CA1239593A - Pressure swing adsorption process for supplying oxygen under variable demand conditions - Google Patents

Pressure swing adsorption process for supplying oxygen under variable demand conditions

Info

Publication number
CA1239593A
CA1239593A CA000446742A CA446742A CA1239593A CA 1239593 A CA1239593 A CA 1239593A CA 000446742 A CA000446742 A CA 000446742A CA 446742 A CA446742 A CA 446742A CA 1239593 A CA1239593 A CA 1239593A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
oxygen
bed
product
demand
pressure
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA000446742A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Ronald J. Grader
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Union Carbide Corp
Original Assignee
Union Carbide Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Union Carbide Corp filed Critical Union Carbide Corp
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1239593A publication Critical patent/CA1239593A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C02TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02FTREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
    • C02F3/00Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
    • C02F3/02Aerobic processes
    • C02F3/12Activated sludge processes
    • C02F3/26Activated sludge processes using pure oxygen or oxygen-rich gas
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/02Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography
    • B01D53/04Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols by adsorption, e.g. preparative gas chromatography with stationary adsorbents
    • B01D53/047Pressure swing adsorption
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2256/00Main component in the product gas stream after treatment
    • B01D2256/12Oxygen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2257/00Components to be removed
    • B01D2257/10Single element gases other than halogens
    • B01D2257/102Nitrogen
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40007Controlling pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40011Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • B01D2259/40013Pressurization
    • B01D2259/40015Pressurization with two sub-steps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40011Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • B01D2259/40028Depressurization
    • B01D2259/4003Depressurization with two sub-steps
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40011Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • B01D2259/40043Purging
    • B01D2259/4005Nature of purge gas
    • B01D2259/40052Recycled product or process gas
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40011Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • B01D2259/40058Number of sequence steps, including sub-steps, per cycle
    • B01D2259/40062Four
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40011Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • B01D2259/40058Number of sequence steps, including sub-steps, per cycle
    • B01D2259/40064Five
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40011Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • B01D2259/40058Number of sequence steps, including sub-steps, per cycle
    • B01D2259/40066Six
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/40011Methods relating to the process cycle in pressure or temperature swing adsorption
    • B01D2259/40077Direction of flow
    • B01D2259/40081Counter-current
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/402Further details for adsorption processes and devices using two beds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2259/00Type of treatment
    • B01D2259/40Further details for adsorption processes and devices
    • B01D2259/403Further details for adsorption processes and devices using three beds
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02WCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
    • Y02W10/00Technologies for wastewater treatment
    • Y02W10/10Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage

Abstract

PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION
PROCESS FOR SUPPLYING OXYGEN UNDER
VARIABLE DEMAND CONDITIONS
Abstract of the Disclosure In a pressure swing adsorption system for the supply of enriched oxygen to a variable demand waste water treatment system, the oxygen product to feed air ratio is increased during periods of reduced oxygen demand, with the enriched oxygen being supplied to the waste water treatment system at lower purity levels during such periods of reduced demand than the purity levels supplied under maximum demand conditions. Operation in this manner enables oxygen recovery to be enhanced and the power requirements to be reduced under such variable demand conditions.

Description

lX3~593 PRESSURE SWING ADSORPTION
-PROCESS FOR SUPPLYING OXYGEN UNDER
VARIABLE DUNNED CONDITIONS

Background of the Invention Field of the Invention - The invention relates to the supply of oxygen to a waste water treatment system. More particularly, it relates to the supply of oxygen to such a treatment system from a pressure swing adsorption system under variable demand conditions.
Description of the Prior Art - Pressure swing adsorption (PEA) processes and systems are well known in the art for achieving desirable separation and purification of at least one gas component from a feed gas mixture of said component and at least one selectively adsorbable component.
The selectively adsorbable component is adsorbed at a higher adsorption pressure after which the pressure is reduced to resorb said component from the adsorbent.
One use of the enriched oxygen product obtained in such PEA processes and systems is to supply suitable oxygen feed gas to a secondary waste water treatment system. Such a system generally provides for the treating of water containing biologically oxidizable material with a gas containing at least about 50~ oxygen by volume.
Typically, such systems have been designed for the use of enriched oxygen product having a purity of about 90~, and PEA systems have been designed to ~39593 supply enriched oxygen at this purity level to the waste water treatment system.
~astewater treatment systems of the type referred to above have an inherently variable demand for enriched oxygen product from the PEA system.
Thus, such treatment systems are commonly designed for full capacity conditions that may not be fully achieved until the latter portions of the operating history of the facility in which said treatment systems are located. In addition, it is common for such waste water treatment systems to exhibit variable load patterns as a function of daily or seasonable variations in water consumption.
Accordingly, it is usually necessary for such waste water treatment systems to be designed for maximum operating capacities that are expected to be fully utilized only during a portion of the expected operational life of the systems. In a similar manner, the pressure swing adsorption systems employed to supply enriched oxygen product to such variable demand waste water treatment systems must likewise be designed for maximum production capabilities that are expected to be required only during a portion of the total operational history of a waste water treatment facility. For a considerable portion of the operating time, therefore, the pressure swing adsorption systems in such facilities will be operated at lower than maximum capacity. It is highly desirable in the art, under such circumstances, to ensure that the PEA system employed to supply enriched oxygen to a variable demand waste water treatment system can be operated in an efficient manner under reduced demand, i.e.
less than full capacity, conditions.

~3~593 Turing periods of reduced demand, a PSA-oxygen system might ordinarily be operated at a correspondingly lower product/feed ratio that pertains under said full capacity or design conditions. Under such conditions, however, less enriched oxygen product is produced, and the recovery of oxygen product is reduced. Chile the purity of the oxygen recovered is higher than design purity under such lower product/feed conditions, the performance characteristics of the overall PSA-wastewater treatment system is diminished since such higher purity oxygen is not required, particularly under conditions of reduced, i.e. less than design, oxygen demand. Accordingly, PSA-oxygen systems having more efficient turndown capabilities were desired in the art, leading to the improved PEA
control technique of the Pietruszewski patent, U.S. 4,140, 495, wherein the product/feed ratio is maintained at the design level under reduced demand conditions, rather than being reduced as in the previous approach referred to above. The technique of the patent results in the production of oxygen product during periods of reduced demand over the course of a longer PEA processing cycle than would be used under maximum design conditions As a result, the unnecessarily higher oxygen purity levels previously obtained are avoided, and a constant oxygen product purity is obtained.
For secondary waste water treatment systems of the type herein of interest, the utilization of the oxygen supplied by the PEA system is a function of the oxygen feed gas purity. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, for a given oxygen demand, i.e. a fixed requirement of oxygen, the utilization ~23959;~

of available oxygen in the feed gas to the waste water treatment system will increase as the purity of the feed gas increases. An increase in purity results in a higher dissolution driving force and causes additional oxygen to be dissolved in the waste water being treated. It is, of course, desirable for waste water treatment systems to have a high oxygen utilization, which is the utilization of a substantial portion of the oxygen supplied in the feed gas for treatment of the waste water rather than being vented from the waste water treatment facility as part of the waste gas from said facility.
Typically, waste water treatment systems have been designed to utilize about 90% of the oxygen feed to said systems when operated at design capacity, and PEA systems are typically designed to supply enriched oxygen feed gas at about 90~ by volume purity to said waste water treatment systems.
Chile the PEA control technique of U.S. 4,140, 495 represents a substantial improvement over the prior practice, the supply of oxygen to the waste water treatment system at a constant, predetermined design purity level is found not to be necessary under reduced demand conditions. For example, although dissolved oxygen levels of about 6 mg/liter are considered satisfactory for particular waste water treatment operations, it has been found not unusual, at reduced demand conditions, for the dissolved oxygen levels to reach lo mg/liter or more so as to result in excessive dissolution of oxygen in the waste water. In this regard, it should be noted that it is not readily possible to unload the liquid mixing and oxygen dissolution equipment associated with the waste water treatment system so ~39~9~

as to avoid such excessive dissolution while nevertheless maintaining the Bahamas in suspension during reduced demand conditions. In addition, the constant oxygen purity technique of the patent is found to result in a decreasing oxygen product recovery under decreasing oxygen demand conditions as contrasted with the recovery at maximum design demand. Such oxygen product recovery decrease, indicative of reduced PEA performance at reduced demand conditions, is believed to be related to a more diffuse mass transfer zone with the adsorption bed under low gas flow conditions as are applied during periods of reduced demand.
While the increased oxygen utilization and increased dissolved oxygen levels achieved during the practice of the technique disclosed in the patent are, of themselves, desirable, the benefits thereof are not such as to obviate the desire for further improvement in the PEA supply of oxygen to secondary waste water treatment systems. In particular, it is desirable to achieve improved PEA performance, i.e. higher oxygen recoveries, than has heretofore been possible in the art. In addition, it is always desirable to achieve swings in the power consumption for applying oxygen to the waste water treatment system.
It is an object of the invention, therefore, to provide an improved PEA process for the production of oxygen for delivery to variable oxygen demand waste water treatment systems.
It is another object of the invention to provide a process for enhancing product recovery in such PEA oxygen operations.

~3g5~

It is a further object of the invention to provide PEA oxygen process having reduced power requirements in conjunction with the supply ox oxygen to variable oxygen demand waste water treatment systems.
summary of the Invention The oxygen product/feed air ratio in a pressure swing adsorption system supplying oxygen to a variable oxygen demand waste water treatment system is increased during periods of reduced oxygen demand. The enriched oxygen product is recovered at a lower purity level than the predetermined design level for maximum demand conditions. The product/feed ratio is adjusted between the conditions for maximum demand and the higher ratios for lower, variable demand such that the amount of oxygen released under lower purity conditions corresponds essentially to the reduced oxygen demands in the waste water treatment system.
Detailed Description of the Invention The objects of improving recovery and reducing power consumption in pressure swing adsorption systems used in conjunction with variable oxygen demand waste water treatment systems are thus accomplished by increasing the product feed rate and lowering product purity at times of reduced oxygen demand. For this purpose, the adsorption front of selectively adsorbed nitrogen is allowed to breakthrough at the product end of each adsorbent bed during the occurrent repressurization step of the cycle. The enriched oxygen product is thereby released prom the beds at a lower oxygen purity 3~5~

level than the predetermined design level. A
reduced amount of enriched oxygen product is released under such lower purity conditions, with the amount of product nevertheless corresponding essentially to the reduced oxygen demand for the waste water treatment system.
In the pressure swing adsorption process of the invention, oxygen is produced by the selective adsorption of nitrogen from a feed air stream in a pressure swing adsorption system having at least two adsorbent beds, with product oxygen being delivered to a variable oxygen demand waste water treatment system. Each adsorbent bed undergoes, on a cyclic basis, a processing sequence that includes concurrent repressurization from a higher adsorption pressure to one or more intermediate pressures, with release of an enriched oxygen stream from the product end of the bed; countercurrent repressurization to a lower resorption pressure and/or purge with release of selectively adsorbed nitrogen from the feed end of the bed; and repressurization to said higher adsorption pressure. At least a portion of the gas released from one bed during the concurrent repressurization step(s) is present to one or more other beds initially at lower pressures for pressure equalization and/or purge purposes. During periods of maximum oxygen demand for the waste water treatment system, an oxygen product/reed air ratio is maintained such that the enriched oxygen product released from each bed is essentially at a predetermined design oxygen purity level corresponding to the maximum design oxygen demand in the waste water treatment system. During such periods, the adsorption front of the selectively 13~98 ~2395~;~

adsorbed nitrogen advances toward but does not reach, i.e. breakthrough, the product end of the bed. In the course of practical commercial operations, the product/feed ratio is adjusted between the conditions pertaining to maximum oxygen demand, wherein oxygen at a design purity level is in sufficient quantity to satisfy maximum or design oxygen demand in the waste water treatment system and said conditions pertaining to lower, variable oxygen demand conditions, wherein oxygen product of decreasing purity is produced in response to lower oxygen demand in said waste water treatment system.
In the practice of the invention, the enriched oxygen product of a pressure swing adsorption system is passed, at variable purity levels, to a variable oxygen demand, secondary waste water treatment system. Such systems are well known in the art and generally involve the biochemical treatment of BUD (i.e., biological demand containing waste water by oxidation. The operation of the waste water treatment system does not constitute an essential part of the invention and is not described in detail herein for this reason. In general, however, BOD-containing water can be mixed with oxygen gas and active Bahamas in accordance with conventional waste water treatment techniques. Further information concerning such techniques may be found in published literature, such as the Whinier patents, US 3,547,811, 3,547,812, and 3,547,815. Although each secondary waste water treatment systems are designed for operation at a given capacity, a significant amount of operating time is typically carried out under ~2~9S~;~

reduced load conditions as was pointed out in the background discussion above.
Maximum oxygen demand design conditions are typically based on the production of oxygen product of about 90~ purity in the PEA system and the utilization of about 90~ of said oxygen in the waste water treatment system. It has been found that said nominal 90~ design oxygen utilization Jan advantageously be maintained, during periods of reduced oxygen demand, at lower oxygen purities than said 90~ purity utilized at full design, i.e. 100%
demand conditions. In other words, under lower demand conditions, a desired oxygen utilization in the variable demand waste water treatment system can be maintained by the use of lower purity oxygen.
For example, at 80% oxygen demand, an oxygen product purity of about 84~ is satisfactory to maintain said predetermined oxygen utilization level. Similarly, at 60~ demand, a feed purity of about 76~ will suffice, and at a lower oxygen demand of only 20%, an oxygen product orate from the PEA system of only about 61% will be satisfactory to maintain a design oxygen utilization in the variable demand waste water treatment system. By adjusting the product/feed ratio in the PEA system between the conditions for maximum oxygen demand and the higher product/feed ratios pertaining for lower, variable oxygen demand conditions, the oxygen product purity of the PEA
system is advantageously decreased in response to lower demand conditions in the waste water treatment system. As a result, the design oxygen utilization for the waste water treatment system can be maintained and enhanced PEA performance can be achieved. As indicated above, maintaining of the ~3~i93 design oxygen purity, e.g. 90%, under lower oxygen demand conditions, does result favorably in the utilization of even more than the design oxygen utilization, e.g. 90%~ in the waste water treatment system, resulting in an increase in dissolved oxygen levels to higher than design conditions. Chile increased oxygen utilization and higher dissolved levels are, of themselves, somewhat beneficial, such benefits are found to be marginal relative to the improved PEA performance obtainable by the practice of the invention.
Lower oxygen product purities are satisfactory under lower, variable oxygen demand conditions because the oxygen dissolution capability of the waste water treatment system is capable of supplying the required amount of oxygen at the desired utilization level under such lower oxygen purity conditions. By operating at higher product/feed ratio in the PEA system at reduced oxygen demand conditions, so as to produce oxygen of reduced purity, the oxygen recovery in the PEA
system is significantly enhanced over the results obtainable using the improved PEA turndown control of U.S. 4,140,495. It has been found that the process of said patent, wherein the processing cycle is regulated relative to user demand so as to maintain a desired, constant purity of oxygen product, undergoes a decrease in oxygen recovery under lower demand conditions. Such decrease in recovery at lower oxygen demand conditions is believed to be related to the presence of a more diffuse mass transfer zone at low flow conditions.
In contrast to the drop in recovery below 100% design recovery at lower demand conditions for I

PEA systems producing constant purity product, the recovery of oxygen product actually increases appreciably relative to said 100~ design point at reduced demand under the variable oxygen product purity conditions of the invention. This highly advantageous result arises from the fact that, in the practice of the invention, the PEA system is operated into bed breakthrough conditions during periods of lower, variable oxygen demand. under such conditions, the mass transfer zone is not fully contained within the bed, and product purity is not constant throughout the product delivery step. To the contrary, the product purity drops below the nominal 90~ design purity point as operation of the system continues during the concurrent repressurization product step, with the lower product purity corresponding essentially to the reduced oxygen demand of the waste water treatment system. In a representative comparative study, it was found that a constant product purity system has a decrease in product recovery to about 95~ of design recovery at 80~ oxygen demand conditions, while a corresponding variable product purity system operated in accordance with the invention experiences an increase in product recovery to about 105~ at said 80% demand conditions. At a reduced demand of about 60%, the constant product purity system achieves a reduced product recovery of about 90~ of design, while the variable, reduced product purity system achieves about 115~ of design recovery under such reduced demand conditions. At about 20~
demand conditions, product recovery for the constant product purity PEA system declines to about 85~ of design recovery, whereas the variable purity system ~3~59~

of the invention achieves nearly 130~ recovery under such very much reduced oxygen demand conditions.
In addition to such dramatic increase in oxygen product recovery obtainable by the invention under turndown conditions, the power requirement of the pressure swing adsorption system can be reduced by the practice of the invention in conjunction with variable oxygen demand waste water treatment systems. Thus, the practice of the invention utilizing reduced, variable purity oxygen during periods of lower, variable oxygen demand in the waste water treatment system results in reduced power consumption compared with the previous improvement, constant purity approach throughout the entire range of system turndown. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, at operations close to 100~ oxygen demand in the waste water treatment system, i.e.
minor turndown conditions, little difference in power swings is observed. Throughout the oxygen demand range of about 20-80~, however, the variable purity, high product/feed operations of the invention result in about a 10% power savings relative to the reduced power consumption operation at a constant design oxygen purity level throughout such reduced demand conditions for a waste water treatment system used in conjunction with essentially equivalent three bed pressure swing adsorption systems.
Chile the process of the invention can advantageously be practiced using various pressure swing adsorption systems having at least two adsorbent beds, it is particularly convenient to employ a three bed system in which feed air is passed to each bed in turn, in a suitable processing sequence with each bed alternatively supplying product oxygen gas to the waste water treatment system and being regenerated in continuous cyclic operations. In a desirable three bed embodiment of the invention, the processing cycle in each bed comprises (1) concurrent repressurization from higher adsorption pressure to lower intermediate pressures,
(2) countercurrent repressurization from said intermediate pressure level to lower resorption pressure with release of gas from the feed end of the bed, (3) passage of gas from another bed in the system to the product end of the bed for purge thereof at said lower resorption pressure, (~) partial repressurization from lower resorption pressure to intermediate pressure(s) by the passage ox gas released from at least one other bed undergoing concurrent repressurization to said bed for pressure equalization there between; and (S) further repressurization from said intermediate pressure level to said higher adsorption pressure by passage of feed air to and said bed. During the concurrent repressurization step, a portion of the enriched oxygen product released from the product end of the bed is passed as feed gas to the waste water treatment system, and a portion of said oxygen product is passed, in turn, directly to at least one of the other beds initially at lower pressure for pressure equalization and/or purge purposes. In a particularly desirable embodiment, said partial repressurization step (4) comprises pressure equalization, in sequence, with both other beds in the three bed system, and step (5) includes the release of enriched oxygen product gas from said bed during at least a portion of the overall step i93 time during which the pressure in said bed is increasing from said intermediate pressure level to said higher adsorption pressure.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various processing modifications can be made in the particulars of the process herein described without departing from the scope of the invention as recited in the claims appended hereto. For example, it is feasible to include a constant pressure adsorption step with release of oxygen product gas from the product end of the bed following repressurization of the bed to the higher adsorption pressure and before commencing concurrent repressurization in the bed. In the desirable three bed cycle referred to above, however, such a constant pressure adsorption step is not employed.
In a particularly preferred embodiment of said cycle, the concurrent repressurization step in each bed, wherein enriched oxygen is released from the product end of the bed, provides such enriched oxygen gas in part for introduction as feed gas to the variable demand waste water treatment system and in part for passage to the other beds in the system in an (a) first pressure equalization, (b) provide purge gas and (c) second pressure equalization sequence. In such particularly preferred embodiments, said further repressurization step (5) referred to above comprises (1) repressurization by the introduction of feed air to the feed end of the bed with no enriched oxygen product gas being withdrawn from the bed, and (2) further increasing pressure adsorption to said higher adsorption pressure with release of enriched product gas from the product end of the bed during said repressurization of the bed to the higher adsorption pressure. This provides a particularly advantageous PEA processing cycle for the overall purpose of the PEA system of the invention, namely the passing of enriched oxygen product, at variable purity levels, to said variable demand waste water treatment system.
It will be appreciated that the PEA system employed in the practice of the invention will include the necessary conduits to connect the feed air to the adsorbent beds and to provide for enriched oxygen product removal and for waste gas discharge from the system. The system shown in Fig.
1 of U.S. 4,140,495 illustrates a conventional system suitable for carrying out the practice of the invention, with the square root converter associated with pulse generator 74 not being used in the practice of the invention.
The particularly desirable embodiment of the invention referred to above is summarized as a sequential nine step cycle similar to that of Fig. 4 of said U.S. 4,140,495. In an illustrative example of the practice of the invention in accordance with this embodiment, each bed starts in a clean condition and proceeds through the following steps, namely (1) partial repressurization from another bed, I combined product and feed end repressurization, (3) repressurization with feed gas from the feed end only, (4) repressurization from the feed end of the bed with product discharge from the product end of the bed, (5) concurrent depressurization-pressure equalization with product discharge, (6) concurrent repressurization with product discharge, (7) concurrent repressurization-purge pressure equalization, (8) countercurrent ~3~3 repressurization and (9) purge of the bed. At this point, the bed is ready to begin another such cycle. In the illustrative example, step (1) is carried out for 10 seconds with the first bed of the system being repressurized from the lowest process pressure, e.g., 0 prig, to a lower equalization pressure or 8 prig. Step (2) is carried out for 15 seconds, with a portion of the nitrogen-depleted gas released from the product end of the third bed of the system being passed to the product end of said first bed, which is like being repressurized by the passage of feed gas to the feed end thereof. The first bed is repressurized to 25 prig during this step. Step (3) is carried from the 25 second point lo of the cycle through 60 seconds. During step (4), which extends for a ten second period, repressurization of the first bed continues until a pressure of 40 prig is reached, whereupon an appropriate valve is closed so as to discontinue said repressurization. The pressure equalization of step (5) is carried out for a 15 second time period with the flow of oxygen enriched, i.e., nitrogen depleted, gas from the first bed product end passing to the product end of the second bed of the system at the same time that feed gas is also being introduced to the feed end of said second bed. The beds are equalized at a higher equalization pressure of 25 prig. The third bed, in the alternating processing sequence of the invention, is simultaneously counter currently repressurized prom 8 prig to the lowest pressure of the process during this time. Step (6) extends from approximately the 85 second to the 120 second point of the overall cycle. A portion of the concurrent repressurization ~39~93 gas from the first bed flows to the product end of the third bed for an elapsed time of 25 seconds for countercurrent purge of the bed at lowest pressure.
The step is terminated when a programmed quantity of product oxygen gas has been delivered from the first bed for passage to the waste water treatment system.
Pressure equalization step (7) is carried out for lo seconds with the passage of gas from the first bed during concurrent repressurization thereof passing to the third bed product end for pressure equalization of the beds at the lower pressure equalization level of 8 prig. The second bed, during this period in the sequential operation of the beds, is beginning its delivery of product gas during this period, with the simultaneous repressurization of said second bed by an increasing pressure adsorption step by the passage of feed gas to the feed end thereof being discontinued when the pressure in the bed reaches 40 prig. The first bed undergoes countercurrent repressurization to lowest pressure during step (8) lasting lo seconds, from cycle time 130 to 145 seconds. The gas removed from the feed end of the first bed during this step is passed to a waste manifold for venting from the PEA system.
Simultaneously, reed gas flow to the inlet end of the third bed commences for its repressurization from both ends of the bed, while a portion of the nitrogen depleted gas discharged from the product end of the second bed is passed to the product end of said third bed for pressure equalization at the higher pressure equalization level of 25 prig. In the final step (9) of the cycle, the first bed is purged by the flow of nitrogen depleted gas discharged from the product end of the second bed ~3~5~3 through a back pressure regulator for such purge purposes. The step is terminated when a programmed quantity of product has been delivered from the second bed for passage to the waste water treatment system. The third bed is repressurized by the passage of feed gas to the feed end thereof during this time as the sequential operations continue on a cyclic basis in each bed of the system.
The product gas discharge period in the first bed, and in each bed of the system during said 9 step cycle comprises steps 4, 5 and 6. The total period for product delivery is conveniently divided into two parts when employing time delay control apparatus in the practice of the invention. The first part is of fixed duration set by a time delay relay, and the second part is of fixed product gas quantity as recorded by a counter. The relay and counter correspond to said relay 75 and said counter 77 illustrated in the conventional prior art system of Fig. 1 of U.S. 4,140,495. For example, the time delay could be set for 25 seconds and thereby correspond to the time period associated with steps to) and (5) of the nine step cycle referred to above during normal operation at full design capacity.
The second time period would be determined by a measure of the product gas quantity delivered during the concurrent repressurization associated with step (6) in each bed. When operating at full design capacity in the illustrated embodiment, this step would normally continue for about 35 seconds. Toe product oxygen/feed ratio during such periods of maximum oxygen demand for the waste water treatment system is maintained such that the enriched oxygen product released from the bed is essentially at a ~L~33'3593 design oxygen purity level corresponding is the maximum design oxygen demand in the waste water treatment system. At reduced demand conditions, however, this step (6) could continue for a longer period of time until a measured quantity of product gas is discharged prom the bed. During such reduced demand periods, the oxygen product/feed air ratio in bed is actually increased, such that the enriched oxygen product is released from said beds is at a lower oxygen purity level than the predetermined design level. It will be appreciated that the adsorption front of the selectively adsorbed nitrogen will break through at the product end of the bed during such concurrent repressurization under reduced demand conditions. It will also be appreciated that the amount of enriched oxygen product released from the bed under such lower purity conditions corresponds essentially to the reduced oxygen demand for the waste water treatment system under said reduced demand conditions. At such lower purity conditions, e.g., relative to a design capacity point of 90~ purity, product recovery is enhanced, and power requirements are reduced as discussed above.
It should be noted that, in the illustrative example, when the programmed quantity of gas during said step (6) has been reached, this step is terminated, and the concurrent repressurization - second pressure equalization step (7) is initiated in the first bed. At the same time, the second bed is advanced from its partial repressurization to 37 prig step to begin its increasing pressure adsorption step. During this step, it begins product delivery while undergoing ~39~

further repressurized to the higher adsorption pressure of 40 prig. The third bed is advanced from its purge step to its first partial repressurization during this time of step (7) in the first bed.
Thus, gas discharged from the product end of the first bed during its concurrent repressurization-pressure equalization step (7) is passed to the product end of the third bed for pressure equalization purposes between said beds. Each bed, in turn, will be understood to undergo the processing steps described with reference to the first bed as cyclic operations continue in the three bed system.
The product/feed ratio is adjusted in such continuous, cyclic operations, between the product/feed conditions associated with maximum oxygen demand, full design capacity conditions and the higher product/feed ratios applicable for lower, variable oxygen demand conditions, whereby oxygen product purity is decreased in response to lower oxygen demand. As contrasted to the conventional system, the process of the invention is advantageously carried out by the generation of control pulses proportional to the pressure drop associated with the product orifice rather than pulse generation directly proportional to product flow. If product demand through the orifice, corresponding to product orifice 72 of U.S.
4,140,195, falls to about 50~ of its full capacity amount, the pressure drop through the orifice will drop to about 25% of that associated with normal design capacity. For a given number of programmed pulses, such process control will result in allowing additional product flow relative to the conventional ~3~93 - AL -equipment of said U.S. 4,140,435 that employed a square root integrated associated with pulse generator 74 ox said potential system based on maintaining a constant purity of product oxygen from the PEA system.
In the practice of the invention under reduced oxygen demand conditions, the concurrent repressurization step in each bed will be understood to extend over a longer period of time than in the conventional system wherein a constant purity oxygen product is produced in the PEA system. As indicated above, each bed thus delivers product oxygen even when the mass transfer zone in the bed passes through the discharge end of the bed. As also indicated above, this circumstance, contrary to conventional practice, is satisfactory from the viewpoint of supplying oxygen to a variable demand waste water treatment system in that, during periods of less than full or design oxygen demand, said demand can be adequately supplied with lower than design purity oxygen. In the practice of the invention at a reduced oxygen demand of 60% of design capacity, for example, operation of the system in accordance with the invention will allow satisfactory performance to be achieved at an oxygen product purity ox about 76~, thereby resulting in a PEA oxygen recovery of about 54%. By contrast in the conventional practice wherein a design product purity of 90% is maintained, a PEA oxygen recovery of only about 42~ is achieved.
In a typical comparative example based on operation of a PEA system so as to maintain the concurrent repressurization step for about 35 seconds at normal design capacity, operation at the turndown ~:3959~

mode associated with said U.S. 4,140,495 would involve a concurrent repressurization step of about 65 seconds and operation in accordance with the invention would extend for a period of about 90 seconds in a comparable system operating under the same overall processing requirements. The additional time of product supply results in increased product delivery per unit of feed air, thereby providing improved oxygen recovery and resultant power savings.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that various changes or modifications can be made in the details of the system and operation within the scope of the invention as hereinabove described. As noted, the invention can be applied to PEA systems having any desired number of adsorbent beds and any sequence of desired processing steps provided that the product delivery step includes operation under mass transfer breakthrough conditions so that a variable purity oxygen product is produced during times of reduced oxygen demand. It will be understood that various features such as suitable computer equipment combined with means for measuring the flow of oxygen product through the product discharge orifice can be employed to control product withdrawal so as to achieve the variable oxygen purity conditions of the invention. It will likewise be understood that, while the design oxygen utilization level is typically maintained during periods of reduced demand, the invention can also be practiced with reduced, i.e., less than design, oxygen utilization levels at reduced demand.
Desirable power savings can be achieved in such embodiments of the invention. Those skilled in the .

~'3~3593 art will also appreciate that the invention can be applied with respect to applications other than the waste water treatment facilities referred to above.
Thus, other oxygen utilization systems, such as some incineration process operations that can similarly accommodate lower purity oxygen product at variable reduced demand conditions, can be effectively carried out in conjunction with PEA systems for producing oxygen under variable purity conditions corresponding essentially to said reduced demand conditions. The invention will be seen, therefore, as providing a highly desirable and useful modification of pressure swing adsorption technology to effectively supply oxygen for operations susceptible to variable demand conditions.

Claims (22)

1. In a pressure swing adsorption process for the production of oxygen for delivery to a variable oxygen demand wastewater treatment system, said oxygen being produced by a pressure swing adsorption system having at least two adsorbent beds, each of which undergoes, on a cyclic basis, cocurrent depressurization from a higher adsorption pressure to one or more intermediate pressures with release of an enriched oxygen stream from the product end of the bed; countercurrent depressurization to a lower desorption pressure and/or purge with release of selectively adsorbed nitrogen from the feed end of the bed; and repressurization to said higher adsorption pressure, with at least a portion of the gas released from one bed during said cocurrent depressurization step(s) being passed to one or more other beds initially at lower pressures for pressure equalization and/or purge purposes, the improvement comprising:
(a) maintaining an oxygen product/feed air ratio in each bed in the system, during periods of maximum oxygen demand for said wastewater treatment system, such that the enriched oxygen product released from said bed is essentially at a design oxygen purity level corresponding to the maximum design oxygen demand in said wastewater treatment system, the adsorption front of said selectively adsorbed nitrogen advancing toward but not reaching the product end of the bed during the cocurrent depressurization of the bed to said intermediate pressure(s);

(b) increasing said oxygen product/feed air ratio in each bed, during periods of reduced oxygen demand in said waste water treatment system, such that the enriched oxygen product released from said bed is at a lower oxygen purity level than the design level, said adsorption front of selectively adsorbed nitrogen breaking through at the product end of the bed during said concurrent repressurization of the bed, the amount of enriched oxygen product released from said bed under the lower purity conditions corresponding essentially to the reduced oxygen demand for said waste water treatment system; and c) adjusting the product/feed ratio between the conditions of step (a) for maximum oxygen demand and the higher product/feed ratios of step (b) for lower, variable oxygen demand conditions, thereby decreasing oxygen product purity in response to lower oxygen demand, whereby oxygen recovery is enhanced and power requirements are reduced in the operation of said pressure swing adsorption system in conjunction with said variable oxygen demand waste water treatment system.
2. The process of Claim 1 and including passing the enriched oxygen product, at said variable purity levels, to said variable demand waste water treatment system.
3. The process of Claim 2 in which said enriched oxygen product is maintained at sufficient purity levels, under said variable demand conditions, to essentially achieve a predetermined oxygen utilization level in said wastewater treatment system.
4. The process of Claim 3 in which said predetermined oxygen utilization in said wastewater treatment system is about 90%
5. The process of Claim 4 in which said predetermined design oxygen purity level is about 90%
6. The process of Claim 5 in which, at a reduced demand of about 80%, the purity of said enriched oxygen product passed to said variable demand wastewater treatment system is on the order of about 84%
7. The process of Claim 5 in which, at a reduced demand of about 60%, the purity of said enriched oxygen product passed to said variable demand wastewater treatment system is on the order of about 76%.
8. The process of Claim 5 in which, at a reduced demand of about 20%, the purity of said enriched oxygen product passed to said variable demand wastewater treatment system is on the order of about 61%.
9. The process of Claim 1 in which said pressure swing adsorption system comprises three beds.
10. The process of Claim 9 in which the processing cycle in each bed comprises:
(a) cocurrent depressurization from higher adsorption pressure to lower intermediate pressures, with a portion of the enriched oxygen product released from the product end of the bed being introduced as feed gas to said wastewater treatment system and a portion of said oxygen product being passed, in turn, directly to at least one of the other beds initially at lower pressure for pressure equalization and/or purge purposes;
(b) countercurrent depressurization from said intermediate pressure level to lower desorption pressure with release of gas from the feed end of the bed;
(c) passage of gas from another bed in the system to the product end of the bed for purge thereof at said lower desorption pressure;
(d) partial repressurization from lower desorption pressure to intermediate pressure(s) by the passage of gas released from at least one other bed undergoing cocurrent depressurization to said bed for pressure equalization therebetween; and (e) further repressurization from said intermediate pressure level to said higher adsorption pressure by the passage of feed air to said bed.
11. The process of Claim 10 in which said partial repressurization step (d) comprises pressure equalization, in sequence, with both other beds in the system, and step (e) includes the release of enriched oxygen product gas from said bed during at least a portion of the overall step time during which the pressure in said bed is increasing from said intermediate pressure level to said higher adsorption pressure.
12. The process of Claim 11 in which said cocurrent depressurization in each bed comprises a first pressure equalization, a provide purge gas and a second pressure equalization sequence, with a portion of the gas released during said cocurrent depressurization-first pressure equalization and said cocurrent depressurization-provide purge gas steps being introduced as feed gas to said wastewater treatment system.
13. The process of Claim 12 in which said further repressurization step (e) comprises (1) repressurization by the introduction of feed air to the feed end of the bed with no enriched oxygen product gas being withdrawn from said bed, and (2) further increasing pressure adsorption to said higher adsorption pressure with release of enriched oxygen product gas from the product end of the bed during said repressurization of the bed to the higher adsorption pressure.
14. The process of Claim 13 and including passing the enriched oxygen product, at said variable purity levels, to said variable demand wastewater treatment system.
15. The process of Claim 14 in which said enriched oxygen product is maintained at sufficient purity levels, under variable demand conditions to essentially achieve a predetermined oxygen utilization level in said wastewater treatment system.
16. The process of Claim 15 in which said predetermined oxygen utilization in said wastewater treatment system is about 90%.
17. The process of Claim 16 in which said predetermined design oxygen purity level is about 90%.
18. The process of Claim 17 in which, at reduced oxygen demands of about 80%, 60% and 20%, the purity of the enriched oxygen product passed to said variable demand wastewater treatment system is on the order of about 84%, 76% and 61%, respectively.
19. In a pressure swing adsorption process for the production of oxygen for delivery to a variable oxygen demand utilization system, said oxygen being produced by a pressure swing adsorption system having at least two adsorbent beds, each of which undergoes, on a cyclic basis, cocurrent depressurization from a higher adsorption pressure to one or more intermediate pressures with release of an enriched oxygen stream from the product end of the bed; countercurrent depressurization to a lower desorption pressure and/or purge with release of selectively adsorbed nitrogen from the feed end of the bed; and repressurization to said higher adsorption pressure, with at least a portion of the gas released from one bed during said cocurrent depressurization step(s) being passed to one or more other beds initially at lower pressures for pressure equalization and/or purge purposes, the improvement comprising:
(a) maintaining an oxygen product/feed air ratio in each bed in the system, during periods of maximum oxygen demand for said utilization system, such that the enriched oxygen product released from said bed is essentially at a design oxygen purity level corresponding to the maximum design oxygen demand in sand utilization, the adsorption front of said selectively adsorbed nitrogen advancing toward but not reaching the product end of the bed during the concurrent repressurization of the bed to said intermediate pressure(s);
(b) increasing said oxygen product/feed air ratio in each bed, during periods of reduced oxygen demand in said utilization system, such that the enriched oxygen product released from said bed is at a lower oxygen purity level than the design level, said adsorption front of selectively adsorbed nitrogen breaking through at the product end of the bed during said concurrent repressurization of the bed, the amount of enriched oxygen product released from said bed under the lower purity conditions corresponding essentially to the reduced oxygen demand for said oxygen demand utilization system; and (c) adjusting the product/feed ratio between the conditions of step (a) for maximum oxygen demand and the higher product/feed ratios of step (b) for lower, variable oxygen demand conditions, thereby decreasing oxygen product purity in response to lower oxygen demand, whereby oxygen recovery is enhanced and power requirements are reduced in the operation of said pressure swing adsorption system in conjunction with said variable oxygen demand utilization system.
20. The process of Claim 19 and including passing the enriched oxygen product, at said variable purity levels, to said variable demand oxygen utilization system.
21. The prowess of Claim 20 in which said enriched oxygen product is maintained at sufficient purity levels, under said variable demand conditions, to essentially achieve a desired oxygen utilization level in the utilization system.
22. The process of Claim 19 in which the pressure swing adsorption system comprises three beds.
CA000446742A 1983-02-10 1984-02-03 Pressure swing adsorption process for supplying oxygen under variable demand conditions Expired CA1239593A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US465,434 1983-02-10
US06/465,434 US4643743A (en) 1983-02-10 1983-02-10 Pressure swing adsorption process for supplying oxygen under variable demand conditions

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1239593A true CA1239593A (en) 1988-07-26

Family

ID=23847795

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000446742A Expired CA1239593A (en) 1983-02-10 1984-02-03 Pressure swing adsorption process for supplying oxygen under variable demand conditions

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US4643743A (en)
JP (1) JPS59162107A (en)
CA (1) CA1239593A (en)

Families Citing this family (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NO158082C (en) * 1986-02-11 1988-07-20 Norsk Hydro As METHOD AND PLANT FOR WATER TREATMENT, SPECIAL OXYGEN ENRICHMENT OF WATER.
US4725293A (en) * 1986-11-03 1988-02-16 The Boc Group, Inc. Automatic control for Pressure Swing Adsorption system
US4806132A (en) * 1987-06-23 1989-02-21 Union Carbide Corporation Turndown control method for membrane separation systems
USRE34434E (en) * 1988-09-12 1993-11-09 Praxair Technology, Inc. Oxygen enriched air system
US5227056A (en) * 1989-08-03 1993-07-13 Kaiyo Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Apparatus for improving the quality of a large amount of water and the quantity of dissolved oxygen therein
US4995889A (en) * 1990-02-23 1991-02-26 Air Products And Chemials, Inc. Control of product withdrawal from a sorptive separation system
US5042994A (en) * 1990-05-25 1991-08-27 Union Carbide Industrial Gases Technology Corporation Control of pressure swing adsorption operations
US5340381A (en) * 1993-05-17 1994-08-23 Vorih Marc L Operating system for dual-sieve oxygen concentrators
US5407465A (en) * 1993-12-16 1995-04-18 Praxair Technology, Inc. Tuning of vacuum pressure swing adsorption systems
NZ270453A (en) * 1994-03-15 1996-06-25 Boc Group Plc Venturi type mixing of gas into liquid via annular gap formed between converging slotted first duct extending into divergent second duct
GB9405000D0 (en) * 1994-03-15 1994-04-27 Boc Group Plc Gas dissolving
US5474595A (en) * 1994-04-25 1995-12-12 Airsep Corporation Capacity control system for pressure swing adsorption apparatus and associated method
FR2721531B1 (en) * 1994-06-27 1996-08-23 Air Liquide Process for the treatment of a gaseous mixture by adsorption with pressure variation.
US5593478A (en) * 1994-09-28 1997-01-14 Sequal Technologies, Inc. Fluid fractionator
FR2746668B1 (en) * 1996-03-27 1998-04-30 Air Liquide PROCESS FOR TREATING A GAS MIXTURE BY PRESSURE VARIATION ADSORPTION
US5917135A (en) * 1996-06-14 1999-06-29 Invacare Corporation Gas concentration sensor and control for oxygen concentrator utilizing gas concentration sensor
US5733359A (en) * 1996-06-19 1998-03-31 The Boc Group, Inc. Pressure swing adsorption process turndown control
US5989313A (en) * 1997-12-19 1999-11-23 Praxair Technology, Inc. Method for operation of an air prepurifier which takes into account inlet air conditions
DE10058335A1 (en) * 2000-11-24 2002-06-06 Messer Tatragas S R O Production of oxygen from air comprises pressure swing adsorbing oxygen from pre-cleaned compressed process air enriched with oxygen using a molecular sieve arranged as an adsorber in a pressure vessel, and removing the desorbed oxygen
US6585804B2 (en) 2001-11-09 2003-07-01 Air Products And Chemicals, Inc. Pressure swing adsorption process operation at turndown conditions
US7445660B2 (en) * 2005-04-27 2008-11-04 Carleton Life Support Systems, Inc. Method for operating gas generators in tandem
DE102012216570A1 (en) 2012-05-11 2013-11-14 Sms Siemag Ag Device for cooling rolls
MX2016013738A (en) 2014-04-24 2017-02-02 Praxair Technology Inc Regenerative furnace operation with an oxidant comprising 60 to 85 percent of oxygen.
US9782715B2 (en) * 2014-12-30 2017-10-10 Pacific Consolidated Industries, Llc Load following single bed reversing blower adsorption air separation system
ES2751176B2 (en) * 2018-09-29 2021-07-21 Bluegeneration S L Installation and procedure to recover gaseous substances from gaseous streams

Family Cites Families (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3547815A (en) * 1969-07-02 1970-12-15 Union Carbide Corp Staged oxygenation of bod-containing water
US3547812A (en) * 1969-07-02 1970-12-15 Union Carbide Corp High oxygen utilization in bod-containing water treatment
US3547811A (en) * 1969-07-02 1970-12-15 Union Carbide Corp Cyclic oxygenation of bod-containing water
US3703068A (en) * 1971-03-26 1972-11-21 Union Carbide Corp Control system for selective adsorption process
US3660277A (en) * 1971-05-17 1972-05-02 Union Carbide Corp Oxygenation-ozonation of bod-containing water
US4178239A (en) * 1974-11-13 1979-12-11 Union Carbide Corporation Biological intermediate sewage treatment with ozone pretreatment
US4132637A (en) * 1976-09-02 1979-01-02 Fmc Corporation Ozone disinfection in waste water treatment with recycling of ozonation off gas
US4140495A (en) * 1977-05-27 1979-02-20 Union Carbide Corporation Turndown control for pressure swing adsorption
DE2854060A1 (en) * 1978-12-14 1980-07-03 Linde Ag METHOD FOR PROVIDING A REPLACEMENT GAS FOR A CHEMICAL REACTION AND FOR SEPARATING A GAS SHAPED REACTION PRODUCT
DE2923325A1 (en) * 1979-06-08 1980-12-11 Linde Ag CYCLICAL ADSORPTION METHOD FOR DISASSEMBLING A GAS MIXTURE
DE2930782A1 (en) * 1979-07-28 1981-02-12 Linde Ag METHOD FOR ADSORPTIVELY CLEANING OR DISASSEMBLING GAS MIXTURES

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0141082B2 (en) 1989-09-04
JPS59162107A (en) 1984-09-13
US4643743A (en) 1987-02-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1239593A (en) Pressure swing adsorption process for supplying oxygen under variable demand conditions
US6558451B2 (en) Multiple bed pressure swing adsorption method and apparatus
EP0705636B1 (en) Improved pressure swing adsorption process
JP3232003B2 (en) Reflux in pressure swing adsorption method
EP0654439B1 (en) Improved vacuum pressure swing adsorption process
CA2199317C (en) Improved vacuum pressure swing adsorption process
US6811590B2 (en) Gas concentrating method and apparatus using pressure swing adsorption
US4406675A (en) RPSA Process
US6010555A (en) Vacuum pressure swing adsorption system and method
KR20000029194A (en) Pressure swing adsorption method for production of an oxygen-enriched gas
WO1995003873A1 (en) Method and apparatus for separating nitrogen-rich gas
US5997611A (en) Single vessel gas adsorption system and process
GB2335378A (en) Two stage pressure swing adsorption
USRE29941E (en) Method and apparatus for separating gases
EP0354259A1 (en) Improved pressure swing adsorption process
EP0849218B1 (en) Nitrogen PSA with intermediate pressure transfer
AU9701998A (en) Process for gas separation by adsorption with variable production rate
AU648231B2 (en) Process for the production of a gas having a substantial oxygen content
GB1593538A (en) Pressure swing adsorption process for gas separation
CA2072905C (en) Process for producing oxygen enriched product stream
US5074893A (en) Fluid adsorption system
JPH0532087B2 (en)
JPS636481B2 (en)
JPS60193520A (en) Turn down controlling method by pressure fluctuation adsorption method
JPS60210507A (en) Method for controlling turn-down in pressure fluctuation adsorption process

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry