CA1084248A - Compressive treatment of web materials - Google Patents
Compressive treatment of web materialsInfo
- Publication number
- CA1084248A CA1084248A CA289,033A CA289033A CA1084248A CA 1084248 A CA1084248 A CA 1084248A CA 289033 A CA289033 A CA 289033A CA 1084248 A CA1084248 A CA 1084248A
- Authority
- CA
- Canada
- Prior art keywords
- retarding
- web
- machine
- roll
- rolls
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D06—TREATMENT OF TEXTILES OR THE LIKE; LAUNDERING; FLEXIBLE MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D06C—FINISHING, DRESSING, TENTERING OR STRETCHING TEXTILE FABRICS
- D06C21/00—Shrinking by compressing
Abstract
ABSTRACT OF THE DISCLOSURE
Improved machine and method for longitudinal compressive treatment of webs employing a two roll drive nip. Specially ar-ranged initial parts of one or a pair of stationary retarding members are positioned at the exit side of the drive nip in the region of minor divergence of the roll surfaces to provide damming forces. The initial part of the retarding member, preferably a curved, resilient nipping element, is shaped to oppose the flow of the web. By its construction and position close to the line of centers of the rolls, it establishes a very compacted column ex-tending upstream to an initial treatment point continually located in the drive nip, between the moving surfaces of the rolls. In this region longitudinal compressive action occurs upon the web in a continuous and uniform manner, preferably with compensatory action in response to variations in the forces exerted by the compacted column of web. This compensatory action is provided by resilient deformation of a retarding member in the direction normal to the plane of the web, resilient adjustment movement of a retarding mem-ber in the direction away from the nip roll center line, and in some cases, by resilient response of the compacted material itself.
The retarding members may accomplish their resilient movement by swinging about the roll axes and by moving longitudinally of the web flow path. The retarding member, or the leading member of a pair, preferably, in the start-up position, has its initial part located upstream of the running position. Preferably, where a spring retarding member is used, its radius of curvature decreases abruptly toward its upstream end or is supported at its tip by a resilient pad; it is supported by a blade member on which its up-stream part may slide; it is continuous widthwise of the web being processed; it conforms to the curvature of the opposite roll when exposed directly to it; and it may have a roughened surface, in particular when only a single retarding member is employed. Vibra-tory, steaming and other advantageous treatment conditions are readily associated with the machine.
Improved machine and method for longitudinal compressive treatment of webs employing a two roll drive nip. Specially ar-ranged initial parts of one or a pair of stationary retarding members are positioned at the exit side of the drive nip in the region of minor divergence of the roll surfaces to provide damming forces. The initial part of the retarding member, preferably a curved, resilient nipping element, is shaped to oppose the flow of the web. By its construction and position close to the line of centers of the rolls, it establishes a very compacted column ex-tending upstream to an initial treatment point continually located in the drive nip, between the moving surfaces of the rolls. In this region longitudinal compressive action occurs upon the web in a continuous and uniform manner, preferably with compensatory action in response to variations in the forces exerted by the compacted column of web. This compensatory action is provided by resilient deformation of a retarding member in the direction normal to the plane of the web, resilient adjustment movement of a retarding mem-ber in the direction away from the nip roll center line, and in some cases, by resilient response of the compacted material itself.
The retarding members may accomplish their resilient movement by swinging about the roll axes and by moving longitudinally of the web flow path. The retarding member, or the leading member of a pair, preferably, in the start-up position, has its initial part located upstream of the running position. Preferably, where a spring retarding member is used, its radius of curvature decreases abruptly toward its upstream end or is supported at its tip by a resilient pad; it is supported by a blade member on which its up-stream part may slide; it is continuous widthwise of the web being processed; it conforms to the curvature of the opposite roll when exposed directly to it; and it may have a roughened surface, in particular when only a single retarding member is employed. Vibra-tory, steaming and other advantageous treatment conditions are readily associated with the machine.
Description
.;~rf'` ~ ~
Z~
ll Background of the Invention ~¦ This invention relates to fine, uniform longitudinal ¦¦ compressive treatment of webs and web-form materials for changing I thelr physical properties--trea-tmen-ts, for exa~ple, to provide Ishrink-resistance, stretchiness, increased density, softness, I texture, improved fiitering ~ction, and other properties to ¦ textile and textile-like, including non-woven, web materials.
Reference is made to prior art such as U. S. patents to Cluett 1,861,424; Wrigley et al~ 2,263,712; Barnard 2,958;608; Cohn et al. 3,015,145 and 3,015,146; Harmon 3,059,313 and the present inventor Walton 2,765,513; 2,765,514; 2,915,109; 3,260,778;
3,426,405; 3,B10,280; 2,869,7~8; and 3,975,806.
Prior machines have been successful for many webs and end uses, but have still presented serious deficiencies in other important applications, producing, for example, unwanted differences in the two sides of a web being treated, or shear across the thickness of the material, or crushing of the material in the direction of the web thickness.
In the case of shrink-proofing tubular knit dyed goods using available machines, physical differences in the two sides, hence dif~erences in the apparent color o~ the two sides, cause matching problems if apparel are made with the treated goods.
¦ In the case of compressively treating loosely bound bats of filter fibers using available machines, unwanted crushing in the direction of the web thickness can detrimentally affect physical properties and the filtering action of the final product.
Prior machines have also pxesented problems in ~nitial alignment of machine parts, in maintaining uniform settings ~'.
' ' ' . . . .
l, ~
1 throughout lon~ productlon runs, and in -the frequent need to ¦I replace parts subject to wear.
Il M~ny of the deficiencies oE prior machines noted above ¦! are traceable to the manner in which the drive forces are applied ¦I to the web to be treated. In commercially successful machines the drive often involves a single roll and a stationary s~oe which presses the web against the roll~ While this is successful in providing drive force, it does so only while also providing certain shear and crushing forces. As has long been realized, if a machine could be provided for present purposes employing a pair of drive rolls forming a driving nip for the web, these deficiencies could be avoided or eliminated. The problem o~
doing this, however, is not simple because the kind of treatment being sought is one of extreme fineness, to be applied very uniformly over the web, without producing destructive action, lint, or unwanted folds or crepes. At the same time the geometry provided by a pair of rolls is very limiting in respect to the space and manner of insertion of retarding members. With certain prior arrangements it has ~een found that retarding blades and the like cut the material, or the material goes beneath the edge of the blade and becomes snagged. In other cases the retarding members do not apply sufficient force to provide the fine, dense treatment desired, or spurting and uneven treatment, or detri-mental gross folds or unwanted superficial crepe occur.
Summary of the Invention General objects of the invention are to overcome these and related deficiencies of the prior art, while certain particular ob]ects are to provide a new compaction and shrink-., ~4~
1.
jproofing system for knitted goods, a new mechanical softeningjand compacting system for non-woven fabrics including those ~which are loosely formed, open or thick, and a new system for Igathering, splaying and otherwise condi-tioning the fiber assem-¦~lage in a web or bat.
¦ According to the invention, we have realized tha~~t~e driving rolls, the retarding de~ice, and the material being ~reated form a dynamic system~ in which certain system para-neters, if carefully observed, will xesult in the desired treatment.
Specifically we have established that for the fine treatments being sought, the treatmen~ point a~ which the web is slowed down and caused to compact longitudinally must be maintained continually inside the actual drive nip, in oppositon to forces presented by the moving drive surfaces bounding both sides of the treatment cavity. Secondly, the initial point of action of the stationary retarding device upon the extruding, compacted column must occur ¦relatively abruptly as a damming force, at a position close to the initial point of compaction. This force is produced by a dam means capable of presenting a frontal surface inclined to the di-rection of the immediately approaching web, while downstream thereo cthe web is engaged by a surface lying relatively more parallel to the web direction.
For most cases resilience should also be provided in the system, by which the compacting column, as it leaves the treat-Iment point, and passes the initial point of the retarding device,!engages the stationary surface of the retarding device in a re-silient, supported manner, thus allowing for compensatory give and take as the compressive forces ~end ~o rise and fall and ¦at the same time ensuring against the production of unwanted gross folds or sup rficial crepe. The nature Or the desired resilient 3 ~
~,``~ ` I
! i l engagemen~ i5 de~ennirled both by the properties oE tne particular !
¦~m~terial being treated as weIl as by -the machine elements. A
il stationary retarding member is usually preferred to provide the ,resilience, preferably a thin Elexible spring member; but in S jcertain special cases where the treated material presents a com-!pacted column which tends by itself to blossom to greater t~ick-ness, sufficient resiliency is then provided by the compacted material itself. In maintaining the position of the point of treatment, variations in the balance between the various riction and drag forces and the nature of the constriction offered by the retardiny device, affect the treatment. In certain preferred embodiments, two drive xolls are employed having the same surface friction characteristics, and driven at the same speed, and a pair of retarding members are advantageously employed, which in lS running condition, act in a balanced way upon ~he material.
In other preferred embodiments a single retarding member may be employed which has a leading part supported next to a first of the rolls and a rearwardly extending part conforming to the curvature of the opposite roll, the latter roll preferably having a reduced driving force relative to the first roll. This reduced driving force may be provided by driving the opposite roll at a slo~er speed, or by providing a surface which is not as rough as that of the first roll. The Ibalance of forces is also adjusted by providing sur~ace rough-ness on the active surface of the retarding member as byplasma coating with an-abrasive material.
In still other embodiments a machine is provided with single retarding member opera~ion, as for start-up, and means ¦to provide a transition to double retarding member operation, ¦during running conditions, as ~or achieving the uniform e~fects ¦on both sides mentioned above.
I .
The invention provldes a machine and method of longitudinal comr pressive treatment of a traveling web, comprising driving the web ~orward along a web path by a pair of oppositely ro~a~ing, stabl.e-surfaced rolls that form a drive nip, and retarding the web on the ex:lt side of the drive nip, characterized in that retarding is accomplished by a damming effect produced by a dam means capable oE presenting a frontal surface inclined to the direction of travel of the approaching web, said method further character-; ized by steadily maintaining said dam means in a position in the region of minor divergence of said roll surfaces, said position being at a distance downstream from the line of centers of said pair of rolls less than about 5 percent of the sum of the diameters of said rolls, said position establish-ing between the roll surfaces a longitudinal compression cavity of corre-spondingly short length and of consequent short height that confines a longitudinally compacted moving column of web, fresh web that is progressive-ly delivered by said drive nip being compressed against the end of said mov-ing column confined in said short cavity.
The initial p~rt of the dam means may comprise a resilient nipping surface, preferably a curved, resilient member presenting a convexly curved surface to the corresponding side of the advancing web, preferably the up- ;
stream end of this curved member converging toward the respective nip roll.
In preferred embodiments the dam surface lies at an angle of greater than 20 and less than 60 to the oncoming web, and an elongated confinement surface extends
Z~
ll Background of the Invention ~¦ This invention relates to fine, uniform longitudinal ¦¦ compressive treatment of webs and web-form materials for changing I thelr physical properties--trea-tmen-ts, for exa~ple, to provide Ishrink-resistance, stretchiness, increased density, softness, I texture, improved fiitering ~ction, and other properties to ¦ textile and textile-like, including non-woven, web materials.
Reference is made to prior art such as U. S. patents to Cluett 1,861,424; Wrigley et al~ 2,263,712; Barnard 2,958;608; Cohn et al. 3,015,145 and 3,015,146; Harmon 3,059,313 and the present inventor Walton 2,765,513; 2,765,514; 2,915,109; 3,260,778;
3,426,405; 3,B10,280; 2,869,7~8; and 3,975,806.
Prior machines have been successful for many webs and end uses, but have still presented serious deficiencies in other important applications, producing, for example, unwanted differences in the two sides of a web being treated, or shear across the thickness of the material, or crushing of the material in the direction of the web thickness.
In the case of shrink-proofing tubular knit dyed goods using available machines, physical differences in the two sides, hence dif~erences in the apparent color o~ the two sides, cause matching problems if apparel are made with the treated goods.
¦ In the case of compressively treating loosely bound bats of filter fibers using available machines, unwanted crushing in the direction of the web thickness can detrimentally affect physical properties and the filtering action of the final product.
Prior machines have also pxesented problems in ~nitial alignment of machine parts, in maintaining uniform settings ~'.
' ' ' . . . .
l, ~
1 throughout lon~ productlon runs, and in -the frequent need to ¦I replace parts subject to wear.
Il M~ny of the deficiencies oE prior machines noted above ¦! are traceable to the manner in which the drive forces are applied ¦I to the web to be treated. In commercially successful machines the drive often involves a single roll and a stationary s~oe which presses the web against the roll~ While this is successful in providing drive force, it does so only while also providing certain shear and crushing forces. As has long been realized, if a machine could be provided for present purposes employing a pair of drive rolls forming a driving nip for the web, these deficiencies could be avoided or eliminated. The problem o~
doing this, however, is not simple because the kind of treatment being sought is one of extreme fineness, to be applied very uniformly over the web, without producing destructive action, lint, or unwanted folds or crepes. At the same time the geometry provided by a pair of rolls is very limiting in respect to the space and manner of insertion of retarding members. With certain prior arrangements it has ~een found that retarding blades and the like cut the material, or the material goes beneath the edge of the blade and becomes snagged. In other cases the retarding members do not apply sufficient force to provide the fine, dense treatment desired, or spurting and uneven treatment, or detri-mental gross folds or unwanted superficial crepe occur.
Summary of the Invention General objects of the invention are to overcome these and related deficiencies of the prior art, while certain particular ob]ects are to provide a new compaction and shrink-., ~4~
1.
jproofing system for knitted goods, a new mechanical softeningjand compacting system for non-woven fabrics including those ~which are loosely formed, open or thick, and a new system for Igathering, splaying and otherwise condi-tioning the fiber assem-¦~lage in a web or bat.
¦ According to the invention, we have realized tha~~t~e driving rolls, the retarding de~ice, and the material being ~reated form a dynamic system~ in which certain system para-neters, if carefully observed, will xesult in the desired treatment.
Specifically we have established that for the fine treatments being sought, the treatmen~ point a~ which the web is slowed down and caused to compact longitudinally must be maintained continually inside the actual drive nip, in oppositon to forces presented by the moving drive surfaces bounding both sides of the treatment cavity. Secondly, the initial point of action of the stationary retarding device upon the extruding, compacted column must occur ¦relatively abruptly as a damming force, at a position close to the initial point of compaction. This force is produced by a dam means capable of presenting a frontal surface inclined to the di-rection of the immediately approaching web, while downstream thereo cthe web is engaged by a surface lying relatively more parallel to the web direction.
For most cases resilience should also be provided in the system, by which the compacting column, as it leaves the treat-Iment point, and passes the initial point of the retarding device,!engages the stationary surface of the retarding device in a re-silient, supported manner, thus allowing for compensatory give and take as the compressive forces ~end ~o rise and fall and ¦at the same time ensuring against the production of unwanted gross folds or sup rficial crepe. The nature Or the desired resilient 3 ~
~,``~ ` I
! i l engagemen~ i5 de~ennirled both by the properties oE tne particular !
¦~m~terial being treated as weIl as by -the machine elements. A
il stationary retarding member is usually preferred to provide the ,resilience, preferably a thin Elexible spring member; but in S jcertain special cases where the treated material presents a com-!pacted column which tends by itself to blossom to greater t~ick-ness, sufficient resiliency is then provided by the compacted material itself. In maintaining the position of the point of treatment, variations in the balance between the various riction and drag forces and the nature of the constriction offered by the retardiny device, affect the treatment. In certain preferred embodiments, two drive xolls are employed having the same surface friction characteristics, and driven at the same speed, and a pair of retarding members are advantageously employed, which in lS running condition, act in a balanced way upon ~he material.
In other preferred embodiments a single retarding member may be employed which has a leading part supported next to a first of the rolls and a rearwardly extending part conforming to the curvature of the opposite roll, the latter roll preferably having a reduced driving force relative to the first roll. This reduced driving force may be provided by driving the opposite roll at a slo~er speed, or by providing a surface which is not as rough as that of the first roll. The Ibalance of forces is also adjusted by providing sur~ace rough-ness on the active surface of the retarding member as byplasma coating with an-abrasive material.
In still other embodiments a machine is provided with single retarding member opera~ion, as for start-up, and means ¦to provide a transition to double retarding member operation, ¦during running conditions, as ~or achieving the uniform e~fects ¦on both sides mentioned above.
I .
The invention provldes a machine and method of longitudinal comr pressive treatment of a traveling web, comprising driving the web ~orward along a web path by a pair of oppositely ro~a~ing, stabl.e-surfaced rolls that form a drive nip, and retarding the web on the ex:lt side of the drive nip, characterized in that retarding is accomplished by a damming effect produced by a dam means capable oE presenting a frontal surface inclined to the direction of travel of the approaching web, said method further character-; ized by steadily maintaining said dam means in a position in the region of minor divergence of said roll surfaces, said position being at a distance downstream from the line of centers of said pair of rolls less than about 5 percent of the sum of the diameters of said rolls, said position establish-ing between the roll surfaces a longitudinal compression cavity of corre-spondingly short length and of consequent short height that confines a longitudinally compacted moving column of web, fresh web that is progressive-ly delivered by said drive nip being compressed against the end of said mov-ing column confined in said short cavity.
The initial p~rt of the dam means may comprise a resilient nipping surface, preferably a curved, resilient member presenting a convexly curved surface to the corresponding side of the advancing web, preferably the up- ;
stream end of this curved member converging toward the respective nip roll.
In preferred embodiments the dam surface lies at an angle of greater than 20 and less than 60 to the oncoming web, and an elongated confinement surface extends
2~ ' ,downstream of the dam on both s.ides of the web en~bling the l~eb to be confined in compacted state for a period of time. In ¦'various preferred emhodiments means are provided to permit re-silient compensatory motion of at least one of the retarding iimembers to increase the cross-section of the web flow path in ¦Iresponse to increase of compressional forces exerted by the ¦¦compacted column, for instance, the dam or the curved resilient member is resiliently deformable in the direction normal to the surface of the web. Preferably such a resiliently defo.rmable 10 member is of sheet metal spring form, e.g., of less than about .010 inch thickness, extending generally in the direction of the web :~
path, preferably having an upstream end bent relatively abruptly toward the nip roll, preferably the rolls and the spring member ¦extending continuously throughout the width of the web being treated. PreEerably a second member is interposed between the spring member and the respective roll, against which the spring member bears for support during the treatment, this second mem-ber preferably having an upstream portion adjacent to the roll, in advance of the upstream end of the spring member, against which the end of the spring member bears, and in the case of the ¦preferred free-ended spring member, upon which the free end can slide during deflection.
I Also in preferred embodiments at least one of the ¦retarding members is mounted for resilient compensatory movement ~in a direction outwaxdly from the drive nip line of centers in ¦response to increase in compressional force exerted thereupon by the compacted column, preferably the retarding member being mounted to swing about the roll to which it is adjacent to ¦produce the compensa~ory movement~ In various preferred embodi-¦¦ments the r tarding members are at least partially responsive .
I!
. I
¦to forces exerted thereupon to move in self-adjusting motion, lin certain preferrcd embodiments to move opposi-t~ly, and -the !ini-tial part of one of the reta~ding members in its starting Iposition is located upstream of the initial part of the other retarding member, and adapted to move to a more nearly equal position as steady state running conditions are reached. In other embodiments Qnly a single such retarding member is employed.
In either case advantageously the retarding member is formed from a sheet of spring metal which can conform to the curvature oE
the opposite roll.
Preferably the rolls are o rigid material preventing localized deformation of the roll surfaces in the region of the dams or spring members and a first of the retarding members is provided with the mentioned d~m or spring member and the second of the retarding members comprises a surface extending generally parallel to the web path or each of the retarding members is provided with a dam or spring member~
In cases where the web material has resilience in the I direction of its thickness, in certain embodiments the dam is formed as an integral nose portion o~ a wear-resistant rigid-surfaced retarding member~
~he featured method of treatment of the invention lies in providing and positioning the various surfaces and actions mentloned above in treating web materials.
The invention also features a mounting system for a pair of retarding members enabling starting and running condi- ;
¦tions to be achieved in a self-adjusting and self-balancing ~system, for better controlled operation.
~ :, ,.
~1 _ 7 ~
~3rief Des~t--on of the r~ra~ ncJs .iCJ. 1 iS ~n encl view o~ a m~-,hine assembll acco~cling l¦to a pr~f~rred embodiment o~ the :invention and Fig. la is a per~
¦'spective vi~w th~reo~; ¦
I Figs. 2 and 3 are views on a ~agnified scale o~ the elements of this embodiment that form the trea~ment cavity, shown !in greater magnified scale respectively in starting and xunning Ipositions, while Fig. 4 is a diagrammatic view illustrating action of the material in an intermediate position between the positions of Figs. 2 and 3;
Fig. 5 is a perspective view o~ a retarding member of the embodiment while Fig. 5a shows an alternate construction;
¦ Figs. 6, 7, and 8 are views corresponaing respectively Ito Figs. 2, ~, and 3, illustrating a machine with a single spring ¦retarding member;
Fig. ~ is a view similar to Fig. 2 of a machine employ-'ing a single retarding ~ember while Fig. 10 is a view on an en-llarged scale of a yariation thereof;
; ¦ ~ Figs. ~1-13 are views similar to Figs~ 6-8 o~ a machine ¦employing rigid retarding faces; and I Fig. 14 is an end view similar to Fig~ 1 of an embodi- _ iment employing linear adjustment of the retarding members.
I Description o~ the Preferred Embodiment , ¦ Referring to Fig. 1, a preferred embodiment suitable as la wide-range laboratory or production machine i~s shown. Roll 12, e.g., of 5 inch diameter, is mounted in bearing 40 supported by base 42 and roll 10 also of 5 inch diameter is mounted in bearing 44 resiliently biasea against roll 12 by compressaon ~springs 46 bearing against upper plate 48 held by rod~ 50 project-Il .
~j,.,. i 2~
i I
¦ling from base 42. An adjus~able stop 52 limits downward move-jment of roll 10 to establish the s-t~rting gap between the rolls.
The rolls are of rigid material and are driven in the direction lof the arrows by means not shown.
S ~ Retarding assembly arms 54 and 56 are pivoted about axes 10a and 12a at each end of ~he respective rolls,and upon each is mounted a retarding assembly 29, the details o~ which will be described later. Swinging the respective axm adjusts the retarding assembly about the periphery of the roll, main-taining a constant angular relation between the roll sur~aceand the matching assembly.
A douhle-acting air cylinder 60 is pivotally mounted upon upper arm 54 at 55 at each end o~ the machine and a rod extension 61 of the piston of each is pivotally connected at 57 to lower arm 56. Outward action of the piston forces arms 54 and 56 apart, causing rotation of the upper retarding assembly out ¦of the nip, to the rest position shown in Fig. l; inward action ¦draws the upper assembly ~oward the minimum spaced working position established by stop 64. Th~ stops for the two pistons are linked by a chain 65, Fig. la, to have equal movement during adjustment.
The linkage provided by rods 61 ensures that i~ one retarding assembly moves out of the nip the other tends to move toward the nip. Adjustable lift rod 62, made resilient by sprin~ 63, prevents gravity motion of the lower arm, thus making it possible to es-¦tablish a position in which the lower retarding assembly 29 is in-serted more deeply into the nip than the upper retarding assembly, with a predetermined amount of resilience.
~ For setup of the machine, without the web in place, ¦roll stop nuts 52 at each end of the Iroll assembly are adjusted to establish the starting gap between the rolls, e.g., to a spacing equal to a fraction 1, _ 9 _ _ ; I
1~8~ 8 ,, ~
of the thlckness of the particular web selected for treatment.
I There~lpon nut 62a of adjustable lif-t rod 6~ is adjusted to im-I pose a chosen degxee of resilient co~pressive force with which I lower retardin~ assembly 29 is lifted against gravity and urged 5 ¦, into the nip. The stops 64 are then adjusted to establish the de-sired minimum spacing between the two assemblies, normally this spacing being smaller, the thinner are the materials and the finer the treatment desired. ~he air pressure source for the ! air cylinder 60 can then be set, to establish the degree of 10 ! resilient force tending to hold the two assemblies to the ¦ minimum spacing set by the stop 64.
For operation, with air pressure applied to air cylinder 60, arms 54 and 56 are drawn together, carrying the ' upper retarding assembly into the nip, the lower retarding as-15 ¦ sembly retaining approximately its original position. Thereupon ¦ the drive rolls are energized and the web is driven toward i the retarding device, whose details will now be described.
I In the embodiment of Pigs. 1-4 each of the retarding I I assemblies 29,~ see Fig. 5, is proylded with an initial part 20 I forming a dam, realized in a two-part constxuction which incor-I porates a resilient compensatory action. Spring plate 30, e.g., ¦ a blued spring steel, is provided with a bent-down frontal curve, the end 31, converging toward its xoll, and is mounted upon a car-I rier knife blade 32 having a leading part 33 which extends slight~ Y
upstream of the end~31 bf plate 30. Both extend continuously forthe full operative width of the machine, as do the rolls with I which the~ are associated. The forward end 31 of the spring ¦I plate is free, but bears for suppor-t upon carrier blade 32.
¦I The opposite end, spaced downstream, is fixed in holder 34 (Fig.
301l 5) attached to carrier blade 32.
I' .
1. .
'' - 10 -~ J
~4~
1, i ~ s sho~n in this pr~ferr~d embodimentt the fron-tal por-- !
tion 31 of member 30 forms an acute~ngle~ Jith the direction of the!
oncoming web path within ~he range oE Cl greater than about 20 and iless than about 60. The web-contactable surface 35 of member 30 Idownstream of the ~rontal portion 31 forms an angle more closely !
parallel to direction D.
The operative se~uence o the machine is as follc~7~.
After actuation of the air cylinder 60 draws the arms 54, 56 to-Igether, the position of Fig: 2 is attained. Note that the lead fle~
lible retarding member 30 curves forward in conformity with the opposite roll 10 before terminating at the forward end 31 which curves toward the adjacent roll 12. As the web 14 is driven for-ward by the drive rolls, Fig. 2, it is opposed by the dam formed by the forward end 31 which has substantially filled the nip cavity This resistance to the flow of the material causes a compacted col-umn to extend upstream to poin-t X, (See Fig. 4), close -to the nip line of center ~ As this occurs the lower retarding assembly 29, under the influence of the leftward compressive force o the ~material, moves toward the left, finally reaching the position ¦shown in Fig. 3, compressing spring 63. Due to the linkage between the retarding member provided by pivoted rod 61, the upper assembly moves simultaneously upstream to the right from the position of Fig. 2 to that of Fig. 3. Depending upon the forces generated in the material, the resilient air pressure of the cylinder can be OVerCome to force both assemblies to the le~t of the position o Fig. 3 to further separate the assemblies. As the damming forces ~produced by spring member 30 oppose the passage of the material, compaction occurs in the nip, in the extremely short passage A be-¦I$ween the retar~ing device and the nip line of centers ~. The 30 ¦1 length of this passage is generally no more than about 5% of the sum of the diameters o~ the two rolls, and usually is less than ha~
that amount. An open space S (Fig. 4) between the curved end 31 o~!
spring member 30 and its associated carrier blade 32, enables 1~ 11 , . Il . .........
~D8~2~ i ~?c~C~ rL~ m~a~ 30 to r~ ntl~ c1~1~ct ~ce~ isa toward it3 blade 32 in ~he presence of the ~orc~s perpendicular to the pl~ne llof the web exerted by the compac-ted web. During this action the ¦rel~tively abrupt curvature o~ the initial par-t of the spring Imember prevents its complete Elatt~ning. In this manner a damming quality can be retained during operation, in some ca~es the angle ¦lof the frontal surface desirably at~entuated by resilient deflec~io ilof the upstream end of the spring member, as determined b~ t-~e Igeometry and material of the spring and the forces exerted.
In another preferred embodimen~, Fig. Sa, a resilient pad 39, e.g., of silicone rubber, extending the full width of the mach-ine, adhered to the underside of the leading par-k 31 of the spring member 30, maintains anyle of inclination a of the leading part Iduring passage of compacted material. As the spring member ~30 of leither embodiment tends ~o deflect from its unstressed to its stressed, more 1attened, position, its leading tip is free to slid upstream, while still bearing upon carrier blade 32, to facilitate ¦this deflection. Also,downstream portions of the carriex blade Iserve to maintain the corresponding downstream portions 35 o~ mem-Ibers 30 in resilient contact with~the compacted web, so that time-dependent processes can occur to set the treated web before it is released by further downstream movement. Opposition to any tend-ency of the column to spurt over the dam and shift the point X
of initial compaction is assisted by -this resilient engagement.
In a preferred embodiment the spring members are formed of .003 to .010 inch thickness blue steel sheet, bent generally with a radius of curvature of between four and five inches, and having a relatively abr~pt bend toward the respective roll at a Ipoint 1/4 to 1/8 inch rom the upstream end of the spring member.
I The mounting of the~e spring members as described permits them to work relatively to the passing compacted material and re-latively to one another, even to vibrate, to aid in the smooth, .~ 2~
.~ I
¦low-friction passage o~ the compressed material between them.
By comparison of Figs. 2 and 3 it will be seen that the geometry o~ the treatment cavity is self-adjustable in yet another way between start-up and running conditions. The upper roll is Iresiliently deflected upwardly by the compressed material, thus ¦self-adjustably lightening any crushing tendency commensurate with the continued compaction of the web, a motion revealing that ~luid pressure-like compression Sorces are generated.
On the other hand it is of vital importance that the roll surfaces be stable, in many instances that they be entirely rigid, for by this feature the contour of the treatment cavity is stably maintained, and a~oids any tendency for the compacted material to indent into the roll to move with it in spurts.
The embodiment ju~t described is suitable for use with very thin materials, and with materials which are not resilient when compacted. It is particularly well suited in instances where identity of treatment of both sides of the web is an ex-treme requirement. In instances where such uniformity is not so vital, one of the retarding members may be positioned further ahead of the other, an arrangement which is also sometimes useful when very thin webs axe to be treated.
Referring now to Figs. 6-8 there is shown a double bladed retarding device. Only one of the blades carries a single spring member 30, which, as does the lead spring member in Fig. 2, dams the cavity at start-up, even to some extent resiliently conforming to the opposite roll as shown in Fig. 6. This lead retarding assembly moves from the start-up position of Fig. 6 ¦through the intermediate posi~ion of Fig. 7 to the operating ¦positon of Fig. 8. This embodiment may be employ~d where identity of treatment of both sides of the material is of re-Iduced concern, and in instances in which the web material itself demonstrates a c~rt~in d~gr~e o~ xesiliency in the ~om~ctecl Iskate. Indeed it is found to CJiVe an acceptab1e unifol-mity of ¦treatment to bo~h sides oE the web in many instances, with the !virtue of requiring fewer parts than the embodiment of Figs.
~ 4.
¦ Referring to Fig 9, a t~o-roll machine is shown em-ploying a single retarding member 70. This retarding member is fo~ned of spring steel sheet, for instance of thickness t = oO10 inch in its rea~ard portions. The forwardmost po~tion of length L of e.g., 1/2 inch, is of reduced thickness, i.e., tl = 005 inch. The rolls 10, 12 and the retarding member 70 extend con-tinuously throughout the width of the material to be treated. The retarding member 70 is formed with a gradual longitudinal curva-ture upwardly convex in unstressed condition, t~roughout its thin ¦portion, with a decreased radius curvature at its forward tip 71.
The member 70 is held in position in Fig. 9 with the curved tip 71 bearing directly against roll surface 12 and with the portion to the rear thereof conforming to~the curvature of the opposite -roll 10. As in the previous embodiments, the effect of the re-tarding member is to produce a compacted column of material ex-tending to the right of the tip o~ the retarding member to point X, thus de~ining the treatment cavity within the nip, bound by t~e two moving rolls. In the embodlment shown, roll 12 is driven ¦at a velocity Vl while roll 10, iengageS the compacted mater-lial over length L after compaction, is driven at ~he slower speed V2. In this case both rolls 10 and 12 may be provided with a ¦smooth surface finish such as chrome plate over steel. In the ¦embodiment of Fig. 10, similar to Fig. 9, the rolls 10 and 12 aredriven at the same velocity V2 and the retarding member 70' has 'a band, extending over distance ~1~ of roughened surface, i e., a plasma coating of me-talcarbide is applied to spring sheet mem- ¦
ber over this distance. In this embodimen~ rolls 10 and 12 may ~ 14 -L2~ .
sirllilarl~ b~ providecl wi~h the plasma coatincJ to obt~in a strong grip on -th~ material. In another embodiment, roll 12 is provided with such a coating, but roll 10 is provided with a smoother sur-face. In both figures 9 and 10 the retarding members are pictured I
'~in a running condition. The dotted line position in Fig. 10 re- ¦
presents the starting position in which the retarding member sub-,stantially ~ills the nip before the material is driven into con-t~ct with it.
I In the embodiments so far described the xetarding device has been the source of resilient engagement with the compacted material~ Referring to Fig. 11, 12, and 13, in other instances certain web materials, e.g., certain needled felts~ offer suf-ficient rasiliency that the material itself is the source of re-~ silient compensatory action, in the presence of varying compressionc 1 Iforces.
Referring to Fig. 11, the paired drive rolls 10, 12 rotat-ing per arrows M, Ml, drive web 14 between opposed stationary rigid surfaced retarding membexs 16, 19. These members are similar in '~general construction to blades 32 and may be mounted in similar ¦fashion in the machine of Fig. 1, or the machine of Fig. 14, to be ;described later on. The retarding members 16, 19 have initial ~arts 17, 20 inclined to the direction of oncoming web~ forming da~ ~, positioned in the region of minor divergence of the rolls beyond the nip center line for fro~tally opposing the progress of the web.
¦ The initial parts of the retarding members 16, 19 of Figs. 11-13 are sloped and then rounded, progressing downstream, ~nerging into flat surEaces 18, 21 which diverge gradua7ly relative Ito the axis of the web path. With this form it will be seen that Ithe passage for the material reduces in a short convergen~t passage ¦
from dimension Dl, between the moving drive rolls preceding the re-¦
¦tarding device, to lesser dimension D2 between the retarding mem- ¦
2~3 bers 16, 19, for abruptly applying retarding forces, and then expands to ease the flow of the trea-ted materi~l, as described above. While under certain circumstances the retarding members may be rigidly held, it is preferred that at least the leading re-tarding member 19 be mounted free to respond to forces exerted by Ithe compacted material to move resiliently to the left from the jinitial position in Fig. 11, with the leading part 20 continually, during this movement~ hugging ~he roll surface, opposed by a suit-able spring restraining force denoted by double arrow R. For stark- .
ing the treatment, the blunt part 20 of retaxder 19 is positioned lat distance A very close to the nip line of centers, Fig. 11, and the action commences by frontal opposition to the web by the lead-ing retarder 19 and movement to the position of Fig. 12. By the 'time the compacted material passes over the leading parts of both of the xetarding members, the longitudinal forces increase suffic-liently to force retarder 19 to the position of Fi~. 13, with thesize of the entrance between the members thus self-adjusted in a compensatory manner, and with the rolls spread apart in response to the compressive forces of the process.
I It is found desirable that the compensatory motion of re-¦itarding member 19 have a degree of independence rom the other re-¦Itarding member, e.g., in certain cases it is advantageous -that both llmembers be resiliently moun-ted, e.g., by springs as shown in Fig.
114 or by pneumatic cylinders. Thus, retarding member 16 can be ax-¦Iranged to adjust by movement dependent upon the spring rate of its ¦Iresilient mount.
Il In the embodiments of all of the figures, the drive rolls ¦lare advantageously provided with wear-re.sistant ~surfaces, for ex-ample, an external chrome layer or a plasma coating of a metal ilcarbide over a steel base. Their surfaces may either be smooth ~or of a selected roughness, depending upon the driving forces em-I' 1' - 16 -ll 4~
d -Incl tn~ n~lt~ oE ~hc~ t~al:ment cl2~iir~?d. Th~ r~.a~linc~
~embers are also of suitable hard, wear-resista~-t material having polished surfaces in mo~t cases. I
1 In all of the preferred embocliments it will be ~Inder- I ~
stood that the retarding members in effect present a leading entry ~orifice which imposes the main restriction in a relatively resil-¦lient manner to the oncoming material, and in a way which prevents cutting or shearing by blades as the compressional forces~b~ild up, Iland this orifice shifts in position in a self-adjusting manner as 10 ¦¦the treatment establishes itself, all in the ways shown in ~he examples, to achieve extremely fine and controllable treatments.
While the swinging adjustment of the arms of the em-bodiment of Fig~ 1 has advantage in maintaining the relationship of the retarding member tips to the rolls throughout the range of 15 ¦movement, other arrangements are possible. For instance, in the ~embodiment of Fig. 14 the lower retarding assembly 29 is mounted ¦stationary (or on a linear slide 90, downstream movement being resiliently resisted by adjustably-positioned compression spring ~92) while the leading part of the retarding assembly is resiliently biased to follow the contour of the roll surface. The upper re- ;
tarding assembly 29 (optionally, similarly mounted on slide 90a and resisted by compression spring 92a) is mounted on elongated pivot arm 94, biased into the nip by compression spring 96. (For l purposes of illustration, the embodiment shows the upper roll held 25 ljupwardly in a nonoperative position, and exaggerates the thickness !1 !jf the members forming the retardin~ members.) The retarding ¦members themselves may comprise any o~ the embodiments previously . .
Idescribed.
jl Since the drive rolls are relatively smooth, the blades 30 ,will wear relatively slowly. In cases where wear does oc~cur, Iblades can be simply replaced, or adjustment of the blades re-,¦lative to their supports can be made to compensate for the wear.
.'1 ~
i .. ..... . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . . ... . . . . .. .
24~ ~
. ~ .
The blades may be insulated from their holders in order to assume , the temper~t~lre of the machine, or of course separate heaters m~y be emplQyed in cases where diffeIential temperatures occur to remedy any distortion problems. The blade assemblies can provide stea~, hot air or kreatment gas distribution chambers, I and the resilient blades can be perforated to admit such gases I to the fabric both in the compression cavity in advance of the retarding assembly and in the retention passage following the ~ retarding orifice.
10 ¦I To further explain operation according to the invention, ¦ during start-up, opposition by the dams or springs of the various ¦ retarding members causes the material to be retarded, see Figs. 4, 7, 9, 10, and ll. Oncoming material is then longitudinally com-I pacted in the confines of the diverging passage defined by the 15 ~ moving rolls, downstream of the nip center line ~- , and upstream I
of the retarding device. The retarding forces are thus transmitted upstream through a compacting column o~ web t~ a line x, at which the grip of the drive rolls on the material is first overcome.
Further oncoming untreated material reaching line x sLips relative to the drive rolls and is longitudinally compacted against the al-ready compacted column, while the column is continuously forced to exit through the restricted region formed by the leading parts o~
the retarding members. The line x can shi~t to the right, toward ¦ the line of centers, if the compacted material forces the rolls 25 1 apart from their original position. In any event, the retarding , members are maintained in position such that the line x of initial I compaction continually remains upstream from them, where the material is confined by the gradual diverging, moving roll I surfaces as it is longitudinally~compacted. The entire a~tion 30 1 upon the material thus occurs in essentially a straight line ~ - 18 -' ... . . ... . . . .. . . . .. . . .
8~24~3 .
.
across the widkh oE the web with both sides of the materi~l Il exposed to respectively similar conditions during driving and ¦I retarding stages, and with only ligh-t crushing forces on the lll wèb perpendicular to -the web pl~ne.
5 I~i In m~chines according to the invention, as previously mentioned, the distance over which the treatmen-t actually occurs is very short. In preferred embodiments employing drive roils both of 5 inch diameter, for instance, dlmension A, from the nip line of centers to the initial part of the retarding device may be from 1/10 to 1/2 inch for a range of felt, non woven, woven and knitted materials.
The surfaces of the retarding members downstream from their leading parts serve a retention function, being arranged to confine the material under a condition of partial release from face-wise constraint, but still under compression. Their retarding effect is minor while still time-dependent setting processes can occur. Depending upon the particular process involved,these passayes may be subjected to heating or cooling conditions, or to steaming or to treatment with other fluids, as suggested above. The continuation of the retarding members outwardly therebeyond also serve as supports for properly positioning the active leading parts.
For reliable operation in most treatments, the resilient compensatory actions that have been described help to assure uniform flow and treatment, and to ensure positioning of the point o~ compaction continually in the nip, preceding the retarding device. But, as previously suggested, for instance with cer-tain needled felts of e.g., 1/4 to 3/8 inch uncompressed thick-¦ness, the material itself, when longitudinally compac'ed~in the machine, still provides the needed resilience to resiliently _ .. _. .__ ._ . . .. .~ . . _ .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . . . .. .
compact or e~pand in the direction oE its thic~.ness as pressures r~sp~ctively tend to rise or ~all. In such cases an entirely rigid system may be employed.
The following are examples oE cavity con~igurations operable according to the invention.
Example I: A web has an uncompressed thickness of .032 inches and a nipped dimension of .012 inch at the center-line of the spring-biased S inch diameter rolls, under normal driving Iconditions. The two retarding members, constructed according to Figs. 11-13, comprise steel plates of .050 inch thickness, with ¦,ends hollow ground`to match the curvature of the rolls, but I~ieach with a leading end portion formed in accordance with Figs. 11-1'13, dimension G of .008 inch and angle a = 55. In the running ¦condition the ends of the retarding members are 0.16 and 0.25 inch lS "from the line of centers, ~ , respectively. The dimension Dl between the roll surfaces immediately preceding the retarding Idevice is larger than dimenison D2I the minimum dimension between ¦the retarding members.
¦ Example II: Similar to Example I, but with the con-struc~ion of Figs. 6-8, employing a convexly curved spring member 30 of .005 inch thickness blue steel, rounded with approximately 4 inch radius of curvature, and having its free tip approximately ~1/16 inch to the rear o~ the tip o~ the blade 32 upon which it is Imounted, as shown in Fig. 5. The curved spring member deflects to the position of Figs. 7 and 8 during operation.
¦ Example III: A configuration according to Figs. 2-4 in which the blade members 32 are each of at least .020 inch thickness , , mild steel, ~ith tips hollow ground to points as shown, ¦ matching the roll curva-ture. Spring members 30, of 1 .003 inch thickness, blue steelr each have a distinct down-1' ' ',.
.
.. , _ . _ _ . .. . . .. ..... ... . .... . . . ... . ... . . . .... .. .
.. . .
i wardly curved end, with sharp curv~kure beginning at a point about !
! 3/16 inch from their Eree tips. wlth this arrangemen-t at start-up the parts ma~ be forced into the nip in accordance with the I position of Fig. 2, virtually filling the nip with metal and 5 ! ensuring that flow of even the thinnest web will be opposed to commence and maintain the compactive action as described.
For treating such materials as tubular knitted webs, the parameters determining the resilient compensatory action are selected to maintain the roll surfaces and the retarding members in intimate supporting contact with the faces of the ~abric, supporting the fabric against creping throuyhout its transit through the machine. For treating double layer materials, the machine surfaces can be adjusted to engage the material identically on both sides to ensure equality o treatment.
15 I In cases such as these the relationship of the parts ensures .
¦ that the material, even at start-up, never escapes past the ~l leading portion of the retarding assembly without being compacted.
¦I The material is confined by the gently diverging hard surfaces I of t~e rolls while the retarding members perform their damming ¦ opposition function to create and maintain the co~pacted column.
¦ The column, because of its shortness and denseness, and the pre-¦I ferred angular relationship of the dams, has the ability to ¦bridge the transition between moving and sta~ionary surfaces ! at both faces of the web without detrimental snagging, and the ~ material proceeds throughout the machine while intimately engaged .
I and supported on both sides. By this means a micro-treatment, ¦ without production of gross folds or detrimental crepe, is I obtainable.
! For treating loosely formed bats of webs, such~as jl, filter media, the drive rolls can engage the web only with I .
~, - 21- ~
11' . I ., . _ . _ . . ... . . .. . .. ... .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . .
t sufficient force to -thrust the material Eorward without undue Icrushing of the web in the direction of its thickness. In such 1. 1 a case the machine surfaces may be relaxed to a position to pro-duce a desired crepe of the material to re-orient the fibers as ,desired, while still the initial compaction proceeds in advance of the retarding device, in the manner described.
One aspect of the invention concerns the realization ¦that, for very fine treatments, especially with materials Idifficult to treat~ the s~art-up position and ~unning positions ~cannot be the same. The invention provides a self-adjusting Imechanism that achieves the proper geometry through the various ¦Istages .
¦I Suitable variations of the parameters of the machines l'will be readily determined for a wide variety of webs and end luses in light of the foregoing disclosure.
Wl ~t i~ claimed i-:
, .1 ' ' - 22 -I, .
,,, ,, ,, , I. ,,,,, ,, , .,, " ",, , ....... .. , :
path, preferably having an upstream end bent relatively abruptly toward the nip roll, preferably the rolls and the spring member ¦extending continuously throughout the width of the web being treated. PreEerably a second member is interposed between the spring member and the respective roll, against which the spring member bears for support during the treatment, this second mem-ber preferably having an upstream portion adjacent to the roll, in advance of the upstream end of the spring member, against which the end of the spring member bears, and in the case of the ¦preferred free-ended spring member, upon which the free end can slide during deflection.
I Also in preferred embodiments at least one of the ¦retarding members is mounted for resilient compensatory movement ~in a direction outwaxdly from the drive nip line of centers in ¦response to increase in compressional force exerted thereupon by the compacted column, preferably the retarding member being mounted to swing about the roll to which it is adjacent to ¦produce the compensa~ory movement~ In various preferred embodi-¦¦ments the r tarding members are at least partially responsive .
I!
. I
¦to forces exerted thereupon to move in self-adjusting motion, lin certain preferrcd embodiments to move opposi-t~ly, and -the !ini-tial part of one of the reta~ding members in its starting Iposition is located upstream of the initial part of the other retarding member, and adapted to move to a more nearly equal position as steady state running conditions are reached. In other embodiments Qnly a single such retarding member is employed.
In either case advantageously the retarding member is formed from a sheet of spring metal which can conform to the curvature oE
the opposite roll.
Preferably the rolls are o rigid material preventing localized deformation of the roll surfaces in the region of the dams or spring members and a first of the retarding members is provided with the mentioned d~m or spring member and the second of the retarding members comprises a surface extending generally parallel to the web path or each of the retarding members is provided with a dam or spring member~
In cases where the web material has resilience in the I direction of its thickness, in certain embodiments the dam is formed as an integral nose portion o~ a wear-resistant rigid-surfaced retarding member~
~he featured method of treatment of the invention lies in providing and positioning the various surfaces and actions mentloned above in treating web materials.
The invention also features a mounting system for a pair of retarding members enabling starting and running condi- ;
¦tions to be achieved in a self-adjusting and self-balancing ~system, for better controlled operation.
~ :, ,.
~1 _ 7 ~
~3rief Des~t--on of the r~ra~ ncJs .iCJ. 1 iS ~n encl view o~ a m~-,hine assembll acco~cling l¦to a pr~f~rred embodiment o~ the :invention and Fig. la is a per~
¦'spective vi~w th~reo~; ¦
I Figs. 2 and 3 are views on a ~agnified scale o~ the elements of this embodiment that form the trea~ment cavity, shown !in greater magnified scale respectively in starting and xunning Ipositions, while Fig. 4 is a diagrammatic view illustrating action of the material in an intermediate position between the positions of Figs. 2 and 3;
Fig. 5 is a perspective view o~ a retarding member of the embodiment while Fig. 5a shows an alternate construction;
¦ Figs. 6, 7, and 8 are views corresponaing respectively Ito Figs. 2, ~, and 3, illustrating a machine with a single spring ¦retarding member;
Fig. ~ is a view similar to Fig. 2 of a machine employ-'ing a single retarding ~ember while Fig. 10 is a view on an en-llarged scale of a yariation thereof;
; ¦ ~ Figs. ~1-13 are views similar to Figs~ 6-8 o~ a machine ¦employing rigid retarding faces; and I Fig. 14 is an end view similar to Fig~ 1 of an embodi- _ iment employing linear adjustment of the retarding members.
I Description o~ the Preferred Embodiment , ¦ Referring to Fig. 1, a preferred embodiment suitable as la wide-range laboratory or production machine i~s shown. Roll 12, e.g., of 5 inch diameter, is mounted in bearing 40 supported by base 42 and roll 10 also of 5 inch diameter is mounted in bearing 44 resiliently biasea against roll 12 by compressaon ~springs 46 bearing against upper plate 48 held by rod~ 50 project-Il .
~j,.,. i 2~
i I
¦ling from base 42. An adjus~able stop 52 limits downward move-jment of roll 10 to establish the s-t~rting gap between the rolls.
The rolls are of rigid material and are driven in the direction lof the arrows by means not shown.
S ~ Retarding assembly arms 54 and 56 are pivoted about axes 10a and 12a at each end of ~he respective rolls,and upon each is mounted a retarding assembly 29, the details o~ which will be described later. Swinging the respective axm adjusts the retarding assembly about the periphery of the roll, main-taining a constant angular relation between the roll sur~aceand the matching assembly.
A douhle-acting air cylinder 60 is pivotally mounted upon upper arm 54 at 55 at each end o~ the machine and a rod extension 61 of the piston of each is pivotally connected at 57 to lower arm 56. Outward action of the piston forces arms 54 and 56 apart, causing rotation of the upper retarding assembly out ¦of the nip, to the rest position shown in Fig. l; inward action ¦draws the upper assembly ~oward the minimum spaced working position established by stop 64. Th~ stops for the two pistons are linked by a chain 65, Fig. la, to have equal movement during adjustment.
The linkage provided by rods 61 ensures that i~ one retarding assembly moves out of the nip the other tends to move toward the nip. Adjustable lift rod 62, made resilient by sprin~ 63, prevents gravity motion of the lower arm, thus making it possible to es-¦tablish a position in which the lower retarding assembly 29 is in-serted more deeply into the nip than the upper retarding assembly, with a predetermined amount of resilience.
~ For setup of the machine, without the web in place, ¦roll stop nuts 52 at each end of the Iroll assembly are adjusted to establish the starting gap between the rolls, e.g., to a spacing equal to a fraction 1, _ 9 _ _ ; I
1~8~ 8 ,, ~
of the thlckness of the particular web selected for treatment.
I There~lpon nut 62a of adjustable lif-t rod 6~ is adjusted to im-I pose a chosen degxee of resilient co~pressive force with which I lower retardin~ assembly 29 is lifted against gravity and urged 5 ¦, into the nip. The stops 64 are then adjusted to establish the de-sired minimum spacing between the two assemblies, normally this spacing being smaller, the thinner are the materials and the finer the treatment desired. ~he air pressure source for the ! air cylinder 60 can then be set, to establish the degree of 10 ! resilient force tending to hold the two assemblies to the ¦ minimum spacing set by the stop 64.
For operation, with air pressure applied to air cylinder 60, arms 54 and 56 are drawn together, carrying the ' upper retarding assembly into the nip, the lower retarding as-15 ¦ sembly retaining approximately its original position. Thereupon ¦ the drive rolls are energized and the web is driven toward i the retarding device, whose details will now be described.
I In the embodiment of Pigs. 1-4 each of the retarding I I assemblies 29,~ see Fig. 5, is proylded with an initial part 20 I forming a dam, realized in a two-part constxuction which incor-I porates a resilient compensatory action. Spring plate 30, e.g., ¦ a blued spring steel, is provided with a bent-down frontal curve, the end 31, converging toward its xoll, and is mounted upon a car-I rier knife blade 32 having a leading part 33 which extends slight~ Y
upstream of the end~31 bf plate 30. Both extend continuously forthe full operative width of the machine, as do the rolls with I which the~ are associated. The forward end 31 of the spring ¦I plate is free, but bears for suppor-t upon carrier blade 32.
¦I The opposite end, spaced downstream, is fixed in holder 34 (Fig.
301l 5) attached to carrier blade 32.
I' .
1. .
'' - 10 -~ J
~4~
1, i ~ s sho~n in this pr~ferr~d embodimentt the fron-tal por-- !
tion 31 of member 30 forms an acute~ngle~ Jith the direction of the!
oncoming web path within ~he range oE Cl greater than about 20 and iless than about 60. The web-contactable surface 35 of member 30 Idownstream of the ~rontal portion 31 forms an angle more closely !
parallel to direction D.
The operative se~uence o the machine is as follc~7~.
After actuation of the air cylinder 60 draws the arms 54, 56 to-Igether, the position of Fig: 2 is attained. Note that the lead fle~
lible retarding member 30 curves forward in conformity with the opposite roll 10 before terminating at the forward end 31 which curves toward the adjacent roll 12. As the web 14 is driven for-ward by the drive rolls, Fig. 2, it is opposed by the dam formed by the forward end 31 which has substantially filled the nip cavity This resistance to the flow of the material causes a compacted col-umn to extend upstream to poin-t X, (See Fig. 4), close -to the nip line of center ~ As this occurs the lower retarding assembly 29, under the influence of the leftward compressive force o the ~material, moves toward the left, finally reaching the position ¦shown in Fig. 3, compressing spring 63. Due to the linkage between the retarding member provided by pivoted rod 61, the upper assembly moves simultaneously upstream to the right from the position of Fig. 2 to that of Fig. 3. Depending upon the forces generated in the material, the resilient air pressure of the cylinder can be OVerCome to force both assemblies to the le~t of the position o Fig. 3 to further separate the assemblies. As the damming forces ~produced by spring member 30 oppose the passage of the material, compaction occurs in the nip, in the extremely short passage A be-¦I$ween the retar~ing device and the nip line of centers ~. The 30 ¦1 length of this passage is generally no more than about 5% of the sum of the diameters o~ the two rolls, and usually is less than ha~
that amount. An open space S (Fig. 4) between the curved end 31 o~!
spring member 30 and its associated carrier blade 32, enables 1~ 11 , . Il . .........
~D8~2~ i ~?c~C~ rL~ m~a~ 30 to r~ ntl~ c1~1~ct ~ce~ isa toward it3 blade 32 in ~he presence of the ~orc~s perpendicular to the pl~ne llof the web exerted by the compac-ted web. During this action the ¦rel~tively abrupt curvature o~ the initial par-t of the spring Imember prevents its complete Elatt~ning. In this manner a damming quality can be retained during operation, in some ca~es the angle ¦lof the frontal surface desirably at~entuated by resilient deflec~io ilof the upstream end of the spring member, as determined b~ t-~e Igeometry and material of the spring and the forces exerted.
In another preferred embodimen~, Fig. Sa, a resilient pad 39, e.g., of silicone rubber, extending the full width of the mach-ine, adhered to the underside of the leading par-k 31 of the spring member 30, maintains anyle of inclination a of the leading part Iduring passage of compacted material. As the spring member ~30 of leither embodiment tends ~o deflect from its unstressed to its stressed, more 1attened, position, its leading tip is free to slid upstream, while still bearing upon carrier blade 32, to facilitate ¦this deflection. Also,downstream portions of the carriex blade Iserve to maintain the corresponding downstream portions 35 o~ mem-Ibers 30 in resilient contact with~the compacted web, so that time-dependent processes can occur to set the treated web before it is released by further downstream movement. Opposition to any tend-ency of the column to spurt over the dam and shift the point X
of initial compaction is assisted by -this resilient engagement.
In a preferred embodiment the spring members are formed of .003 to .010 inch thickness blue steel sheet, bent generally with a radius of curvature of between four and five inches, and having a relatively abr~pt bend toward the respective roll at a Ipoint 1/4 to 1/8 inch rom the upstream end of the spring member.
I The mounting of the~e spring members as described permits them to work relatively to the passing compacted material and re-latively to one another, even to vibrate, to aid in the smooth, .~ 2~
.~ I
¦low-friction passage o~ the compressed material between them.
By comparison of Figs. 2 and 3 it will be seen that the geometry o~ the treatment cavity is self-adjustable in yet another way between start-up and running conditions. The upper roll is Iresiliently deflected upwardly by the compressed material, thus ¦self-adjustably lightening any crushing tendency commensurate with the continued compaction of the web, a motion revealing that ~luid pressure-like compression Sorces are generated.
On the other hand it is of vital importance that the roll surfaces be stable, in many instances that they be entirely rigid, for by this feature the contour of the treatment cavity is stably maintained, and a~oids any tendency for the compacted material to indent into the roll to move with it in spurts.
The embodiment ju~t described is suitable for use with very thin materials, and with materials which are not resilient when compacted. It is particularly well suited in instances where identity of treatment of both sides of the web is an ex-treme requirement. In instances where such uniformity is not so vital, one of the retarding members may be positioned further ahead of the other, an arrangement which is also sometimes useful when very thin webs axe to be treated.
Referring now to Figs. 6-8 there is shown a double bladed retarding device. Only one of the blades carries a single spring member 30, which, as does the lead spring member in Fig. 2, dams the cavity at start-up, even to some extent resiliently conforming to the opposite roll as shown in Fig. 6. This lead retarding assembly moves from the start-up position of Fig. 6 ¦through the intermediate posi~ion of Fig. 7 to the operating ¦positon of Fig. 8. This embodiment may be employ~d where identity of treatment of both sides of the material is of re-Iduced concern, and in instances in which the web material itself demonstrates a c~rt~in d~gr~e o~ xesiliency in the ~om~ctecl Iskate. Indeed it is found to CJiVe an acceptab1e unifol-mity of ¦treatment to bo~h sides oE the web in many instances, with the !virtue of requiring fewer parts than the embodiment of Figs.
~ 4.
¦ Referring to Fig 9, a t~o-roll machine is shown em-ploying a single retarding member 70. This retarding member is fo~ned of spring steel sheet, for instance of thickness t = oO10 inch in its rea~ard portions. The forwardmost po~tion of length L of e.g., 1/2 inch, is of reduced thickness, i.e., tl = 005 inch. The rolls 10, 12 and the retarding member 70 extend con-tinuously throughout the width of the material to be treated. The retarding member 70 is formed with a gradual longitudinal curva-ture upwardly convex in unstressed condition, t~roughout its thin ¦portion, with a decreased radius curvature at its forward tip 71.
The member 70 is held in position in Fig. 9 with the curved tip 71 bearing directly against roll surface 12 and with the portion to the rear thereof conforming to~the curvature of the opposite -roll 10. As in the previous embodiments, the effect of the re-tarding member is to produce a compacted column of material ex-tending to the right of the tip o~ the retarding member to point X, thus de~ining the treatment cavity within the nip, bound by t~e two moving rolls. In the embodlment shown, roll 12 is driven ¦at a velocity Vl while roll 10, iengageS the compacted mater-lial over length L after compaction, is driven at ~he slower speed V2. In this case both rolls 10 and 12 may be provided with a ¦smooth surface finish such as chrome plate over steel. In the ¦embodiment of Fig. 10, similar to Fig. 9, the rolls 10 and 12 aredriven at the same velocity V2 and the retarding member 70' has 'a band, extending over distance ~1~ of roughened surface, i e., a plasma coating of me-talcarbide is applied to spring sheet mem- ¦
ber over this distance. In this embodimen~ rolls 10 and 12 may ~ 14 -L2~ .
sirllilarl~ b~ providecl wi~h the plasma coatincJ to obt~in a strong grip on -th~ material. In another embodiment, roll 12 is provided with such a coating, but roll 10 is provided with a smoother sur-face. In both figures 9 and 10 the retarding members are pictured I
'~in a running condition. The dotted line position in Fig. 10 re- ¦
presents the starting position in which the retarding member sub-,stantially ~ills the nip before the material is driven into con-t~ct with it.
I In the embodiments so far described the xetarding device has been the source of resilient engagement with the compacted material~ Referring to Fig. 11, 12, and 13, in other instances certain web materials, e.g., certain needled felts~ offer suf-ficient rasiliency that the material itself is the source of re-~ silient compensatory action, in the presence of varying compressionc 1 Iforces.
Referring to Fig. 11, the paired drive rolls 10, 12 rotat-ing per arrows M, Ml, drive web 14 between opposed stationary rigid surfaced retarding membexs 16, 19. These members are similar in '~general construction to blades 32 and may be mounted in similar ¦fashion in the machine of Fig. 1, or the machine of Fig. 14, to be ;described later on. The retarding members 16, 19 have initial ~arts 17, 20 inclined to the direction of oncoming web~ forming da~ ~, positioned in the region of minor divergence of the rolls beyond the nip center line for fro~tally opposing the progress of the web.
¦ The initial parts of the retarding members 16, 19 of Figs. 11-13 are sloped and then rounded, progressing downstream, ~nerging into flat surEaces 18, 21 which diverge gradua7ly relative Ito the axis of the web path. With this form it will be seen that Ithe passage for the material reduces in a short convergen~t passage ¦
from dimension Dl, between the moving drive rolls preceding the re-¦
¦tarding device, to lesser dimension D2 between the retarding mem- ¦
2~3 bers 16, 19, for abruptly applying retarding forces, and then expands to ease the flow of the trea-ted materi~l, as described above. While under certain circumstances the retarding members may be rigidly held, it is preferred that at least the leading re-tarding member 19 be mounted free to respond to forces exerted by Ithe compacted material to move resiliently to the left from the jinitial position in Fig. 11, with the leading part 20 continually, during this movement~ hugging ~he roll surface, opposed by a suit-able spring restraining force denoted by double arrow R. For stark- .
ing the treatment, the blunt part 20 of retaxder 19 is positioned lat distance A very close to the nip line of centers, Fig. 11, and the action commences by frontal opposition to the web by the lead-ing retarder 19 and movement to the position of Fig. 12. By the 'time the compacted material passes over the leading parts of both of the xetarding members, the longitudinal forces increase suffic-liently to force retarder 19 to the position of Fi~. 13, with thesize of the entrance between the members thus self-adjusted in a compensatory manner, and with the rolls spread apart in response to the compressive forces of the process.
I It is found desirable that the compensatory motion of re-¦itarding member 19 have a degree of independence rom the other re-¦Itarding member, e.g., in certain cases it is advantageous -that both llmembers be resiliently moun-ted, e.g., by springs as shown in Fig.
114 or by pneumatic cylinders. Thus, retarding member 16 can be ax-¦Iranged to adjust by movement dependent upon the spring rate of its ¦Iresilient mount.
Il In the embodiments of all of the figures, the drive rolls ¦lare advantageously provided with wear-re.sistant ~surfaces, for ex-ample, an external chrome layer or a plasma coating of a metal ilcarbide over a steel base. Their surfaces may either be smooth ~or of a selected roughness, depending upon the driving forces em-I' 1' - 16 -ll 4~
d -Incl tn~ n~lt~ oE ~hc~ t~al:ment cl2~iir~?d. Th~ r~.a~linc~
~embers are also of suitable hard, wear-resista~-t material having polished surfaces in mo~t cases. I
1 In all of the preferred embocliments it will be ~Inder- I ~
stood that the retarding members in effect present a leading entry ~orifice which imposes the main restriction in a relatively resil-¦lient manner to the oncoming material, and in a way which prevents cutting or shearing by blades as the compressional forces~b~ild up, Iland this orifice shifts in position in a self-adjusting manner as 10 ¦¦the treatment establishes itself, all in the ways shown in ~he examples, to achieve extremely fine and controllable treatments.
While the swinging adjustment of the arms of the em-bodiment of Fig~ 1 has advantage in maintaining the relationship of the retarding member tips to the rolls throughout the range of 15 ¦movement, other arrangements are possible. For instance, in the ~embodiment of Fig. 14 the lower retarding assembly 29 is mounted ¦stationary (or on a linear slide 90, downstream movement being resiliently resisted by adjustably-positioned compression spring ~92) while the leading part of the retarding assembly is resiliently biased to follow the contour of the roll surface. The upper re- ;
tarding assembly 29 (optionally, similarly mounted on slide 90a and resisted by compression spring 92a) is mounted on elongated pivot arm 94, biased into the nip by compression spring 96. (For l purposes of illustration, the embodiment shows the upper roll held 25 ljupwardly in a nonoperative position, and exaggerates the thickness !1 !jf the members forming the retardin~ members.) The retarding ¦members themselves may comprise any o~ the embodiments previously . .
Idescribed.
jl Since the drive rolls are relatively smooth, the blades 30 ,will wear relatively slowly. In cases where wear does oc~cur, Iblades can be simply replaced, or adjustment of the blades re-,¦lative to their supports can be made to compensate for the wear.
.'1 ~
i .. ..... . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . . ... . . . . .. .
24~ ~
. ~ .
The blades may be insulated from their holders in order to assume , the temper~t~lre of the machine, or of course separate heaters m~y be emplQyed in cases where diffeIential temperatures occur to remedy any distortion problems. The blade assemblies can provide stea~, hot air or kreatment gas distribution chambers, I and the resilient blades can be perforated to admit such gases I to the fabric both in the compression cavity in advance of the retarding assembly and in the retention passage following the ~ retarding orifice.
10 ¦I To further explain operation according to the invention, ¦ during start-up, opposition by the dams or springs of the various ¦ retarding members causes the material to be retarded, see Figs. 4, 7, 9, 10, and ll. Oncoming material is then longitudinally com-I pacted in the confines of the diverging passage defined by the 15 ~ moving rolls, downstream of the nip center line ~- , and upstream I
of the retarding device. The retarding forces are thus transmitted upstream through a compacting column o~ web t~ a line x, at which the grip of the drive rolls on the material is first overcome.
Further oncoming untreated material reaching line x sLips relative to the drive rolls and is longitudinally compacted against the al-ready compacted column, while the column is continuously forced to exit through the restricted region formed by the leading parts o~
the retarding members. The line x can shi~t to the right, toward ¦ the line of centers, if the compacted material forces the rolls 25 1 apart from their original position. In any event, the retarding , members are maintained in position such that the line x of initial I compaction continually remains upstream from them, where the material is confined by the gradual diverging, moving roll I surfaces as it is longitudinally~compacted. The entire a~tion 30 1 upon the material thus occurs in essentially a straight line ~ - 18 -' ... . . ... . . . .. . . . .. . . .
8~24~3 .
.
across the widkh oE the web with both sides of the materi~l Il exposed to respectively similar conditions during driving and ¦I retarding stages, and with only ligh-t crushing forces on the lll wèb perpendicular to -the web pl~ne.
5 I~i In m~chines according to the invention, as previously mentioned, the distance over which the treatmen-t actually occurs is very short. In preferred embodiments employing drive roils both of 5 inch diameter, for instance, dlmension A, from the nip line of centers to the initial part of the retarding device may be from 1/10 to 1/2 inch for a range of felt, non woven, woven and knitted materials.
The surfaces of the retarding members downstream from their leading parts serve a retention function, being arranged to confine the material under a condition of partial release from face-wise constraint, but still under compression. Their retarding effect is minor while still time-dependent setting processes can occur. Depending upon the particular process involved,these passayes may be subjected to heating or cooling conditions, or to steaming or to treatment with other fluids, as suggested above. The continuation of the retarding members outwardly therebeyond also serve as supports for properly positioning the active leading parts.
For reliable operation in most treatments, the resilient compensatory actions that have been described help to assure uniform flow and treatment, and to ensure positioning of the point o~ compaction continually in the nip, preceding the retarding device. But, as previously suggested, for instance with cer-tain needled felts of e.g., 1/4 to 3/8 inch uncompressed thick-¦ness, the material itself, when longitudinally compac'ed~in the machine, still provides the needed resilience to resiliently _ .. _. .__ ._ . . .. .~ . . _ .. . . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . ... . . . .. .
compact or e~pand in the direction oE its thic~.ness as pressures r~sp~ctively tend to rise or ~all. In such cases an entirely rigid system may be employed.
The following are examples oE cavity con~igurations operable according to the invention.
Example I: A web has an uncompressed thickness of .032 inches and a nipped dimension of .012 inch at the center-line of the spring-biased S inch diameter rolls, under normal driving Iconditions. The two retarding members, constructed according to Figs. 11-13, comprise steel plates of .050 inch thickness, with ¦,ends hollow ground`to match the curvature of the rolls, but I~ieach with a leading end portion formed in accordance with Figs. 11-1'13, dimension G of .008 inch and angle a = 55. In the running ¦condition the ends of the retarding members are 0.16 and 0.25 inch lS "from the line of centers, ~ , respectively. The dimension Dl between the roll surfaces immediately preceding the retarding Idevice is larger than dimenison D2I the minimum dimension between ¦the retarding members.
¦ Example II: Similar to Example I, but with the con-struc~ion of Figs. 6-8, employing a convexly curved spring member 30 of .005 inch thickness blue steel, rounded with approximately 4 inch radius of curvature, and having its free tip approximately ~1/16 inch to the rear o~ the tip o~ the blade 32 upon which it is Imounted, as shown in Fig. 5. The curved spring member deflects to the position of Figs. 7 and 8 during operation.
¦ Example III: A configuration according to Figs. 2-4 in which the blade members 32 are each of at least .020 inch thickness , , mild steel, ~ith tips hollow ground to points as shown, ¦ matching the roll curva-ture. Spring members 30, of 1 .003 inch thickness, blue steelr each have a distinct down-1' ' ',.
.
.. , _ . _ _ . .. . . .. ..... ... . .... . . . ... . ... . . . .... .. .
.. . .
i wardly curved end, with sharp curv~kure beginning at a point about !
! 3/16 inch from their Eree tips. wlth this arrangemen-t at start-up the parts ma~ be forced into the nip in accordance with the I position of Fig. 2, virtually filling the nip with metal and 5 ! ensuring that flow of even the thinnest web will be opposed to commence and maintain the compactive action as described.
For treating such materials as tubular knitted webs, the parameters determining the resilient compensatory action are selected to maintain the roll surfaces and the retarding members in intimate supporting contact with the faces of the ~abric, supporting the fabric against creping throuyhout its transit through the machine. For treating double layer materials, the machine surfaces can be adjusted to engage the material identically on both sides to ensure equality o treatment.
15 I In cases such as these the relationship of the parts ensures .
¦ that the material, even at start-up, never escapes past the ~l leading portion of the retarding assembly without being compacted.
¦I The material is confined by the gently diverging hard surfaces I of t~e rolls while the retarding members perform their damming ¦ opposition function to create and maintain the co~pacted column.
¦ The column, because of its shortness and denseness, and the pre-¦I ferred angular relationship of the dams, has the ability to ¦bridge the transition between moving and sta~ionary surfaces ! at both faces of the web without detrimental snagging, and the ~ material proceeds throughout the machine while intimately engaged .
I and supported on both sides. By this means a micro-treatment, ¦ without production of gross folds or detrimental crepe, is I obtainable.
! For treating loosely formed bats of webs, such~as jl, filter media, the drive rolls can engage the web only with I .
~, - 21- ~
11' . I ., . _ . _ . . ... . . .. . .. ... .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . .
t sufficient force to -thrust the material Eorward without undue Icrushing of the web in the direction of its thickness. In such 1. 1 a case the machine surfaces may be relaxed to a position to pro-duce a desired crepe of the material to re-orient the fibers as ,desired, while still the initial compaction proceeds in advance of the retarding device, in the manner described.
One aspect of the invention concerns the realization ¦that, for very fine treatments, especially with materials Idifficult to treat~ the s~art-up position and ~unning positions ~cannot be the same. The invention provides a self-adjusting Imechanism that achieves the proper geometry through the various ¦Istages .
¦I Suitable variations of the parameters of the machines l'will be readily determined for a wide variety of webs and end luses in light of the foregoing disclosure.
Wl ~t i~ claimed i-:
, .1 ' ' - 22 -I, .
,,, ,, ,, , I. ,,,,, ,, , .,, " ",, , ....... .. , :
Claims (28)
1. A method of longitudinal compressive treatment of a traveling web, comprising driving the web forward along a web path by a pair of oppositely rotating, stable-surfaced rolls that form a drive nip, and retarding the web on the exit side of the drive nip, characterized in that retarding is accomplished by a damming effect produced by a dam means capable of presenting a frontal surface inclined to the direction of travel of the approach-ing web, said method further characterized by steadily maintaining said dam means in a position in the region of minor divergence of said roll surfaces, said position being at a distance downstream from the line of centers of said pair of rolls less than about 5 percent of the sum of the diameters of said rolls, said position establishing between the roll surfaces a longitudinal compression cavity of correspondingly short length and of consequent short height that confines a longitudinally com-pacted moving column of web, fresh web that is progressively deli-vered by said drive nip being compressed against the end of said moving column confined in said short cavity.
2. The method according to claim 1 characterized in maintaining said position of said dam means at such a short distance from said line of centers that said surfaces of said rolls bounding said cavity are effective to continually intimately contact the faces of the web and support the web against folding upon itself, whereby said web remains continually within its original general plane without gross pleating throughout its longitudinal compressive treatment.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2 characterized in that the flow of the web through said short cavity is opposed by a resiliently applied force.
4. A machine for practicing the method of claim 1 comprising a pair of oppositely rotating stable-surfaced rolls, and a retarding device on the exit side of the nip, formed by at least one relatively stationary retarding member held next to a given roll, characterized in that the initial part of said retarding member defines said dam means and downstream of said dam means said retarding member defines a surface for engagement with the web as it emerges from said short compression cavity, the leading part of said retarding member being sufficiently small to enable said dam means to enter the region of minor divergence of said roll surfaces downstream from the line of centers of said pair of rolls at a distance less than about 5 per-cent of the sum of the diameters of said rolls.
5. The machine of claim 4 characterized in that the initial forward part of said retarding member presents a web-engaging surface which, in unstressed condition, is convexly curved in the direction of travel of said web, shaped to enable continual uniform flow of the web thereover while imposing resistance to said flow.
6. The machine of claim 5 characterized in that the radius of curva-ture of said retarding member is less near its forward end than rearward thereof.
7. The machine of claim 4 characterized in that said retarding member is a spring of sheet form extending generally in the direction of the web path and having a forward end converging toward the respective nip roll.
8. The machine of any of the claims 4, 5 or 7 characterized in that the forward end of said retarding member is free to slide during resilient deflection of said retarding member.
9. The machine of any of claims 4, 5 or 7 characterized in that a second member is interposed between said retarding member and the respective roll, said second member having an initial upstream portion adjacent to said roll, in advance of the upstream end of said retarding member, against which the forward end of said retarding member bears.
10. The machine of any of the claims 4, 5 or 7 characterized in that the forward end of the said retarding member bears directly upon the adjacent roll.
11. The machine of claim 4 characterized in that said retarding member, at least in its forwardmost position, has a portion downstream of said dam means which conforms to the curvature of the roll opposite to said given roll, forming a passage for material therebetween.
12. The machine of claim 11 characterized in that said retarding member comprises a sheet form member having a rearward portion of a thickness sufficient to provide stiffness against bowing under the influence of said compressed material and having a forward portion of relatively reduced thick-ness resiliently conforming to the curvature of said opposite roll.
13. The machine of claim 4 useful with web material which has substan-tial self-resilience in the direction of its thickness characterized in that said dam means is formed as an integral nose portion of a retarding member of substantially rigid form.
14. The machine according to any of the claims 4, 7 or 13 characterized in that said retarding member is movable to vary the relative position of the initial part of said retarding member relative to said line of centers from a start-up to a further spaced steady-operating position.
15. The machine of any of the claims 4, 5 or 7 characterized in that said retarding device defines a resilient nipping surface at both sides of the web.
16. The machine of claim 4 further characterized in that said retarding device is formed by a pair of relatively stationary retarding members between which the web is pushed by the drive nip, the initial part of at least one of said retarding members defining said dam means.
17. The machine of claim 16 characterized in that each of said retard-ing members defines a said dam means.
18. The machine of claim 16 characterized in that said retarding members are movable from a first position in which one retarding member defining said claim means has its leading edge immediately adjacent to the line of centers of said pair of rolls and that of the other retarding member is spaced a greater distance from said line of centers, to a second position in which the said spacings of said retarding members are more nearly equal.
19. The machine of claim 18 characterized in that each of said retard-ing members is rotatably mounted about its respective roll and a linkage interconnects said retarding members causing rotation of a first retarding member away from said line of centers to cause dependent rotation of the second member toward said line of centers.
20. The machine of claim 4 characterized in that said retarding device is formed by a single relatively stationary retarding member held next to a given roll, and the initial forward part of said retarding member comprises means defining a resilient nipping surface cooperative with adjacent surfaces of said drive rolls to maintain in position in advance of said retarding device said longitudinally compacted moving column of web against which fresh web is progressively compressed.
21. The machine of claim 20 characterized in that said retarding member has a portion downstream of said initial part which generally con-forms to the curvature of the roll opposite to said given roll, forming a passage for treated material therebetween.
22. The machine of claim 21 characterized in that said conforming portion of said retarding member comprises a roughened surface for imposing drag upon the compressed web passing thereover.
23. The machine of claim 20, 21 or 22 characterized in that said opposite roll has reduced web drive capability relative to said given roll, e.g., it has a smoother surface than said given roll or is driven at speed slower than said given roll.
24. The machine of claim 4 characterized in that means resiliently biases a said retarding member defining said dam means into said drive nip, said retarding member thereby movable inwardly and outwardly in slight self-adjusting motion in response to respective variation in compressional forces exerted by said compacted column.
25. The machine of claim 24 characterized in that said retarding member includes a resilient spring member which is disposed for stopping-contact with an exposed working surface of the machine in the absence of web, said resilient spring member substantially filling said drive nip, to oppose the travel of web thereafter entering said compression cavity.
26. The machine of claim 4 characterized in that said dam means is defined by a member resilient in the direction normal to the surface of said web arranged to produce resilient compensatory motion to slightly vary the cross-section of the web flow path past said dam means in response to respective variation in compressional forces exerted by said compacted column.
27. The machine of any of the claims 4, 13 or 26 characterized in that said nip rolls are pressed together by a resilient means permitting said rolls to slightly separate to increase said cavity height in response to respective variation of the compressional force within said cavity.
28. The machine of any of the claims 4, 16 or 13 characterized in that said dam means comprises a resilient sheet-form spring member terminating at a free end directed upstream relative to the moving web, the terminal part of said spring member curving upstream from a direction generally parallel to the path of travel of the web to a direction forming an acute angle .alpha. therewith, in a manner converging upstream toward the surface of said given roll that lies on the respective side of the web.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| US736,859 | 1976-10-29 | ||
| US05/736,859 US4142278A (en) | 1976-10-29 | 1976-10-29 | Compressive treatment of web materials |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CA1084248A true CA1084248A (en) | 1980-08-26 |
Family
ID=24961605
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA289,033A Expired CA1084248A (en) | 1976-10-29 | 1977-10-19 | Compressive treatment of web materials |
Country Status (21)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US4142278A (en) |
| JP (1) | JPS5370188A (en) |
| AT (1) | AT375687B (en) |
| AU (1) | AU515247B2 (en) |
| BE (1) | BE860308A (en) |
| BR (1) | BR7707224A (en) |
| CA (1) | CA1084248A (en) |
| CH (1) | CH630216B (en) |
| DE (1) | DE2748449C2 (en) |
| DK (1) | DK148599C (en) |
| ES (1) | ES463681A1 (en) |
| FI (1) | FI63264C (en) |
| FR (1) | FR2369373A1 (en) |
| GB (1) | GB1591387A (en) |
| GR (1) | GR61362B (en) |
| IL (1) | IL53202A (en) |
| IT (1) | IT1116318B (en) |
| MX (1) | MX147612A (en) |
| NL (1) | NL185232C (en) |
| NO (1) | NO145697C (en) |
| SE (1) | SE416827B (en) |
Families Citing this family (30)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO1981000082A1 (en) * | 1979-06-28 | 1981-01-22 | Tilburg R | Creping machine and method |
| FI830918L (en) * | 1982-03-19 | 1983-09-20 | Richard Rhodes Walton | REFERENCE FOR A LONGITUDINAL SINGLE PRESS |
| US4627849A (en) * | 1982-06-30 | 1986-12-09 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Tampon |
| US4503593A (en) * | 1983-01-03 | 1985-03-12 | Celanese Corporation | Stuffer box crimper |
| JPS61501764A (en) * | 1984-03-29 | 1986-08-21 | ウォルトン，リチャ−ド・ア−ル | Apparatus and method for longitudinal compression treatment of strip material |
| US4859169A (en) * | 1986-11-20 | 1989-08-22 | Richard R. Walton | Web processing by longitudinal compression using matched drive disks and retarding fingers |
| US5060349A (en) * | 1987-04-02 | 1991-10-29 | Richard R. Walton | Compressive treatment of webs |
| US4921643A (en) * | 1988-06-24 | 1990-05-01 | Richard R. Walton | Web processing with two mated rolls |
| US5117540A (en) * | 1990-09-24 | 1992-06-02 | Richard R. Walton | Longitudinal compressive treatment of web materials |
| EP0686087B1 (en) * | 1993-02-04 | 1998-11-04 | WALTON, Richard C.,(Executor for the Estate of Richard R. Walton,deceased) | Apparatus for compressively treating flexible sheet materials |
| US5678288A (en) * | 1993-02-22 | 1997-10-21 | Richard R. Walton | Compressively treating flexible sheet materials |
| US5666703A (en) * | 1994-02-04 | 1997-09-16 | Richard C. Walton | Apparatus for compressively treating flexible sheet materials |
| US5582892A (en) * | 1994-04-08 | 1996-12-10 | Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company | Dimensionally stable particle-loaded PTFE web |
| US5553365A (en) * | 1994-12-06 | 1996-09-10 | Catallo; Frank | Means for controlling deflection in a two-roll fabric shrinker |
| PT851947E (en) * | 1995-09-20 | 2003-07-31 | Tubular Textile Llc | ADJUSTMENT AND CLEANING MECHANISM FOR COMPRESSIVE ENGINEERING APPLIANCES |
| US6114595A (en) * | 1996-04-11 | 2000-09-05 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Stretchable, extensible composite topsheet for absorbent articles |
| CA2248727C (en) * | 1997-12-19 | 2007-08-14 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Mechanical softening of sheet material |
| USD419780S (en) * | 1998-11-04 | 2000-02-01 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Embossed tissue |
| USD419779S (en) * | 1998-11-04 | 2000-02-01 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Embossed tissue |
| USD417962S (en) * | 1998-11-04 | 1999-12-28 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Embossed tissue |
| USD415353S (en) | 1998-11-04 | 1999-10-19 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Embossed tissue |
| US6681461B1 (en) * | 2000-10-20 | 2004-01-27 | Frank Catallo | Dual-slip compressive shrink-proofing apparatus for fabric and related method |
| JP4187532B2 (en) * | 2001-03-26 | 2008-11-26 | マイクレックス コーポレーション | Wiping using non-woven fabric |
| US7395587B2 (en) * | 2004-09-16 | 2008-07-08 | Frank Catallo | Apparatus for controlling a compression zone in a compressively shrinking fabric web |
| WO2007079502A2 (en) * | 2006-01-06 | 2007-07-12 | Micrex Corporation | Microcreping traveling sheet material |
| US8127410B2 (en) * | 2009-01-14 | 2012-03-06 | Frank Catallo | Spring steel slip sheet for a compactor and for extending into a compression zone defined by a feed roll and a retard roll for shrinking a fabric |
| US8590122B2 (en) * | 2011-03-17 | 2013-11-26 | Tubular Textile Machinery, Inc. | Method and apparatus for compacting tubular fabrics |
| US9725837B2 (en) * | 2014-11-26 | 2017-08-08 | Teresa Catallo | Shoe for a compactor and for avoiding heat deformation thereof |
| US9945067B1 (en) * | 2016-10-17 | 2018-04-17 | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | Airfoil apparatus for a system having a controlled internal environment |
| IT201700068662A1 (en) * | 2017-06-20 | 2018-12-20 | Lafer Spa | COMPACTING MACHINE, POSITIONING DEVICE AND POSITIONING METHOD |
Family Cites Families (23)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DE130463C (en) * | ||||
| DE127110C (en) * | ||||
| US1411656A (en) * | 1920-05-14 | 1922-04-04 | Colley Walter William | Machine for craping paper |
| US1582839A (en) * | 1920-11-05 | 1926-04-27 | Otaka Fabric Company | Paper-crinkling machine |
| US1548789A (en) * | 1921-05-18 | 1925-08-04 | Otaka Fabric Company | Paper-crinkling machine |
| US1686388A (en) * | 1927-03-18 | 1928-10-02 | Otaka Fabric Company | Paper-crinkling machine |
| US1690411A (en) * | 1927-05-21 | 1928-11-06 | Hudson David William | Creping of paper |
| US1751471A (en) * | 1929-05-04 | 1930-03-25 | Hudson Sharp Machine Co | Creping mechanism |
| US1762157A (en) * | 1929-05-09 | 1930-06-10 | Hudson Sharp Machine Co | Paper-creping machine |
| US1978407A (en) * | 1933-10-06 | 1934-10-30 | Cadgene Ernest | Fabric |
| US2115313A (en) * | 1934-06-12 | 1938-04-26 | Linen Industry Res Ass Of The | Apparatus for crimping textile fibrous material |
| US2039882A (en) * | 1935-12-27 | 1936-05-05 | Hunter James Machine Co | Fulling mill |
| GB529579A (en) * | 1939-03-20 | 1940-11-25 | Wrigley John Herbert | Improvements relating to the shrinking of textile fabrics |
| US2409997A (en) * | 1944-11-24 | 1946-10-22 | James W Straubel | Creping machine |
| GB722966A (en) * | 1951-11-30 | |||
| US2851206A (en) * | 1954-08-03 | 1958-09-09 | Bancroft & Sons Co J | Random pleating of fabric |
| US2972795A (en) * | 1957-08-13 | 1961-02-28 | Crompton & Knowles Corp | Process for treating textile materials |
| US2958608A (en) * | 1958-04-18 | 1960-11-01 | Chicopee Mfg Corp | Textile fabrics and methods of making the same |
| US3260778A (en) * | 1964-01-23 | 1966-07-12 | Richard R Walton | Treatment of materials |
| US3390218A (en) * | 1964-10-06 | 1968-06-25 | Johnson & Johnson | Method of pleating sheet materials |
| CH439199A (en) * | 1964-07-18 | 1967-07-15 | Beckers Gustav | Device for the continuous upsetting of flat webs of material |
| DE1955196A1 (en) * | 1969-11-03 | 1971-05-06 | Vepa Ag | Textile woven or knitted fabric compaction - apparatus |
| US3869768A (en) * | 1971-02-16 | 1975-03-11 | Said Walton By Said Munchbach | Methods of compressively treating flexible sheet materials |
-
1976
- 1976-10-29 US US05/736,859 patent/US4142278A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1977
- 1977-10-18 GB GB43341/77A patent/GB1591387A/en not_active Expired
- 1977-10-19 CA CA289,033A patent/CA1084248A/en not_active Expired
- 1977-10-19 AU AU29845/77A patent/AU515247B2/en not_active Expired
- 1977-10-20 NO NO773606A patent/NO145697C/en unknown
- 1977-10-24 IL IL53202A patent/IL53202A/en unknown
- 1977-10-25 GR GR54640A patent/GR61362B/en unknown
- 1977-10-27 DE DE2748449A patent/DE2748449C2/en not_active Expired
- 1977-10-27 SE SE7712135A patent/SE416827B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-10-27 BR BR7707224A patent/BR7707224A/en unknown
- 1977-10-27 NL NLAANVRAGE7711838,A patent/NL185232C/en active Search and Examination
- 1977-10-28 IT IT69427/77A patent/IT1116318B/en active
- 1977-10-28 FR FR7732676A patent/FR2369373A1/en active Granted
- 1977-10-28 AT AT0771977A patent/AT375687B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-10-28 JP JP12954777A patent/JPS5370188A/en active Granted
- 1977-10-28 CH CH1315577A patent/CH630216B/en unknown
- 1977-10-28 MX MX171133A patent/MX147612A/en unknown
- 1977-10-28 FI FI773226A patent/FI63264C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-10-28 ES ES463681A patent/ES463681A1/en not_active Expired
- 1977-10-28 BE BE182219A patent/BE860308A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1977-10-28 DK DK480977A patent/DK148599C/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| AU515247B2 (en) | 1981-03-26 |
| AT375687B (en) | 1984-08-27 |
| SE7712135L (en) | 1978-04-30 |
| DE2748449C2 (en) | 1986-09-25 |
| MX147612A (en) | 1983-01-03 |
| SE416827B (en) | 1981-02-09 |
| FR2369373A1 (en) | 1978-05-26 |
| AU2984577A (en) | 1979-06-21 |
| DK148599C (en) | 1986-01-20 |
| CH630216GA3 (en) | 1982-06-15 |
| DE2748449A1 (en) | 1978-05-03 |
| FI773226A (en) | 1978-04-30 |
| FI63264C (en) | 1983-05-10 |
| GR61362B (en) | 1978-10-26 |
| NO145697C (en) | 1982-05-12 |
| BR7707224A (en) | 1978-07-25 |
| JPS5370188A (en) | 1978-06-22 |
| BE860308A (en) | 1978-02-15 |
| FI63264B (en) | 1983-01-31 |
| NO773606L (en) | 1978-05-03 |
| IT1116318B (en) | 1986-02-10 |
| CH630216B (en) | |
| DK480977A (en) | 1978-04-30 |
| ATA771977A (en) | 1984-01-15 |
| GB1591387A (en) | 1981-06-24 |
| NO145697B (en) | 1982-02-01 |
| IL53202A0 (en) | 1977-12-30 |
| IL53202A (en) | 1980-12-31 |
| ES463681A1 (en) | 1978-12-16 |
| DK148599B (en) | 1985-08-12 |
| NL185232C (en) | 1990-02-16 |
| FR2369373B1 (en) | 1982-07-02 |
| NL7711838A (en) | 1978-05-03 |
| US4142278A (en) | 1979-03-06 |
| JPS6224541B2 (en) | 1987-05-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CA1084248A (en) | Compressive treatment of web materials | |
| US5060349A (en) | Compressive treatment of webs | |
| US5117540A (en) | Longitudinal compressive treatment of web materials | |
| US3260778A (en) | Treatment of materials | |
| US3015145A (en) | Method and apparatus for treating web materials, such as fabrics | |
| US3426405A (en) | Confining device for compressive treatment of materials | |
| US4894196A (en) | Method and apparatus for longitudinal compressive treatment of webs | |
| US3975806A (en) | Apparatus for compressively treating flexible sheet materials | |
| US4859169A (en) | Web processing by longitudinal compression using matched drive disks and retarding fingers | |
| CA2182503C (en) | Means for controlling roll deflection in a two-roll fabric shrinker | |
| WO1991014817A1 (en) | Compressive shrinking apparatus utilizing an improved impact blade | |
| AU585716B2 (en) | Compressive treatment of fabric | |
| CA1167627A (en) | Longitudinal compressive treatment method and apparatus for web materials | |
| EP0176566A1 (en) | Longitudinal compressive treatment of webs | |
| US4432926A (en) | Method and apparatus for imparting two-way properties to flexible webs | |
| US4086687A (en) | Apparatus for relaxing or loosening needled textile fabrics | |
| GB2116593A (en) | Microcreping with surface diversion retarding |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKEX | Expiry |