CA1301648C

CA1301648C - Solid-phase analytical device and method for using same

Info

Publication number: CA1301648C
Application number: CA000615951A
Authority: CA
Inventors: William E. Brown, Iii; John M. Clemens; Sharon M. Devereaux; John G. Hofler; Kevin M. Knigge; Sarah E. Safford
Original assignee: Abbott Laboratories
Current assignee: Alere Switzerland GmbH
Priority date: 1985-10-04
Filing date: 1990-12-06
Publication date: 1992-05-26
Anticipated expiration: 2006-10-03
Also published as: JPH0588785B2; ES2001811A6; DE3686116D1; KR870004305A; AU6350286A; JPH0650973A; AU613797B2; US5008080A; CA1281642C; KR940002520B1; DE3687276D1; DE217403T1; DE3687276T2; EP0389003A1; AU593285B2; JP2514878B2; ATE83325T1; JPH05180841A; US5149622A; EP0217403A2

Abstract

Abstract of the Disclosure A novel material and device useful in solid-phase binding assays to determine the presence or amount of an analyte in a test sample, particularly antigens or antibodies, is disclosed. The material comprises a porous matrix of fibers and a plurality of substantially spherical, solid particles having an average diameter of from about 0.1 to about 5 microns. The particles are retained and immobilized upon the fibers of the matrix.
Preferably, the particles have on their surfaces a substance capable of reaction with the analyte in the sample, and the average diameter of the particles is less than the average pore size of the matrix. The device, in a preferred embodiment, comprises a substantially planar layer of the described material.

Description

~301~

Related application This is a division of Canadian patent application serial No. 519,755 filed October 3, 1986.
Technical Field Thi~ invention relates geneeally to analytical devices and methods. More particularly, the present invention telates to a novel material useful in the pertormance ot binding assays, to impeoved anaiytical device~, and to methods ~or conducting assays utilizing the mateeial and the devices. The concepts of the present ~nvention are e~pecially advantageou~ in the pertormance Or enzyme immunoassay of biological ~luids and p~oduct~ ~uch as serum, plasma, whole blood, urlAe, spinal and amniotlc tluids, mucu~ and the like.

Backaround Art Various analytical procedures and device~ are commonly em~loyed in a~ay~ to determine the presence and/or concentration of substances o~ interest or clinical significance w~ich may be present in fluids oc othee materials. Such clinically significant or interesting substances are commonly termed nanalytes", and can include, for example, antibodies, antigens and the broad category ot substances commonly known by the tee~ Nligand~. Particularly with respect to the diagnosis and treatment o~ disease or other condition~
ot the human body, the accurate determination, on a timely basi~, ot the pre~ence oe amount in biological tluid~ of certàin analyte~ which are of clinical signi~icance can ha~e a protound intluence on the ~3(~1648 ability of health care professionals to treat and manage pathological physical disorders, or to make an early and accurate determination o~ physiological conditions such as pregnancy.
One assay methodology which has been increasingly applied in the diagnosis of various disorders and conditions of the human body is the binding assay, and in particular the type of binding assay known as enzyme immunoassay (EIA). EIA techniques ta~e advanta~e of the mechanisms of the immune systems of higher organisms, wherein antibodies are produced in response to the presence of substances (i.e., antigens) in the organisms which are pathogenic or foreign to the organisms. One or more antibodies are produced in response to and are capable of reacting with a particular antigen, thereby creating a highly specific reaction mechanism which can be advantageously utilized, in vitro, to determine that particular antigen.
Conventional ~IA procedures involve a series of wet chemistry steps using ligùid reagents, wherein an analyte in a sample biological fluid under assay, e.g., an antigen or antibody in a test sample o~ urine, whole blood or serum, i8 detected. ~n one type of EIA
procedure, the analyte in the sample initially becomes bound to a corresponding antigen or antibody reagent which is introduced into the sample. Then, another antigen or antibody is introduced. This second antigen or antibody, however, is one which has been labeled or conjugated with an enzyme or other substance capable of producinq or causing, o~ten when reacted with or in the presence of an additional, suitable indicator reagent such as a chromogen or dye, a detectable response such as color development. The detectable response so produced can then be read and interpreted, visually or instrumentally, as an indication or measure of the presence or amount of the anti~en or antibody present in the original sample.

~3~648 Solid-phase EIA procedures are generally considered preferable for both antibody and antigen assays because of their safety, ease of use, specificity and sensitivity by comparison with heretofore-employed liquid reagent binding assay techniques such as radioimmunoassay (RIA), and other conventional wet chemistry methodologies. Moreover, the possibility of reading color development instrumentally, such as by use of a spectrophotometer, is a feature of ~any solid-phase EIA techniques which has resulted in their wide-spread use.
Thus, in one type of conventional solid-phase EIA ~sandwich~ assay, a test sample suspected of containing an antibody or antigen of interest is initially contacted by a solid, substantially inert plastic or glass bead or other support material which has been previously coated with a protein or another substance capable of reaction with the antigen or antibody to retain it on the surface of the support, either by immobilization of the antigen or antibody on the surface or by chemical binding therewith. A second antigen or antibody, which is usually conjugated tlinked chemically) with an enzyme, is then added and this second species becomes bound to its corresponding antibody or antigen on the support. Following one or more washing step(s) to remove unbound material, an indicator substance, for example, a chromogenic substance reactive in the presence o~ the enzy~e, is then added and, because of its sensitivity to the presence of the enzyme, produces a detectable color response. The development of the color response, its intensity, etc. can be determined visually or instrumentally, and correlated with the amount of antigen or antibody which was present in the sample.

13-~G48 Such assay techniques, and the use of the solid-phase bead or other types of supports for conducting the immunological reactions and c~anges necessary in such assays, are well known, but have not been without drawbacks. For example, the necessity of elaborate ap~aratus for conducting the assay and ~or containing the liquid reagents employed often results in substantial labor and equipment costs, especially for low-volume testing of individual samples. Moreover, the accuracy and reproducibility of such assays may often be less than optimum, since it is sometimes difficult to manufacture conventionally-coated solid supports and other apparatus associated with such assays so that, for a particular assay, all of the materials used therein are specifically designed to meet predetermined sensitivity and specificity requirements. Accordingly, a need exists for relatively simple, easy-to-use and comparatively inexpensive solid-phase materials and analytical devices which advantageously can be used in ~IA procedures, and which are capable of producing rapid, sensitive and highly reproducible results comparable to conventional methodologies such as the aforedescribed, without the necessity ~or numerous, cumbersome wet chemical steps or complex instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention directly addresses the fo~egoing need, and provides, in one aspec~, a novel material useful in the performance of a binding assay to determine the presence or amount of an analyte in a test sample, and an assay utilizing the material. In another aspect, the present invention provides an improved, solid-phase analytical device, and a binding assay using the device, which is highly advantageous over devices ~3~48 C

and assay methods of the prior art. In yet another aspect, the present invention provides unique, on-board procedural controls for use with solid phase analytical devices. In yet another aspect, the present invention provides barrier means for restricting fluid flow in solid-phase analytical devices.
The novel material of the invention comprises a porous matrix of fibers and a plurality of substantially spherical, solid particles having an average diameter of from about 0.1 to about 10 microns, preferably from about 0.1 to about 5 microns, the particles being retained and immobilized within the matrix upon the fibers. In a preferred embodiment, the particles have on their surfaces a substance capable of reaction with the analyte in the sample. In a further preferred embodiment, the average diameter of the particles is less than the average pore size of the matrix.
The improved device of the invention comprises a substantially planar layer of the aforedescribed material, which forms a reaction matrix for a binding assay. The substantially planar layer has a first, sample-contacting surface and a second surface opposed to the first surface. The substantially planar layer is disposed in the device such that, when the device is used in the performance of a binding assay, at least a portion of the sample contacting the first surface passes through the substantially planar layer to the second surface. Preferably, the assay device of the invention additionally comprises filtering means disposed in relationship to the first surface of the substantially planar layer, such that, when the device is in use, sample fluid passes through the filtering means prior to contacting the first surface. It is further preferred that the device of the invention comprise absorbent means (for absorbing fluid passing through the substantially planar layer).

- 6 - 13~648 The concepts of the invention are advan~ageous not only in the perormance of binding assays to determine the un~nown presence or concentration of various analytes in test samples, but also to provide on-board controls for solid ~hase assay devices. As described in more detail, infra, a preferred solid-phase analytical device in accordance with the ir~vention can incorporate therein assay controls, such as a visible positive control area for displaying a negative result which enables unambiguous interpretation of test results in a visual assay system. Also, for`example, a preferred procedural control device utilizing the concepts of the invention can comprise the material of the invention, the material having within its porous matrix of fibers a substance capable of producing a detectable response to an analyte in a test sam~le under analysis.
The barrier means of the invention comprises a barrier material interposed between the reaction matrix and the absorbent means of a solid phase analytical device for restricting fluid entering the absorbent means from re-contacting the reaction matrix.
In addition, according to the present invention improved methods for performing a binding assay, utilizing the material and device of the invention, are provided. In one such prPferred method, a sample containing an analyte, e.g., antigen or antibody, is contacted with a reaction matrix made from the material. The analyte becomes bound to the reagent upon the particles retained within the material of the matrix; the matrix is then contacted with a second "labelled" reagent also capable of becoming bound to the anal~te which is bound by the reagent retained within the matrix. Alternatively, the second reagent can be an unlabelled antibody, followed then by addition of ~ 3~11648 labelled substance or reagent directed against the antibody tAmplification or Indirect immunoassay).
Thereafter, unbound material is removed, e.g.. by washing, and the device is contacted with an indicator substance which, in the presence of the ~label" o~ the second reagent, produces a detectable response which is indicative of the presence and/or amount of the analyte in the sample. Such a detectable response can be read visually or instrumentally, and can advantageously be a color response, most desirably in the form of the visible appearance of a ~+I~ or 1'-l' sign to indicate ~he result of the assay, particularly if only positive or negative results, respectively, from the assay are necessary or desired. Alternatively, quantitative or semi-quantitative results can be obtained by visually or instrumentally reading the detectable response.

3RrEP DESCRIPTION OF T~E DRAWINGS
Fig. l,is a side view in partial cross section of an andlytical device in accordance with.the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a top plan view of the device of Figure 1.
Figs. 3A, 3B and 3C are top plan views of a particularly preferred embodiment of the device of Fig.
1.
Fig. 4A, gB and gC are top plan views of an alternate embodiment of the device of Fig. 1.
Fig. 5 is a perspective view of the device of Fig. 1, showing the pre-filter removed from the body of the device.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The novel material of the present invention, and devices produced therefrom, although applicabl~ to many types of a~alysis, are especially advantageous when used in immunoassays, to improve conventional solid-phase immunoassay techniques for performing 13Ci1G48 colorimetric or other EIA of biological fluids, such as previously described. ~oreover, devices produced in accordance with the invention are relatively easy to use, and require fewer procedural steps and less comple~
assay technique, by comparison with prior art assays, and also provide the additional advantage of rapid quantitative, semi-quantitative or qualitative results for testing of unknown samples. The material and devices are additionally adapted for advantageous use as controls, e.g., to assess the accuracy and reliability of such assays. Moreover, during manufacture, devices of the invention can be relatively easily made. Assays utilizing such devices of the invention have also been found to be highly sensitive to various levels of analytes. The foregoing advantages, as well as other advantages, will be apparent from the detailed description of the invention as set forth herein.
The concepts of the present invention are applicable to various types of binding assays.
Schematic representations of examples of sever~l such types of assays for antigen and antibody analytes can be set for~h as follows. However, it will be appreciated that one skilled in the art can conceive of many other types of assays, including analytes other than antigens or antibodies, to which the present inventive concepts can be applied.
1. Direct AssaYs A. Antiaen (Aa) AssaY
Labelled Solid Phase AnalYte anti-analvte micro- ~ O ~ label partic}e Ab ; Ag Ab2 13~`1648 g Ab, may or may not be the same as Ab2 and may consist of a variety of monoclonal antibodies or polyclonal antibodies.

Examples of antigen analytes determinable according to the invention usinq the foregoing reac~ion scheme include, without limitation, Strep-A, beta-hCG and hepatitis B surface antigen ~HBsAg).

B. Antibodv (Ab~ Assav Labelled i) Solid Phase Analvte anti-analYte micro- ~ } ~ label particle Ag Ab Analyte examples (not limitative):
a-HT~V-III:
a- B c-IgM:
a-Rubella Labelled Solid PhaseAnalvte Anti-analvte micro- . ~ O ~ ~ label particle Ab Ag Ab Analyte example: a-HAV-IgM

~.3C~1648 }o 2. Indirect Assavs Antiaen AssaY

Labelled Solid Phase AnalYte Abl anti-Abl micro- ~ O ~ ~ label particle Ab Ag Ab Ab This is a group of assays where the label is not directed against the analyte. In this embodiment, anti-Ab, may be directed against Ab, in genoral, or may be directed against one or more functional groups incorporated into Ab.

~t i8 also desireable, in some cases, to capture the analyte directly on the solid phase, as follows:

Labelled Solid PhaseAnalYte Ab anti-Ab ~icro- ) O ~ l~bel part~cle Ag Ab Ab 3. comPetitive AssaYs AntibodY AssaY

Solid Phase ~ Sam~le:
micro- ~ ~
particle ~ Label: ~ label Ag 13~648 In assay scheme 3, both the sample and tAe label are directed against the antigen on the solid phase.
The amount of la~el bound reflects the amount of antibody in the sample.

Referring to Figs. 1 and 2 of the drawings, a preferred embodiment of the analytical device of the present invention is shown generally at 10. The preferred device 10 includes a substantially planar, generally circular, dis~-shaped reaction matrix 12. The matrix 12 comprises the novel materia} of the invention, as described herein, and is disposed within the device 10 such that within the matrix 12 the various chemical reactions and changes necessary to a binding assay can take place when the device 10 is used (as described, infra, in detail) in the performance of such assays, to determine the presence or amount of analyte(s) in a sample under analy3is. The matrix 12 has a sample-contacting surface 12a and a surface 12b opposed therefrom: a preferred composition of the matrix 12 is described in greater detail in the Examples, infra.
The preferred device 10 additionally includes a carrier 14 within which the matrix 12 is disposed. The carrier 14 can be made of any suitable material such as plastic, metal or other rigid or semi-rigid substance.
Especially preferred as a material for the carrier 14 is a plastic commercially known as "~BS", and available from the Monsanto Company, St. Louis, Missouri. In the preferred embodiment shown, the carrier 14 completely surrounds the matrix 12 and functions as a support and holder therefor. In order to accomplish this function, the carrier 14 has a generally circular flange 16 for supporting and holding tightly the matrix 12. As best shown in Pigs. 1 and 3a, a fluid chamber 17 for receiving a fluid sample and reagents used in the 13~1648 performance of an assay is defined in the device 10 by a sidewall formed by the outer wall surface 16a of the flange 16 and a base wall formed by the sample-contacting surface 12a of the matrix 12.
The preferred device 10 further comprises absorbent means 20 disposed in the carrier 14, as shown, for absorbing fluids during use of the assay device.
The absorbent means 20 of the device 10 can comprise one or more layers of material and is in physical contact, as shown, with the barrier material 18, when used, or with the reaction matrix 12. This especially advantageous feature enables excess fluid, during the performance of an assay using the device 10, to be easily absorbed, as necessary, after passage of such excess fluid from the reaction matrix 12 during the assay procedure. The absorbent means 20 can be virtually any moisture or fluid-retaining material, e.g., that available ~rom James River, and designated "105 point" or "50 point", or, as is especially preferred, a combination of one of more layers of each of the foregoing.
In another aspect of the invention, barrier means are provided for restricting fluid flow in solid phase analytical devices. This aspect is particularly advantageous when used in solid phase analytical devices having a permeable reaction surface or matrix, or filter layer, and an absorbant layer for absorbing fluids used in the device to permit the flow of fluids from the reaction surface to the absorbant means or layer while preveneing the back flow of fluids from the absorbant layer to the reaction matrix.
As shown in Figure 1, the barrier means comprises a layer of barrier material 18 extending under the matrix 12 and within the carrier 14. The barrier material 18 is in contact with the surface 12b of the :~3~i64~3 matrix 12, and ~unctions, when t~e device is in use, to restrict fluid passing through the matrix 12, to and through the surface 12b, and into the layer 18, from re-contacting the surface 12b. It is tO be appreciated that although it is most pre~ecred in a device of the invention to utilize the layer 18 as a fluid restrictive layer, to help to prevent or eliminate llbackground"
interference in the matrix L2, this feature is not essential or critical to the basic functions or concep~s of the ma~rix 12, and usually can be omitted from the device if desired. If omitted, the device generally will perform satisfactorily in an assay, but possibly with less sensitivity (diminishad detectable response).
The layer 18 can comprise any suitable material capable of restrictive, substantially ~one-way" flow of fluid or moisture. Examples of especially suitable materials for this purpose are polyethylene weave materials manufactured and sold by Ethyl Visqueen Corp., Baton Rouge, Louisiana under the designations ~ 6057 (1.0 mil) and ~-6108~ (1.25 mil) as well as those materials described in U.5. Patents 3,929,135 and 4,342,314.
It is to be appreciated that in addition to the capabillty of the preferred device 10, as described infra, to produce a visually-readable response such as color de~elopment indicative o~ an analyte in a test sample, instrumental determination can be made of a detectable response therefrom, e.g., corresponding to the reflectance of visible light, or intensity of fluorescence or the like, produced by the matrix 12 as a result of the chemical and biological reactions and changes which occur therein when an assay is performed.
Accordingly, the detectable response from the device 10 can be measured by, for example, a conventional spectrophotometer. For example, if the detectable 13~ 1648 _ 14 -response in the matrix 12 produced by the reactions and changes during a particular assay is one wherein a color is developed, and wherein increasing color development indicates an increasing level of a particular analyte in a test sample undergoing analysis, then a diminishing level of light reflected from the matrix 12 to the spectrophotometer corresponds to that increased level of analyte in the sample. The interpretation of such results is capable of being accomplished in ways well known to those skilled in the art, ~uch as by conversion of analog signalg generated by the detector of the spectrophotometer to digital information using largely conventional electronics. Such electronics are also well known to those skilled in the art, and are capable of producing a human-readable signal from such digital information which corresponds or correlates to the presence and/or amount of analyte in the test sample.
Referring now in more detail to Figs. 1, 2 and 5 of the drawings, the particular preferred embodiment of the analytical device 10 of the invention further includes filtering means 22 disposed over surface 12a of the reaction matrix 12. ~he filtering ~eans Z2 is press-fitted into the carrier 14 by means of a retaining ring 22a, and preferably has a removable portion 22b ha~i~g a handle portion 22c. The means 22 is further composed, for example, of a suitable porous, fibrous material 22d such as a glass or cellulose filter membrane iu a plastic surround especially preferred are IlLydair Grade 254l' from ~ydall, and ~GF/F~ or ~GF/D~
from Whatman, either singly or in combination. When the device 10 is used to perform an assay, the means 22 can perform various functions. Depending upon the type of assay being performed and the nature of the test sample, the means 22 can perform such functions as a reser~oir to retain sample or slow the passage of sample or 13~48 _ 15 -reagents to the reaction matrix 12: as a ~ehicle to retain reagents, e.g., lyophilized reagents, to be used in an assay; and as a llprefilter~ to remo~e extraneous articulate matter in a sample, or, for example, to separate and to hold blood cells from a whole blood sample while allowing plasma to pass through. In addition, as shown in Fig. 5, if the filter means 22 is at least partially removable from the device 10 (a feature preferred but not essential in the present invention), then during performance of an assay using the device 10, the removable portion 22b of the filter means 22 can be removed, as desired, during a step of the assay in order to remove material which may be retained therein, or to expose the reaction matrix 12 for the addition of reagents or to read a detectable response therefrom. In this case the membrane portion of the filter means 22 is an integral part of the removable portion thereof 22b.
In accordance with the invention, the material useful in the analytical device and methods of the invention comprises a porous, fiber matrix. By ~porous~
is meant that the matrix is composed of a material into which fluids can flow and can easily pass throuqh. In the material of the present inven ion, the property of porosity can be achieved simply by selection of an appropriate raw material, such as glass, cellulose, nylon or other fibrous material well Xnown to those skilled in the art.
For example, an especially pre~erred material for use is ~Whatman GF/D~ glass fiber filter paper, which has a nominal thickness of 0.032 inch. The thickness of such a ~aterial is not critical, and will be a matter of choice for the routineer, largely based upon the properties of the sample (and analyte) beinq assayed, such as its fluidity and the necessity to retain enough ~3~)1648 of the sample within the material for a long enough time to enable sufficient binding of the analyte.
In addition, according to the invention the fibrous material preferably has a plurality of substantially spherical, solid particles having an average diameter of from about 0.1 to about 10 microns or more, most preferably from about 0.1 to about 5 microns, retained and immobilized upon the fibers of the material. By l'retained and immobilizedl~ is meant that the particles, once upon the fibers of the material, are not capable of substantial movement to positions elsewhere within the material, ti.e., to other fibers), or cannot be removed completely from the material without destruction thereof. The mechanism by which the particles are so retained and immobilized is not known, but may be due to physical surface attractions between the fibers and the particles, and/or between the particles themselves. The particles can be ~elected by one skilled in the art from any suitable type of particulate material known generally as ~microparticles~: such particles are typically composed, e.g., of polystyrene, polymethylacrylate, polypropylene, latex, polyt~trafluoroethylene, polyacrylonitrile, polycarbonate or similar materials. Whatever type o~
microparticles is selected for use in the invention, it is important that the substance or substances of which the particles are composed be capable of holdinq on the surface of the particles a substance capable o reaction with an analyte in a test sample, e.g., antibody or antigen, or a combination thereof, or be itself capable of holding an analyte on the surface of the particles.
Moreover, the size of the particles is not critical, and so long as the average diameter of the particles is substantially within the aforestated range (although it is preferred that the average diameter of the particles 13U16~8 be smaller than the average pore size of the fibrous matrix), any type of particles having the foregoing properties is suitable for use.
The material and ana}ytical devices provided by the invention, it is to be appreciated, can be advantageously employed in a wide variety of o~herwise well-known assay techniques and procedures, and are not limited in application to the specific immunoassay techniques described in detail herein. They can thus be used in so-called "competiti~e bindingll assays oc similar binding assay procedures, and in addition, can be employed in other assays such as typical enzyme assays for ~uch analytes as glucose, uric acid or the like, which are not immunoassays but which can advantageously be carried out by initially retaining at least one reagent used in such assays upon the particles within the material or reaccion matrix of a device of the invention. It will be readily a~parent to those skilled in the analytical arts that the instant invention can be profitably applied to a wide variety of uses in various types of assay procedures, and thus is in no way limited to the specific details of the assays and procedures described herein.
The novel material, and analytical devices, produced in accordance with the principles of the instant invention can, however, be especially advantageously employed in enzyme immunoassays, particularly so-called "sandwichl' and indirect enzyme immunoassays. Such assays can be performed using the material and devices of the invention in a manner which is substantially more simple than typical ~bead~ or other assays of the prior art which require relatively elaborate, time-consuming and costly equipment and materials. Such assays also have been ~ound to be capable of surprising sensitivity. A generalized example for or.e presently ~3~64~

preferred ~sandwich~ immunoassay procedure utili2ing the material of the instant invention is as follows:
Step a) Retention of antibody or antigen upon the particles in the material, forming a reaction matri~, as ~reviously described;
Step b) Application of a test sample containing antigen or antibody to be determined to the matrix:
Step c) Application of an enzyme-conjugated antibody or antiqen to the antigen or antibody of Step b):
Step d) Washing, to remove unbound ma~erial; and Step e) Application of an indicator substance which, in the presence of the enzyme portion of the conjugate of Step c), produces a detectable color or other response in the reaction matrix.
A more detailed discussion of how such llsandwich~
assay procedures can advantageously be carried out using the device of the present invention is set forth in the Examples, in~ra.
In accordance with the presant invention, a detectable response is produced in the material or reaction matrix of an analytical device: the response is one which is indicative of the pregence and/or amount of an analyte in a sample under analysis. Such a detectable response, in pre~erred embodiments of the invention, can be color development following a series of assay steps, such as those previously described, or can be any number of responses well known in the analytical arts and used for similar purposes. For example, the response produced can be one of fluorescence, provided appropriate reagents are employed in the assay, as is well known to those skilled in the art. The response can be also chemiluminescence, or any of a Yariety o~ radiative energy responses (e.g., radioactive emissions) detectable either ~isually, or 13~648 instrumentally by various known equipment. Thus, it is to be especially appreciated that in use of the materials and devices o~ the invention, many different types of detectable responses are possible and desirable and the inventi~e concepts are not limited thereby.
In another aspect of the inventive concepts, "on-boardl' control areas are provided on solid phase analytical devices to simultaneously display detectable responses corresponding to a positive control (which will dis~lay a detectable response indicative of a valid assay result, regardless of the presence or absence of an analyte of interest in a test sample), a negative control ~which will display a detectable response change only if the assay results are invalid~ and the sample analyte in a single analytical device reaction surface.
In this a~pect of the invention, the same volume of a test sam~le and assay reagents are simultaneously placed in contact with the procedural controls and test areas, thereby avoiding the necessity of separate control tests as generally practiced in the art. Although this aspect of the invention will hereinafter be d-escribed in detail in connection with the presently particularly preferred reaction matrix and analytical device as heretofore described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that this aspect of the invention may be similarly employed with any analytical device having a reaction surface capable of simultaneously displayinq a plurality or multiplicity of reaction results. Such other ty~es of reaction surfaces include, for example, coated or uncoated fiber matrices, filters or membranes, relatively planar solid surfaces and the liXe.
Referr~ng now to Figures 3A, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B and 4C, on-board ~egative and positive control areas 30 and 32, respectively, are preferably provided on the reaction surface or matrix 12 of the analytical device 10. The 13~1648 negative and positive control areas may function in a quantitati~e manner thereby functioning as negative and positive assay reference controls, or may function in a qualitative manner thereby functioning as procedural controls indicating the validity of procedures and reagents used in the performance of an assay. As used herein, the term ~Icontroll~ includes both quantitative and qualitative embodiments. Negati~e control area 30 is formed by maintaining the control area 30 of the matrix 12 free of substances which will retain the enzyme label or other signal response mat2rial during the normal use of the device 10 in the pe~formance of a binding assay, as described herein. Positive control area 32 is formed by providing a substance capable of binding the enzyme label or other signal response material within the control area 32 of the matrix, regardless of the presence or absence of the analyte of interest in a tQst sample. As used in connection with the particularly prefQrred reaction matrix as previously described, positive control area 32 may be formed by coating the microparticles within the control area 32 with the analyte, or other substances capable of bindinq or r~taining the enzyme label within the area 32 du~ing performance of a binding assay. In addition, one or more analyte binding area(s) 34 are provided on the matrix 12 for binding or retaining the analyte of intere~t from a test sample on the area 34 during the performance of a ~inding assay. The analyte binding area(s) 34 may be formed in the particularly preferred reaction matrix material described herein by coating the microparticles within the area~s) 34 of the matrix 12 witA a su~stance, such as antigen or antibody, capable of binding the analyte.

13~648 The positive control area 32 and the analyte binding area(s) ~4 may be provided in any configuration which facilitates ease of use o~ the devic~ 10 in the performance of a binding assay. However, it is presently preferred to provide the positive control area and the analyte binding area in an interactive configuration in whic~ the positive control area interacts with the analyte binding area upon the occurrence of a positive test result to form a first representational symbol having a known meaning to the user, and the positive control area acts alone upon the occurrence of a negative test result to form a second representational symbol having a known meaning to the user different from that of the first rapresentation symbol. Tnteractive positive control and analyte binding areas are best shown in the particularly preferred embodiment of Figures 3A, 3B and 3C, wherein the ~ositive control area 32 is ~ormed in the shape of a rectangular bar or 1~-~ sign, while the analyte binding areas 34 are formed in the shape of rectangular bars on opposite sides of, and oriented perpendicularly with respect to, the positive control area 32. Accordingly, in use of the device of Figures 3A, 3B and 3C, a positive test result obtained from the proper use of the device 10 will result in a detectable response, in the shape of a ~-~l- sign, in both the positive control area 32 and the analyte binding areas 34, as shown in Figure 3C, indicatinq a ll~l' or positive test result to the user. A negative test result obtained from the proper use of the device 10 will result in a detectable response, in the shape of a l~ sign, in only the positive control area 32, as shown in Figure 3B, indicating a "-" or negative test result to the user.
If the binding assay is improperly conducted, or if reagents used in the assay function improperly, no 13~648 detectable response is obtained in either the positive control area 32 or the analyte binding areas 34, as shown in Figure 3A, indicating an invalid test result.
In addition, any detectable response in the negative control area 30, such as may be caused by non-specific binding or failure to properly perform washing steps in the performance of the assay, may be indicative of an in~alid test result. The configuration of Figures 3A, 3B and 3C is presently particularly preferred since it provides immediate infor~ation to the user in unambiguous, symbolic form as to the positive (~) or negatiYe (-) nature of the test result, and as to the validity of the assay.
Alternatively, the procedural control areas and the analyte binding areas may be provided in other configurations, as desired. In the alternate embodiment of ~igures 4A, 4B and 4C, the positive control area 32 and the analyte binding area 34 are formed in the shape of dots, as shown. Thus, a positive test result is indicated by the presence of two d~t-shaped detectable response areas, as shown in Figure 4C, a negative test result is indicated by the presence of a detectable response only in the positive control area 32, as shown in Figu~e 4B, and invalid test result is indicated by the lack of a detectable response as shown in Figure 4A. Other equivalent configurations for the negative control area 30, the positive control area 32 and the analyte binding area(s) 3g, such as other symbols, numbers and the like, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.

E~AMP~ES
The following Examples illustrate preferred ways of ~aking and using the novel material of the present invention, and analytical devices using the material, as 13Vi~;48 well as assay procedures utili2ing them. The analytical devices made had substant~ally the overall shape and appearance of the device shown and described herein with ceference to Figs. 1 and 2 and were prepared and utilized in assays according to the invention using the following procedures. However, the Examples are intended to be only illustrative, and in no way to be construed as placing limitations upon the scope of the invention, which scope is defined solely by the appended claims.
Unless otherwise indicated, all percentages expressed herein are by weight.

ExamDle 1: PreDaration of Antibodv-Coated MicroDarticles 100 microliters of carboxylate-modified microparticles (2.5% solids; 0.45 microns average diameter; commercially available from Polyscience and Seragen) were added to 1.0 milliliters (ml) of methyl ethyl sulfonate (MES) buffer ~5 millimolar (mM), pH
i.75) and 75 mic~oliters of antibody solution (beta-hCG) (2 milligrams per milliliter (mg~ml)). The solution was stirred and then 100 ml of 1-Ethyl-3(3-Dimethyl-aminopropyl) carbodimide HCl (EDAC) (Z mg per 10 ml H20) were added. The solution was stirred overnight at 2-~ degrees C, after which the microparticles were isolated by centrifugation, washed twice with 0.1%
~Tween-20~ solution, and resuspended in "PBS" Phosphate Buffered Saline (0.01 M KH2P04: 0.15M NaCl: pH 7.2) to yield a 0.125% solution. After resuspension in P~S, the particl~s were stored at 2-8 degrees C, for subsequent use in the following procedures.

ExamPle 2: Preparation of Solid-Phase Reaction Matrix 50 microliters of the antibody-coated microparticles from Example 1 were added dropwise to the center of a * trade mark 13C~648 What~an GF~D glass filter 100 microliters o~ pig serawere then added and the filter and microparticles incubated for 30 minutes in a humidity chamber at room temperature. After this time, the ~ilter, now containing the microparticles, was washed three times in 300 microliters of PBS buffer. The filter was then stored in a humidity chamber until it was used in the following immunoassay example. The microparticles were observed, by scanninq electron microscopy, to have been irreversibly trapped or agglomerated on the glass fibers of the filter material.
It i3 tO be noted that, in addition to the techniques described in the foregoing Example, antibody (or antigen) may be attached to the particles by a variety of methods: e.g., adsorption or use of various chemical activators. Also, it is to be appreciated that the particles can be added to the fibrous matrix after, for example, animal sera has been added, and that the use of such sera is not o~ critical importance.
Therefore, the order of addition of the particles to the matrix and treatment thereof after or before incorporation into the matrix is not critical to the present invention. Moreover, it will be a~preciated that coated fibrous materials, such as polystyrene-coated glass, can be used in place of the glass filter matrix material specifically described herein, and the advantages of the invention can also be realized thereby.

ExamPle 3: ImmunoassaY Protocol (Determination of beta-hCG) The glass fiber material, containing the antibody-coated microparticles as previously described, was cut into substantially circular ~disks~, and the disks, forming reaction matrices, placed in contact with ~32~1648 a blotter material in order to absorb excess fluid from solutions used in the assay. Thereafter, five drops of test samples of human urine (about 280 microliters), containing zero, and S0 and lO0 mIU/ml levels of beta-hCG (Table l, infra), were added to each matrix after passage of the sample dro~s through a prefilter situated above each matrix. Three drops of an antibody-enzyme conjugate (Table l, infra) were then added to each ~atrix through the prefilter, and each matrix was incubated at room temperature for about two minutes. The prefilter was next removed, and l.0 ml of a detergent wash solution was added to each matrix to remove any excess antibody-enzyme conjugate. Then, one drop of a chromogen indicator (Table l, infra) was added to each matrix, and after two minutes each matrix was checked visually for color development. Color development was observed for the test samples which contained beta-hCG, and the absorbance of light correlating to the color development was determined instrumentally using a conventional spectrophotome~er.
The results are set ~orth in the following table.

Table l Da~a for beta-hCG: Horseradish Peroxidase (~RPO) antibody-enzyme conjugate/3,3~,5,5~,- tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) chromogen (Absorbance after two minutes at 650 nanometers (nm)) (hCG) mIU/ml in urine samPles Instrumental Visual 0 O.OlS9 Not visible S0 0.0852 Visible lO0 0.2611 Visible i~l648 - ~6 -Table 2 Data for beta-hCG: Alkaline Phosphatase antibody-enzyme conjugate/Bromo-chloro indole phosphate nitro-blue tetrazolium chromogen.
(Absorbance after two minutes at 650 nanometers) (hCG) mIU/ml in urine sam~lesInstrumental Visual 0 0.0057 Not visible o.oa72 Visible 100 0.158g Visible The foreqoing antibody-enzy~e conjugates were prepared generally in accordance with the ~ollowing references: H~P0: Nakane, P.K. and Kawaoi, A., The Journal of HigtochemistrY and CYtochemistrv, 22 (12) 1084-1091 (1974); Alkaline PhosDhatase: Prepared by slight modifications to a Glutaric dialdehyde procedure, available from Boehringer Mannheim GmbH.
.~rine samples from twelve non-pregnant and six confirmed pregnant women we~e tested using the HRP0-antibody enzyme conjugate, described suPra. and substantially the procedure described in Example 3.
Twelve samples fro~ the non-pregnant individuals produced no visible color in the reaction matrix; i.e., all absorbances were less than 0.050, below which threshold no color can easily be visualized. Samples from all of the six pregnant individuals produced visible color upon testing.

ExamPle 4: PreDaration of beta-hCG Procedural Control 1.0 ml of microparticles (as previously described, 0.125% solids), having antibody to beta-hCG attached to ~3~fi48 their surfaces, were reacted with 14.0 microliters o~
beta-hCG solution (1.0 mg/ml). The solution was stirred for three hours at room temperature, and then stored at 2-8 degrees C until needed. No further washing of the particles was required.
50 ml of the foregoing procedural control microparticles, having beta-hCG bound to their surfaces, were diluted to various concsntrations and applied to the g}ass fiber filter material pre~iously described, in the same manner as the antibody-coated microparticles had been applied (described su~ra). The activity of each dilution was then checked by adding two droes (about 100 microliters) of HRP0-antibody enzyme conjugate, incubating for five minutes, washing with 1.0 ml of a detergen~ wash solution and then developing color by the addition of one drop (about 50 microliters) of TMB solution. The absorbance of each control was then measured using a conventional spectrophotometer, as set forth in the ~ollowing table.

Table 3 Dilution of Absorbance After Two Minutes at 650 nm Stock Solution 1:8 0.7118 1:32 0.2358 1:64 0.0983 The absorbance of the procedural control at a 1:32 dilution was found to be approximately equal to that of a 100 mIU/ml beta-hC~ standard.

Exam~le 5: Bacterioloaical Testina-Hete~oloaous Bacteria ,.
Assays for Strep A antigen, and assays for antigens for the various organisms listed in the following table, were performed using devices of the in~ention as - 28 _ previously described. The protocol o~ the assays can be summarized as follows:
1. A pre-prepared bacterial swab sample (prepared by a well-known technique) was placed into solution and pipetted onto the filter assembly over the reaction matrix of the device. The sample was allowed to pass through the ~ilter.
2. Two drops (about 100 microliters) of antibody-enzyme conjugate were added, and allowed to pass through the filter.
3. The filter was then removed and the matrix washed with 10-12 drops (about 500 microliters) of PBS Buffer.
4. One drop (about 50 microliters) of TMB were added, and color development in the matrix read after about 2 minutes incubation at room temperature.
The absorbance of 650 nanometer light reflected from the matrix was then determined, uging conventional reflectance apparatus, as a result of assays performed as aforedescribed on samples which contained the microorganism ant~gens listed in the following table.

i3~`11548 Table 4 AssaYs for ~eteroloaous Bacteria Microoraanisma Absorbanceb Serratia marcescens 0.040 Klebsiella pneumoniae 0.032 Pseudomonas aeruginosa0.04s Neisseria meningitidis0.034 Neisseria sicca 0.036 Haemopnilus influenzae0.051 Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I 0.084 Staphylococcus aureus Cowan II 0.049 Bordetella pertussis 0.041 Candida albicans 0.032 Streptococcus pneumoniae 0.056 Streptococcus agalactiae (Group B) 0.054 Streptococcus equisimilis (Group C) 0.063 Streptococcus faecalis (Group ~) 0.047 Streptococcus cariis (Group G) 0.101 Streptococcus pyogenes (Group A) 1.392 Negative Control 0.049 a ~icroorganisms were assayed at a concentration of 106 CFU per test.
b Absorbance at 650 nanometers.
ExamPle 6: Solid Phase Evaluation: Use of Various Reaction Matrix Materials Accordin~ to the Invention Zero concentration and 250 mIU/ml concentration beta-hCG-containing urine samples were assayed as previously described (Example 3) using microparticles which had been incorporated in various fibrous ~atrix materials, according to the invention. The materials listed in the following table were of different pore sizes and flow rates. The Whatman GF/D material was also pretreated before addition of the particles. An HRPO conjugate was used. In each assay, color development, indicatin~ success of the assay, was ~3~o~648 visually observed, and absorbance readings were taken at 650 nanometers. The results are compiled in the following table.

l~ ~ 0 ~ I
3~ ~ ~ro ~ I
O

N
ia~I~ 1` u ~ ~O I
. - . I
O ~ ~ ~ A
P~

e a~ o ~ o u~ 1 C~
E ~t~
u~O O O O O O O

E~

Ea~
u~ r o Y~ ~
:~o o o o o o o o o ooo oo E . . .....
O Q~
r ~: ~E, o O laE ~ ~_ a a-~ ~ a~
~3 ~ 3 ~ u~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o x V ~ V ~ cr V V--~ O
,~ Q~

~ " ~ JJ ~ :: 'J C C C ~ s V ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~C~ 0 0 C~
E E O ~ E O E E E ~ C
JJ J~ C,~ ~ lJ t~ ~ V J- ~ ~ O C ~
S~ ~J S ~ ~SSS+ ~ S
3 3 ~'- 0 :~ Cl 0 3: 3 3 u2 '~ U~ Cq . - --- ~

13(~1648 The foregoing data indicates that a variety of raw fibrous materials can be used in the novel ~aterial and reaction matrices of devices of this invention.
Such alternative raw materials can be used after pretreatment with protein sera or polystyrene (hydrophilic or hydrophobic) in order to change somewhat the characteristics of the material, as desired (e.g., flow rate).

ExamDle 7: Effect of Particle Si2e Particles ranging in size from 0.19 to about 3.0 microns (a~erage diameter) were added to samples of matrix ~aterials (Whatman GF/D)). The amount of antibody per sample was maintained at about 3.0 micrograms, and zero and 100 mIUJml beta-hCG-conta ining urine samples were assayed as previously described, using an alkaline phosphatase conjugate. Absorbance readings were taXen at 650 nanometers, The results are set forth in Table 6.

Table 6 Averaqe Diameter of Particles (microns~ Zero beta-hCG100 mIU/ml beta-hCG

0~19 .0065 .1037 0.50 ,ooSo .1500 0.90 .0076 .0825 3.0 .0061 .1227 ~3~i~i41~
_ 33 -The above results demonstrate ~hat particles ranging in size from 0.19 to about ~.0 microns in diameter are particularly effective, and thus preferred.
Particles within the range of from about 0.1 to about 5 microns, however, are suitable for use in the invention.
Also, since the pore size of the GF/D filter material is about 2.7 microns, the data shows that particles much smaller, or larger, than the average pore size of the fibrous matrix material can be ~sed.

ExamDle 8: ~a~id Assav for beta-hCG
An advantageously rapid, and procedurally simple assay for beta-hCG was conducted using an analytical device which had been produced in accordance with the present invention, as previously shown and described with reference to Figs. 1 and 2. The assay protocol was as follows.
Five drops of a patient urine specimen were applied from a medicine dropper to the center of a filter over the reaction matrix of the device, using a transfer pipette. The specimen was allowed to soak through the matrix (approximately 10 seconds). Three drops of antibody-enzyme conjugate (alkaline phosphatase) were then added and the reaction matrix incubated for 60 seconds at room temperature.
The filter was next removed and discarded, and about 1 ml of a citrate/NaCl wash solution, combined with Tween and Triton buffer solutions, was added and allowed to flow through the matrix.
Three drops of a chromogenic enzyme substrate (Bromo-chloro indole phosphate nitro-blue tetrazolium) were then added, and the color allowed to develop in the matrix for a full two minutes. Thereafter, another 1.0 ml of the wash solution was added, and the results read visually. The appearance of a visually-detectable 13~ 48 positivQ sign t~) indica~ed that the specimen contained elevated tgreater than about SO mIU~ml) leYels of beta-hC~. Samples run using th~ foregoing procèdure but not containing such elevated levels of beta-hCG produced a negative sign (-) in the matrix.
Tests run utilizing a substantially similar protocol to that of Example 8 but which did not result in the appeàrance of either a positive (+) or a negative (-) sign, indicated the improper addition of reagents, or indicated deterioration of reagents.
The following is a genaral example of the preparation of an analytical device accordinq to the invention, which additionally incorporates a procedural control area for determininq non-specific reactivity (int~rference) of the sample with the solid phase.
Reaction matrices utilizing the material of ~he invention can be prepared substantially as previously described, and the particles incorporated into the material in a pattern having substantially the overall shape of a "cross". The vertical axis of the "cross"
can be formed of the particles having an analyte-binding substance upon their surfaces, whereas the horizontal axis of th~ "cros6" can be formed of a substance capable of binding the enzyme label (i.e., antibody capable of becoming "con~ugatedl' or attached to the label).
Accordingly, when these reaction matrices are used in an assay (such as previously described), e.g., for beta-hCG, if no detectable level of analyte is present in the sample only the ~procedural control area~' of the matrix will produce a d0tectable response, i.e., the horizontal axis of the "cross" (a "minus" sign) will develop color or another response, indicating a negative result. However, if a detectable level of analyte is present, then the analyte will bind, along with the la~el, to the particle~ both in the horizontal and i3~ i48 vertical axes, producinq a detectable response in bo;h axes ta ~plusll sign).
Alternatively, the areas of the matrix in which the responses are produced can take the form of "dots", circles, numbers and the like. ThUS, the microparticles can be sprayed or otherwise dispensed into the material of the matrix and incorporated therein, as previously described, in various patterns as desired. While the foregoing controls have been described in this Example as used in connection with the presently preferred matrix material of the invention, the on-board controls may be similarly employed in connection with other solid-phase analytical devices, as previously described. The advantages of incorporation of such a procedural control into the material and device heretofore described, as well as into solid phase assay dev~ces usinq other types of matrix materials, include a) a control provides a measure o~ validation of materials for each assay run: b) a control with each assay run enables comparative interpretation of results, especially when specific patterns; such as "plus" ("I") and "minus" ("-") signs are used; and c) the incorporation of a control into each assay device provides expedient validation of the assay, allowing the user to be more confident of the assay results.
It is to be appreciated that various modifications and changes can be made in the specific, preferred embodiments of the invention as described in detail herein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as set forth in the following claims.

Claims

The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed, are defined as follows:

1. A material useful in a binding assay to determine the presence or amount of an analyte in a test sample, which material comprises a porous matrix of fibers and a plurality of substantially spherical, solid particles having an average diameter of from 0.1 to 10 microns, the particles being retained and immobilized within said matrix upon the fibers.
2. The material of Claim 1, wherein said particles have on their surfaces a substance capable of reacting with the analyte in the sample.
3. The material of Claim 1, wherein the average diameter of the particles is less than the average pore size of the matrix.
4. a solid-phase assay device useful in a binding assay to determine the presence or amount of an analyte in a fluid sample, the device comprises a substantially planar layer of a material having a porous matrix of fibers and a plurality of substantially spherical, solid particles having an average diameter of from 0.1 to 10 microns, the particles being retained and immobilized within said matrix uponm the fibers, the substantially planar layer having a first, sample-contacting surface and a second surface opposed to the first surface, and being disposed in the device such that, when the device is in use in the performance of the assay, at least a protion of the sample contacting the first surface passes through the substantially planar layer to the second surface.

5. The assay device of Claim 4, wherein the device additionally comprises filtering means disposed in relationship to the first surface of the substantially planar layer, such that sample fluid passes through said filtering means prior to contacting the first surface.
6. The assay device of Claim 4, wherein the device additionally comprises absorbent means disposed in relationship to the lower surface of the substantially planar layer, such that at least a portion of the fluid passing through the substantially planar layer is absorbed by the absorbent means.
7. The assay device of Claim 6, wherein the device additionally comprises a barrier layer interposed between the substantially planar layer and the absorbent means, the barrier layer being adapted, to restrict fluid retained by the absorbent means from returning to the substantially planar layer.
8. The assay device of Claim 7, wherein the barrier layer is composed of a polyethylene weave material.
9. A binding assay to determine the presence or amount of an analyte in a test sample, comprising the steps of:
a) contacting a porous matrix of fibers and a plurality of substantially spherical, solid particles having an average diameter of from 0.1 to 10 microns, the particles being retained and immobilized within said matrix upon the fibers with the sample, whereby analyte in the sample becomes bound to the particles forming an analyte complex on the particles;
b) contacting the material containing the complex on the particles with a second substance capable of reaction with the analyte, which is labeled with a substance capable of producing a detectable response in the presence of the analyte and an indicator substance, whereby the labeled substance becomes bound to the complex on the particles;
c) removing unbound labeled substance from the material;
d) contacting the material with the indicator substance; and e) detecting the response produced as a function of the presence or amount of the analyte in the sample.
10. The assay of Claim 9, wherein the detectable response is a visually detectable "+" sign when detectable amounts of analyte are present in the sample, and a visually detectable "-" sign when detectable amounts of analyte are not present in the sample.
11. The assay of Claim 7, wherein the analyte is beta-hCG, Strep-A antigen, or HBsAg.
12. The assay of Claim 9 wherein the particles have on their surface a substance capable of reacting with the analyte in the sample.
13. A method for producing a material useful for determining the presence or amount of an analyte in a fluid, comprising the steps of:
a) incubating with a sample of the fluid a plurality of substantially spherical, solid particles having an average diameter of from about 0.1 to about 5 microns, the particles having immobilized upon their surfaces a binding substance capable of reacting with the analyte, whereby the analyte becomes bound to the substance to form an analyte/binding substance complex on the particles; and b) contacting a porous, fibrous matrix with the incubated particles, whereby at least a portion of the particles become retained and immobilized within the matrix upon at least a portion of the fibers.