-ures with every inflation adjustment period and every payment perio~.
and with every paymen~ received (including accrued interest, late pa--ment penalty, etc.).
BREF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a flow chart illustrating the principles of the present invention concerning conversion of instruments.
Figure 2 is a flow chart illustrating the principles of the present invention concerning servicing financial instruments.
Figures 3-5 are spreadsheets which show the advantages of the present invention under different inflation scenarios.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVEN~ION
The data processing system for carrying out the present inven-tion generally comprises three components - an input device. a pro-cessing device and an output device. The input device comprises a mechanism for entering the primary components (specified below) of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument, the specified measure of inflation, the base period, and the frequency of adjustment for infla-tion to be utilized in the conversion process. The input device may also include a mechan~sm for entering the actual payment records, inflation data and other data required to service the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instruments generated by the system.
The processing device transforms the primary components of the constant-dollar financial instrument into standard form; defines a measure of the inflation rate; uses the specified inflation measure, con-sistent with the standard measure for the rate of return (e.g., the effective annual rate of interest) and generates the equivalent nominal~ollar specification of each of ~he primary components of t~le desired constant~ollar financial instrument in terms of nominal-dollars and inflation rates given the frequency of adjustment for inflation and the base period. The processing unit also calculates the current nominal-dollar return, the current interest (and penalties, if any~ due, the amount of the payment being utilized for payment of current inter-est (and penalties, if any), the change in accrued interest from the .
- -i - . - . :. . . , :
. . ~ , ; . . . -: , . ~ . . . . . .
2 ~ 7 ~
prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued inter-est, if any, the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior pa~yment period, and the new loan balance, the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period, the required payment for the subse-quent payment period. The processing unit also checks all loan terms and covenants against the latest inputted data for compliance of the loan with all terms and covenants.
The output device prints out the specifications of each of tlle three components of the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instru-ment in a format consistent with preparation of promissory notes and other legal documents.
The output device also prints out the current nominal-dollar return, the current interest (and penalties, if any) due, the payment amount and the amount of thé payment being utilized for payment of current interest (and penalties, if any), the change in the amount of accrued interest from the prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued interest~ if any, the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period, and the current loan bal-ance, a list of the loan terms and/or covenants, if any, with which the r loan is not currently in compliance, and the supporting data therefor, all current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower, the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment payment period and the required payment for the subsequent payment period.
Selection and definition o~ the desired constant dollar finan~ial ins~rumerlt Possible types of constant-dollar financial instruments include, but are not limited to bonds of all types, including mortgage bonds.
debentures, subordinated debentures, and capital notes; mortgages and deeds of trust of all types9 loans of all types, leases of all types, promis-sory notes of all types, life insurance policies and an}luities, investment company shares and deposits and certificates of deposit.
Selection OI the proper type of constant~ollar financial instru-ment depends on the function of the instrument, the bus~ness activities of the issuer of the instrument, and the type of assets to ~e financed by the instruments.
-, - :. :,, wo 91/13409 Pcr/us91/
2~7~
Definition of the desired constant-dGllar financial instrument is a matter of specifying the primary components of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument.
The primary components of constant-dollar financial instru-ments may comprise: the rate of return or rate of interest, the pay-ment schedule, the amortization scheduie, the loan terms and cove-nants. The rate of return is a ~Real,~ or purchasing power rate of return because it is defined in terms of constant-dollars. The constant-dollar rate of return may be either fixed or variable. If the constant-dollar rate of return is variable, it will be a function of some set of constant-dollar variables - e.g., some fixed constant-dollar rate of return plus some share of constant-dollar revenues. The payment schedule is defined in terms of constant-dollars. If the constant-dollar rate of return is fixed, then there will be a fixed relationship between a fixed constant-dollar payment schedule and a fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule based on the fixed constant-dollar rate of return.
If the constant-dollar rate of return is variable and the constant-dollar amortization schedule is fixed, then ~he constant-dollar pa~ment schedule will be variable because it is a function of the fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule and the variable constant-dollar rate of return. The amortization schedule is defined in terms of constant-dol-lars. If the constant~ollar rate of return is variable and the constant-dollar payment amounts are fixed, then the constant-dollar amortiza-tion schedule (and the maturity ~f the instrument) will be variable because it is a function of the fixed constant-dollar payments and the variable constant-dollar rate of return. All loan terms and covenants involving dollar amounts ~e.g., minimum amount of net working capital to be maintained by the borrower) are defined in terrns of constant-dollars.
Gains to both providers and users of funds are maximized by utilizing the "matching principle" (see Background of the Invention) to define the constant-~ollar payment and amortization schedules. As demonstrated in ~he Background of Invention section, app'ication of the "matching principle" requir~s that the payment and amortization schedules be defined in terms of constant-dollars. If the payment and . ", . . , : . ~.
_ g 2 ~ 7 6 9 ~ ~
amortization schedules are defined in terms of constant-dollars, then mathematical consistency requires that the rate of return or rate of interest also be defined in terms of constant-dollars. As a general rule, low and moderate risk constant-dollar financial instruments will have fixed constant-dollar returns or rates of interest - variable constant-dollar returns or rates of interest will generally be utilized only for higher r~sk instruments.
Conversion of the desired constant{3ollar financial instruments into equivalent nominal~ollar ~inancial instruments The desired constant~ollar financial instruments must be con-verted into equivalent nominal-dollar financial instruments to achieve consistency with existing legal and tax statutes.
- The first step in the conversion process (see-Figure 1) ~s to enter r into the data processing system the definition of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument (i.e., the specifications of the primary com-ponents of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument), the speci-fied measure of inflation, the base period7 and frequency of adjustment for inflation to be utilized (step 101).
If the constant~ollar rate of return is variable, then either the constant-dollar amortization schedule will be fixed and the constant-dollar payment schedule will be a function of the fixed amor-tization schedule and the variable constant-dollar rate of return, or the constant-dollar payments will be fixed and the constant-dollar amorti-zation schedule will be a function o~ the fixed constant-dollar pay-ments and the variable constant~ollar rate of return.
The processing unit first transforms the primary components of the desired constant~ollar financial instrument into standard form (step 102). The constant~ollar rate of return or interest rate specifi-cation is put into a standard form such as an effective annual rate of return. If the rate of return is not specified as a true interest rate (e.g., if it is specified as a discount rate of interest), it is converted to a true interest rate specification. If the rate of return is not specified on an annual basis (e.g., a monthly rate of return), it is converted to an annual basis. The final step is to convert to a standard compounding .. , . ~ : , , W O 91/13409 PC~rtVS9t/01101 2~76~
period such as annual compounding for effective annual rates of return~
semi-annual îor bond-equivalent yields, etc.
The payment and amortization schedules are transformed into standard arrays - which is transformed first depends on whether the constant-dollar rate of return is fixed, and if not, whether or not the amortization schedule is fixed. To do this, the processing unit deter-mines whether there is a fixed constant-dollar rate of return (step 103).
If it is fixed, the payment schedule is transformed into standard form (step lOS). If the constant-dollar rate of return is not f~xed, it is deter-mined whether there are variable constant-dollar payments (step 104).
If not. the payment schedule is transformed into standard form (step 10~. If there are variable constant-dollar payments, the amortization schedule is transformed into standard form (step 106). If the payment schedule was transformed in~o standard form in step 105. then the àmortization schedule is transformed into standard form in step 10,. If the amortization schedule was transformed in step 106, the payment schedule is transformed into standard form in step 108.
In either case, after step 107 or 108, all terms and covenants are put into standard form (step 109).
The processing unit then defines a measure of the inflation rate consistent with the standardized ratei of return (eg., the effective annual rate of inflation) utilizing the specified inflation measure and base period (step 110).
After the processing unit has put the primary components of tl e desired constant-dollar financial instrument into standardized form and defined the inflation measure, it converts all of the primary compo-nents into equivalent nominal-dollar components, thus creating an equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument (steps 111-119).
The equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate, rt, ~or every adjust-ment period t is defined as a function of the measure of inflation, It, for that adjustment period t; and the constant-dollar rate of return, Rt, for adjustment period t (step 111).
rt (1 Rt) (1 It) t = 1,...,y " n (equation 1) , . , ~ ~ , , . :
- , , ,~ :
wo 91/t340~ Pcl/Us91/ollo1 2~7~9~
To cc)nvert the constant-dollar payment and amortization scl~ed-ules into equivalent nominal-dollar schedules, the first step ~s to deter-mine whether or not the constant-dollar rate of return is fixed (step 112). If the cons~ant-dollar rate of return is fixed, the next step is to determine whether or not the constant-dollar payments are fixed and tlle number of payment periods exceeds the number adjustment periods ~`
(e.g., a constant-dollar mortgage with monthly payments and annual adjustments for inflation (step 113). r II either the constant-dollar payments are not fixed or the num-ber of adjustment periods is equal to or greater than the number of paymènt periods, then the equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule is determined according to step 115.
If the constant-dollar payments are fixed and the number of payment periods is greater than the numbér of adjustment periods, then equivalent nominal-dollar payments are generated which are constant (in nominal dollars) within adjustment periods (step 114).
lf the constant-dollar rate of return is not constant (step 112~, the next step is to determine whether or not the amortization schedule is fixed (step 113a~. If the amortization schedule is fixed, then tl~e constant-dollar payment schedule will vary with the variable constant-dollar rate of the return, and the ne*t step (step 11G) is to generate the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule.
If the amortization schedule varies with the variable constant-dollar rate of return and the constant-dollar payments are fixed (step 113a), then the next s~ep is to determine the equivalent nominal~ollar payments according to step 115.
If the payment schedule is generated in steps 114 or 115, the nominal~ollar amortization schedule is generated (step 11~). If the nominal~ollar amortization schedule was generated in step 116, then the nominal~ollar payment schedule is generated ~step 118).
The system then searches the terms and covenants for any num-bers defined in constant-dollars and redefines them as equivalent nominal~ollars for every ad~ustment period t (step 119).
The system goes through the array of terms and covenants searching for conditions expressed in terms of constant dollars.
. . , . : , , , , , "
- . . . . . .
:..~ , ,. . .. . ; :.
, ~ , . : , .
WO ~1/13409 PCI/US9l/1)1l01 2~769~
Whenever the system finds conditions expressed in terms of constant dollars, the system redefines the conditions in equivalent nominal-dollar terms for each adjustment period, utilizing the measure of the inflation rate for all adjustment periods up to and including that adjustment period. The equivalent nominal-dollar amount ls defined by an equation similar to equation 2 (below), where Pt would be replaced by the constant-dollar amount from the term or covenant and Pt would become the nominal-dollar equivalent ~or each adjustment period.
The system then defines the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument by printing out primary components in equivalent nominal-dollar form in a format consistent with the preparation of notes and other legal documents (step 120).
Referring to step 115, if the number of payments per year. x. ~s equal to the number of inflation adjustments per year. y, then ~he equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule is defined as follows:
Pt P t Tr' ( 1 + I; ) /Y
t = 1, ..., y " n (equation 2) In equation 2, Pt i5 the equivalent nominal-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Pt is the constant-dollar payment in adjustment period t; li is the inflation rate in adjustment period i; and n is the maturity of the instrument in years. I
There will not be a case in which x is less than y because the initial standardization routine defines a constant-dollar payment of zero constant-dollars for every adjustment period without a scheduled payment.
Referring to step 114, if, as will commonly be the case for mort-gages and term loans, the constant-dollar instrument is fully amortlzed over n years with equal constant-dollar payments x times per year (x =
12 for monthly payments), and the number of adjustments for inflation each year, y, is less than x ~y = 1 for annual adjustments and y = 2 for semi-annual ad~ustments), then the equivalent nominal~ollar payment schedule is defined as follows: t 1 / ~t x/y-i+1 =~- 1r (1+Ij) /Y~ation 3) t=l , . . . ,y .n i =l , . .; x/y , : -: ~ : ,: .. - , .-.. ~ ~ ' :' ' '':','i,' : ' ' , . . . ... .
WO ~1/13409 PCr/US91/01101 - ~ ~ 7 ~
....;
In equation 3, Pt*x/y-i+1, i = 1,...,x/y, are the x/y equal nominal-dollar payments in adjustment period t; Bo iS the original amount borrowed in constant-dollars: R Is tlle fixed constant-dollar rate of return; Ij is tl~e inflation rate for period j; and rt is the equiva-lent nominal-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
After the system has defined the equivalent nominal-dollar pay-ment schedule according to the above (steps 114 or 115), it defines the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule as follows (step 117):
l/x bt bt-l (1 + rt) - Pt t = 1,.."x " n (equatlon 4) In equation 4, bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance in period t; rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate in period t;
and Pt is the nominal-dollar loan payment in period t.
If the desired constant-dollar financial instrument has a variable constant-dollar rate of return and a fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule, then the instrument will have a variable constant-dollar pay-ment schedule.
In the case of a variable constant-dollar payment schedule, the system defines the eguivalent nominal-dollar amortizaeion schedule (step 116) before defining the equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule (step 118).
In the case of a variable constant~ollar payment scheduie, the equivalent nom~nal~ollar amortization schedule ~step 116~ is defined as follows: t b =B . ~ (l+I . )1/X; t=l, . . . ,x.n t t ~ (equatlon 5) In equation 5, bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance for period t; Bt is the scheduled constant-dollar loan balance for period t:
and li is the inflation rate for period i.
The equivalent nominal~ollar payment schedule (step 118) is then defined ais follows:
l/x Pt ~ rt) ~ bt 1 -bt t = 1,..., x ~I n (equation 6) . ; - .: .. . . . - : :; ... . :, ~, :,.: . :.. :, .,, ,,.,. ,.. . . ;..... .
WO 91/t3409 PCI/US9t/Ot101 207~6~ ' In equation 6, Pt is the nominal-dollar paymen~ in period t: rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return in period t: and bt is the equivalent nominal-dollar loan balance in period t.
Senicin~ the equivalent nominal dollar financial instruments Implementation of the desired constant-dollar financial instru-ments requires a system that serviceS the equivalent nominal-dollar instruments after defining these instruments.
The equivalent nominal-dollar specifications of the primarv components of the desired constant-dollar instrument are the basis of servicing the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument as well as the defi-nition of the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
Therefore, ~he data processing system develops the basis of ser-vicing the equivalent nominal-dollar~ instruments when the system defines the equivalent nominal-dollar instruments.
The first step in the process of servicing the equivalent nominal-dollar instruments 3s to input ehe data on payments received and dates of receipt, inflation measures and other required data (step 2Ql).
Tlle system then calculates the current nominal-dollar interest rate according to the specification of the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return and calculates the current interest (and penalties, if any) given the inputted data and stored data from previous periods (step 202).
The system then calculates the current interest ~and penalties, if any), and the portion of the current payment that will go to pay cur-rent interest (and penalties, if any), the change in accrued interest from the prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued interest, if any (step 205).
The system next calculates the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior period, and the new loan balance (step 206).
The system then checks all loan terms and covenants against the latest inputted data ~or compliance o~ the loan with all terms and cov-enants (step 207t.
WO 91~13409 PCI'/US91/01101 -- l5 --2 ~ ,3 Compliance with the terms and covenantS is a matter of com-paring the current inputted data for each term or covenant with ~he requirements of the term or covenant. For example, is the property (in the case of a mortgage) currently insured as per the loan requirements?
Is the net working capital (in the case of corporate financing) currently equal to or greater than the required amount?
The system then calculates the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period according to the specification of the equiv-alent nominal-dollar return (step 208).
The system calculates ~he nominal-dollar return for the subse-quent payment period utilizing the inflation data for the period and equation 1).
Next, the system determines whether the instrument has a fixed constant-dollar rate of return (step 209). If it is determined in step 209 that there is a fixed constant-dollar rate of return or a variable constant-dollar return with fixed constant-dollar payments, the system calculates the nominal-dollar payment for the- subsequent payment period as per the equivalent nominal-dollar payment speci~ication (s~ep 210).
After calculating the specified equivalent nominal-dollar pay-ment for the su~seguent payment perio~ in step 210, the system then adds any unpaid amounts from previous payment periods (step 213) and any unpaid late payment penalties, if any, to obtain the total nominal-dollar paymen~ required for the subsequent payment period ~step 215).
If it is determined at step 209 that there is not a fixed constant-dollar rate of return, the processor determines if the instru-ment has a variable corlstant~ollar rate of return and a fixed amorti-zation schedule (steps 211). If so, the system first calculates the nominal~ollar amortization schedule for the subsequent payment period as per the eguivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule (step 212). Then the system calculates, in step 214, the required nominai-dollar payment for the subsequent payment period, given the curren2 loan balance, the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return for tlle su~
sequent period and the specified nominal-dollar loan amortization cal-culated in step 212. Next, late payment penalties, if any. are .. - . . . . ,; ,. , i ,: , . . :
WO 91/13409 P~/US91/0111)1 2~7~9~ `
calculated and added to the amount determined in step 214 to obtain the total amount of the nominal-dollar payment for the subsequent period (step 215).
In step 216, the system prints out, in a desired format. the fol-lowing items:
l. The current nominal-dollar rate of return.
2. The current interest (and penaleies, if any) due.
3. The payment amount and the amount of the paYment being utilized for payment of current inlerest (an~ penal-ties, if any).
. The change in the amount of accrued interest from tlle prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued interest, if any.
5. The change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period, and the current loan balance.
6. A list of the loan terms and/or covenants, if any, with which the loan is not currently in compliance, and the supporting data therefor.
7. All current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower.
8. The equivalent nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period.
9. The required payment for the subsequent payment period.
Gains from emPlo~ the invention As discussed in the background of the invention section, the gains from employ~ng the invention are based on the application of the "matching principle." The inventors have established that significant gains--as compared to the utilization of conventional nominal-dollar instruments -- result when the invention is used to implement constant-dollar instruments specified according to the "matching prihciple."
In order to highlight some of the advantages of the present invention over conventional mortgages, three spreadsheets are included in tl~e drawings as Figures 3, 4 and 5. Each of the sample spreadsheets - 17 ~ i 9 S
, assumes a $10,000,000 purchase price, a $7.500,000 loan. $900,000 of net operating income (NOI) at time of purchase, a capitalization (CAP) rate at purchase of 9.009~ and a market CAP rate of 9.009~. In Figure 3. a steady inflation rate of 4.00% is assumed. In Figure 4, an initial inflation rate of 4.009~ ~ used but a drop to 2.00% is used beginning year 2. In Figure 5, an inflation rate of 4.00% initially is changed to 6.
8 and finally l0.00~.
These scenarios exemplify the advantages of the present inven-tion in increasing the expected rate of return for final users of funds (Figure 3, the steady inflation scenario, which is the expected scenario) and in simultaneously reducing their risk by reducing the impact of unknown future inflation on expected returns (Figures 3, 4 and 5 with steady, falling and rising inflation scenarios respectively).
The Figures also demonstrate the reduction in default risk as measured by minimum interest coverage ratios and the high ~'Real" (net of inflation) returns that the present invention makes possible for final providers of funds. Even after expenses of servicing the loans and managing the portfolio of investments, final providers can expect "Real~ returns in excess of 4% from a portfolio of high quality 5C~6 RealValueT~ instruments.
For final providers of funds (households) and their agents (espe-cially pension funds), the availability of the instruments made possible by the invention would significantly increase their expected returns and lower their risks.
The invention will allow providers of funds to more ~han double their expected "Real~ returns as compared to high quality nominal-dol-lar debt instruments. Providers of funds can expect "Real" (net of inflation) reeurns in excess of 4% from investments in high quality, low default risk Real ValuerM (i.e" equivalent nominal-dollar instruments produced by the invention) securities.
This is over twice ~he long-term average ~Real~ return achieved by investing in high quality corporate bonds as computed by Ibbotson and Sinquefield for the period 1926-1977 and extended by Ibbotson eo 1985.
, ~ " , . .
- . .. . .. . : . .. . .......
,: , ;, .. . ~ . , . . . ... ,,,.. ,, ., .: .. . .
: ,, - ~ "
WO 91/134l)9 PCI/US91/01101 6~ ~
The invention will allow providers of funds to reduce all of their components of risk at the same time that they are increasing their e~cpected returns.
Default risk will be significantly reduced because debt coverage ratios will rise significantly (see columns h and i of the spreadsheets).
Market risk, which is largely interest rate risk in the case of high quality debt instruments, will be greatly reduced because "Real,"
or constant-dollar interest rates are rnuch less variable than are nominal-dollar interest rates.
The single most important measure of risk for providers of funds -- the standard deviation of the "Real" rate of return -- will be reduced to less than one percent for portfolios of high quali~y RealValue~M instruments, making RealValue~ instruments much ~ess . .
risky than Treasury Bills by this key measure of risk.
Portfolio risk will be reduced because the returns on RealValue instruments will be uncorrelated with the returns on other investments.
Currency risk will be reduced for international investors because constant-currency instruments will eliminate the major factor in long-term currenoy risk--differential inflation ratesO
- Final users of funds will enjoy significantly higher expected returns and lower risk as a result of the availability of the instruments made possible by the invention.
The higher returns and lower risk are the result of the superior matches between debt service and income made possible by the inven-tion and the (related) superior match between amortiza~ion and the value of assets being financed.
De~t coverage ratios are higher and more stable (default risk is an increasing function of the lowest debt coverage ratios expected over the life of the loan), reducing default risk significantly (see columns h and i of the spreadsheets).
Users of funds are able to maintain higher average leverage (see columns u and v of the spreadsheets), increasing their expected returns, at the same time that default risk is reduced through higher debt coverage ratios.
.
Wo 91/13409 PCr/US91/01101 -19- 2~769~;3 In the s~able inflation scenario (Spreadsheet l), the result is a more than 30% increase (from 11.16% to 14.60%) in the expected "Real" after-tax return to the final user of funds in the stable inflation case.
RealValue"l financing increases its expected return advantage in the case of falling inflation (Spreadsheet 2) and maintains a reduced e~cpec~ed return advantage in the case of sharply rising inflation tSpreadsheet 3).
RealValue'M financ~ng reduces the infla~ion risk faced by final users of funds because it reduces the variation in their expected "Real"
after-tax returns caused by variations in inflation (see Spreadsheets l.
2 and 3) this lower "Real" risk is the result of the fixed "Real" r~te of interest.
~lariations This invention is applicable to instruments denominated in any currency.
At any point where the word "dollar" appears, any currency name (e.g., marks, francs, pounds, etc.) may be substituted.
The invention makes possible the general utilization of constant-currency financial instruments in any country with any currency.
What has been described by the foregoing is preferred embodi-ment of the preserit invention. Various modifications can be made and will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. The inven-tion is limited only by the claims appended hereto.
The present invention converts the primary components of the desired constant~ollar financial instrument into standard form. Con-version of the constant~ollar financial instrum2nt into standard form is the process of converting each of the primary components into a standard form, where the standard form of each component is a matter ~`' ' .
-: ~, .: . .. ., , , , . , : :,:, " ; . :
WO 91/13409 pcr/us9l/o1 2~7~96~
of the particular conventions built into the particular processing system.
For e~cample, interest rate or rate of return must be defined in terms of a particular convention. Generally, ~as assumed in the equa-tions), the convention will be to express rates of return as effective annual rates of return with annual compounding - which is the speci-fied rate of return measure under federal truth-in-lending statutes.
Payment schedules and amor~ization schedules will be converted into arrays, where the elements in the arrays are either constant-dollar amounts or functions of constant-dollar amounts. For payment sched-ules, the number of elements in the array will equal the number of pay-ment periods or the number of adjustment periods, whichever is greater (if the number of adjustment periods exceeds the number of payment periods, then some elements in ehe pay~er~t array will be zero to reflect adjustment periods when there is no scheduled payment).
The number of elements in amortization arrays will equal the number of payment periods or the number of adjustment periods, whichever is greater, plus one. The first element in the amortization array will be tlle initial loan balance.
The terms and covenants will be converted into a standard array of terms and covenants. This array will be defined in such a way as to include all normal terms and covenants for a broad variety of ~`
instruments. ~ ~
The s~stem further defines a measure of the inflation rate con- r sistent with the standard form for specifying the rate of return, (for example, the effective annual rate), utilizing this specified inflation measure. The system generates the specification of each of the pri-mary components of the equivalent nominal~ollar financial instrument in terms of nominal~ollars and the specified measure of inflation. The system outputs the specifications of each of the primary components of the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument ila a format consi~
tent with tlle preparation of legal documents. When the loan is closed and funded, (or the securities are ~ssued and funds are released from escrow), the actual transaction data and inflation da~a are entered into the system and updated regularly. The system performs all loan .
. .,, ,~ . : . ., ....... . 1'. .
. . ~ . . . --.~ .,: ~. . .. . .
WO 91/13 O Pcr/us91/otlol ~76965 -6 -servicing function, generating current data for all primary components of the financial instrument in nominal-dollars and updating these fig-ures with every inflation adjustment period and every payment perio~.
and with every paymen~ received (including accrued interest, late pa--ment penalty, etc.).
BREF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Figure 1 is a flow chart illustrating the principles of the present invention concerning conversion of instruments.
Figure 2 is a flow chart illustrating the principles of the present invention concerning servicing financial instruments.
Figures 3-5 are spreadsheets which show the advantages of the present invention under different inflation scenarios.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVEN~ION
The data processing system for carrying out the present inven-tion generally comprises three components - an input device. a pro-cessing device and an output device. The input device comprises a mechanism for entering the primary components (specified below) of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument, the specified measure of inflation, the base period, and the frequency of adjustment for infla-tion to be utilized in the conversion process. The input device may also include a mechan~sm for entering the actual payment records, inflation data and other data required to service the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instruments generated by the system.
The processing device transforms the primary components of the constant-dollar financial instrument into standard form; defines a measure of the inflation rate; uses the specified inflation measure, con-sistent with the standard measure for the rate of return (e.g., the effective annual rate of interest) and generates the equivalent nominal~ollar specification of each of ~he primary components of t~le desired constant~ollar financial instrument in terms of nominal-dollars and inflation rates given the frequency of adjustment for inflation and the base period. The processing unit also calculates the current nominal-dollar return, the current interest (and penalties, if any~ due, the amount of the payment being utilized for payment of current inter-est (and penalties, if any), the change in accrued interest from the .
- -i - . - . :. . . , :
. . ~ , ; . . . -: , . ~ . . . . . .
2 ~ 7 ~
prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued inter-est, if any, the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior pa~yment period, and the new loan balance, the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period, the required payment for the subse-quent payment period. The processing unit also checks all loan terms and covenants against the latest inputted data for compliance of the loan with all terms and covenants.
The output device prints out the specifications of each of tlle three components of the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instru-ment in a format consistent with preparation of promissory notes and other legal documents.
The output device also prints out the current nominal-dollar return, the current interest (and penalties, if any) due, the payment amount and the amount of thé payment being utilized for payment of current interest (and penalties, if any), the change in the amount of accrued interest from the prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued interest~ if any, the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period, and the current loan bal-ance, a list of the loan terms and/or covenants, if any, with which the r loan is not currently in compliance, and the supporting data therefor, all current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower, the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment payment period and the required payment for the subsequent payment period.
Selection and definition o~ the desired constant dollar finan~ial ins~rumerlt Possible types of constant-dollar financial instruments include, but are not limited to bonds of all types, including mortgage bonds.
debentures, subordinated debentures, and capital notes; mortgages and deeds of trust of all types9 loans of all types, leases of all types, promis-sory notes of all types, life insurance policies and an}luities, investment company shares and deposits and certificates of deposit.
Selection OI the proper type of constant~ollar financial instru-ment depends on the function of the instrument, the bus~ness activities of the issuer of the instrument, and the type of assets to ~e financed by the instruments.
-, - :. :,, wo 91/13409 Pcr/us91/
2~7~
Definition of the desired constant-dGllar financial instrument is a matter of specifying the primary components of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument.
The primary components of constant-dollar financial instru-ments may comprise: the rate of return or rate of interest, the pay-ment schedule, the amortization scheduie, the loan terms and cove-nants. The rate of return is a ~Real,~ or purchasing power rate of return because it is defined in terms of constant-dollars. The constant-dollar rate of return may be either fixed or variable. If the constant-dollar rate of return is variable, it will be a function of some set of constant-dollar variables - e.g., some fixed constant-dollar rate of return plus some share of constant-dollar revenues. The payment schedule is defined in terms of constant-dollars. If the constant-dollar rate of return is fixed, then there will be a fixed relationship between a fixed constant-dollar payment schedule and a fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule based on the fixed constant-dollar rate of return.
If the constant-dollar rate of return is variable and the constant-dollar amortization schedule is fixed, then ~he constant-dollar pa~ment schedule will be variable because it is a function of the fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule and the variable constant-dollar rate of return. The amortization schedule is defined in terms of constant-dol-lars. If the constant~ollar rate of return is variable and the constant-dollar payment amounts are fixed, then the constant-dollar amortiza-tion schedule (and the maturity ~f the instrument) will be variable because it is a function of the fixed constant-dollar payments and the variable constant-dollar rate of return. All loan terms and covenants involving dollar amounts ~e.g., minimum amount of net working capital to be maintained by the borrower) are defined in terrns of constant-dollars.
Gains to both providers and users of funds are maximized by utilizing the "matching principle" (see Background of the Invention) to define the constant-~ollar payment and amortization schedules. As demonstrated in ~he Background of Invention section, app'ication of the "matching principle" requir~s that the payment and amortization schedules be defined in terms of constant-dollars. If the payment and . ", . . , : . ~.
_ g 2 ~ 7 6 9 ~ ~
amortization schedules are defined in terms of constant-dollars, then mathematical consistency requires that the rate of return or rate of interest also be defined in terms of constant-dollars. As a general rule, low and moderate risk constant-dollar financial instruments will have fixed constant-dollar returns or rates of interest - variable constant-dollar returns or rates of interest will generally be utilized only for higher r~sk instruments.
Conversion of the desired constant{3ollar financial instruments into equivalent nominal~ollar ~inancial instruments The desired constant~ollar financial instruments must be con-verted into equivalent nominal-dollar financial instruments to achieve consistency with existing legal and tax statutes.
- The first step in the conversion process (see-Figure 1) ~s to enter r into the data processing system the definition of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument (i.e., the specifications of the primary com-ponents of the desired constant-dollar financial instrument), the speci-fied measure of inflation, the base period7 and frequency of adjustment for inflation to be utilized (step 101).
If the constant~ollar rate of return is variable, then either the constant-dollar amortization schedule will be fixed and the constant-dollar payment schedule will be a function of the fixed amor-tization schedule and the variable constant-dollar rate of return, or the constant-dollar payments will be fixed and the constant-dollar amorti-zation schedule will be a function o~ the fixed constant-dollar pay-ments and the variable constant~ollar rate of return.
The processing unit first transforms the primary components of the desired constant~ollar financial instrument into standard form (step 102). The constant~ollar rate of return or interest rate specifi-cation is put into a standard form such as an effective annual rate of return. If the rate of return is not specified as a true interest rate (e.g., if it is specified as a discount rate of interest), it is converted to a true interest rate specification. If the rate of return is not specified on an annual basis (e.g., a monthly rate of return), it is converted to an annual basis. The final step is to convert to a standard compounding .. , . ~ : , , W O 91/13409 PC~rtVS9t/01101 2~76~
period such as annual compounding for effective annual rates of return~
semi-annual îor bond-equivalent yields, etc.
The payment and amortization schedules are transformed into standard arrays - which is transformed first depends on whether the constant-dollar rate of return is fixed, and if not, whether or not the amortization schedule is fixed. To do this, the processing unit deter-mines whether there is a fixed constant-dollar rate of return (step 103).
If it is fixed, the payment schedule is transformed into standard form (step lOS). If the constant-dollar rate of return is not f~xed, it is deter-mined whether there are variable constant-dollar payments (step 104).
If not. the payment schedule is transformed into standard form (step 10~. If there are variable constant-dollar payments, the amortization schedule is transformed into standard form (step 106). If the payment schedule was transformed in~o standard form in step 105. then the àmortization schedule is transformed into standard form in step 10,. If the amortization schedule was transformed in step 106, the payment schedule is transformed into standard form in step 108.
In either case, after step 107 or 108, all terms and covenants are put into standard form (step 109).
The processing unit then defines a measure of the inflation rate consistent with the standardized ratei of return (eg., the effective annual rate of inflation) utilizing the specified inflation measure and base period (step 110).
After the processing unit has put the primary components of tl e desired constant-dollar financial instrument into standardized form and defined the inflation measure, it converts all of the primary compo-nents into equivalent nominal-dollar components, thus creating an equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument (steps 111-119).
The equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate, rt, ~or every adjust-ment period t is defined as a function of the measure of inflation, It, for that adjustment period t; and the constant-dollar rate of return, Rt, for adjustment period t (step 111).
rt (1 Rt) (1 It) t = 1,...,y " n (equation 1) , . , ~ ~ , , . :
- , , ,~ :
wo 91/t340~ Pcl/Us91/ollo1 2~7~9~
To cc)nvert the constant-dollar payment and amortization scl~ed-ules into equivalent nominal-dollar schedules, the first step ~s to deter-mine whether or not the constant-dollar rate of return is fixed (step 112). If the cons~ant-dollar rate of return is fixed, the next step is to determine whether or not the constant-dollar payments are fixed and tlle number of payment periods exceeds the number adjustment periods ~`
(e.g., a constant-dollar mortgage with monthly payments and annual adjustments for inflation (step 113). r II either the constant-dollar payments are not fixed or the num-ber of adjustment periods is equal to or greater than the number of paymènt periods, then the equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule is determined according to step 115.
If the constant-dollar payments are fixed and the number of payment periods is greater than the numbér of adjustment periods, then equivalent nominal-dollar payments are generated which are constant (in nominal dollars) within adjustment periods (step 114).
lf the constant-dollar rate of return is not constant (step 112~, the next step is to determine whether or not the amortization schedule is fixed (step 113a~. If the amortization schedule is fixed, then tl~e constant-dollar payment schedule will vary with the variable constant-dollar rate of the return, and the ne*t step (step 11G) is to generate the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule.
If the amortization schedule varies with the variable constant-dollar rate of return and the constant-dollar payments are fixed (step 113a), then the next s~ep is to determine the equivalent nominal~ollar payments according to step 115.
If the payment schedule is generated in steps 114 or 115, the nominal~ollar amortization schedule is generated (step 11~). If the nominal~ollar amortization schedule was generated in step 116, then the nominal~ollar payment schedule is generated ~step 118).
The system then searches the terms and covenants for any num-bers defined in constant-dollars and redefines them as equivalent nominal~ollars for every ad~ustment period t (step 119).
The system goes through the array of terms and covenants searching for conditions expressed in terms of constant dollars.
. . , . : , , , , , "
- . . . . . .
:..~ , ,. . .. . ; :.
, ~ , . : , .
WO ~1/13409 PCI/US9l/1)1l01 2~769~
Whenever the system finds conditions expressed in terms of constant dollars, the system redefines the conditions in equivalent nominal-dollar terms for each adjustment period, utilizing the measure of the inflation rate for all adjustment periods up to and including that adjustment period. The equivalent nominal-dollar amount ls defined by an equation similar to equation 2 (below), where Pt would be replaced by the constant-dollar amount from the term or covenant and Pt would become the nominal-dollar equivalent ~or each adjustment period.
The system then defines the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument by printing out primary components in equivalent nominal-dollar form in a format consistent with the preparation of notes and other legal documents (step 120).
Referring to step 115, if the number of payments per year. x. ~s equal to the number of inflation adjustments per year. y, then ~he equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule is defined as follows:
Pt P t Tr' ( 1 + I; ) /Y
t = 1, ..., y " n (equation 2) In equation 2, Pt i5 the equivalent nominal-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Pt is the constant-dollar payment in adjustment period t; li is the inflation rate in adjustment period i; and n is the maturity of the instrument in years. I
There will not be a case in which x is less than y because the initial standardization routine defines a constant-dollar payment of zero constant-dollars for every adjustment period without a scheduled payment.
Referring to step 114, if, as will commonly be the case for mort-gages and term loans, the constant-dollar instrument is fully amortlzed over n years with equal constant-dollar payments x times per year (x =
12 for monthly payments), and the number of adjustments for inflation each year, y, is less than x ~y = 1 for annual adjustments and y = 2 for semi-annual ad~ustments), then the equivalent nominal~ollar payment schedule is defined as follows: t 1 / ~t x/y-i+1 =~- 1r (1+Ij) /Y~ation 3) t=l , . . . ,y .n i =l , . .; x/y , : -: ~ : ,: .. - , .-.. ~ ~ ' :' ' '':','i,' : ' ' , . . . ... .
WO ~1/13409 PCr/US91/01101 - ~ ~ 7 ~
....;
In equation 3, Pt*x/y-i+1, i = 1,...,x/y, are the x/y equal nominal-dollar payments in adjustment period t; Bo iS the original amount borrowed in constant-dollars: R Is tlle fixed constant-dollar rate of return; Ij is tl~e inflation rate for period j; and rt is the equiva-lent nominal-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
After the system has defined the equivalent nominal-dollar pay-ment schedule according to the above (steps 114 or 115), it defines the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule as follows (step 117):
l/x bt bt-l (1 + rt) - Pt t = 1,.."x " n (equatlon 4) In equation 4, bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance in period t; rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate in period t;
and Pt is the nominal-dollar loan payment in period t.
If the desired constant-dollar financial instrument has a variable constant-dollar rate of return and a fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule, then the instrument will have a variable constant-dollar pay-ment schedule.
In the case of a variable constant-dollar payment schedule, the system defines the eguivalent nominal-dollar amortizaeion schedule (step 116) before defining the equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule (step 118).
In the case of a variable constant~ollar payment scheduie, the equivalent nom~nal~ollar amortization schedule ~step 116~ is defined as follows: t b =B . ~ (l+I . )1/X; t=l, . . . ,x.n t t ~ (equatlon 5) In equation 5, bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance for period t; Bt is the scheduled constant-dollar loan balance for period t:
and li is the inflation rate for period i.
The equivalent nominal~ollar payment schedule (step 118) is then defined ais follows:
l/x Pt ~ rt) ~ bt 1 -bt t = 1,..., x ~I n (equation 6) . ; - .: .. . . . - : :; ... . :, ~, :,.: . :.. :, .,, ,,.,. ,.. . . ;..... .
WO 91/t3409 PCI/US9t/Ot101 207~6~ ' In equation 6, Pt is the nominal-dollar paymen~ in period t: rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return in period t: and bt is the equivalent nominal-dollar loan balance in period t.
Senicin~ the equivalent nominal dollar financial instruments Implementation of the desired constant-dollar financial instru-ments requires a system that serviceS the equivalent nominal-dollar instruments after defining these instruments.
The equivalent nominal-dollar specifications of the primarv components of the desired constant-dollar instrument are the basis of servicing the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument as well as the defi-nition of the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
Therefore, ~he data processing system develops the basis of ser-vicing the equivalent nominal-dollar~ instruments when the system defines the equivalent nominal-dollar instruments.
The first step in the process of servicing the equivalent nominal-dollar instruments 3s to input ehe data on payments received and dates of receipt, inflation measures and other required data (step 2Ql).
Tlle system then calculates the current nominal-dollar interest rate according to the specification of the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return and calculates the current interest (and penalties, if any) given the inputted data and stored data from previous periods (step 202).
The system then calculates the current interest ~and penalties, if any), and the portion of the current payment that will go to pay cur-rent interest (and penalties, if any), the change in accrued interest from the prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued interest, if any (step 205).
The system next calculates the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior period, and the new loan balance (step 206).
The system then checks all loan terms and covenants against the latest inputted data ~or compliance o~ the loan with all terms and cov-enants (step 207t.
WO 91~13409 PCI'/US91/01101 -- l5 --2 ~ ,3 Compliance with the terms and covenantS is a matter of com-paring the current inputted data for each term or covenant with ~he requirements of the term or covenant. For example, is the property (in the case of a mortgage) currently insured as per the loan requirements?
Is the net working capital (in the case of corporate financing) currently equal to or greater than the required amount?
The system then calculates the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period according to the specification of the equiv-alent nominal-dollar return (step 208).
The system calculates ~he nominal-dollar return for the subse-quent payment period utilizing the inflation data for the period and equation 1).
Next, the system determines whether the instrument has a fixed constant-dollar rate of return (step 209). If it is determined in step 209 that there is a fixed constant-dollar rate of return or a variable constant-dollar return with fixed constant-dollar payments, the system calculates the nominal-dollar payment for the- subsequent payment period as per the equivalent nominal-dollar payment speci~ication (s~ep 210).
After calculating the specified equivalent nominal-dollar pay-ment for the su~seguent payment perio~ in step 210, the system then adds any unpaid amounts from previous payment periods (step 213) and any unpaid late payment penalties, if any, to obtain the total nominal-dollar paymen~ required for the subsequent payment period ~step 215).
If it is determined at step 209 that there is not a fixed constant-dollar rate of return, the processor determines if the instru-ment has a variable corlstant~ollar rate of return and a fixed amorti-zation schedule (steps 211). If so, the system first calculates the nominal~ollar amortization schedule for the subsequent payment period as per the eguivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule (step 212). Then the system calculates, in step 214, the required nominai-dollar payment for the subsequent payment period, given the curren2 loan balance, the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return for tlle su~
sequent period and the specified nominal-dollar loan amortization cal-culated in step 212. Next, late payment penalties, if any. are .. - . . . . ,; ,. , i ,: , . . :
WO 91/13409 P~/US91/0111)1 2~7~9~ `
calculated and added to the amount determined in step 214 to obtain the total amount of the nominal-dollar payment for the subsequent period (step 215).
In step 216, the system prints out, in a desired format. the fol-lowing items:
l. The current nominal-dollar rate of return.
2. The current interest (and penaleies, if any) due.
3. The payment amount and the amount of the paYment being utilized for payment of current inlerest (an~ penal-ties, if any).
. The change in the amount of accrued interest from tlle prior payment period, if applicable, and the new level of accrued interest, if any.
5. The change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period, and the current loan balance.
6. A list of the loan terms and/or covenants, if any, with which the loan is not currently in compliance, and the supporting data therefor.
7. All current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower.
8. The equivalent nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period.
9. The required payment for the subsequent payment period.
Gains from emPlo~ the invention As discussed in the background of the invention section, the gains from employ~ng the invention are based on the application of the "matching principle." The inventors have established that significant gains--as compared to the utilization of conventional nominal-dollar instruments -- result when the invention is used to implement constant-dollar instruments specified according to the "matching prihciple."
In order to highlight some of the advantages of the present invention over conventional mortgages, three spreadsheets are included in tl~e drawings as Figures 3, 4 and 5. Each of the sample spreadsheets - 17 ~ i 9 S
, assumes a $10,000,000 purchase price, a $7.500,000 loan. $900,000 of net operating income (NOI) at time of purchase, a capitalization (CAP) rate at purchase of 9.009~ and a market CAP rate of 9.009~. In Figure 3. a steady inflation rate of 4.00% is assumed. In Figure 4, an initial inflation rate of 4.009~ ~ used but a drop to 2.00% is used beginning year 2. In Figure 5, an inflation rate of 4.00% initially is changed to 6.
8 and finally l0.00~.
These scenarios exemplify the advantages of the present inven-tion in increasing the expected rate of return for final users of funds (Figure 3, the steady inflation scenario, which is the expected scenario) and in simultaneously reducing their risk by reducing the impact of unknown future inflation on expected returns (Figures 3, 4 and 5 with steady, falling and rising inflation scenarios respectively).
The Figures also demonstrate the reduction in default risk as measured by minimum interest coverage ratios and the high ~'Real" (net of inflation) returns that the present invention makes possible for final providers of funds. Even after expenses of servicing the loans and managing the portfolio of investments, final providers can expect "Real~ returns in excess of 4% from a portfolio of high quality 5C~6 RealValueT~ instruments.
For final providers of funds (households) and their agents (espe-cially pension funds), the availability of the instruments made possible by the invention would significantly increase their expected returns and lower their risks.
The invention will allow providers of funds to more ~han double their expected "Real~ returns as compared to high quality nominal-dol-lar debt instruments. Providers of funds can expect "Real" (net of inflation) reeurns in excess of 4% from investments in high quality, low default risk Real ValuerM (i.e" equivalent nominal-dollar instruments produced by the invention) securities.
This is over twice ~he long-term average ~Real~ return achieved by investing in high quality corporate bonds as computed by Ibbotson and Sinquefield for the period 1926-1977 and extended by Ibbotson eo 1985.
, ~ " , . .
- . .. . .. . : . .. . .......
,: , ;, .. . ~ . , . . . ... ,,,.. ,, ., .: .. . .
: ,, - ~ "
WO 91/134l)9 PCI/US91/01101 6~ ~
The invention will allow providers of funds to reduce all of their components of risk at the same time that they are increasing their e~cpected returns.
Default risk will be significantly reduced because debt coverage ratios will rise significantly (see columns h and i of the spreadsheets).
Market risk, which is largely interest rate risk in the case of high quality debt instruments, will be greatly reduced because "Real,"
or constant-dollar interest rates are rnuch less variable than are nominal-dollar interest rates.
The single most important measure of risk for providers of funds -- the standard deviation of the "Real" rate of return -- will be reduced to less than one percent for portfolios of high quali~y RealValue~M instruments, making RealValue~ instruments much ~ess . .
risky than Treasury Bills by this key measure of risk.
Portfolio risk will be reduced because the returns on RealValue instruments will be uncorrelated with the returns on other investments.
Currency risk will be reduced for international investors because constant-currency instruments will eliminate the major factor in long-term currenoy risk--differential inflation ratesO
- Final users of funds will enjoy significantly higher expected returns and lower risk as a result of the availability of the instruments made possible by the invention.
The higher returns and lower risk are the result of the superior matches between debt service and income made possible by the inven-tion and the (related) superior match between amortiza~ion and the value of assets being financed.
De~t coverage ratios are higher and more stable (default risk is an increasing function of the lowest debt coverage ratios expected over the life of the loan), reducing default risk significantly (see columns h and i of the spreadsheets).
Users of funds are able to maintain higher average leverage (see columns u and v of the spreadsheets), increasing their expected returns, at the same time that default risk is reduced through higher debt coverage ratios.
.
Wo 91/13409 PCr/US91/01101 -19- 2~769~;3 In the s~able inflation scenario (Spreadsheet l), the result is a more than 30% increase (from 11.16% to 14.60%) in the expected "Real" after-tax return to the final user of funds in the stable inflation case.
RealValue"l financing increases its expected return advantage in the case of falling inflation (Spreadsheet 2) and maintains a reduced e~cpec~ed return advantage in the case of sharply rising inflation tSpreadsheet 3).
RealValue'M financ~ng reduces the infla~ion risk faced by final users of funds because it reduces the variation in their expected "Real"
after-tax returns caused by variations in inflation (see Spreadsheets l.
2 and 3) this lower "Real" risk is the result of the fixed "Real" r~te of interest.
~lariations This invention is applicable to instruments denominated in any currency.
At any point where the word "dollar" appears, any currency name (e.g., marks, francs, pounds, etc.) may be substituted.
The invention makes possible the general utilization of constant-currency financial instruments in any country with any currency.
What has been described by the foregoing is preferred embodi-ment of the preserit invention. Various modifications can be made and will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art. The inven-tion is limited only by the claims appended hereto.
Claims (51)
1. An apparatus for converting a constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument comprising:
input means for inputting input data to specify a constant-dollar financial instrument;
converting means for converting the specified constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument; and output means for outputting output data relating to the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
input means for inputting input data to specify a constant-dollar financial instrument;
converting means for converting the specified constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument; and output means for outputting output data relating to the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein said input data com-prises the primary components of the specified constant-dollar finan-cial instrument, the measure of inflation to be used. the base period and the frequency of adjustment for inflation to be used by the con-verting means.
3. The apparatus of claim 1 further- comprising means for generating a constant-dollar payment schedule and a constant-dollar amortization schedule for the specified constant-dollar financial instrument.
4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein said converting means converts the specified constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument by calculating an equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate, converting the constant-dollar payment schedule into an equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule and deter-mining the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule.
5. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein said equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate, rt, is defined by the following formula:
rt=(1 + Rt)"(1 + It) - 1; for t = 1,...,y " n;
where t is the adjustment period, It is a measure of inflation for the adjustment period t and Rt is the constant-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
rt=(1 + Rt)"(1 + It) - 1; for t = 1,...,y " n;
where t is the adjustment period, It is a measure of inflation for the adjustment period t and Rt is the constant-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
6. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein when the specified constant-dollar financial instrument has a number of payments per period equal to the number of adjustments per period, the nominal-dollar payment schedule is defined as follows:
t=l ,. . . ,y.n where Pt is the equivalent nominal-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Pt is the constant-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Ii is the inflation rate in adjustment period i; n is number of periods to maturity of the instrument; and y equals the number of inflation adjustments per period.
t=l ,. . . ,y.n where Pt is the equivalent nominal-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Pt is the constant-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Ii is the inflation rate in adjustment period i; n is number of periods to maturity of the instrument; and y equals the number of inflation adjustments per period.
7. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein when the specified constant-dollar instrument is specified to be fully amortized over n periods with equal constant-dollar payments x times per period, and the number, y, of adjustments for inflation each period is less than x, the equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule is defined as follows:
t=1,. . .y.n i+1,. . .,x/y where Pt*x/y-i+1, , i = i,...,x/y, are the x/y equal nominal-dollar payments in adjustment period t; B0 is the original amount borrowed in constant-dollars: R is the fixed constant-dollar rate of return; Ij is the inflation rate for period j; and rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t,
t=1,. . .y.n i+1,. . .,x/y where Pt*x/y-i+1, , i = i,...,x/y, are the x/y equal nominal-dollar payments in adjustment period t; B0 is the original amount borrowed in constant-dollars: R is the fixed constant-dollar rate of return; Ij is the inflation rate for period j; and rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t,
8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the nominal-dollar amortization schedule is defined as follows:
bt = bt-1 (1 + rt) 1/x-Pt; for t = 1,...,x " n;
where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance in period t;
rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate in period t; and Pt is the nominal-dollar loan payment in period t; and bt-1 is the nominal dollar loan balance for the previous period.
bt = bt-1 (1 + rt) 1/x-Pt; for t = 1,...,x " n;
where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance in period t;
rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate in period t; and Pt is the nominal-dollar loan payment in period t; and bt-1 is the nominal dollar loan balance for the previous period.
9. The apparatus of claim 4 wherein when the specified constant-dollar financial instrument has a variable constant-dollar rate of return and a fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule, the con-verting means determines the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule before converting the constant-dollar payment schedule into an equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule is defined as follows:
t=1,. . .x.n where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance for period t: Bt is the scheduled constant-dollar loan balance for period t; and li is the inflation rate for period i; and x is the number of payments per period.
t=1,. . .x.n where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance for period t: Bt is the scheduled constant-dollar loan balance for period t; and li is the inflation rate for period i; and x is the number of payments per period.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the nominal-dollar payment schedule is defined as follows:
P = (l+rt)1/x .bt-1 -bt; t=l,. . .,x.n where Pt is the nominal-dollar payment in period t; rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return in period t: and bt is the equivalent nominal-dollar loan balance in period t.
P = (l+rt)1/x .bt-1 -bt; t=l,. . .,x.n where Pt is the nominal-dollar payment in period t; rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return in period t: and bt is the equivalent nominal-dollar loan balance in period t.
12. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the output data com-prises the primary components of the equivalent nominal-dollar finan-cial instrument.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein said primary compo-nents comprise rate of return, payment schedule, amortization sched-ule, terms and covenants.
14. The apparatus of claim 4 further comprising determining means for determining if the specified constant-dollar instrument has a fixed rate of return.
15. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein said primary compo-nents comprise a rate of return component, said apparatus further comprising means for transforming the rate of return component of the specified constant-dollar instrument into an effective annual rate of interest.
16. The apparatus of claim 2 further comprising means for searching the terms and covenants of the specified constant-dollar instrument for any numbers defined an constant-dollars and using said frequency of adjustment for inflation and said measure of inflation, converting said constant-dollar numbers into equivalent nominal-dollar numbers for every adjustment period.
17. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising loan servic-ing means for servicing received loan payments and other transactions.
18. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein said loan servicing means comprises input means for inputting payment data.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein said payment data comprises information relating to payments received, the date of receipt of said payments, and further wherein said input means pro-vides for inputting inflation data and other data.
20. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein said loan servicing means comprises means for calculating the current nominal-dollar interest rate for the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
21. The apparatus of claim 20 further comprising calculation means for calculating the current amount of interest and penalties due.
22. The apparatus of claim 21 wherein said calculating means further calculates the portion of received payment that is to be applied to the current interest and penalties.
23. The apparatus of claim 22 wherein said calculating means further calculates a change in accrued interest from a prior payment period and a new level of accrued interest.
24. The apparatus of claim 23 wherein said calculating means further calculates a change in outstanding loan balance from a prior payment period, and a new loan balance.
25. The apparatus of claim 24 wherein said calculating means further calculates a nominal-dollar rate of return for the subsequent payment period.
26. The apparatus of claim 17 wherein said loan servicing means comprises output means for outputting data comprising one or more of the following:
the current nominal-dollar return;
the current interest and penalties due;
the payment amount and the portion of the payment to be used for payment of current interest and penalties;
the change in the amount of accrued interest from the prior payment and the new level of accrued interest, the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period;
the current loan balance;
a list of any loan terms with which the loan is not cur-rently in compliance with, and the supporting data therefor, all current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower:
the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period; and the required payment of the subsequent payment period.
the current nominal-dollar return;
the current interest and penalties due;
the payment amount and the portion of the payment to be used for payment of current interest and penalties;
the change in the amount of accrued interest from the prior payment and the new level of accrued interest, the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period;
the current loan balance;
a list of any loan terms with which the loan is not cur-rently in compliance with, and the supporting data therefor, all current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower:
the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period; and the required payment of the subsequent payment period.
27. A method for converting a constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument comprising the steps of:
inputting input data to specify a constant-dollar financial instrument;
converting the specified constant-dollar financial instru-ment into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument: and outputting output data relating to the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
inputting input data to specify a constant-dollar financial instrument;
converting the specified constant-dollar financial instru-ment into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument: and outputting output data relating to the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
28. The method of claim 27 wherein the step of inputting said input data further comprises the steps of inputting primary component data of the specified constant-dollar instrument, inputting the measure of inflation to be used, inputting the base period and inputting the fre-quency of adjustment for inflation to be used in the converting step.
29. The method of claim 27 further comprising the step of generating a constant-dollar payment schedule and a constant-dollar amortization schedule for the specified constant-dollar financial instrument.
30. The method of claim 29 wherein the step of converting the specified constant-dollar financial instrument into an equivalent nominal-dollar instrument comprises the steps of calculating an equiv-alent nominal-dollar interest rate, converting the constant-dollar pay-ment schedule into an equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule and determining the equivalent nominal amortization schedule.
31. The method of claim 30 wherein said equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate rt is calculated by using the following formula:
rt = (1 + Rt) " (1 + It) - 1; for t = 1,...,y " n;
where t is the adjustment period, It is a measure of inflation for the adjustment period t and Rt is the constant-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
rt = (1 + Rt) " (1 + It) - 1; for t = 1,...,y " n;
where t is the adjustment period, It is a measure of inflation for the adjustment period t and Rt is the constant-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
32. The method of claim 30 wherein when the specified constant-dollar financial instrument has a number of payments per period equal to the number of adjustments per period, the nominal-dol-lar payment schedule is calculated according to the following formula:
where Pt is the equivalent nominal-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Pt is the constant-dollar payment in adjustment period t; It is the inflation rate in period i; n is number of periods to maturity of the instrument; and y equals the number of inflation adjustments per period.
where Pt is the equivalent nominal-dollar payment in adjustment period t; Pt is the constant-dollar payment in adjustment period t; It is the inflation rate in period i; n is number of periods to maturity of the instrument; and y equals the number of inflation adjustments per period.
33. The method of claim 30 wherein when the specified constant-dollar financial instrument is fully amortized over n periods with equal constant-dollar payments x times per period, and the num-ber, y, of adjustment for inflation each period less than x, the equiva-lent nominal-dollar payment schedule is calculated by using the follow-ing formula:
t=1,. . .y.n i=1,. . .,x/y where Pt*x/y-i+1, i-1,...,x/y, are the x/y equal nominal-dollar payments in adjustment period t;Bo is the original amount borrowed in constant-dollars: R is the fixed constant-dollar rate of return; Ij is the inflation rate for adjustment period j; and rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
t=1,. . .y.n i=1,. . .,x/y where Pt*x/y-i+1, i-1,...,x/y, are the x/y equal nominal-dollar payments in adjustment period t;Bo is the original amount borrowed in constant-dollars: R is the fixed constant-dollar rate of return; Ij is the inflation rate for adjustment period j; and rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return for adjustment period t.
34. The method of claim 33 wherein the nominal-dollar amor-tization schedule is calculated by using the following formula:
bt = bt-1(1 + rt)1/x -pt; for t= 1,...,x " n;
where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance in period t;
rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate in period t: and Pt is the nominal-dollar loan payment in period t: and bt-1 is the nominal dollar loan balance for the previous period.
bt = bt-1(1 + rt)1/x -pt; for t= 1,...,x " n;
where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance in period t;
rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar interest rate in period t: and Pt is the nominal-dollar loan payment in period t: and bt-1 is the nominal dollar loan balance for the previous period.
35. The method of claim 37 wherein when the specified constant-dollar financial instrument has a variable constant-dollar rate of return and a fixed constant-dollar amortization schedule, the step of calculating the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule is per-formed before the step of converting the constant-dollar payment schedule into an equivalent nominal-dollar payment schedule.
36. The method of claim 35 wherein the equivalent nominal-dollar amortization schedule is calculated by using the following for-mula:
; t = 1,. . .,x.n where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance for period t; Bt is the scheduled constant-dollar loan balance for period t; and Ii is the inflation rate for period i; and x is the number of payments per period.
; t = 1,. . .,x.n where bt is the scheduled nominal-dollar loan balance for period t; Bt is the scheduled constant-dollar loan balance for period t; and Ii is the inflation rate for period i; and x is the number of payments per period.
37. The method of claim 36 wherein the nominal-dollar pay-ment schedule is calculated using the following formula:
Pt = (1+rt)1/x .bt-1-bt; t=1,. . .,x.n where Pt is the nominal-dollar payment in period t; rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return in period t; and bt is the equivalent nominal-dollar loan balance in period t.
Pt = (1+rt)1/x .bt-1-bt; t=1,. . .,x.n where Pt is the nominal-dollar payment in period t; rt is the equivalent nominal-dollar rate of return in period t; and bt is the equivalent nominal-dollar loan balance in period t.
38. The method of claim 27 wherein the step of outputting output data comprises the steps of outputting the primary components of the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument.
39. The method of claim 38 wherein the step of outputting the primary components of the equivalent nominal-dollar financial instrument comprises the steps of outputing the rate of return, pay-ment schedule, amortization schedule, terms and covenants.
40. The method of claim 30 further comprising the steps of determining if the specified constant-dollar instrument has a fixed rate of return.
41. The method of claim 28 wherein said primary components comprise a rate of return component, further comprising the step of transforming the rate of return component of the specified constant-dollar instrument into an effective annual rate of interest.
42. The method of claim 28 further comprising the step of searching the terms and covenants of the specified constant-dollar instrument for any numbers defined in constant-dollars and using said frequency of adjustment for inflation and said measure inflation, con-verting said constant-dollar numbers into equivalent nominal-dollar numbers for every adjustment period.
43. The method of claim 27 further comprising the step of servicing received payments and other transactions concerning the specified financial instrument.
44. The method of claim 43 wherein the step of servicing comprises inputting payment data.
45. The method of claim 44 wherein the step of inputting payment data further comprise the steps of inputting information related to payments received, the date of receipt of said payments, inflation data and other data.
46. The method of claim 43 further comprising the steps of calculating the current nominal-dollar interest rate for the equivalent nominal-dollar instrument.
47. The method of claim 46 further comprising the steps of calculating the portion of a received payment that is to be applied to the current interest and penalties.
48. The method of claim 47 further comprising the steps of calculating a change in accrued interest from a prior payment period and a new level of accrued interest.
49. The method of claim 48 further comprising the step of calculating a change in the outstanding loan balance from a prior pay-ment period, and a new loan balance.
50. The method of claim 49 further comprising the steps of calculating a nominal-dollar rate of return for the subsequent payment.
51. The method of claim 43 further comprising the steps of outputting servicing data comprising one or more of the following:
the current nominal-dollar return;
the current interest and penalties due;
the payment amount and the portion of the payment to be used for payment of current interest and penalties;
the change in the amount of accrued interest from the prior payment and the new level of accrued interest;
the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period;
the current loan balance;
a list of any loan terms with which the loan is not cur-rently in compliance with, and the supporting data therefor;
all current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower;
the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period; and the required payment of the subsequent payment period.
the current nominal-dollar return;
the current interest and penalties due;
the payment amount and the portion of the payment to be used for payment of current interest and penalties;
the change in the amount of accrued interest from the prior payment and the new level of accrued interest;
the change in the outstanding loan balance from the prior payment period;
the current loan balance;
a list of any loan terms with which the loan is not cur-rently in compliance with, and the supporting data therefor;
all current financial data required to be supplied by the borrower;
the nominal-dollar return for the subsequent payment period; and the required payment of the subsequent payment period.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US07/485,543 US5237500A (en) | 1990-02-27 | 1990-02-27 | System and process for converting constant dollar financial instruments |
| US485,543 | 1990-02-27 |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA2076965A1 true CA2076965A1 (en) | 1991-08-28 |
Family
ID=23928567
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA002076965A Abandoned CA2076965A1 (en) | 1990-02-27 | 1991-02-26 | System and process for converting constant dollar financial instruments |
Country Status (6)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US5237500A (en) |
| EP (1) | EP0517806A1 (en) |
| AU (1) | AU661457B2 (en) |
| CA (1) | CA2076965A1 (en) |
| SG (1) | SG49129A1 (en) |
| WO (1) | WO1991013409A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (72)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US5802501A (en) * | 1992-10-28 | 1998-09-01 | Graff/Ross Holdings | System and methods for computing to support decomposing property into separately valued components |
| US5655085A (en) * | 1992-08-17 | 1997-08-05 | The Ryan Evalulife Systems, Inc. | Computer system for automated comparing of universal life insurance policies based on selectable criteria |
| US5303146A (en) | 1993-03-11 | 1994-04-12 | Borland International, Inc. | System and methods for improved scenario management in an electronic spreadsheet |
| US5495284A (en) | 1993-03-12 | 1996-02-27 | Katz; Ronald A. | Scheduling and processing system for telephone video communication |
| US20030185356A1 (en) | 1993-03-12 | 2003-10-02 | Telebuyer, Llc | Commercial product telephonic routing system with mobile wireless and video vending capability |
| US6323894B1 (en) | 1993-03-12 | 2001-11-27 | Telebuyer, Llc | Commercial product routing system with video vending capability |
| US6070151A (en) * | 1993-04-22 | 2000-05-30 | Fibonacci Corporation | System for the creation and collateralization of real estate mortgage investment conduit securities |
| US6460021B1 (en) | 1993-09-28 | 2002-10-01 | William E. Kirksey | Collaterally secured debt obligation and method of creating same |
| US5950175A (en) * | 1994-10-14 | 1999-09-07 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated | System for managing real estate SWAP accounts |
| US5704045A (en) * | 1995-01-09 | 1997-12-30 | King; Douglas L. | System and method of risk transfer and risk diversification including means to assure with assurance of timely payment and segregation of the interests of capital |
| US5742775A (en) * | 1995-01-18 | 1998-04-21 | King; Douglas L. | Method and apparatus of creating financial instrument and administering an adjustable rate loan system |
| US5689650A (en) * | 1995-02-23 | 1997-11-18 | Mcclelland; Glenn B. | Community reinvestment act network |
| US5717868A (en) * | 1995-03-07 | 1998-02-10 | Huntington Bancshares Inc. | Electronic payment interchange concentrator |
| US7937312B1 (en) | 1995-04-26 | 2011-05-03 | Ebay Inc. | Facilitating electronic commerce transactions through binding offers |
| US5845265A (en) * | 1995-04-26 | 1998-12-01 | Mercexchange, L.L.C. | Consignment nodes |
| US7702540B1 (en) | 1995-04-26 | 2010-04-20 | Ebay Inc. | Computer-implement method and system for conducting auctions on the internet |
| US5933815A (en) * | 1995-05-01 | 1999-08-03 | The Equitable Life Assurance Society Of The United States | Computerized method and system for providing guaranteed lifetime income with liquidity |
| US5794221A (en) | 1995-07-07 | 1998-08-11 | Egendorf; Andrew | Internet billing method |
| US7647243B2 (en) | 1995-11-07 | 2010-01-12 | Ebay Inc. | Electronic marketplace system and method for creation of a two-tiered pricing scheme |
| US6205434B1 (en) | 1995-12-18 | 2001-03-20 | The Evergreen Group Incorporated | Computerized indenture plan allocation determination management and reporting system |
| US5839118A (en) * | 1996-01-16 | 1998-11-17 | The Evergreen Group, Incorporated | System and method for premium optimization and loan monitoring |
| US10586282B2 (en) | 1996-03-25 | 2020-03-10 | Cfph, Llc | System and method for trading based on tournament-style events |
| US20050267836A1 (en) * | 1996-03-25 | 2005-12-01 | Cfph, Llc | Method and system for transacting with a trading application |
| US7487123B1 (en) * | 1996-03-25 | 2009-02-03 | Cfph, Llc | Computer-implemented securities trading system with virtual currency and virtual specialist |
| US6505174B1 (en) * | 1996-03-25 | 2003-01-07 | Hsx, Inc. | Computer-implemented securities trading system with a virtual specialist function |
| KR20000005489A (en) | 1996-04-12 | 2000-01-25 | 데이비드 슈라이버 | Inside money |
| US5884287A (en) * | 1996-04-12 | 1999-03-16 | Lfg, Inc. | System and method for generating and displaying risk and return in an investment portfolio |
| US5884283A (en) * | 1996-09-05 | 1999-03-16 | Manos; Christopher T. | System, method and program product for managing and controlling the disposition of financial resources |
| US5903879A (en) * | 1996-10-29 | 1999-05-11 | Mitchell; Clark Alan | Method of managing a loan for funding a pension |
| US5956691A (en) | 1997-01-07 | 1999-09-21 | Second Opinion Financial Systems, Inc. | Dynamic policy illustration system |
| US6110042A (en) * | 1997-07-14 | 2000-08-29 | Walker Digital, Llc | System and method for future value wagering |
| US7016870B1 (en) * | 1997-12-02 | 2006-03-21 | Financial Engines | Identifying a recommended portfolio of financial products for an investor based upon financial products that are available to the investor |
| US6021397A (en) * | 1997-12-02 | 2000-02-01 | Financial Engines, Inc. | Financial advisory system |
| US5918217A (en) * | 1997-12-10 | 1999-06-29 | Financial Engines, Inc. | User interface for a financial advisory system |
| US6721715B2 (en) | 1998-03-30 | 2004-04-13 | Martin A. Nemzow | Method and apparatus for localizing currency valuation independent of the original and objective currencies |
| US6292787B1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2001-09-18 | Financial Engines, Inc. | Enhancing utility and diversifying model risk in a portfolio optimization framework |
| WO2000026745A2 (en) * | 1998-11-02 | 2000-05-11 | Hsx, Inc. | Computer-implemented securities trading system with virtual currency and virtual specialist |
| US7747489B2 (en) * | 2003-10-06 | 2010-06-29 | New Market Solutions, Llc | Computer-aided process for real purchasing power financial product |
| WO2006014169A2 (en) * | 2004-07-06 | 2006-02-09 | Perg Wayne F | Private constant-dollar financial product system |
| US7702550B2 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2010-04-20 | New Market Solutions, Llc | Multiple computer system supporting a private constant-dollar financial product |
| US8392302B2 (en) * | 1999-03-31 | 2013-03-05 | Task Management, Inc. | Computer-aided process for inflation-immunized derivatives |
| US7680713B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2010-03-16 | New Market Solutions, Llc | Controlling a computer-aided process |
| US7080050B1 (en) * | 1999-08-05 | 2006-07-18 | Barter Securities | Electronic bartering system |
| US8793178B2 (en) * | 1999-08-05 | 2014-07-29 | Bartersecurities, Inc. | Electronic bartering system with facilitating tools |
| US20070027787A1 (en) * | 1999-10-06 | 2007-02-01 | Tripp Thomas W | Software system for real monetary instruments |
| US7818234B1 (en) | 1999-10-12 | 2010-10-19 | Egan Sean J | System and method for assigning ratings to mutual funds and other investment funds based on the value of various future and option securities |
| GB2357167A (en) * | 1999-12-10 | 2001-06-13 | Int Computers Ltd | Loan calculator/modeller with graphical display |
| US6647375B1 (en) | 1999-12-14 | 2003-11-11 | Dynamic Risk Assumption, Inc. | Risk reduction system |
| CA2401073A1 (en) * | 2000-02-23 | 2001-08-30 | Financial Engines, Inc. | Load aware optimization |
| US7860773B1 (en) * | 2000-04-03 | 2010-12-28 | Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company | System and method for providing secure retirement benefits via a conversion process |
| US20040225580A1 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2004-11-11 | Bernard Gelman | Lease termination method |
| WO2002069112A2 (en) * | 2001-02-26 | 2002-09-06 | Richard Himmelstein | Electronic bartering system with facilitating tools |
| US7305353B1 (en) * | 2001-03-01 | 2007-12-04 | Charles Schwab Co., Inc. | System and method for forecasting tax effects of financial transactions |
| US8768800B2 (en) * | 2001-04-26 | 2014-07-01 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | System and method for income planner |
| US7386493B2 (en) * | 2001-08-26 | 2008-06-10 | Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & Mccloy Llp | System and method for managing concentration of corporate debt |
| US8200561B1 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2012-06-12 | Financial Engines, Inc. | Tax-aware asset allocation |
| US7383218B1 (en) | 2002-07-31 | 2008-06-03 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | Method and system for integrating investment advice with financial account statement information |
| US8353763B2 (en) | 2003-03-31 | 2013-01-15 | Cantor Index, Llc | System and method for betting on a participant in a group of events |
| WO2004090678A2 (en) | 2003-04-11 | 2004-10-21 | Cantor Index Llc | Lottery and auction based tournament entry exchange platform |
| US20050055295A1 (en) * | 2003-09-05 | 2005-03-10 | Bateson Douglas F. | Method and system for providing stable value |
| US7203664B2 (en) * | 2003-09-26 | 2007-04-10 | Alliance America Corporation | System and method for annuity valuation |
| US7860774B1 (en) | 2003-10-31 | 2010-12-28 | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. | System and method for providing financial advice for an investment portfolio |
| US7698198B2 (en) | 2004-01-16 | 2010-04-13 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | System and method for purchasing a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue |
| US7567931B2 (en) | 2004-01-16 | 2009-07-28 | Bgc Partners, Inc. | System and method for forming a financial instrument indexed to entertainment revenue |
| US7574392B2 (en) * | 2004-09-08 | 2009-08-11 | Schaub Benson L | System, method and apparatus for investment using a deed of trust or mortgage instrument |
| US7774253B1 (en) * | 2006-10-27 | 2010-08-10 | Bank Of America Corporation | Margin reserve in lending |
| US7865416B1 (en) | 2006-12-05 | 2011-01-04 | Ross/Graff Holdings Llc | Securitized real-property-related asset system |
| US8510190B1 (en) | 2006-12-05 | 2013-08-13 | Ross/Graff Holdings Llc | Securitized-real-property-related asset system |
| WO2008131010A1 (en) | 2007-04-16 | 2008-10-30 | Cfph, Llc | Box office game |
| US20100145877A1 (en) * | 2008-10-13 | 2010-06-10 | Timothy Haug | Method and System of Enabling Investment in Real Estate Assets in Exchange for Periodic Payments |
| US20100223175A1 (en) * | 2008-10-29 | 2010-09-02 | Kcg Ip Holdings Llc | Method and system for standardizing bilaterally-negotiated derivative positions |
| US20110153494A1 (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-23 | Gm Global Technology Operations, Inc. | Systems and Methods Associated with Distributing Financing and Risk Among Members of a Value Chain |
Family Cites Families (8)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US3863060A (en) * | 1972-10-30 | 1975-01-28 | Hewlett Packard Co | General purpose calculator with capability for performing interdisciplinary business calculations |
| US4507745A (en) * | 1981-12-21 | 1985-03-26 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Data processing apparatus having alterable interest rate mode capability |
| US4722055A (en) * | 1984-03-08 | 1988-01-26 | College Savings Bank | Methods and apparatus for funding future liability of uncertain cost |
| US4752877A (en) * | 1984-03-08 | 1988-06-21 | College Savings Bank | Method and apparatus for funding a future liability of uncertain cost |
| US4642768A (en) * | 1984-03-08 | 1987-02-10 | Roberts Peter A | Methods and apparatus for funding future liability of uncertain cost |
| US4739478A (en) * | 1984-11-21 | 1988-04-19 | Lazard Freres & Co. | Methods and apparatus for restructuring debt obligations |
| US4648038A (en) * | 1984-11-21 | 1987-03-03 | Lazard Freres & Co. | Methods and apparatus for restructuring debt obligations |
| US4742457A (en) * | 1985-08-27 | 1988-05-03 | Trans Texas Holdings Corporation | System and method of investment management including means to adjust deposit and loan accounts for inflation |
-
1990
- 1990-02-27 US US07/485,543 patent/US5237500A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1991
- 1991-02-26 AU AU74976/91A patent/AU661457B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1991-02-26 CA CA002076965A patent/CA2076965A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 1991-02-26 EP EP91905705A patent/EP0517806A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 1991-02-26 WO PCT/US1991/001101 patent/WO1991013409A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1991-02-26 SG SG1996006325A patent/SG49129A1/en unknown
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| WO1991013409A2 (en) | 1991-09-05 |
| WO1991013409A3 (en) | 1991-10-17 |
| AU7497691A (en) | 1991-09-18 |
| US5237500A (en) | 1993-08-17 |
| AU661457B2 (en) | 1995-07-27 |
| EP0517806A1 (en) | 1992-12-16 |
| SG49129A1 (en) | 1998-05-18 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA2076965A1 (en) | System and process for converting constant dollar financial instruments | |
| US7680713B2 (en) | Controlling a computer-aided process | |
| Smith Jr et al. | The market for interest rate swaps | |
| US5819238A (en) | Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights | |
| Ingersoll, Jr | Digital contracts: Simple tools for pricing complex derivatives | |
| US20100306132A1 (en) | Managing an investment vehicle | |
| US20100241539A1 (en) | Method and system of managing a borrower's loan obligations | |
| Gulko | The entropy theory of bond option pricing | |
| WO1997022075A1 (en) | Apparatus and accompanying methods for automatically modifying a financial portfolio through dynamic re-weighting based on a non-constant function of current capitalization weights | |
| US20020138388A1 (en) | Method and system for reconciling equity hedge funds | |
| US20050187850A1 (en) | Method for efficient investment and distribution of assets | |
| US6144947A (en) | System for automatically determining net capital deductions for securities held, and process for implementing same | |
| Zechner et al. | The critical implicit tax rate and capital structure | |
| Crum et al. | A network model of insurance company cash flow management | |
| Leal | Using accounting information in prospectuses to invest in Brazilian IPOs during high inflation years | |
| Agrawal et al. | Price to book ratio as a valuation model: An empirical investigation | |
| US11538115B2 (en) | Systems and methods for administering index-linked financial products | |
| Rouvolis | International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Exploring Financial Evidence from Listed Companies in the US | |
| US8392302B2 (en) | Computer-aided process for inflation-immunized derivatives | |
| Peasnell | The present value concept in financial reporting. | |
| Baldeaux et al. | Liability driven investments under a benchmark based approach | |
| Gundersen et al. | NORA: a microfounded model for fiscal policy analysis in Norway | |
| Mintz | Taxation of investment and finance in an international setting: Implications for tax competition | |
| Josephy et al. | On the numerical aspects of optimal option hedging with transaction costs | |
| Zaheer et al. | Effects of Monetary Policy on Stability and Asset Quality of the Conventional and Islamic Banks |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| EEER | Examination request | ||
| FZDE | Discontinued |