CA1334035C - Fiducial implant and method of using the same - Google Patents
Fiducial implant and method of using the sameInfo
- Publication number
- CA1334035C CA1334035C CA000616562A CA616562A CA1334035C CA 1334035 C CA1334035 C CA 1334035C CA 000616562 A CA000616562 A CA 000616562A CA 616562 A CA616562 A CA 616562A CA 1334035 C CA1334035 C CA 1334035C
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- bone
- skin
- fiducial
- implant
- coordinate system
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/12—Devices for detecting or locating foreign bodies
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/10—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges for stereotaxic surgery, e.g. frame-based stereotaxis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/36—Image-producing devices or illumination devices not otherwise provided for
- A61B2090/363—Use of fiducial points
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/39—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers
- A61B2090/3954—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers magnetic, e.g. NMR or MRI
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B90/00—Instruments, implements or accessories specially adapted for surgery or diagnosis and not covered by any of the groups A61B1/00 - A61B50/00, e.g. for luxation treatment or for protecting wound edges
- A61B90/39—Markers, e.g. radio-opaque or breast lesions markers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/1048—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
- A61N5/1049—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for verifying the position of the patient with respect to the radiation beam
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S378/00—X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices
- Y10S378/901—Computer tomography program or processor
Abstract
The present invention pertains to a fiducial implant for the human body that is detectable by an imaging system. The invention is comprised of a first portion and a second portion.
The first portion is configured to be detected by an imaging system when placed beneath the skin. The second portion is configured for fixed attachment to a bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing the bone. The first portion is sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system, and sufficiently small to avoid the distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone. The first portion also has at least a portion which is spherical and defines a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing the second portion to the bone. Additionally, the placement of three fiducial implants into a portion of anatomy of the human body allows for the recreation of a particular image slice of the portion of the anatomy taken by an imaging system with respect to a first time period, at subsequent imaging sessions and also with different scan modalities. This provides a doctor with the ability to accurately follow the progress of the portion of the anatomy of interest.
Moreover, the existence of three fiducial implants allows a target to be identified within the portion of anatomy relative to an external coordinate system. The portion of anatomy with the target may then be operated on, for instance, robotically, or precisely irradiated.
The first portion is configured to be detected by an imaging system when placed beneath the skin. The second portion is configured for fixed attachment to a bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing the bone. The first portion is sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system, and sufficiently small to avoid the distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone. The first portion also has at least a portion which is spherical and defines a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing the second portion to the bone. Additionally, the placement of three fiducial implants into a portion of anatomy of the human body allows for the recreation of a particular image slice of the portion of the anatomy taken by an imaging system with respect to a first time period, at subsequent imaging sessions and also with different scan modalities. This provides a doctor with the ability to accurately follow the progress of the portion of the anatomy of interest.
Moreover, the existence of three fiducial implants allows a target to be identified within the portion of anatomy relative to an external coordinate system. The portion of anatomy with the target may then be operated on, for instance, robotically, or precisely irradiated.
Description
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR IMAGING THE ANATOMY
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION OF THE INVENTION
This application, being a divisional of Canadian Patent Application Serial Number 581,885 filed November 1, 1988 discloses subject matter claimed in both serial number 581,885 as well as in this application.
Diagnostic techniques that allow the practicing clinician to obtain high fidelity views of the anatomical structure of a human body have proved helpful to both the patient and the doctor. Imaging systems providing cross-sectional views such as computed tomographic (CT) x-ray imagers or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) machines have provided the ability to improve visualization of the anatomical structure of the human body without surgery or other invasive techniques. The patient can be subjected to scanning techniques of such imaging systems, and the patient's anatomical structure can be reproduced in a form for evaluation by a trained doctor.
The doctor sufficiently experienced in these techniques can evaluate the images of the patient's anatomy and determine if there are any abnormalities present. An abnormality in the form of a tumor appears on the image as a shape that has a discernable contrast with the surrounding area. The difference in contrast is due to the tumor having different imaging properties than the surrounding body tissue. Moreover, the contrasting shape that represents the tumor appears at a location on the image where such a shape would not normally appear with regard to a similar image of a healthy person. ~
~ 334035 Once a tumor has been identified, several methods of ~reatment are utilized to remove or destroy the tumor including chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery. When chemotherapy is chosen drugs are introduced into the patient's body to destroy the tumor. During the course of treatment, imagers are commonly used to follow the progress of treatment by subjecting the patient to periodic scans and comparing the images taken over the course of the treatment to ascertain any changes in the tumor configurations.
In radiation therapy, the images of the tumor generated by the imager are used by a radiologist to adjust the irradiating device and to direct radiation solely at the tumor while minimizing or eliminating adverse effects to surrounding healthy tissue. During the course of the radiation treatment, the imaging system is also used to follow the progress of the patient in the same manner described above with respect to chemotherapy.
When surgery is used to remove a tumor, the images of the tumor in the patient can guide the surgeon during the operation. By reviewing the images prior to surgery, the surgeon can decide the best strategy for reaching and excising the tumor.
After surgery has been performed, further scanning is utilized to evaluate the success of the surgery and the subsequent progress of the patient.
A problem associated with the scanning techniques mentioned above is the inability to select and compare accurately the cross section of the same anatomical area in images that have been obtained by imagers at different times or by images obtained essentially at the same time using different image modalities, e.g., CT and MRI. The inaccuracy in image comparison can be better appreciated from an explanation of the scanning techniques and how the imaging systems generate the images within a cross-sectional "slice" of the patient's anatomy. A slice depicts elemental volumes within the cross-section of the patient's anatomy that is exposed or excited by a radiation beam or a magnetic field and the information is recorded on a film or other tangible medium. Since the images are created from slices defined by the relative position of the patient with respect to the imager, a change of the orientation of the patient results in different elemental volumes being introduced into the slice.
Thus, for comparison purposes two sets of approximately the same anatomical mass taken at different times, do not provide comparable information that can be accurately used to determine the changes that occurred between two images in the sets, since it is unknown to what extent the two images selected from the respective sets share common views.
The adverse effects on the medical practice of such errors is exemplified by diagnostic technlques utilized by the surgeon or others in diagnosing a tumor within a patient. If a patient has a tumor, its size density and location can be 1 ~4035 ~etermined with the help of images generated by a scanning device.
~or the clinician to make an assessment of the patient's treatment, two scanning examinations are required. The patient is subjected to an initial scan that generates a number of slices through the portion of the anatomy, for instance the brain, to be diagnosed. During scanning, the patient is held in a substantially fixed position with respect to the imager. Each slice of a particular scan is taken at a predetermined distance from the previous slice and parallel thereto. Using the images of the slices, the doctor can evaluate the tumor. If, however, the doctor wants to assess changes in the configuration of the tumor over a given period of time, a second or "follow-up" scan has to be taken.
The scanning procedure is repeated, but since the patient may be in a position different from that in the original scan, comparison of the scans is hampered. Slices obtained at the follow-up examination may be inadvertently taken at an angle when compared to the original slices. Accordingly the image created may depict a larger volume than that which was actually depicted before. Conseguently, the surgeon may get a false impression of the size of the tumor when comparing scans taken at different periods. Because of this, slice-by-slice comparison cannot be performed satisfactorily.
Similarly for certain surgical techniques it is desirable to have accurate and reliable periodic scans of I ~S4U3S
identical segments of the tumor within the cranial cavity. If the scans before and after surgery are inaccurate, the doctor may not get the correct picture of the result of surgery. These same inaccuracies apply to other treatments such as chemotherapy discussed above.
Additionally, with regard to imaging systems and the integral part they play in surgical and other tumor treatment procedures, there is a dearth of methods currently existing that allow a determination of a desired location within the body at a given time. For example, U.S. Patent 4,583,538 to Onik, et. al.
discloses a localization device that is placed on a patient's skin which can be identified in a slice of a CT scan. A reference point is chosen from a position on the device which exactly correlates to a point on the CT scan. Measurements of the localization device on the CT scan is then correlated to the device on the patient.
Exterior devices have been utilized in an attempt to solve some of these problems with accuracy such as that shown in U.S. Patent 4,341,220 to Perry which discloses a frame that fits over the skull of a patient. The frame has three plates, each defining a plurality of slots on three of four sides. The slots are of varying lengths and are se~uentially ordered with respect to length. Frame coordinates defined and found on the frame correspond to the varying heights of the slots. When slices of the skull and brain are taken by an imaging device, the plane ~ 334035 formed by the slice intersects the three plates. The number of full slots in the slice are counted with respect to each plate to determine the coordinate of a target site with the brain.
Accordingly, only one CT scan is needed to pinpoint the coordinates of the target.
Other attempts have included the use of catheters for insertion into the anatomy. For example, U.S. Patent 4,572,198 to Codington discloses a catheter with a coil winding in its tip to excite or weaken the magnetic field. The weak magnetic field is detectable by an NMR device thus pinpointing the location of the catheter tip with respect to the NMR device.
Applicant's invention largely overcomes many of the deficiencies noted above with regard to imagers used heretofore.
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for insuring that scans taken at different times produce images substantially identical to those of previous scans even if they are from different image modalities at different times. This insures that a more accurate assessment of any changes in anatomy is obtained.
As a result, the doctor can be more certain as to the size, location and density of the tumor, or a section thereof, that is located in the cranial cavity.
This ability will enhance the use of surgical techniques in removing or otherwise eliminating the tumor in particular by those noninvasive techniques such as laser technology. By having ~ 334035 the ability to define accurately the tumor location and size, laser beams can be focused directly on the tumor. Intermittently, as part of surgical techniques, scans can be made to determine if the tumor has moved or substantially changed in size as a result of the surgery. The laser or other surgical instrument can be adjusted accordingly. Because of the accuracy of the imaging techniques produced by the invention, the doctor can be confident that the amount of healthy tissue destroyed during surgery is minimized.
A method adopted by the invention disclosed herein utilizes fiducial implants or implants to define a plane which cooperates with the imager, or other computer, and particularly the data processing capabilities of the imager to insure that subsequent scanning results in slices substantially parallel to those taken during the initial scan. The fiducial implants are implanted beneath the skin into the calvania and are spaced sufficiently from one another to define a plane. The patient with these implants implanted is placed in the scanning device in the conventional manner and scanned to provide the images of consecutive parallel slices of a given thickness along a predetermined path through the cranial cavity.
As the scans are taken, one or more slices will be needed to accommodate part or all of each fiducial implant. The computational features of the imager or other computer will take into account the spatial relationship between any selected plane ~ 334035 of a slice and that plane defined by the fiducial implants.
Because of this capability, images taken in subsequent scans at different points in time, at different angles can be reconstructed to be substantially identical with the slices taken originally.
Fiducial implants for this purpose are specially configured and made of material that enables their implantation into the skull and the ability to be detected by scanning devices.
The fiducial implant as disclosed herein is configured to insure that during implantation it does not have adverse effects on the skull such as cracking or extending through to the cranial cavity.
Nor is it sufficiently exposed between the skull and the skin to distort any external features of the anatomy. Furthermore, the fiducial implant is positioned at least on a portion of the skull at the interface of the skin and the bone of the skull to facilitate its imaging by the imager. At least a portion of the implant is symmetrical in cross-section such that slices taken of the cranial cavity for example can be used to locate the center of mass of the implant. This insures accuracy in using the implant image as a reference point to transform the subsequent slices of the follow-up examination into the proper position and orientation.
The above has been a description of certain deficiencies in the prior art and advantages of the invention. Other advantages may be perceived from the detailed description of the preferred embodiment which follows.
~ 334035 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A more complete appreciation of the present invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained, as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a side and overhead view of fiducial implants.
Figure 2 is a side and overhead view of a preferred positioning scheme of fiducial implants in the skull.
Figure 3 is an offset view of two coordinate systems that have undergone translation with respect to each other.
Figure 4 is an offset view of two coordinate systems that have undergone rotation with respect to each other.
Figure 5 and Figures Sa, 5b and 5c are offset views of two coordinate systems that have undergone translation and rotation with respect to each other.
Figure 6 is a flow chart with respect to determining the -same point P~at two different times in an internal coordinate system to the body.
Figure 7 is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 8 is a flow chart with respect to determining the location of a point P in an internal coordinate system with respect to an external coordinate system.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In FIG. 1, there is shown a fiducial implant lO for the human body that is detectable by an imaging system. The fiducial implant comprises a first portion 12 and a second portion 14. The first portion 12 is configured to be detected by an imaging system (when place beneath the skin.) The second portion 14 is configured for fixed attachment to the bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing the bone. The first portion 12 is sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system and sufficiently small to provide minimal distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone. First portion 12 also has at least a portion which is spherical and defines a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing the second portion 14 to the bone. Additionally, the placement of 1 334~35 -'three fiducial implants 10 into a portion of anatomy of the human body allows for the recreation of a particular image slice of the portion of the anatomy taken by an imaging system in order to duplicate images taken at the first time period, that is, at the initial examination. This provides a doctor with the ability to accurately follow the progress of treatment on selected slices representing the anatomy of interest.
Moreover, the existence of three fiducial implants 10 allows a target (a tumor for instance) to be identified relative to an external coordinate system. The portion of anatomy with the target may then be operated on, for instance, robotically, or precisely irradiated.
To allow for the accurate comparison of image slices from at least two distinct periods of time, the three fiducial implants 10 are first implanted into a body of a patient at a desired region of interest. The patient is then placed in an imaging system and images of a series of cross-sectional slices are obtained that include, for example, the volume of the tumor which is the primary target of interest. From the imaging data obtained, the three fiducial implants are located and an internal coordinate system is defined with respect to them. If it is so desired, the image data may be further reformatted to show image slices whose direction is different from that obtained originally during the imaging period. Depending on the diagnostic information that these image slices reveal, appropriate decisions ~ 334035 with regard to surgery, chemotherapy or radiation therapy on a patient may be made. The imaging data can also be used from several different types of images, such as CT, PET or NMR to obtain the same view of the anatomy but with different qualities stressed.
If it is decided to obtain further imaging data at a later time, then the patient is returned to the imaging system and the procedure for obtaining image data is repeated. The fiducial implants 10 are located with respect to the second imaging session and the same internal coordinate system is defined relative to the implants 10. Once the same internal coordinate system is defined with respect to the second imaging session, the translation and rotation of the internal coordinate system and the images with it is determined with respect to the coordinate system established at the first imaging session. An image slice identified from the first imaging session that is to be used for diagnosis, is recovered from the second imaging session. The two image slices, one from the first image session and one from the second image session, are then compared to determine what changes, if any, have occurred in the anatomy of the patient.
More specifically, a 3-dimensional noncollinear coordlnate system requires three distinct noncollinear points to be fully defined. If there are more than three identifiable points, the system is over-determined and three points have to be chosen to define the coordinate system. If there are less than three identifiable distinct points, the system is undetermined and a position relative to the one or two identifiable points will not be defined.
The known location of three distinct points identlfies a plane upon which an orthogonal coordinate system can be established. If the three points are fixed in place relativé to each other over time in the body, a coordinate system can be established that is also fixed in time. The ability to define a fixed internal coordinate system to the human body over time has important ramifications. A fully defined internal coordinate system that is fixed in place over time with respect to some location in the body permits comparison of subsequent images of the body taken into imaging systems such as CT scans, NMR scans or PET scans, to name a few. More precisely, these comparisons will allow a diagnostician to see what change, if any, has occurred within the body at a predetermined location.
By utilizing a fixed coordinate system relative to the body, the same coordinates can be compared over time. However, the tissue or body material is not necessarily fixed in place relative to a predetermined set of coordinates over time. After the passage of time, the tissue may have shifted, a change not uncommon following surgery. Nevertheless, the ability to compare various properties (depending on the type of images) of the tissue at the same coordinates and at different times is a great advantage for diagnostic purposes.
~ 334035 In principle, the three points-(that are necessary) to define a coordinate system can be chosen in a variety of ways. In one embodiment with respect to the brain or head region, the two ears and a tooth, or the two ears and the nose may comprise the three points. Alternatively, an image slice of the skull could provide a set of points from which the three points would be chosen to create the coordinate system for the body. Preferably, three fiducial points that are implanted into the body, and create high contrast images during scanning, provide the most reliable way to define a coordinate system. Ideally the three points should be in the same approximate area of the body that is under analysis, and also should be identifiable and measureable by different imagery systems, such as CT imagers and NMR imagers.
To create a fully defined coordinate system the detection of three distinct noncollinear fiducial points is required. With respect to creating a fully-defined coordinate system anchored to the human body, the requirement of detection dictates the need that fiducial implants 10 are made of a material that is detectable by a system imaging the human body. The fiducial implant 10 has a first portion 12 that provides means for marking a predetermined position within a body. See Figure 1.
First portion, or marker 12, ideally provides a high contrast in an image compared to the surrounding material. The material marker 12 is made of also provides as little distortion as possible to the image so the appearance of artifacts is kept to a minimum. Marker 12 is also safe for use in the human body and is unobtrusive so no discomfort or sel,f-consciousness is experienced by a wearer.
Marker 12 exhibits symmetrical integrity to facilitate its location by the imaging system. When marker 12 is scanned, the symmetry insures that any plane through the implant provides essentially the same image and the ability to locate its center of mass. The importance of being able to identify the center of the marker 12 lies in the fact that the same exact point can be reproductibly found for use in defining the coordinate system.
Error is thus minimized from subsequent recreations of the same coordinate system due to displacement of the coordinate system from a previous alignment. Eor instance, a sphere is the ideal shape for a marker 12 with respect to symmetrical integrity since the image of any plane of the sphere is always a circle.
By knowing the radius of the spherical object and applying standard algorithms, the center can be determined of the spherical marker 12 from any plane passing through the sphere.
The algorithm for determining the center of a sphere may require operator interaction to mark the approximate location of the implant. The center of mass can be determined with successful approximation from the boundary of the circular profile identified through the operator's interaction. For instance, by having a Priori information about the density distribution of the fiducial implant's image and assuming it has spherical symmetry, then scan profiles through its image result in bell-shaped distributions, the boundaries-of which can be determined therefrom. F~om the boundary points of the center of mass is computed. This may require additional slices depending on the size of the fiducial implant and its relative position with respect to adjacent slices, particularly when the physical size of the implant exceeds that of the scan slice.
When the centers of mass of the 3 fiducials (lOa, lOb, lOc) are determined, then two of them (lOa, lOb) define for instance the x-axis vector of the coordinate system and the vector product of vectors lOa, lOb and lOa, lOc fully determine the coordinate system as shown in Figure 5a which is described more fully below.
Marker 12, which is 1 to 10 and preferably 4 millimeters in diameter, can be made of, for example, titanium in the form of a hollow sphere. The hollow of the sphere can be, for example, filled with agarose gel having various desired dopants, the choice of which depends on the imaging system used to best accent or highlight the marker 12. Marker 12 is intimately connected to a second portion 14 of the fiducial implant 10.
The second portion 14 provides means for anchoring 14 the implant means 12 into the body The site of preference for anchoring the marker 12 in the body is bone, since it provides a good material to hold the implant means in place and also because 1 ~34035 bone stays in a fixed position over time in the body. Anchor 14 is long enough to penetrate into the bone to which it is anchored, and long enough to be firmly embedded without fracturing the bone Anchor 14 is 1 to 10 and preferably 3 millimeters long.
Preferably the anchor 14 should be screwed into the bone, rather than driven with an impact tool to lessen the chance of fracturing the bone. Anchor 14 can also, for example, be made of titanium.
The fiducial implant 10 also has means 16 for receiving force so the anchoring means 14 can be fixedly secured to the body. Where anchoring means 14 is a screw, preferably an indention 16 in the shape of a polygon recess to receive an allen wrench is located in implant means 12. The use of an allen wrench with the associated polygonal recess has more symmetrical integrity than the cross shaped receptor site for a phillips screw driver or a single groove receptor site for a standard screw driver.
The implantation of a fiducial implant 10 having an anchor, in this case a screw 14, preferably utilizes a trocar not shown, to penetrate the skin and reach a desired bone site. The trocar is first placed on the skin over the desired anchoring site and a piercing rod therein is forced through the skin. The piercing rod within the trocar is then removed while the trocar is kept in place. A rod with an allen wrench head fitted to the polygonal indentation 16 in the implant means 12 of the implant 10 is inserted into the trocar until the screw 14 portion of the implant 10 contacts the anchoring site, for instance bone. Force is then applied to the por`tion of the rod extending out the trocar until the implant 10 is embedded into the bone. Such a procedure is accomplished under local anesthesia and should only be about 5 minutes in length.
The placement of the three fiducial implants 10 depends on the portion of the anatomy to be evaluated. Essentially, three fiducial implants 10 are placed in three locations such that they are readily identifiable and the locations are fixed with respect to each other over time. If, for example, a study of the skull and brain is to be undertaken, preferably an implant lOA is placed on the midline of the skull 18 just above the hairline, with the other two implants lOB, lOC being placed on the right and left side, respectively, of the midline in a posterior position to the midline implant lOA. See Figures 2a and 2b which are a frontal and overhead view of the skull 18, respectively. Another example of an area of interest could be the torso, with one fiducial implant 10 placed on the midline of the sternum and the other two fiducial implants 10 placed laterally thereto on the right and left side, respectively, and in a rib. Or, one fiducial implant 10 can be placed in the spinous process of a vertebra in the midline and the other two fiducial implants placed in the right and left illiac crest, respectively.
Imaging apparatus provides a fixed axis relative to which any other position in space can be located. As a result, - ~ 334~
the position of the fiducial marker and the coordinate system these markers define can be located relative to the imaging apparatus. The features of the invention permit the location of the markers relative to the imaging apparatus to be recorded for future reference. In subsequent scans, the patient's orientation may change relative to the imaging apparatus. This new orientation can be measured by locating the fiducial markers in relation to the image apparatus and comparing it to the previously recorded location. The comparison technique permits re-orienting images of subsequent scans to a position corresponding to the earlier recorded scan so that image slices are always at generally the same cross-section of the earlier recorded slices.
In actual operation, these positions are defined by coordinate system and it is the position of these systems that is accomplished translation on rotation as discussed below.
Once the fiducial implants 10 are in place and a coordinate system defined, subsequent images of the same anatomical volume area can be compared. If, for example, images of the brain are being taken, a person's head may be placed below, above or to the side (see Figure 3), of its location at a previous imaging session. The head might be rotated (see Figure 4), as compared to its orientation during an earlier imaging session.
The head might have undergone rotation and translation as compared to a previous imaging session, see Figure 5. Regardless of the reason why the head is oriented differently, by taking advantage ~ 334035 of the fixed fully-defined internal coordinate system in the brain a previous point or slice image of the brain can be obtained from subsequent image information. This is accomplished as shown in Figure 6, by comparing the location and direction of the plane defined by the three fiducial points at the first examination with the location and direction of the same plane defined by the three fiducial points at the time of the second examination. For simplicity, the origin of the coordinate system is located at a given fiducial point. By measuring the distance in say, the x, y and z directions between the same fiducial point (the origins) at the two different times, the translation of the origin of one coordinate system with respect to the other can be obtained.
Preferably, one can carry out the transformation with respect to rotation from a given cartesian coordinate system to another by means of three successful rotations performed in a specific sequence. Three angles known as the Eulerian angles are then defined. These three Eulerian angles are the three successful angles of rotation that are required to carry out the transformation. The determination of the Eulerian angles is accomplished by first computing the intersection of two planes determined by the fiducial implants, then computing the angle between the fiducial x-axis and the line of intersection (psi), then computing the angle theta; and then computing the angle phi At this point the three Eulerian angles are determined. For the example given in Figures 5a, 5b and 5c the sequence that is required to carry out the transformation is started by rotating the initial systems of axes, xyz, by an angle phi counterclockwise about the z axis as shown in Figure 5a. The resul-tant coordinate system is labelled the xi,eta,zeta axes . In the second stage, the intermediate axes, xi,eta,zeta, are rotated about the xi axis counterclockwise by an angle theta to produce another intermediate set, the xi',eta',zeta' axes as shown in Figure 5b where the third fiducial implant lOc is not shown to simplify understanding. The xi' axis is at the intersection of the xy and xi'eta' planes and is known as the line of nodes. Finally the xi',eta',zeta' axes are rotated counterclockwise by an angle psi about the zeta' axis to produce the desired x'y'z' system of axes as shown in Figure 5c. The Eulerian angles theta, phi and psi thus completely specify the orientation of the x'y'z' coordinate system relative to the xyz coordinate system and can therefore act as the three needed generalized coordinates.
The elements of the complete transformation A can be obtained by writing a complete transformation matrix as the triple product of the separate rotations, each of which can be written in matrix form. Thus the initial rotation about the z axis can be described by the matrix D:
xi = Dx where xi and x stand for column matrices. Similarly, the transformation from xi,eta, zeta, to xi',eta',zeta' can be described by the matrix C:
~ 334035 X' = Cxi nd the last rotation to x'y'z' by a matrix B
x' = Bxi' hus the matrix of the complete transformation can be written as x' = Ax hich is the product of the successive matrices:
A = BCD
The matrix D can be written as cos phi sin phi `R
D= -sin phi cos phi `R
`R `R
The matrix C can be written as 1 `R `R
C= `R cos theta sin theta `R -sin theta cos theta The matrix B can be written as cos psi sin psi `R
B= -sin psi cos psi R
`R `R
he product matrix A = BCD is then obtained with the help of the bove expression. The order of the matrix multiplication depends ~ 334035 upon the task identified; in the present case it defines the transformation from the xyz set of axes to the x'y'z' set of axes.
Once the Euler angles are determined, the problem of orientation is solved, at least, in principle. A major simplification of the computation can, however, be achieved if Euler's theorem is implemented.
Euler's theorem on the motion of a rigid body states:
that the general displacement of a rigid body with one point fixed is a rotation about some axis.
If the fixed point is taken as the origin of the body set of axes, then the displacement of the rigid body involves no translation of the body set of axes, the only change is the orientation. The theorem then states that the body set of axes can always be obtained as a single rotation of the initial coordinate system. It is characteristic of rotation that it leaves the direction of rotation unaffected by the operation. In other words, any vector lying in the direction of the axis of rotation must have the same components before and after the rotation. A necessary condition is that the magnitude of the vector should be unaffected and is automatically provided by the orthogonality conditions. Thus Euler's theorem can be proven if it is shown that there exits a vector R having the same component before and after the transformation, that is, in both systems.
From this it follows, that R' = AR = R
The above is an eigenvalue problem that can be written as AR - kR
where k is constant. The values for which k is soluble are called eigenvalues of the matrix.
The eigenvalue equations may be written (A - kl)R = `R
This equation comprises a set of three homogeneous simultaneous equations for the components X,Y,Z of the vector R. Because of this they can never provide the definite values of the three components, only their ratios. Thus the magnitudes of the components remain undetermined. For homogeneous equations the determinant of the above equation has to vanish, and the solution provides the values of k. For the real, orthogonal, matrices the equation must have k=+1.
In general the equation has three roots corresponding to three eigenvectors. The consideration lead to diagonal matrix of k kl `R `R
k= `R k2 `R
R `R k3 The matrix equation can then be written AR = Rk or multiplying from the left by R**(-1) R **(-l)AR = k This equation provides a useful approach to the problem: seek a 1 3~4~35 matrix that transforms A into a dlagonal matrix, the elements of which are the desired eigenvalues.
Finally the angle of rotation has to be determined. The direction cosines of the axis of rotation can be obtained by setting k=1 in the eigenvalue equation and solving for the components of R. It can be shown that the trace of the matrix A
can be used to determine the angle of rotation. One has to compute the trace of A, i.e. T, that is, T= 1 + cos W
from which W can be determined.
For the rotations described above to have any meaning, the fiducial implant lOA, or some point, must be at the same place for the two coordinate systems that are being aligned. This requires a translation of the fiducial implant lOA at a location corresponding to one coordinate system into the location of fiducial implant lOA at the other coordinate system. By simply moving the desired coordinate system the linear amounts of x, y and z, with respect to a cartesion coordinate system, the fiducial implant lOA is situated at the same location. For a more complete discussion of the transformation of a cartesian coordinate system into another, see Herbert Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1965, pp. 107-109.
1 3~4()35 Thus, any point can be obtained with respect to translation and rotation of a given cartesian coordinate system.
Since any point can be obtained, any plane can also be obtained, because a plane is comprised of a set of points. For example, if a given point is desired to be looked at over time, then the coordinate of the point is identified with respect to a first time. The translation and rotation information corresponding to the coordinate system at the first time with respect to the second time is then applied to the point at the first time to indicate the coordinates of the identical point in the coordinate system at the second time. The imaging data pertaining to the second time is then searched to find the desired point. This is but one way of many possible ways to obtain the same point in the coordinate system as a function of time.
Similarly, for a plane or slice image, the same procedure is applied to each point of the set of points that make up the slice image. The desired points are then searched for in the image information corresponding to the coordinate system at the second time. Once all the points, with their associated image information are identified, they are reformatted to produce an image slice as close as possible to the desired image slice pertaining to the coordinate system at the first time. Of course, the position of the slice selected by the physician from the initial image slices has to be determined with respect to the fiducial implants. To this end, preferably, the z coordinates or the elevation coordinates of the system have to be introduced.
This can be done with respect to any slice in the image set. Eor instance, the slice containing the first fiducial implant can be chosen.
Ideally, the reformatting step takes image points from image slices of the second time and aligns them together and produces an image slice as similar as possible to the desired image slice of the first time. In practice, however, quite often a point that is necessary for the creation of a reformatted image does not exist because image slices were taken for instance above and below the point. In this case interpolation must be used to estimate the attributes of the missing point so a desired image slice can be prepared. For example, one simple method of interpolation utilizes the two closest known points to the nonexistent desired point. These two known points are also as nearly opposite each other as possible with the desired point therebetween, and averages their image value. For example, if the intensity of the image associated with one point is 6 units on a scale of 1 to 10 units and that of the second point is 4 units, and the two points are essentially equal in distance from the desired point, the desired point is assigned an image intensity value of 5 units. See Figure 6 which shows the flow chart describing the above overall process.
Interpolation could be avoided if the internal coordinate system is positioned identically at the different times the imaging data is obtained. This could be accomplished by causing the three fiducial implants 10 to be at exactly the same position-whenever imaging data is obtained.- By having, for instance, an X-ray machine, or following the method discussed below that reveals the location of the fiducial implants in the body with respect to an external coordinate system, and knowing where the implants were positioned at the first time that imaging occurred, the body could be moved to be in the same exact location. One way of moving the body in position is with a table or platform that has 3 dimensional movement. Then, knowing where the coordinate system is in the body with respect to the platform, the platform could be moved up, down, forward, backward and/or rotated so the internal coordinate system is positioned exactly the same way it was the first time imaging data was obtained.
To summarize, and referring to Figure 6, the procedure consists of the following steps:
1. Locating the fiducial implants in the initial examination image set, and establishing the internal coordinate system;
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION OF THE INVENTION
This application, being a divisional of Canadian Patent Application Serial Number 581,885 filed November 1, 1988 discloses subject matter claimed in both serial number 581,885 as well as in this application.
Diagnostic techniques that allow the practicing clinician to obtain high fidelity views of the anatomical structure of a human body have proved helpful to both the patient and the doctor. Imaging systems providing cross-sectional views such as computed tomographic (CT) x-ray imagers or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) machines have provided the ability to improve visualization of the anatomical structure of the human body without surgery or other invasive techniques. The patient can be subjected to scanning techniques of such imaging systems, and the patient's anatomical structure can be reproduced in a form for evaluation by a trained doctor.
The doctor sufficiently experienced in these techniques can evaluate the images of the patient's anatomy and determine if there are any abnormalities present. An abnormality in the form of a tumor appears on the image as a shape that has a discernable contrast with the surrounding area. The difference in contrast is due to the tumor having different imaging properties than the surrounding body tissue. Moreover, the contrasting shape that represents the tumor appears at a location on the image where such a shape would not normally appear with regard to a similar image of a healthy person. ~
~ 334035 Once a tumor has been identified, several methods of ~reatment are utilized to remove or destroy the tumor including chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery. When chemotherapy is chosen drugs are introduced into the patient's body to destroy the tumor. During the course of treatment, imagers are commonly used to follow the progress of treatment by subjecting the patient to periodic scans and comparing the images taken over the course of the treatment to ascertain any changes in the tumor configurations.
In radiation therapy, the images of the tumor generated by the imager are used by a radiologist to adjust the irradiating device and to direct radiation solely at the tumor while minimizing or eliminating adverse effects to surrounding healthy tissue. During the course of the radiation treatment, the imaging system is also used to follow the progress of the patient in the same manner described above with respect to chemotherapy.
When surgery is used to remove a tumor, the images of the tumor in the patient can guide the surgeon during the operation. By reviewing the images prior to surgery, the surgeon can decide the best strategy for reaching and excising the tumor.
After surgery has been performed, further scanning is utilized to evaluate the success of the surgery and the subsequent progress of the patient.
A problem associated with the scanning techniques mentioned above is the inability to select and compare accurately the cross section of the same anatomical area in images that have been obtained by imagers at different times or by images obtained essentially at the same time using different image modalities, e.g., CT and MRI. The inaccuracy in image comparison can be better appreciated from an explanation of the scanning techniques and how the imaging systems generate the images within a cross-sectional "slice" of the patient's anatomy. A slice depicts elemental volumes within the cross-section of the patient's anatomy that is exposed or excited by a radiation beam or a magnetic field and the information is recorded on a film or other tangible medium. Since the images are created from slices defined by the relative position of the patient with respect to the imager, a change of the orientation of the patient results in different elemental volumes being introduced into the slice.
Thus, for comparison purposes two sets of approximately the same anatomical mass taken at different times, do not provide comparable information that can be accurately used to determine the changes that occurred between two images in the sets, since it is unknown to what extent the two images selected from the respective sets share common views.
The adverse effects on the medical practice of such errors is exemplified by diagnostic technlques utilized by the surgeon or others in diagnosing a tumor within a patient. If a patient has a tumor, its size density and location can be 1 ~4035 ~etermined with the help of images generated by a scanning device.
~or the clinician to make an assessment of the patient's treatment, two scanning examinations are required. The patient is subjected to an initial scan that generates a number of slices through the portion of the anatomy, for instance the brain, to be diagnosed. During scanning, the patient is held in a substantially fixed position with respect to the imager. Each slice of a particular scan is taken at a predetermined distance from the previous slice and parallel thereto. Using the images of the slices, the doctor can evaluate the tumor. If, however, the doctor wants to assess changes in the configuration of the tumor over a given period of time, a second or "follow-up" scan has to be taken.
The scanning procedure is repeated, but since the patient may be in a position different from that in the original scan, comparison of the scans is hampered. Slices obtained at the follow-up examination may be inadvertently taken at an angle when compared to the original slices. Accordingly the image created may depict a larger volume than that which was actually depicted before. Conseguently, the surgeon may get a false impression of the size of the tumor when comparing scans taken at different periods. Because of this, slice-by-slice comparison cannot be performed satisfactorily.
Similarly for certain surgical techniques it is desirable to have accurate and reliable periodic scans of I ~S4U3S
identical segments of the tumor within the cranial cavity. If the scans before and after surgery are inaccurate, the doctor may not get the correct picture of the result of surgery. These same inaccuracies apply to other treatments such as chemotherapy discussed above.
Additionally, with regard to imaging systems and the integral part they play in surgical and other tumor treatment procedures, there is a dearth of methods currently existing that allow a determination of a desired location within the body at a given time. For example, U.S. Patent 4,583,538 to Onik, et. al.
discloses a localization device that is placed on a patient's skin which can be identified in a slice of a CT scan. A reference point is chosen from a position on the device which exactly correlates to a point on the CT scan. Measurements of the localization device on the CT scan is then correlated to the device on the patient.
Exterior devices have been utilized in an attempt to solve some of these problems with accuracy such as that shown in U.S. Patent 4,341,220 to Perry which discloses a frame that fits over the skull of a patient. The frame has three plates, each defining a plurality of slots on three of four sides. The slots are of varying lengths and are se~uentially ordered with respect to length. Frame coordinates defined and found on the frame correspond to the varying heights of the slots. When slices of the skull and brain are taken by an imaging device, the plane ~ 334035 formed by the slice intersects the three plates. The number of full slots in the slice are counted with respect to each plate to determine the coordinate of a target site with the brain.
Accordingly, only one CT scan is needed to pinpoint the coordinates of the target.
Other attempts have included the use of catheters for insertion into the anatomy. For example, U.S. Patent 4,572,198 to Codington discloses a catheter with a coil winding in its tip to excite or weaken the magnetic field. The weak magnetic field is detectable by an NMR device thus pinpointing the location of the catheter tip with respect to the NMR device.
Applicant's invention largely overcomes many of the deficiencies noted above with regard to imagers used heretofore.
The invention relates to a method and apparatus for insuring that scans taken at different times produce images substantially identical to those of previous scans even if they are from different image modalities at different times. This insures that a more accurate assessment of any changes in anatomy is obtained.
As a result, the doctor can be more certain as to the size, location and density of the tumor, or a section thereof, that is located in the cranial cavity.
This ability will enhance the use of surgical techniques in removing or otherwise eliminating the tumor in particular by those noninvasive techniques such as laser technology. By having ~ 334035 the ability to define accurately the tumor location and size, laser beams can be focused directly on the tumor. Intermittently, as part of surgical techniques, scans can be made to determine if the tumor has moved or substantially changed in size as a result of the surgery. The laser or other surgical instrument can be adjusted accordingly. Because of the accuracy of the imaging techniques produced by the invention, the doctor can be confident that the amount of healthy tissue destroyed during surgery is minimized.
A method adopted by the invention disclosed herein utilizes fiducial implants or implants to define a plane which cooperates with the imager, or other computer, and particularly the data processing capabilities of the imager to insure that subsequent scanning results in slices substantially parallel to those taken during the initial scan. The fiducial implants are implanted beneath the skin into the calvania and are spaced sufficiently from one another to define a plane. The patient with these implants implanted is placed in the scanning device in the conventional manner and scanned to provide the images of consecutive parallel slices of a given thickness along a predetermined path through the cranial cavity.
As the scans are taken, one or more slices will be needed to accommodate part or all of each fiducial implant. The computational features of the imager or other computer will take into account the spatial relationship between any selected plane ~ 334035 of a slice and that plane defined by the fiducial implants.
Because of this capability, images taken in subsequent scans at different points in time, at different angles can be reconstructed to be substantially identical with the slices taken originally.
Fiducial implants for this purpose are specially configured and made of material that enables their implantation into the skull and the ability to be detected by scanning devices.
The fiducial implant as disclosed herein is configured to insure that during implantation it does not have adverse effects on the skull such as cracking or extending through to the cranial cavity.
Nor is it sufficiently exposed between the skull and the skin to distort any external features of the anatomy. Furthermore, the fiducial implant is positioned at least on a portion of the skull at the interface of the skin and the bone of the skull to facilitate its imaging by the imager. At least a portion of the implant is symmetrical in cross-section such that slices taken of the cranial cavity for example can be used to locate the center of mass of the implant. This insures accuracy in using the implant image as a reference point to transform the subsequent slices of the follow-up examination into the proper position and orientation.
The above has been a description of certain deficiencies in the prior art and advantages of the invention. Other advantages may be perceived from the detailed description of the preferred embodiment which follows.
~ 334035 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A more complete appreciation of the present invention and many of the attendant advantages thereof will be readily obtained, as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Figure 1 is a side and overhead view of fiducial implants.
Figure 2 is a side and overhead view of a preferred positioning scheme of fiducial implants in the skull.
Figure 3 is an offset view of two coordinate systems that have undergone translation with respect to each other.
Figure 4 is an offset view of two coordinate systems that have undergone rotation with respect to each other.
Figure 5 and Figures Sa, 5b and 5c are offset views of two coordinate systems that have undergone translation and rotation with respect to each other.
Figure 6 is a flow chart with respect to determining the -same point P~at two different times in an internal coordinate system to the body.
Figure 7 is a side view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 8 is a flow chart with respect to determining the location of a point P in an internal coordinate system with respect to an external coordinate system.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
In FIG. 1, there is shown a fiducial implant lO for the human body that is detectable by an imaging system. The fiducial implant comprises a first portion 12 and a second portion 14. The first portion 12 is configured to be detected by an imaging system (when place beneath the skin.) The second portion 14 is configured for fixed attachment to the bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing the bone. The first portion 12 is sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system and sufficiently small to provide minimal distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone. First portion 12 also has at least a portion which is spherical and defines a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing the second portion 14 to the bone. Additionally, the placement of 1 334~35 -'three fiducial implants 10 into a portion of anatomy of the human body allows for the recreation of a particular image slice of the portion of the anatomy taken by an imaging system in order to duplicate images taken at the first time period, that is, at the initial examination. This provides a doctor with the ability to accurately follow the progress of treatment on selected slices representing the anatomy of interest.
Moreover, the existence of three fiducial implants 10 allows a target (a tumor for instance) to be identified relative to an external coordinate system. The portion of anatomy with the target may then be operated on, for instance, robotically, or precisely irradiated.
To allow for the accurate comparison of image slices from at least two distinct periods of time, the three fiducial implants 10 are first implanted into a body of a patient at a desired region of interest. The patient is then placed in an imaging system and images of a series of cross-sectional slices are obtained that include, for example, the volume of the tumor which is the primary target of interest. From the imaging data obtained, the three fiducial implants are located and an internal coordinate system is defined with respect to them. If it is so desired, the image data may be further reformatted to show image slices whose direction is different from that obtained originally during the imaging period. Depending on the diagnostic information that these image slices reveal, appropriate decisions ~ 334035 with regard to surgery, chemotherapy or radiation therapy on a patient may be made. The imaging data can also be used from several different types of images, such as CT, PET or NMR to obtain the same view of the anatomy but with different qualities stressed.
If it is decided to obtain further imaging data at a later time, then the patient is returned to the imaging system and the procedure for obtaining image data is repeated. The fiducial implants 10 are located with respect to the second imaging session and the same internal coordinate system is defined relative to the implants 10. Once the same internal coordinate system is defined with respect to the second imaging session, the translation and rotation of the internal coordinate system and the images with it is determined with respect to the coordinate system established at the first imaging session. An image slice identified from the first imaging session that is to be used for diagnosis, is recovered from the second imaging session. The two image slices, one from the first image session and one from the second image session, are then compared to determine what changes, if any, have occurred in the anatomy of the patient.
More specifically, a 3-dimensional noncollinear coordlnate system requires three distinct noncollinear points to be fully defined. If there are more than three identifiable points, the system is over-determined and three points have to be chosen to define the coordinate system. If there are less than three identifiable distinct points, the system is undetermined and a position relative to the one or two identifiable points will not be defined.
The known location of three distinct points identlfies a plane upon which an orthogonal coordinate system can be established. If the three points are fixed in place relativé to each other over time in the body, a coordinate system can be established that is also fixed in time. The ability to define a fixed internal coordinate system to the human body over time has important ramifications. A fully defined internal coordinate system that is fixed in place over time with respect to some location in the body permits comparison of subsequent images of the body taken into imaging systems such as CT scans, NMR scans or PET scans, to name a few. More precisely, these comparisons will allow a diagnostician to see what change, if any, has occurred within the body at a predetermined location.
By utilizing a fixed coordinate system relative to the body, the same coordinates can be compared over time. However, the tissue or body material is not necessarily fixed in place relative to a predetermined set of coordinates over time. After the passage of time, the tissue may have shifted, a change not uncommon following surgery. Nevertheless, the ability to compare various properties (depending on the type of images) of the tissue at the same coordinates and at different times is a great advantage for diagnostic purposes.
~ 334035 In principle, the three points-(that are necessary) to define a coordinate system can be chosen in a variety of ways. In one embodiment with respect to the brain or head region, the two ears and a tooth, or the two ears and the nose may comprise the three points. Alternatively, an image slice of the skull could provide a set of points from which the three points would be chosen to create the coordinate system for the body. Preferably, three fiducial points that are implanted into the body, and create high contrast images during scanning, provide the most reliable way to define a coordinate system. Ideally the three points should be in the same approximate area of the body that is under analysis, and also should be identifiable and measureable by different imagery systems, such as CT imagers and NMR imagers.
To create a fully defined coordinate system the detection of three distinct noncollinear fiducial points is required. With respect to creating a fully-defined coordinate system anchored to the human body, the requirement of detection dictates the need that fiducial implants 10 are made of a material that is detectable by a system imaging the human body. The fiducial implant 10 has a first portion 12 that provides means for marking a predetermined position within a body. See Figure 1.
First portion, or marker 12, ideally provides a high contrast in an image compared to the surrounding material. The material marker 12 is made of also provides as little distortion as possible to the image so the appearance of artifacts is kept to a minimum. Marker 12 is also safe for use in the human body and is unobtrusive so no discomfort or sel,f-consciousness is experienced by a wearer.
Marker 12 exhibits symmetrical integrity to facilitate its location by the imaging system. When marker 12 is scanned, the symmetry insures that any plane through the implant provides essentially the same image and the ability to locate its center of mass. The importance of being able to identify the center of the marker 12 lies in the fact that the same exact point can be reproductibly found for use in defining the coordinate system.
Error is thus minimized from subsequent recreations of the same coordinate system due to displacement of the coordinate system from a previous alignment. Eor instance, a sphere is the ideal shape for a marker 12 with respect to symmetrical integrity since the image of any plane of the sphere is always a circle.
By knowing the radius of the spherical object and applying standard algorithms, the center can be determined of the spherical marker 12 from any plane passing through the sphere.
The algorithm for determining the center of a sphere may require operator interaction to mark the approximate location of the implant. The center of mass can be determined with successful approximation from the boundary of the circular profile identified through the operator's interaction. For instance, by having a Priori information about the density distribution of the fiducial implant's image and assuming it has spherical symmetry, then scan profiles through its image result in bell-shaped distributions, the boundaries-of which can be determined therefrom. F~om the boundary points of the center of mass is computed. This may require additional slices depending on the size of the fiducial implant and its relative position with respect to adjacent slices, particularly when the physical size of the implant exceeds that of the scan slice.
When the centers of mass of the 3 fiducials (lOa, lOb, lOc) are determined, then two of them (lOa, lOb) define for instance the x-axis vector of the coordinate system and the vector product of vectors lOa, lOb and lOa, lOc fully determine the coordinate system as shown in Figure 5a which is described more fully below.
Marker 12, which is 1 to 10 and preferably 4 millimeters in diameter, can be made of, for example, titanium in the form of a hollow sphere. The hollow of the sphere can be, for example, filled with agarose gel having various desired dopants, the choice of which depends on the imaging system used to best accent or highlight the marker 12. Marker 12 is intimately connected to a second portion 14 of the fiducial implant 10.
The second portion 14 provides means for anchoring 14 the implant means 12 into the body The site of preference for anchoring the marker 12 in the body is bone, since it provides a good material to hold the implant means in place and also because 1 ~34035 bone stays in a fixed position over time in the body. Anchor 14 is long enough to penetrate into the bone to which it is anchored, and long enough to be firmly embedded without fracturing the bone Anchor 14 is 1 to 10 and preferably 3 millimeters long.
Preferably the anchor 14 should be screwed into the bone, rather than driven with an impact tool to lessen the chance of fracturing the bone. Anchor 14 can also, for example, be made of titanium.
The fiducial implant 10 also has means 16 for receiving force so the anchoring means 14 can be fixedly secured to the body. Where anchoring means 14 is a screw, preferably an indention 16 in the shape of a polygon recess to receive an allen wrench is located in implant means 12. The use of an allen wrench with the associated polygonal recess has more symmetrical integrity than the cross shaped receptor site for a phillips screw driver or a single groove receptor site for a standard screw driver.
The implantation of a fiducial implant 10 having an anchor, in this case a screw 14, preferably utilizes a trocar not shown, to penetrate the skin and reach a desired bone site. The trocar is first placed on the skin over the desired anchoring site and a piercing rod therein is forced through the skin. The piercing rod within the trocar is then removed while the trocar is kept in place. A rod with an allen wrench head fitted to the polygonal indentation 16 in the implant means 12 of the implant 10 is inserted into the trocar until the screw 14 portion of the implant 10 contacts the anchoring site, for instance bone. Force is then applied to the por`tion of the rod extending out the trocar until the implant 10 is embedded into the bone. Such a procedure is accomplished under local anesthesia and should only be about 5 minutes in length.
The placement of the three fiducial implants 10 depends on the portion of the anatomy to be evaluated. Essentially, three fiducial implants 10 are placed in three locations such that they are readily identifiable and the locations are fixed with respect to each other over time. If, for example, a study of the skull and brain is to be undertaken, preferably an implant lOA is placed on the midline of the skull 18 just above the hairline, with the other two implants lOB, lOC being placed on the right and left side, respectively, of the midline in a posterior position to the midline implant lOA. See Figures 2a and 2b which are a frontal and overhead view of the skull 18, respectively. Another example of an area of interest could be the torso, with one fiducial implant 10 placed on the midline of the sternum and the other two fiducial implants 10 placed laterally thereto on the right and left side, respectively, and in a rib. Or, one fiducial implant 10 can be placed in the spinous process of a vertebra in the midline and the other two fiducial implants placed in the right and left illiac crest, respectively.
Imaging apparatus provides a fixed axis relative to which any other position in space can be located. As a result, - ~ 334~
the position of the fiducial marker and the coordinate system these markers define can be located relative to the imaging apparatus. The features of the invention permit the location of the markers relative to the imaging apparatus to be recorded for future reference. In subsequent scans, the patient's orientation may change relative to the imaging apparatus. This new orientation can be measured by locating the fiducial markers in relation to the image apparatus and comparing it to the previously recorded location. The comparison technique permits re-orienting images of subsequent scans to a position corresponding to the earlier recorded scan so that image slices are always at generally the same cross-section of the earlier recorded slices.
In actual operation, these positions are defined by coordinate system and it is the position of these systems that is accomplished translation on rotation as discussed below.
Once the fiducial implants 10 are in place and a coordinate system defined, subsequent images of the same anatomical volume area can be compared. If, for example, images of the brain are being taken, a person's head may be placed below, above or to the side (see Figure 3), of its location at a previous imaging session. The head might be rotated (see Figure 4), as compared to its orientation during an earlier imaging session.
The head might have undergone rotation and translation as compared to a previous imaging session, see Figure 5. Regardless of the reason why the head is oriented differently, by taking advantage ~ 334035 of the fixed fully-defined internal coordinate system in the brain a previous point or slice image of the brain can be obtained from subsequent image information. This is accomplished as shown in Figure 6, by comparing the location and direction of the plane defined by the three fiducial points at the first examination with the location and direction of the same plane defined by the three fiducial points at the time of the second examination. For simplicity, the origin of the coordinate system is located at a given fiducial point. By measuring the distance in say, the x, y and z directions between the same fiducial point (the origins) at the two different times, the translation of the origin of one coordinate system with respect to the other can be obtained.
Preferably, one can carry out the transformation with respect to rotation from a given cartesian coordinate system to another by means of three successful rotations performed in a specific sequence. Three angles known as the Eulerian angles are then defined. These three Eulerian angles are the three successful angles of rotation that are required to carry out the transformation. The determination of the Eulerian angles is accomplished by first computing the intersection of two planes determined by the fiducial implants, then computing the angle between the fiducial x-axis and the line of intersection (psi), then computing the angle theta; and then computing the angle phi At this point the three Eulerian angles are determined. For the example given in Figures 5a, 5b and 5c the sequence that is required to carry out the transformation is started by rotating the initial systems of axes, xyz, by an angle phi counterclockwise about the z axis as shown in Figure 5a. The resul-tant coordinate system is labelled the xi,eta,zeta axes . In the second stage, the intermediate axes, xi,eta,zeta, are rotated about the xi axis counterclockwise by an angle theta to produce another intermediate set, the xi',eta',zeta' axes as shown in Figure 5b where the third fiducial implant lOc is not shown to simplify understanding. The xi' axis is at the intersection of the xy and xi'eta' planes and is known as the line of nodes. Finally the xi',eta',zeta' axes are rotated counterclockwise by an angle psi about the zeta' axis to produce the desired x'y'z' system of axes as shown in Figure 5c. The Eulerian angles theta, phi and psi thus completely specify the orientation of the x'y'z' coordinate system relative to the xyz coordinate system and can therefore act as the three needed generalized coordinates.
The elements of the complete transformation A can be obtained by writing a complete transformation matrix as the triple product of the separate rotations, each of which can be written in matrix form. Thus the initial rotation about the z axis can be described by the matrix D:
xi = Dx where xi and x stand for column matrices. Similarly, the transformation from xi,eta, zeta, to xi',eta',zeta' can be described by the matrix C:
~ 334035 X' = Cxi nd the last rotation to x'y'z' by a matrix B
x' = Bxi' hus the matrix of the complete transformation can be written as x' = Ax hich is the product of the successive matrices:
A = BCD
The matrix D can be written as cos phi sin phi `R
D= -sin phi cos phi `R
`R `R
The matrix C can be written as 1 `R `R
C= `R cos theta sin theta `R -sin theta cos theta The matrix B can be written as cos psi sin psi `R
B= -sin psi cos psi R
`R `R
he product matrix A = BCD is then obtained with the help of the bove expression. The order of the matrix multiplication depends ~ 334035 upon the task identified; in the present case it defines the transformation from the xyz set of axes to the x'y'z' set of axes.
Once the Euler angles are determined, the problem of orientation is solved, at least, in principle. A major simplification of the computation can, however, be achieved if Euler's theorem is implemented.
Euler's theorem on the motion of a rigid body states:
that the general displacement of a rigid body with one point fixed is a rotation about some axis.
If the fixed point is taken as the origin of the body set of axes, then the displacement of the rigid body involves no translation of the body set of axes, the only change is the orientation. The theorem then states that the body set of axes can always be obtained as a single rotation of the initial coordinate system. It is characteristic of rotation that it leaves the direction of rotation unaffected by the operation. In other words, any vector lying in the direction of the axis of rotation must have the same components before and after the rotation. A necessary condition is that the magnitude of the vector should be unaffected and is automatically provided by the orthogonality conditions. Thus Euler's theorem can be proven if it is shown that there exits a vector R having the same component before and after the transformation, that is, in both systems.
From this it follows, that R' = AR = R
The above is an eigenvalue problem that can be written as AR - kR
where k is constant. The values for which k is soluble are called eigenvalues of the matrix.
The eigenvalue equations may be written (A - kl)R = `R
This equation comprises a set of three homogeneous simultaneous equations for the components X,Y,Z of the vector R. Because of this they can never provide the definite values of the three components, only their ratios. Thus the magnitudes of the components remain undetermined. For homogeneous equations the determinant of the above equation has to vanish, and the solution provides the values of k. For the real, orthogonal, matrices the equation must have k=+1.
In general the equation has three roots corresponding to three eigenvectors. The consideration lead to diagonal matrix of k kl `R `R
k= `R k2 `R
R `R k3 The matrix equation can then be written AR = Rk or multiplying from the left by R**(-1) R **(-l)AR = k This equation provides a useful approach to the problem: seek a 1 3~4~35 matrix that transforms A into a dlagonal matrix, the elements of which are the desired eigenvalues.
Finally the angle of rotation has to be determined. The direction cosines of the axis of rotation can be obtained by setting k=1 in the eigenvalue equation and solving for the components of R. It can be shown that the trace of the matrix A
can be used to determine the angle of rotation. One has to compute the trace of A, i.e. T, that is, T= 1 + cos W
from which W can be determined.
For the rotations described above to have any meaning, the fiducial implant lOA, or some point, must be at the same place for the two coordinate systems that are being aligned. This requires a translation of the fiducial implant lOA at a location corresponding to one coordinate system into the location of fiducial implant lOA at the other coordinate system. By simply moving the desired coordinate system the linear amounts of x, y and z, with respect to a cartesion coordinate system, the fiducial implant lOA is situated at the same location. For a more complete discussion of the transformation of a cartesian coordinate system into another, see Herbert Goldstein, Classical Mechanics, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1965, pp. 107-109.
1 3~4()35 Thus, any point can be obtained with respect to translation and rotation of a given cartesian coordinate system.
Since any point can be obtained, any plane can also be obtained, because a plane is comprised of a set of points. For example, if a given point is desired to be looked at over time, then the coordinate of the point is identified with respect to a first time. The translation and rotation information corresponding to the coordinate system at the first time with respect to the second time is then applied to the point at the first time to indicate the coordinates of the identical point in the coordinate system at the second time. The imaging data pertaining to the second time is then searched to find the desired point. This is but one way of many possible ways to obtain the same point in the coordinate system as a function of time.
Similarly, for a plane or slice image, the same procedure is applied to each point of the set of points that make up the slice image. The desired points are then searched for in the image information corresponding to the coordinate system at the second time. Once all the points, with their associated image information are identified, they are reformatted to produce an image slice as close as possible to the desired image slice pertaining to the coordinate system at the first time. Of course, the position of the slice selected by the physician from the initial image slices has to be determined with respect to the fiducial implants. To this end, preferably, the z coordinates or the elevation coordinates of the system have to be introduced.
This can be done with respect to any slice in the image set. Eor instance, the slice containing the first fiducial implant can be chosen.
Ideally, the reformatting step takes image points from image slices of the second time and aligns them together and produces an image slice as similar as possible to the desired image slice of the first time. In practice, however, quite often a point that is necessary for the creation of a reformatted image does not exist because image slices were taken for instance above and below the point. In this case interpolation must be used to estimate the attributes of the missing point so a desired image slice can be prepared. For example, one simple method of interpolation utilizes the two closest known points to the nonexistent desired point. These two known points are also as nearly opposite each other as possible with the desired point therebetween, and averages their image value. For example, if the intensity of the image associated with one point is 6 units on a scale of 1 to 10 units and that of the second point is 4 units, and the two points are essentially equal in distance from the desired point, the desired point is assigned an image intensity value of 5 units. See Figure 6 which shows the flow chart describing the above overall process.
Interpolation could be avoided if the internal coordinate system is positioned identically at the different times the imaging data is obtained. This could be accomplished by causing the three fiducial implants 10 to be at exactly the same position-whenever imaging data is obtained.- By having, for instance, an X-ray machine, or following the method discussed below that reveals the location of the fiducial implants in the body with respect to an external coordinate system, and knowing where the implants were positioned at the first time that imaging occurred, the body could be moved to be in the same exact location. One way of moving the body in position is with a table or platform that has 3 dimensional movement. Then, knowing where the coordinate system is in the body with respect to the platform, the platform could be moved up, down, forward, backward and/or rotated so the internal coordinate system is positioned exactly the same way it was the first time imaging data was obtained.
To summarize, and referring to Figure 6, the procedure consists of the following steps:
1. Locating the fiducial implants in the initial examination image set, and establishing the internal coordinate system;
2. Selection of the slice(s) of interest in the initial set;
3. Determination of the translation distance between the coordinate system determined by the fiducial implants and the selected slice;
1 3 j40:35
1 3 j40:35
4. Localization of the fiducial implants in the follow-up study;
5. Determination of Eulerian angles in the coordinate system;
6. Determination of the coordinates of each point in the transformed slice corresponding to the selected slice in the initial system;
7. Determination of the intensity values at each point using interpolation in the axial direction. (Axial direction is defined as the direction of motion of the imager table).
Although there are many different hardware and software embodiments to implement processing of the image data, each can be divided according to its functioning as follows:
(1) hardware that facilitates fast reconstruction of the cross sectional image;
(2) operator-interactive image display;
(3) storage device for images;
(4) hardcopy capability for images.
One embodiment utilizes the existing computer and its peripherals to generate the reformatted images.
Another embodiment utilizes a stand-alone system, in which the images are fed from the respective imager, and then perform the comparative analysis in the stand-alone system. The whole computer part of the imager must be duplicate essentially, plus various options for data input supplied, in order to accommodate images of all types. Hardcopy capability is also desirable therein, such as a matrix camera, because permanent records are invaluable to the diagnostician.
Whether a stand-alone system or an existing system is modified for implementation of the above described reformatting, the images are preferably stored as files having two parts: (1) the header that contains the patient's demographic data and information on the examination itself, that is, technical parameters of the exposure or image procedure; and (2) the image matrix. These two parts are preferably stored temporarily (for a couple of days, usually) on magnetic disk drives, and then moved to permanent storage medium, such as magnetic tape or floppy disk.
In addition to this file structure a subfile may be added containing the results of the computation (the Euler angles may be added, for instance).
1 334(~35 An apparatus 100 carries out the imaging, signal processing and display necessary to provide images of essentially the same coordinates in the human body which can be compared over time, or to provide the location of targets, such as tumors is shown in Figure 7. Such an apparatus 100 is comprised of an imag,er 102 that supplies imaging data and is controlled by a programmable computer 104. The imaging data is obtained from a source 106 in the imager 102 that is approximately placed about a patient 107 as is well known in the art. The imaging data experiences signal processing, as described above, and the desired images are displayed on display 108. Additionally, operator interaction can be achieved through an operator control panel 110 and the coordinates of a target can be displayed in the coordinates of the target display 112 for radiation therapy applications.
An application that takes advantage of a fully-defined internal coordinate system of the body relates to radiation therapy. For radiation therapy the location of a radioactive beam of an external coordinate system must be related to the internal coordinate system. See Figure 5 where the external coordinate system can be considered the unprimed system and the internal system the primed system. The point P can represent the location of a point of a tumor. In this situation the actual distances and locations of the point P in the primed coordinate system, and the location of the origin `s of the primed coordinate system are important. If the point P is known with respect to the internal ~ 334035 or primed coordinate system, and the primed coordinate system is known with respect to the external or- unprimed coordinate system and the Euler angles of rotation are known, then the location of point P is known with respect to the external coordinate system.
For example and referring to Figure 7, in radiation therapy o`r surgery knowing where the internal coordinate system A is with respect to an external coordinate system B has many uses. In radiation therapy if the location of a tumor is known with respect to the internal coordinate system and the internal coordinate system is known with respect to an external coordinate system having a radiation source 20, such as an x-ray machine for killing cancer cells, then radiation can be applied only to the tumor provided it can concentrate on the volume of the tumor only. This would remove the guess work of a radiotherapist looking at various images of a tumor in a body and estimating where to aim the radiation source so, hopefully, only the tumor is irradiated. The location of a tumor in an internal coordinate system can be identified for instance, by a first imaging session. The data therefrom is stored in a medium that allows its recall when the tumor position is desired to be known and it is not desired to have to retake images of the anatomy.
One way to accomplish the irradiation of a s~ecific location in the body 32, where, for instance, a tumor is located, involves the use of a robot arm 34 whose base 36 can be chosen as the origin (0,0,0) of the external coordinate system B. At the tip 38 of the robot arm 34 is located a sensor 40. The sensor 40 can be a metal detector or an ultrasonic detector or any instrument that can sense the position of a fiducial implant 10 in a body 32. If the fiducial implants 10 are placed in a skull 18 and there is a tumor therein, the sensor 40 in the tip 38 of the robot arm 34 is moved by the arm 34 until it contacts a fiducial implant 10 in the skull 18. The movement of the robot arm 34 is tracked by a computer (not shown) so the position of the sensor 40 relative to the arm's 34 base 36, the origin O of the external coordinate B, is known. The means to track the arm is well known and is accomplished by sensors (not shown) in critical locations of the arm 34, detecting rotation or movement of the joints 42 of the arm 34. By supplying this information to a computer along with the information of the fixed lengths of the structure of the robot arm 34, the tip 38 location of the arm 34 is always known.
When the tip 38 of the arm 34 rests on the fiducial implant 10 in the skull 18, the location of the internal coordinate system A
defined by the fiducial implants 10 is known with respect to the external coordinate system B. Supplying the Euler angles of rotation and the location of the tumor which is known relative to the internal coordinate system A to the computer, provides the ability to determine the location of the tumor in the external coordinate system B. The location of the tumor is known relative to the internal coordinate system through for instance the image data already stored, and the fact that the fiducial implants 10 are also fixed relative to each other once they are in place. The radiation source 30 and where it is aimed is known by the computer relative to the external coordinate system B. The computer, ~ ~3403S
having the information where the tumor is located in the external coordinate system B, can aim the radiation source 30-to precisely irradiate the tumor site in the brain. In general, the location of a point P in the internal coordinate system relative to the external coordinate system is determined when the distance between the origins of the two coordinate systems is known and the Euler angles are known, as described above.
In surgery, the internal coordinate system defined by the three fiducial points can allow, for example, a laser to be followed as it cuts through tissue to a tumor. An imaging system present in the operating theater would be positioned to continually take imaging data that is provided to a computer system which also guides the laser based on the inputted data. As the laser cuts through the tissue, the change in the tissue is apparent through the imaging system and can be followed with respect to the fixed internal coordinate system. When a predetermined position is reached by the laser, or a predetermined portion of tissue has been removed by the laser, the computer controlling the laser and processing the imaging data would discontinue the operation of the laser.
In the operation of the invention, after the fiducial implants are in place in a patient, imaging data is taken at a first time and stored. At distinct intervals in time, for instance about every year thereafter, the patient returns to the location of the imaging system or one similar to it, and undergoes ~ 334035 lollow_up imaging. The most recently received imaging data is then reformatted, as described above, to obtain high fidelity images of the same cross-sections on the body as attained in the earlier session. The images from the latest session are then compared with the earlier session (if there are many earlier sessions they can all be used for comparison purposes) to determine if there have been any significant changes such as progression or regression of an abnormality, such as a tumor. The imaging data collected from various imaging sessions taken at different time intervals can, of course, be compared many ways such as by reformatting images taken at earlier sessions to show an image slice of interest chosen from the latest session, instead of just comparing image slices of a latest session to those of an earlier session. The purpose of the comparisons, as stated earlier can be multifold: (a) either a simple follow-up of the growth of the tumor, without therapy; or (b) verification of therapeutic treatment, such as radiation or chemotherapy or (c) follow-up of surgical treatment.
In the operation of the invention with regard to radiation therapy, the tumor is first identified in the patient's body. The patient is then positioned in the imaging system such that at least the tumor area can be imaged. The imaging system is used to locate the position of the tumor in the internal coordinate system. The image data can, for instance, then be stored for later use so the tumor position is identified without new images having to be obtained every time radiation therapy is ~ 334035 performed. The patient can then be placed before a radiation source, and each time radiation therapy occurs, the information from the imaging session that is stored is supplied to the computer operating the radiation source. The internal coordinate is located with respect to the external coordinate system, for instance by locating one fiducial implant, as described above, with respect to a known position in the external coordinate system. Once the position of the internal coordinate system is known with respect to the external coordinate system, the tumor position is known with respect to the external coordinate system, since the tumor position is already known with respect to the internal coordinate system from the stored imaging information. A
radiation source is then aimed, for example by a computer receiving the imaging and position data, at the tumor in the body.
With respect to surgery, the procedure that is followed to take advantage of the fiducial implants is similar to the procedure described above for radiation therapy. Once the tumor is located with respect to the internal coordinate system, and the location of the internal coordinate system is known with respect to the external coordinate system, the tumor is located with respect to the external coordinate system. Surgical instruments can then be guided to the tumor by the computer with the imaging system placed in an interactive mode therewith. The imaging data that the imaging system constantly feeds the computer allows the computer to track the progress and the extent of the surgery.
1 3S403~
- Obviously, numerous (additional) modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
Although there are many different hardware and software embodiments to implement processing of the image data, each can be divided according to its functioning as follows:
(1) hardware that facilitates fast reconstruction of the cross sectional image;
(2) operator-interactive image display;
(3) storage device for images;
(4) hardcopy capability for images.
One embodiment utilizes the existing computer and its peripherals to generate the reformatted images.
Another embodiment utilizes a stand-alone system, in which the images are fed from the respective imager, and then perform the comparative analysis in the stand-alone system. The whole computer part of the imager must be duplicate essentially, plus various options for data input supplied, in order to accommodate images of all types. Hardcopy capability is also desirable therein, such as a matrix camera, because permanent records are invaluable to the diagnostician.
Whether a stand-alone system or an existing system is modified for implementation of the above described reformatting, the images are preferably stored as files having two parts: (1) the header that contains the patient's demographic data and information on the examination itself, that is, technical parameters of the exposure or image procedure; and (2) the image matrix. These two parts are preferably stored temporarily (for a couple of days, usually) on magnetic disk drives, and then moved to permanent storage medium, such as magnetic tape or floppy disk.
In addition to this file structure a subfile may be added containing the results of the computation (the Euler angles may be added, for instance).
1 334(~35 An apparatus 100 carries out the imaging, signal processing and display necessary to provide images of essentially the same coordinates in the human body which can be compared over time, or to provide the location of targets, such as tumors is shown in Figure 7. Such an apparatus 100 is comprised of an imag,er 102 that supplies imaging data and is controlled by a programmable computer 104. The imaging data is obtained from a source 106 in the imager 102 that is approximately placed about a patient 107 as is well known in the art. The imaging data experiences signal processing, as described above, and the desired images are displayed on display 108. Additionally, operator interaction can be achieved through an operator control panel 110 and the coordinates of a target can be displayed in the coordinates of the target display 112 for radiation therapy applications.
An application that takes advantage of a fully-defined internal coordinate system of the body relates to radiation therapy. For radiation therapy the location of a radioactive beam of an external coordinate system must be related to the internal coordinate system. See Figure 5 where the external coordinate system can be considered the unprimed system and the internal system the primed system. The point P can represent the location of a point of a tumor. In this situation the actual distances and locations of the point P in the primed coordinate system, and the location of the origin `s of the primed coordinate system are important. If the point P is known with respect to the internal ~ 334035 or primed coordinate system, and the primed coordinate system is known with respect to the external or- unprimed coordinate system and the Euler angles of rotation are known, then the location of point P is known with respect to the external coordinate system.
For example and referring to Figure 7, in radiation therapy o`r surgery knowing where the internal coordinate system A is with respect to an external coordinate system B has many uses. In radiation therapy if the location of a tumor is known with respect to the internal coordinate system and the internal coordinate system is known with respect to an external coordinate system having a radiation source 20, such as an x-ray machine for killing cancer cells, then radiation can be applied only to the tumor provided it can concentrate on the volume of the tumor only. This would remove the guess work of a radiotherapist looking at various images of a tumor in a body and estimating where to aim the radiation source so, hopefully, only the tumor is irradiated. The location of a tumor in an internal coordinate system can be identified for instance, by a first imaging session. The data therefrom is stored in a medium that allows its recall when the tumor position is desired to be known and it is not desired to have to retake images of the anatomy.
One way to accomplish the irradiation of a s~ecific location in the body 32, where, for instance, a tumor is located, involves the use of a robot arm 34 whose base 36 can be chosen as the origin (0,0,0) of the external coordinate system B. At the tip 38 of the robot arm 34 is located a sensor 40. The sensor 40 can be a metal detector or an ultrasonic detector or any instrument that can sense the position of a fiducial implant 10 in a body 32. If the fiducial implants 10 are placed in a skull 18 and there is a tumor therein, the sensor 40 in the tip 38 of the robot arm 34 is moved by the arm 34 until it contacts a fiducial implant 10 in the skull 18. The movement of the robot arm 34 is tracked by a computer (not shown) so the position of the sensor 40 relative to the arm's 34 base 36, the origin O of the external coordinate B, is known. The means to track the arm is well known and is accomplished by sensors (not shown) in critical locations of the arm 34, detecting rotation or movement of the joints 42 of the arm 34. By supplying this information to a computer along with the information of the fixed lengths of the structure of the robot arm 34, the tip 38 location of the arm 34 is always known.
When the tip 38 of the arm 34 rests on the fiducial implant 10 in the skull 18, the location of the internal coordinate system A
defined by the fiducial implants 10 is known with respect to the external coordinate system B. Supplying the Euler angles of rotation and the location of the tumor which is known relative to the internal coordinate system A to the computer, provides the ability to determine the location of the tumor in the external coordinate system B. The location of the tumor is known relative to the internal coordinate system through for instance the image data already stored, and the fact that the fiducial implants 10 are also fixed relative to each other once they are in place. The radiation source 30 and where it is aimed is known by the computer relative to the external coordinate system B. The computer, ~ ~3403S
having the information where the tumor is located in the external coordinate system B, can aim the radiation source 30-to precisely irradiate the tumor site in the brain. In general, the location of a point P in the internal coordinate system relative to the external coordinate system is determined when the distance between the origins of the two coordinate systems is known and the Euler angles are known, as described above.
In surgery, the internal coordinate system defined by the three fiducial points can allow, for example, a laser to be followed as it cuts through tissue to a tumor. An imaging system present in the operating theater would be positioned to continually take imaging data that is provided to a computer system which also guides the laser based on the inputted data. As the laser cuts through the tissue, the change in the tissue is apparent through the imaging system and can be followed with respect to the fixed internal coordinate system. When a predetermined position is reached by the laser, or a predetermined portion of tissue has been removed by the laser, the computer controlling the laser and processing the imaging data would discontinue the operation of the laser.
In the operation of the invention, after the fiducial implants are in place in a patient, imaging data is taken at a first time and stored. At distinct intervals in time, for instance about every year thereafter, the patient returns to the location of the imaging system or one similar to it, and undergoes ~ 334035 lollow_up imaging. The most recently received imaging data is then reformatted, as described above, to obtain high fidelity images of the same cross-sections on the body as attained in the earlier session. The images from the latest session are then compared with the earlier session (if there are many earlier sessions they can all be used for comparison purposes) to determine if there have been any significant changes such as progression or regression of an abnormality, such as a tumor. The imaging data collected from various imaging sessions taken at different time intervals can, of course, be compared many ways such as by reformatting images taken at earlier sessions to show an image slice of interest chosen from the latest session, instead of just comparing image slices of a latest session to those of an earlier session. The purpose of the comparisons, as stated earlier can be multifold: (a) either a simple follow-up of the growth of the tumor, without therapy; or (b) verification of therapeutic treatment, such as radiation or chemotherapy or (c) follow-up of surgical treatment.
In the operation of the invention with regard to radiation therapy, the tumor is first identified in the patient's body. The patient is then positioned in the imaging system such that at least the tumor area can be imaged. The imaging system is used to locate the position of the tumor in the internal coordinate system. The image data can, for instance, then be stored for later use so the tumor position is identified without new images having to be obtained every time radiation therapy is ~ 334035 performed. The patient can then be placed before a radiation source, and each time radiation therapy occurs, the information from the imaging session that is stored is supplied to the computer operating the radiation source. The internal coordinate is located with respect to the external coordinate system, for instance by locating one fiducial implant, as described above, with respect to a known position in the external coordinate system. Once the position of the internal coordinate system is known with respect to the external coordinate system, the tumor position is known with respect to the external coordinate system, since the tumor position is already known with respect to the internal coordinate system from the stored imaging information. A
radiation source is then aimed, for example by a computer receiving the imaging and position data, at the tumor in the body.
With respect to surgery, the procedure that is followed to take advantage of the fiducial implants is similar to the procedure described above for radiation therapy. Once the tumor is located with respect to the internal coordinate system, and the location of the internal coordinate system is known with respect to the external coordinate system, the tumor is located with respect to the external coordinate system. Surgical instruments can then be guided to the tumor by the computer with the imaging system placed in an interactive mode therewith. The imaging data that the imaging system constantly feeds the computer allows the computer to track the progress and the extent of the surgery.
1 3S403~
- Obviously, numerous (additional) modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
Claims (6)
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. A fiducial implant for the human body comprising:
a. a first portion and a second portion, said first portion configured to be detected by an imaging system;
b. said second portion configured for fixed attachment to a bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing said bone;
c. said first portion being sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system, and sufficiently small to provide minimal distortion of the skin when placed at the interface between the skin and the bone; and d. said first portion having at least a portion which is spherical and defining a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing said second portion to the bone.
a. a first portion and a second portion, said first portion configured to be detected by an imaging system;
b. said second portion configured for fixed attachment to a bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing said bone;
c. said first portion being sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system, and sufficiently small to provide minimal distortion of the skin when placed at the interface between the skin and the bone; and d. said first portion having at least a portion which is spherical and defining a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing said second portion to the bone.
2. A fiducial implant for the human body comprising:
a. a first portion substantially spherical in configuration and consisting of a material for detection by an imaging system when placed beneath the skin, said first portion also defining a recess having polygonal internal sides for engagement by an Allen head tool;
b. said implant having a second portion including a screw having a length sufficiently long to secure the implant to a bone, but being configured so as not to penetrate the bone entirely and not to fracture the bone when attached thereto;
c. said spherical first portion being sufficiently small to provide minimal distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone, and said screw fully threaded into the bone; and d. said screw having a length between 1 and 10 millimeters and said spherical first portion having an effective diameter of between about 1 and 10 millimeters.
a. a first portion substantially spherical in configuration and consisting of a material for detection by an imaging system when placed beneath the skin, said first portion also defining a recess having polygonal internal sides for engagement by an Allen head tool;
b. said implant having a second portion including a screw having a length sufficiently long to secure the implant to a bone, but being configured so as not to penetrate the bone entirely and not to fracture the bone when attached thereto;
c. said spherical first portion being sufficiently small to provide minimal distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone, and said screw fully threaded into the bone; and d. said screw having a length between 1 and 10 millimeters and said spherical first portion having an effective diameter of between about 1 and 10 millimeters.
3. A system of three fiducial implants wherein each implant comprises:
a. a first portion and a second portion, said first portion configured to be detected by an imaging system when placed beneath the skin;
b. said second portion configured for fixed attachment to a bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing said bone;
c. said first portion being sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system, and sufficiently small to provide minimal the distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone; and d. said first portion having at least a portion which is spherical and defining a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing said second portion to the bone.
a. a first portion and a second portion, said first portion configured to be detected by an imaging system when placed beneath the skin;
b. said second portion configured for fixed attachment to a bone beneath the skin without penetrating entirely through the bone and without fracturing said bone;
c. said first portion being sufficiently large and comprised of a material for detection by an imaging system, and sufficiently small to provide minimal the distortion of the skin when placed at an interface between the skin and the bone; and d. said first portion having at least a portion which is spherical and defining a surface for cooperating with a tool for securing said second portion to the bone.
4. A method for implanting a fiducial implant into a patient comprising the steps of:
(a) placing a trocar with a piercing rod therein over a desired anchoring site; forcing the piercing rod through the skin so the trocar enters the skin; removing the piercing rod from the trocar which remains in place;
(b) inserting a rod with a fiducial implant into the trocar such that the fiducial implant is positioned on the desired anchoring site; and c. inserting the fiducial implant into the anchoring site by applying force to the rod with the fiducial implant so the fiducial implant is fixedly inserted into the anchoring site; and removing the rod and trocar from the patient.
(a) placing a trocar with a piercing rod therein over a desired anchoring site; forcing the piercing rod through the skin so the trocar enters the skin; removing the piercing rod from the trocar which remains in place;
(b) inserting a rod with a fiducial implant into the trocar such that the fiducial implant is positioned on the desired anchoring site; and c. inserting the fiducial implant into the anchoring site by applying force to the rod with the fiducial implant so the fiducial implant is fixedly inserted into the anchoring site; and removing the rod and trocar from the patient.
5. The method according to claim 4 including before the piercing step the step of anesthesizing the patient.
6. The method according to claim 5 including after the step of removing the trocar and rod the step of repeating, at least twice the steps of piercing, placing and inserting so three fiducial implants are anchored into the skull at three noncollinear and distinct sites in the skull.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CA000616562A CA1334035C (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1993-01-20 | Fiducial implant and method of using the same |
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US07/119,353 US4991579A (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1987-11-10 | Method and apparatus for providing related images over time of a portion of the anatomy using fiducial implants |
US119,353 | 1987-11-10 | ||
CA000581885A CA1317036C (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1988-11-01 | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy |
CA000616562A CA1334035C (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1993-01-20 | Fiducial implant and method of using the same |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000581885A Division CA1317036C (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1988-11-01 | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CA1334035C true CA1334035C (en) | 1995-01-17 |
Family
ID=22383939
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000581885A Expired - Fee Related CA1317036C (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1988-11-01 | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy |
CA000616562A Expired - Fee Related CA1334035C (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1993-01-20 | Fiducial implant and method of using the same |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CA000581885A Expired - Fee Related CA1317036C (en) | 1987-11-10 | 1988-11-01 | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy |
Country Status (11)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (9) | US4991579A (en) |
JP (1) | JP2732618B2 (en) |
AU (6) | AU2459388A (en) |
BR (1) | BR8805881A (en) |
CA (2) | CA1317036C (en) |
DE (1) | DE3838011C2 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2013810A6 (en) |
FR (1) | FR2627075B1 (en) |
GB (3) | GB2212371B (en) |
IT (1) | IT1227797B (en) |
SE (1) | SE8804056L (en) |
Families Citing this family (507)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6603988B2 (en) * | 2001-04-13 | 2003-08-05 | Kelsey, Inc. | Apparatus and method for delivering ablative laser energy and determining the volume of tumor mass destroyed |
US5165410A (en) | 1987-05-15 | 1992-11-24 | Medical & Scientific Enterprises, Inc. | Position indicating system for a multidiagnostic scanner |
DE3717871C3 (en) * | 1987-05-27 | 1995-05-04 | Georg Prof Dr Schloendorff | Method and device for reproducible visual representation of a surgical intervention |
US4991579A (en) * | 1987-11-10 | 1991-02-12 | Allen George S | Method and apparatus for providing related images over time of a portion of the anatomy using fiducial implants |
GB8728150D0 (en) | 1987-12-02 | 1988-01-06 | Inst Of Neurology Queen Square | Head fixation apparatus |
US5251127A (en) * | 1988-02-01 | 1993-10-05 | Faro Medical Technologies Inc. | Computer-aided surgery apparatus |
US6331180B1 (en) | 1988-05-03 | 2001-12-18 | Sherwood Services Ag | Target-centered stereotaxtic surgical arc system with reorientatable arc axis |
US5218964A (en) * | 1988-10-21 | 1993-06-15 | Instrumentarium Corp. | Method for providing accurate reference markers in magnetic resonance images |
FR2639211A1 (en) * | 1988-11-18 | 1990-05-25 | Hennson Int | METHOD FOR CORRELATION OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL INPUTS OF HUMAN ORGANS AND DEVICE FOR IMPLEMENTING THE SAME |
US5417212A (en) * | 1988-11-21 | 1995-05-23 | Szeles; Josef C. | Apparatus for determining the location of receptor regions |
US5099846A (en) * | 1988-12-23 | 1992-03-31 | Hardy Tyrone L | Method and apparatus for video presentation from a variety of scanner imaging sources |
FR2652928B1 (en) | 1989-10-05 | 1994-07-29 | Diadix Sa | INTERACTIVE LOCAL INTERVENTION SYSTEM WITHIN A AREA OF A NON-HOMOGENEOUS STRUCTURE. |
ES2085885T3 (en) * | 1989-11-08 | 1996-06-16 | George S Allen | MECHANICAL ARM FOR INTERACTIVE SURGERY SYSTEM DIRECTED BY IMAGES. |
CA2028065C (en) * | 1989-11-15 | 1996-06-11 | George S. Allen | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy |
US5222499A (en) * | 1989-11-15 | 1993-06-29 | Allen George S | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy |
WO1991015829A1 (en) * | 1990-04-11 | 1991-10-17 | Washington University | Method and apparatus for creating a single composite image of a plurality of separate radiographic images |
US5086401A (en) * | 1990-05-11 | 1992-02-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Image-directed robotic system for precise robotic surgery including redundant consistency checking |
US5207223A (en) * | 1990-10-19 | 1993-05-04 | Accuray, Inc. | Apparatus for and method of performing stereotaxic surgery |
US6347240B1 (en) | 1990-10-19 | 2002-02-12 | St. Louis University | System and method for use in displaying images of a body part |
DE69132412T2 (en) * | 1990-10-19 | 2001-03-01 | Univ St Louis | LOCALIZATION SYSTEM FOR A SURGICAL PROBE FOR USE ON THE HEAD |
AT399273B (en) * | 1990-11-26 | 1995-04-25 | Truppe Michael | Arrangement for three-dimensional detection of joint movements |
AT399272B (en) * | 1990-11-26 | 1995-04-25 | Truppe Michael | Arrangement for displaying a skull |
US5662111A (en) | 1991-01-28 | 1997-09-02 | Cosman; Eric R. | Process of stereotactic optical navigation |
US6006126A (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 1999-12-21 | Cosman; Eric R. | System and method for stereotactic registration of image scan data |
US6167295A (en) * | 1991-01-28 | 2000-12-26 | Radionics, Inc. | Optical and computer graphic stereotactic localizer |
US6405072B1 (en) | 1991-01-28 | 2002-06-11 | Sherwood Services Ag | Apparatus and method for determining a location of an anatomical target with reference to a medical apparatus |
US6675040B1 (en) | 1991-01-28 | 2004-01-06 | Sherwood Services Ag | Optical object tracking system |
US5480439A (en) * | 1991-02-13 | 1996-01-02 | Lunar Corporation | Method for periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement |
US5228068A (en) * | 1992-09-14 | 1993-07-13 | Lunar Corporation | Device and method for automated determination and analysis of bone density and vertebral morphology |
US5306306A (en) * | 1991-02-13 | 1994-04-26 | Lunar Corporation | Method for periprosthetic bone mineral density measurement |
EP0504027A3 (en) * | 1991-03-15 | 1993-04-21 | Centro De Neurociencias De Cuba | Method and system for three-dimensional tomography of activity and connectivity of brain and heart electromagnetic waves generators |
GB9110778D0 (en) * | 1991-05-18 | 1991-07-10 | Middleton Jeffrey K | Apparatus for use in surgery |
US5417210A (en) | 1992-05-27 | 1995-05-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | System and method for augmentation of endoscopic surgery |
US5279309A (en) * | 1991-06-13 | 1994-01-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Signaling device and method for monitoring positions in a surgical operation |
US5249581A (en) * | 1991-07-15 | 1993-10-05 | Horbal Mark T | Precision bone alignment |
US5300080A (en) * | 1991-11-01 | 1994-04-05 | David Clayman | Stereotactic instrument guided placement |
US5330485A (en) * | 1991-11-01 | 1994-07-19 | Clayman David A | Cerebral instrument guide frame and procedures utilizing it |
ATE155059T1 (en) | 1992-01-21 | 1997-07-15 | Stanford Res Inst Int | TELEOPERATOR SYSTEM AND TELEPRESENCE METHOD |
US6788999B2 (en) | 1992-01-21 | 2004-09-07 | Sri International, Inc. | Surgical system |
US6963792B1 (en) | 1992-01-21 | 2005-11-08 | Sri International | Surgical method |
US5389101A (en) * | 1992-04-21 | 1995-02-14 | University Of Utah | Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization |
US5603318A (en) * | 1992-04-21 | 1997-02-18 | University Of Utah Research Foundation | Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization |
JPH05305073A (en) * | 1992-05-01 | 1993-11-19 | Olympus Optical Co Ltd | Position detection display device for insertion tool |
US6122341A (en) * | 1992-06-12 | 2000-09-19 | Butler; William E. | System for determining target positions in the body observed in CT image data |
US5295488A (en) * | 1992-08-05 | 1994-03-22 | General Electric Company | Method and apparatus for projecting diagnostic images from volumed diagnostic data |
US5524180A (en) * | 1992-08-10 | 1996-06-04 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Automated endoscope system for optimal positioning |
US7074179B2 (en) | 1992-08-10 | 2006-07-11 | Intuitive Surgical Inc | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures |
US5657429A (en) | 1992-08-10 | 1997-08-12 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Automated endoscope system optimal positioning |
US5762458A (en) | 1996-02-20 | 1998-06-09 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures |
US6757557B1 (en) | 1992-08-14 | 2004-06-29 | British Telecommunications | Position location system |
WO1994004938A1 (en) * | 1992-08-14 | 1994-03-03 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Position location system |
DE4233978C1 (en) * | 1992-10-08 | 1994-04-21 | Leibinger Gmbh | Body marking device for medical examinations |
US5517990A (en) * | 1992-11-30 | 1996-05-21 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Stereotaxy wand and tool guide |
US5730130A (en) * | 1993-02-12 | 1998-03-24 | Johnson & Johnson Professional, Inc. | Localization cap for fiducial markers |
US5575794A (en) * | 1993-02-12 | 1996-11-19 | Walus; Richard L. | Tool for implanting a fiducial marker |
US5799099A (en) * | 1993-02-12 | 1998-08-25 | George S. Allen | Automatic technique for localizing externally attached fiducial markers in volume images of the head |
US5361766A (en) * | 1993-02-17 | 1994-11-08 | David Nichols | Quick release bone probe and x-ray marker |
US5412880A (en) * | 1993-02-23 | 1995-05-09 | Faro Technologies Inc. | Method of constructing a 3-dimensional map of a measurable quantity using three dimensional coordinate measuring apparatus |
US6535794B1 (en) | 1993-02-23 | 2003-03-18 | Faro Technologoies Inc. | Method of generating an error map for calibration of a robot or multi-axis machining center |
DE4306277C2 (en) * | 1993-03-01 | 2000-11-02 | Leibinger Gmbh | Operation marking tool |
US5787886A (en) * | 1993-03-19 | 1998-08-04 | Compass International Incorporated | Magnetic field digitizer for stereotatic surgery |
IL109385A (en) | 1993-04-22 | 1998-03-10 | Pixsys | System for locating the relative positions of objects in three dimensional space |
CA2161430C (en) | 1993-04-26 | 2001-07-03 | Richard D. Bucholz | System and method for indicating the position of a surgical probe |
US5373844A (en) * | 1993-06-14 | 1994-12-20 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Inverse treatment planning method and apparatus for stereotactic radiosurgery |
FR2709656B1 (en) * | 1993-09-07 | 1995-12-01 | Deemed Int Sa | Installation for computer-assisted microsurgery operation and methods implemented by said installation. |
US5590655A (en) * | 1993-09-20 | 1997-01-07 | Hussman; Karl L. | Frameless laser guided stereotactic localization system |
AU746410B2 (en) * | 1993-10-06 | 2002-05-02 | Biosense, Inc. | Magnetic determination of position and orientation |
US5558091A (en) * | 1993-10-06 | 1996-09-24 | Biosense, Inc. | Magnetic determination of position and orientation |
US5464411A (en) * | 1993-11-02 | 1995-11-07 | Loma Linda University Medical Center | Vacuum-assisted fixation apparatus |
US5549616A (en) * | 1993-11-02 | 1996-08-27 | Loma Linda University Medical Center | Vacuum-assisted stereotactic fixation system with patient-activated switch |
EP0664642B1 (en) * | 1994-01-20 | 2002-07-24 | Omron Corporation | Image processing device for identifying an input image, and copier including same |
JPH07216157A (en) * | 1994-01-28 | 1995-08-15 | Chisso Corp | Crystalline polyolefin composition |
GB9405299D0 (en) * | 1994-03-17 | 1994-04-27 | Roke Manor Research | Improvements in or relating to video-based systems for computer assisted surgery and localisation |
US5817017A (en) * | 1994-04-12 | 1998-10-06 | Pharmacyclics, Inc. | Medical devices and materials having enhanced magnetic images visibility |
DE4417944A1 (en) * | 1994-05-21 | 1995-11-23 | Zeiss Carl Fa | Process for correlating different coordinate systems in computer-assisted, stereotactic surgery |
US5510977A (en) * | 1994-08-02 | 1996-04-23 | Faro Technologies Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring features of a part or item |
DE69531994T2 (en) | 1994-09-15 | 2004-07-22 | OEC Medical Systems, Inc., Boston | SYSTEM FOR POSITION DETECTION BY MEANS OF A REFERENCE UNIT ATTACHED TO A PATIENT'S HEAD FOR USE IN THE MEDICAL AREA |
US5829444A (en) * | 1994-09-15 | 1998-11-03 | Visualization Technology, Inc. | Position tracking and imaging system for use in medical applications |
US6463361B1 (en) | 1994-09-22 | 2002-10-08 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Speech interface for an automated endoscopic system |
US7053752B2 (en) * | 1996-08-06 | 2006-05-30 | Intuitive Surgical | General purpose distributed operating room control system |
US6646541B1 (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 2003-11-11 | Computer Motion, Inc. | General purpose distributed operating room control system |
DE4434519A1 (en) * | 1994-09-27 | 1996-03-28 | Brainlab Med Computersyst Gmbh | Fixing pin for fixing reference system in bone structure, esp. for head ring for neurosurgery |
US5695501A (en) | 1994-09-30 | 1997-12-09 | Ohio Medical Instrument Company, Inc. | Apparatus for neurosurgical stereotactic procedures |
US5891157A (en) * | 1994-09-30 | 1999-04-06 | Ohio Medical Instrument Company, Inc. | Apparatus for surgical stereotactic procedures |
US6978166B2 (en) * | 1994-10-07 | 2005-12-20 | Saint Louis University | System for use in displaying images of a body part |
CA2201877C (en) | 1994-10-07 | 2004-06-08 | Richard D. Bucholz | Surgical navigation systems including reference and localization frames |
US5588430A (en) * | 1995-02-14 | 1996-12-31 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Inc. | Repeat fixation for frameless stereotactic procedure |
DE19506197A1 (en) * | 1995-02-23 | 1996-09-05 | Aesculap Ag | Method and device for determining the location of a body part |
US5649956A (en) | 1995-06-07 | 1997-07-22 | Sri International | System and method for releasably holding a surgical instrument |
US6333971B2 (en) | 1995-06-07 | 2001-12-25 | George S. Allen | Fiducial marker |
US5814038A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1998-09-29 | Sri International | Surgical manipulator for a telerobotic system |
US5592939A (en) | 1995-06-14 | 1997-01-14 | Martinelli; Michael A. | Method and system for navigating a catheter probe |
US5810007A (en) * | 1995-07-26 | 1998-09-22 | Associates Of The Joint Center For Radiation Therapy, Inc. | Ultrasound localization and image fusion for the treatment of prostate cancer |
US6256529B1 (en) | 1995-07-26 | 2001-07-03 | Burdette Medical Systems, Inc. | Virtual reality 3D visualization for surgical procedures |
US6714841B1 (en) | 1995-09-15 | 2004-03-30 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Head cursor control interface for an automated endoscope system for optimal positioning |
US6351659B1 (en) | 1995-09-28 | 2002-02-26 | Brainlab Med. Computersysteme Gmbh | Neuro-navigation system |
US5769861A (en) * | 1995-09-28 | 1998-06-23 | Brainlab Med. Computersysteme Gmbh | Method and devices for localizing an instrument |
DE19536180C2 (en) * | 1995-09-28 | 2003-05-08 | Brainlab Ag | Methods and devices for locating an instrument |
US6436107B1 (en) | 1996-02-20 | 2002-08-20 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures |
US6699177B1 (en) | 1996-02-20 | 2004-03-02 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive surgical procedures |
US5855583A (en) * | 1996-02-20 | 1999-01-05 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures |
US5636255A (en) * | 1996-03-05 | 1997-06-03 | Queen's University At Kingston | Method and apparatus for CT image registration |
US6167145A (en) | 1996-03-29 | 2000-12-26 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Bone navigation system |
DE29608321U1 (en) * | 1996-05-08 | 1996-08-08 | Aesculap Ag | Marker element |
DE19618945C2 (en) * | 1996-05-10 | 2003-02-27 | Phonak Ag Staefa | Fixable positioning system for a firm, play-free connection to the human skull |
DE69720150T2 (en) * | 1996-05-29 | 2004-01-08 | Northern Digital Inc., Waterloo | SCREEN-CONTROLLED SURGICAL SYSTEM |
US6496099B2 (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 2002-12-17 | Computer Motion, Inc. | General purpose distributed operating room control system |
US6911916B1 (en) * | 1996-06-24 | 2005-06-28 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Method and apparatus for accessing medical data over a network |
US5853366A (en) * | 1996-07-08 | 1998-12-29 | Kelsey, Inc. | Marker element for interstitial treatment and localizing device and method using same |
US6408107B1 (en) | 1996-07-10 | 2002-06-18 | Michael I. Miller | Rapid convolution based large deformation image matching via landmark and volume imagery |
US6226418B1 (en) | 1997-11-07 | 2001-05-01 | Washington University | Rapid convolution based large deformation image matching via landmark and volume imagery |
WO1998002091A1 (en) * | 1996-07-11 | 1998-01-22 | The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University | High-speed inter-modality image registration via iterative feature matching |
US6296613B1 (en) | 1997-08-22 | 2001-10-02 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | 3D ultrasound recording device |
US5980535A (en) * | 1996-09-30 | 1999-11-09 | Picker International, Inc. | Apparatus for anatomical tracking |
EP0832610A3 (en) | 1996-09-30 | 1999-06-16 | Picker International, Inc. | Trackable guide for surgical tool |
US6132441A (en) | 1996-11-22 | 2000-10-17 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Rigidly-linked articulating wrist with decoupled motion transmission |
US7302288B1 (en) | 1996-11-25 | 2007-11-27 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Tool position indicator |
DE19703556A1 (en) * | 1997-01-31 | 1998-08-06 | Philips Patentverwaltung | Method and arrangement for determining the position in X-ray imaging |
US5906609A (en) * | 1997-02-05 | 1999-05-25 | Sahar Technologies | Method for delivering energy within continuous outline |
US5938657A (en) * | 1997-02-05 | 1999-08-17 | Sahar Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for delivering energy within continuous outline |
WO1998036371A1 (en) | 1997-02-13 | 1998-08-20 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | Method and system for registering the position of a surgical system with a preoperative bone image |
SE511291C2 (en) * | 1997-03-18 | 1999-09-06 | Anders Widmark | Procedure, arrangement and reference organ for radiation therapy |
US6669653B2 (en) * | 1997-05-05 | 2003-12-30 | Trig Medical Ltd. | Method and apparatus for monitoring the progress of labor |
US6752812B1 (en) | 1997-05-15 | 2004-06-22 | Regent Of The University Of Minnesota | Remote actuation of trajectory guide |
US6093141A (en) * | 1997-07-17 | 2000-07-25 | Hadasit Medical Research And Development Company Ltd. | Stereotactic radiotreatment and prevention |
US20040236352A1 (en) * | 1997-09-22 | 2004-11-25 | Yulun Wang | Method and apparatus for performing minimally invasive cardiac procedures |
US6226548B1 (en) | 1997-09-24 | 2001-05-01 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Percutaneous registration apparatus and method for use in computer-assisted surgical navigation |
DE69828011T2 (en) | 1997-09-26 | 2005-12-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Device for holding a surgical instrument |
US6021343A (en) | 1997-11-20 | 2000-02-01 | Surgical Navigation Technologies | Image guided awl/tap/screwdriver |
AU4318499A (en) * | 1997-11-24 | 1999-12-13 | Burdette Medical Systems, Inc. | Real time brachytherapy spatial registration and visualization system |
US6011987A (en) * | 1997-12-08 | 2000-01-04 | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Fiducial positioning cup |
US6348058B1 (en) * | 1997-12-12 | 2002-02-19 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Image guided spinal surgery guide, system, and method for use thereof |
US6228089B1 (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2001-05-08 | Depuy International Limited | Device for positioning and guiding a surgical instrument during orthopaedic interventions |
US5957934A (en) * | 1997-12-22 | 1999-09-28 | Uri Rapoport | Method and apparatus for guiding a penetrating tool into a three-dimensional object |
US20030036746A1 (en) | 2001-08-16 | 2003-02-20 | Avi Penner | Devices for intrabody delivery of molecules and systems and methods utilizing same |
DE69937286D1 (en) * | 1998-01-14 | 2007-11-22 | Leonard Reiffel | ARRANGEMENT FOR STABILIZING BODY INTERNAL RADIATION GROUNDING SURFACES |
US6120540A (en) * | 1998-01-21 | 2000-09-19 | Apple; Marc G. | Radio prosthesis |
US6273896B1 (en) | 1998-04-21 | 2001-08-14 | Neutar, Llc | Removable frames for stereotactic localization |
US6546277B1 (en) | 1998-04-21 | 2003-04-08 | Neutar L.L.C. | Instrument guidance system for spinal and other surgery |
US6529765B1 (en) | 1998-04-21 | 2003-03-04 | Neutar L.L.C. | Instrumented and actuated guidance fixture for sterotactic surgery |
US6298262B1 (en) | 1998-04-21 | 2001-10-02 | Neutar, Llc | Instrument guidance for stereotactic surgery |
WO1999059106A1 (en) * | 1998-05-13 | 1999-11-18 | Acuscape International, Inc. | Method and apparatus for generating 3d models from medical images |
US6363940B1 (en) * | 1998-05-14 | 2002-04-02 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | System and method for bracketing and removing tissue |
EP2289423A1 (en) | 1998-05-14 | 2011-03-02 | David N. Krag | System for bracketing tissue |
CA2335867C (en) | 1998-06-22 | 2008-12-30 | Synthes (U.S.A.) | Fiducial matching by means of fiducial screws |
US6118845A (en) | 1998-06-29 | 2000-09-12 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | System and methods for the reduction and elimination of image artifacts in the calibration of X-ray imagers |
US6459927B1 (en) * | 1999-07-06 | 2002-10-01 | Neutar, Llc | Customizable fixture for patient positioning |
US6327491B1 (en) * | 1998-07-06 | 2001-12-04 | Neutar, Llc | Customized surgical fixture |
US6351662B1 (en) | 1998-08-12 | 2002-02-26 | Neutar L.L.C. | Movable arm locator for stereotactic surgery |
US6282437B1 (en) | 1998-08-12 | 2001-08-28 | Neutar, Llc | Body-mounted sensing system for stereotactic surgery |
US6477400B1 (en) | 1998-08-20 | 2002-11-05 | Sofamor Danek Holdings, Inc. | Fluoroscopic image guided orthopaedic surgery system with intraoperative registration |
US6033415A (en) | 1998-09-14 | 2000-03-07 | Integrated Surgical Systems | System and method for performing image directed robotic orthopaedic procedures without a fiducial reference system |
US6195577B1 (en) | 1998-10-08 | 2001-02-27 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Method and apparatus for positioning a device in a body |
DE19848765C2 (en) | 1998-10-22 | 2000-12-21 | Brainlab Med Computersyst Gmbh | Position verification in camera images |
US6633686B1 (en) | 1998-11-05 | 2003-10-14 | Washington University | Method and apparatus for image registration using large deformation diffeomorphisms on a sphere |
US6852107B2 (en) * | 2002-01-16 | 2005-02-08 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Minimally invasive surgical training using robotics and tele-collaboration |
US6468265B1 (en) | 1998-11-20 | 2002-10-22 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Performing cardiac surgery without cardioplegia |
US6659939B2 (en) | 1998-11-20 | 2003-12-09 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Cooperative minimally invasive telesurgical system |
US6398726B1 (en) | 1998-11-20 | 2002-06-04 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Stabilizer for robotic beating-heart surgery |
US6951535B2 (en) | 2002-01-16 | 2005-10-04 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Tele-medicine system that transmits an entire state of a subsystem |
US8527094B2 (en) | 1998-11-20 | 2013-09-03 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Multi-user medical robotic system for collaboration or training in minimally invasive surgical procedures |
US8177762B2 (en) * | 1998-12-07 | 2012-05-15 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Septum including at least one identifiable feature, access ports including same, and related methods |
US6430434B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2002-08-06 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | Method for determining the location and orientation of a bone for computer-assisted orthopedic procedures using intraoperatively attached markers |
US6322567B1 (en) | 1998-12-14 | 2001-11-27 | Integrated Surgical Systems, Inc. | Bone motion tracking system |
JP4612194B2 (en) | 1998-12-23 | 2011-01-12 | イメージ・ガイディッド・テクノロジーズ・インコーポレイテッド | Hybrid 3D probe tracked by multiple sensors |
US6345113B1 (en) * | 1999-01-12 | 2002-02-05 | Analogic Corporation | Apparatus and method for processing object data in computed tomography data using object projections |
US6560354B1 (en) | 1999-02-16 | 2003-05-06 | University Of Rochester | Apparatus and method for registration of images to physical space using a weighted combination of points and surfaces |
US6368331B1 (en) * | 1999-02-22 | 2002-04-09 | Vtarget Ltd. | Method and system for guiding a diagnostic or therapeutic instrument towards a target region inside the patient's body |
US6501981B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2002-12-31 | Accuray, Inc. | Apparatus and method for compensating for respiratory and patient motions during treatment |
US6778850B1 (en) * | 1999-03-16 | 2004-08-17 | Accuray, Inc. | Frameless radiosurgery treatment system and method |
DE69931074T2 (en) | 1999-03-17 | 2006-11-16 | Synthes Ag Chur | DEVICE FOR PRESENTING AND PLANNING CRANE COATING OPERATIONS |
US6470207B1 (en) * | 1999-03-23 | 2002-10-22 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Navigational guidance via computer-assisted fluoroscopic imaging |
AU766981B2 (en) | 1999-04-20 | 2003-10-30 | Ao Technology Ag | Device for the percutaneous obtainment of 3D-coordinates on the surface of a human or animal organ |
DE19917867B4 (en) | 1999-04-20 | 2005-04-21 | Brainlab Ag | Method and device for image support in the treatment of treatment objectives with integration of X-ray detection and navigation system |
US6491699B1 (en) * | 1999-04-20 | 2002-12-10 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Instrument guidance method and system for image guided surgery |
ATE242865T1 (en) * | 1999-05-03 | 2003-06-15 | Synthes Ag | POSITION DETECTION DEVICE WITH AIDS FOR DETERMINING THE DIRECTION OF THE GRAVITY VECTOR |
AU7628700A (en) * | 1999-08-04 | 2001-03-05 | Cbyon, Inc. | Biodegradable spinal fiducial implant and method |
US7217240B2 (en) * | 1999-10-01 | 2007-05-15 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Heart stabilizer |
US6747539B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2004-06-08 | Michael A. Martinelli | Patient-shielding and coil system |
US6493573B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2002-12-10 | Winchester Development Associates | Method and system for navigating a catheter probe in the presence of field-influencing objects |
US6379302B1 (en) * | 1999-10-28 | 2002-04-30 | Surgical Navigation Technologies Inc. | Navigation information overlay onto ultrasound imagery |
US6474341B1 (en) * | 1999-10-28 | 2002-11-05 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Surgical communication and power system |
US11331150B2 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2022-05-17 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for surgical navigation |
US7366562B2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2008-04-29 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for surgical navigation |
US6381485B1 (en) * | 1999-10-28 | 2002-04-30 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Registration of human anatomy integrated for electromagnetic localization |
WO2001031466A1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2001-05-03 | Winchester Development Associates | Coil structures and methods for generating magnetic fields |
US6235038B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2001-05-22 | Medtronic Surgical Navigation Technologies | System for translation of electromagnetic and optical localization systems |
US8239001B2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2012-08-07 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for surgical navigation |
US6499488B1 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2002-12-31 | Winchester Development Associates | Surgical sensor |
US8644907B2 (en) | 1999-10-28 | 2014-02-04 | Medtronic Navigaton, Inc. | Method and apparatus for surgical navigation |
DE19958407A1 (en) * | 1999-12-02 | 2001-06-07 | Philips Corp Intellectual Pty | Arrangement to display layered images during treatment of patient; has measurement devices to determine position of medical instrument, which has adjustment devices projecting from patient |
US20010034530A1 (en) | 2000-01-27 | 2001-10-25 | Malackowski Donald W. | Surgery system |
US7092748B2 (en) * | 2000-02-18 | 2006-08-15 | Centro Nacional De Investigaciones Cientificas (Cnic) | System and method for the tomography of the primary electric current of the brain and of the heart |
US6725080B2 (en) | 2000-03-01 | 2004-04-20 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Multiple cannula image guided tool for image guided procedures |
US6497134B1 (en) | 2000-03-15 | 2002-12-24 | Image Guided Technologies, Inc. | Calibration of an instrument |
US7137711B1 (en) | 2000-03-21 | 2006-11-21 | Leonard Reiffel | Multi-user retro reflector data input |
US7366561B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2008-04-29 | Medtronic, Inc. | Robotic trajectory guide |
US6535756B1 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2003-03-18 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Trajectory storage apparatus and method for surgical navigation system |
US7660621B2 (en) * | 2000-04-07 | 2010-02-09 | Medtronic, Inc. | Medical device introducer |
CN1190752C (en) * | 2000-05-03 | 2005-02-23 | 伦纳德·赖费尔 | Dual mode data imaging product |
US7085400B1 (en) | 2000-06-14 | 2006-08-01 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | System and method for image based sensor calibration |
US6466813B1 (en) * | 2000-07-22 | 2002-10-15 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for MR-based volumetric frameless 3-D interactive localization, virtual simulation, and dosimetric radiation therapy planning |
US6726699B1 (en) | 2000-08-15 | 2004-04-27 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Instrument guide |
US6902569B2 (en) | 2000-08-17 | 2005-06-07 | Image-Guided Neurologics, Inc. | Trajectory guide with instrument immobilizer |
DE60134759D1 (en) * | 2000-08-18 | 2008-08-21 | Leonard Reiffel | NOTE PICTURE DATA PRODUCT |
US7034803B1 (en) | 2000-08-18 | 2006-04-25 | Leonard Reiffel | Cursor display privacy product |
US7225012B1 (en) | 2000-09-18 | 2007-05-29 | The Johns Hopkins University | Methods and systems for image-guided surgical interventions |
AU2001294718A1 (en) * | 2000-09-25 | 2002-05-06 | Z-Kat, Inc | Fluoroscopic registration artifact with optical and/or magnetic markers |
US7024248B2 (en) | 2000-10-16 | 2006-04-04 | Remon Medical Technologies Ltd | Systems and methods for communicating with implantable devices |
EP1339351A2 (en) * | 2000-11-14 | 2003-09-03 | APPLE, Marc G. . | Directional energy emitting implant |
EP2130511A1 (en) * | 2000-11-17 | 2009-12-09 | Calypso Medical, Inc | System for locating and defining a target location within a human body |
WO2002043569A2 (en) | 2000-11-28 | 2002-06-06 | Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | Endoscopic beating-heart stabilizer and vessel occlusion fastener |
JP4081373B2 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2008-04-23 | ライフェル レナード | Coded data source converter by image |
WO2002049340A1 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2002-06-20 | Leonard Reiffel | Multi-imager multi-source multi-use coded data source data input product |
EP1350385A4 (en) * | 2000-12-15 | 2004-12-15 | Leonard Reiffel | Imaged coded data source tracking product |
BR0116707A (en) * | 2001-01-03 | 2005-08-16 | Ultrashape Inc | Non-evasive ultrasonic body contour |
US7347855B2 (en) * | 2001-10-29 | 2008-03-25 | Ultrashape Ltd. | Non-invasive ultrasonic body contouring |
US20050113846A1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2005-05-26 | Carson Christopher P. | Surgical navigation systems and processes for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty |
EP1372516B1 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2009-05-13 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical navigation systems for unicompartmental knee |
US7547307B2 (en) * | 2001-02-27 | 2009-06-16 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Computer assisted knee arthroplasty instrumentation, systems, and processes |
WO2002086807A1 (en) * | 2001-04-19 | 2002-10-31 | Leonard Reiffel | Combined imaging coded data source data acquisition |
US20020165524A1 (en) | 2001-05-01 | 2002-11-07 | Dan Sanchez | Pivot point arm for a robotic system used to perform a surgical procedure |
JP2004524942A (en) * | 2001-05-16 | 2004-08-19 | コーニンクレッカ フィリップス エレクトロニクス エヌ ヴィ | Automatic indication of tomographic imaging parameters |
US6636757B1 (en) * | 2001-06-04 | 2003-10-21 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for electromagnetic navigation of a surgical probe near a metal object |
US20020193685A1 (en) * | 2001-06-08 | 2002-12-19 | Calypso Medical, Inc. | Guided Radiation Therapy System |
DE10136160A1 (en) * | 2001-07-25 | 2003-02-13 | Philips Corp Intellectual Pty | Method and device for registering two 3D image data sets |
US20040135766A1 (en) * | 2001-08-15 | 2004-07-15 | Leonard Reiffel | Imaged toggled data input product |
US6728599B2 (en) | 2001-09-07 | 2004-04-27 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Modularity system for computer assisted surgery |
US7135978B2 (en) * | 2001-09-14 | 2006-11-14 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | Miniature resonating marker assembly |
DE10145587B4 (en) | 2001-09-15 | 2007-04-12 | Aesculap Ag & Co. Kg | Method and device for testing a marking element for displacement |
US7383073B1 (en) | 2001-10-16 | 2008-06-03 | Z-Kat Inc. | Digital minimally invasive surgery system |
CN1612713A (en) | 2001-11-05 | 2005-05-04 | 计算机化医学体系股份有限公司 | Apparatus and method for registration, guidance, and targeting of external beam radiation therapy |
US6839612B2 (en) | 2001-12-07 | 2005-01-04 | Institute Surgical, Inc. | Microwrist system for surgical procedures |
US6793653B2 (en) | 2001-12-08 | 2004-09-21 | Computer Motion, Inc. | Multifunctional handle for a medical robotic system |
US6822570B2 (en) * | 2001-12-20 | 2004-11-23 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | System for spatially adjustable excitation of leadless miniature marker |
US6812842B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2004-11-02 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | System for excitation of a leadless miniature marker |
US6838990B2 (en) | 2001-12-20 | 2005-01-04 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | System for excitation leadless miniature marker |
WO2003063700A1 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2003-08-07 | Sicel Technologies, Inc. | Implantable sensor housing and fabrication methods |
CA2475979A1 (en) * | 2002-02-11 | 2003-08-21 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Image-guided fracture reduction |
WO2003069333A1 (en) | 2002-02-14 | 2003-08-21 | Illumina, Inc. | Automated information processing in randomly ordered arrays |
US6947786B2 (en) * | 2002-02-28 | 2005-09-20 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for perspective inversion |
DE10210650B4 (en) * | 2002-03-11 | 2005-04-28 | Siemens Ag | Method for the three-dimensional representation of a study area of a patient in the form of a 3D reconstruction image and medical examination and / or treatment facility |
CA2478914A1 (en) * | 2002-03-22 | 2003-09-09 | Stanley R. Conston | Ophthalmic microfiducial device and method for use |
US6942667B1 (en) | 2002-04-02 | 2005-09-13 | Vanderbilt University | Bone anchor |
US6990368B2 (en) * | 2002-04-04 | 2006-01-24 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for virtual digital subtraction angiography |
DE10215808B4 (en) * | 2002-04-10 | 2005-02-24 | Siemens Ag | Registration procedure for navigational procedures |
DE50201006D1 (en) * | 2002-04-16 | 2004-10-21 | Brainlab Ag | Marker for an instrument and method for locating a marker |
US7998062B2 (en) | 2004-03-29 | 2011-08-16 | Superdimension, Ltd. | Endoscope structures and techniques for navigating to a target in branched structure |
AR039475A1 (en) * | 2002-05-01 | 2005-02-23 | Wyeth Corp | 6-ALQUILIDEN-PENEMS TRICICLICOS AS BETA-LACTAMASA INHIBITORS |
MXPA04010287A (en) * | 2002-05-02 | 2005-06-08 | Gmp Surgical Solutions Inc | Apparatus for positioning a medical instrument. |
AU2002345319B2 (en) * | 2002-06-25 | 2008-03-06 | Ultrashape Ltd. | Devices and methodologies useful in body aesthetics |
US6978167B2 (en) * | 2002-07-01 | 2005-12-20 | Claron Technology Inc. | Video pose tracking system and method |
JP3698130B2 (en) * | 2002-07-22 | 2005-09-21 | 株式会社日立製作所 | CT apparatus, CT imaging method, and CT imaging service method |
US20040019265A1 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2004-01-29 | Mazzocchi Rudy A. | Fiducial marker devices, tools, and methods |
US20040030237A1 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2004-02-12 | Lee David M. | Fiducial marker devices and methods |
US7720522B2 (en) * | 2003-02-25 | 2010-05-18 | Medtronic, Inc. | Fiducial marker devices, tools, and methods |
US7787934B2 (en) * | 2002-07-29 | 2010-08-31 | Medtronic, Inc. | Fiducial marker devices, tools, and methods |
US7187800B2 (en) * | 2002-08-02 | 2007-03-06 | Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for image segmentation using Jensen-Shannon divergence and Jensen-Renyi divergence |
EP2070487B1 (en) * | 2002-08-13 | 2014-03-05 | NeuroArm Surgical, Ltd. | Microsurgical robot system |
US6892090B2 (en) * | 2002-08-19 | 2005-05-10 | Surgical Navigation Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for virtual endoscopy |
WO2004019799A2 (en) * | 2002-08-29 | 2004-03-11 | Computerized Medical Systems, Inc. | Methods and systems for localizing of a medical imaging probe and of a biopsy needle |
US7704260B2 (en) | 2002-09-17 | 2010-04-27 | Medtronic, Inc. | Low profile instrument immobilizer |
WO2004026103A2 (en) * | 2002-09-17 | 2004-04-01 | Visionmed, Llc | Unilateral fixator |
ES2204322B1 (en) * | 2002-10-01 | 2005-07-16 | Consejo Sup. De Invest. Cientificas | FUNCTIONAL BROWSER. |
US6856828B2 (en) * | 2002-10-04 | 2005-02-15 | Orthosoft Inc. | CAS bone reference and less invasive installation method thereof |
US20040068263A1 (en) * | 2002-10-04 | 2004-04-08 | Benoit Chouinard | CAS bone reference with articulated support |
JP4505333B2 (en) * | 2002-11-14 | 2010-07-21 | エクストラオルト インコーポレイテッド | How to use a fixator device |
US7599730B2 (en) * | 2002-11-19 | 2009-10-06 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Navigation system for cardiac therapies |
US7697972B2 (en) * | 2002-11-19 | 2010-04-13 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Navigation system for cardiac therapies |
US6977985B2 (en) * | 2002-12-17 | 2005-12-20 | Agilent Technologies, Inc. | X-ray laminography system having a pitch, roll and Z-motion positioning system |
WO2004055734A1 (en) * | 2002-12-18 | 2004-07-01 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | A method and apparatus for determining a pose of an implant |
US7636596B2 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2009-12-22 | Medtronic, Inc. | Organ access device and method |
US7289839B2 (en) * | 2002-12-30 | 2007-10-30 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | Implantable marker with a leadless signal transmitter compatible for use in magnetic resonance devices |
US7542791B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2009-06-02 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for preplanning a surgical procedure |
US7660623B2 (en) * | 2003-01-30 | 2010-02-09 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Six degree of freedom alignment display for medical procedures |
WO2004070655A2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-19 | Vanderbilt University | Apparatus and methods of determining marker orientation in fiducial registration |
WO2004069040A2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-19 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Method and apparatus for computer assistance with intramedullary nail procedure |
US20050267354A1 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2005-12-01 | Joel Marquart | System and method for providing computer assistance with spinal fixation procedures |
WO2004069036A2 (en) * | 2003-02-04 | 2004-08-19 | Z-Kat, Inc. | Computer-assisted knee replacement apparatus and method |
US7896889B2 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2011-03-01 | Medtronic, Inc. | Trajectory guide with angled or patterned lumens or height adjustment |
US7559935B2 (en) * | 2003-02-20 | 2009-07-14 | Medtronic, Inc. | Target depth locators for trajectory guide for introducing an instrument |
JP4563377B2 (en) * | 2003-02-25 | 2010-10-13 | イメージ・ガイディッド・ニューロロジクス・インコーポレーテッド | Fiducial marker device, tool and method |
US20070161884A1 (en) * | 2003-04-02 | 2007-07-12 | Sicel Technologies, Inc. | Methods, systems, and computer program products for providing dynamic data of positional localization of target implants |
DE10316558B4 (en) * | 2003-04-10 | 2005-03-31 | Siemens Ag | Method for detecting changes in position of an implant and X-ray system for carrying out the method |
US7570791B2 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2009-08-04 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing 2D to 3D registration |
US20060281991A1 (en) * | 2003-05-09 | 2006-12-14 | Fitzpatrick J M | Fiducial marker holder system for surgery |
US20060291797A1 (en) * | 2003-05-27 | 2006-12-28 | Leonard Reiffel | Multi-imager multi-source multi-use coded data source data input product |
US20050033157A1 (en) | 2003-07-25 | 2005-02-10 | Klein Dean A. | Multi-modality marking material and method |
AU2004266654B2 (en) | 2003-08-12 | 2011-07-21 | Loma Linda University Medical Center | Modular patient support system |
KR101249815B1 (en) * | 2003-08-12 | 2013-04-03 | 로마 린다 유니버시티 메디칼 센터 | Patient positioning system for radiation therapy system |
US7662157B2 (en) * | 2003-08-21 | 2010-02-16 | Osteomed L.P. | Bone anchor system |
US7313430B2 (en) * | 2003-08-28 | 2007-12-25 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for performing stereotactic surgery |
JP4711612B2 (en) * | 2003-09-11 | 2011-06-29 | 株式会社日立メディコ | Stereotaxic surgery support system |
ATE438335T1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2009-08-15 | Super Dimension Ltd | SYSTEM OF ACCESSORIES FOR USE WITH BRONCHOSCOPES |
EP2316328B1 (en) | 2003-09-15 | 2012-05-09 | Super Dimension Ltd. | Wrap-around holding device for use with bronchoscopes |
US20050059879A1 (en) * | 2003-09-16 | 2005-03-17 | Robert Sutherland | Localization of a sensor device in a body |
US7862570B2 (en) | 2003-10-03 | 2011-01-04 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical positioners |
US20050080332A1 (en) * | 2003-10-10 | 2005-04-14 | Shiu Almon S. | Near simultaneous computed tomography image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy |
US7835778B2 (en) | 2003-10-16 | 2010-11-16 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for surgical navigation of a multiple piece construct for implantation |
US7840253B2 (en) * | 2003-10-17 | 2010-11-23 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for surgical navigation |
US7764985B2 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2010-07-27 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Surgical navigation system component fault interfaces and related processes |
US20050085822A1 (en) * | 2003-10-20 | 2005-04-21 | Thornberry Robert C. | Surgical navigation system component fault interfaces and related processes |
DE602004031147D1 (en) * | 2003-11-14 | 2011-03-03 | Smith & Nephew Inc | |
WO2005053559A1 (en) * | 2003-11-25 | 2005-06-16 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for providing a navigational array |
US20050113659A1 (en) * | 2003-11-26 | 2005-05-26 | Albert Pothier | Device for data input for surgical navigation system |
US8196589B2 (en) * | 2003-12-24 | 2012-06-12 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | Implantable marker with wireless signal transmitter |
JP2007523696A (en) * | 2004-01-16 | 2007-08-23 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | Computer-aided ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty |
US20050159759A1 (en) * | 2004-01-20 | 2005-07-21 | Mark Harbaugh | Systems and methods for performing minimally invasive incisions |
US20050197569A1 (en) * | 2004-01-22 | 2005-09-08 | Mccombs Daniel | Methods, systems, and apparatuses for providing patient-mounted surgical navigational sensors |
US20050267353A1 (en) * | 2004-02-04 | 2005-12-01 | Joel Marquart | Computer-assisted knee replacement apparatus and method |
US8764725B2 (en) * | 2004-02-09 | 2014-07-01 | Covidien Lp | Directional anchoring mechanism, method and applications thereof |
US20050182421A1 (en) * | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-18 | Schulte Gregory T. | Methods and apparatus for securing a therapy delivery device within a burr hole |
US20070073306A1 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2007-03-29 | Ryan Lakin | Cutting block for surgical navigation |
US7641660B2 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2010-01-05 | Biomet Manufacturing Corporation | Method, apparatus, and system for image guided bone cutting |
US20050234465A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-20 | Mccombs Daniel L | Guided saw with pins |
WO2005096982A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-20 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Methods and apparatuses for providing a reference array input device |
US20050234466A1 (en) * | 2004-03-31 | 2005-10-20 | Jody Stallings | TLS adjustable block |
US20050228404A1 (en) * | 2004-04-12 | 2005-10-13 | Dirk Vandevelde | Surgical navigation system component automated imaging navigation and related processes |
JP4808704B2 (en) * | 2004-04-15 | 2011-11-02 | スミス アンド ネフュー インコーポレーテッド | Detachable and repositionable reference frame for computer-assisted surgery |
US8109942B2 (en) * | 2004-04-21 | 2012-02-07 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Computer-aided methods, systems, and apparatuses for shoulder arthroplasty |
US7567834B2 (en) * | 2004-05-03 | 2009-07-28 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for implantation between two vertebral bodies |
ITTO20040292A1 (en) * | 2004-05-06 | 2004-08-06 | Ezio Visentin | CONNECTION BODY INTENDED TO BE INTRODUCED WITHIN A BONE STRUCTURE OF A HUMAN OR ANIMAL BODY AND SYSTEM FOR THE DETECTION OF AT LEAST A REFERENCE POINT PROVIDED IN THE CONNECTION BODY ITSELF. |
US20050279368A1 (en) * | 2004-06-16 | 2005-12-22 | Mccombs Daniel L | Computer assisted surgery input/output systems and processes |
EP1768747B1 (en) | 2004-06-24 | 2013-08-07 | Calypso Medical Technologies, INC. | Systems for treating a lung of a patient using guided radiation therapy or surgery |
US7290572B2 (en) * | 2005-07-10 | 2007-11-06 | David James Silva | Method for purging a high purity manifold |
JP2008507367A (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2008-03-13 | カリプソー メディカル テクノロジーズ インコーポレイテッド | Integrated radiation therapy system and method for treating a target in a patient |
US8437449B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2013-05-07 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Dynamic/adaptive treatment planning for radiation therapy |
WO2006023055A2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2006-03-02 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | Systems and methods for real time tracking of targets in radiation therapy and other medical applications |
US9586059B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2017-03-07 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | User interface for guided radiation therapy |
US8095203B2 (en) * | 2004-07-23 | 2012-01-10 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Data processing for real-time tracking of a target in radiation therapy |
US7899513B2 (en) | 2004-07-23 | 2011-03-01 | Calypso Medical Technologies, Inc. | Modular software system for guided radiation therapy |
US8290570B2 (en) * | 2004-09-10 | 2012-10-16 | Stryker Leibinger Gmbh & Co., Kg | System for ad hoc tracking of an object |
US20060064142A1 (en) | 2004-09-17 | 2006-03-23 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Systems and methods for deriving relative physiologic measurements using an implanted sensor device |
US8007448B2 (en) * | 2004-10-08 | 2011-08-30 | Stryker Leibinger Gmbh & Co. Kg. | System and method for performing arthroplasty of a joint and tracking a plumb line plane |
US8280486B2 (en) | 2004-10-13 | 2012-10-02 | Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. | Site marker visable under multiple modalities |
US8060183B2 (en) | 2004-10-13 | 2011-11-15 | Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. | Site marker visible under multiple modalities |
US20060079805A1 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2006-04-13 | Miller Michael E | Site marker visable under multiple modalities |
US8442623B2 (en) * | 2004-10-13 | 2013-05-14 | Suros Surgical Systems, Inc. | Site marker visible under multiple modalities |
US7636595B2 (en) * | 2004-10-28 | 2009-12-22 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for calibrating non-linear instruments |
US7813808B1 (en) | 2004-11-24 | 2010-10-12 | Remon Medical Technologies Ltd | Implanted sensor system with optimized operational and sensing parameters |
AU2005311751A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-08 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems, methods, and apparatus for automatic software flow using instrument detection during computer-aided surgery |
AU2005311752A1 (en) * | 2004-12-02 | 2006-06-08 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems for providing a reference plane for mounting an acetabular cup |
US7497863B2 (en) | 2004-12-04 | 2009-03-03 | Medtronic, Inc. | Instrument guiding stage apparatus and method for using same |
US7744606B2 (en) * | 2004-12-04 | 2010-06-29 | Medtronic, Inc. | Multi-lumen instrument guide |
US20060161051A1 (en) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-07-20 | Lauralan Terrill-Grisoni | Method of computer-assisted ligament balancing and component placement in total knee arthroplasty |
JP2008529580A (en) * | 2005-02-06 | 2008-08-07 | ウルトラシェイプ エルティーディー. | Non-thermal sonic texture modification |
CA2601976A1 (en) | 2005-02-22 | 2006-08-31 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | In-line milling system |
EP1858565B1 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2021-08-11 | C.R. Bard, Inc. | Access port identification systems and methods |
US7947022B2 (en) | 2005-03-04 | 2011-05-24 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Access port identification systems and methods |
US9474888B2 (en) | 2005-03-04 | 2016-10-25 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Implantable access port including a sandwiched radiopaque insert |
US8029482B2 (en) | 2005-03-04 | 2011-10-04 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Systems and methods for radiographically identifying an access port |
EP1874393B1 (en) | 2005-04-27 | 2017-09-06 | C.R.Bard, Inc. | Infusion apparatuses |
JP5149158B2 (en) | 2005-04-27 | 2013-02-20 | シー・アール・バード・インコーポレーテッド | Injection device and method related thereto |
US10307581B2 (en) | 2005-04-27 | 2019-06-04 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Reinforced septum for an implantable medical device |
US20070016008A1 (en) * | 2005-06-23 | 2007-01-18 | Ryan Schoenefeld | Selective gesturing input to a surgical navigation system |
US7840256B2 (en) | 2005-06-27 | 2010-11-23 | Biomet Manufacturing Corporation | Image guided tracking array and method |
US20080219405A1 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2008-09-11 | Tony Falco | System and method for patient setup for radiotherapy treatment |
US7742815B2 (en) * | 2005-09-09 | 2010-06-22 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Using implanted sensors for feedback control of implanted medical devices |
US20070073133A1 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2007-03-29 | Schoenefeld Ryan J | Virtual mouse for use in surgical navigation |
US7643862B2 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2010-01-05 | Biomet Manufacturing Corporation | Virtual mouse for use in surgical navigation |
US9283053B2 (en) | 2005-09-19 | 2016-03-15 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and methods for implanting objects, such as bronchoscopically implanting markers in the lung of patients |
US7835784B2 (en) | 2005-09-21 | 2010-11-16 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for positioning a reference frame |
US20070093709A1 (en) * | 2005-10-26 | 2007-04-26 | Abernathie Dennis L | Surgical navigation markers |
US7713471B2 (en) * | 2005-10-31 | 2010-05-11 | Codman Neuro Sciences Sarl | System for protecting circuitry in high-temperature environments |
US20070118055A1 (en) * | 2005-11-04 | 2007-05-24 | Smith & Nephew, Inc. | Systems and methods for facilitating surgical procedures involving custom medical implants |
US20090216113A1 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2009-08-27 | Eric Meier | Apparatus and Methods for Using an Electromagnetic Transponder in Orthopedic Procedures |
US7702378B2 (en) * | 2005-11-17 | 2010-04-20 | Breast-Med, Inc. | Tissue marker for multimodality radiographic imaging |
US11241296B2 (en) | 2005-11-17 | 2022-02-08 | Breast-Med, Inc. | Imaging fiducial markers and methods |
US9168102B2 (en) * | 2006-01-18 | 2015-10-27 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for providing a container to a sterile environment |
US8170647B2 (en) * | 2006-01-20 | 2012-05-01 | Best Medical International, Inc | Fiduciary markers and method of use thereof |
US20070237307A1 (en) * | 2006-03-03 | 2007-10-11 | Loubert Suddaby | Radiographic spine marker |
EP1992288A4 (en) * | 2006-03-09 | 2010-01-20 | Imagnosis Inc | Medical image processing method |
US8165659B2 (en) | 2006-03-22 | 2012-04-24 | Garrett Sheffer | Modeling method and apparatus for use in surgical navigation |
US7587022B1 (en) * | 2006-03-23 | 2009-09-08 | General Electric Company | Correlation-based motion estimation of object to be imaged |
WO2007124338A1 (en) * | 2006-04-19 | 2007-11-01 | Xoran Technologies, Inc. | Ct scanner with untracked markers |
US8112292B2 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2012-02-07 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing a therapy |
US20140025056A1 (en) * | 2006-05-24 | 2014-01-23 | Kambiz Dowlatshahi | Image-guided removal and thermal therapy of breast cancer |
US8280483B2 (en) * | 2006-06-14 | 2012-10-02 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Multi-modality medical image viewing |
CN100502776C (en) * | 2006-07-10 | 2009-06-24 | 西门子(中国)有限公司 | Device and method for switching coordinate system between magnetic resonance system and equipment guided by the same |
US7955268B2 (en) * | 2006-07-21 | 2011-06-07 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Multiple sensor deployment |
US20080033286A1 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2008-02-07 | Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. | Fiducial marker for imaging localization and method of using the same |
US9451928B2 (en) * | 2006-09-13 | 2016-09-27 | Elekta Ltd. | Incorporating internal anatomy in clinical radiotherapy setups |
US20080077440A1 (en) * | 2006-09-26 | 2008-03-27 | Remon Medical Technologies, Ltd | Drug dispenser responsive to physiological parameters |
US8660635B2 (en) * | 2006-09-29 | 2014-02-25 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for optimizing a computer assisted surgical procedure |
WO2008048361A1 (en) * | 2006-10-18 | 2008-04-24 | Medical Components, Inc. | Venous access port assembly with radiopaque indicia |
GB2445961B (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2009-02-04 | Prosurgics Ltd | Fiducial marker placement |
US9265912B2 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2016-02-23 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Indicia informative of characteristics of insertable medical devices |
US9642986B2 (en) | 2006-11-08 | 2017-05-09 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Resource information key for an insertable medical device |
EP2095374A4 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2012-05-30 | Univ Loma Linda Med | Device and method for immobilizing patients for breast radiation therapy |
CN100428917C (en) * | 2006-12-21 | 2008-10-29 | 南通大学 | Intramedullary lock pin machining system |
IL188262A (en) * | 2007-01-10 | 2011-10-31 | Mediguide Ltd | System and method for superimposing a representation of the tip of a catheter on an image acquired by a moving imager |
WO2008097902A2 (en) * | 2007-02-05 | 2008-08-14 | Novian Health, Inc. | Interstitial laser therapy kits and interstitial laser therapy control system |
US8092507B2 (en) * | 2007-02-05 | 2012-01-10 | Novian Health, Inc. | Interstitial energy treatment probe holders |
US20080234572A1 (en) * | 2007-03-23 | 2008-09-25 | Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. | Fiducial marker with absorbable connecting sleeve and absorbable spacer for imaging localization |
US8934961B2 (en) | 2007-05-18 | 2015-01-13 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Trackable diagnostic scope apparatus and methods of use |
AU2008262127A1 (en) * | 2007-06-14 | 2008-12-18 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Intracorporeal pressure measurement devices and methods |
US20080319491A1 (en) | 2007-06-19 | 2008-12-25 | Ryan Schoenefeld | Patient-matched surgical component and methods of use |
EP3269417A1 (en) | 2007-06-20 | 2018-01-17 | Medical Components, Inc. | Implantable access port with molded and/or radiopaque indicia |
WO2009012395A1 (en) | 2007-07-19 | 2009-01-22 | Innovative Medical Devices, Llc | Venous access port assembly with x-ray discernable indicia |
CA2693972C (en) | 2007-07-19 | 2019-01-15 | Medical Components, Inc. | Venous access port assembly with x-ray discernable indicia |
US8249317B2 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2012-08-21 | Eleckta Ltd. | Methods and systems for compensating for changes in anatomy of radiotherapy patients |
WO2009012576A1 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2009-01-29 | Resonant Medical Inc. | Methods and systems for guiding the acquisition of ultrasound images |
JP2009056299A (en) | 2007-08-07 | 2009-03-19 | Stryker Leibinger Gmbh & Co Kg | Method of and system for planning surgery |
US8135198B2 (en) * | 2007-08-08 | 2012-03-13 | Resonant Medical, Inc. | Systems and methods for constructing images |
US8905920B2 (en) | 2007-09-27 | 2014-12-09 | Covidien Lp | Bronchoscope adapter and method |
US20090105584A1 (en) * | 2007-10-18 | 2009-04-23 | Civco Medical Instruments Co., Inc. | Fiducial marker deployment system using single stick neeedle and method of use |
US9579496B2 (en) | 2007-11-07 | 2017-02-28 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Radiopaque and septum-based indicators for a multi-lumen implantable port |
JP5250251B2 (en) * | 2007-12-17 | 2013-07-31 | イマグノーシス株式会社 | Medical imaging marker and its utilization program |
US8571637B2 (en) * | 2008-01-21 | 2013-10-29 | Biomet Manufacturing, Llc | Patella tracking method and apparatus for use in surgical navigation |
US8725260B2 (en) * | 2008-02-11 | 2014-05-13 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc | Methods of monitoring hemodynamic status for rhythm discrimination within the heart |
US8369960B2 (en) * | 2008-02-12 | 2013-02-05 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Systems and methods for controlling wireless signal transfers between ultrasound-enabled medical devices |
JP5468021B2 (en) | 2008-02-22 | 2014-04-09 | ローマ リンダ ユニヴァーシティ メディカル センター | System and method for characterizing spatial distortions in 3D imaging systems |
JP4542591B2 (en) * | 2008-03-05 | 2010-09-15 | 富士フイルム株式会社 | Image processing system, image storage device, image processing device, image processing method, and program |
US9575140B2 (en) * | 2008-04-03 | 2017-02-21 | Covidien Lp | Magnetic interference detection system and method |
US8352015B2 (en) * | 2008-05-27 | 2013-01-08 | Kyma Medical Technologies, Ltd. | Location tracking of a metallic object in a living body using a radar detector and guiding an ultrasound probe to direct ultrasound waves at the location |
US8989837B2 (en) | 2009-12-01 | 2015-03-24 | Kyma Medical Technologies Ltd. | Methods and systems for determining fluid content of tissue |
US8189738B2 (en) * | 2008-06-02 | 2012-05-29 | Elekta Ltd. | Methods and systems for guiding clinical radiotherapy setups |
US8473032B2 (en) * | 2008-06-03 | 2013-06-25 | Superdimension, Ltd. | Feature-based registration method |
EP2293720B1 (en) | 2008-06-05 | 2021-02-24 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Motion compensation for medical imaging and associated systems and methods |
US8218847B2 (en) | 2008-06-06 | 2012-07-10 | Superdimension, Ltd. | Hybrid registration method |
US8932207B2 (en) | 2008-07-10 | 2015-01-13 | Covidien Lp | Integrated multi-functional endoscopic tool |
US8489177B2 (en) * | 2008-07-16 | 2013-07-16 | Dilon Technologies, Inc. | Fiducial marker and method for gamma guided stereotactic localization |
CN101661212B (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2011-06-08 | 鸿富锦精密工业(深圳)有限公司 | Projector configuration |
US8165658B2 (en) | 2008-09-26 | 2012-04-24 | Medtronic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for positioning a guide relative to a base |
EP2334230A1 (en) * | 2008-10-10 | 2011-06-22 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Systems and methods for determining cardiac output using pulmonary artery pressure measurements |
BRPI0919890B8 (en) * | 2008-10-31 | 2019-09-24 | Bard Inc C R | access port to provide subcutaneous access to a patient, and force injectable access port |
US8932271B2 (en) | 2008-11-13 | 2015-01-13 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Implantable medical devices including septum-based indicators |
US11890443B2 (en) | 2008-11-13 | 2024-02-06 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Implantable medical devices including septum-based indicators |
WO2010059291A1 (en) * | 2008-11-19 | 2010-05-27 | Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. | Assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance via pulmonary artery pressure |
US8175681B2 (en) | 2008-12-16 | 2012-05-08 | Medtronic Navigation Inc. | Combination of electromagnetic and electropotential localization |
US9943704B1 (en) | 2009-01-21 | 2018-04-17 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Method and system for fiducials contained in removable device for radiation therapy |
US8611984B2 (en) * | 2009-04-08 | 2013-12-17 | Covidien Lp | Locatable catheter |
US20100324378A1 (en) * | 2009-06-17 | 2010-12-23 | Tran Binh C | Physiologic signal monitoring using ultrasound signals from implanted devices |
WO2011005847A1 (en) | 2009-07-07 | 2011-01-13 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Extensible internal bolster for a medical device |
US10542962B2 (en) * | 2009-07-10 | 2020-01-28 | Elekta, LTD | Adaptive radiotherapy treatment using ultrasound |
US8494613B2 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2013-07-23 | Medtronic, Inc. | Combination localization system |
US8494614B2 (en) * | 2009-08-31 | 2013-07-23 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Combination localization system |
US8405396B2 (en) | 2009-09-30 | 2013-03-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Implantable or insertable nuclear magnetic resonant imaging system |
JP6034695B2 (en) | 2009-10-01 | 2016-11-30 | ローマ リンダ ユニヴァーシティ メディカル センター | Ion-induced impact ionization detector and its use |
US8758263B1 (en) | 2009-10-31 | 2014-06-24 | Voxel Rad, Ltd. | Systems and methods for frameless image-guided biopsy and therapeutic intervention |
JP2013510652A (en) | 2009-11-17 | 2013-03-28 | シー・アール・バード・インコーポレーテッド | Overmolded access port including locking feature and identification feature |
US8864768B2 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2014-10-21 | Zimmer Knee Creations, Inc. | Coordinate mapping system for joint treatment |
US8801800B2 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2014-08-12 | Zimmer Knee Creations, Inc. | Bone-derived implantable devices and tool for subchondral treatment of joint pain |
WO2011063240A1 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2011-05-26 | Knee Creations, Llc | Implantable devices for subchondral treatment of joint pain |
WO2011063281A1 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2011-05-26 | Knee Creations, Llc | Navigation and positioning instruments for joint repair |
WO2011063267A1 (en) * | 2009-11-20 | 2011-05-26 | Knee Creations, Llc | Instruments for a variable angle approach to a joint |
US8951261B2 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2015-02-10 | Zimmer Knee Creations, Inc. | Subchondral treatment of joint pain |
US8821504B2 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2014-09-02 | Zimmer Knee Creations, Inc. | Method for treating joint pain and associated instruments |
US9259257B2 (en) | 2009-11-20 | 2016-02-16 | Zimmer Knee Creations, Inc. | Instruments for targeting a joint defect |
JP5624328B2 (en) * | 2010-01-04 | 2014-11-12 | 株式会社東芝 | Medical image diagnostic apparatus and image processing apparatus |
US9248316B2 (en) | 2010-01-12 | 2016-02-02 | Elekta Ltd. | Feature tracking using ultrasound |
US20110172526A1 (en) * | 2010-01-12 | 2011-07-14 | Martin Lachaine | Feature Tracking Using Ultrasound |
US10582834B2 (en) | 2010-06-15 | 2020-03-10 | Covidien Lp | Locatable expandable working channel and method |
JP6081355B2 (en) | 2010-07-21 | 2017-02-15 | キマ メディカル テクノロジーズ リミテッド | Embedded radio frequency sensor |
JP5624402B2 (en) * | 2010-08-23 | 2014-11-12 | 株式会社東芝 | Magnetic resonance imaging system |
EP2621578B1 (en) | 2010-10-01 | 2023-11-29 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Delivery catheter for delivering an implant, for example, bronchoscopically implanting a marker in a lung |
USD676955S1 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2013-02-26 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Implantable access port |
USD682416S1 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2013-05-14 | C. R. Bard, Inc. | Implantable access port |
CA2831840C (en) | 2011-02-22 | 2017-08-22 | Knee Creations, Llc | Navigation and positioning systems and guide instruments for joint repair |
US10426554B2 (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2019-10-01 | The Johns Hopkins University | System and method for tracking and navigation |
US9805624B2 (en) | 2011-09-30 | 2017-10-31 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Simulated, representative high-fidelity organosilicate tissue models |
US20150025548A1 (en) | 2012-03-08 | 2015-01-22 | Neutar, Llc | Patient and Procedure Customized Fixation and Targeting Devices for Stereotactic Frames |
WO2013165529A2 (en) * | 2012-05-03 | 2013-11-07 | Poniatowski Lauren H | Systems and methods for analyzing surgical techniques |
DE102012209059B4 (en) | 2012-05-30 | 2024-05-02 | Siemens Healthineers Ag | Method and device for determining a temporal change of a biomarker in a study area |
CN103829965B (en) | 2012-11-27 | 2019-03-22 | Ge医疗系统环球技术有限公司 | The method and apparatus of CT scan is guided using marked body |
US10292887B2 (en) | 2012-12-31 | 2019-05-21 | Mako Surgical Corp. | Motorized joint positioner |
EP2969410B1 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2020-07-29 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring a surgical procedure with critical regions |
US9545288B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2017-01-17 | Think Surgical, Inc. | Systems and devices for a counter balanced surgical robot |
GB2512384B (en) * | 2013-03-28 | 2016-07-20 | Elekta Ab | Markers, Phantoms and Associated Methods for Calibrating Imaging Systems |
USD733873S1 (en) | 2013-05-07 | 2015-07-07 | Novian Health Inc. | Probe holder |
JP6309096B2 (en) | 2013-10-29 | 2018-04-11 | キマ メディカル テクノロジーズ リミテッド | Antenna system and device, and manufacturing method thereof |
EP4233711A3 (en) | 2014-02-05 | 2023-10-18 | Zoll Medical Israel Ltd. | Apparatuses for determining blood pressure |
US9919165B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2018-03-20 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for fiducial to plan association |
US10043284B2 (en) | 2014-05-07 | 2018-08-07 | Varian Medical Systems, Inc. | Systems and methods for real-time tumor tracking |
US10952593B2 (en) | 2014-06-10 | 2021-03-23 | Covidien Lp | Bronchoscope adapter |
US10471278B2 (en) * | 2014-06-26 | 2019-11-12 | University Of Florida Research Foundation, Incorporated | Cranial alignment device for use in intracranial stereotactic surgery |
US9795455B2 (en) | 2014-08-22 | 2017-10-24 | Breast-Med, Inc. | Tissue marker for multimodality radiographic imaging |
US11259715B2 (en) | 2014-09-08 | 2022-03-01 | Zoll Medical Israel Ltd. | Monitoring and diagnostics systems and methods |
CN110478036B (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2022-05-17 | 直观外科手术操作公司 | System and method for integrated surgical table |
US10624807B2 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2020-04-21 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | System and method for integrated surgical table icons |
EP3212105A4 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2018-07-11 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | System and method for monitoring control points during reactive motion |
US10272569B2 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2019-04-30 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | System and method for instrument disturbance compensation |
JP6676061B2 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2020-04-08 | インテュイティブ サージカル オペレーションズ, インコーポレイテッド | System and method for integrated operating table motion |
US10405944B2 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2019-09-10 | Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. | Medical device with active brake release control |
KR102476611B1 (en) | 2014-10-27 | 2022-12-12 | 인튜어티브 서지컬 오퍼레이션즈 인코포레이티드 | System and method for registering to a surgical table |
WO2016115175A1 (en) | 2015-01-12 | 2016-07-21 | KYMA Medical Technologies, Inc. | Systems, apparatuses and methods for radio frequency-based attachment sensing |
US9872663B2 (en) * | 2015-02-04 | 2018-01-23 | Dentsply Sirona Inc. | Methods, systems, apparatuses, and computer programs for removing marker artifact contribution from a tomosynthesis dataset |
US10426555B2 (en) | 2015-06-03 | 2019-10-01 | Covidien Lp | Medical instrument with sensor for use in a system and method for electromagnetic navigation |
USD778441S1 (en) * | 2015-09-10 | 2017-02-07 | 7D Surgical Inc. | Fiducial marker support |
US9962134B2 (en) | 2015-10-28 | 2018-05-08 | Medtronic Navigation, Inc. | Apparatus and method for maintaining image quality while minimizing X-ray dosage of a patient |
US10478254B2 (en) | 2016-05-16 | 2019-11-19 | Covidien Lp | System and method to access lung tissue |
EP3375399B1 (en) | 2016-10-05 | 2022-05-25 | NuVasive, Inc. | Surgical navigation system |
US10418705B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2019-09-17 | Covidien Lp | Electromagnetic navigation antenna assembly and electromagnetic navigation system including the same |
US10722311B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-07-28 | Covidien Lp | System and method for identifying a location and/or an orientation of an electromagnetic sensor based on a map |
US10638952B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-05-05 | Covidien Lp | Methods, systems, and computer-readable media for calibrating an electromagnetic navigation system |
US10615500B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-04-07 | Covidien Lp | System and method for designing electromagnetic navigation antenna assemblies |
US10751126B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-08-25 | Covidien Lp | System and method for generating a map for electromagnetic navigation |
US10792106B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2020-10-06 | Covidien Lp | System for calibrating an electromagnetic navigation system |
US10446931B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2019-10-15 | Covidien Lp | Electromagnetic navigation antenna assembly and electromagnetic navigation system including the same |
US10517505B2 (en) | 2016-10-28 | 2019-12-31 | Covidien Lp | Systems, methods, and computer-readable media for optimizing an electromagnetic navigation system |
US11478662B2 (en) | 2017-04-05 | 2022-10-25 | Accuray Incorporated | Sequential monoscopic tracking |
WO2019030746A1 (en) | 2017-08-10 | 2019-02-14 | Zoll Medical Israel Ltd. | Systems, devices and methods for physiological monitoring of patients |
US11219489B2 (en) | 2017-10-31 | 2022-01-11 | Covidien Lp | Devices and systems for providing sensors in parallel with medical tools |
CN108237528A (en) * | 2018-02-11 | 2018-07-03 | 苏州三德精密机械有限公司 | Adjust arm |
US10589360B2 (en) | 2018-06-17 | 2020-03-17 | Arevo, Inc. | Systems of articles of manufacture with corresponding fiducial marks and dimensional variations |
US10806339B2 (en) | 2018-12-12 | 2020-10-20 | Voxel Rad, Ltd. | Systems and methods for treating cancer using brachytherapy |
US11612440B2 (en) | 2019-09-05 | 2023-03-28 | Nuvasive, Inc. | Surgical instrument tracking devices and related methods |
Family Cites Families (51)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2622592A (en) * | 1952-01-05 | 1952-12-23 | Rosenstein Max | X-ray marker for artificial femoral heads |
FR1266386A (en) * | 1959-09-01 | 1961-07-07 | Screws to insert into bones | |
US3223087A (en) * | 1960-06-18 | 1965-12-14 | Chirana Praha Np | Stereotaxic device |
US4036492A (en) * | 1975-11-10 | 1977-07-19 | Marvin Glass & Associates | Game apparatus |
GB1540099A (en) * | 1976-01-21 | 1979-02-07 | Emi Ltd | Radiography |
US4127110A (en) * | 1976-05-24 | 1978-11-28 | Huntington Institute Of Applied Medical Research | Implantable pressure transducer |
US4386602A (en) * | 1977-05-17 | 1983-06-07 | Sheldon Charles H | Intracranial surgical operative apparatus |
DE7805301U1 (en) * | 1978-02-22 | 1978-07-06 | Howmedica International, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Kiel, 2300 Kiel | Distal aiming device for locking nailing |
US4263916A (en) * | 1978-03-27 | 1981-04-28 | University Of Southern California | Image averaging for angiography by registration and combination of serial images |
CH632922A5 (en) * | 1978-10-06 | 1982-11-15 | Sulzer Ag | Anchorage pin for bone implants |
US4341220A (en) * | 1979-04-13 | 1982-07-27 | Pfizer Inc. | Stereotactic surgery apparatus and method |
DE2948986C2 (en) * | 1979-12-05 | 1982-10-28 | Siemens AG, 1000 Berlin und 8000 München | Medical examination facility |
US4638798A (en) * | 1980-09-10 | 1987-01-27 | Shelden C Hunter | Stereotactic method and apparatus for locating and treating or removing lesions |
GB2084468B (en) * | 1980-09-25 | 1984-06-06 | South African Inventions | Surgical implant |
SU955916A1 (en) * | 1980-10-30 | 1982-09-07 | за вители | Stereotaxic apparatus |
AU7986682A (en) * | 1981-02-12 | 1982-08-19 | New York University | Apparatus for stereotactic surgery |
FR2505495A1 (en) * | 1981-05-05 | 1982-11-12 | Centre Nat Rech Scient | METHOD AND DEVICES FOR MEASURING TEMPERATURE OF A MICROWAVE BODY |
US4465069A (en) * | 1981-06-04 | 1984-08-14 | Barbier Jean Y | Cranial insertion of surgical needle utilizing computer-assisted tomography |
DE8208970U1 (en) * | 1982-03-30 | 1982-09-09 | Howmedica International, Inc. Zweigniederlassung Kiel, 2301 Schönkirchen | Distal aiming device for an interlocking nail |
US4608635A (en) * | 1982-08-03 | 1986-08-26 | Thomas Jefferson University | Method and apparatus for tomographic diagnosis |
US4485815A (en) * | 1982-08-30 | 1984-12-04 | Kurt Amplatz | Device and method for fluoroscope-monitored percutaneous puncture treatment |
US4608492A (en) * | 1983-05-19 | 1986-08-26 | Teledyne Industries, Inc. | Ultraviolet monitor suntan alarm with self test routines |
JPS6086313U (en) * | 1983-11-22 | 1985-06-14 | 株式会社 八光電機製作所 | Stereotaxic neurosurgery device using sheath guidance |
CH661199A5 (en) * | 1983-12-22 | 1987-07-15 | Sulzer Ag | MARKING IMPLANT. |
JPS60152942A (en) * | 1984-01-23 | 1985-08-12 | Toshiba Corp | Nmr-ct scan planning system |
US4580561A (en) * | 1984-05-04 | 1986-04-08 | Williamson Theodore J | Interstitial implant system |
US4583538A (en) * | 1984-05-04 | 1986-04-22 | Onik Gary M | Method and apparatus for stereotaxic placement of probes in the body utilizing CT scanner localization |
GB8412652D0 (en) * | 1984-05-17 | 1984-06-20 | Narang O V | Surgical targetting device |
US4572198A (en) * | 1984-06-18 | 1986-02-25 | Varian Associates, Inc. | Catheter for use with NMR imaging systems |
US4710716A (en) * | 1985-09-20 | 1987-12-01 | Elscint Ltd. | Slice orientation selection arrangement |
JPH056968Y2 (en) * | 1984-10-19 | 1993-02-23 | ||
JPH0354726Y2 (en) * | 1984-10-19 | 1991-12-04 | ||
US4667660A (en) * | 1985-02-19 | 1987-05-26 | Ace Medical Company | Universal orthopedic traction tongs assembly |
US4612930A (en) * | 1985-03-19 | 1986-09-23 | Bremer Paul W | Head fixation apparatus including crown and skull pin |
GB8507449D0 (en) * | 1985-03-22 | 1985-05-01 | Quantel Ltd | Video image processing systems |
DE3614142C2 (en) * | 1985-04-26 | 1996-03-28 | Toshiba Kawasaki Kk | Use of a material for diagnosis by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy |
CH671873A5 (en) * | 1985-10-03 | 1989-10-13 | Synthes Ag | |
DE3531389A1 (en) * | 1985-09-03 | 1987-03-05 | Kirsch Axel | ENOSSAL IMPLANT |
US4764756A (en) * | 1985-09-17 | 1988-08-16 | Sekerheid En Elektronika Laboratoria (Eiendoms) Beperk | Intrusion detector using a vibration-responsive cable |
US4629451A (en) * | 1985-09-23 | 1986-12-16 | Victory Engineering Corp. | Stereotaxic array plug |
US5078140A (en) * | 1986-05-08 | 1992-01-07 | Kwoh Yik S | Imaging device - aided robotic stereotaxis system |
US4791934A (en) * | 1986-08-07 | 1988-12-20 | Picker International, Inc. | Computer tomography assisted stereotactic surgery system and method |
US4769756A (en) * | 1986-08-07 | 1988-09-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Department Of Health And Human Services | Systematic method for matching existing radiographic projections with radiographs to be produced from a specified region of interest in cancellous bone |
US4793355A (en) * | 1987-04-17 | 1988-12-27 | Biomagnetic Technologies, Inc. | Apparatus for process for making biomagnetic measurements |
DE3717871C3 (en) * | 1987-05-27 | 1995-05-04 | Georg Prof Dr Schloendorff | Method and device for reproducible visual representation of a surgical intervention |
US4838264A (en) * | 1987-08-18 | 1989-06-13 | Bremer Orthopedics, Inc. | Torque limiting device for use with bone penetrating pins |
US4931056A (en) * | 1987-09-04 | 1990-06-05 | Neurodynamics, Inc. | Catheter guide apparatus for perpendicular insertion into a cranium orifice |
US4991579A (en) * | 1987-11-10 | 1991-02-12 | Allen George S | Method and apparatus for providing related images over time of a portion of the anatomy using fiducial implants |
US4869247A (en) * | 1988-03-11 | 1989-09-26 | The University Of Virginia Alumni Patents Foundation | Video tumor fighting system |
US5050608A (en) * | 1988-07-12 | 1991-09-24 | Medirand, Inc. | System for indicating a position to be operated in a patient's body |
US4860331A (en) * | 1988-09-12 | 1989-08-22 | Williams John F | Image marker device |
-
1987
- 1987-11-10 US US07/119,353 patent/US4991579A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1988
- 1988-07-18 US US07/223,975 patent/US4945914A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-10-23 GB GB8824928A patent/GB2212371B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-11-01 CA CA000581885A patent/CA1317036C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1988-11-02 AU AU24593/88A patent/AU2459388A/en not_active Abandoned
- 1988-11-08 ES ES8803393A patent/ES2013810A6/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-11-09 IT IT8867997A patent/IT1227797B/en active
- 1988-11-09 FR FR8814653A patent/FR2627075B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-11-09 DE DE3838011A patent/DE3838011C2/en not_active Revoked
- 1988-11-09 SE SE8804056A patent/SE8804056L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1988-11-10 JP JP63284811A patent/JP2732618B2/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1988-11-10 BR BR888805881A patent/BR8805881A/en unknown
-
1990
- 1990-01-19 US US07/467,243 patent/US5119817A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-01-19 US US07/467,242 patent/US5094241A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1990-02-13 US US07/479,263 patent/US5016639A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1990-02-13 US US07/479,262 patent/US5097839A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1991
- 1991-03-29 US US07/677,088 patent/US5211164A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-03-29 US US07/677,096 patent/US5178164A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1991-06-14 GB GB919113228A patent/GB9113228D0/en active Pending
- 1991-06-14 GB GB9113229A patent/GB2246936B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1992
- 1992-07-02 AU AU19414/92A patent/AU648184B2/en not_active Ceased
-
1993
- 1993-01-20 CA CA000616562A patent/CA1334035C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1993-02-26 US US08/026,223 patent/US5397329A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1993-10-08 AU AU48868/93A patent/AU658333B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1993-10-08 AU AU48902/93A patent/AU657438B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1993-10-08 AU AU48869/93A patent/AU657436B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1993-10-08 AU AU48892/93A patent/AU657437B2/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CA1334035C (en) | Fiducial implant and method of using the same | |
US5222499A (en) | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy | |
US6359959B1 (en) | System for determining target positions in the body observed in CT image data | |
US10603133B2 (en) | Image guided augmented reality method and a surgical navigation of wearable glasses using the same | |
Lavallee et al. | Computer-assisted spine surgery: a technique for accurate transpedicular screw fixation using CT data and a 3-D optical localizer | |
Kalfas et al. | Application of frameless stereotaxy to pedicle screw fixation of the spine | |
US5901199A (en) | High-speed inter-modality image registration via iterative feature matching | |
EP0501993B1 (en) | Probe-correlated viewing of anatomical image data | |
Nolte et al. | A new approach to computer-aided spine surgery: fluoroscopy-based surgical navigation | |
US6718194B2 (en) | Computer assisted intramedullary rod surgery system with enhanced features | |
US5483961A (en) | Magnetic field digitizer for stereotactic surgery | |
Pelizzari et al. | Interactive 3D patient—image registration | |
Tamura et al. | Surface-based registration accuracy of CT-based image-guided spine surgery | |
CA2028065C (en) | Method and apparatus for imaging the anatomy | |
Jones et al. | A frameless method for stereotactic radiotherapy | |
Hauser et al. | A non-invasive patient registration and reference system for interactive intraoperative localization in intranasal sinus surgery | |
Kong et al. | Augmented Reality Navigation Using Surgical Guides Versus Conventional Techniques in Pedicle Screw Placement |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
MKLA | Lapsed |