CA1216867A - Loss-in-weight gravimetric feeder - Google Patents
Loss-in-weight gravimetric feederInfo
- Publication number
- CA1216867A CA1216867A CA000448618A CA448618A CA1216867A CA 1216867 A CA1216867 A CA 1216867A CA 000448618 A CA000448618 A CA 000448618A CA 448618 A CA448618 A CA 448618A CA 1216867 A CA1216867 A CA 1216867A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- weight
- rate
- discharging
- discharge
- feeding
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01G—WEIGHING
- G01G11/00—Apparatus for weighing a continuous stream of material during flow; Conveyor belt weighers
- G01G11/08—Apparatus for weighing a continuous stream of material during flow; Conveyor belt weighers having means for controlling the rate of feed or discharge
- G01G11/086—Apparatus for weighing a continuous stream of material during flow; Conveyor belt weighers having means for controlling the rate of feed or discharge of the loss-in-weight feeding type
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01G—WEIGHING
- G01G19/00—Weighing apparatus or methods adapted for special purposes not provided for in the preceding groups
- G01G19/22—Weighing apparatus or methods adapted for special purposes not provided for in the preceding groups for apportioning materials by weighing prior to mixing them
- G01G19/32—Weighing apparatus or methods adapted for special purposes not provided for in the preceding groups for apportioning materials by weighing prior to mixing them using two or more weighing apparatus
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29B—PREPARATION OR PRETREATMENT OF THE MATERIAL TO BE SHAPED; MAKING GRANULES OR PREFORMS; RECOVERY OF PLASTICS OR OTHER CONSTITUENTS OF WASTE MATERIAL CONTAINING PLASTICS
- B29B7/00—Mixing; Kneading
- B29B7/02—Mixing; Kneading non-continuous, with mechanical mixing or kneading devices, i.e. batch type
- B29B7/22—Component parts, details or accessories; Auxiliary operations
- B29B7/24—Component parts, details or accessories; Auxiliary operations for feeding
- B29B7/242—Component parts, details or accessories; Auxiliary operations for feeding in measured doses
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B29—WORKING OF PLASTICS; WORKING OF SUBSTANCES IN A PLASTIC STATE IN GENERAL
- B29B—PREPARATION OR PRETREATMENT OF THE MATERIAL TO BE SHAPED; MAKING GRANULES OR PREFORMS; RECOVERY OF PLASTICS OR OTHER CONSTITUENTS OF WASTE MATERIAL CONTAINING PLASTICS
- B29B7/00—Mixing; Kneading
- B29B7/30—Mixing; Kneading continuous, with mechanical mixing or kneading devices
- B29B7/58—Component parts, details or accessories; Auxiliary operations
- B29B7/60—Component parts, details or accessories; Auxiliary operations for feeding, e.g. end guides for the incoming material
Abstract
LOSS-IN-WEIGHT GRAVIMETRIC FEEDER
Abstract of the Disclosure A loss-in-weight gravimetric feeding system is dis-closed which includes a prefeeder for receiving and discharging material and at least first and second feeders for receiving material from the prefeeder and discharging the received material to a common collector. The system includes a device for alter-nately diverting material discharged from the prefeeder to the first and second feeders, circuits for generating a first and second weight signal representative of the weight of material in the first and second feeders respectively, and structure for generating a reference signal representative of a desired mass flow rate of material from a feeder. The system further includes a circuit for alternately comparing the reference signal to the first and second weight signals in synchronism with the diverting device for controlling each of the feeders based on the compari-son between the reference signal and the weight signal associated with the feeder.
Abstract of the Disclosure A loss-in-weight gravimetric feeding system is dis-closed which includes a prefeeder for receiving and discharging material and at least first and second feeders for receiving material from the prefeeder and discharging the received material to a common collector. The system includes a device for alter-nately diverting material discharged from the prefeeder to the first and second feeders, circuits for generating a first and second weight signal representative of the weight of material in the first and second feeders respectively, and structure for generating a reference signal representative of a desired mass flow rate of material from a feeder. The system further includes a circuit for alternately comparing the reference signal to the first and second weight signals in synchronism with the diverting device for controlling each of the feeders based on the compari-son between the reference signal and the weight signal associated with the feeder.
Description
Background of the Invention Loss-in-weight feeders are in widespread use in the material handling industry and are used to deliver particulate and other materials at precise feed rates. Typiaally, a los~-in-weight feeder measures the decrease in weight of material con-tained in the feeder over a period of time. The weight loss by the feeder in that period of time is exactly equal to the weight of material delivered to the next step in the material handling process. This mode of operation, because it measures change in weight per unit time, is referred to as "gravimetricn operation.
An advantage of loss-;n-weight feeders is that there is no possibility of feed rate errors due to storage or material accumulation in the material handling system. Thus, for example, if it is determined that the weight of a loss-in-weight feeder has decreased 30 pounds in one hour, then it can be said with certainty that those 30 pounds have been delivered to the next step in the process and are not t'lost" due to storage or spillage somewhere in the system upstream of the feeder.
A disadvantage of present loss-in-weight feeding sys-tems is that, in measuring weight loss from a feeder, accurate weight measurements cannot be made when material is being added to the feeder during refill. While the feeder is being refilled, loss-in-weight measurements are impossible because material is being added to the feeder at an uncontrolled rate. In addition, the weighlng device, usually a scale, is subjected to impact forees generated by the added material, entrapped air, and other factors which result in weight readings that vary widely and arel
An advantage of loss-;n-weight feeders is that there is no possibility of feed rate errors due to storage or material accumulation in the material handling system. Thus, for example, if it is determined that the weight of a loss-in-weight feeder has decreased 30 pounds in one hour, then it can be said with certainty that those 30 pounds have been delivered to the next step in the process and are not t'lost" due to storage or spillage somewhere in the system upstream of the feeder.
A disadvantage of present loss-in-weight feeding sys-tems is that, in measuring weight loss from a feeder, accurate weight measurements cannot be made when material is being added to the feeder during refill. While the feeder is being refilled, loss-in-weight measurements are impossible because material is being added to the feeder at an uncontrolled rate. In addition, the weighlng device, usually a scale, is subjected to impact forees generated by the added material, entrapped air, and other factors which result in weight readings that vary widely and arel
2 ~
~ .
,~ '.
~Z~L6~
inaccurate. During refill, therefore, it is customary to operate loss-in-weight feeders in a volumetric mode (which delivers a given volume of material per unit time) rather than in a gravi-metric mode which would produce inaccurate feed control. ~ecause refill may constitute a substantial portion of the feeder operat-ing cycle, the overall accuracy of the system may b~ signiflcant-ly reduced.
The necessity for switching to a volumetric mode of operation during refill has additional disadvantages as well. In order to achieve high feed rates, refill time must be minimized.
This requires expensive, high-quality~ crltically-damped scales to make certain that perturbations introduced during refill have been damped out when the system re-enters the gravimetric mode.
If the chosen scale is under-damped or over-damped, large hoppers are requ;red to ensure that the system will operate in gravime-tric control for a long enough time to provide stable weight data. However, the use of large hoppers to accomodate high feed rates can also result-in poor accuracy because larger hoppers are more easily affected by outside forces than small hoppers. In order to minimize inaccuracy, therefore, feed r~tes must general-ly be kept low.
Accordingly, the present invention has been developed to substantially reduce the foregoing problems and to produce an improved loss-in-weight feeding system which allows gravimetric operation for 100 percent of the operating time.
I
I, . I
, ~
, lZ16867 Sumrnary of the Invention In ~ccordance with the present invention~ the loss-in-weight gravimetric feeding system includes a prefeeder for re-ceiving and discharging material Qnd at least Eirst and second feeders for receiving material from the prefeeder and discharging the réceived material to a common collector. The invention includes means for alternately diverting material discharged from the prefeeder to the first and second feeders, means for generating a first and second weight signal representative of the _ weight of material in the first ~.nd second feeders respectively, and means for generating a reference signal representative of a desired m~ss flow rate of material from a feeder. The invention further includes means for alternately comparing the reference signal to the first and second weight signals in synchronism with ¦ the diverter means and means for controlling each of the feeders ¦ based on the comparison between the reference signal and the - ¦ weight signal associated with the feeder.
¦ It is therefore a feature of the inventlon to provide ¦ an accurate loss-in-weight feeding system.
¦ It iS another feature of the invention to provide a continuous loss-in-weight gravimetric feeding system for feeding ¦ at high feed rates.
¦ It is still another feature of the invention to provide j a continuous loss-in-weight feeding system which is compact and !! easily implemented.
!~ A still further feature of the invention is to provide¦
¦I a continuous loss-in-weight feeding system which obviates the need for volumetric control during refill.
_ , iZ16867 These and other advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed de-scription when considered in connection with the acco,npanying drawings wherein:
Brief Description of the Drawin~s . For .the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings a form which is presently preferred; it being understocd, however, that this invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
Pigure 1 shows a loss-in-weight gravimetric feed system in accordance with the present invention in diagrammatic form;
Figure 2 is a block diagram of the control circuitry used in the system shown in ~igure l;
Figure 3 is a portion of the control circuitry shown in ~igure 2, showing additional internal details of the control panel and the controller;
Figure 4 is a timing diagram showing the relationship of material flow, scale weight and control signals with respect to time. The signals have been idealized for clarity;
~ igure 5 shows the set point ramp of the present inven-tion in comparison with the prior art; and Figure 6 is a curve of drive command frequency as a function of error signal.
Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment .
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like numerals indicate ~like elements, there is shown in ~igure 1 a loss-in-weight eeder 10 in accordance with the present invention.
,, . I
., ., . 1.
.
' ~ Z~3~ 7 Material to be fed by the system is put into the inlet 42 of prefeeder 12. Material inflow is indicated by ~ . Pre-feeder 12 may be any conventional feeding apparatus. Pre~eeder 12 has a hopper 13 provided with a feed screw, auger or other conventional material feed apparatus 15, which is controlled by feed motor 14. Located below prefeeder 12 are two feeders 16 and 18. Feeders 16 and 18 have inlets 46 and 48, respectively, and comprise material feeding apparatus such as a feed screw or other conventional feeding apparatus 17 and 19, respectively, con trolled by feed motors 20 and 22, respectively. Although for convenience the term "feed screw" is used in this description, it should be understood that the invention includes the use of any suitable material feeding apparatus and is not limited to the use of a feed screw.
Feeders 16 and 18 are suspended from scales 24 and 26, respectively, which weigh the feeders 16 and 18 and the material therein. Scales 24 and 26 are conventional scales and generate electrical signals representative of the weight of feeders 16 and 18. The weight signals generated by scales 24 and 26 will be referred to herein as weight "A" and weight "B" signals, respec-tively. (~lthough the term l'weight" is used throughout this description, mass rather than weight may be sensed. Accordingly, the term weight should be read as includlng either weight or mass, without departing from the scope of the invention.) Feeders 16 and 18 also have outlets 50 snd 52, respectively, from which material being fed is discharged to a comnon collector 283 which may be any suitable collector.
lZ~L6~
Located immediately beiow the outlet 44 of prefeeder 12 is a diverter valve 30. In the embodiment illustrated, diverter valve 30 is a blade-shaped member which pivots at one end 36 between a first position (shown in solid lines) and a second position 30' (shown in broken lines). Diverter valve 30 serves to divert the flow of material from prefeeder 12 alternately to feeders 16 and 18 so that changing the position of diverter valve 30 from the first position to the second position 30' will cause feeders 16 and 18 to be filled alternately with material from ¦prefeeder 12.
In the illustrated embodiment of the invention, idiverter valve 30 is biased by spring 34 which is connected to diverter valve 30 at a point 38 somewhere above pivot 36. Spr-ing 34 is anchored to a fixed member at 40. Spring 34 serves to urge diverter valve 30 to the first position. Diverter valve 30 is moved from the first position to the second position 30' by means of a push rod 31 which pushes diverter valve 30 against the force exerted by spring 34 to position 30'. Push rod 31 is shown in Figure l as being actuated by an electric solenoid 32, but may be ~ctuated by any suitable means, such as a hydraulic or pneumatic piston. When solenoid 32 is energized, push rod 31 pushes against diverter valve 30 and causes the valve 30 to move to position 30'. When solenoid 32 is de-energized, push rod 31 retracts, and diverter valve 30 moves from the second position 30' back to the first position under the force of spring 34. .
It should be understood that the particular mechanism which causes diverter valve 30 to change position is not critical , I .
, I .
~161~67 to the invention. Thus, for example, diverter valve 30 may be caused to ~ove by use of two opposed solenoids or two opposed pistons, or any other mechanism for effecting ~ovement o~
diverter valve 30, without dep~rtir,g from the instant invention.
Likewise, it should be understood that any other type of diverter valve rnay be used without departing from the scope o~ the inven-tion.
In operation, prefeeder 12 discharges material contin-uously. When diverter valve 30 is in the first position, mater-ial added to the system flows through prefeeder 12 and is diverted by diverter valve 30 into feeder 16. When diverter valve 30 is in position 30', the material discharged by prefeeder 12 is diverted to feeder 18. Diverter valve 30 is in the first position for 50 percent of the time and is in the second position 30' for 5~ percent of the time, so that the material discharged by prefeeder 12 is alternately directed to feeders 16 and 18.
That is, the period of time in which diverter valve 30 diverts material to feeder 16 is substantially equal to the period of time in which diverter valve 30 diverts material to feeder 18.
The volumetric capacity of prefeeder 12 is preferably less than or equal to 8~ percent of the volumetric capacity of feeders 16 and 18, so that there is no possibility of overfilling feeders 16 and 18 or of having material "back up" in the system.
A block diagram of the control circuitry for the inven-tion is shown in Figure 2. Controller 58 includes a control panel 54, which has a row of switches 56 to enable an operator to select the desired mass flow rate of the system. The output of ~Z1681~7 ¦control panel S4 is a signal which is a negative-going ramp7 the ¦slope of which is representative of the desired rate of decrease ¦of the weight of feeders 16 or 18 during discharge7 i.e., the ¦desired mass flow rate o feeders 16 or 18. The ram~ wave form ¦is generated by ramp generator 76, shown in ~igure 3. The manner in which the ram~ wave-form may be generated will be understood by persons familiar with loss-in-weight feeding systems. ~or convenience, the ramp wave-form generated by ramp generator 76 may be referred to as the ~set point raMpn. The set point ramp wave-form is shown in Figure 4.
Although the set point ramp may be generated in a con-ventional manner, it must be emphasized that the set point ramp of the present invention is not a conventional loss-in-weight set point ramp. The set point ramp of the present invention differs from a conventional set point ramp primarily in that no portion of the set point ramp of the present invention corresponds to the period of time a feeder is being refilled. Each cycle of the present set point ramp represents the loss in weight of one or the other of feeders 16 and 18 during discharge. Other differ-ences between the-set point ramp of the present invention and the prior art are shown in Figure 5.
Instead of utilizing the integrating type of controller described above (i.e. 9 generating a set-point ramp and comparing slope), a differentiating type of controller may be used without departing from the scope of the invention. Differentiating con-¦¦ trollers, which generate a fixed setpoint and measure actual massflow by computing weight loss over a period of time, are well-known in the art and need not be described in detail.
1l ~ 9 ~
.
~IZ16~i7 One output of controller 58 is a drive command fre~uen-cy, which is a series of'pulses representative of the speed at which eeder motors 20 and 22 must be driven to obtain an actual mass flow rate equal to the desired mass flow rate selected at control panel 54. The weight output signal from selector 72 is compared to the set point ramp in comparator circuit 78. Cumpar-ator circuit 78 is a conventional comparator circuit which corn-pares the instantaneous slope of the weight output signal with the instantaneous slope of the set point rarnp and generates an error signal E representative of the difference between the weight output signals and the set point ramp. Error signal E is sent to pulse generator 80, which generates a series of pulses called the drive command signa'l, shown in Figure 3 as the Drive C~D Freq. The frequency of the pulses varies wjth the error signal E so that, for example, when the error signal F indicates an actual mass flow rate greater than desired, the frequency of the pulses decreases, causing feed motors 20 and 22 to run more slowly and thus reduce actual mass flow rate. Conversely, if the error signal E indicates a mass flow rate less than desired, the frequency of the pulses increases, causing motors 20 and 22 to run faster and thus increase actuai mass flow rate. Error signal E also controls the speed of feed motor 14 associated with pre-feeder 12 so that the speeds of motors 20 and 22 and the speed of motor 14 increase or decrease in the same proportion. The rela-tionship between motors 20 and 22 and motor 14 is discussed more fully below. The relation between the error signal E and the fre-~quency of the puls'es is shown in Figure 6. The way in which the ¦
I . ' .
' - 10-.
lZl6~1~7 error signal and the drive comnand signal may be generated will ¦be understood by those versed in the art.
¦ It should also be understood that, although the drive ¦command signal described herein is a series of pulses controlled ¦by the error signal E, the drive command signal could be a vol-¦ tage, current or any other signal generated in response to errorsignal E for controlling the motors 14, 20 and 22 without départ-inK from the scope of the inYention.
The other output of controlLer 58 is the A/B SELECT
signal. The A/B SELECT signal is a square wave having a period twice that of the set point ramp. Each transition of the A/B
SELECT signal causes diverter valve 30 to change position. Like-wise, each transition causes selector circuit 72 to switch from ¦ one weight signal to the other, as will be explained more fully below. The transitions of the A/B SELECT signal occur at the respective minimum weights of feeders 16 and 18, as shown in ~ Figure 4. As presently preferred, the .weight signal from selector circuit 72 is split in controller 58 and is sent simul-taneously to comparator circuit 78 (as described above) and to level detector 82. Leyei detector 82 is a conventional level detecting circuit. U~en level detector 82 senses that the weight ~¦ signal from selector circuit 72 is at a minimum, it signals a logic element 84, shown in Figure 3 as a flip-flop but which can ! be any suitable logic element, to change state. The output of logic element 84 is the A/B SELECT signal.
The drive com~and frequency output of controller 58 is sent to two identical frequency/analog converters 60 and 62J
, . .
" - 11 - ' I
~ lZ16B67 where the drive command frequency is converted to an analog Yol~
tage represent~tive of desired feed motor speed. Frequencg/analog converters are conventional elements and need not be described further. The outputs of frequency/analog converters 60 and 62 are sent to motor drive circuits 68 and 70 respectively. Motor drive circuits 68 and 70 are conventional circuits. Any conven-tional motor and motor drive may be used.
The output of motor drive circuit 68 drives feed motors 20 and 22 associated with feeders 16 and 18 respectively. Feed motors 20 and 22 are driven in parallel, so that both motors 20 and 22 are driven at precisely the same speed. The output of motor drive circuit 70 drives feed motor 14 associated with pre-feeder 12. Were it not for variable resistors 64 and 66, feed motor 14 would necessarily be driven at the same speed as feed motors 20 and 22, because the same drive command frequency from controller 58 is used to control all three motors. Variable resistors 64 and 66 are provided to "trim" the speeds of the motors so that prefeeder motor 14 may be caused to run more slowly than feed motors 20 and 22. This is to ensure that the maximum volumetric flow of prefeeder 12 will be less than the maximum volumetric flow of feeders 16 and 18, so that there is no possibility of overfeeding feeders 16 and 18 or of accumulating¦
material in the feeders.
All t~ree motors are run continuously when the system is in operation and, because all are driven by the same drivel comnand frequency, the motors "track" each other. That is, the¦
speeds of motors 20 and 22 and the speed of motor 14 increase or , ~Z~iL6867 decrease in the same proportion. The precise speeds of feed motors 14, 20 and 22 are not crîtical so long as (1) the speed of motor 14 is less than the speed of motors 20 and 22 so that maxi-mum vo}umetric flow of prefeeder 12 is preferably less than or equal to 80% of maximum volurnetric flow of feeders 16 and 18, and t2) the speed of motor 14 "tracks" the speed of motors 20 and 22 so that the ratio of volumetric flow of prefeeder 12 to volume-tric flow of feeders 16 and 18 remains constant, preventing stor-age in feeders 16 and 18 and minimizing prefeeder-to-collector delay in feed rate adjustments.
In the illustrated embodiment, and as presently pre-ferred, the motor speed control is operated in an "open loop"
configuration. That is, no feèdback of motor speed information I is used to control motor speed. Motor speed is controlled by comparing the loss-in-weight signal representative of material fed from feeders 16 and 18 to the set point ramp signal generated by control panel 54. However, it should be understood that a closed loop motor control with motor speed feedback may be used for even greater accuracy if desired.
The weight output signals of scales 24 and 26 (weight "A~ and weight "B" signals, respectively) are sent to selector circuit 72, which is a conventional time multiplexing circuit.
The output of selector circuit 72 is described more fully below.
The output of selector circuit 72 is sent to controller 58, where, as shown in Figure 3, it is compared to the set point ramp¦
generated by control panel 54 to generate the drive command fre-¦ quency signal.
- 13 - , I
' ' i .
' lZ~ 7 Selector circuit 72 is controlled by the A/B SELECT
signal output of controller 58. The A/B SELECT signal causes selector circuit 72 to alternately transmit the discharge por-tions of the weight output signals of scales 24 and 26 to con-troller 58 for comparison to the set point ramp in proper ti~ed relationship as discussed more fully below. The A/B SELECT signal is also sent to diverter valve control circuit 74, which actuates diverter solenoid 32 so- that the selector circuit 72 and the diverter valve control circuit 74 are operated in synchronism.
Referring to ~igure 4, the weight and control signals are shown in their time relationship. All of the signals shown in Figure 4 have been ideàlized for the sake of clarity. In actual practice, the signals shown in Figure 4 may differ from their idealized form without departing from the instant inven-tion. As described in connection with Figure l, diverter valve 30 is operated to cause feeders 16 and 18 to be filled alternate-ly. Thus, for example, when diverter valve 30 is in the first position, material is added to feeder 16 and the weight of feeder 16 will increase as indicated by the top curve in ~igure 4 (weight "A" signal). Meanwhile, the material in feeder 18 is being discharged, and the weight of feeder 18 will decrease, as shown in the third curve in ~igure 4 (weight "B" signal). When controller 52 senses that the weight of feeder 18 has reached a preselected minimum, (point "a" on the weight "B" signal curve), the A/B SELECT signal changes state and causes diverter valve 30 to move to its second position 30', halting the flow of material to feeder 16. Because feed motor 20 is run continuously, the Il . . ~i ~16867 material which was added to feeder 16 will now begin to dis~
charge, and the weight of material in feeder 16 decreases (frorn point l'a" to point "bl' on the weight "A" signal curve). The rate at which material is added to feeder 16 ~i.e. the discharge rate of prefeeder 12) is chosen to equal the discharge rate of feeder 16. Thus, since input and output rates are equal, there is no storage of material in feeder 16. The feed rate of feeder l6 is chosen such that material begins to be discharged from feeder 16 at precisely the same moment that diverter valve 30 changes posi-tion to 30' and feeder 18 begins filling.
At point "b" on the weight "A" signal curve~ feeder 16 has discharged all of the ~aterial contained therein. When con-troller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 16 has reached a preselected mlnimum, the A/B SELFCT signal again changes state and causes diverter valve 30 to move from its second position 30' to the first position. Material now begins to refill feeder 16. The weight of material in feeder 16 therefore begins to increase from point nb" to point "c" on the curve, repeating the above-described cycle.
As shown by the second curve in ~igure 4, while feeder 16 is discharging (between points na~ and 'Ib"), the flow of material from feeder 16 is constant. While feeder 16 is being¦
filled (between points nbn and nct'), the flow from feeder 16 is zero. Feeder 18 behaves in the identical manner as feeder 16, except that, because it is filled alternately, the curves repre-senting the change in weight of material in feeder 18 and the¦
discharge of feeder 18 are shifted in time relationship by 180¦
from the curves for feeder 16.
i:Zl~;8~;~
The fifth curve in Pigure 4 is the set point ramp signal generated by control panel 54. The set point r~m~ sign'al ¦,is a negative-going ramp with a period T equal to the period of time feeders 16 and 18 require to discharge the material con~' tained therein to obtain the desired m~ss flow rate selected at control panel 54. The seventh curve ,in Figure 3 is the output from selector circuit 72. Selector circuit 72 selects the weight "A" and weight "B" signals from scales 24 and 26 so that only the portion of the weight "A" and weight "B" signàls during discharge of the associated feeder are utilized. Each transition of the A/B SELECT signal (the si~th curve in Figure 4) causes selecto~
circuit 72 to switch from one weight signal to,the other. The set point ram~ and the weight output from selector circuit 72 are compared in controller 58 to generate the drive command frequency as described above.
The flow of m~terial through feéder 16, for example, may be readily understood by reference to Figure 4. The flow of mate'rial through feeder 18 is identical to that of feeder 16.
The speed of feed screw 15 is substantially constant in order to achieve a constant feed rate. Since the speed of feed screw 15 is constant, the transit time of material through feeder 16 is constant. The speed of feed screw 15 is chosen so that material added to inlet 46 of feeder 16 at time to reaches outlet 50 at~
time to + T. That is, the transit time of material from inlet 461 to outlet 50 is ~. It will also be observed from Figure 4 that diverter valve,30 is moved after each period T of the set point ramp~ Thus, since the transit time is T, material added to the 1,~ ' ' ' .
~ 16 -~ lZ16867 feeder during one period is discharged during the next period (when no material is added to eeder 16). Material addéd to feeder 16 at the beginning of a period T will transit feeder 16 in that period, reaching outlet 50 at the beginning of the next period. M~terial added at the end of a period T will transit the feeder during the next period and will reach outlet 50 at the end of that next period. Thus,. there will be no storage of material in feeders 16 or 18.
When the system is initially started, controller 58 signals selector circuit 72 (by means of the A/B SELECT signal) to send to controller 58 the weight signal from a preselected one of feeders 16 and 18, for example, feeder 18. .ThusJ the system always begins by "looking at" .the weight signal of a preselected scale, in this example, always scale 26. If there is no material in feeder 18 (for example, because diverter valve 30 is in the first position), the weight signal from scale 26 will be at its minimum, corresponding to point "a" on the weight "B" signal curve in Figure 4. Accordingly, controller 58 is programmed to cause diverter valYe 30 to move to thè second position 30' to begin filling feeder 18. Diverter valve 30 remains in the second posit;on 30' until controller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 18 is at a preselected maximum. At that point, diverter valve 30 is moved to the first position, feeder 16 begins filling and feeder 18 begins discharging.
~ en controller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 18 .
is at the minimum, it signals (by means of the A/B SELEC~ signal) diverter valve control 74 to energize solenoid 32. Diverter _ 17 _ 1.
~i ' ~Z~686~ ~
valve 30 is thereby moved to the second position 30l and materi~l being discharged by pre~eeder 12 is diverted to feeder 18 to begin filling it. Simultaneoulsy, controller 58 signals selector circuit 72 to transmit to controller 58 the weight signal ~rom scale 24. The material in feeder 16 is now discharged until feeder 16 is empty and the weigh~ of feeder 16 is at a minimum.
While feeder 16 is discharging, feeder 18 is being filled. When feeder 16 is emptyj feeder 18 will be at its maximum weight.
When controller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 16 is at the minimum~ it signals diverter valve 74 to de~energize solenoid 32. Diverter valve 30 is returned to the first position and the material being discharged by prefeeder 12 is now diverted to feeder 16, which begins to fill while feeder 18 begins to dis-charge. This cycle then repeats as long as the system remains in operation. The way in which controller 58 may be programmed to carry out the above-described functions will be readily apparent to persons familiar with loss-in-weight feeding systems and need not be described here in detail.
As presently preferred, controller 58 senses minimum and maximum weights of feeders 16 and 18 by conventional level detecting techniques. However, it is understood that any other method of sensing minimum or maximum such as computing change of slope~ for example, may be employed without departing from the instant invention.
By utilizing the weight output of scales 24 and 26 only while their associated feeders 16 and 18, respectively, are dis-char~ing, controller 58 is able to make pure loss-in-weight mea-¦
SUreMentS on the discharging feeder. Controller 58 is al~ays performing pure loss-in-weight measurements on one of the two ., i , ~Z16~67 feeders~ so that there is no period of time in which the system must be operated in volumetric control.
It should be understood th~t the in~ention is not limited to the use of two feeders operating at ~ fifty percent duty cycle. Por example, feeder 16 may have twice the capacity of feeder 18. In this case, the system would operate with feeder 16 on a duty cycle of 2/3 and feeder 18 on a duty cycle of 1/3 to provide a constant feed rate. Likewise, for example, four feeders of equal capacity m~y be used, each operating on Q duty cycle of twenty-five percent. Thus, any arrangement of feeder capacity, number of feeders and duty cycles may be employed with-out departing from the scope of the present invention.
It is also possible to operate the system using only a single scale. For example, scale 26 may be eliminated. In this embodiment, loss-in-weight measurements are made on feeder 16 during the period of time it is discharging. That is, weight signal "A" is compared to the set point ramp by controller 58 while feeder 16 is discharging. -The result of the comparison (error signal E) is stored, in conventional fashion, in memory within controller 58. ~hen feeder 16 is empty, diverter valve 30 is moved to the first position as already described, feeder 16 begins to refill and feeder 18 begins to discharge. However, in this embodiment, instead of compari~g weight signal ~'B" to the set point ramp when feeder 18 is discharging, controller 58 recalls from memory error signal E stored when feeder 16 was discharging. The recalled error signal ~ from feeder 16 is used to control th~e speed of feed motor 22 in feeder 18. That is, ~Z168~i7 because feeders 16 and 18 are identical, it is assu~ed that the weight signal "A" during discharge of feeder 16 is identical to the weight signal "B" when feeder 18 is discharging. Thus, both feeders 16 and 18 are controlled by the weight signal of one of them. The error signal E is updated for each discharge cycle of feeder l6.
This embodiment is of course inherently less accurate than the first-described embodiment because during the time feeder 18 is discharging no actual loss-in-weight measurements are being made. Thus, during the time feeder 18 is discharging, the system actually is operating in what may be called '~quasi-gravimetric" control, which is an approximation of gravimetric control, rather than true gravimetric controi. However, this embodiment is also less complex than the first embodiment, and for certain applications may provide suitable accuracy.
The present invention may be embodied in.other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof and, according-ly, reference should be made to the append-ed claims, rather than to the foregoing specification, as indi-cating the scope of the invention.
~1~ ' .
1~ . .
~ . ' !
1,l
~ .
,~ '.
~Z~L6~
inaccurate. During refill, therefore, it is customary to operate loss-in-weight feeders in a volumetric mode (which delivers a given volume of material per unit time) rather than in a gravi-metric mode which would produce inaccurate feed control. ~ecause refill may constitute a substantial portion of the feeder operat-ing cycle, the overall accuracy of the system may b~ signiflcant-ly reduced.
The necessity for switching to a volumetric mode of operation during refill has additional disadvantages as well. In order to achieve high feed rates, refill time must be minimized.
This requires expensive, high-quality~ crltically-damped scales to make certain that perturbations introduced during refill have been damped out when the system re-enters the gravimetric mode.
If the chosen scale is under-damped or over-damped, large hoppers are requ;red to ensure that the system will operate in gravime-tric control for a long enough time to provide stable weight data. However, the use of large hoppers to accomodate high feed rates can also result-in poor accuracy because larger hoppers are more easily affected by outside forces than small hoppers. In order to minimize inaccuracy, therefore, feed r~tes must general-ly be kept low.
Accordingly, the present invention has been developed to substantially reduce the foregoing problems and to produce an improved loss-in-weight feeding system which allows gravimetric operation for 100 percent of the operating time.
I
I, . I
, ~
, lZ16867 Sumrnary of the Invention In ~ccordance with the present invention~ the loss-in-weight gravimetric feeding system includes a prefeeder for re-ceiving and discharging material Qnd at least Eirst and second feeders for receiving material from the prefeeder and discharging the réceived material to a common collector. The invention includes means for alternately diverting material discharged from the prefeeder to the first and second feeders, means for generating a first and second weight signal representative of the _ weight of material in the first ~.nd second feeders respectively, and means for generating a reference signal representative of a desired m~ss flow rate of material from a feeder. The invention further includes means for alternately comparing the reference signal to the first and second weight signals in synchronism with ¦ the diverter means and means for controlling each of the feeders ¦ based on the comparison between the reference signal and the - ¦ weight signal associated with the feeder.
¦ It is therefore a feature of the inventlon to provide ¦ an accurate loss-in-weight feeding system.
¦ It iS another feature of the invention to provide a continuous loss-in-weight gravimetric feeding system for feeding ¦ at high feed rates.
¦ It is still another feature of the invention to provide j a continuous loss-in-weight feeding system which is compact and !! easily implemented.
!~ A still further feature of the invention is to provide¦
¦I a continuous loss-in-weight feeding system which obviates the need for volumetric control during refill.
_ , iZ16867 These and other advantages and novel features of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed de-scription when considered in connection with the acco,npanying drawings wherein:
Brief Description of the Drawin~s . For .the purpose of illustrating the invention, there is shown in the drawings a form which is presently preferred; it being understocd, however, that this invention is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown.
Pigure 1 shows a loss-in-weight gravimetric feed system in accordance with the present invention in diagrammatic form;
Figure 2 is a block diagram of the control circuitry used in the system shown in ~igure l;
Figure 3 is a portion of the control circuitry shown in ~igure 2, showing additional internal details of the control panel and the controller;
Figure 4 is a timing diagram showing the relationship of material flow, scale weight and control signals with respect to time. The signals have been idealized for clarity;
~ igure 5 shows the set point ramp of the present inven-tion in comparison with the prior art; and Figure 6 is a curve of drive command frequency as a function of error signal.
Detailed Description of a Preferred Embodiment .
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like numerals indicate ~like elements, there is shown in ~igure 1 a loss-in-weight eeder 10 in accordance with the present invention.
,, . I
., ., . 1.
.
' ~ Z~3~ 7 Material to be fed by the system is put into the inlet 42 of prefeeder 12. Material inflow is indicated by ~ . Pre-feeder 12 may be any conventional feeding apparatus. Pre~eeder 12 has a hopper 13 provided with a feed screw, auger or other conventional material feed apparatus 15, which is controlled by feed motor 14. Located below prefeeder 12 are two feeders 16 and 18. Feeders 16 and 18 have inlets 46 and 48, respectively, and comprise material feeding apparatus such as a feed screw or other conventional feeding apparatus 17 and 19, respectively, con trolled by feed motors 20 and 22, respectively. Although for convenience the term "feed screw" is used in this description, it should be understood that the invention includes the use of any suitable material feeding apparatus and is not limited to the use of a feed screw.
Feeders 16 and 18 are suspended from scales 24 and 26, respectively, which weigh the feeders 16 and 18 and the material therein. Scales 24 and 26 are conventional scales and generate electrical signals representative of the weight of feeders 16 and 18. The weight signals generated by scales 24 and 26 will be referred to herein as weight "A" and weight "B" signals, respec-tively. (~lthough the term l'weight" is used throughout this description, mass rather than weight may be sensed. Accordingly, the term weight should be read as includlng either weight or mass, without departing from the scope of the invention.) Feeders 16 and 18 also have outlets 50 snd 52, respectively, from which material being fed is discharged to a comnon collector 283 which may be any suitable collector.
lZ~L6~
Located immediately beiow the outlet 44 of prefeeder 12 is a diverter valve 30. In the embodiment illustrated, diverter valve 30 is a blade-shaped member which pivots at one end 36 between a first position (shown in solid lines) and a second position 30' (shown in broken lines). Diverter valve 30 serves to divert the flow of material from prefeeder 12 alternately to feeders 16 and 18 so that changing the position of diverter valve 30 from the first position to the second position 30' will cause feeders 16 and 18 to be filled alternately with material from ¦prefeeder 12.
In the illustrated embodiment of the invention, idiverter valve 30 is biased by spring 34 which is connected to diverter valve 30 at a point 38 somewhere above pivot 36. Spr-ing 34 is anchored to a fixed member at 40. Spring 34 serves to urge diverter valve 30 to the first position. Diverter valve 30 is moved from the first position to the second position 30' by means of a push rod 31 which pushes diverter valve 30 against the force exerted by spring 34 to position 30'. Push rod 31 is shown in Figure l as being actuated by an electric solenoid 32, but may be ~ctuated by any suitable means, such as a hydraulic or pneumatic piston. When solenoid 32 is energized, push rod 31 pushes against diverter valve 30 and causes the valve 30 to move to position 30'. When solenoid 32 is de-energized, push rod 31 retracts, and diverter valve 30 moves from the second position 30' back to the first position under the force of spring 34. .
It should be understood that the particular mechanism which causes diverter valve 30 to change position is not critical , I .
, I .
~161~67 to the invention. Thus, for example, diverter valve 30 may be caused to ~ove by use of two opposed solenoids or two opposed pistons, or any other mechanism for effecting ~ovement o~
diverter valve 30, without dep~rtir,g from the instant invention.
Likewise, it should be understood that any other type of diverter valve rnay be used without departing from the scope o~ the inven-tion.
In operation, prefeeder 12 discharges material contin-uously. When diverter valve 30 is in the first position, mater-ial added to the system flows through prefeeder 12 and is diverted by diverter valve 30 into feeder 16. When diverter valve 30 is in position 30', the material discharged by prefeeder 12 is diverted to feeder 18. Diverter valve 30 is in the first position for 50 percent of the time and is in the second position 30' for 5~ percent of the time, so that the material discharged by prefeeder 12 is alternately directed to feeders 16 and 18.
That is, the period of time in which diverter valve 30 diverts material to feeder 16 is substantially equal to the period of time in which diverter valve 30 diverts material to feeder 18.
The volumetric capacity of prefeeder 12 is preferably less than or equal to 8~ percent of the volumetric capacity of feeders 16 and 18, so that there is no possibility of overfilling feeders 16 and 18 or of having material "back up" in the system.
A block diagram of the control circuitry for the inven-tion is shown in Figure 2. Controller 58 includes a control panel 54, which has a row of switches 56 to enable an operator to select the desired mass flow rate of the system. The output of ~Z1681~7 ¦control panel S4 is a signal which is a negative-going ramp7 the ¦slope of which is representative of the desired rate of decrease ¦of the weight of feeders 16 or 18 during discharge7 i.e., the ¦desired mass flow rate o feeders 16 or 18. The ram~ wave form ¦is generated by ramp generator 76, shown in ~igure 3. The manner in which the ram~ wave-form may be generated will be understood by persons familiar with loss-in-weight feeding systems. ~or convenience, the ramp wave-form generated by ramp generator 76 may be referred to as the ~set point raMpn. The set point ramp wave-form is shown in Figure 4.
Although the set point ramp may be generated in a con-ventional manner, it must be emphasized that the set point ramp of the present invention is not a conventional loss-in-weight set point ramp. The set point ramp of the present invention differs from a conventional set point ramp primarily in that no portion of the set point ramp of the present invention corresponds to the period of time a feeder is being refilled. Each cycle of the present set point ramp represents the loss in weight of one or the other of feeders 16 and 18 during discharge. Other differ-ences between the-set point ramp of the present invention and the prior art are shown in Figure 5.
Instead of utilizing the integrating type of controller described above (i.e. 9 generating a set-point ramp and comparing slope), a differentiating type of controller may be used without departing from the scope of the invention. Differentiating con-¦¦ trollers, which generate a fixed setpoint and measure actual massflow by computing weight loss over a period of time, are well-known in the art and need not be described in detail.
1l ~ 9 ~
.
~IZ16~i7 One output of controller 58 is a drive command fre~uen-cy, which is a series of'pulses representative of the speed at which eeder motors 20 and 22 must be driven to obtain an actual mass flow rate equal to the desired mass flow rate selected at control panel 54. The weight output signal from selector 72 is compared to the set point ramp in comparator circuit 78. Cumpar-ator circuit 78 is a conventional comparator circuit which corn-pares the instantaneous slope of the weight output signal with the instantaneous slope of the set point rarnp and generates an error signal E representative of the difference between the weight output signals and the set point ramp. Error signal E is sent to pulse generator 80, which generates a series of pulses called the drive command signa'l, shown in Figure 3 as the Drive C~D Freq. The frequency of the pulses varies wjth the error signal E so that, for example, when the error signal F indicates an actual mass flow rate greater than desired, the frequency of the pulses decreases, causing feed motors 20 and 22 to run more slowly and thus reduce actual mass flow rate. Conversely, if the error signal E indicates a mass flow rate less than desired, the frequency of the pulses increases, causing motors 20 and 22 to run faster and thus increase actuai mass flow rate. Error signal E also controls the speed of feed motor 14 associated with pre-feeder 12 so that the speeds of motors 20 and 22 and the speed of motor 14 increase or decrease in the same proportion. The rela-tionship between motors 20 and 22 and motor 14 is discussed more fully below. The relation between the error signal E and the fre-~quency of the puls'es is shown in Figure 6. The way in which the ¦
I . ' .
' - 10-.
lZl6~1~7 error signal and the drive comnand signal may be generated will ¦be understood by those versed in the art.
¦ It should also be understood that, although the drive ¦command signal described herein is a series of pulses controlled ¦by the error signal E, the drive command signal could be a vol-¦ tage, current or any other signal generated in response to errorsignal E for controlling the motors 14, 20 and 22 without départ-inK from the scope of the inYention.
The other output of controlLer 58 is the A/B SELECT
signal. The A/B SELECT signal is a square wave having a period twice that of the set point ramp. Each transition of the A/B
SELECT signal causes diverter valve 30 to change position. Like-wise, each transition causes selector circuit 72 to switch from ¦ one weight signal to the other, as will be explained more fully below. The transitions of the A/B SELECT signal occur at the respective minimum weights of feeders 16 and 18, as shown in ~ Figure 4. As presently preferred, the .weight signal from selector circuit 72 is split in controller 58 and is sent simul-taneously to comparator circuit 78 (as described above) and to level detector 82. Leyei detector 82 is a conventional level detecting circuit. U~en level detector 82 senses that the weight ~¦ signal from selector circuit 72 is at a minimum, it signals a logic element 84, shown in Figure 3 as a flip-flop but which can ! be any suitable logic element, to change state. The output of logic element 84 is the A/B SELECT signal.
The drive com~and frequency output of controller 58 is sent to two identical frequency/analog converters 60 and 62J
, . .
" - 11 - ' I
~ lZ16B67 where the drive command frequency is converted to an analog Yol~
tage represent~tive of desired feed motor speed. Frequencg/analog converters are conventional elements and need not be described further. The outputs of frequency/analog converters 60 and 62 are sent to motor drive circuits 68 and 70 respectively. Motor drive circuits 68 and 70 are conventional circuits. Any conven-tional motor and motor drive may be used.
The output of motor drive circuit 68 drives feed motors 20 and 22 associated with feeders 16 and 18 respectively. Feed motors 20 and 22 are driven in parallel, so that both motors 20 and 22 are driven at precisely the same speed. The output of motor drive circuit 70 drives feed motor 14 associated with pre-feeder 12. Were it not for variable resistors 64 and 66, feed motor 14 would necessarily be driven at the same speed as feed motors 20 and 22, because the same drive command frequency from controller 58 is used to control all three motors. Variable resistors 64 and 66 are provided to "trim" the speeds of the motors so that prefeeder motor 14 may be caused to run more slowly than feed motors 20 and 22. This is to ensure that the maximum volumetric flow of prefeeder 12 will be less than the maximum volumetric flow of feeders 16 and 18, so that there is no possibility of overfeeding feeders 16 and 18 or of accumulating¦
material in the feeders.
All t~ree motors are run continuously when the system is in operation and, because all are driven by the same drivel comnand frequency, the motors "track" each other. That is, the¦
speeds of motors 20 and 22 and the speed of motor 14 increase or , ~Z~iL6867 decrease in the same proportion. The precise speeds of feed motors 14, 20 and 22 are not crîtical so long as (1) the speed of motor 14 is less than the speed of motors 20 and 22 so that maxi-mum vo}umetric flow of prefeeder 12 is preferably less than or equal to 80% of maximum volurnetric flow of feeders 16 and 18, and t2) the speed of motor 14 "tracks" the speed of motors 20 and 22 so that the ratio of volumetric flow of prefeeder 12 to volume-tric flow of feeders 16 and 18 remains constant, preventing stor-age in feeders 16 and 18 and minimizing prefeeder-to-collector delay in feed rate adjustments.
In the illustrated embodiment, and as presently pre-ferred, the motor speed control is operated in an "open loop"
configuration. That is, no feèdback of motor speed information I is used to control motor speed. Motor speed is controlled by comparing the loss-in-weight signal representative of material fed from feeders 16 and 18 to the set point ramp signal generated by control panel 54. However, it should be understood that a closed loop motor control with motor speed feedback may be used for even greater accuracy if desired.
The weight output signals of scales 24 and 26 (weight "A~ and weight "B" signals, respectively) are sent to selector circuit 72, which is a conventional time multiplexing circuit.
The output of selector circuit 72 is described more fully below.
The output of selector circuit 72 is sent to controller 58, where, as shown in Figure 3, it is compared to the set point ramp¦
generated by control panel 54 to generate the drive command fre-¦ quency signal.
- 13 - , I
' ' i .
' lZ~ 7 Selector circuit 72 is controlled by the A/B SELECT
signal output of controller 58. The A/B SELECT signal causes selector circuit 72 to alternately transmit the discharge por-tions of the weight output signals of scales 24 and 26 to con-troller 58 for comparison to the set point ramp in proper ti~ed relationship as discussed more fully below. The A/B SELECT signal is also sent to diverter valve control circuit 74, which actuates diverter solenoid 32 so- that the selector circuit 72 and the diverter valve control circuit 74 are operated in synchronism.
Referring to ~igure 4, the weight and control signals are shown in their time relationship. All of the signals shown in Figure 4 have been ideàlized for the sake of clarity. In actual practice, the signals shown in Figure 4 may differ from their idealized form without departing from the instant inven-tion. As described in connection with Figure l, diverter valve 30 is operated to cause feeders 16 and 18 to be filled alternate-ly. Thus, for example, when diverter valve 30 is in the first position, material is added to feeder 16 and the weight of feeder 16 will increase as indicated by the top curve in ~igure 4 (weight "A" signal). Meanwhile, the material in feeder 18 is being discharged, and the weight of feeder 18 will decrease, as shown in the third curve in ~igure 4 (weight "B" signal). When controller 52 senses that the weight of feeder 18 has reached a preselected minimum, (point "a" on the weight "B" signal curve), the A/B SELECT signal changes state and causes diverter valve 30 to move to its second position 30', halting the flow of material to feeder 16. Because feed motor 20 is run continuously, the Il . . ~i ~16867 material which was added to feeder 16 will now begin to dis~
charge, and the weight of material in feeder 16 decreases (frorn point l'a" to point "bl' on the weight "A" signal curve). The rate at which material is added to feeder 16 ~i.e. the discharge rate of prefeeder 12) is chosen to equal the discharge rate of feeder 16. Thus, since input and output rates are equal, there is no storage of material in feeder 16. The feed rate of feeder l6 is chosen such that material begins to be discharged from feeder 16 at precisely the same moment that diverter valve 30 changes posi-tion to 30' and feeder 18 begins filling.
At point "b" on the weight "A" signal curve~ feeder 16 has discharged all of the ~aterial contained therein. When con-troller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 16 has reached a preselected mlnimum, the A/B SELFCT signal again changes state and causes diverter valve 30 to move from its second position 30' to the first position. Material now begins to refill feeder 16. The weight of material in feeder 16 therefore begins to increase from point nb" to point "c" on the curve, repeating the above-described cycle.
As shown by the second curve in ~igure 4, while feeder 16 is discharging (between points na~ and 'Ib"), the flow of material from feeder 16 is constant. While feeder 16 is being¦
filled (between points nbn and nct'), the flow from feeder 16 is zero. Feeder 18 behaves in the identical manner as feeder 16, except that, because it is filled alternately, the curves repre-senting the change in weight of material in feeder 18 and the¦
discharge of feeder 18 are shifted in time relationship by 180¦
from the curves for feeder 16.
i:Zl~;8~;~
The fifth curve in Pigure 4 is the set point ramp signal generated by control panel 54. The set point r~m~ sign'al ¦,is a negative-going ramp with a period T equal to the period of time feeders 16 and 18 require to discharge the material con~' tained therein to obtain the desired m~ss flow rate selected at control panel 54. The seventh curve ,in Figure 3 is the output from selector circuit 72. Selector circuit 72 selects the weight "A" and weight "B" signals from scales 24 and 26 so that only the portion of the weight "A" and weight "B" signàls during discharge of the associated feeder are utilized. Each transition of the A/B SELECT signal (the si~th curve in Figure 4) causes selecto~
circuit 72 to switch from one weight signal to,the other. The set point ram~ and the weight output from selector circuit 72 are compared in controller 58 to generate the drive command frequency as described above.
The flow of m~terial through feéder 16, for example, may be readily understood by reference to Figure 4. The flow of mate'rial through feeder 18 is identical to that of feeder 16.
The speed of feed screw 15 is substantially constant in order to achieve a constant feed rate. Since the speed of feed screw 15 is constant, the transit time of material through feeder 16 is constant. The speed of feed screw 15 is chosen so that material added to inlet 46 of feeder 16 at time to reaches outlet 50 at~
time to + T. That is, the transit time of material from inlet 461 to outlet 50 is ~. It will also be observed from Figure 4 that diverter valve,30 is moved after each period T of the set point ramp~ Thus, since the transit time is T, material added to the 1,~ ' ' ' .
~ 16 -~ lZ16867 feeder during one period is discharged during the next period (when no material is added to eeder 16). Material addéd to feeder 16 at the beginning of a period T will transit feeder 16 in that period, reaching outlet 50 at the beginning of the next period. M~terial added at the end of a period T will transit the feeder during the next period and will reach outlet 50 at the end of that next period. Thus,. there will be no storage of material in feeders 16 or 18.
When the system is initially started, controller 58 signals selector circuit 72 (by means of the A/B SELECT signal) to send to controller 58 the weight signal from a preselected one of feeders 16 and 18, for example, feeder 18. .ThusJ the system always begins by "looking at" .the weight signal of a preselected scale, in this example, always scale 26. If there is no material in feeder 18 (for example, because diverter valve 30 is in the first position), the weight signal from scale 26 will be at its minimum, corresponding to point "a" on the weight "B" signal curve in Figure 4. Accordingly, controller 58 is programmed to cause diverter valYe 30 to move to thè second position 30' to begin filling feeder 18. Diverter valve 30 remains in the second posit;on 30' until controller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 18 is at a preselected maximum. At that point, diverter valve 30 is moved to the first position, feeder 16 begins filling and feeder 18 begins discharging.
~ en controller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 18 .
is at the minimum, it signals (by means of the A/B SELEC~ signal) diverter valve control 74 to energize solenoid 32. Diverter _ 17 _ 1.
~i ' ~Z~686~ ~
valve 30 is thereby moved to the second position 30l and materi~l being discharged by pre~eeder 12 is diverted to feeder 18 to begin filling it. Simultaneoulsy, controller 58 signals selector circuit 72 to transmit to controller 58 the weight signal ~rom scale 24. The material in feeder 16 is now discharged until feeder 16 is empty and the weigh~ of feeder 16 is at a minimum.
While feeder 16 is discharging, feeder 18 is being filled. When feeder 16 is emptyj feeder 18 will be at its maximum weight.
When controller 58 senses that the weight of feeder 16 is at the minimum~ it signals diverter valve 74 to de~energize solenoid 32. Diverter valve 30 is returned to the first position and the material being discharged by prefeeder 12 is now diverted to feeder 16, which begins to fill while feeder 18 begins to dis-charge. This cycle then repeats as long as the system remains in operation. The way in which controller 58 may be programmed to carry out the above-described functions will be readily apparent to persons familiar with loss-in-weight feeding systems and need not be described here in detail.
As presently preferred, controller 58 senses minimum and maximum weights of feeders 16 and 18 by conventional level detecting techniques. However, it is understood that any other method of sensing minimum or maximum such as computing change of slope~ for example, may be employed without departing from the instant invention.
By utilizing the weight output of scales 24 and 26 only while their associated feeders 16 and 18, respectively, are dis-char~ing, controller 58 is able to make pure loss-in-weight mea-¦
SUreMentS on the discharging feeder. Controller 58 is al~ays performing pure loss-in-weight measurements on one of the two ., i , ~Z16~67 feeders~ so that there is no period of time in which the system must be operated in volumetric control.
It should be understood th~t the in~ention is not limited to the use of two feeders operating at ~ fifty percent duty cycle. Por example, feeder 16 may have twice the capacity of feeder 18. In this case, the system would operate with feeder 16 on a duty cycle of 2/3 and feeder 18 on a duty cycle of 1/3 to provide a constant feed rate. Likewise, for example, four feeders of equal capacity m~y be used, each operating on Q duty cycle of twenty-five percent. Thus, any arrangement of feeder capacity, number of feeders and duty cycles may be employed with-out departing from the scope of the present invention.
It is also possible to operate the system using only a single scale. For example, scale 26 may be eliminated. In this embodiment, loss-in-weight measurements are made on feeder 16 during the period of time it is discharging. That is, weight signal "A" is compared to the set point ramp by controller 58 while feeder 16 is discharging. -The result of the comparison (error signal E) is stored, in conventional fashion, in memory within controller 58. ~hen feeder 16 is empty, diverter valve 30 is moved to the first position as already described, feeder 16 begins to refill and feeder 18 begins to discharge. However, in this embodiment, instead of compari~g weight signal ~'B" to the set point ramp when feeder 18 is discharging, controller 58 recalls from memory error signal E stored when feeder 16 was discharging. The recalled error signal ~ from feeder 16 is used to control th~e speed of feed motor 22 in feeder 18. That is, ~Z168~i7 because feeders 16 and 18 are identical, it is assu~ed that the weight signal "A" during discharge of feeder 16 is identical to the weight signal "B" when feeder 18 is discharging. Thus, both feeders 16 and 18 are controlled by the weight signal of one of them. The error signal E is updated for each discharge cycle of feeder l6.
This embodiment is of course inherently less accurate than the first-described embodiment because during the time feeder 18 is discharging no actual loss-in-weight measurements are being made. Thus, during the time feeder 18 is discharging, the system actually is operating in what may be called '~quasi-gravimetric" control, which is an approximation of gravimetric control, rather than true gravimetric controi. However, this embodiment is also less complex than the first embodiment, and for certain applications may provide suitable accuracy.
The present invention may be embodied in.other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential attributes thereof and, according-ly, reference should be made to the append-ed claims, rather than to the foregoing specification, as indi-cating the scope of the invention.
~1~ ' .
1~ . .
~ . ' !
1,l
Claims (34)
1. A loss-in-weight feeding system comprising:
a plurality of means for receiving material and discharging said material at a controlled rate;
means for providing a representation of a predeter-mined discharge rate;
means for selectively and successively providing a representation of the weight of material in each of said plural-ity of means;
means for successively comparing said representation of a predetermined discharge rate with a representation of the weight of material in each of said plurality of means for con-trolling each of said plurality of means to successively discharge material from each of said plurality of means at a dis-charge rate equal to said predetermined discharge rate; and means for successively feeding material at a con-trolled rate to each of said plurality of means when it is not discharging.
a plurality of means for receiving material and discharging said material at a controlled rate;
means for providing a representation of a predeter-mined discharge rate;
means for selectively and successively providing a representation of the weight of material in each of said plural-ity of means;
means for successively comparing said representation of a predetermined discharge rate with a representation of the weight of material in each of said plurality of means for con-trolling each of said plurality of means to successively discharge material from each of said plurality of means at a dis-charge rate equal to said predetermined discharge rate; and means for successively feeding material at a con-trolled rate to each of said plurality of means when it is not discharging.
2. The system of claim 1 further wherein said means for feeding is responsive to said representation of a predetermined discharge rate and feeds said material at a controlled rate equal to said predetermined discharge rate.
3. A loss-in-weight feeding system comprising:
first means for receiving material and discharging said material at a controlled rate;
second means for receiving material and discharging said material at a controlled rate;
means for providing a representation of a predeter-mined discharge rate; and means responsive to said representation and to the weight of material in said first and second means for controlling said first and second means to continuously discharge material alternately from said first and second means at a continuous discharge rate substantially equal to said predetermined dis-charge rate.
first means for receiving material and discharging said material at a controlled rate;
second means for receiving material and discharging said material at a controlled rate;
means for providing a representation of a predeter-mined discharge rate; and means responsive to said representation and to the weight of material in said first and second means for controlling said first and second means to continuously discharge material alternately from said first and second means at a continuous discharge rate substantially equal to said predetermined dis-charge rate.
4. The system of claim 3 further including third means, responsive to said controlling means, for feeding material alter-nately to each of said first and second means at a controlled rate when it is not discharging.
5. The system of claim 4 wherein said means for con-trolling includes means for providing an indication of the weight of the discharging one of said first and second means, means for comparing said weight indication with said representation, and means responsive to said comparison for maintaining the discharge rate of the discharging one of said first and second means at said predetermined discharge rate.
6. The system of claim 3 further including third means for feeding material alternately to each of said first and second means at a controlled rate, said means for controlling including means for providing a representation of the weight of said first means during discharge of said material, means for providing a representation of the weight of said second means during discharge of said material, and means for comparing said repre-sentation of said predetermined discharge rate with said representation of weight from the discharging one of said first and second means to maintain said discharge rate of the discharg-ing one of said first and second means at said predetermined discharge rate.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein said controlling means further includes means for causing said third means to feed material to one of said first and second means while the other of said first and second means is discharging material.
8. The system of claim 7 wherein said means for causing is responsive to a predetermined minimum weight of the discharg-ing one of said first and second means for feeding material to said one of said first and second means.
9. The system of claim 7 wherein said means for causing is constructed to cause said third means to feed material alter-nately to the first and second means for substantially equal periods of time.
10. The system of claim 7 wherein each of said first, second and third means are coupled such that said controlled rate and each of said discharge rates of said first and second means are maintained substantially equal to said predetermined dis-charge rate.
11. A loss-in-weight material feeding system comprising:
first means for receiving and discharging material;
at least second and third means for receiving mater-ial from said first means and dlscharging said received material;
means for alternately feeding material discharged from said first means to said at least second and third means;
means for generating first and second signals repre-sentative of the weight of material in a respective one of said second and third means;
means for generating a reference signal representa-tive of a desired material flow rate;
means for alternately comparing said reference signal with said first and second signals; and means for controlling said second and third means in response to said comparison with said first and second signals, respectively, to alternately control the discharge of material from said second and third means, respectively.
first means for receiving and discharging material;
at least second and third means for receiving mater-ial from said first means and dlscharging said received material;
means for alternately feeding material discharged from said first means to said at least second and third means;
means for generating first and second signals repre-sentative of the weight of material in a respective one of said second and third means;
means for generating a reference signal representa-tive of a desired material flow rate;
means for alternately comparing said reference signal with said first and second signals; and means for controlling said second and third means in response to said comparison with said first and second signals, respectively, to alternately control the discharge of material from said second and third means, respectively.
12. The system of claim 11 wherein said means for con-trolling is coupled to said means for feeding such that said first means discharges material into one of said second and third means while the other of said second and third means is con-trolled in response to said comparison between the reference signal and the associated signal representative of the weight of that means.
13. The system of claim 12 wherein said means for con-trolling controls said second and third means for discharging its material at substantially said desired material flow rate, and said means for feeding feeds material alternately to said second and third means for substantially equal periods of time.
14. The system of claim 11 wherein said means for con-trolling controls the rate of discharging of said first means and the rate of discharging of said second and third means so that they are substantially equal.
15. The system of claim 11 wherein said means for con-trolling controls said means for feeding such that said material from said first means is supplied to one of said second and third means different from the one of said second and third means being controlled by said comparison.
16. The system of claim 11 wherein said first, second and third means each includes a motor driven feeder for discharg-ing material.
17. The system of claim 16 wherein said control means is coupled to drive the motors of said first, second and third means with a common control signal.
. 18. The system of claim 11 further including means for maintaining the ratio of volumetric flow of the first means to volumetric flow of the second and third means substantially con-stant.
19. The system of claim 18 wherein said means for main-taining maintains said ratio at a value less than one.
20. The system of claim 11 wherein said means for gener-ating a reference signal generates a sawtooth wave-form having a slope representative of the desired material flow rate.
21. The system of claim 11 wherein said means for gener-ating a reference signal comprises means for generating a set point ramp.
22. The system of claim 11 wherein said means for gener-ating generates a reference signal representing a desired change in material weight with respect to time.
23. A continuous loss-in-weight material feeding system comprising:
a prefeeder for receiving and discharging material;
at least first and second feeders for receiving material from said prefeeder and discharging the received mater-ial to a common collector;
means for diverting discharged material from said prefeeder to said first feeder in a first position of the divert-ing means and to said second feeder in a second position of the diverting means different than the first position;
means for generating first and second signals repre-sentative of the weight of material in said first and second feeders respectively, means for generating a reference signal representa-tive of a desired material flow rate;
means for alternately comparing said reference sig-nal to one of said first and second weight signals synchronous with the discharge of material from the prefeeder to the other of said first and second feeders; and means for controlling the discharge of material from each of said first and second feeders based on the comparison of said reference signal with the first and second weight signals, respectively, to maintain the material discharge rate of that feeder at said desired material flow rate.
a prefeeder for receiving and discharging material;
at least first and second feeders for receiving material from said prefeeder and discharging the received mater-ial to a common collector;
means for diverting discharged material from said prefeeder to said first feeder in a first position of the divert-ing means and to said second feeder in a second position of the diverting means different than the first position;
means for generating first and second signals repre-sentative of the weight of material in said first and second feeders respectively, means for generating a reference signal representa-tive of a desired material flow rate;
means for alternately comparing said reference sig-nal to one of said first and second weight signals synchronous with the discharge of material from the prefeeder to the other of said first and second feeders; and means for controlling the discharge of material from each of said first and second feeders based on the comparison of said reference signal with the first and second weight signals, respectively, to maintain the material discharge rate of that feeder at said desired material flow rate.
24. The system of claim 23 wherein said means for di-verting is responsive to said means for controlling to maintain said means for diverting in said first and second positions for substantially equal periods of time.
25. The system of claim 23 wherein said controlling means controls the discharge rate of said prefeeder and the dis-charge rate of each of said first and second feeders so that they are substantially equal to one another and to said desired mater-ial flow rate.
26. The system of claim 23 wherein said prefeeder and said first and second feeders are coupled to said controlling means such that the discharge rate of each is controlled by a common signal.
27. The system of claim 23 wherein said means for gener-ating a reference signal generates a ramp signal indicative of material flow rate.
28. The system of claim 23 wherein said means for gener-ating a reference signal comprises generating a signal represent-ing a desired change in rate with respect to time.
29. The system of claim 28 wherein said means for gener-ating said first and second signals comprises means for generat-ing first and second signals representative of the change in weight of said first and second feeders with respect to time.
30. A loss-in-weight feeding system comprising:
means for discharging material from a first source;
means for alternately feeding material discharged from the first source to second and third sources;
valve means for alternately discharging material from said second and third sources to a common source;
means for detecting the weight of material in said second and third sources during discharging of material therefrom and for generating a signal indicative thereof;
means for generating a reference signal representing a desired material discharge rate;
means for comparing the reference signal with the signal indicative of weight; and means for alternately controlling the discharge of material from said second and third sources in response to said comparison.
means for discharging material from a first source;
means for alternately feeding material discharged from the first source to second and third sources;
valve means for alternately discharging material from said second and third sources to a common source;
means for detecting the weight of material in said second and third sources during discharging of material therefrom and for generating a signal indicative thereof;
means for generating a reference signal representing a desired material discharge rate;
means for comparing the reference signal with the signal indicative of weight; and means for alternately controlling the discharge of material from said second and third sources in response to said comparison.
31. A technique for loss-in-weight material feeding comprising:
discharging material from a first source;
alternately feeding material, discharged from said first source to at least second and third sources;
alternately discharging material from said second and third sources to a common source;
detecting the weight of material in each of said second and third sources;
generating signals indicative of the weight of material in said second and third sources respectively;
generating a reference signal representative of a desired material discharge rate;
alternately comparing said reference signal with each of said signals indicative of the weight of said second and third sources; and controlling the discharge of material from the dis-charging one of said second and third sources in response to said comparison to cause the rate of discharge from that source to be equal to the desired material discharge rate during the time that material from said first source is being fed to the other of said first and second sources.
discharging material from a first source;
alternately feeding material, discharged from said first source to at least second and third sources;
alternately discharging material from said second and third sources to a common source;
detecting the weight of material in each of said second and third sources;
generating signals indicative of the weight of material in said second and third sources respectively;
generating a reference signal representative of a desired material discharge rate;
alternately comparing said reference signal with each of said signals indicative of the weight of said second and third sources; and controlling the discharge of material from the dis-charging one of said second and third sources in response to said comparison to cause the rate of discharge from that source to be equal to the desired material discharge rate during the time that material from said first source is being fed to the other of said first and second sources.
32. The technique of claim 31 wherein said feeding step includes diverting material to each of said first and second feeders for substantially equal periods of time.
33. The technique of claim 31 wherein said step of dis-charging material from said first source comprises discharging material at a rate substantially equal to the rate at which material is discharged from said second and third sources.
34. A technique for loss-in-weight material feeding comprising:
discharging material from a first source;
alternately feeding material discharged from said first source to at least second and third sources;
alternately continuously discharging material from said second and third sources to a common source;
detecting the weight of material in one of said second and third sources during said discharging and generating a signal indicative thereof;
generating a reference signal representing a desired material discharge rate;
comparing said reference signal with said signal indicative of weight; and alternately controlling the discharge of material from each of said second and third sources in response to said comparison.
discharging material from a first source;
alternately feeding material discharged from said first source to at least second and third sources;
alternately continuously discharging material from said second and third sources to a common source;
detecting the weight of material in one of said second and third sources during said discharging and generating a signal indicative thereof;
generating a reference signal representing a desired material discharge rate;
comparing said reference signal with said signal indicative of weight; and alternately controlling the discharge of material from each of said second and third sources in response to said comparison.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US491,708 | 1983-05-05 | ||
| US06/491,708 US4579252A (en) | 1983-05-05 | 1983-05-05 | Loss-in-weight gravimetric feeder |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1216867A true CA1216867A (en) | 1987-01-20 |
Family
ID=23953324
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA000448618A Expired CA1216867A (en) | 1983-05-05 | 1984-03-01 | Loss-in-weight gravimetric feeder |
Country Status (4)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4579252A (en) |
| JP (1) | JPS59203013A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1216867A (en) |
| DE (1) | DE3408191A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2005124295A1 (en) * | 2004-06-16 | 2005-12-29 | Uas Canada Inc. | Apparatus and method for substantially continous delivery of a substantially constant weight of material per unit of time from a bulk storage location and for weighing, blending, and mixing conveyable materials |
| US7124434B2 (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2006-10-17 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. | Information transmission system, and information sending apparatus and information receiving apparatus used therein |
Families Citing this family (48)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FR2575825B1 (en) * | 1985-01-04 | 1987-04-17 | Saint Gobain Vitrage | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DOSING POWDERY MATERIALS |
| JPS61165558A (en) * | 1985-04-16 | 1986-07-26 | 株式会社デンソー | Air-cooling refrigerating device for car |
| US4796782A (en) * | 1985-10-30 | 1989-01-10 | Automation, Inc. | Ink monitor system |
| US4921132A (en) * | 1985-10-30 | 1990-05-01 | Automation, Inc. | Ink motor system |
| US4750530A (en) * | 1986-04-18 | 1988-06-14 | Reliance Electric Company | Bulk materials loading system |
| US4804111A (en) * | 1987-02-20 | 1989-02-14 | Acrison, Inc. | Mechanism for metering solid materials which flow in a manner similar to liquids |
| US5260880A (en) * | 1987-08-04 | 1993-11-09 | Accurate, Inc. | Loss-in-weight feeder system |
| US4882784A (en) * | 1987-11-04 | 1989-11-21 | Moksnes Manufacturing Co., Inc. | Loss-in-weight feeder system |
| DE68902909T2 (en) * | 1988-02-18 | 1993-03-18 | Acrison Inc | BALANCED WEIGHING SYSTEM FOR MATERIALS IN FREE FLOW. |
| US4867343A (en) * | 1988-02-18 | 1989-09-19 | Acrison, Inc. | Wild-flow loss-in-weight weighing system |
| WO1989010872A1 (en) * | 1988-05-02 | 1989-11-16 | Ohaus Corporation | High-resolution weigher/feeder for fine particulate materials |
| US4945957A (en) * | 1988-05-02 | 1990-08-07 | Ohaus Corporation | High-resolution weigher/feeder for fine particulate materials |
| US5435189A (en) * | 1990-02-02 | 1995-07-25 | Buhler Ag | Device, method and use of the method for determining a production flow |
| US5527107A (en) * | 1990-02-02 | 1996-06-18 | Buehler Ag | Plant for continuous mixing and homgenization |
| US5184754A (en) * | 1990-10-18 | 1993-02-09 | Hansen Thomas N | Weight-controlled particulate matter feed system |
| DE4037249A1 (en) * | 1990-11-23 | 1992-05-27 | Buehler Ag | Weighing of principal component e.g. of chocolate on industrial scale - by delivering material, such as cocoa butter, in turn to number of batch weighers and automatically adding wt. signals together |
| JP2661838B2 (en) * | 1992-04-28 | 1997-10-08 | エスオーエンジニアリング株式会社 | Screw feeder-type fixed quantity cutting device |
| DE4331057C1 (en) * | 1993-09-13 | 1995-01-12 | Gericke Gmbh | Optimising the stirrer rotational speed in a mechanical metering device |
| US5423456A (en) * | 1994-01-03 | 1995-06-13 | Larry V. Arendonk | Apparatus for continuous flow weighing |
| FR2732553B1 (en) * | 1995-04-07 | 1997-07-11 | Garcia De Acilu Jose Javier Re | PELLET DOSING MACHINE FOR PALMIPED FATTENING |
| GB2306681A (en) * | 1995-11-02 | 1997-05-07 | Spiroflow Ltd | Apparatus for the mixing of materials and a method therefor |
| US6109478A (en) * | 1997-10-24 | 2000-08-29 | Eskom | Conveying of materials |
| US6060667A (en) * | 1998-03-24 | 2000-05-09 | Pollock; John | Method and apparatus for supplying predefined quantities of bulk material |
| FI107525B (en) | 1998-05-29 | 2001-08-31 | Raute Prec Oy | A method of feeding a finely divided substance |
| DE10049043A1 (en) * | 2000-10-04 | 2002-05-02 | Generis Gmbh | Process for unpacking molded articles embedded in unbound particulate material |
| DE10117875C1 (en) * | 2001-04-10 | 2003-01-30 | Generis Gmbh | Method, device for applying fluids and use of such a device |
| DE10216013B4 (en) * | 2002-04-11 | 2006-12-28 | Generis Gmbh | Method and device for applying fluids |
| DE10222167A1 (en) * | 2002-05-20 | 2003-12-04 | Generis Gmbh | Device for supplying fluids |
| DE10224981B4 (en) | 2002-06-05 | 2004-08-19 | Generis Gmbh | Process for building models in layers |
| US7807077B2 (en) * | 2003-06-16 | 2010-10-05 | Voxeljet Technology Gmbh | Methods and systems for the manufacture of layered three-dimensional forms |
| FI117769B (en) * | 2004-01-15 | 2007-02-15 | Outokumpu Technology Oyj | Slurry furnace feed system |
| DE102004008168B4 (en) | 2004-02-19 | 2015-12-10 | Voxeljet Ag | Method and device for applying fluids and use of the device |
| US7191919B2 (en) * | 2004-09-01 | 2007-03-20 | Acrison, Inc. | Weight-loss weigh feeder with pressure compensation |
| US7534970B2 (en) * | 2006-06-15 | 2009-05-19 | Schenck Accurate, Inc. | Counterbalanced dispensing system |
| DE102006038858A1 (en) * | 2006-08-20 | 2008-02-21 | Voxeljet Technology Gmbh | Self-hardening material and method for layering models |
| JP2008129513A (en) * | 2006-11-24 | 2008-06-05 | Brother Ind Ltd | Image forming apparatus |
| DE102007050679A1 (en) * | 2007-10-21 | 2009-04-23 | Voxeljet Technology Gmbh | Method and device for conveying particulate material in the layered construction of models |
| DE102009030113A1 (en) | 2009-06-22 | 2010-12-23 | Voxeljet Technology Gmbh | Method and device for supplying fluids during the layering of models |
| DE102010014969A1 (en) | 2010-04-14 | 2011-10-20 | Voxeljet Technology Gmbh | Device for producing three-dimensional models |
| DE102010027071A1 (en) | 2010-07-13 | 2012-01-19 | Voxeljet Technology Gmbh | Device for producing three-dimensional models by means of layer application technology |
| US9861027B2 (en) | 2010-12-08 | 2018-01-09 | Bayer Cropscience, Lp | Seed treatment systems and methods |
| US9959511B2 (en) | 2010-12-08 | 2018-05-01 | Bayer Cropscience Lp | Retail point seed treatment systems and methods |
| US9877424B2 (en) | 2010-12-08 | 2018-01-30 | Bayer Cropscience, Lp | Seed treatment facilities, methods and apparatus |
| DE102010056346A1 (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2012-07-05 | Technische Universität München | Method for the layered construction of models |
| DE102011007957A1 (en) | 2011-01-05 | 2012-07-05 | Voxeljet Technology Gmbh | Device and method for constructing a layer body with at least one body limiting the construction field and adjustable in terms of its position |
| CN104130131B (en) * | 2013-05-01 | 2018-05-29 | 英威达纺织（英国）有限公司 | The preparation of the nylon salt solution carried out from partial equilibrium acid solution |
| JP2018183817A (en) * | 2018-06-20 | 2018-11-22 | ヘーエーアー プロセス エンジニアリング ナームロゼ フェンノートシャップ | Method for continuous production of tablets, tableting system for carrying out the method, and use of the tableting system for the production of tablets of at least two ingredients containing particles with a significant difference in particle size |
| US11504879B2 (en) | 2020-04-17 | 2022-11-22 | Beehive Industries, LLC | Powder spreading apparatus and system |
Family Cites Families (15)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US1354747A (en) * | 1920-10-05 | hiller | ||
| US600031A (en) * | 1898-03-01 | Weighing apparatus or plant | ||
| US2652984A (en) * | 1949-05-05 | 1953-09-22 | Safety Car Heating & Lighting | Flow control apparatus for bulk products |
| US3081588A (en) * | 1960-06-28 | 1963-03-19 | Delta Engineering Corp | Apparatus for conveying and filling containers |
| US3303966A (en) * | 1962-06-08 | 1967-02-14 | Vandale Corp | Bunk feeder or the like |
| US3497109A (en) * | 1967-06-05 | 1970-02-24 | Thurman H Leach | Apparatus for dispensing feed |
| US3690392A (en) * | 1970-02-24 | 1972-09-12 | Great Western Sugar Co The | Continuous flow scale with preliminary volumetric measurement |
| US3762451A (en) * | 1971-11-19 | 1973-10-02 | R Anderson | Apparatus for filling moving containers |
| US3734215A (en) * | 1972-05-02 | 1973-05-22 | Great Western Sugar Co | Continuous flow scale with alternating volumetric measuring and weighing chambers |
| US3967758A (en) * | 1975-02-18 | 1976-07-06 | Acrison, Inc. | Automatically controlled weigh feeding apparatus |
| FR2292647A1 (en) * | 1974-11-28 | 1976-06-25 | Air Ind | FLOW DIVIDER FOR PULVERULENT PRODUCT |
| US4054784A (en) * | 1975-06-18 | 1977-10-18 | Ricciardi Ronald J | Weigh feeder system |
| US4266691A (en) * | 1978-07-11 | 1981-05-12 | Gero Industries, Inc. | Continuous automatic feeding apparatus |
| JPS5751623A (en) * | 1980-09-10 | 1982-03-26 | Mitsubishi Keikinzoku Kogyo Kk | Quantitative feeding method |
| JPS5757134A (en) * | 1980-09-20 | 1982-04-06 | Nisshin Flour Milling Co Ltd | Continuous flow meter for powdered granules and fixed-amount feeding apparatus |
-
1983
- 1983-05-05 US US06/491,708 patent/US4579252A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1984
- 1984-03-01 CA CA000448618A patent/CA1216867A/en not_active Expired
- 1984-03-02 JP JP59041210A patent/JPS59203013A/en active Pending
- 1984-03-06 DE DE19843408191 patent/DE3408191A1/en active Granted
Cited By (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7124434B2 (en) | 2003-07-17 | 2006-10-17 | Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd. | Information transmission system, and information sending apparatus and information receiving apparatus used therein |
| WO2005124295A1 (en) * | 2004-06-16 | 2005-12-29 | Uas Canada Inc. | Apparatus and method for substantially continous delivery of a substantially constant weight of material per unit of time from a bulk storage location and for weighing, blending, and mixing conveyable materials |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JPS59203013A (en) | 1984-11-17 |
| DE3408191C2 (en) | 1993-04-15 |
| US4579252A (en) | 1986-04-01 |
| DE3408191A1 (en) | 1984-11-15 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1216867A (en) | Loss-in-weight gravimetric feeder | |
| CA1099689A (en) | Weigh feeding apparatus | |
| USRE32101E (en) | Weigh feeding apparatus | |
| US4320855A (en) | Weigh feeding apparatus | |
| US4222448A (en) | Automatic batch weighing system | |
| US4454924A (en) | Combinatorial weighing apparatus | |
| US4880142A (en) | Powder weighing mixer and method thereof | |
| RU2086931C1 (en) | Method for recording product flow and device for effecting the same | |
| US4418771A (en) | Method and apparatus for combination weighing | |
| US5753868A (en) | Method and apparatus for gravimetric dosing and mixing of at least two components | |
| USRE32102E (en) | Weigh feeding apparatus | |
| CA1275863C (en) | Apparatus and method for feeding particulate material such as coal and other bulk materials | |
| US5121638A (en) | Method and device for recording the flow rate of a stream of bulk material | |
| US4585081A (en) | Method and apparatus for discharging weighing machines in combinatiorial weighing apparatus | |
| US4152645A (en) | Method and apparatus for producing an analogue output proportional to rotational speed employing digital to analogue conversion | |
| CA1156518A (en) | Metering of adhesive for coating chips, fibers and the like in the manufacture of composite panels | |
| US3511412A (en) | Apparatus for discharging particulate material | |
| JPS6256050B2 (en) | ||
| US4597405A (en) | Process and apparatus for controlling a controllable magnitude and use of the process | |
| SU1607953A1 (en) | Control system for trough vibrating batcher for ball mills | |
| SU1076765A1 (en) | Continuous action weighing-batching device for loose materials | |
| SU1265486A1 (en) | Continuous weigher | |
| SU1064152A1 (en) | Device for controlling loose material weighing batching | |
| SU1135706A2 (en) | Device for controlling hopper charging | |
| SU1500852A1 (en) | Method of controlling the process of portional weighing of loose materials |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |