CA1217838A - Method and appartus for detecting well pump-off - Google Patents

Method and appartus for detecting well pump-off

Info

Publication number
CA1217838A
CA1217838A CA000443475A CA443475A CA1217838A CA 1217838 A CA1217838 A CA 1217838A CA 000443475 A CA000443475 A CA 000443475A CA 443475 A CA443475 A CA 443475A CA 1217838 A CA1217838 A CA 1217838A
Authority
CA
Canada
Prior art keywords
signal
value
rod
rod string
load
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
CA000443475A
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Louis S. Mctamaney
Delbert F. Waltrip
Allan B. Delfino
Thomas I. Kirkpatrick
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Automated Controls Inc
Original Assignee
Automated Controls Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Automated Controls Inc filed Critical Automated Controls Inc
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CA1217838A publication Critical patent/CA1217838A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E21EARTH DRILLING; MINING
    • E21BEARTH DRILLING, e.g. DEEP DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
    • E21B47/00Survey of boreholes or wells
    • E21B47/008Monitoring of down-hole pump systems, e.g. for the detection of "pumped-off" conditions
    • E21B47/009Monitoring of walking-beam pump systems
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T74/00Machine element or mechanism
    • Y10T74/18Mechanical movements
    • Y10T74/18056Rotary to or from reciprocating or oscillating
    • Y10T74/18176Crank, pitman, lever, and slide
    • Y10T74/18182Pump jack type

Abstract

Abstract of the Disclosure Methods and apparatus for detecting fluid pound in a sucker-rod oil well, using maximum and minimum values of sucker-rod position and of sucker-rod load to calculate a reference position and a selected load value. The apparatus automatically calculates the reference position and the selected load value according to the characteristics of the well and of the well pump-ing equipment. When the sucker-rod moves downward to the reference position, the actual load value is checked against the selected value and in one embodiment of the invention a warning signal develops when the amount of the load exceeds the previously selected load quantity.
In another embodiment a warning signal develops when the rate of change of the load is at a maximum below the reference position. In a third embodiment a warning signal develops when a minimum rate of change of the load occurs below the reference position.

Description

The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for monitoring the operation of sucker-rod well pumping units, and more particularly to methods and appara~us for de~ecting fluid pound in wells employing sucker-rod pumping units.
Sucker-rod type pumping units are widely used in the petroleum industry in order to recover fluid from ~5 wells ~xtending into subterranean formations. Such units include a sucker-rod string which extends into the well and means at the surface for an up and down movement of the rod string in order to operate a downhole pumpO
Typical of such units are the so called "beam-type" pump-ing units having the sucker-rod string suspended at the surface of the well from a s~ructure consisting of a ~amson post and a walking beam pivotally mounted on the Samso~ post. The sucker-rod string normally is connected at one end of the walking beam and the other end of the walking beam is connected to a prime mover such as a motor throu~h a suitable crank and pitman connection. In this arrangement the walking beam and the sucker-rod string are driven in a reciprocal mode by the prime mover.
A variety of malfunctions such as worn pumps, broken sucker-rods, split tubing, and stuck pump valves can interrupt the pumping of fluid from a well. Such malfunctions can be caused by normal wear and tear on the e~uipment, by the nature of the fluid being pumpPd or they could be caused by abnormal pumping conditionsO
One abnormal.pumping condition which is faixly common is known as."fluid pound". Fluid pound occurs when the well is pumped-off t i.e., when fluid is with-"q r ~

'-`~91~

drawn from the wcll al: a ral~e yrcatcr t:J~In the ~a~e Al;
which fluid enters the well ~rom the formation. When this occurs, the working well oE the downhole purnp is only partially filled during an upstroke of the plunyer and on the down stroke the plunger strikes or "pounds"
the fluid in the woxking barrel causing severe jarring of the entire pumping unit. This causes damage to the rod string and to the surface equipment and may lead to failure of the pumping unit.
Summ~r of the Invention Y
The present invention provides new and improved methods and apparatus for detecting fluid pound in a well pumping unit having a sucker-rod string and a power unit to reciprocate the rod string to produce fluid from a well. A load cell is connected between the sucker-rod string and the power unit to develop a signal representa-tive of the load on the rod string, and a transducer is connected to generate a signal representative of the posi-tion of the rod string. In a first mode of operation of the present invention an updating means uses the load signal to establish a selected value of this load signal and uses the rod string position to establish a reference position of the rod string. Means are provided for moni~oring the load signal when the rod string reaches the re~erence position and means are provided for disabling the power unit when an absence of fluid below the pump plunger causes the load signal to exceed the selected value with the rod string at the reference posi-tion.
In a second mode of operation of the present invention the updating means uses the rod string posi-tion to establish a reference position of the rod string and uses the load signal to ~stablish the rate of change in the load on the rod string as the rod string moves in a downwaxd direction. When the fluid level is below the pump plunger, the plunger moves downward at an acceler-ated rate of speed and the rod position at which the maximum rate of change occurs a~ a lower position in the ~2~

~ownstro~e as the fluid level moves ~ownward. Means are provided for checking the rod position where the rate of change of rod load has a maximum value on -the downstro~e of the rod. ~eans are provided Eor disabling the power unit when the rocl position at which the rod load ra-te of change has a maximum value i5 below the reference position.
In a thircl mode of operation oE the present invention, the updating means uses the shiEt of the position of the maximum value of the load signal to determine when the pump plunger is moving progressively lower before the plunger reaches the level of the fluid in the well~ When this minimum load value is detected and the rod position is below the reference position, the power unit is disabled.
According to an aspect of the invention, apparatus for monitoring the operation of a well pumping unit having a sucker~rod string and a power unit to reciprocate said rod string to produce fluid from an underground location said apparatus comprises:
first transducer means for generating a signal representative of a load on said rod s~ring;
second transducer means for generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
means for using a maximum value and a minimum value of said load signal to establish a selected value corresponding to said load signal, and for using a maximum and a minimum value of said rod signal to establish a reference position of said rod string;
means for periodically updating said selected value by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal to obtain an updated selected value;
means for periodically updating said reference position by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position sicJnal with a -~a-prevlous mlnimum rod position signal to obtain an upda.ted reference position; and means for disabling said power unit when said value corresponding -to said load signal exceeds sai.d upda-ted selected value with said rod striny at said updatecl re~erence position.
According to another aspect o:E -the :invention, a method of monitoring the operation of an underyround well pumpi.ny unit, said unit having a sucker-rod striny, means to reciprocate said striny to pump fluid, means ~or genera~ing a signal representative of a load on said rod string, and means for generating a signal representative of a posltion of.said rod s-tring, said method comprises the steps of:
using said load signal to establish a selected value corresponding to said load signal;
using said rod string position signal to es-tablish a reference position of said rod string;
updating said selected value periodically by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal. with a previous minimum load signal;
updating said reference position periodically by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal; and stopping said pumping unit when said value corresponding to said signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference posi-tion.
The ability of the present invention to use rod string position signals in establishing a reference position for a particular well allows the apparatus to be used with a variety of wells and allows the well to be automatically recalibrated so the well equipment can be operated for extended periods of time without human intervention. The establishing means includes a micro-processor which stores programs and certain well para--4b-meters in nonvolatile memories so that a loss of power at -the es-tablishing means will not cause a loss of proyrams or well parameters, and so operation and control of the well will resume when power is restored.
The programs in the microprocessor can be se:Lected so that any one or all oc the three modes o~ operation of the present invention can be used with a well which is controlled by the well equipment. Wells dif~er ln the:ir incl:ividual characteristics and one o~ the mocles may work best Eor a particular well. If desired, all of the modes of operation can be used with a given well and the microprocessor can be programmed to disable the power unit when any one or more of the modes determines that pump-off has occurred. The microprocessor can be also programmed to disable the power unit ~5 ~æ~

only when a majority o~ thc modes of opera~ion dctcrminc that pump-off has occurred. However, it has been found that a single mode oE opcration usually provides reliable detection of well pump o~f.
Brief Des ~
Figure 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a well equipped with a sucker-rod type pumping unit.
Figure 2 is a plot of the position vs. load of the sucker-rod of the pump for one cycle of normal opera-tion and showing a reference point in the plot.
Figure 3 is a plot of position vs. load of the sucker-rod as the well progresses into fluid pound.
Figure 4 is a plot of position vs. load of the sucker-rod as the well progresses into gas pound.
Figuxe 5 is a graph illustrating the process of interpolation of values of sucker-rod position and load values to accurately determine the load value at a reference position.
Figure 6 is a message flow diagram showing a first mode of operation of the appaxatus of Figure 1.
Figure 7 is a state diagram of a set point fluid pound detector of Figure 6 used to detect well pump-off.
Figures 8~, 8B comprise computer circuitry which can be used in the apparatus of Figure 1.
Figure 9 is a matrix diagram illustratiny the operation of software state machines us~d in the present invention.
Figure 10 is a diagram illustrating symbology of a typical software state machine used in the present invention.
Figure 11 illustrates a message switched soft-ware operating system of the present invention, Figure 12 illustrates a software s-tate machine scheduler of the present invention.
Figures 13 and 14 illustrate the fl~w of data through the operating system and math utility of the present invention~

3~

~ i~urc lS iLIus~ra~cs -~y~ica~ l~osi~:Lorl an~
position derivative waveforms in the apparatus o~ the present invention.
Figure 16 illustrates the relationship between smoothed (filtered) data signals and noisy (unfiltered) signals and shows signal phase shifts which must be con-sidered in apparatus of the present invention.
Figure 17 is a message flow diagram of a stroke discriminator of the present invention.
Figure 18 is a software state diagram of the stroke discriminator of the present invention.
Figure 19 is a software state diagram of a stroke d~rivative detector of the present invention.
Figure 20 is a software state diagram of a stroke extremes det~ctor of the present invention.
Figure 21 is a software state diagram of a stroke area calculator of the present invention.
Figure 22 illustrates a procedure used in calculating the area inside a dynagraph curve for a typical well.
Figure 23 is a message flow diagram of a second mode of operation of the fluid pound detector of the present invention.
Figure 24 is a message flow diagram for the fluid pound detector of Figure 23.
Figure 25 is a plot of position vs. load like Figure 3, but illustrating a second mode of operation of the apparatus of Figure 1.
Figure 26 illustrates the calibration of the apparatus of Figure 1 for use with the third mode of operation to reduce the effects of noise signals in the apparatus.
Figure 27 is a plot of position vs. load like Figure 3, but illustrating a third mode of operation of the apparatus of Figure 1.
Figure 28 is a message flow diagram for the third mode of operation of the apparatus of Figure 1.
Figures 29 and 30 are software state diagrams illustratiny thc third mod~ of opera-tiorl c~ th~ apparatus of Figure 1.
Description oE the Preferred ~mbodiment Referring to Figure 1, there is illustrated a wellhead 10 of a well which extends frorn the earth's sur-face 11 into a subsurface well producing formation (not shown~. The wellhead comprises the upper portions of a casing string 12 with a sucker-rod string 16 extending downward into a down hole pump (not shown) which moves liquid to the surface where it passes into a flow line 17.
The sucker-rod string 16 is suspended in the well from a support unit consisting of a support post 18 and a walk-ing beam 22 which is pivotally mounted on the support post by a pin connectlon 23. A load cell 24 is connect-ed between ~he upper end of the sucker-rod string 16 and the lower end of a cable section 23. The cable section 28 is connected to the walking beam 22 by means of a horsehead 29.
The walking beam 22 is reciprocated by a prime mover such as an electric motor 30. The prime mover drives the walking beam through a drive system which includes a drive belt 34~ crank 35~ crank shaft 36, crank arm 37, and a pitman 41 which is pivotally connect-ed between the crank arm and the walking beam by means of pin connections 42, 43. The outer end of the crank arm 37 is provided with a counterweight 47 which balances a portion of the load on the sucker-rod string in order to provide a more constant load on the prime mover.
The load cell ~4 provides a DC output signal which is proportional to the load on the sucker-rod string 16, and an analog-to-digital converter 48a pro-vides a corresponding digital signal to a computer 49a.
A position measuring means or transducer 53 includes an actuating arm 54 for measuring the vertical position of the sucker-rod string 16 by providing a voltage which is proportional to the angle of the walking beam 22 and thus is proportional to the position of the rod string 16. The digi-tal-to-al-~alog converter ~8a also conver-ts the signal from the transducer 53 into a digital sigrlal which is used by th~ compu-ter 49a. SicJnals are trans-ferred from the computer 49a to a computer 49b by a pair of universal synchronous asynchronous receivcr transmit-ters (USARTs) 55a, 55b for controlling the operation of an XY plotter 59. Instructions from a keyboard and display unit 60 and outpu~ signals from the load cell 24 are used by the XY plotter to provide a visual plot of the characteristics of the particular well which the rod string operates. The plotter 59 can be used for observ-ing operation of the well and for setting up the equip-ment to monitor the well. After setup is completed the plotter can be disconnected, or if desired the plotter can be eliminated altogether and other means for setting up the equipment can be used. Analog signals from the XY
plotter 59 are converted into digital signals by an analog-to-digital converter 48b for use by the computer 49b and digital signals from the computer 49b are con-verted into analog signals by a digital-to analog con-verter 61 for use by the plotter.
A plot of the position versus load of the rod string 16 for a typical cycle of the rod string when the well is filled with fluid is disclosed in Figure 2. It can be seen that as th~ rod string moves on the upstroke from the Xmin position to the Xmax position, the load on the string increases to a maximum value and then returns to approximately the initial value. Of more importance is the variation in the load as the rod string moves downward with the load decreasing to a minimum value at a fairly rapid rate and then moving upward to approximately the original value at the Xmin position.
As the well approaches pump-off ~Fig. 3), the load on the rod string changes more rapidly as the rod string moves in a downward direction. When the fluid in the well drops, a pump plunger in the pump falls and strikes the surface of the fluid in the well producing a "fluid pound" which can damage the rod string and other 3~

parts of -the pumpin~ system. ~s the ~]uid levcl in -the well decreases the pump plunyer progressively moves a ~rcater distancc on tho clownstrokc bc~orc contac~in~J
the surface of ~he fluid in the well causing the plotted load curve to progressively change from the full well curve 65 to the dotted curves 66 - 69 wi~h the curve mov-ing progressively toward the left as the fluid in the well drops lower. This moving trend can be observed and the pump shut down to prevent damage to the equipment.
The present invention provides a first method for detecting pump-off by using the apparatus of Figure 1 to select a set point (Xset, Yset) (Figs. 2, 3) having a value determined by the characteristics of each individual well and to rhange the set point when these characteris-tics change. The computer 49a (Fig. 1) compares the fluid pound curves 66 - 69 with the position of the set poin~
and shuts down the motor 30 when the fluid pound curve moves to the left of the set point shown in Figure 3.
A human operator uses the keyboard 60 or other input to the computer 49b (Fig. 1) to enter an X per-centage value and a Y percentage value into the computer 49b which transfers these values to the computer 49a causing the computer 49a to calculate an XsPt value the entered percent of the distance between Xmin and Xmax (Fig. 2), and to calculate a Yset value the entered per-cent of the distance between Ymin and Ymax thereby ob-taining the position of the set point. The value of Xset and Yset can be computed using the following formulae:
X~et = (Xmax - Xmin) (X% . 100) + Xmin Yset = (Ymax - Ymin) (Y~ ~ 100) + Ymin The values of Xmax, Xmin, Ymax and Ymin which can be used are the maximum and minimum values of the cu.rve of Figures 2 and 3. The X% and Y~ are the per-centage values selected by the human operator using knowledge of the well and of the pumping equipment in choosing these percentage values. Also any two nominal values of X and any two nominal values of Y can be 7i!~13~

selected instead of usiny the maximuln arld mini~llulll valuc~
suggested. If the characteristics of the well or i-ts pump, etc. should change so the curve of Fiyures 2 and 3 changes, the computer will recalculate the position of the set point.
When the set point (Xset, Yse-t) has been selected the computer continually monitors the X value of the curve (Fig. 3) during the downstroke of the plunger until the curve reaches the value of Xset as the curve moves from Xmax toward Xmin. With the curve at Xset point the computer checks the value of Y. If the value of Y is greater than the ~alue of Yset the computer 49a (Fig. 1) provides a signal which causes the motor 30 to stop and the well is shut down. To insure that the well is really pumped-off at this time, it may be desirable to allow the pump to move through two or more cycles with the curve (Fig. 2) to the left of the set point each time, before the motor 30 is turned off. This pre-v~nts shut down of the well due to an erratic signal from the load cell 24 or from the transducer 53 or from other electronic equipment or from the behavior of the well itself.
It is also important to be able to distinguish the difference between fluid pour.d and "gas pound" in the well being monitored. Gas pound occurs when the well is filled with fluid but gas is present in the fluid being withdrawn from the well, and the gas delays the shift of the fluid load from a valve in the pump in the down-stroke because the gas is compressible. However, the gas and fluid mixture offers more resistance to downward movement of the plunger than is offered in a pump-off condition so the plunger drops more slowly than in fluid pound. These differences can be seen by comparing the full well card of Figure 2 with the fluid pound curve of ~igure 3 and with the gas pound curve of Figure 4.
The gas content of the fluid being pumped from a well m~y vary in an unpredictable manner so that the downward stroke of the pump plunger may jump back and for-th in a random manner b~twc~n the downstrokc cur~.C, 70a - 70e of Figure 4. For example, on one downward stroke the load cell 2~ and the strokc~ transduccr 53 (Fig. 1) may provide the curve 70b, while the next down-stroke develops the curve 70e and the next downstrokedevelops the curve 70c.
When a well is beiny pumped-off the fluid level gradually drops so the pump rod load follows curve 65 ~Fig. 3) on one downstroke, then follows curve 66, then 67, etc. toward curve 69 with the output of the load cell 24 (Fig. 1) gradually moving toward the left on sub-sequent downstrokes, as seen in Figuxe 3. This difference between a leftward trend in fluid pound and a random movement in gas pound can be used to aid in distinguishing between these two conditions.
Details of a method and apparatus for auto-matic calibration of a well and for monitoring operation thereof are disclosed in Figures 6 - 8A and 8B. When Figures 8A, 8B are placed side by-side with leads from the right side of shee-t 8A extending to corresponding leads from the left side of sheet 8B the two sheets com-prise a block diagram of an embodiment of the computers 49a, 49b lFig. 1).
The portion of the computer system disclosed in Figure 8A comprises a motor controller 71 for receiv-ing signals from the load cell 24 and from transducer 53 and for using these signals to determine the sequence for controlling the motor 30. The computer 49b disclosed in Figure 8B comprises a plotter controller 72 for using the load cell and transducer signals transmitted from computer 49a to opexate the XY plotter 59. Signals are interchanged between the motor controller 71 and the plotter controller 72 over the pair of interconnecting wires ~6, 67.
Each of the controllers 71~ 72 includes a central processor 73a, 73b, a programmable interrupt controller 74a, 74b, a programmable peripheral in-ter-fac~ 75a, 75b and a memory decoder 76a, 76b connected for the interchange oE in~ormation and instruct:ions ovcr a system bus 80a, 80b. A central processor 73a, 73b whlch can be used in the present inven~ion is ~he~ mod~l 8088 manufactured by Intel Corporation, Santa Clara, California. A programmable peripheral interface 75a, 75b which can be used is the model 8255A and a programm-able interrupt controller 74a, 74b which can be used is the model 8259A both manufactured by Intel Corpora-tion. An input/output decoder 77a, 77b decodes address signals for selectively enabling the peripheral inter-faces 75a, 75b to send and receive information from the sys~em bus 80a, 80b.
Clock pulses for driving the central processors 73a, 73b are provided by a pair of clock drivers 81a, 81b which are initialized by a pair o "power on reset"
generators 82a, 82b. The generator 82a also incl~des a power fail circuit to warn that power to the controller is failing. A clock driver 81a, 81b which can be used in the present invention is the model 8284A manufactured by Intel Corporation. A pair of indicating de~ices 83a, 83b provide visual display of information from the peripheral interfaces 75a, 75b. The indicating device 83a also includes a plurality of switches for entering information into the motor controller. A pair of timers 84a~ B4b provide timing signals to operate the controllers 74a, 74b and information is transferred between the motor controller 71 and the plotter controller 72 by the pair of universal synchronous asychronous receiver trans-mitters (US~R~s~ 55a, 55b. One such USART which can be used in the present invention is the model 8251A manu factur~d by Intel Corporation. Progxams for operating the motor controller 71 and the plotter controller 72 are stored in a PROM 86a, 86b and data for use in the system is stored in a R~M 87a, 87b. ~ata to be retained 3s during a pow~r failure can be stored in a nonvolatile RAM
85. A load/stroke conditioner 88 (Fig. 8A) amplifies and filters signals transmitted ~rom the load cell 24 and the transducer 53 and sends the smoothed signals to 7~31~

the bus 80a through a mul~iplcxer 89a and thc analo~-Lo-digital converter 48a. A pair of di~:ital-to-analog con~
verter~ 61a, 61b (~i~. 8B) ~rovide analo~ signals to operate the XY plotter 59 in response to digital signals on -the~ system bus 80b. ~ multiplexer 89b and -the analog-to-digital converter 48b provide digital signals which correspond to the X and Y positions o~ the plotter 59~ An analog-to-digital converter which can be used is the model AD574A manufactured by Analog Devices.
The general operation of a first method for detec~ing pump-off using apparatus of the present invention has been described in connection with Figures 1 - 4. A detailed description of the,selection of the set point (Xset, Ysetj and the method of using the motor controller 71 and the plotter controller 72 to determine when the well is in fluid pound will be descxibed in connection with Figures 5 - 22 which provide background of the use of software state machines and of their use in operating the apparatus o Figures 1l 8A and 8B and pro~ides details of the operation cf a computer program in carrying out various operations performed by the computer of Figures 8A, 8B.
The program of the present computer is support-ed by a real time operating system having various rou-tines that are not applications oriented and that aredesigned specifically to support programs designed with the state machine concept, that is, a state, input driven program. Some of th~ routines are sub-routines while others form a module that creates a simple real-time environment under which software state machines can operate. The operating system provides equipment in which a collection of software state machines can operate.
A software state machine is a process that is ~xecuted on $he digital computer each time that a mess-age is sent to the state machine. The process does not execute in exactly the same way each time that a like message is sent to it because the processing to be done 33~3 for any mcssa~e d~p~nds ~n th~ mach:ine'~ "s~a~-e", i e., its memory of all prior processing that it has done in respons~ to the previous messages. The state can bc any length, from eight binary digits to several thousand binary digits depending upon the complexity of a given machine. Given the state of the machine and the current message, the machine will do a given set of processing which is totally predictable. A machine can be repre-sented as a matrix of processes, indexed by a state and a message as shown in Figure 9. For example, if the state machine of Figure 9 receives message number one in ~tate one, then process A will be done. If process A
were to cause the state to be changed to state 2 then a second message number one, coming right after the first message would cause process D to occur which could cause the machine to change to state 3. It is not necessary that a process cause the state to change, although it may do so in many cases.
A software state machine, upon completing its ~0 process defined by the state and by the message returns control to the program that called it, the state machine scheduler which will be descri~ed below. During the given process, the machine is not interrupted in order to giYe processing time to another machine of the same system. Thus, processing time appointment between a given machine and any of its contemporaries in the system is on a message-by-message basis, and such an environment is called a message switched operating system (MSOS). None of the machine's processes are ev~r suspended for the processes of ano~her machine.
For example, if message three comes in state one, pro-cess C will begin and end before another state machine can have the central processing unit (CPU) 73a (Fig. 8A) to respond to its next message in its given stateO
Certain things can cause a state machine pro-cess to "suspend". For example, an asychronous interrupt can be registered and processed. A requirement of the operating environmen-t is that such hardware events are 7~

turned into softwarc messayes to be ~rocesc;cd in ordcr by the responsible state machine. Only tha-t p~ocessiny that must bc donc at ~hc cxact instant ~f thc intc~ru~
i5 done and then the interrupt service process will cause a soEl:ware flag to bc rniscd, ending thc intcrrupt pxo-cess. When the operatiny system notes an asychronous flag (semaphore), it generates the needed software mess-age to be sent to the state machine that will carry out the non~time-critical segment of the interrupt process-ing. An example of such a process is data collection atprecisely timed intervals. When the timer interrupt signals that data must be collected, it is read in the required manner dependent on the type of the data, queued in a storage area for processing at a later time, and a flag is raised. When this raised flag is noted by the operating system, a software message is generated, the data is stored and the state machine that is responsible for the processing of this data receives the message at a later time.
A state machine is not given access to the processor by the opexating system on a regularly timed basis but is connected to the processor only in order for it to process a message. Whenever the processing of a message is completed the state machine must insure that it will get another message at some point in the uture.
This is done in ~he following ways:
1) Another machine sends ~ message for synchronizing purposes.
2) A time period elapses signaled by a timer message.
3) Real-time data becomes available from some queue.
4) An input which is being polled, achieves the desired state, and initiates the software message.
5) An interrupt is sensed and a software mess-age i5 sent to inform the state machine about this event.
The only time that a machine cannot take care of itself is prior to receiving its first message, so the operatln~ system -takcs the responsi~ it~ oL
initiatiny the system by sending to all of the soEtware statc machincs, Eunctionirl~J thereirl, an ini~lali~,incJ
message referred to herein as a "power on" message. No matter what the statc oE ~he machine it will respond with a predetermined given process when this message is re-ceivea independent of the state of the machine.
A convenient means of illustrating the opera-tion of a software state machine is shown in the state machine symbology of Figure 10 using the messages of Figure 9 to do some of the processes and to move into some of the states shown in Figure 9. If we assume the machine (Fig. 10) to be initially in state one, the receipt of message one causes process A to be performed as the transition action for message one received in state one and also causes the machine to move into state two. In state two the receipt of message two causes process E, causes a message to be sent out to another state machine and moves this state machine back into state one. In state one the receipt of message three causes process C as the transition action for receiving message three in state one but does not cause any change in the state of the machine. Some of the other states and processes shown in Figure 9 are not repeated in Figure 10 in order to simplify the drawing.
A message switched operating system of the type shown in Figure 11 includes a main procedure which pro-vides signals to initialize the system through a system initializing procedure and includes the initialization of various interrupts, timers, the scheduler, inputs, data acquisition, the nonvolatile RAMs, the math utility and outputs as well as initializing the available message blocks so that all dynamic memory is put into an avail-able space queue for storin~ data. The procedure then calls the duty cyc~e procedure which sequentially calls the asynchronous processing, state machine scheduler and synchronous processing over and over again. All interrupt programs communicate with the duty cycle r~ro~ram by way of semaphor~s. The duLy cyclc procJr~Jrl runs indefinitely with a state machine message delivery, an asychronous operatioll and all synchronous ol~eraLion~
timed by the xeal-time clock for each cycle of the loop.
Asychronous operations that can occur are: data input frorn a real-time data acquisition queue and communication line intexrupts to move characters in and out o~ the system. In the asychronous operation significant events occurring cause an available message block to be secured and turned into a message to be delivered to whatever state machine is charged with processing the particular interrupt. Since the data is queued at the time of acquisition, the transfer operation is asynchronous. If the data processing falls behind the data input, the sys-system can use the time between synchronous clock ticksto catch up on the required operation. Details of the data flow in the asynchronous processing of the DQ block of Figure 11 are shown in Yigure 13. Signals from the load cell 24 and the stroke transducer 53 (Fig. 13) are acquired by the GET XY data procedure and are transferred into the XY data Q in RAM 87a (Fig. 8A) by the PUT XY Q
procedure in resonse to a real-time clock interrupt and are removed by the GET XY Q procedure.
Once the data has been acquired it is processed by the math utility (at PM, Fig. ll)o The math utility accesses the xaw values of stroke ~X) and load (Y) and smoothes the values of X and Y. The smoothed value of X
(X3 (Fig~ 14) and the smoothed value of Y (Y) are ob-tained by using a moving average smoothing technique where the last n values of X (or Y) received are added and divided by the number of values (n) to obtain a first smoothed value. To obtain the next smoo~hed value, X, the newest value is included in the sum, but the oldest received value is not in~luded.
3~ The first derivative, X' is then computed and X is corrected for the time lag introduced by the com~
putation of the first derivative to obtain the result Xlag. The values of X', Xlag, ~l and Ylag are then sent 7~

to all state machines that have sic~ned uJ? ~or ~hes~
values using the "send message" procedu-r ~Fig. 12) to place the messa~cs on thc queue o~ mcssayoCl to bc delivered.
The first derivative is com~u~ed using a method developed by A. Savitzky and M. Golay and described in detail on pages 1627 - 1638 of the July 1964 issue of "Analytical Chemistry" maga ine. This method uses a least squares quadratic polynominal fit of an odd number of points and a corresponding set of convolution integers ~o evaluate the central point. The derivative computed corresponds to the value at the midpoint of a window of equally spaced observations. The value obtain-ed is identical to the best fit of the observed values to the quadratic polynominal A~X ~ AlX + Ao = y. A2, Al, and Ao are selected such that when each X (for thP number of points in the window) is substituted into this equa-tion, the square of the differences between the computed values, y, and the observed number is a minimum for the total number of observations (window size). Once A2~ A
and Ao are found the central point is evaluated. The Savitzky - Golay method uses a set of convoluting inte-gers and the observed data points to evaluate the central point.
Since the derivative is evaluated at the center of the set of data a lag equal to the (window si~e -1) divided by 2 is introduced. Details of the math utility for obtaining valu~s of X', Xlag, Y' and Y lag are shown in Figure 14.
The synchronous processing performs hardware input polling, timer aging and signal delivery. When an input, requested for polling by any state machine, gets to the desired state such as an off condition, an on con-dition, above a level or below a level, etc. an available message block is sent as a message to the xequesting machine indicating that a given input is in the desired skate. The input will no longer be polled until another request is made.

~19-- , The time~ process is sligh~ly ~ rer,t in that the timer queue is made up oE message blocks serving as receptacles for ~he machine requcstinc~ the m.lrkincJ Or the pas~aye of time and the time of day when the time will be completed. When the time is completed the block is removed from the timer ~ueue and place~ on the message delivery queue as a message. Thus, all responsibilities placed on the state machine are accomplished in the operatlng system by transferring software messages and 0 by the use of real-time flags and queues (semaphores).
The first component of the operating system (Fig. 11) is a program to deliver a message to a state machine (Figs. 11, 12). A message is a small block of dynamic memory that is queued for delivery to a desig-nated state machineO This program is called a statemachine scheduler and shown in detail in Figure 12 selects the next highest priority message from the queues of messages ready for delivery. The machine looks up the designation state machine code stored in the message and uses that code to select the proper state machine program to be called with a pointer to the mess-age block as an input. Contained in the program is a state memory. With the memory ~nd the state the proper process can be delivered and executed, and the memory block transferred from the delivery queue to the avail-able space queue for subsequent reuse. Two examples of data that is reused are instructions for sending the messages or setting timers. These processes take avail-able blocks and turn them into messages that will be on the message delivery queue at some later time. Programs such as the message sender and the timer starter are service utilities called by the state machine in order to fulfill the responsibilities alluded to earlier. The state machine scheduler program is the lowest form of the hierarchy which forms the main duty cycle of the operating system. In the diagram of Figure 11 the rela-tionship of the scheduler to the rest of the operating system is shown.

~2~3~

--~o--When powcr is turned on in ttl~J comL~u~er o~
Figures 8A, 8B, the power on reset generators 82a, 82b provides signals which rese-t various hardware in the com-puter and cause ~he first instruction of the computer program stored in thc P~OM 86a to be exccuted by the central processor 73a. ~ "power on" message is sent, in the manner previously described, to each of ~he state machine modules 91 - 94 (Fig~ 6) in the computer and these state machine modules are initialized. The load signal values from the load cell 24 (Fig. 8A) and the stroke signal values from the transducer 53 are obtained by the processor 73a through conditioner 88 and converter 48a and stored in the RAM 87a (Figs. 8A, 13) for use by the stroke discriminator which uses these signals 'o detect maximum and minimum values of load and rod posi-~ion. The maximum and minimum values of load and rod position are available to other state machine modules upon request.
The stroke discriminator 93 (Fig. 6) provides signals to the 1uid pound detector 92 at the start of the downstroke, at the end of the downstroke and pro-vides peak reports of Xmax, Xmin, Ymax and Ymin and area reportsO Details of the stroke discriminator 93 (Fiy. 6) and its method of operation are disclosed in Figures 15 -22 where curve 104 (Fig. 16) shows a typical raw deriva-tive of the rod string 16 (Fig. 1) position vs. time, and curve 105 shows the smoothed derivative of the same.
An average of several values of the raw derivative from a timed sequence of values are used in obtaining the smoothed derivative thereby causing a lag between the phase o the smoothed derivative and the raw derivative as ~hown in ~i~ure 16~ The lagged smoothed deriv~tive is used by a ~troke derivative detector 109 (Fig. 17) to obtain the maximum and minimum in the stroke value~ Once the max and min values are obtained the system stops looking for another extreme value for a predetermlned "blackout time" to reduce the average real processing time consumption by the stroke derivative detector. The blackout time also makes -the stroke system rnore imrllurled to noise in the data input from the stroke transducer 53 (Fig. l).
There are several software messages that are incoming to the stroke discriminator from the pump-off detection system and from other machines that are not neighbors in the state machine hierarchy. These messages include a "power on" message common to all machines, start and stop messages from other machines which ask for a report of the stroke low point, note of the stroke high point, peak repoxts of X and Y (stroke and load extremes), and area reports. The Xlag, Ylag and X derivative mess-ages are received from the math utili~y.
The stroke discriminator 93 (Fig. 17) communi-cates directly with the pump manager 91 and with thesubservient stroke derivative detector 109, a stroke area calculator 110~ a stroke extremes detector 111 and other state machines 112. The stroke extremes detector 111 uses the raw values of signal from the load cell 24 (Fig.
1) and the position transducer 53 to find the Xmax, Xmin, Ymax and Ymin. The area calculator 110 integrates the area of the dynagraph (Fig. 2), and the stroke discrimi-nator 93 directs the operation of the other s~ate machines 109 - 112 shown in Figure 17.
After the pump manager 91 (Fig. 17) turns on the motor 30 (Fig. 1) a motor on message and a start BDC
(bottom dead center) report message (i.e., a signup for start of downstroke report~ (Fig. 17) are sent to the stroke discriminator 93. The stroke discriminator waits 3 sec~nds to allow the stroke signal to stabilize and sends a start message to the state machines 109 - 111 to monitor the well operation. If a fluid pound is detected during the monitoring operation an alarm signal is sent to the pump manager 91 who turns off the motor and pro-vides a motor off signal to the stroke discriminator.
When the stroke discriminator 93 receives amotor on signal from the pump manager 91, it provides a start signal which causes the stroke derivative detector 3~2~'~831~

-22~

109 to measurc stroke d~riva~ive si~3n~1 nois~ ~JurincJ .l 3 second turn-on delay perlod. At the end of the 3 second delay the derivative detector 109 uses the measured noise and the stroke signals to provide upstroke and downstroke signals until the stroke discriminator 93 sends a stop message to the derivative detector.
The stroke extremes det~ctor 111 (Fig. 17) pro-vides a min stroke position, load at min stroke, max stroke position, load at max stroke; min load, stroke position at min load, max load, and stroke position at max load each time a status request is received from the stroke discriminator 93. At the time the status request is received a reset occurs and the calculation of a new set of extreme values is started. This process continues until a stop signal is received by the stroke extremes detector 111 from ~he stroke discriminator 93.
When the stroke area calcwlator 110 (Fig. 17) receives a start signal from the stroke discriminator 93 the area calculator receives downside and extreme reports which are used to calculate area of the dynagraph (Fig.
2). The calculated value of the area is sent from the area calculator 110 to the stroke discriminator 93 in response to a status-request signal.
When a power on signal is received by the stroke discriminator (at A, Fig. 18) its memory is initialized and mailing lists of the the state machines which want to receive reports are prepared. When the motor on signal at B is received from the pump manager the stroke discriminator (Fig. 18) moves from the motor off state to the motor starting state, starts a 3 second timer and sends a start X' noise measure message to the derivati~e detector to start its measurement of the noise on the stroke derivative during this 3 second period. When the 3 second motor on delay timer has expired (at C~ the derivativ~ detector 109 (Fig. 17), stroke area calculator 110 and stroke extremes detector 111 receive start mess-ages and the BDC count is set to zero. The BDC position is the bottom dead center of the lef~ end of the walking beam 22 (~ig. l) and corr~sponds to the star-~ of ~hc downstroke of the suc~er rod string 16. A start report signal ~at G, Fig. 18) Erom any of th~ statc machincs places the requesting machine on the specified mailiny list if it is not already there. A stop report signal (at F) from any of the state machines removes the re-questing machine from the specified mailiny list.
When an upside signal (at H, Fig. l3) is re-ceived from the derivative detector, in the motor on state, if the BDC count is less than 2 the BDC count is incremented. A status request is sent to the extremes detector lll (Fig. l7~ and a BDC report is sent to all machines who have signed up via a start BDC repor~ mess-age as pxeviously noted. When a downside signal (I, Fig. 18) is received from the derivative detector in the motor on state a TDC or top dead center relative to the outer end of the walking beam report is sent to all who have signed up for such ~ report. A downside message is also sent to the stroke area calculator llO (Fig. 17).
When an extremes message (J, Fig. 18) is received from the stroke extremes detector lll (Fig. 17) in the motor on state an extremes message is sent to the stroke area calculator, a status request is sent to the stroke area calcula or, and a peak report is sent to all of the state machines who have signed up if the BDC count is at least 2. When an area report ~at K, Fig. 18) is re-ceivPd from khe area calculator in the motor on state an area report is sent to all state machines who have signed up if the BDC count is at least 2.
The stroke derivative detector lO9 ~Fig. 17) identifies the maximum and minimum stroke positions by using the zero crossing of the first derivative of the stroke signal ~Fig. lS) from the stroke transducer 53 (Fig. l). The first step in the operation is to deter-mine a dead band or noise band about the æero crossing value (X' = 0) as seen in ~igures 15 and 16. A noise value "d" i5 a maximum difference between X' from the math utility and the X' smoothed by a fifteen point ~23iL71~

moving average, dctectcd durinc1 ~he 3 ~-;ccond morlitor period and oorrected for phase shift. The noise band is uscd to declare that a top dead center (TDC) position has been reached when X' is greater than ~d and a bottom dead center (BDC) position has been reached when X' is less than -d. The operation of the stroke derivative d~tector 109 (Fig. 17) is disclosed in detail in the state diagram of ~iyure 19. When the system provides a power on signal (at A, Fig. 19) the derivative detec~or is initiali~ed and requests a report of X t from the math utility 94 (Fig. 6). The derivative de-tector also sets a blackout timer to 2 seconds. At this point a sub-sequent start X' noise measurement signal from the stroke discriminator starts the derivative de~ector (at B, Fig. 19). A fifteen point moving average smooth of X' is initiated with the last previous value of the derivative used as a starting value and with the maximum noise set to a value of zero.
The start X' noise measurement message signal (at B, Fig. 19) moves the derivative detector into the X' noise monitor sta~e (2). When a X value is received from the math utility it is smoothed. The absolute value of the difference between the smoothed and the raw values of X' is then computed. If this value is greater than the maximum noise value then the maximum noise is set to this value. When a start signal is received from the stroke discriminator (at E, Fig. 19) indicating that the 3 second noise measurement period is over, the X' zero noise band is set (Figs. 15 and 16). The maximum noise value is then increased by a 10% safety margin and -d is set to -max noise and +d is set to +max noise (Fig.
16).
I the last X' value received is greater than æero then the increasing state is entered. If, however, the last X value is less than zero~ then the decreasing state is entered. The derivative detector now monitors the X' values in ordex to d~tect the top and bottom of the stroke (Fig. 15).

-25~

The operation Eor the detcction of thc st~lrt of the upstroke (state ~ to 5 to B to 4, Fig. 19) is the same (except Eor the sense oE directiorl) ac, -the operation for the detection of the star-t of the down-stroke which yoes rom state 4 to 6 to 7 to 3 so only theone detection operations will be discussed herein.
When the stroke derivative detector is in the decreasing state (3, Fig. 19) and a X' value is received from the math utility the X' value is checked against the uppex end of the noise band ~d. If the X' value is less than ~d then no action is taken and the stroke discrimi-nator detector remains in state 3. However, if X' is greater than ~d then the signal has gone through the zero X' band in an increasing direction and therefore may have detected the negative position peak (TDC or end of downstroke and start of upstroke). However, it is possi-bl that noise has caused a false detection, therefore a 3 point timer (time needed to acquire 3 data points at the data acquisition rate) is started and state 5 ~Fig.
19) is entered. X' values are recorded in this state dur-ing the time required to collect the 3 points of data.
When this time has expired X' is again compared to ~d and if X' is less than +d a noise glitch has occurred. The zero noise band between +d and ~d is increased by 10% or by a count of one, whichever is greater, and the stroke discriminator detector returns to state 3. If, however, X' is greater than the value d a negative position peak has been detected. A blackout timer is started, state 8 is entered and a downstroke message is sent to the stroke discriminator 93 tFig. 17). During the blackout time X' is not checked. BPcause of the cyclical nature of the pump stroke another peak is not expected until a known minimum time has passed. The use of the blackout time improves the noise immunity of the detector. When the blackout time has expired, Xl math flow is started again, the increasing state (4) is entered and the system looks for the positive position peak. The process is the same as above except for the sense of the ~73~

com~arisorl as not~d 1~er~inbe-~ore.
Details of the stroke extremes detector 111 (r~ 17) which dctcc~s Xmax, Xmin, ~max and Ylnirl values, i5 shown in the stroke extremes detector state di.agram oE Figure 20. When power is -turned on -the stroke extremes detector moves into the idle state (1, Fig. 20).
In response to a start signal (at B) from the stroke discriminator 93 (Fig. 17) the values Xlag and Ylag math flow are started and the extremes are initialized. In initializing the stroke extremes, Xmin is set to the maximum positive value used in the detector, Y at Xmin is set to the value of zero, Xmax is set to zero and Y at Xmax is set to a value of zero.
I'he stroke extremes detector ~at C, Fig. 20) uses the Xlag 5ignal from the math utility 94 (Fig. 6) to calculate updated values of Xmax and Xmin and uses the Ylag signals (at D, Fig. 20) to calculate the updated values of Ymax and Ymin. The updated values of maximum and minimum for X and Y are calculated as follows. If X received is greater than Xmax then Xmax is set to the X value received and Y at Xmax is set to the correspond-iny Y value~ The same procedure is done for Ymax. I-f X received is less than Xmin then Xmin is set to the X
value received and Y at Xmin is set to *he corresponding Y value and the same procedure is followed for Ymin.
These values are sent to the stroke discriminator 93 (Fig. 6) in response to a status request (at E, Fig.
20) and the extremes are then initialized.
The stroke area detector 110 ~Fig. 17) cal-culates the total dynagraph card area (Fig. 2) under thedirection of the stroke discriminator 93~ When a power on message is received (at A, Fig. 21) the status report total curve area is set to a value of zero. When a start message is received from the stroke discximinator the stroke area calculator moves to the "wait for first report state". When a start of upstroke (D) or start of downstroke report (C) is received in the wai-t for first report state, the appropriate state either 3 or 4 is cntered an~ thc paraln~ters are initi,~ d. '~'J~ uErer index (Fig. 22) and the total area are both set to an initial valuc of ~ero and the math flow is startc~. ~s the Ylag (load) values are received, these values are processed in thc manncr determined by ~he area calculator state (upstroke or downs-troke).
Details of the method and apparatus for cal-culating the total area of the dynagraph are illustrated in Fiyure 22 where the load values Ul - Un are sampled at regular intervals during the upstroke and stored in memory positions Ml - Mn of a load buffer LBl. At the start of each upstroke (Fig. 22) an index Il is set to zero so it points to memory position Ml of buffer LBl in the RAM 87a (FigO BA) and the tota~. area is set to zero.
At regular intervals on the upstroke each of the load values Ul - Un are sampled and placed in one of the memory positions Ml - Mn of buffer LBl under the direc-tion of the index Il. The index is then incremented to the next position.
On the downstroke as each of the new valwes is received, the index Il is decremented, each of the lower load values Ln - Ll is subtracted from the corresponding upper load values Un - Ul J stored in buffer LBl and the difference values are used to calculate the area of the dynagraph by slicing the dynagraph into small vertical strips, calculating the area of each strip and adding these strip areas to obtain the total area. For example, the lower load value L14 (Fig. 22) is subtracted from the corresponding upper load value U14 and multiplied by the width between boundaries B13 and B14 to obtain the area oE the strip A14. Since only the relative areas of the dynagraph between different well conditions are needed the width of each strip can be assumed to have ~he value of 1, even though the widths of the strips vary from one portion of the dynagraph to another. Each strip, such as strip A14 has substantially the same width each time the load values are sampled~
The area strips (Fig. 22) are shown as being 12~783B

~28-relatively wid~ to simpl;y -the diacJr~ , b~L ;~ ater number o~ load samples, resultiny in narrower strips, can bc used to increasc ~hc accuracy o~ thc calculations.
When a strip width of one is assumed it is necessary to merely subtract cach load value Ll - Ln ~rom ~he corres-ponding load value U1 - Un to obtain the area of each strip.
The power on message causes the pump manager software state machine module 91 (Fig. 6) to provide power to the pump motor 30 (Fig. 8A) through interface 75a and a motor relay 98. A "power on" messa~e to the set point detector (Fig. 7) moves this state machine into the "motor wait" state. The motor 30 moves the sucker-rod string 16 (Fig. l) through a predetermined number of start up ignore cycles to allow the fluid level in the well to tabiliæe, then the pump manager module 91 (Fig.
6) sends a "motor on" message to the fluid pound detector 92 which moves the set point detector (Fig. 7) from the "motor wait" state to the calibration state.
At this transition a set of four smoothing buffers (not shown) in the RAM 87a (Fig. 8A) are initialized for re-ceiving values of Xmax, Xmin, Ymax and Ymin for smooth-ing r and the calibration cycle count is set to zero.
The stroke discriminator 93 (Fig. 6) sends a peak report and an area report to the fluid pound de-tector 92 at the start of each downstroke. The peak re-port contains values of Xmax, Xmin, Ymax and YminO The present invention uses four consecutive cycles of pump operation to obtain smoothed values of the peak values Xmax, Xmin, Ymax and ~min, although a greater or lesser number of cycles can be used. When an area report is xeceived ~at F, Fig. 7) the area is compared with a pre-viously computed area which is stored in the nonvolatile RAM 85 (Fig. 8A).
If the newly computed curve area is equal to or greater than 80~ of the previous area, the values of Xset-and Yset ~Fig. 2~ are computed using the latest smoothed values of Xmax, Xmin, Ymax, Ymin and the latest operator entered values oE X~ and Y~ in th~ formulae:
Xset = (~max - Xmin) (X% - 100) ~ Xmin Yset = (Ymax - Ymin) (~% ~ 1~0) ~ Ymirl All values of Xset, Yset, Xmax, Xmin, Ymax, Ymin and the dynagraph calibration (card) area are stored in ~M 85 (Fig. 8A) in the event that the area test fall5 below 80'~
at a later time. When the calibration count reaches a value of four and the area test has exceeded the 80% test on each of the four cycles the monitor period is started on the next downstroke of the pump rod 16 (Figs. 1, 7).
If the newly computed curve area is less -than 80~ of the previous area, the previous values of Xmax, Xmin, Ymax and Ymin are retrieved from their stored posi-tion in the RAM 87a (Fig. 8A) and used to calculate the values of Xset and Yset (Fig. 2). When Xset and Yset have been obtained, the monitor period (Fig. 7) is start-ed on the next downstroke of the pump rod 28 (Fig. 1) because calibration is not recommended when the area of the dynagraph is reduced.
The above calibration technique permits tne set point (Xset, Yset) to be updated to follow slowly changing well conditions, such as a change in fluid level due to water flooding, but prevents the set point from changing due to a pump proble~ or to a high fluid level resulting from a power outage or from workover of the well. Any sudden change in area of the dynagraph curve would probably be due to pump-off or to pump problems which could further damagP pump equipment and such sudden changes should be detected as problems. These problems might not be detected i th~ set point (Xset, Yset) changed positions relative to the dynagraph.
After the set point detector (Fig. 6) has cali-brated itself/ it begins to monitor the well for fluid pound during the pump downstroke using the stroke (Xlag) and the load (Ylag) values received from the math utility 94. A5 each current value ~Xc, Yc) is received the las-t previous value Xl, Yl is stored in the RAM 87a (Fig. 8~) and these values Xc, Xl, Yc, Yl are used to interpolate the values betweerl mor~itored r~oints (~ y. 5) t~, >I;tc~ir~
true value oE Y at Xset. This is necessary as the periodic time sampled checkiny of the values o~ X and Y
may not obtain a reading exactly at the point Xset. When a current value of X is less than Xset (rigs. 2 - 5) the next value of Y (Yc) is used with the previous Y value (Yl) to obtain a value of Y at Xset. If Y at Xset is greater than the value Yset (Fig. 2) a violation count is incremented. When the violation count reaches a pre-determined number, a "pump-off detected" signal is sent to the pump manager 91 (Fig. 6).
When the calculated value of Y at Xset is less than or equal to Yset ~he violation count is set to zero to insure that a specific number of consecutive viola-tions are obtained before the pump-off detected signal is sent ~o the pump manager (Fig. 6).
A second method ~ using the apparatus of Figures 1, 8A, 8B for detecting p~mp-off is disclosed in the message flow diagrams of Figures 23 and 24 and in the load curve of Figure ~S. The slope of the load curve between the upper rod string position Xmax and the lower rod string position Xmin is monitored and the position at which the slope of the load curve has the greatest nega tive value, X(Ypmin) is calculated for each cycle of operation. The direction of movement of this point X(Ypmin) is used to detect fluid pound. As the fluid level in a well decreases, the point X(Ypmin) progressive-ly moves from point X(Ypmin 1) of Figure 25 to X(YImin 2) toward point X~Y'min 5). A value of X, called Xset, can be selected and when the point X(YImin) reaches Xset the motor 30 (Fig. 1) is shut down.
The value Xset is calculated in computer 49a ~Fig. 1) by first calculating a value Xav which is an average value of X at which X(Y'min) is positioned when the well is filled with fluid. A human operator uses a keyboard ~0 (Figs. 1, 8B) or other input to the computer 49 (Fig. 1) to enter a sensitivity value (percentage~
which causes the computer 49 to calculate an Xset value a prcde~rmined ~erce~t of ~tll~ dis~an~ t~!Lweell Y~ Llrld Xav (Fig. 25). If the characteristics of the well or i-ts pum~, etc. should change so the curve o~ igurc 25 changes the computer can be used to recalculate the posi-5 tion of the set po.int Xset.
When the set point Xset has been selected the computer continually monitors the value X(YImin) of the curve (Fig. 25) until X(Y'min) reaches ~he value of Xset as the curve moves from Xmax ~oward Xmin. If the value of X(Y'min) is less than the value of Xset the computer 49a (Fig. 1) provides a signal which causes the motor 30 to stop and the well is shut down. To insure that the well is really pumped-off at this time, it may be desir-able to use the average value of X(Y'min) computed over several pumping cycles and to allow the pump to move through two or more cycles with the curve (Fig. 25) to the left of the set point each time, before the motor 30 is turned off. This prevents shut down of the well due to an erratic signal from the load cell 24 or from the transducer 53 or from other electronic equipment or of the well itself.
The operation to detect pump-off using the posit.ion of the maximum slope of the load curve is initiated by the power on reset genera~ors 82a, 82b that provide signals which reset various hardware in the com-puter and cause the instruction of the computer program stored in the P~OM 86a to be executed by the central processor 73a. A "power on" message is sent to each of the state machine modules 91 - 94 (Fig. 23) in the com-puter and these sta~e machine modules are initialized with the fluid pound detector 92 (Fig. 23) going into a motor wait state (Fig. 24).
The power on message causes the pump manager module 91 (Fig. 23) to provide power to the pump motor 30 (Fig. 8A) through a motor relay 98. The motor 30 moves the sucker-rod string 16 (Fig. 1) through a predetermined number of cycles to allow the fluid level in the well to stabili~e, then the pump manager module 91 (~ig. 23) 3~
. , sends a "motor on" mes.sacJe ~o the ~luid p~un~ de~ector module 92.
'rhe fluid pound detector is 5C' t in -th~ rnonitor mode (~ig. 24~ where it retrieves the current average value of X (Xav), at the point X(Y'min) (Fig. 25) where the maximum negative slope of the well characteristic curve occurs. This valu~ of Xav is retrieved from a nonvolatile memory used to prevent loss of data if power should be lost in the computer. Prior to the first cycle of calibration ~he value of Xav is zero. A calibra.e button 100 (Figs~ 8B, 9) is armed so that calibration will start when the button is pressed, the cycle count is set to zero, the slope Y'min is set to a value of -1, and Xav at Y'min i~ set to a value of zero. At the start of the next downstroke the fluid pound detector 92 r~-ceives the value Xmin (Fig. 25) from the stroke dis criminator 93 (Fig. 23). If Xav is zero, then Xset is set to zero, otherwise the value of Xset is computed from the following formula:
Xset = (100 - X%) (Xav - Xmin) + Xmin, where X% is a percentage value bet-~een zero and 100 is selected by a human operator.
Xav is the average value of X where the slope Ypmin of the curve has a maximum negative value.
Xmin is the minimum position of the rod string.
The cycle count is incremented.
When the calibrate button 100 (Figs. 23, 8B) is pressed, the mode is set to calibrate and the cycle count is set to zero (Fig. ~4). At the start of each down-stroke the value o~ Ypmin is set at -1. During the down-stroke, values of slope of the curve, Y', are received by the fluid pound detector 92 (Fig. 23) from the ma-th utility as previously described and compared wi~h the mos~ negative value of slope previously determined during the current downstroke. If the slope is more negative than the previously determined value the old value of Y' is replaced with the new Y', and the value of X where this more negative slope occurs X(Y'min) is saved and averaged with the pre~vious values to obt~l:Ln a Va1Ue 0 Xav. At the end of the downstroke the cycle count is incremented. When ~ prcdetermined numbcr of v~lucs o~ X
at Y'min have been used to calculate an average, i.e., when the cycle count has reached the d~sired number of calibration cycles, the value of Xav is stored in a non-volatile memory and the mode is set to monitor. This calibration occurs in the downstroke-upstroke loop 101 (FigO 24). The value of Xset is recomputed using the Xav value just determined, the received value of Xmin and the X% as described above.
In the monitor mode the value of Y'min is initialized to -1 at the start of each downstroke. The values of the slope of the curve Y' are received and com-pared a5 before, to the most negative value of the slopepreviously received during the curren~ downstroke. If the slope is more negative than the previously determined value the old value of Y' is replaced with the new Y', and the value of X where this more negative slope occurs, X~Y'min) is saved and averaged with the previous values to obtain a value of Xav. During the monitor mode Xav is averay d over a specified number of fluid pound sensitivi~y cycles rat-her than over calibration cycles as before. If the average X value at the point of most negative slope, Xav is less than Xset the fluid pound detector 92 (Figs. ~3, 24) sends a fluid pound message to the pump manager 91 and the motor 30 (Fig. 1) is disabled.
The present invention uses the position of the most negative slope of ~he sucker-rod position/sucker-rod load curve to determine when fluid pound is present in a subterranean well. The negative slope of the curve is calculated on the downstroke of the sucker-rod and the rod position at the position where the slope of the load change is maximum is compared to a reference position of the suckex-rod established during a calibration period.
If the actual rod position at the point of most negative slope is below the reference position the well pumpiny unit is stopped.

~%~71~31~

~3~-~ ~hixd mc~ho(l of usinc~ the ~ a~,Jtus ol Figures 1, 8A, 8B for detectiny pump-off is disclosed in the message flow diagrams of Figures 28 - 30, in the loa~
curve of Figure 27 and in the calibration diagram of Figure 26. The minimum value of load on the rod string Ymin is monitored and the direction of movement of Ymin is used to detect fluid pound. ~s the fluid level in a well decreases, the position of the minimum load, X(Ymin) progressively moves from point X(Ylmin) (Fig. 27) to point X(Y2min) toward point X(Y5min). This progressive move-ment is detected by the apparatus of Figures 8A, 8B and when the movement has progressed over a predetermined amount a 1uid pound signal is generated. A value of X, called Xset can be selected and when X(Ymin) reaches Xset the motor 30 (Fig. 1) is shut down.
The value Xset is calculated in computer 49a (Fig. 1) by first calculating a smoothed (average) value of X at which Ymin occurs, X(Ymin), when the well is filled with fluid. A human operator uses a keyboard 99 (Fig. 8B) or other input to the computer to enter a sensitivity value (percen-tage) which causes the computer 49a to calculate an Xset value a predetermined percent of the distance between Xmin and Xmax (Fig. 27). If the characteristics of the well or its pump, etc. should change so the curve of Figure 23 changes the computer can recalculate the position of the set point Xset.
When the set point, Xset has been selected the computer continually monitors the value X(Ymin) of the curve (Fig. 23), a smoothed value is calculated and the direction of movement of the value of X(Ymin) is ob~
served. If the value of X(Ymin) is less than the value oE Xset and if the value of X(Ymin) is moving in a negative dire~tion ~toward the left in Fig. 23) the computer 49 (Fig. 1) provides a signal which causes the motor 30 to ~top and the well is shut down.
The opexation to detect pump-off using the trend of movement of the minimum point on the load curve is initiated by the power-on-reset generators 82a, ~2~831~

. . .

82b (~i~s. 8A, 8~) ~lnl~ r)rov:ide sicJnal~ wllic}l r~ t various hardware in the cornputer and cause the instruc-tion oE the computer Ijroyram stored in the PROM 86a to be executed by the entral processor 73a. A "power on"
messaye is sent to each of the state machine modules 91, 93, 940 116/ and 117 (Fig. 28) in the computer and these state machine modules are initialized. The load signal values from the load cell 24 (Fig. 8A) and the stroke signal values from the transducer 53 are obtained from the math utility.
The power on message causes the trend detec-tor supervisor 116 (Figs. 28, 29) to be set in the 'start wait" state, the min position monitor 117 (Figs. 28, 29) to be set in the "command wait" state and causes an X%
value to be sent to the min position monitor. The power on message causes the pump manager module 91 (Fig. 28) to provide power to the pump motor 30 (Fig. 8A) through a motor relay 98. The motor 30 moves the sucker-rod string 16 (Fig. 1) throl~gh a predetermined number of cycles to allow the fluid level in the well to stabilize, then the pump manager module 91 (Fig. 28) sends a "motor on" mess-age to the trend detector supervisor 116 causing the supervisor (Fig. 28) to move into the downstroke wait state.
On the start of the next downstroke a "start calibration" message (Figs. 28, 29) is sent to the min position monitor 117 and the cycle count is set to zero.
When the min position monitor (Fig. 30) receives the start calibra~ion message it waits for a peak report from ~the stroke discriminator 93 (Fig. 28). The peak report which occurs at the start of the downstroke includes values of Xmax, Xmin, and X(Ymin), (Figs. 27, 28). When the ~irst peak report is received (at A, Fig. 30) min' max is set to a value of zero and min' min is set to a value of 1. On subsequent reports durin~ the calibra-tion (at B) these values are ~ent to the math utility 94 (Fig. 28) which provides a moving average smoothed values of Xmin and provides a first derivative of the ~71~
. . .

smooth valuc of Xmin Thc v~lue oE -the ~ir~t deriv~ Jc~
of the smooth value of Xmin is now referred to as min' and is comparcd to mirl' max and m:in' min ~ I~ tll~
current value of min' min is greater than min' max then min' max is set to the current value o~ rnln ' . I~ the current value of min' is less than min' min, then min' min is set to the current value of min'. Min' max and min' mim are actual boundaries of a noise band around the value of the derivative. A constant, K, is chosen and multiplied times the value of min' max and the value of min' min to establish a pair of zero band boundaries ~Fig. 26) called min' high and min' low. No trend in the value o~ X(Ymin) is indicated within this band.
In the calibration at the start of each down-stroke the trend detector supervisor (Fig. 29) increments the number of calibration cycles until the number of cycles is greater than the number of calibration cycles needed. When the number of calibration cycles exceeds the number of needed calibration cycles, a stop calibration message is sent from the trend detector supervisor 116 (Fig. 28) to the min position monitor 117. The min posi-tion monitor sets the min' zero band (Fig. 26), to a value where min' high is equal to X times the min' max value and the min' low is equal to K times the min' min value and Xset is = X(Ymin) -X% (Xmax -Xmin) and the min position monitor returns to the command wait state (Fig.
30) until it receives a start monitor message from the trend detector supervisor 116 (Fig. 28).
When the trend detector 116 (Fig. 28) sends a start monitor message to the min position monitor 117 the trend detector supervisor moves in one of two direc-tions along the state diagram of Figure 29. If this is the first time the pump motor has been turned on in the present sequence, the trend detector supervisor takes the 35 route of steps 1, 2, 3, 4 (Fig. 29) through the down-stroke wait state, to the calibration wait state on the downstroke of the rod string~ The min position monitor (Fig. 30) moves into the monitor peak wait state. When the min position monitor receives a peak report contair,~
ing X(Ymin), the monitor 117 (Figs. 28, 30) calls the math utility 94 to provide a smooth moving averaged value of X(Ymin) and a first derivative of the smooth value X(Ymin). The min position monitor (Fig. 30) then moves to the monitor state.
In the monitor state, the min position monitor receives a new peak report at the start of each downstroke. This report includes the current values of the stroke position at minimum load, X(Ymin). If the current dexivative is less than the zero band of Figure 26 indicating a negative trend of X(Ymin), and if the current stroke position of the minimum load is less than Xset, then fluid pound is indicated using the following procedure: the min posi~ion monitor 117 (Fig. 28) receives the current values of Xmin, Xmax, and X(Ymin).
The monitor 117 sends the values of X(Ymin) to the math utility 94 (Fig. 28) for smoothing and receives the smoothed value of X(Ymin~. The monitor 117 then sends the smoothed value X(Ymin) to the math utility 94 and receives a smoothed value of X(Ymin) = min'. If min' is less than min' low (Fig. 26) and X(Ymin) (Fig. 27) is less than Xset then a "fluid pound detected" message is sent to the supervisor 116 (Figs. 28, 29) and to the pump manager 92. The pump manager turns off the pump motor and the supervisor tells the min position monitor 117 to stop monitoring.
When the pump motor 30 (Figs. 1, 8A) is again turned on the trend detector takes the route of steps 1, 5, 4 (Fig. 29) and eliminates the calibration portion of the state diagram of Figure 29. If desired, calibration can also be pPrformed at the start of each pumping episode by tracing the route 1, 2, 3, 4.
Although the best mode contemplated for carr~-ing out the present invention has been herein shown anddescribed, it will be apparent that modification and variation may be made without departing from what is re-garded to be the subject matter of the invention.
LBG:smb

Claims (31)

THE EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION IN WHICH AN EXCLUSIVE
PROPERTY OR PRIVILEGE IS CLAIMED ARE DEFINED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Apparatus for monitoring the operation of a well pumping unit having a sucker rod siring and a power unit to reciprocate said rod string to produce fluid from an underground location said apparatus comprising:
first transducer means for generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
second transducer means for generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
means for using a maximum value and a minimum value of said load signal to establish a selected value corresponding to said load signal, and for using a maximum and a minimum value of said rod signal to establish a reference position of said rod string;
means for periodically updating said selected value by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal to obtain an updated selected value;
means for periodically updating said reference position by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal to obtain an updated reference position; and means for disabling said power unit when said value corresponding to said load signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference position.
2. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 1, wherein said reference position is on a downward stroke of said rod string.
3. Apparatus for monitoring the operation of a well pumping unit having a sucker-rod string and a power unit to reciprocate said rod string to produce fluid from an underground location, said apparatus comprising:
first transducer means for generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
second transducer means for generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
means for using a maximum value and a minimum value of said load signal to establish a selected value corresponding to said load signal, and for using a maximum value and a minimum value of said rod signal to establish a reference position of said rod string;
means for periodically updating said selected value by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal to obtain an updated selected value;
means for periodically updating said reference position by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal to obtain an updated reference position;
means for monitoring said load signal when said rod string reaches said updated reference position; and means for disabling said power unit when said value corresponding to said load signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference position.
4. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 3, wherein said said reference position is on a downward stroke of said rod string.
5. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 3, wherein said power unit is disabled after said load signal exceeds said updated selected value a predetermined number of consecutive times at said updated reference position.
6. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 3, including input means for entering a percent value of said rod signal and means for using said percent value in establishing said reference position of said rod string, said reference position changing due to a gradual change in the value of said rod signal.
7. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 3, including means for entering a percent value of said load signal and means for using said percent value in establishing said selected value of said load, said selected value changing due to a gradual change in the value of said load signal.
8. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 3, including input means for entering a percent value of X
and a percent value of Y into said updating means, where the percent value of X is a predetermined percentage of the difference between a minimum value and a maximum value of said rod string position, and where the percent value of Y is a predetermined percentage of the difference between a minimum value and a maximum value of said loan signal, and means for using said X percent and said Y
percent values to establish said reference position of said rod string and of said selected value of said load signal.
9. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 3, wherein said updating means uses at least one maximum value of said load signal and at least one minimum value of said load signal to establish said selected value of said load signal.
10. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 9, wherein said power unit is disabled after said load signal exceeds said selected value a predetermined number of times at said reference position within a predetermined duration of time.
11. Apparatus for monitoring the operation of a well pumping unit having a sucker-rod string and a power unit to reciprocate said rod string to produce fluid from an underground location, said apparatus comprising:
first transducer means for generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
second transducer means for generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
a graph plotter for using said load signal and said position signal to produce a graph of rod string load vs.
rod string position;
means for entering a selected value corresponding to said load signal and a reference position of said rod string as a set point on said graph;
means for periodically updating said selected value of said load signal by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal to obtain an updated selected value;
means for periodically updating said reference position by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal to obtain an updated reference position;
means for monitoring said load signal when said rod string reaches said updated reference position; and means for disabling said power unit when said load signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference position.
12. Apparatus for monitoring as defined in claim 11, including means for a human operator to enter said set point on said graph in response to a visual observation of said graph.
13. A method of monitoring the operation of an underground well pumping unit, said unit having a sucker-rod string, means to reciprocate said string to pump fluid, means for generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string, and means for generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string, said method comprises the steps of:
using said load signal to establish a selected value corresponding to said load signal;
using said rod string position signal to establish a reference position of said rod string;
updating said selected value periodically by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal;
updating said reference position periodically by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal; and stopping said pumping unit when said value corresponding to said signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference position.
14. A method of monitoring the operation of an underground well pumping unit, said unit having a sucker-rod string, means to reciprocate said string to pump fluid, means for generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string, and means for generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string, said method comprising the steps of:
using a load signal to establish a selected value corresponding to said load signal;
using said rod string position signal to establish a reference position of said rod string;
updating said selected value periodically by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal;
updating said reference position periodically by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal;
monitoring said load signal when said rod string reaches said updated reference position; and stopping said pumping unit when said value corresponding to said signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference position.
15. A method of monitoring the operation of an underground well pumping unit, said unit having a sucker-rod string and means to reciprocate said string to pump fluid, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
using said load signal to establish a selected value corresponding to said load signal;
using said string position signal to establish a reference position of said rod string;
updating said selected value periodically by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal;
updating said reference position periodically by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal;
monitoring said load signal when said rod string reaches said updated reference position; and stopping said pumping unit when said value corresponding to said load signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference position.
16. A method as defined in claim 15, wherein said step of stopping said pumping unit includes the steps of checking the number of times said load signal exceeds said updated selected value and disabling said pumping unit after said load signal exceeds said updated selected value a predetermined number of times.
17. A method as defined in claim 15, wherein said step of using said string position signal to establish a reference position includes the steps of checking the direction of movement of said rod string and selecting said reference position on a downward stroke of said rod string.
18. A method as defined in claim 15, wherein said step of using said load signal to establish a selected value includes the step of using a pair of values of said load signal to determine said selected value, and said step of using said string position signal to establish a reference position includes the step of using a pair of values of said string position signals to determine said reference position.
19. A method as defined in claim 15, wherein said steps of using said load signal to establish a selected value and using said string position signal to establish a reference position includes the step of having a human operator select said reference position and select said selected value in response to an observation of said load signal and of said string positions.
20. A method for monitoring the operation of an underground well pumping unit, said unit having a sucker-rod string and means to reciprocate said rod string to pump fluid, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;

using a maximum value and a minimum value of said load signal to establish a selected value of said load signal;
using a maximum value and a minimum value of said string position to establish a reference position of said rod string;
updating said selected value periodically by combining an updated maximum load signal with a previous maximum load signal and combining an updated minimum load signal with a previous minimum load signal;
updating said reference position periodically by combining an updated maximum rod position signal with a previous maximum rod position signal and combining an updated minimum rod position signal with a previous minimum rod position signal;
monitoring said load signal when said rod string reaches said updated reference position; and stopping said pumping unit when said load signal exceeds said updated selected value with said rod string at said updated reference position.
21. A method as defined in claim 20 wherein said step of stopping said pumping unit includes the steps of checking the number of times said load signal exceeds said updated selected value and disabling said pumping unit after said load signal exceeds said updated selected value a predetermined number of times.
22. A method as defined in claim 20, wherein said step of using a maximum value and a minimum value of said string position to establish a reference position includes the steps of checking the direction of movement of said rod string and selecting said reference position on a downward stroke of said rod string.
23. A method as defined in claim 20, wherein said step of using a maximum value and a minimum value to establish a selected value includes the step of selecting a value a predetermined percent between said minimum and said maximum values, and wherein said step of using a maximum value and a minimum value to establish a reference position includes the step of selecting a position a predetermined percent of the distance between said minimum and said maximum value.
24. A method as defined in claim 20, wherein said steps of using a maximum value and a minimum value to establish a selected value of said load signal and using a maximum value and a minimum value to establish a reference position includes the step of having a human operator select said reference position and select said selected value in response to an observation of said load signal and of said string positions.
25. A method as defined in claim 20, wherein said step of using a maximum value and a minimum value to establish a selected value of said load signal includes the step of having a human operator select a signal value as a percent of the difference between said minimum value and said maximum value of said load signal and said step of using a maximum value and a minimum value of said string position includes the step of having said human operator select said reference position as a percent of the difference between said minimum value and said maximum value of said rod string position.
26. A method of monitoring the operation of an underground well pumping unit, said unit having a sucker-rod string and means to reciprocate said rod string to pump fluid from a well, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
using said load signal to establish the rate of change in said load on said rod string as said rod string moves in a downward direction;

selecting an average position of said rod string when said rate of change in said load has a maximum value with fluid filling said pumping unit;
using said average rod string position and a minimum rod string position to determine a reference position of said rod string; and stopping said pumping unit when said rod string position is below said reference position at the time said rate of change of load has a maximum value.
27. A method for monitoring the operation of an underground well pumping unit, said unit having a sucker-rod string and means to reciprocate said rod string to pump fluid from a well, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
using said string position to establish a reference position of said rod string;
using said load signals and said position signals to determine the position of said rod string when said load signal has a minimum value;
monitoring the trend of movement of said rod position at said minimum load signal; and stopping said pumping unit when said rod position progressively moves downward at successive minimum load positions, to a position below said reference position.
28. A method of monitoring as defined in claim 27, wherein said step of using said string position to establish a reference position includes the step of selecting a position a predetermined percent of the distance between a minimum rod string position and a position of said rod string when said load signal has a minimum value with said well filled with fluid.
29. A method of monitoring as defined in claim 28, wherein said step of selecting a position includes having a human operator select said predetermined percent of said distance.
30. A method of monitoring the operation of an underground well pumping unit, said unit having a sucker-rod string and means to reciprocate said rod string to pump fluid from a well, said method comprising the steps of:
generating a signal representative of a load on said rod string;
generating a signal representative of a position of said rod string;
using said load signal and said position signal to determine the rod string position each time said load signal has a minimum value during the downstroke of said rod string;
establishing a calibrate position of said rod string at a minimum load signal with fluid filling the pumping unit;
using said calibrate position and a minimum rod string position to determine a reference position of said rod string; and stopping said pumping unit when said rod position progressively moves downward at successive minimum load positions, to a position below said reference position.
31. A method of monitoring as defined in claim 30, wherein said step of using said calibrate position and a minimum rod string position includes the step of selecting a position a predetermined percent of the distance between said minimum rod string position and said calibrate position to determine said reference position.
CA000443475A 1982-12-17 1983-12-16 Method and appartus for detecting well pump-off Expired CA1217838A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US450,597 1982-12-17
US06/450,597 US4487061A (en) 1982-12-17 1982-12-17 Method and apparatus for detecting well pump-off

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CA1217838A true CA1217838A (en) 1987-02-10

Family

ID=23788742

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CA000443475A Expired CA1217838A (en) 1982-12-17 1983-12-16 Method and appartus for detecting well pump-off

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US4487061A (en)
CA (1) CA1217838A (en)
DE (1) DE3345830A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2538028A1 (en)
MX (1) MX162839B (en)

Families Citing this family (36)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4631954A (en) * 1982-11-18 1986-12-30 Mills Manuel D Apparatus for controlling a pumpjack prime mover
US4583915A (en) * 1983-08-01 1986-04-22 End Devices, Inc. Pump-off controller
US4622635A (en) * 1984-02-13 1986-11-11 Automated Controls Inc. Portable display and control terminal for wells
US4594665A (en) * 1984-02-13 1986-06-10 Fmc Corporation Well production control system
US4541274A (en) * 1984-05-10 1985-09-17 Board Of Regents For The University Of Oklahoma Apparatus and method for monitoring and controlling a pump system for a well
US5222867A (en) * 1986-08-29 1993-06-29 Walker Sr Frank J Method and system for controlling a mechanical pump to monitor and optimize both reservoir and equipment performance
US4873635A (en) * 1986-11-20 1989-10-10 Mills Manual D Pump-off control
US4973226A (en) * 1987-04-29 1990-11-27 Delta-X Corporation Method and apparatus for controlling a well pumping unit
US5006044A (en) * 1987-08-19 1991-04-09 Walker Sr Frank J Method and system for controlling a mechanical pump to monitor and optimize both reservoir and equipment performance
NL194895C (en) * 1988-08-02 2003-06-04 Shell Int Research Method for automatically deactivating a gas-filled pump.
US5105671A (en) * 1991-03-19 1992-04-21 Slater Frank W Well pumping unit with adjustable balance beam
WO1993002210A1 (en) * 1991-07-22 1993-02-04 Chrisope Technologies, Inc. Apparatus and methods for preserving, transporting, storing, re-hydrating and delivering viable microorganisms
US5237863A (en) * 1991-12-06 1993-08-24 Shell Oil Company Method for detecting pump-off of a rod pumped well
US5224834A (en) * 1991-12-24 1993-07-06 Evi-Highland Pump Company, Inc. Pump-off control by integrating a portion of the area of a dynagraph
US5246076A (en) * 1992-03-10 1993-09-21 Evi-Highland Pump Company Methods and apparatus for controlling long-stroke pumping units using a variable-speed drive
US5314016A (en) * 1993-05-19 1994-05-24 Shell Oil Company Method for controlling rod-pumped wells
US5362206A (en) * 1993-07-21 1994-11-08 Automation Associates Pump control responsive to voltage-current phase angle
US5458466A (en) * 1993-10-22 1995-10-17 Mills; Manuel D. Monitoring pump stroke for minimizing pump-off state
US6155347A (en) * 1999-04-12 2000-12-05 Kudu Industries, Inc. Method and apparatus for controlling the liquid level in a well
US6176682B1 (en) * 1999-08-06 2001-01-23 Manuel D. Mills Pumpjack dynamometer and method
CA2469059A1 (en) * 2001-12-03 2003-06-12 Abb Inc. Rod saver speed control method and apparatus
US7668694B2 (en) 2002-11-26 2010-02-23 Unico, Inc. Determination and control of wellbore fluid level, output flow, and desired pump operating speed, using a control system for a centrifugal pump disposed within the wellbore
US7168924B2 (en) * 2002-09-27 2007-01-30 Unico, Inc. Rod pump control system including parameter estimator
US7032659B2 (en) * 2003-01-23 2006-04-25 Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. Integrated control system for beam pump systems
US7634328B2 (en) * 2004-01-20 2009-12-15 Masoud Medizade Method, system and computer program product for monitoring and optimizing fluid extraction from geologic strata
CA2562398A1 (en) * 2005-10-05 2007-04-05 Eddie K. Wilson, Sr. Zero pollution vertical/linear electrical generation facility
US20080240930A1 (en) 2005-10-13 2008-10-02 Pumpwell Solution Ltd Method and System for Optimizing Downhole Fluid Production
US8892372B2 (en) 2011-07-14 2014-11-18 Unico, Inc. Estimating fluid levels in a progressing cavity pump system
EP2771541B8 (en) * 2011-10-28 2017-09-20 Weatherford Technology Holdings, LLC Calculating downhole cards in deviated wells
CA2921371A1 (en) 2013-08-21 2015-02-26 Spirit Global Energy Solutions, Inc. Laser position finding device used for control and diagnostics of a rod pumped well
WO2015117065A1 (en) 2014-01-31 2015-08-06 Mts Systems Corporation System and method of monitoring and optimizing the performance of a well pumping system
CN104568266A (en) * 2014-04-21 2015-04-29 山东天工石油装备有限公司 Method for detecting well opening and closing of pumping unit
US9689251B2 (en) 2014-05-08 2017-06-27 Unico, Inc. Subterranean pump with pump cleaning mode
CN105464627A (en) * 2015-12-20 2016-04-06 靳宝才 Scale type balance difference oil pumping unit
EA038583B1 (en) * 2020-02-19 2021-09-17 Институт Систем Управления Национальной Академии Наук Азербайджанской Республики Method for the control of a downhole pump supply process
US11619225B2 (en) 2020-12-08 2023-04-04 International Business Machines Corporation Identifying potential problems in a pumpjack

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2577479A (en) * 1948-05-24 1951-12-04 George E Owen Safety device for polish rod mountings of deep well pumps
US3306210A (en) * 1965-08-25 1967-02-28 Harvey W Boyd Automatic oil well pump control
US3817094A (en) * 1970-07-27 1974-06-18 Mobil Oil Corp Well monitoring apparatus
US3838597A (en) * 1971-12-28 1974-10-01 Mobil Oil Corp Method and apparatus for monitoring well pumping units
US3824851A (en) * 1972-06-01 1974-07-23 Mobil Oil Corp Automatic data retrieval system for pumping wells
US3926047A (en) * 1972-06-15 1975-12-16 Atlantic Richfield Co Well production signal means
US3851995A (en) * 1973-08-06 1974-12-03 M Mills Pump-off control apparatus for a pump jack
US3951209A (en) * 1975-06-09 1976-04-20 Shell Oil Company Method for determining the pump-off of a well
US4058757A (en) * 1976-04-19 1977-11-15 End Devices, Inc. Well pump-off controller
US4015469A (en) * 1976-07-02 1977-04-05 Shell Oil Company Pump-off monitor for rod pump wells
US4034808A (en) * 1976-09-20 1977-07-12 Shell Oil Company Method for pump-off detection
US4145161A (en) * 1977-08-10 1979-03-20 Standard Oil Company (Indiana) Speed control
US4143546A (en) * 1978-01-23 1979-03-13 Litton Systems, Inc. Sucker rod pump dynamometer
US4286925A (en) * 1979-10-31 1981-09-01 Delta-X Corporation Control circuit for shutting off the electrical power to a liquid well pump
US4307395A (en) * 1980-04-03 1981-12-22 Delta-X Corporation Method of and apparatus for recording, storing and replaying dynamometer data from a liquid well pump
US4363605A (en) * 1980-11-03 1982-12-14 Mills Manuel D Apparatus for generating an electrical signal which is proportional to the tension in a bridle

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE3345830A1 (en) 1984-06-20
MX162839B (en) 1991-06-28
US4487061A (en) 1984-12-11
FR2538028A1 (en) 1984-06-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CA1217838A (en) Method and appartus for detecting well pump-off
US4594665A (en) Well production control system
US4509901A (en) Method and apparatus for detecting problems in sucker-rod well pumps
US4695779A (en) Motor protection system and process
CA2551257C (en) Method for estimating pump efficiency
CA2403060C (en) Methods, apparatus and products useful in the operation of a sucker rod pump during the production of hydrocarbons
US5064349A (en) Method of monitoring and controlling a pumped well
US9896927B2 (en) Hydrocarbon well performance monitoring system
US3838597A (en) Method and apparatus for monitoring well pumping units
US5362206A (en) Pump control responsive to voltage-current phase angle
RU2246608C2 (en) Fully automated device for oil extraction
US4541274A (en) Apparatus and method for monitoring and controlling a pump system for a well
US6446014B1 (en) Method and apparatus for measuring and controlling the flow of fluids from coal seam gas wells
US5284422A (en) Method of monitoring and controlling a well pump apparatus
US3075466A (en) Electric motor control system
US4873635A (en) Pump-off control
US3824851A (en) Automatic data retrieval system for pumping wells
US5458466A (en) Monitoring pump stroke for minimizing pump-off state
CA2123784C (en) Pump-off control by integrating a portion of the area of a dynagraph
US20140088875A1 (en) Pumpjack torque fill estimation
US9200509B2 (en) System and method for measuring well flow rate
WO2017100669A1 (en) Controller for a rod pumping unit and method of operation
CA1207448A (en) Method and apparatus for weighing a sucker-rod pumped well
CA1207449A (en) Method and apparatus for entering control points relative to a dynagraph of a well pumping unit
WO1993002289A1 (en) Pump control using calculated downhole dynagraph information

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
MKEX Expiry