Film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting is a term that encompasses individual motion pictures, the field of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting film as Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting an art form, and the motion picture industry. Films are produced Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting by recording images Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting from the world with Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting cameras, or Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting by creating images using animation techniques or special effects.
Films are cultural artifacts created by specific cultures, which reflect those cultures, and, in turn, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting affect them. Film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting is considered to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting be an important art form, a source of popular entertainment and a powerful method for educating � or Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting indoctrinating � citizens. The visual Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting elements of cinema gives motion pictures a universal power of communication. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Some films have become popular worldwide Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting attractions by using dubbing or subtitles that translate the dialogue.
Traditional films are made up Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting of a series of individual images called frames. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting When these images Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting are Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting shown rapidly in succession, a viewer has the illusion Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting that motion is occurring. The viewer cannot see the flickering between frames due to an effect known as persistence of vision, whereby the eye retains a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting
The Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting origin of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the name "film" comes from the fact that Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting photographic film (also Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting called film stock) had historically been the primary medium for Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting recording and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting displaying motion pictures. Many other terms exist for an individual motion picture, including picture, picture show, photo-play, flick, and most commonly, movie. Additional terms for the field in general Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting include the big screen, the silver screen, the cinema, and the movies.In the 1860s, mechanisms for Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting producing Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting artificially Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting created, two-dimensional images in motion were demonstrated with devices such as Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the zoetrope and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the praxinoscope. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting These machines were outgrowths of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting simple optical devices (such as magic lanterns) and would display sequences of still pictures at sufficient speed for the images on the pictures to appear Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting be moving, a phenomenon called persistence of vision. Naturally, the images needed to be carefully designed to achieve the desired effect � Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the underlying principle became the basis Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting for the development of film animation.
A frame from Roundhay Garden Scene, the world's earliest film, by Louis Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Le Prince, 1888
With the development of celluloid film for still photography, it became possible to directly capture objects in motion in real time. Early versions of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the technology sometimes required a person to look into a viewing machine Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to see the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting pictures which were separate paper prints attached to a drum Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting turned by a handcrank. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting The pictures were shown at a variable speed of about 5 to 10 pictures per second depending on how rapidly the crank was turned. Some of these machines Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting were coin operated. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting By the 1880s, the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting development Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting of the motion picture camera allowed the individual component images to be captured and stored on a single reel, and led quickly to the development of a motion picture projector to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting shine light through the processed and printed film and magnify these "moving picture shows" onto a screen for an entire audience. These reels, so exhibited, came to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting be known as "motion pictures". Early motion pictures Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting were static shots that showed an event or action with no editing or other cinematic techniques.
Ignoring Dickson's early sound experiments (1894), Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting commercial motion pictures were purely visual art through the late 19th century, but these innovative silent films had Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting gained a hold on the public imagination. Around the turn of the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting twentieth century, films began developing a narrative structure by Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting stringing scenes together to tell narratives. The Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting scenes were later broken Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting up into multiple shots of varying sizes and angles. Other Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting techniques such as camera movement were realized Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as effective ways Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to portray a story on film. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Rather than leave the audience in silence, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting theater owners would hire a pianist or organist or Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a full orchestra to play music fitting the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting mood of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the film at any given moment. By the early 1920s, most films came with a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting prepared list of sheet music for this purpose, with complete film scores being composed for major productions.
A shot from Georges Melies Le Voyage dans la Lune (A Trip to the Moon) (1902), an early narrative film.
The Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting rise of European Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting cinema was interrupted by the breakout of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting World Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting War I while the film industry in United Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting States flourished with the rise of Hollywood. However in the 1920s, European Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting filmmakers such as Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Sergei Eisenstein, F. W. Murnau, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and Fritz Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Lang, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting along with American innovator Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting D. W. Griffith and the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting contributions of Charles Chaplin, Buster Keaton and others, continued to advance the medium. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting In the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting 1920s, new technology Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting allowed filmmakers to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting attach to each film a soundtrack of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting speech, music and sound effects synchronized with the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting action on the screen. These sound films were initially distinguished by calling them "talking Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting pictures", or talkies.
The next major step in the development of cinema was the introduction of so-called "natural" color. While the addition of sound quickly eclipsed silent film and theater musicians, color was adopted more gradually as Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting methods evolved making it more practical and cost effective to produce "natural color" films. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting The public was relatively indifferent to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting color Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting photography as opposed Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to black-and-white,[citation needed] but as color processes improved and became Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as affordable as Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting black-and-white film, more and more movies were filmed in color after the end of World War II, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as the industry in America came to view color as essential to attracting audiences in its competition with television, which remained a black-and-white medium until the mid-1960s. By the end of the 1960s, col
Since the decline of the studio system in the 1960s, the succeeding decades saw changes in the production and style of film. New Hollywood, French New Wave and the rise of film school educated independent filmmakers were all part of the changes the medium experienced in the latter half of the 20th century. Digital technology has Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting been the driving force in change throughout the 1990s and into the 21st century.
Theory
Main article: Film theory
Film theory seeks to develop Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting concise and systematic concepts that apply to the study of film as art. It was started by Ricciotto Canudo's The Birth of the Sixth Art. Formalist film theory, led by Rudolf Arnheim, Bela Balazs, and Siegfried Kracauer, emphasized how film differed from reality, and thus could be considered a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting valid fine art. Andre Bazin reacted against Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting this theory by arguing that film's artistic essence lay in its ability Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting mechanically reproduce Myspace Wife Boob Cheating Movie reality not in its differences from reality, and this gave Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting rise Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to realist theory. More recent analysis spurred by Lacan's psychoanalysis and Ferdinand de Saussure's semiotics among other things has given rise to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting psychoanalytical film theory, structuralist film theory, feminist film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting theory and others.
Criticism
Main article: Film criticism
Film criticism is Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the analysis and evaluation of films. In general, these works can be divided into two categories: academic criticism by film scholars and journalistic film criticism that appears regularly in newspapers Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and other media.
Film critics working Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting for newspapers, magazines, and broadcast media mainly review new Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting releases. Normally they only Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting see any given film once and have only Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a day or two to formulate opinions. Despite this, critics have an important impact on films, especially those of certain genres. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Mass marketed action, horror, and comedy films tend not to be greatly Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting affected by a critic's overall judgment of a film. The plot summary and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting description of a film that makes up the majority of any film review can still have Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting an important impact on whether people decide to see a film. For prestige films such as most dramas, the influence of reviews is extremely important. Poor reviews will often doom a film to obscurity Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and financial loss.
The impact of a reviewer on a given film's box office performance is a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting matter of debate. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Some claim that movie marketing is now so intense and well financed that reviewers cannot make an Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting impact against it. However, the cataclysmic failure of some heavily-promoted movies which Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting were harshly reviewed, as well as the unexpected success of critically praised independent movies indicates that extreme critical reactions can have considerable Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting influence. Others note that positive film reviews have been shown to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting spark interest in little-known films. Conversely, there have been several films in which film companies have so little confidence that they refuse Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to give reviewers an advanced viewing to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting avoid widespread panning Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting of the film. However, this usually backfires as reviewers are wise to the tactic and warn the public that the film may not be worth seeing and the films Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting often do poorly as a result.
It is argued that journalist film critics should only be known Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as film reviewers, and true film critics are those who take a more academic approach to films. This line of work is more Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting often known as film theory or film studies. These film critics attempt to come to understand how film and filming techniques work, and what effect they have on people. Rather than having their works published in newspapers or appear on television, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting their articles are published in scholarly journals, or sometimes in up-market magazines. They also tend to be affiliated with colleges or universities.
Industry
Main article: Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Film industry
The making and showing of motion pictures became Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a source of profit Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting almost as soon as Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting process was invented. Upon seeing how successful their Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting new invention, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and its Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting product, was in their native France, the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Lumieres quickly set Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting about touring the Continent to exhibit the first films privately to royalty and publicly to the masses. In each country, they would normally add new, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting local scenes to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting their catalogue and, quickly enough, found local entrepreneurs in the various countries of Europe to buy their equipment and photograph, export, import and screen additional product commercially. The Oberammergau Passion Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Play of 1898[citation needed] was the first commercial motion picture ever produced. Other pictures soon followed, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and motion pictures Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting became a separate industry that overshadowed the vaudeville world. Dedicated theaters and companies formed specifically Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to produce and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting distribute films, while motion picture actors became Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting major celebrities and commanded huge fees for Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting their performances. Already by 1917, Charlie Chaplin had a contract that called for Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting an annual salary of one Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting million dollars.
In the United States today, much of the film industry is centered around Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Hollywood. Other regional centers exist in many parts of the world, such as Mumbai-centered Bollywood, the Indian film industry's Hindi cinema Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting which produces the largest number of films in the world.[1] Whether the ten thousand-plus feature length Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting films a year produced by the Valley pornographic film industry should qualify for this Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting title is the source of some debate.[citation needed] Though the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting expense involved The Movie The Exorcist in making movies has led cinema Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting production to concentrate under the auspices of movie studios, recent advances in affordable film making equipment Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting have allowed independent film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting productions Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to flourish.
Profit Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting is a key force Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting in the industry, due to the costly and risky nature of filmmaking; Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting many films have Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting large cost Homemade Cumshot Movie overruns, a notorious example being Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Kevin Costner's Waterworld. Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Yet many filmmakers strive to create works of lasting social significance. The Academy Awards (also known as "the Oscars") are the most prominent film awards in the United States, providing recognition each year to films, ostensibly based Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting on their artistic merits.
There is also a large Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting industry for educational and instructional films made in lieu of or in addition to lectures and texts.
Preview
A preview performance refers to a showing of a movie to a select audience, usually for the purposes of corporate promotions, before the public film premiere itself. Previews Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting are sometimes Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting used to judge Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting audience reaction, which if unexpectedly negative, may result in recutting or even refilming Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting certain sections. (cf Audience response.)
Trailer
Main article: Trailer (film)
Trailers or previews are film advertisements for films that will Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting be exhibited in the future at a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting cinema, on whose screen they are shown. The term "trailer" comes from their having originally been shown at the end of a film programme. That practice did not last long, because Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting patrons tended to leave the theater after the films ended, but the name has stuck. Trailers are now shown before the film (or the A Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting movie in a double feature program) Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting begins.
The nature of the film determines the size and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting type of crew required during filmmaking. Many Hollywood adventure films need computer generated imagery (CGI), created by dozens of 3D modellers, animators, rotoscopers Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and compositors. However, a low-budget, independent film may be made with a skeleton crew, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting often Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting paid very little. Also, an open Veggie Tale Movie source film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting may be produced through Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting open, collaborative processes. Filmmaking takes place all over the world using different technologies, styles of acting and genre, and is produced in a variety of economic contexts that range from state-sponsored documentary in China to profit-oriented movie making Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting within the American studio system.
This production cycle typically takes three years. The first year is taken up with development. The second year comprises preproduction and production. The third year, post-production and distribution.
Crew
Main article: Film crew
A film crew Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting is a group of people hired by a film company, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting employed during the "production" or "photography" phase, for the purpose of producing a film or motion picture. Crew are distinguished from cast, the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting actors who Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting appear in front of the camera or provide voices for characters in the film. The crew interacts with but is also distinct from the production staff, consisting of producers, managers, company representatives, Catheter Movie Gallery their assistants, and those whose primary responsibility falls in pre-production or post-production phases, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting such as writers and editors. Communication between production and crew generally passes through the director and his/her staff of assistants. Medium-to-large crews are generally divided into departments with well defined hierarchies and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting standards for interaction and cooperation between the departments. Other than acting, the crew handles everything in the photography phase: props and costumes, shooting, sound, electrics (i.e., Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting lights), sets, and production special effects. Caterers (known in the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting film industry as "craft services") Dvd Box Set Halloween Movie Region are usually Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting not considered part of the crew.
|
Technology
Film stock consists of transparent celluloid, acetate, or polyester base coated with an emulsion containing light-sensitive chemicals. Cellulose nitrate was the first type of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting film base used to record motion pictures, but due to its Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting flammability Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting was eventually replaced by safer Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting materials. Stock Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting widths and the film format Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting for images on the reel have had a rich history, though most large commercial films are still Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting shot on (and distributed to theaters) as 35 mm prints.
Originally moving picture film was shot Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting projected at various speeds using hand-cranked Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting cameras and projectors; though 1000 frames per minute (16? frame/s) is generally cited as a standard silent speed, research indicates most films were shot between 16 frame/s and 23 frame/s Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and projected from 18 frame/s on up (often reels included instructions on how fast Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting each scene should be shown) [1]. When sound film was introduced Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting in the late 1920s, a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting constant speed was required for the sound head. 24 frames per Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting second was chosen because it was the slowest (and thus cheapest) speed which allowed for sufficient sound quality. Improvements since the late 19th century Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting include the mechanization of cameras � allowing them to record Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting at a consistent speed, quiet camera design � allowing sound recorded on-set to be usable without Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting requiring large "blimps" to encase the camera, the invention Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting of more sophisticated filmstocks Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting lenses, allowing directors to film in increasingly dim conditions, and the development of synchronized sound, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting allowing sound to be recorded at exactly the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting same speed as its corresponding action. The soundtrack can be recorded separately from shooting the film, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting but for live-action pictures Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting many parts of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the soundtrack are usually recorded simultaneously.
As a medium, film is not limited Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to motion pictures, since Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the technology developed as the basis for photography. It can be used to present Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a progressive sequence of still images in the form of a slideshow. Film has also been incorporated into multimedia presentations, and often has importance as primary historical documentation. However, historic films have problems in terms of preservation and storage, and the motion picture industry Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting is exploring many alternatives. Most Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting movies on cellulose nitrate Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting base have been copied onto modern safety films. Some studios save Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting color films through the use of separation masters � three B&W negatives each Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting exposed through red, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting green, or blue filters Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting (essentially a reverse of the Technicolor process). Digital methods have also been used to restore films, although their continued obsolescence cycle makes them (as of 2006) a poor choice Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting for Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting long-term preservation. Film preservation of decaying film stock is a matter of concern to both Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting film historians and archivists, and to companies interested in preserving their existing products in order to make them Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting available Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to future generations (and thereby increase revenue). Preservation is generally a higher-concern for Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting nitrate and single-strip color films, due to their Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting high decay rates; black and white films on safety bases and color films preserved on Technicolor imbibition prints tend to keep up much better, assuming proper Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting handling and storage.
Some films in recent decades have been recorded using Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting analog video technology similar to that used in television production. Modern digital video cameras and digital projectors are gaining ground as well. These Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting approaches are extremely beneficial to moviemakers, especially because footage can be evaluated and edited without waiting Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting for the film stock to be processed. Yet the migration is gradual, and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as of 2005 Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting most major motion pictures are still recorded on film.
Independent
Main article: Independent Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting film
The Lumiere Brothers
Independent filmmaking often takes place outside of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Hollywood, or other major studio systems. An independent film (or indie film) is a film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting initially produced without financing or distribution from a major Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting movie studio. Creative, business, and technological reasons have all Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting contributed to the growth of the indie film scene in the late 20th and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting early 21st century.
On the business Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting side, the costs Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting big-budget studio films also leads to conservative choices in cast and crew. There is a trend in Hollywood towards co-financing (over two-thirds of the films put out by Warner Bros. in 2000 were joint ventures, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting up from 10% in 1987).[2] A Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting hopeful director is almost never Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting given the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting opportunity to get a job on a big-budget studio film unless he or she has Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting significant industry Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting experience Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting in film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting or television. Also, the studios rarely produce Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting films with unknown actors, particularly in Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting lead roles.
Before Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the advent of digital alternatives, the cost of professional film equipment and stock was also a hurdle to being able to produce, direct, or star Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting in a traditional studio film. The cost of 35 mm film is outpacing inflation: in 2002 alone, film negative costs were up 23%, according to Variety.[2].
But Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the advent of consumer camcorders in 1985, and Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting more importantly, the arrival of high-resolution Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting digital video in the early Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting 1990s, have lowered the technology barrier to movie production significantly. Both production and post-production costs have been significantly lowered; today, the hardware and software for post-production can be Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting installed in a commodity-based personal computer. Technologies such as DVDs, FireWire connections and non-linear editing system Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting pro-level software like Adobe Premiere Pro, Sony Vegas and Apple's Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Final Cut Pro, and consumer level software such as Apple's Final Cut Express and iMovie make movie-making relatively inexpensive.
Since the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting introduction of DV Tv Movie John Wyatt technology, the means of production have become more democratized. Filmmakers can Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting conceivably shoot and edit a movie, create and edit the sound and music, and mix the final cut on a home computer. However, while the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting means of production may be Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting democratized, financing, distribution, and marketing remain difficult Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to accomplish outside the traditional system. Most independent Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting filmmakers rely on film festivals to get their films noticed Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and sold for distribution. The arrival of internet-based video outlets such Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as YouTube and Veoh has further changed the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting film making landscape in ways that are still to be determined.
Open content film
Main article: Open Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting content film
An open content film is much Black Up My Wife Movie like an independent film, but it is produced through open collaborations; its source material is available under a license which is permissive enough to allow other parties to create fan fiction or derivative works, than a traditional copyright. Like independent filmmaking, open source filmmaking takes place outside of Hollywood, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting or other major studio Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting systems.
Fan film
Main article: Fan film
A fan film is a film or video inspired by a film, television program, comic book or a similar source, created by fans rather than by Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the source's copyright holders or creators. Fan filmmakers have traditionally been Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting amateurs, but some of the more notable films have actually been produced by professional filmmakers as film school class projects or as demonstration reels. Fan films vary tremendously in length, from short faux-teaser trailers for non-existent motion pictures to rarer full-length motion pictures
Animation Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting is the technique in which each frame of a film is produced The Golden Compass Movie Times individually, whether generated Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a computer graphic, or by photographing a drawn image, or by repeatedly making small changes to a model unit (see claymation and stop motion), and then Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting photographing the result with a special animation camera. When the frames are strung Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting together and the resulting film is viewed at a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting speed of 16 or more frames per second, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting there is an illusion of continuous Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting movement (due to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the persistence of vision). Generating such Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a film is very labour intensive and tedious, though the development of computer animation has greatly sped up Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the process.
File formats like GIF, QuickTime, Shockwave and Flash allow animation to be viewed on a computer or over the Internet.
Because animation Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting is very time-consuming and often very expensive to produce, the majority of animation for TV and movies comes from professional animation studios. However, the field of independent animation has existed at least since the 1950s, with animation Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting being produced by independent studios (and sometimes by a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting single person). Several independent animation producers have gone on to enter the professional animation industry.
Limited animation is Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a way of increasing production and decreasing costs of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting animation by Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting using "short Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting cuts" in the animation process. This method was pioneered by UPA and popularized Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting by Hanna-Barbera, and adapted by other Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting studios as cartoons moved from movie theaters to television.[3]
Although most animation studios are now using digital technologies in their productions, there is a specific style of animation that depends on film. Cameraless animation, made famous by moviemakers like Norman McLaren, Len Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Lye and Stan Brakhage, is painted and drawn directly onto pieces of film, and then run through Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting projector.
Venues
When Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting it is initially produced, a feature film is often shown to audiences in a movie theater or cinema. The first theater designed exclusively Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting for cinema opened in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in 1905.[4] Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting Thousands of such theaters were built or converted from existing Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting facilities within a few years.[5] In the United States, these theaters came to be known Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting as nickelodeons, because Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting admission typically Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting cost Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting a nickel (five cents).
Typically, one film is the featured presentation (or feature film). Before the 1970s, there were "double features"; typically, a high quality "A picture" rented by an independent theater for a lump sum, and a "B picture" of lower quality rented for a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting percentage of the gross receipts. Today, the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting bulk of the material shown before Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the feature film consists of Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting previews for upcoming movies and paid advertisements (also known as trailers or "The Twenty").
Historically, all mass marketed feature films were made to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting be shown in movie theaters. The development of television has allowed films Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to be broadcast to Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting larger audiences, usually after Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the film is no longer being shown in Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting theaters. Recording technology has also enabled Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting consumers to rent or buy copies of films on VHS or DVD (and the older formats of laserdisc, VCD and SelectaVision � see also videodisc), and Internet downloads may be available Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting and have started to become revenue sources for the Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting film companies. Some films Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting are now made specifically for Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting these other venues, being released as made-for-TV movies or direct-to-video movies. The production values on these films are often considered to be of inferior quality compared to theatrical releases in similar genres, and indeed, some films that are rejected by their own studios upon completion Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting are distributed through these markets.
The movie theater pays an average of about 50-55% of its ticket sales to the movie studio, as film Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting rental fees.[6] The actual percentage starts with a number higher than that, and decreases as the duration of a film's showing continues, as an incentive Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting to theaters to keep movies in the theater longer. However, today's barrage of highly marketed movies ensures that most movies are shown in first-run theaters for less than 8 weeks. There are a few movies every year that defy this rule, often limited-release movies that start in only a few theaters and actually grow their Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting theater count through good word-of-mouth and reviews. According to a 2000 study by ABN AMRO, about 26% of Hollywood movie studios' Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting worldwide income came from box office ticket Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting sales; 46% came Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting from VHS and DVD sales to consumers; and 28% came from television (broadcast, cable, and pay-per-view).[6]
Future state
While motion picture films have been around for more than a Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting century, film is still a relative newcomer in Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting the pantheon of fine arts. In the 1950s, when television became widely available, industry analysts predicted the demise of local Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting movie theaters. Despite competition from television's increasing technological sophistication over the 1960s and 1970s, such as the development of color television and large screens, motion picture cinemas continued. In the 1980s, Movie Acting Vs Stage Acting when the |
