CA1303015C - Tin or bismuth complex catalysts and trigger cure of coatings therewith - Google Patents

Abstract

TIN OR BISMUTH COMPLEX CATALYSTS AND TRIGGER
CURE OF COATINGS THEREWITH

ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE

Disclosed is an activatable catalyst which is effective for the reaction of a hydroxyl compound and an isocyanate. Preferably, the catalyst is utilized in the cure of a coating composition of a polyol and a polyisocyanate. The activatable catalyst is activated in the presence of an amine activator or heat and comprises the reaction product of a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof; and a molar excess of a complexing agent. The complexing agent is selected from a mercapto compound, a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine activator, and mixtures thereof. A single polyol resin may bear both the complexing functionality and the activatable catalyst. Advantageously, the polyol and polyisocyanate both are aliphatic.

Description

i3030iS ASi~ 2-4846-3 TIN OR BISMUTH COMPLEX CATALYSTS AND TRIGGER
CURE OF COATINGS THEREWITH

Back~round of the Invention The present invention relates to polyol/polyisocyanate coating compositions and more particularly to a unique catalyst system effective therefor.
Vapor permeation curable coatings traditionally are a class of coatings formulated from aromatic hydroxyl-functional polymers and multi-isocyanate cross-linking agents wherein an applied film thereof is cured by exposure to a vaporous tertiary amine catalyst. In order to contain and hsndle the vaporous tertiary amlne catalyst eccnomically and sarely, curing chambers were developed. Curing chambers typically are substantially empty boxes through which a conveyor bearing the coated substrate passes and in which the vaporous tertiary amine, normally borne by an inert gas carrier, contacts such coated substrate. The use of aromatic hydroxy-functional polymers is recommended if an extended pot life system is required. I~ two~ack rormulations are acceptable, then use of aliphatic hydroxyl-functional resins can be made. Multi-isocyanate crosslinking agents in traditional vapor permeation curable coatings contain at least some aromatic isocyanate groups in order for practical cure rates to be achieved.
Such traditional vapor permeation curable coatings requirements have been altered to a degree by the vaporous amine catalyst spray method disclosed by Blegen in U.S. Pat. No. 4,517,222. 8uch vaporous catalyst spray method relies on the concurrent generation o~ an atomizate of a coating composition and a carrier gas bearing a catalytic amount of a vaporous tertiary amine catalyst. Such generated atomizate and vsporous catslytic amine-bearing carrier gas flow are admixed and directed onto a substrste to form a film thereover. Curing is rapid and use of a curing chamber is not _l_ A

1~0301S
required. Moreover, all aliphatic isocyanate curing agents can be utilized in such spray process. Aromatic hydroxyl groups on the resin, however, ~till are required.
One drawback to the requirement of aromatic hydroxyl groups on the 5 resin is the inherent limitation which such aromaticity-provides in formulating high solids coatings. The same is true of the requirement of aromaticity in the multi-isocyanate cross-linking agent. Such non-volatile solids content restriction even applies to the vaporous amine catalyst spray method described above.
Despite the improvements in the vapor permeation curable coatings field, all-aliphatic, high-performance urethane top coats still have yet to be developed. Instead, such urethane top coats traditionally are heat-cured in the presence of a tin or like metal catalyst. There is a need in the art for adapting vapor permeation curable coatings technology to such urethane top coats desirably utilizing conventional tin catalyst systems. Such need in the art is addressed by the present invention.

Broad Statement of the Invention The present invention solves many of the limitations which have been placed on chamber-cured vapor permeation curable coatings and on spray cured vapor permeation curable coatings by adapting conventional urethane top coat formulations to be applied and cured by traditional vapor permeation curable coatings technology. More generally, however, the novel catalysts of the present invention respond in traditional heat-cured urethane systems also.
One aspect of the present invention comprises an activatable catalyst effective for the reaction of a hydroxyl group and an isocyanate group and being activated in the presence of an amine catalyst or heat. Such activatable catalyst comprises the reaction product of a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof and a molar excess of a complexing agent. The complexing agent is selected from the group of a mercapto compound, a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine catalyst, and mixtures thereof.
A further aspect of the present invention is a catalyzed reaction mixture which comprises a polyol, a polyisocyanate, optionally solvent, and the activatable caWyst set forth above. Another aspect of the present 1303~)1S
invention is a catalyzed reaction mixture wherein the polyol resin bears the complexing agent functionality which then is complexed with the tin catalyst or bismuth catalyst. The catalyzed reaction mixture further comprises the polyisocyanate and optionally solvent.
Yet another aspect of the present invention is a method for curing the catalyzed reaction mixture which comprises applying a film of the catalyzed reaction mixture to a substrate wherein the catalyzed reaction mixture is set forth above. The applied film then is exposed to an amine activator or heat for effecting cure. Utilizing the amine activator, cure proceeds at room temperature.
Yet a further aspect of the present invention involves the application of the catalyzed reaction mixture as an atomizate, which atomizate is mixed with an amine activator and the mixture applied to a substrate as a film. The amine activator can be present in the catalyzed reaction mixture as a vapor or as a liquid.
Still another aspect of the present invention is directed to a method for improving the pot life of Q catalyzed reaction mixture of a polyol and a polyisocyanate wherein the catalyst is selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, or mixtures thereof. This method comprises reacting the catalyst with a molar excess of a complexing agent selected from a mercapto group, a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group {n the presence of a teriary amine activator, and mixtures thereof. Additional stability can be gained by further blending a chelating agent therewith.
Advantages of the present invention include the ability to formulate a catalyzed reaction mixture which has a very long and useful pot life.
Another advantage is that such reaction mixture can be rapidly cured merely in the presence of an amine activator. A further advantage is that the catalyzed reaction mixture need not be heated for achieving cure, but can be heat cured if desired. Yet another advantage is the ability to utilize the inventive catalyst system in conventional urethane coating compositions, especially high-performance urethane top coats. These and other advantages will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art based upon the disclosure contained herein.

1~030~5 Brief Description of the Drawin~s Fi~. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of the catalyst complex formation and subsequent actuation as illustrated by a tin catalyst and a mercapto complexing agent;
Fig. 2 graphically portrays percent fi hour viscosity change versus catalyst concentration for the coating composition of Example III;
Fig. 3 graphically portrays 1 hour MEK rub data versus catalyst concentration for the coating composition of Example 111;
Fig. 4 graphically portrays 1 hour MEK rub data versus catalyst concentration for the coating composition of Example IV; and Figs 5-7 graphically portray pot life data and MEK rub data versus catalyst concentration for the coating compositions of Example V with and without the novel tin/mercaptan complex.
The drawings will be described in detail below.
Deta~led Description of the Invention .

Conventional urethane coatings, especially top coats, are provided as two separate packages (a two-pack system). One pack, typically Part A, is the polyol while the second pack, Part B, is the polyisocyanate. Solvents and other conventional paint additives are added to each pack in accordance with conventional teachings. The catalyst, typically a tin or other metal catalyst, often 1s included in the polyol pack in order to ensure against premature gelation of the polyisocyanate. Occasionally, the catalyst package i8 not added to either Part A or Part B until ~ust prior to application Or the coating composition.
Application of such conventional two-pack coating compositions typically comprehend the admixture of the two packs just before application which may be by conventional roll coat, reverse roll coat, or other conventional tactile means; or can be by spray techniques utilizing a conventional two-head spray gun. Regardless of the application technique, the two packs are kept separate in order to prevent premature reaction with attendant viscosity increase which prevents effective application. The applied coatings often are baked in order to speed the cure and ensure expulsion of solvent from the applied film.
One of the unigue features of the inventive catalyst system involves the extended pot lives which result by virtue of its use. Such extended pot lives are realized without the need for formulating specially designed resins, curing agents, or the like. Yet, the catalyzed reaction mixture can be cured "on demand" or "triggered" merely by presenting sn amine activator to, or by heat;ng of, the catalyzed reaction mixture. Such a combination of chsracteristics does not result even from the use of conventional tin 5 mercaptide catalysts alone and this point is important. The catalyst system of the present invention is not a tin mercaptide, but is the reaction product of a tin catalyst and a molar excess of a complexing agent such as a mercapto compound which reaction product is formed at room temperature merely upon mixing, referred to herein as a tin/mercaptan complex catalyst.
10 In fact, even a tin mercaptide catalyzed coating composition can have its pot life extended by the addition of a mercapto compound. Whether a tin mercaptide/mercapto complex is formed is not known precisely, though the combination of extended pot life and rspid cure in the presence of an amine activator has been confirmed experimentally. Much of the description 15 herein refers to a tin catalyst and a mercapto complexing agent by way of illustration and not by way of limitation.
In this regard, it should be understood that a molar excess of mercapto compound to tln catalyst is used to form the novel tin catalyst/mercaptan complexes. By molar excess of mercapto compound is meant that sufficient 20 mercapto compound is added to the tin catalyst so that the pot life of a polyol/polyisocyanate mixture has a pot life at least twice as long as the same mixture containing only the tin catalyst (I.e. sans mercspto compound). Generally, this translates into a molar ratio of mercapto compound to tin catalyst of between about 2:1 and 500:1, depending upon 25 the particular choice of tin catalyst, mercapto compound, other formulation ingredients, etc. For present purposes, the pot life of a coating composition is the time reguired for the viscosity of the coating in an open pot to double from its initial viscosity.
Without being bound by theory, it appears that the tin catalyst and the 30 mercapto compound form a complex which blocks or otherwise renders unreactive the tin catalyst. The structure of the complex and reaction for its formation are illustrated at Fig. 1. Referring to Fig. 1, catalyst structure I is a conventional tin catalyst such as dibutyltin dilaurate, for example, where ligands X would be laurate groups. It is believed that the 35 initial reaction occurring upon the addition of a mercapto compound, e.g.
R'SH, involves the displacement of two of the ligands, e.g. the laurate groups, with their replacement by the mercapto groups to yield catalyst species II. Both catalyst species I and II are active catalyst species in that they promote the hydroxyl/isocyanate resction.
Next, upon the addition of excess mercapto compound, an equilibrium reaction is established between catalyst species Il and III. It will be appreciated that this reaction involves the tin metal being converted from a tetracoordinate species to a hexacoordinate species upon the coordination of additional mercapto groups therewith. Catalyst species 111 is inactive and is the novel catalyst species of the present invention. It is catalyst species III which permits a catalyzed system to be formulated which retains excellent pot life. It also is catalyst species III which is able to be activated or triggered on demand.
The trigger which converts catalyst species Ill to Qn active form comprises either an amine Ot heat. It is possible that the trigger results in the release of catalyst species II, IV, or a combination. Regardless of which active species is released, the presence of the trigger, e.g. amine or heat, and isocyanate functionality is reguired. The isocyanate functionality is reactive with the complexing agent (e.g. mercapto group) which enhances the conversion of inactive catalyst species III to active catalyst species II orIV. The released or displaced mercapto groups react with the free isocyanate groups in the coating, forming thiocarbamate linkages.
Thiocarbamate linkages have been shown to be catalytic in the hydroxyl/isocyanate reaction in U.S. Patent No. 4,753,825.
Such thiocarbamate linkages only serve to further promote the hydroxyl/isocyanate reaction and cure of the coating.
It will be apprecisted that Pig. 1 and the foregoing description are illustrative of the present invention in that the active metal catalyst can be bismuth also. Por that m~tter, the complexing agent also may be a polyphenol as described in further detail below.
Referring now to the tin catalyst, a variety of conventional tin catalysts can be used advantageously in the inventive catalyst system and catalyzed reaction mixture of the present invention. Conventional tin catalysts include, for example stannous octoate, dibutyltin dicarboxylates (e.g. dibutyltin dioctoate), tin mercaptides (e.~. dibutyltin - dilaurylmercaptide), stannous acetste, stannic oxide, st6nnous citrate, stannous oxylate, stannous chloride, stannic chloride, tetra-phenyl tin, tetra-butyl tin, tri-n-butyl tin acetate, di-n-butyl tin dilaurate, dimethyl tindichloride, and the like and even mixtures thereof. It is conceivable that ~.,,,~

certain tin catalysts and certain mercaptans tor polyphenols) may not form as effective complexes as is desirable due to steric hindrance. Still, it is believed that a usable complex can be formed from most tin catalysts and most mercaptans (and polyphenols).
A variety of conventional bismuth catalysts also can be used to advantage in the present invention. Conventional bismuth catalysts include, for example, bismuth tricarboxylates (e.g. acetates, oleates, etc.), bismuth nitrate, bismuth halides (e.g. bromide, chloride, iodide, etc.), bismuth sulfide, basic bismuth dicarboxylates (e.g. bismuthyl bis-neodecanoate, bismuth subsalicylate, bismuth subgallate, etc), and the like and mixtures thereof.
Referring now to the mercaptans, a variety of mono-functional and poly-functional mercaptans can be used to advantage in accordance with the precepts of the present invention. Representative mercaptans include, for example, trimethylol propane tri~3-mercapto propionate), pentaerythritrol tetra~3-mercapto propionate), glycol di~3-mercapto propionate), glycol di-mercapto acetate, trimethylol propane trithioglycolate, mercapto diethyl ether, ethane dithiol, thiolactic acid, mercapto propionic acid and esters thereof, thiophenol, thio acetic acid, 2-mercapto ethanol, 1,4-butanedithiol, 2-3-dimercapto propanol, toluene-3,4-dithiol, alpha,alpha'-dimercapto-para-xylene, thiosalicylic acid, mer¢apto acetic acid, dodecane dithiol, didodecane dithiol, di-thio phenol, di-para-chlorothiophenol, dimercapto benzothiazole, 3,4-dimercapto toluene, allyl mercaptan, benzyl mercaptan, 1,6-hexane dithiol, l-octane thiol, para-thiocresol, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol, cyclohexyl mercaptan, methylthioglycolate, various mercapto pyridines, dithioerythritrol, 6-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, d-limonene dimercaptan, and the like and mixtures thereof. Further useful mercaptans can be found in various catalogs Or commercially-available mercaptans.
In addition to supplying a monofunctional or polyfunctional mercaptan monomer or oligomer, a variety of resinous compounds can be synthesized or modified to contain pendant mercaptan or thiol groups. Various mercaptans suitable for synthesizing the mercapto-functional resinous materials for use in forming the coating compositions of the present im~ention include, for example, 1,4-butane dithiol, 2,3-dimercapto propanol, toluene-3,4-dithiol, and alpha,alpha'-dimercapto-p-xylene. Other suitable active mercaptan compounds include thiosalicylic acid, mercapto acetic acid, 2-mercapto - ethanol, dodecane dithiol, didodecane dithiol, dith;ol phenol, di-pare-chlorothiophenol, dimercapto benzothiazole, 3,4-dimercapto toluene, allyl mercaptan, 1,6 hexane dithiol, mercapto propionic acid, p-thiocresol, d-limonene dimercaptan, cyclohexyl mercaptan, methylthioglycolate, mercapto pyridines, dithioerythritrol, 6-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, and the like. Further useful mercaptans can be found in various catalogs of commercially-available mercaptans.
Virtually any oligomer, polymer, or resinous compound can be modified to contain pendant mercaptan or thiol groups. Representative resinous materials containing mercaptan groups can be derived from, for example, epoxy and epoxy-modified diglycidyl ethers of bisphenol A structures, mercaptan-functional urethane resins, various aliphatic polyethylene or polypropylene glycol (diglycidyl ether) adducts, and glycidyl ethers of phenolic resins. Other useful polymers containing pendant mercaptan groups lS include polyamide resins, for example, condensation products of dimerized fatty acids coreacted with difunctional amine, such as ethylene diamine, followed by reaction with 3-mercapto propionic acid or the like. A variety of acrylic resins snd vinyl resins can be readily envisioned for modification in accordance with the precepts of the present invention additionally.
ao In this regard, it should be understood that virtually any conventional hydroxyl-containlng monomer, oligomer, or polymer previously proposed for use in vapor permeation curable coatings can be suitably modified to contain pendant mercaptan groups for use in formulating coating compositions in accordance with the present invention. For example, esterification (or transesterification) of such polyols with a mercaptan-terminated acid is but one technique which can be readily envisioned for use in modifying such prior vapor permeation curable materials for use in formulating the coating compositions of the present invention. While not exhaustive, the following discussion discloses prior vapor permeation curable coating compositions which can be suitably modified. U.S. Pat. No. 3,409,579 discloses a binder composition of a phenol-aldehyde resin (including resole, novolac, and resitole), which preferably is a benzylic ether or a polyether phenol resin.
U.S. Pat. No. 3,676,392 discloses a resin composition in an organic solvent composed of a polyether phenol or a methylol-terminated phenolic (resole) resin. U.S. Pat. No. 3,429,848 discloses a composition like that in U.S. Pat.
No. 3,409,579 with the addition of a silane thereto.

U.S. Pat. No. 3,789,044 d;scloses a polyepoxide resin capped with hydroxybenzoic acid. U.S. Pat. No. 3,822,226 discloses a curable composition of a phenol reacted with an unsaturated material selected from unsaturated fatty acids, oils, fatty acid esters, butadiene h~nopolymers, butadiene copolymers, alcohols and acids. U.S. Pat. No. 3,836,491 discloses a similar hydroxy-functional polymer (e.g. polyester, acrylic, polye~her, etc.) capped with hydroxybenzoic acid. British Pat. 1,369,351 discloses a hydroxy or epoxy compound which has been capped with diphenolic acid.
British Pat. 1,351,881 modifies a polyhydroxy, polyepoxy, or polycarboxyl resin with the reaction product of a phenol and an aldehyde.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,967,117 discloses a polyhydroxy polyester while U.S.
Pat. No. 4,267,239 reacts an alkyd resin with para-hydroxybenzoic acid.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,298,658 proposes an alkyd resin modified with 2,6-dimethylol-p-cresol.
V.S. Pats. Nos. 4,343,839, 4,365,039, and 4,374,167 disclose polyester resin coatings especially adapted for flexible substrates. U.S. Pat. No.
4,374,181 discloses resins especially adapted for application to reaction in3ection molded (RIM) urethane parts. U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,782 discloses a hydroxybenzoic acid-epoxy adduct. U.S. Pat. No. 4,343,924 proposes a ao stabilized phenol-functional condensation product of a phenol-aldehyde reaction product. U.S. Pat. No. 4,366,193 proposes the use of 1,2-dihydroxybenzene or derivatives thereof in vapor permeation curable coatings. U.S. Pat. No. 4,368,222 discloses the uniqueness of utilizing vapor permeation curable coatings on surface-porous substrates of fibrous-25 reinforced molding compounds te.g. SMC). Einally, U.S. Pat. No. 4,396,647 discloses the use of 2,3',4-trihydroxy diphenyl.
It will be appreciated that the foregoing aromatic-hydroxyl polymers or resins as well as many other resins suitably can be modified to contain mercaptan groups for use in formulating coating compositions in accordance 30 with the precepts of the present invention.
The hydroxy compound also may be a hydroxy urethane prepoIymer which can be a polyol or monomeric alcohol provided from a polyester, polyether, polyurethane, polysulfide, or the like. Ethylenic unsaturation even can be provided by the monomeric alcohol or polyol itself or can be 35 reacted onto a polyol or monomeric alcohol subsequently by conventional reaction schemes, if such unsaturation is desirable. Conventional reaction schemes call for the reaction of a monomeric alcohol or polyol with, for _g_ , .

example, acrylic acids, acrylyl halides, acrylic-terminated ethers, acrylic or methacrylic anhydrides~ isocyanate-terminated acrylates, epoxy acrylates, and the like. Further reaction schemes for formulating hydroxy urethane prepolymers include reaction of a hydroxy-acrylate monomer, hydroxy methacrylate monomer, or an allyl ether alcohol with a cyclic anhydride such as, for example, the anydrides: maleic, phthalic, succinic, norborene, glutaric, and the like. Unsaturated polyol-polyestels optionally then can be reacted with a suitable oxirsne, such as, for example, ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, glycidyl acrylate, allyl glycidyl ether, alpha-olefin epoxides, butyl glycidyl ether, and the like. Suitable allyl alcohols include, for example, trimethylolpropane monoallyl ether, trimethylol propane diallyl ether, allyl hydroxylpropylether~ and the like.
Additional conventional reaction schemes for producing a hydroxy urethane prepolymer include reacting alpha-aliphatic or aromatic substituted acrylic acids with an oxirane compound, and reacting a hydroxy acrylate or hydroxy methacrylate with dimercaptan compound. Any of the foregoing compounds also can be reacted further with a diisocyanate to produce a hydroxy urethane prepolymer having urethane linkages. Thus, it will be observed that there i5 almost no llmit to the tgpes of polyols and their synthesi~ ~or use in accordance with the precepts of the present invention.
An additional unique embodiment of the present invention involves the modification of a polyol resin to contain but a few pendant mercaptan or thiol groups which mercaptsn or thiol groups can be complexed with the tin catalyst. While synthesis of ~uch modified resins would appear to be routine, it has been discovered to be guite difficult to control the reaction so that the resulting resinous products predominate in hydroxyl groups.
Thus, a reaction scheme based on the Dammann process as disclosed in Commonly-assigned U.S. Pate~t No. 4,732,945.
The Dammann process relates to the synthesis of aliphatic polyol resins which contain a minor proportion of aromatic hydroxyl or mercapto groups. The basic reaction scheme developed in accordance with the Dammann process involves the formation of a glycidyl-functional polyol (e.g. acrylic polyol) in a first stage followed by the addition of a mercapto-compound containing carboxyl or other functionality reactive with the glycidyl groups in a second stage reaction. Thus, a variety of polyol resins, such as those described above, can be suitably modified in accordance with , , r ", . .

the Dammann process to contain a minor proportion of mercaptan groups, rather than a major proportion of mercaptan groups as such synthesis techniques were described aboYe. The examples will demonstrate such a unique resin which provides aliphatic tot aromatic) hydroxyl lunc~ionality, 5 mercaptan groups, and the tin catalyst in a single molecule. Such embodiment contributes to the ability to formulate coatings compositions at much higher solids than was heretofore possible.
An additional class of compounds which have been demonstrated to be effective in forming an inactive tin or bismuth cstalyst complex comprises a 10 particular class of polyphenols which are characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine activator.
Absent the tertiary amine catalyst, the polyphenols will tend to be quite unreactive with isocyanate groups for extended periods of time. It is believed that the polyphenols can form a hexacoordinate complex with tin, 15 such as catalyst species III of Fig. 1. The polyphenols, being reactable withisocyanate functionality in the presence of tertiary amine activator, behave as do mercapto groups in the presence of tertiary amine activators. Heat, too, will promote the release of an active tin catalyst species.
Representative polyphenols which function for forming the novel inactive 20 tin or bismuth catalyst complex of the present invention include a catechol, pyrogallol, 3-methoxy catechol, and the like. These polyphenols are more fully disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,366,193.
With respect to the proportions Or catalyst system, the proportion of tin or bismuth catalyst should be adjusted to be in an effective cstalytic 25 amount for the polyol/polylsocyanate reaction. Typically, this translates into active tin/bismuth catalyst concentration leve]s rsnging from about 0.0001 to about 1.0 weight percent. The proportion of mercaptan or polyphenol generally is adjusted to be substantially in excess of the proportion of tin/bismuth catalyst. At higher complexing agent/metal 30 catalyst ratios, better stability (pot life) is observed while cure of the coating composition is not as fast. At a given ratio, higher metal catalyst levels provide faster cure, but shorter pot life. Catalyst/complexing agent ratios will vary depending upon the particular tin or bismuth catalyst, the particular mercaptan or polyphenol, the polyol and polyisocyanate of choice, 35 and the performance requirements desired. Generally, however, catalyst/complexing agent mole ratios ranging from about 2:1 to about 500:1 _l l_ 13030~S

have been found to be useful in the catalyzed reaction mixture of the present invention, as discussed above.
Polyisocyanate cross-linking agents cross link with the hydroxyl groups of the resin or polymer under the influence of the tin catalys~to cure the coating. Aromatic, aliphatic, or mixed aromatic/aliphatic isocyanates may be used. Of course, polymeric isocyanates are employed in-order to reduce toxic vapors of isocyanate monomers. Further, alcohol-modified and other modified isocyanate compositions find utility in the invention. Multi-isocyanates preferably will have from about 2-4 isocyanate groups per molecule for use in the coating composition of the present invention.
Suitable multi-isocyanates for use in the present invention include, for example, hexamethylene diisocyanate, 4,4'-toluene diisocyanate (TDI), diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI), polymethyl polyphenyl isocyanate (Polymeric MDI or PAPI), m- and ~phenylene diisocyanates, bitolylene diisocyanate, triphenylmethane triisocyanate, tris-(4-isocyanatophenyl) thiophosphate, cyclohexane diisocyanate ~CHDI), bis~isocyanatomethyl) cyclohexane (H6XM), dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate (H12MDI), trimethylhexane diisocyanate, dimer acid diisocyanate (DDI), dicyclohexylmethane diisocyanate, and dimethyl derivatives thereof, trimethyl hexamethylene diisocyanate, lysine diisocyanate and its methyl ester, isophorone diisocyanate, methyl cyclohexane diisocyanate, 1,5-napthalene diisocyanate, trlphenyl methane triisocyanate, xylylene diisocyanate and methyl and hydrogenated derivatives thereof, polymethylene polyphenyl isocyanates, chlorophenylene-2,4-diisocyanate, and the like and mixtures thereof. Aromatic and aliphatic polyisocyanate dimers, trimers, oligomers, polymers (including biuret and isocyanurate derivatives), and isocyanate functional prepolymers often are available as preformed packages and such packages are suitable for use in the present invention also.
The ratio of isocyanate equivalents of the polyisocyanate cross-linking agents to the hydroxyl groups from the hydroxy resinous materials preferably should be greater than about 1:1 and can range from about 1:2 on up to about 2:1. The precise intended application of the coating composition often will dictate this ratio or isocyanate index.
As noted above, a solvent or vehicle may be included as part of the coating composition. Volatile organic solvents may include ketones and esters for minimizing viscosity, though some aromatic solvent may be 13030~S
necessary and typically is part of the volatiles contained in com mercial isocyanate polymers. Representative volatile organic solvents include, for example, methyl ethyl ketone, acetone, butyl acetate, methyl amyl ketone, methyl isobutyl ketone, ethylene glycol monoethyl ether aceta~e (sold under 5 the trademark Cellosolve acetate), and the like. Organic solvents commercially utilized in polyisocyanate polymers include, for example, toluene, xylene, and the like. It should be noted that the effective non-volatile solids content of the coating composition can be increased by incorporation of a relatively low or non-volatile (high boiling) ester 10 plasticizer which is retained for the most part in the cured film. Such suitable ester plasticizers include, for example, dibutyl phthlate, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthlate (DOP), and the like. The proportion of ester plasticizer should not exceed about 5-109~ by weight, otherwise loss of mar resistance can occur.
The coating composition additionally can contain opacifying pigments and inert extenders such as, for example, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide, clays such as kaolinite clays, silica, talc, carbon or graphite (e.g. for conductive coatings), and the like. Additionally, the coating compositions can contain tinctorial pigments, corrosion-inhibiting pigments, and a variety of agents 20 typically found in coating compositions. Such additional additives include, for example, surractants, flow or leveling agents, pigment dispersants, and the like. The ingredients utilized in making the coating compositions are such that lower acid value systems result. ~igher acid values tend to shorten pot life and retard cure of the coating compositions, as well as may 25 require additional amine to be used ~or achiering cure. Thus, the preference for lower acid value systems.
An additional class of additives which optionally may find utility in the inventive coating compositions of the present invention comprise ketone-based chelating agents. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,314,834 shows that 30 diketo chelating agents are useful for extending the pot lives of urethane propellants. U.S. Pat. No 3,635,906 shows that urethane coating compositions can have improved pot lives if the catalysts are complexed with beta-dicarbonyls, alpha-hydroxy ketones, or fused aromatic beta-hydroxy ketones. Additional ketone-based chelating agents which may find 35 utility in the inventive reaction mixtures include, for example, dialkyl ; malonates, aceto acetic esters, alkyl lactates, and alkyl pyruvates. While such chelnting agents do not provide the degree of pot life which is achieved 1~ 1S

by use of the mercapto compounds or polyphenols of the present invention, their presence can aid in extending the pot life of the system as the examples will demonstrate. Further, it should be understood that such ketone chelating agents do not provide inactive catalyst speci~s which can 5 be triggered by amine or low temperature heating since the ketone-based chelating agents are not reactive w;th isocyanate functionality under normal conditions. In addition, such ketone chelating agents are less effective than mercaptans or phenols at complexing with tin or bismuth, as the examples will demonstrate.
As to the performance requirements which are met by the coating composition, it should be noted that the coating composition can be formulated to have a minimum pot life of at least 4 hours in an open pot and generally the coating can be formulated to have a pot life which exceeds 8 hours and can range up to 18 hours or more. Such extended pot life means 15 that refilling the pot at the plant during shifts generally is not required.
Moreover, the pot life of the coating composition in a closed container can exceed one day depending upon formulation of the coating composition.
After storage of the coating composition, the stored composition can be cut to application viscosity with suitable solvent (if required) and such 20 composition retains all of the excellent performance characteristics which it initially possessed.
The amine activator can be supplied in the liquid phase or the vapor phase and preferably will be a tertiary amine including, for example, tertiary amines containing substituents such as alkyl, alkanol, aryl, 25 cycloaliphatic, and mixtures thereof. Additionally, heterocyclic tertiary amines may be suitable for use In the invention also. Representative tertiary amines include, for example, triethyl amine, dimethyl ethyl amine, tetramethyl ethylene diamine, trimethyl amine, tributyl amine, dimethyl benzyl amine, dimethyl cyclohexyl amine, dimethyl ethanol amine, diethyl 30 ethanol amine, triethanol amine, pyridine, 4-phenylpropyl pyridine, 2,4,6-collidine, quinoline, tripropyl amine, isoquinoline, N-ethyl morpholine, triethylene diamine, and the like and mixtures thereof. Additionally, it is conceivable to use amine oxides and quaternary ammonium amines. A
myriad of proprietary tertiary amine activators currently are available and 35 should function in the process additionally. While the amine activator preferably will be a tertiary amine and preferably presented as a vaporous tertiary amine, it will be appreciated that the tertiary amine may be 1~030~S

presented as a liquid and the present invention function effectively and efficiently. Further, primary and secondary amines also activate the tin/mercaptan catalyst complex, though they are not preferred since longer cure times are experienced therewith. Still, highly-hindered secondary 5 amines may find utility, and may even be preferred, on occasion. Such non-tertiary amines which may be used include, for example, diisopropyl amine, di-t-butyl amine, dibutyl amine, t-butyl amine, diisopropyl amine, 1,1-dimethyl propyl amine, monoethanol amine, diethanol amine, and the like and mixtures thereof.
While the proportion of amine activator may range on up to 6 percent or more, percentages of less than 1 volume percent typically will suffice, e.g. between about 0.25 and I percent by volume. It will be appreciated that the proportion of amine activator will vary depending upon whether the amine activator is presented in its liquid state or in its vaporous state, and whether the amine activator is tertiary, primary, or secondary. Generally speaking, the proportion of liquid amine activator generally will be greater in concentration than with the amine activator supplied as a vapor, though this can vary. The same is true for the primary and secondary amines which require a greater level, appnrently due to their reactivity in the system.
Heat activation of the catalyst complex comprehends baking of the applied coating composition at temperatures ranging from about 50 to 150 C or higher for time periods ranging from about 1 to 30 minutes. Such heating schedule for activation of the catalyst complex typically is less severe than is required for cure of the polyol/polyisocyanate coating composition without the presence of any catalyst. Of course, heating of the coated substrate even when an amine activator is used can be beneficial for solvent expulsion from the film as well as insuring that the film is non-blocking for rapid handling of the coated substrate. Again, such heating schedule tends to be rather mild in terms of temperature and time compared to conventional heat-cured urethane systems.
A variety of substrates can be coated with the coating compositions of the present invention. Substrates include metal, such as, for example, iron, ` steel, aluminum, copper, galvanized steel, zinc, and the like. Additionally, the coating composition can be applied to wood, fiberboard, RlM (reaction 35 injection molding urethanes), SMC (sheet molding compound), vinyl, acrylic, or other polymeric or plastic material, paper, and the like. Since the coeting compositions can be cured at room temperature, thermal damage to ~30301S

thermally-sensitive substrates is not a limitation on use of the coating compositions of the present invention. Further, with the ability to use the vaporous amine catalyst spray method, the flexibility in use oî the coating compositions of the present invention is enhanced even further. It should be 5 understood, however, that heating of the coating composition following application (e.g. between about 50 and 1~0C) often is recommended for enhancing solvent expulsion. In fact, heating at convention~l curing temperatures even may be practiced on occasion.
Finally, it should be understood the present invention can be applied to 10 primers, intermediate CoAts, and top coats, substantially independent of film thickness. In fact, the present invention may provide the ability to formulste a single coating which can function both as a primer and as a top coat (unicoat system).
The following examples show how the present invention can be 15 practiced but should not be construed as limiting. In this application, all percentages and proportions are by weight, unless otherwise expressly indicated. Also, all units are in the metric system and all citations referred to herein are expressly incorporated by re~erence.

EXAMPLE~

Studies were undertaken to determine the effect of mercaptan structure on the stability of the tin/mercaptan complex as measured by 25 viscosity (pot life) of a polyol/polyisocyanate coating com~,osition. A
master batch of costing composition was formulated from TONE 0305 polyol (polycapralactone triol, 100% non-volatile solids, OH number 310, Union Carbide Corporation, 364 g)., DESMODUR~ N3390 polyisocyanate (hexamethylene diisocyanate trimer in ethyl acetate solvent at 9096 solids, 30 Mobay Chemical Company, 481 g.), and methyl amyl ketone (MAK) solvent (300 g.). Various mercaptans were complexed with dibutyl tin dilaurate catalyst (T-12 brand catalyst, M ~ T Chemicals) at 0.2 wt-% tin catalyst based on the solids content of the coating formulation (mercaptan:tin equivalent ratio of 48:1). 80 g. aliquots of the master batch were blended 35 with the various tin/mercaptan complexes and the viscosity measured at various time intervals thereafter (~2 spindle at 60 rpm). In other tests, it has been determined that at the level of tin catalyst used, the pot life of *Trade-mark . ~
'..~

~303015 this formulation with tin catalyst only (no mercaptan) would be much less than 1 hour and typically on the order of 10-20 minutes. The following results were recorded.

4497-147 Series Viscosity (cps)~
Mercaptan 0 h. 3 h. 5 h.7 h.22 h.55 h.
10 Uncatalyzed 46 48 49 53 63 130 TrimethylolpropaneTri-(3-mercaptopropionate) 46 52 5q 58 AG G
Pentaerythritol tetra-(3-mercaptopropionate)lPTM~ 48 53 59 61 G
15 Glycol di-(3-mercaptopropionate)[GDP] 45 52 60 64 G
Glycol di~3-mercaptoacetate) lGDA~ 45 52 57 58 G
Trimethylolpropane 20 Trithioglycolate 45 56 61 62 G
Mercaptodiethylether 45 49 53 sa 77 G
Ethanedithiol 4'~ 52 63 68 G
Thiolsct~c Acid 52 127 425 G
Mercaptopropionic acid 50 94 158222 G
25 Thiophenol 44 52 54 57 96 G
Thioacetic 70 AG G
2-Mercsptoethanol 46 48 52 52 63 133 GDP + Acetic Acid 51 B2 71 78 G
~AG = Almost GelledG = Gelled The above-tabulated data demonstrate that a wide variety of mercaptans successfully complex with tin catalysts. It is noted that carboxyl functionality appears to shorten the pot life of the formulation.
EXAMPLE n Various tin catalysts were complexed with GDP (see Example 1) and evaluated with a master formulation of DESMOPHEN B00 polyol (a polyester polyol, 100% nv solids, OH number 290, Mobay Chemical Co., 55.8 g), 40 DESMODUR* N3390 polyisocyanate (43.2 g), methyl amyl ketonelbutyl _1~_ *Trade-mar k .

, ,,, ~ '''-:: `'' ~ ' acetate solvent (MAK/BAc = 1/2 volume ratio, 20 g). To each of seversl lots of this master formulation was added the following:

Formulation No. Additive (g) _ _ _ 4497-84A Control DESMOPHEN 800 (2.6) 4497-84B Control GDP (1.6) 4497-85A 10% Dibutyl tin acetate in GDP (1.76) 4497-85B 10% Dibutyl .in oxide in GDP (1.76) 4497-86B Dibutyl tin dilaurate ~1)/
t9)/MAK (5)/GDP (2.64) Viscosity measurements were taken (as described in Example I) with the following results being recorded.

Time (cps) Form No. Init. 4 hrs. 21 hrs.
4497-84A 80 87 169 (24 hrs) 4497-84B 75 80 154 (24 hrs) These results demonstrate that various forms of tin catalysts can have their cahlytic activity delayed by complexing with a mercaptan. Note that Formul~tion No. 4497-86A (not reported above) containing 10% Sn(II) octoate in GDP (1.76 g) evidenced Q white precipitate which dissolved and an exotherm was noted. This formulation thickened slightly but did not gel.
No sttempt was made to confirm this run and it is reported here for completeness.
Each of the formulations was sprayed onto glass by the vapor injection spray process of U.S. Pat. No. 4,517,222 using 0.5 wt-% dimethylethanol amine (DMEOLA) catalyst followed by a post-cure thermal bake for S
minutes at 82.2C (180F). Neither control Formulation 84A or 84B was tack free following the post-cure thermal bake. Formulations 85A, 85B, and 86B all were tack free following the post-cure thermal bake, indicating that the amine catalyst had activated the tin cahlyst. The basic formulation (polyester polyol and polyisocyanate) results in a soft cured film so that . ;,, :

1~030iS
per~ormance properties (MEK rubs, pencil hardness, etc.) are not important.
Of importance is the ability to delay the catalytic activity of tin catalysts and to activate their activity readily and on demand with the amine activator.
S
EXAMPLE m The effect of tin concentration (tin supplied from a tin/mercaptan complex) in a polyol/polyisocyanate formulation was investig~ted both as to pot life (viscosity) and performance of the cured coating (MEK rubs). The 10 following formulations were made.

Formulation No. (g) Ingredient 4497-106* 4497-105B 4497-105A 4497-104B 4497-104A
DESMOPHEN 800 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 DESMODUR N3390 44.5 43.8 43.1 41.6 38.7 MAK/BAc Solvent (1:2 vol. ratio) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Tin/Mercaptfln* *
Complex -- 0.66 1.32 2.64 5.28 % Catalyst (on solids) -- 0.057 0.115 0.23 0.46 NCO/OH (SH) = 1.1 _ ~" ~only MAK solvent **Dibutyl tin dilaurate (lg)/GDP (9 g)/MAK (5 g) The following viscosity data was reported (~2 spindle, 60 rpm).

13030~5 TABLE S
Viscosity (cps) ~ Increase Formulation Init6 hr. 24 hr. at 6 hr.
. _ . . ~
5 4497-106 75 82 147 9.3 4497-lOSB 72 93 G 29.2 4497-105A 73 96 G 31.5 4497-104B 68 88 G 29.4 10 4497-104A 63 99 G 57.1 The above-tabulated data demons~rates that the level of tin catalyst does affect pot life, but not that substantially at 6 hours for the formulation tested. At the tin levels tested sprayable viscosity was maintained for in lS excess of 6 hours (about 1 shift).
Each of the coatings was vapor in3ection cure sprayed onto glass as in Example II with 0.5 wt-% DMEOLA catalyst. The following performance data was recorded.

-ao-A

~3030~15 ¢ ~ I g m O ~D m eL, m ~ I _ m oO ~ m ~ c ~ ~ I ~ m g ~ m m ~ ¦ u, m O ~ m _ cô
o Z

~o ~ I 0, m O ~ m m ~ I ~OD m O o m ~ ~ I ~ m O o m o~
m ~ I ~ m O c~ m ,~, 0~ ¦ tD m O 'D m 4 ~, m I l I I O co m ~ ~

¢ I l I I _ 00 ~ o~ ~

m I l I I o ~ ~m o q~ 0 ~ 0 0 ~,~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~303015 .
O¢ ~

m o~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ , _, ¢ D~ D~ ~ o m ~ ~ ~

I I ~ C

0 c~ t4 E ~
o m ~ ~ c 0 e I ¢ t~ e ~, o O

¢ m P~ ~ s ~ ~ ~7 0 Co o o I I E E ~ ô a 5 0 ~3 ¢ t~ ~ c ~~V 5 ~

l e ~ c. 3 8__ 3 8 3 ~

m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a>
o 2 0 0 0 ~
O ~ I ~ C~cl^
~r ~ ~ ~
11~ N ~ ~
E~ 5: P: ~C * *

The above-tabulated data again demonstrates that an amine activator will activate the tin ;n a tin/mercaptan catalyst for effecting cure of a polyol/polyisocyanate coating composition. This data also demonstrates that cure of the coating is accelerated by increased levels of tin catalyst up 5 to a point. This trend can be seen from Figs. I and 2 which graphically portray the 6 hour viscosity change and 1 hour MEK Rubs, respectively, versus tin concentration.
A sample of 104A was sprayed onto glass using only compressed air (no amine) and then subjected to heating at 82.2F for 5 minutes (HT-I). The 10 film was tacky. Another sample of 104A was an air sprayed onto glass (no amine) and then subjected to heating at 121.1C for S minutes (~T-2). This film was tack free. Performance data on each sample was taken 1 day after application and heating.

Formulation 104A
Air Spray Amine Spray Test HT-l HT-2 HT-l HT-2 MEK Rubs 62 75 100+ 100+
This data shows that the tin/mercaptan complex in combination with an amine catalyst is synergistic for cure of the coating as the 82.2/5 Min.
data c1early demonstrates. In fact, even though the coating can be thermally cured, the inventive catalyst system still catalyzed the mixture.
EXAMPLE IV
The efféct of tin concentration on a coating containing a very flexible polyester polyol was studied for the dibutyl tin dilaurate catalyst.

~303015 Formulation No. (~) Ingredient4497-llOA 4497-109B 4497-109A 4497-108B ,4497-108A
K-FLEX* 41.7 40.9 40.238.9 - 35.0 DESMODUR 42.1 42.1 42.142.1 42.1 Tin/~* --- 0.57 1.142.28 5.71 GDP Complex MAK/BAc 27 27 27 27 27 (1:2) 96 Catalyst 0 0.05 0.100.20 0.50 Solids* * *
NCO/OH (SH) = 1.1/1.0 * K-FLEX 188 flexible polyester polyol, 10096 nv, OH. No. 235, King Industries * *See Table 4, Example Ill 20 ***wt-% dibutyltin dilaurate on solids Viscosity dats was recorded as follows:

Viscoslty (cps) Formulatlon Init. 4 Hr.
l lOA ~2 G
lO9B 61 G
lO9A 57 G

A short pot life is a characteristic of the resin of the formulation as they all gelled within 4 hours.
Cure data was collected as described in Example III, Table 6.

13030~15 O I ' ~ ~ ~ m m ~ I ~ o c~ m O -- ~D

¢ I I I ~1~ m ~ G ~

_ m ~ , m I I IOD~Dml I I

m I I I o ~ m ~ c _ I I I co o m I I I I

m I I I o ~ P:

_ I I ¦ 00 N m ~ c~

~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ o o O C
5 Z a: x 130~01S
¢ ~ o m ~o o m m ~ ~ m ~ tD m ¢ ~ N ~ r~ N m ~ Q~
~ _ ~r :~ m ~ u~ m o ~ m ~

e ¢ ~ u~ N m o _ E!. m ~ ~o m O o m ~

r ¢ ~ ~ m O ~ m m ~ m u~ N m _ Z v X N ~ ~n ._ ~" ~ y ~ ._ O ~ O C

The formulation without catalyst will not cure until heated at t21.1C
for 5 minutes. Yet with the inventive catalyst system, cure is evident with heating at sa.20c for S minutes. This can be seen by reîerence to Fig. 3 which graphically portrays the 1 Hr. MEK rub data set forth above.
S

EXAMPLE V
Tests were conducted on a slow curing acrylic polyol with and without the use of a mercaptan in order to demonstrate the effect of the complex and amine. A master batch formulation was made as follows.
TABI.E 11 Ingredient Weight (g) JONCRYL*500 (acrylic polyol 167 809~ n.v. solids, OH no. 112, S.C. Johnson ~c Son, Inc.) BAc 40 Portions Or the master batch were used wlth different dibutyltin dilaurate catalyist levels as follows:

*Trade-mark ~ir 13030~5 % T-12 Brand Test No. Type* Weight(g) on Solids J l-J8None-Control -- F --Rl-K8 5% T-12 in MAKlBAc 0.82 0.02 (1:1 by wt.) K9-K16 5% T-12 in MAR/BAc 1.64 û.04 (1:1 by wt.) K17-K24 5% T-12 in MAK/BAc 3.28 0.08 (1:1 by wt.) Ll-L8 T-12/GDP/MAI~/BAc 1.24 0.02 (lgl9g/lOg/lOg) L9-L16 T-12/GDP/MAK/BAc 2.48 0.04 (lg/9g/lOg/lOg) L-17-L24 T-12/GDP/MAR/BAc 4.97 0.08 (lg/9g/lOg/lOg~

*T-12 brsnd dibutyltin dilaurate, see Example I
T-12/GDP/MAK, see Example II
All formuistions were sprQyed under the following conditions:

AIR-RT: Coating sprayed with air (no amine) and dried at ambient indoor room temperature VIC-RT: Coating sprayed with DMEOLA catalyst in accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 4,517,a22 and dried at ambient indoor room temperature (VIC is a registered trademsrk of Ashland Oil Co.) AIR-HTl: Coating sprayed with air (no amine) and then baked at 65.5C (150F) for 10 minutes AIR-HT2: Coating sprayed with air (no amine) and then baked at 82.2C (180F) for 10 minutes AIR-HT3: Coating sprayed with air (no amine) and then baked at 98.8~ (210F) for 10 minutes VIC-HTl: Coating sprayed with DMEOLA cats1yst as in VIC-RT and then baked st 65.5C (150F) for 10 minutes VIC-HT2: Coating sprayed with DMEOLA catalyst ss in VIC-RT snd then baked at 82.2C (180F) for 10 minutes 13~3~15 VIC-HT3: Coating sprayed with DMEoiA catalyst as in VIC-RT and then baked at g8.8C ~210F) for 10 minutes In one series of tests (Kl-K24) the formulations contained dibutyltin 5 dilaurate catalyst (T-12 brand) and no mercaptan resin. In the iecond series of tests (Ll-L24) the formulations contained the tin mercaptan complex of Table 4, Example rlI. Catalyst levels included 0%, 0.0296, 0.04%, and 0.08%
(all percentages by weight).
Pot life data was recorded as well as MEK rub data at the following time intervals following application: 5 minutes, 1 hour, 4 hours, and 24 hours. The coatings also were tested for being tack free and the time recorded. A control series (Jl-J8) with no tin catalyst, no mercaptan, and no amine also was run for completeness.

....
MEK RUBS~*
Tack~ Pot Test SprayFree Life Time After Application No. Mode (hr) (hr15 min. 1 Hr. Hrs. 24 Hrs.
Control Jl AIR-RT ~ 24 ~
J2 VIC-RT ~ 24 -- -- -- -- --J3 AIR-HTl~ 24 J4 AIR-HT2> 24 J7 VIC-HT "24 J5 AIR-HT3,~24 -- -- --J8 VIC-HT3 >24 0.02% Catal~st Kl AIR-RT ~ 4 0.75 -- -- 20 Ll AIR-RT ~ 4 3 -- -- -- 12 K2 VIC-RT >4 0.75 -- -- -- 25 L2 VIC-RT ~ 4 3 -- -- -- 20 K3 AIR-HTl 24 0.75 -- -- -- 35 L3 AIR-HTl i4 3 -- -- -- 15 KB VIC-HTl ~ 4 0.75 -- -- -- 30 L6 VIC-HTl ~ 4 3 -- -- -- 30 K4 AIR-HT ~4 0.75 -- 3 25 45 K7 VIC-HT2 TFO 0.75 2 8 40 70 L7 VIC-HT25-10 min. 3 1 8 8 45 K5 AIR-HT3 TFO 0.75 5 18 55 60 L5 AIR-HT320 min. 3 4 7 15 25 K8 VIC-HT3 TFO 0.75 10 30 80 80 TABLE 14 (continued) MEK RUBS**
Tack~ POt Test Spray Free Life Time Afte Application No. Mode (hr) (hr) 5 min. 1 Hr. 4_Hrs. 24 Hrs 0.04% Catalyst K9 AIR-RT .>4 0.5 -- T T 30 L9 AIR-RT ~4 3.5 -- -- -- 20 10 K10 VIC-RT ~4 0.5 -- T T 40 L10 YIC-RT ~ 4 3.5 -- -- -- 30 Xll AIR-HTl ~ 4 0.5 -- 3 20 50 Lll AIR-HTl >4 3.5 -- -- -- 20 15 K14 VIC-HTI ~ I 0.5 -- 2 30 50 L14 VIC-HTI 0.75 3.5 -- 2 10 45 - K12 AIR-HT2 ~ 1 0.5 8 15 34 45 L12 AIR-HT2 0.75 3.5 -- 2 8 35 20 K15 VIC-HT2 TFO 0.5 12 20 70 60 L15 VIC-HT2 TFO 3.5 12 20 20 45 K13 AIR-HT3 TFO 0.5 15 40 65 80 L13 AIR-HT3 T~O 3.5 10 10 26 50 25 K16 VIC-HT3 TFO 0.5 25 45 75 75 L16 VIC-HT3 TFO 3.5 30 40 50 60 0.0896 Catalvst K17 AIR-RT ~4 0.25 -- -- 5 30 30 L17 AIR-RT ~ 4 4 -- -- 2 40 K18 VIC-RT L 4 0.25 -- -- 5 35 L18 VIC-RT ~ 4 4 -- -- 7 40 13030~5 TABLE 14 ~continu~d) MEK RUBSt*
Tack* Pot Test Spray Free Life Time After Application No Mode(hr) (hr)S min. 1 Hr. 4 Hrs. 24 Hrs - L
Kl9 AIR-HTlTFO 0.25 4 10 25` 45 Ll9 AIR-HTl~ 4 4 -- -- -- 45 K22 VIC-HTlTFO 0.25 6 12 20 55 10 L22 VIC-HTl0.5 4 -- 515 40 K20 AIR-HT2TFO 0.25 25 ao 55 70 L20 AIR-HT2~ 4 4 -- -- 5 SS
K23 VIC-HT2TFO 0.2S 20 32 58 110 15 L23 VIC-~T2TFO 4 12 20 25 50 K21 AIR-HT3TFO 0.25 65 90 100 130 K24 VIC-HT3TFO 0.25 40 8D 85 100 ~TFO means that the film was tack free from the oven (sample cooled before testing) ~*T means that the film was tacky It will be apparent that the particular formulation chosen is a slow curing composition and that the tin levels studied were too low for good performance to be realized from the formulation. The data, however, is quite convincing that the pot life can be extended when the complex is used 30 and that substantially equivalent performance (both Tack Free test and MEK
Rub test) is realized at eguivalent dibutyltin dilaurate levels and heating conditions when using only the tin catalyst and when using the tin/mercaptan complex. This performance equivalence can be seen in Figs.
4~ which graphically portray 1 hour MEK Rub data and pot liie data versus 35 catalyst concentration with and without mercaptan for each of the heating conditions tested.

EXAMPLE Vl An advantageous embodiment of the present invention involves the use 40 of a resin which contains both hydroxyl functionality and mercapto functionality. The addition of a tin catalyst results in a unique delayed-, , ,.

13030iS

action, self-catalyzed resin which can be added to a polyisocyanate to make a unique urethan~forming coating composition. Synthesis of such a resin is not routine and preferably is conducted in accordance with the Dammann synthesis as disclosed in commonly-assigned application Serial No. 919,076,-5 U.S. Patent ~lo, 4,t3~,945, This synthesis involves the formation of a glycidyl-functional polyol (e.g.
acrylic polyol) in a first stage fol}owed by the addition of mercapto-compound containing carboxyl or other functionality reactive with the glycidyl groups of the first stage reaction product.
The ~ollowing ingredients were used:

Resin 4497-163 Part A Wei~ht Parts 15 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 180 Part B
Butyl acrylate (3 moles) 384 Glycidyl methacrylate (0.3 moles) 42.6 20 Hydroxyethyl methscrylate (I mole) 130 Part C
Di-t-butyl peroxide 5.4 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 50 Part D
Mercaptopropionic scid (0.25 mole) 26.5 The procedure utilized involved heating Part A to 165C and adding 10 wt-%
30 of Part C, and 80 wt-% of Part C and Part B over a one hour period. This mixture was held for 15 minutes and 5 wt-% of Part C was added. This mixture was held for another 1 hour followed by the addition of 5 wt-~ of Part C. This mixture was held for 2 hours to produce a glycidyl-functional acrylic polyol. The reaction mixture then was cooled to 150C, Part D was 35 added, and the reaction mixture held for one hour to produce a resin which analyzed as follows.

,, ,.~", '.' 13()30~S

Resin 4497-163 Non-volatiles 70.4 wt-%
OH No. 95 Acid No 7.5 Water 0.35 wt-%
Viscosity 5.7 Stokes Gardner Color 1-Density 8.82 Ib/gal Molecular Number Average 2860 Molecular Weight Average 10,000 SH 16.7 wt-%
Secondary OH 16.7 wt-%
Primary OH 66.6 wt-%

One control formulation and one inventive formulation were 20 comPounded as follows:

Number In~redient Amount (wt-parts) Control 4497-173A Resin 4497-163 64.1 Desmodur N3390 25.8 MAK/BAc 25.0 Inventive 4497-172A Resin 4497-163 64.1 Desmodur N3390 25.8 MAK/BAc 25.0 Dibutyltin dilaurate solution* 0.68 SH:Sn = 268:1 ~10% dibutyltin dilaurate (T-12 brsnd) in ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate, 0.1 wt%
catalyst based on non-volatile solids Each formulation was tested for po;!~e and then was sprayed onto gl~ss panels with DMEOLA catalyst QS in the pre~ious examples.

~o. 3 Hr. % Visc. Increase 173A-no Tin 24 172A-with Tin 27 TABLE 18B~
RT-l RT-3** HT-I
Test 173A 172A 173A 172A 173A 172A
TFH -- -- ~ -- N Y
Tack Free 60 60 (min) 1 hr. MEK -- 6 -- -- -- 14 lhr. Pencil-- 6B -- -- H

Sward 10,10 16,1B 10,14 18,18 8,10 22,20 Pencil HB H HB H B H
*See Table 6, Ex~mple In *sRT-3 is for a panel held at room temperature for 72 hours.
The above-tabulated data demonstrates that a multi-functional resin can be designed and synthesized. Performance of the resin was not optimized in this example 8S the curing chemistry was of prime interest.
The curing chemistry was confirmed, viz. that a single resin can bear 30 hydroxyl functionality and mercaptan functionality for complexing with the tin catalyst.

EXAMPLE VII
An acrylic polyol, 4431-160, was prepared from hydroxyethyl acrylate 35 (1.5m), butyl methacrylate (2.0m) and butyl acrylate (l.Om) using di-t-butyl peroxide catslyst and ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate solvent: OH no. 104, acid number 1.87, 71.7 wt-% n.v. solids, 0.1% H2O, Gardner color 1-, Stokes viscosity 10.1 cps, density 8~81 Ib/gal, and equivalent weight 539.4. A white urethane-forming topcoat paint was formulsted in conventional fashion (e.g.
40 ball milling, etc.) as follows:

~303015 Paint 4431-166 In~redient Wt-Parts Part A
Ball Mill Polyol 4431-160 150.0 DuPont R-960 TiO2 pigment 500.0 Butyl acetate 200.0 CAB-551-0.2 cellulose acetate butyrate 10.5 (Eastman Chemicals) Letdown Polyol 4431-160 350 0 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 50.0 Tinuvin 328'1ight stabilizer (hydroxy phenyl 4.0 benzotriazole based stabilizer, Ciba-Gigy Co.) Byk 300~mar aid (silicone resin, Byk Chemie) 0.5 Irganox 1010 anti-oxidant (hlndered phenol type, 0.4 Ciba-Glgy Co.) Part B
Desmodur N3390 polyisocyanate 23.1 Butyl acetate 10.0 .~
Several conYentiona; tin mercaptide catalysts were tested along with the inventive tin/mercaptan complex catalyst. Excess mercaptan was used with the conventional tin mercaptide catalyst~ in order to demonstrate this embodiment of the invention.

*Trade-mark h - ~ `.. ,.... - i ....

~30301S

SH/ rin Catsl~st No._ _InFredients Amt (~ Mole Ratio 4431-175A Dibutyltin dilaur~te 1 48:1 GDP g Butylacetate 20 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 10 4431-175B Dibutyltin dilaurate 1 N/A
Butylacetate 29 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 10 4431-175C T-125 tin mercapt;de 1.09 5.6:1 (M ~c T Chemicals) GDP
Butylacetate 28 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 10 4431-175D T-125 tin mercsptide 1.09 N/A
Butylacetate 29 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 10 4431-175E T-131 tin mercaptide 1.03 5.6:1 GDP
Butylacetate 28 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 10 4431-175F T-131 tin mercaptide 1.03 N/A
Butylacetate 29 Ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate 10 Complete cstalyzed paint formulations based on Paint 4431-166 snd the foregoing cstalyst solutions were prepared as follows:

:

~ , .

TABLE 21 *
Catalyzed Paint Ingredient Wei~t (g) 4431-177A Paint 4431-166 Part A 136.5 S Paint 4431-166 Part B 33.1 EEP/BuAc (1:1 by wt)*~ 7.5 4431-177B Paint 4431-166 Part A 136.5 Paint 4431-166 Part B 33.1 Catalyst No. 175A 1.5 EEP/BuAc 6.0 4431-177C Paint 4431-166 Psrt A 136.5 Paint 4431-166 Part B 33.1 lS Catalyst No. 175B 1.5 EEP/BuAc 6.0 4431-181A Paint 4431-166 Part A 136.5 Paint 4431-166 Part B 33.1 Catalyst No. 175C 1.5 EEP/BuAc 6.0 4431-181B Paint 4431-lB6 Part A 136.5 Paint 4431-166 Part B 33.1 CatalystNo. 175D 1.5 EEP/BuAc 6.0 4431-19lA Paint 4431-166 Part A 136.5 Paint 4431-166 Part B 33.1 Catalyst No. 175E 1.5 EEP/8uAc 6.0 4431-19lB Paint 4431-166 Part A 136.5 Paint 4431-166 Part B 33.1 Catalyst No. 175F 1.5 EEP/BuAc 6.0 ~6 drops of a 25 wt-% FC-430 solution in MEK added to all paints, FC-430 surfactant being a non-ionic fluorocarbon sur~actant, Minnesota M~ning *Trade-mark .,.~.

.

Manu~actul ing Company, St. Paul, Minnesota **EEP is ethyl 3-ethoxypropionate BuAc is butylacetate The pot life data on the above-tabulated catalyzed p~ints was recorded as follows:

Viscosity (cps)l Catalyzed 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 24 Paint Init hr hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs hrs 4431-177A 56 56 56 _ 56 56 59 59 69 4431-177B 56 56 59 -- 59 59 64 61 Gel 4431-177C 56 Gel2-- ~
4431-181A 61 68 121 Gel 4431-181B 67 Gel3-- -- -- -- -- -- --4431-19lA 56 57 68 112 Gel -- -- -- -4431-19lB 56 71 176 Gel4 -- -- -- -- --1 ~3 spindle at 30 rpm 2 100 cps at 45 min; Gel at 1 hour 3 Gel at 30 min.

4 Gel at 2 hr. 40 min.

This data clearly demonstrates that the inventive Sn/SH catalyzed paint, 4431-177B, retained excellent pot life of the paint 4431-177A, without catalyst, while the paint containing the tin catalyst only, 4431-177C, had a very short pot life. Addition of excess mercaptan to the T-125 brand tin mercaptide catalyzed paint resulted in about a two-fold increase in pot life (compare Paints 4431-181A and 4431-181B). Addition of excess mercaptan to the T-131 brand tin mercaptide catalyzed paint resulted in about a 2-fold increase in pot life (compare Paints 4431-19lA and 4431-191B). With even a greater excess of mercaptan added in Paint 4431-19lA, likely even longer pot lives should be attainable. Nevertheless, the unique ability to increase the pot life of tin mercaptide catalyzed paints is demonstrated.
Cure response data for each of the catalyzed paints was determined by air spraying and VIC spraying with 0.5 wt-% DMEOLA catalyst at 50 psi followed by tempering at room temperature for 2 minutes followed by heating at 82.2C (180F) ior 5 minutes (see Table 11, Example V). The following data was recorded.

o o o o 130301S
8 ~

~ 1.~ -- ~ ~ U~ O O O O o ~, o C C
¢ ~ ~

"~ o ", o ~ Z ~

1~ ~ a u,~^+ O _ O ~ Z ~ ~ ~ o O O

.~ O O~ ,~, C
_ 0 e~ ~ O ~o s~

--E

_ I J ~ Z D D "~ _ _ L
C~ C

E C L
E ~ ~, 0 0 e ~ 0 ~ ~ o :- u~ ~ _ ~;~030~S

TABLE 23 (continued) Catalyzed Paint Test 191A 191B
AIR VIC AIR_ VIC ~_ TFO N Y N Y
Sl. Tacky Almost Sl. Tacky Almost Sward (at 5 min) 1,2 3,3 2,2 3,3 Sward (at 1 hr) 3,3 4,4 3,3 5,4 Sward (at 24 hrs) 9,11 14,12 9,9 14,14 MEK Rubs(at 5 min) 95 100~ 100+ 100+
Soft Softens Soft Softens MEK Rubs (at I hr) 100+ 100+ 100+ 100+
Softens Softens Softens Softens MEK Rubs (at 24 hrs) 100+ 100+ 100+ 100+

Catalyzed Paint 177B with the inventive tin/mercaptan complex performed equivalent to Catalyzed Paint 177C (which had tin catalyst but no mercaptan), but had a much longer pot life. The presence of mercaptan in comparative Catalyzed Paints 181A and 191A with tin mercaptide catalysts increased the pot life over Catalyzed Paints 181B and l91B which had no mercaptan, while the cure response was promoted by the amine activator. Thus, the uniqueness of the tin/mercaptan complex with its fast cure response in the presence of amine and its extended pot life is established.
With respect to the coatings which were air sprayed and then baked, it will be observed that the Inactivated tin catalyst complex also was released for providing cure of the applied paints. The heating schedule, YiZ. 82.2C
for 5 minutes, is less severe than is required for uncatalyzed equivalent paints. For example, in order to get the degree of cure for the low bake, air sprayed paints as represented in Table 23, equivalent uncatalyzed paints would have to be baked at about 121.1C (250F) for about 20 minutes.
Thus, it will be observed thst heat also establishes fast cure response of the tin/mercaptan complexes of the present invention.
EXAMPLE VIII
The flexibility of the inventive tin/mercaptan catalyst complex is apparent by its ready adaptability for use in present commercial two-pack urethane coatings which are transformed into long pot life formulations. ln 13030~5 . . .
this example, IMRON 817U coating was evaluated (IMRON coating being a 2-pack urethane white automobile refinish topcoat, E.I. DuPont de Nemeurs and Co.). The formulations were compounded as follows:
S
TABI,E 24 Formulation No. In~redient~ - Wt-Parts Control 10 4574-44B IMRON 817U Part A 82.5 IMRON 192S Activator 27.5 IMRON 189S Accelerator 3.4 Comparative Tin IMRON 817U Part A 82.5 15 4574-44C IMRON 192S Activator 27.5 5% dibutyltin dilaurate 0.44 in EEP
Inventive 4574-44A IMRON 817U Part 82.5 IMRON 192S Activator 27.5 Dibutyltin dilaurate (lg)/ 0.66 GDP (9g)/MAX (lOg)/BAc (lOg) Inventive IMRON 817U Part A 82.5 4599-155E IMRON 192S Activator 27.5 IMRON 189S Accelerator (30 g)/ 3.85 GDP (4 ~
* Part A is the polyol and the activator is the polyisocyanate. The 189S
accelerator was analyzed to be greater than 99% 2,4-pentanedione.
The solids content (0.39%) was found to be composed of 9.8% tin and 1.9% zinc. The overall calculated tin and zinc levels in 189S
accelerator are 0.04% tin and 0.007% zinc. For comparison, the tin content of the catalyst solution used in 4574-44A ;s about 0.696 tin.

The following viscosity data was recorded:

13030~5 Formulation Viscosity (cps) No. Init lhr 4hrs 8hrs 24hrs30 hrs 48 hrs Control 38 46 47 53 720 ~el ---Tin 45 Gel at 90 min ~
Inventive 44A 43 44 53 53 69 240 ~ Gel Inventive 155E 35 35 35 -- 35 -- 50 . _ .. . . _ . .

The above-tabulated data demonstrates the improvement in pot life achieved by the novel tin/mercapto catalyst complex compared to a tin catalyzed formulation and to a tin/ketone catalyst complex. Also 15 demonstrated is the greater affinity which tin has for mercaptans than for ketone chelating agents. This data is signifi~ant since it was generated using a conventional commercial paint formulation.
Each of the five formulations was sprayed onto glass with 0.5 wt.-%
DMEOLA catalyst and then heated at 82.2C (180F) for 5 minutes. The 20 control, tested 5 minutes after the bake, passed 120 MEK double rubs while inventive formulation 44A tested at 200 MEK double rubs. The formulation with tin catalyst only (no mercaptan) also possessed 200 MEK double rubs.
All five coatings passed 200 MEX double rubs I hour after the bake.
Inventive formulation 155E was not tested after 5 minutes. The unique 25 balance of extended pot life and cure-on-demand is demonstrated by the foregoing data.

EXAMPLE IX
Additional testing was done to establish relationships between tin 30 catalyst concentration and tin/mercaptan ratios for two different mercaptans: glycol di(3-mercaptopropionate), GDP; and 2-mercaptoethanol, MCE. The basic composition was formulated from TONE 0305 polycaprolactone triol (100~i n.v. solids, OH no. 310, Union Carbide Corporation, 258 weight parts), DESMODUR N3390 isocyanate (360 wt parts), and MAK/BAc (1:2 vol. ratio) solvent (231 wt parts).
Dibutyltin dilaurate catalyst was varied from 0.05 wt-% to 0.10 wt-%
while the tin/mercaptan weight ratio varied from 1:15 to 1:45. Each formulation was sprayed with 0.5 wt-% DMEOLA catalyst onto glass, heated at 82.2C (180F) for 5 minutes, and then tested. The following data was 40 recorded.

13~301S

Formula- Viscosity- MEK
tion Mercaptan SN/SH Catalyst 4 Hr Rubs No. _TyPe Ratio Level TFO (%chan~e) 1 Hr_ 1 GDP 1:15 0.05 Y 19 23 2 GDP 1:15 0.10 Y 17 26 3 GDP 1:45 0.05 N 2- 9 4 GDP 1:45 0.10 Almost 0 18 MCE 1:15 0.05 N 69 30 6 MCE 1:15 0.10 Y 60 40 7 MCE 1:45 0.05 N 10 14 8 MCE 1:45 0.10 Y 10 51 . _ . _ . .

The above-tabulated data shows the subtleties of the invention in several respects. For GDP, it appears that the Sn/SH ratio should be less than 1:45 at the practical levels of tin catalyst tested. At the lower Sn/SH
ratio of 1:15, there is no apparent benefit in increasing the tin catalyst levels to above 0.05 wt-%. For MCE, however, the coatings were not tack free from the oven ~TPO) at the lower tin catalyst level, but were at the higher tin leveL Overall, GDP appeared to be slightly better than MCE in the system evaluated.

EXAMPLE X
Gel data using liquid primary and secondary amines was generated in order to demonstrate the operability of primary and secondary amines. The master batch formulation used is set forth below.

TABLE ?7 In~redient Amount (~) Tone 0305 Polyol (See Example I) 78 DESMODUR N3390 Isocyanate 102 (See Example 1) MAK/BuAc (1/2 voL ratio) 31 (See Example n) Dibutyltin dilaurate (lg)/ 5.1 GDP (9~)/MAK (5~) Samples (17g) of the master batch were combined with 3g. at 10 wt-%
solution of amine and the gel times recorded.

~303015 Amine Type Gel Time and Solvent __ (min.) Control-no amine ~20 Dimethylethanol am;ne in MAK/BuAc -9 (1:2 wt ratio) 2-Amino-2-methylpropsnol in ~ 146 MAK/BuAc (1:2) Di-N-butyl amine in toluene 254 Diethanol amine 322 These results show that primary and secondary amines function as activators in the process to release the stabilized inactivated tin (or bismuth) catalyst for the released (active) catalyst to catalyze the cure of the coating composition. These results also show that primary and secondary amines do not function as well as do the preferred tertiary amines. Several other primary and secondary amines were tested. Data is not available for these amines since they and the Control gelled overnight.

EXAMPLE Xl A bismuth/mercaptan catalyst complex was prepared by mixing 0.62 g of Coscat 83 bismuth catalyst (bismuthyl bls-neodecanoate catalyst supplied by Cosan Chemical Corp., Carlstadt, N.J.), 2.04 g of GDP, and 7.34 g of N-methylpyrrolidone solvent. A coating composition was formulated from Joncryl 500 acrylic polyol (236 g), MAK/BAc solvent (1/2 volume ratio), and the bismuth/mercaptan complex (3.0 g). An equivalent formulation with the bismuth catalyst uncomplexed (i.e. no mercaptan) had a pot life of less than 10 minutes, while the inventive formulation with the bismuth/mercaptan catalyst complex had a pot life of greater than 4 hours (over a twenty-fold increase in pot life).
The inventive formulation was divided into lots which were air sprayed with and without DMEOLA catalyst followed by either baking at 82.2C or standing at indoor ambient temperature. MEK rub resistance data recorded is set forth below.

13030i5 Formulation Post Application MEK RUBS
No. 4599-20 Treatment 1 Hr. 24 Hrs.
Air Spray r Ambient 9 200 82.2 C 109 200 DMEOLA Sprav Ambient 116 200 82.2 C 200 200 The foregoing data demonstrates that bismuth catalysts can be complexed for improving the pot life of polyol/polyisocyanate coatings.
This data also demonstrates that the bismuth/mercaptan catalyst complex is activated by an amine catalyst as well as is thermally activated.

EXAMPLE XII
Various phenolic materials were evaluated for their ability to complex with tin and bismuth catalysts as follows:

~n~

-1 lo I
Dl lo I
~r~D o I I I I _ I I I o~
lol I 1 1 1 1 lo~l~

~;a I I O I O

l 8 ¦ " I I I I I I I

~ o I I o I I I I I

C _ OIIIIII _ 8 ~ S

. ..~
TABLE 30 (cont'd) Catalyst Formulation No. ~g) Ingredient 4599 Series A(65/6) B(B5/8) C(2/6) D(50) _ T-12 Tin Catalyst ~ -- -- --Coscat 83 Bismuth Catalyst 0.62 0.62 0.62 - 0.62 Catechol 0.47 -- -- --Paramethoxy phenol -- 0.53 Methyl-2,4-Dihydroxybenzoate 3-Methoxy catechol 5-Methoxy resorc;nol Methyl-3,5-dihydroxybenzoate Pyrogallol - -- 0.50 MAK/BAc ~1/2 volume ratio)_ 8.93 8.85 8.88 __ 9.38 The coatings formulations for each catalyst series is set forth below.

In~redient Series Series Series . _ Tone 0305 Polyol 255 151 255 Desmodur N3390 Polyisocyanate 336 199 336 MAK/BAc (1/2 volume ratio) 228 135 228 Catalyst 2.04 10 drops/ 15 drops/
20~ samples 20R~ samples The 4574-131 series was tested for pot life and for cure response by spraying with DMEOLA catalyst followed by baking at 82.2C for 10 minutes. The 4574-46 series was tested for pot life in one ounce bottles neat or with 5 drops of liquid DMEOLA. The 4599 series were tested for pot 35 life in 20 oz. bottles neat. With 8 drops of liquid DMEOLA added to duplicate samples, 2 mil films of the 4599 series were drawn down, baked at 82.2C for S minutes, and MEK rub data generated. The following data was recorded.

~303015 Catalyst MEK
4574-131 Series GelTime Rubs .
S A ~24 hrs wet fi~En E ~ 3 hrs 200 F IS min.
G ~3hrs 160 H 15 min .

Catalyst Gel Time (Minutes) 4_74-46 Series llo Amine Amine IS A a 2 B ~ S00 43 _D 23 _ 8 __ Catalyst MEK
4599 Series _ Gel Time _Rubs_ A ~4 hrs ~ 200 B ~ I hr ~200 C ~4 hrs 100 D ~ 1 hr ~200 The following pot life data can be appreciated when it is realized that equivalent amounts of uncomplexed tin or bismuth catalysts provide a pot life (gel time) of less than lS minutes. Thus, only the phenolic materials 35 with adjacent (e.g.a-,~-) hydroxyl groups (e.g. catechol, 3-methoxy catechol, and wrogallol) successfully complex wlth tin and bismuth catalysts, and yet release the catalyst in the presence of amine or heat.
However, it is believed that some non-ad~acent hydroxyl group compounds may function Se.g. 2,3',4-trihydroxydiphenyl) based on U.S. Pat. No.

4,396,647.

Claims (70)

1. An activatable catalyst effective for the reaction of a hydroxyl compound and an isocyanate compound and being activated in the presence of an amine activator or heat, comprising the reaction product of:
(a) a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof; and (b) a molar excess of a complexing agent selected from:
(1) a mercapto compound;
(2) a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine activator; and (3) mixtures thereof.

2. The catalyst of 1 wherein said tin catalyst is selected from the group consisting of stannous acetate, stannic oxide, stannous octoate, dibutyltin dioctoate, tin mercaptides, stannous citrate, stannous oxylate, stannous chloride, stannic chloride, tetra-phenyl tin, tetra-butyl tin, tri-n-butyl tin acetate, di-alkyl tin dicarboxylates, dimethyl tin dichloride, and mixtures; and said bismuth catalyst is selected from the group consisting of bismuth tricarboxylates, bismuth nitrate, bismuth halides, bismuth sulfide, basic bismuth dicarboxylates, and mixtures thereof.

3. The catalyst of claim 1 which additionally comprises an organic solvent.

4. The catalyst of claim 3 wherein said organic solvent includes a keto chelating agent.

5. The catalyst of claim 1 wherein the molar ratio of mercapto groups from said mercapto compound or phenol groups from said polyphenol to the metal content of said metal catalyst ranges from between about 2:1 to about 500:1.

6. The catalyst of claim 1 wherein said hydroxyl compound and said complexing agent are the same compound.

7. The catalyst of claim 1 wherein said mercapto compound is selected from the group consisting of trimethylol propane tri-(3-mercapto propionate), pentaerythritrol tetra-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol di-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol dimercapto acetate, trimethylol propane trithioglycolate, mercapto diethyl ether, ethane dithiol, thiolactic acid, mercapto propionic acid and esters thereof, thiophenol, thio acetic acid, 2-mercapto ethanol, 1,4-butanedithiol, 2-3-dimercapto propanol, toluene-3,4-dithiol, alpha,alpha'-dimercapto-para-xylene, thiosalicylic acid, mercapto acetic acid, dodecane dithiol, didodecane dithiol, di-thio phenol, di-para-chlorothiophenol, dimercapto benzothiazole, 3,4-dimercapto toluene, allyl mercaptan, benzyl mercaptan, 1,6-hexane dithiol, 1-octane thiol, para-thiocresol, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol, cyclohexyl mercaptan, methylthioglycolate, various mercapto pyridines, dithioerythritrol, 6-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, d-limonene dimercaptan, and mixtures thereof.

8. The catalyst of claim 1 wherein said polyphenol is selected from the group consisting of catechol, pyrogallol, 3-methoxy catechol, and mixtures thereof.

9. A catalyzed reaction mixture which comprises:
(a) a polyol;
(b) a polyisocyanate; and (c) an activatable catalyst comprising the reaction product of a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof; and (d) a molar excess of a complexing agent selected from:
(1) a mercapto compound;
(2) a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine activator; and (3) mixtures thereof.

10. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein said polyol comprises an aliphatic polyol and said polyisocyanate comprises an aliphatic polyisocyanate.

11. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein which additionally comprises a volatile organic solvent.

12. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein said tin catalyst is selected from the group consisting of stannous acetate, stannic oxide, stannous octoate, dibutyltin dioctoate, tin mercaptides, stannous citrate, stannous oxylate, stannous chloride, stannic chloride, tetra-phenyl tin, tetra-butyl tin, tri-n-butyl tin acetate, di-alkyl tin dicarboxylates, dimethyl tin dichloride, and mixtures; and said bismuth catalyst is selected from the group consisting of bismuth tricarboxylates, bismuth nitrate, bismuth halides, bismuth sulfide, basic bismuth dicarboxylates, and mixtures thereof.

13. The catalyzed reaction mixture of claim 9 which additionally comprises an amine activator.

14. The reaction mixture claim 13 wherein said amine activator comprises a tertiary amine.

15. The reaction mixture of claim 14 wherein said tertiary amine is selected from the group consisting of triethyl amine, dimethyl ethyl amine, tetramethyl ethylene diamine, trimethyl amine, tributyl amine, dimethyl benzyl amine, dimethyl cyclohexyl amine, dimethyl ethanol amine, diethyl ethanol amine, triethanol amine, pyridine, 4-phenylpropyl pyridine, 2,4,6-collidine, quinoline, tripropyl amine, isoquinoline, N-ethyl morpholine, triethylene diamine, and mixtures thereof.

16. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein the proportion of metal from said metal catalyst by weight of said reaction mixture ranges from between about 0.0001 and 1.0 percent.

17. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein the molar ratio of mercaptan groups from said mercapto compound or phenol groups from said polyphenol to the metal content of said metal catalyst ranges from between about 2:1 and 500:1.

18. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein said activatable catalyst additionally comprises an organic solvent.

19. The reaction mixture of claim 18 wherein said organic solvent includes a keto chelating agent.

20. The reaction mixture of claim 19 wherein said keto chelating agent comprises 2,4-pentanedione.

21. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein said mercapto compound is selected from the group consisting of trimethylol propane tri-(3-mercapto propionate), pentaerythritrol tetra-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol di-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol dimercapto acetate, trimethylol propane trithioglycolate, mercapto diethyl ether, ethane dithiol, thiolactic acid, mercapto propionic acid and esters thereof, thiophenol, thio acetic acid, 2-mercapto ethanol, 1,4-butanedithiol, 2-3-dimercapto propanol, toluene-3,4-dithiol, alpha,alpha'-dimercapto-para-xylene, thiosalicylic acid, mercapto acetic acid, dodecane dithiol, didodecane dithiol, di-thio phenol, di-para-chlorothiophenol, dimercapto benzothiazole, 3,4-dimercapto toluene, allyl mercaptan, benzyl mercaptan, 1,6-hexane dithiol, 1-octane thiol, para-thiocresol, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol, cyclohexyl mercaptan, methylthioglycolate, various mercapto pyridines, dithioerythritrol, 6-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, d-limonene dimercaptan, and mixtures thereof.

22. The reaction mixture of claim 9 wherein said polyphenol is selected from the group consisting of catechol, pyrogallol, 3-methoxy catechol, and mixtures thereof.

23. A catalyzed reaction mixture which comprises:
(a) a polyol polymer which bears mercapto groups, wherein said mercapto groups have been complexed with a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof, the mercaptan groups being present in a molar excess over said metal catalyst; and (b) a polyisocyanate.

24. The reaction mixture of claim 23 wherein the hydroxyl groups of said polyol polymer comprise aliphatic hydroxyl groups.

25. The reaction mixture of claim 23 wherein said polyisocyanate comprises an aliphatic polyisocyanate.

26. The reaction mixture of claim 25 wherein the hydroxyl groups of said polyol polymer comprise aliphatic hydroxyl groups.

27. The reaction mixture of claim 23 additionally comprising a volatile organic solvent.

28. The reaction mixture of claim 23 which additionally contains a tertiary amine activator.

29. The reaction mixture of claim 23 wherein said metal catalyst is a tin catalyst wherein the proportion of tin from said tin catalyst ranges from between about 0.0001 and 1.0 percent by weight of said reaction mixture.

30. The reaction mixture of claim 23 wherein the molar ratio of mercapto groups to tin content from said tin catalyst ranges from between about 2:1 and 500:1.

31. The reaction mixture of claim 23 wherein said tin catalyst is selected from the group consisting of stannous acetate, stannic oxide, stannous octoate, dibutyltin dioctoate, tin mercaptides, stannous citrate, stannous oxylate, stannous chloride, stannic chloride, tetra-phenyl tin, tetra-butyl tin, tri-n-butyl tin acetate, di-alkyl tin dicarboxylates, dimethyl tin dichloride, and mixtures thereof.

32. A method for curing a catalyzed reaction mixture which comprises:
(A) applying said catalyzed reaction mixture as a film onto a substrate, said catalyzed reaction mixture comprising a polyol, a polyisocyanate, and an activatable catalyst comprising the reaction product of:
(a) a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof; and (b) a molar excess of a complexing agent selected from:
(1) a mercapto compound;
(2) a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine activator; and (3) mixtures thereof; and (B) exposing said applied film to one or more of heat or an amine activator for cure of said applied film.

33. The method of claim 32 wherein said polyol comprises an aliphatic polyol.

34. The method of claim 32 wherein said polyisocyanate comprises an aliphatic polyisocyanate.

35. The method of claim 34 wherein said polyol comprises an aliphatic polyol.

36. The method of claim 32 wherein said reaction mixture additionally comprises a volatile organic solvent.

37. The method of claim 32 wherein said amine activator comprises a tertiary amine.

38. The method of claim 32 wherein said amine is in the vaporous state.

39. The method of claim 37 wherein said tertiary amine is selected from the group consisting of triethyl amine, dimethyl ethyl amine, tetramethyl ethylene diamine, trimethyl amine, tributyl amine, dimethyl benzyl amine, dimethyl cyclohexyl amine, dimethyl ethanol amine, diethyl ethanol amine, triethanol amine, pyridine, 4-phenylpropyl pyridine, 2,4,6-collidine, quinoline, tripropyl amine, isoquinoline, N-ethyl morpholine, triethylene diamine, and mixtures thereof.

40. The method of claim 32 wherein said tin catalyst is selected from the group consisting of stannous acetate, stannic oxide, stannous octoate, dibutyltin dioctoate, tin mercaptides, stannous citrate, stannous oxylate, stannous chloride, stannic chloride, tetra-phenyl tin, tetra-butyl tin, tri-n-butyl tin acetate, di-alkyl tin dicarboxylates dimethyl tin dichloride, and mixtures; and said bismuth catalyst is selected from the group consisting of bismuth tricarboxylates, bismuth nitrate, bismuth halides, bismuth sulfide, basic bismuth dicarboxylates, and mixtures thereof.

41. The method of claim 32 wherein the molar ratio of mercapto groups from said mercapto compound or phenol groups from said polyphenol to the metal content of said metal catalyst ranges from between about 2:1 and 500:1.

42. The method of claim 32 wherein the proportion of metal from said metal catalyst ranges from between about 0.0001 and 1.0 percent by weight of said reaction mixture.

43. The method of claim 32 wherein said polyol and said mercapto compound are the same compound.

44. The method of claim 32 wherein said applied film is exposed to an amine activator and then heated at a temperature of between about 50°
and 150°C.

45. The method of claim 32 wherein said activatable catalyst is dispersed in an organic solvent.

46. The method of claim 45 wherein said organic solvent includes a keto chelating agent.

47. The method of claim 46 wherein said keto chelating agent comprises 2,4-pentanedione.

48. The method of claim 32 wherein said mercapto compound is selected from the group consisting of trimethylol propane tri-(3-mercapto propionate), pentaerythritrol tetra-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol di-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol dimercapto acetate, trimethylol propane trithioglycolate, mercapto diethyl ether, ethane dithiol, thiolactic acid, mercapto propionic acid and esters thereof, thiophenol, thio acetic acid, 2-mercapto ethanol, 1,4-butanedithiol, 2-3-dimercapto propanol, toluene-3,4-dithiol, alpha,alpha'-dimercapto-para-xylene, thiosalicylic acid, mercapto acetic acid, dodecane dithiol, didodecane dithiol, di-thio phenol, di-para-chlorothiophenol, dimercapto benzothiazole, 3,4-dimercapto toluene, allyl mercaptan, benzyl mercaptan, 1,6-hexane dithiol, 1-octane thiol, para-thiocresol, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol, cyclohexyl mercaptan, methylthioglycolate, various mercapto pyridines, dithioerythritrol, 6-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, d-limonene dimercaptan, and mixtures thereof.

49. The catalyst of claim 32 wherein said polyphenol is selected from the group consisting of catechol, pyrogallol, 3-methoxy catechol, and mixtures thereof.

50. A method for curing a catalyzed reaction mixture which comprises:
(A) concurrently generating an atomizate of said catalyzed reaction mixture and a vaporous amine activator, said catalyzed reaction mixture comprising a polyol, a polyisocyanate, and an activatable catalyst comprising the reaction product of:
(a) a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof; and (b) a molar excess of a complexing agent selected from:
(1) a mercapto compound;
(2) a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine activator; and (3) mixtures thereof;
(B) mixing said atomizate and said vaporous amine activator;
and (C) directing said mixture onto said substrate to form an applied cured film thereof.

51. The method of claim 50 wherein said polyol comprises an aliphatic polyol.

52. The method of claim 50 wherein said polyisocyanate comprises an aliphatic polyisocyanate.

53. The method of claim 52 wherein said polyol comprises an aliphatic polyol.

54. The method of claim 50 wherein said reaction mixture additionally comprises a volatile organic solvent.

55. The method of claim 54 wherein said volatile organic solvent includes a keto chelating agent.

56. The method of claim 50 wherein said vaporous amine activator comprises a vaporous tertiary amine.

57. The method of claim 56 wherein said vaporous tertiary amine is selected from the group consisting of triethyl amine, dimethyl ethyl amine, tetramethyl ethylene diamine, trimethyl amine, tributyl amine, dimethyl benzyl amine, dimethyl cyclohexyl amine, dimethyl ethanol amine, diethyl ethanol amine, triethanol amine, pyridine, 4-phenylpropyl pyridine, 2,4,6-collidine, quinoline, tripropyl amine, isoquinoline, N-ethyl morpholine, triethylene diamine, and mixtures thereof.

58. The method of claim 50 wherein said tin catalyst is selected from the group consisting of stannous acetate, stannic oxide, stannous octoate, dibutyltin dioctoate, tin mercaptides, stannous citrate, stannous oxylate, stannous chloride, stannic chloride, tetra-phenyl tin, tetra-butyl tin, tri-n-butyl tin acetate, di-alkyl tin dicarboxylates, dimethyl tin dichloride, and mixtures; and said bismuth catalyst is selected from the group consisting of bismuth tricarboxylates, bismuth nitrate, bismuth halides, bismuth sulfide, basic bismuth dicarboxylates, and mixtures thereof.

59. The method of claim 50 wherein the molar ratio of mercapto groups from said mercapto compound or phenol groups from said polyphenol to the metal content of said metal catalyst ranges from between about 2:1 and 500:1.

60. The method of claim 50 wherein the proportion of metal from said metal catalyst by weight of said reaction mixture ranges from between about 0.0001 and 1.0 percent by weight.

61. The method of claim 50 wherein said polyol and said mercapto compound are the same compound.

62. The method of claim 50 wherein said substrate having said applied film thereon is heated at a temperature ranging from between about 50° and 150°C.

63. The method of claim 50 wherein said mercapto compound is selected from the group consisting of trimethylol propane tri-(3-mercapto propionate), pentaerythritrol tetra-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol di-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol dimercapto acetate, trimethylol propane trithioglycolate, mercapto diethyl ether, ethane dithiol, thiolactic acid, mercapto propionic acid and esters thereof, thiophenol, thio acetic acid, 2-mercapto ethanol, 1,4-butanedithiol, 2-3-dimercapto propanol, toluene-3,4-dithiol, alpha,alpha'-dimercapto-para-xylene, thiosalicylic acid, mercapto acetic acid, dodecane dithiol, didodecane dithiol, di-thio phenol, di-para-chlorothiophenol, dimercapto benzothiazole, 3,4-dimercapto toluene, allyl mercaptan, benzyl mercaptan, 1,6-hexane dithiol, 1-octane thiol, para-thiocresol, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol, cyclohexyl mercaptan, methylthioglycolate, various mercapto pyridines, dithioerythritrol, 6-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, d-limonene dimercaptan, and mixtures thereof.

64. The catalyst of claim 50 wherein said polyphenol is selected from the group consisting of catechol, pyrogallol, 3-methoxy catechol, and mixtures thereof.

65. A method for enhancing the stability of a catalyzed reaction mixture comprising a polyol, a polyisocyanate, and a metal catalyst selected from a tin catalyst, a bismuth catalyst, and mixtures thereof, which comprises forming said metal catalyst into an activatable catalyst by mixing said metal catalyst with a complexing agent selected from:
(1) a mercapto compound;
(2) a polyphenol characterized by being reactable with an isocyanate group in the presence of a tertiary amine activator;
and (3) mixtures thereof.

66. The method of claim 65 wherein said mercapto compound is selected from the group consisting of trimethylol propane tri-(3-mercapto propionate), pentaerythritrol tetra-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol di-(3-mercapto propionate), glycol dimercapto acetate, trimethylol propane trithioglycolate, mercapto diethyl ether, ethane dithiol, thiolactic acid, mercapto propionic acid and esters thereof, thiophenol, thio acetic acid, 2-mercapto ethanol, 1,4-butanedithiol, 2-3-dimercapto propanol, toluene-3,4-dithiol, alpha,alpha'-dimercapto-para-xylene, thiosalicylic acid, mercapto acetic acid, dodecane dithiol, didodecane dithiol, di-thio phenol, di-para-chlorothiophenol, dimercapto benzothiazole, 3,4-dimercapto toluene, allyl mercaptan, benzyl mercaptan, 1,6-hexane dithiol, 1-octane thiol, para-thiocresol, 2,3,5,6-tetrafluorothiophenol, cyclohexyl mercaptan, methylthioglycolate, various mercapto pyridines, dithioerythritrol, 6-ethoxy-2-mercaptobenzothiazole, d-limonene dimercaptan, and mixtures thereof.

67. The catalyst of claim 65 wherein said polyphenol is selected from the group consisting of catechol, pyrogallol, 3-methoxy catechol, and mixtures thereof.

68. The method of claim 65 wherein said activatable metal additionally comprises an organic solvent.

69. The method of claim 68 wherein said organic solvent includes a keto chelating agent.

70. The method of claim 65 wherein said coating composition additionally comprises a volatile organic solvent.